What is an orthonormal basis of a plane? [on hold]

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
2
down vote

favorite
1












I have a plane $ax+by+cz+d=0$, what is an orthonormal basis for it?



Is it a set of three 3D vectors $e_1, e_2, e_3$ with the following properties?



  1. each $e_i$ has unit length;


  2. $e_1perp e_2$, $e_2perp e_3$, $e_3perp e_1$;


  3. $e_1$ and $e_2$ lie on the plane and so $e_3$ is parallel to $(a,b,c)$.









share|cite|improve this question













put on hold as off-topic by Xander Henderson, Alex Francisco, Holo, ArsenBerk, GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會 yesterday


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – Xander Henderson, Alex Francisco, Holo, ArsenBerk, GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.












  • Your plane is not a subspace unless $d=0$.
    – DisintegratingByParts
    yesterday










  • @DisintegratingByParts I do not understand your comment.
    – Alessandro Jacopson
    yesterday














up vote
2
down vote

favorite
1












I have a plane $ax+by+cz+d=0$, what is an orthonormal basis for it?



Is it a set of three 3D vectors $e_1, e_2, e_3$ with the following properties?



  1. each $e_i$ has unit length;


  2. $e_1perp e_2$, $e_2perp e_3$, $e_3perp e_1$;


  3. $e_1$ and $e_2$ lie on the plane and so $e_3$ is parallel to $(a,b,c)$.









share|cite|improve this question













put on hold as off-topic by Xander Henderson, Alex Francisco, Holo, ArsenBerk, GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會 yesterday


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – Xander Henderson, Alex Francisco, Holo, ArsenBerk, GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.












  • Your plane is not a subspace unless $d=0$.
    – DisintegratingByParts
    yesterday










  • @DisintegratingByParts I do not understand your comment.
    – Alessandro Jacopson
    yesterday












up vote
2
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
2
down vote

favorite
1






1





I have a plane $ax+by+cz+d=0$, what is an orthonormal basis for it?



Is it a set of three 3D vectors $e_1, e_2, e_3$ with the following properties?



  1. each $e_i$ has unit length;


  2. $e_1perp e_2$, $e_2perp e_3$, $e_3perp e_1$;


  3. $e_1$ and $e_2$ lie on the plane and so $e_3$ is parallel to $(a,b,c)$.









share|cite|improve this question













I have a plane $ax+by+cz+d=0$, what is an orthonormal basis for it?



Is it a set of three 3D vectors $e_1, e_2, e_3$ with the following properties?



  1. each $e_i$ has unit length;


  2. $e_1perp e_2$, $e_2perp e_3$, $e_3perp e_1$;


  3. $e_1$ and $e_2$ lie on the plane and so $e_3$ is parallel to $(a,b,c)$.






linear-algebra geometry






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked 2 days ago









Alessandro Jacopson

4041522




4041522




put on hold as off-topic by Xander Henderson, Alex Francisco, Holo, ArsenBerk, GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會 yesterday


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – Xander Henderson, Alex Francisco, Holo, ArsenBerk, GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.




put on hold as off-topic by Xander Henderson, Alex Francisco, Holo, ArsenBerk, GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會 yesterday


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – Xander Henderson, Alex Francisco, Holo, ArsenBerk, GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.











  • Your plane is not a subspace unless $d=0$.
    – DisintegratingByParts
    yesterday










  • @DisintegratingByParts I do not understand your comment.
    – Alessandro Jacopson
    yesterday
















  • Your plane is not a subspace unless $d=0$.
    – DisintegratingByParts
    yesterday










  • @DisintegratingByParts I do not understand your comment.
    – Alessandro Jacopson
    yesterday















Your plane is not a subspace unless $d=0$.
– DisintegratingByParts
yesterday




Your plane is not a subspace unless $d=0$.
– DisintegratingByParts
yesterday












@DisintegratingByParts I do not understand your comment.
– Alessandro Jacopson
yesterday




@DisintegratingByParts I do not understand your comment.
– Alessandro Jacopson
yesterday










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
6
down vote



accepted










A plane is a two dimensional object, so the basis will have only two elements (two 3D vectors). In your notation $e_3$ is not part of the basis. Everything else is fine.






share|cite|improve this answer



























    up vote
    2
    down vote













    You can state all of the vectors in a plane by just two none-zeeo vectors in different directions. The set of these two vectors is called a basis for plane vector space. As you see, there are infinite bases for a plane!
    Orthogonality and orthonormality can be difined only after defining norms. Otherwise each basis see itself orthonormal, because in it's point of view the base vectors in it are normal (unit lenght) and orthogonal to each other!
    Maybe it's some strange but for understanding that you can think about seeing object from a magnifying-glass!






    share|cite|improve this answer



























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes








      up vote
      6
      down vote



      accepted










      A plane is a two dimensional object, so the basis will have only two elements (two 3D vectors). In your notation $e_3$ is not part of the basis. Everything else is fine.






      share|cite|improve this answer
























        up vote
        6
        down vote



        accepted










        A plane is a two dimensional object, so the basis will have only two elements (two 3D vectors). In your notation $e_3$ is not part of the basis. Everything else is fine.






        share|cite|improve this answer






















          up vote
          6
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          6
          down vote



          accepted






          A plane is a two dimensional object, so the basis will have only two elements (two 3D vectors). In your notation $e_3$ is not part of the basis. Everything else is fine.






          share|cite|improve this answer












          A plane is a two dimensional object, so the basis will have only two elements (two 3D vectors). In your notation $e_3$ is not part of the basis. Everything else is fine.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered 2 days ago









          Andrei

          8,6032923




          8,6032923




















              up vote
              2
              down vote













              You can state all of the vectors in a plane by just two none-zeeo vectors in different directions. The set of these two vectors is called a basis for plane vector space. As you see, there are infinite bases for a plane!
              Orthogonality and orthonormality can be difined only after defining norms. Otherwise each basis see itself orthonormal, because in it's point of view the base vectors in it are normal (unit lenght) and orthogonal to each other!
              Maybe it's some strange but for understanding that you can think about seeing object from a magnifying-glass!






              share|cite|improve this answer
























                up vote
                2
                down vote













                You can state all of the vectors in a plane by just two none-zeeo vectors in different directions. The set of these two vectors is called a basis for plane vector space. As you see, there are infinite bases for a plane!
                Orthogonality and orthonormality can be difined only after defining norms. Otherwise each basis see itself orthonormal, because in it's point of view the base vectors in it are normal (unit lenght) and orthogonal to each other!
                Maybe it's some strange but for understanding that you can think about seeing object from a magnifying-glass!






                share|cite|improve this answer






















                  up vote
                  2
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  2
                  down vote









                  You can state all of the vectors in a plane by just two none-zeeo vectors in different directions. The set of these two vectors is called a basis for plane vector space. As you see, there are infinite bases for a plane!
                  Orthogonality and orthonormality can be difined only after defining norms. Otherwise each basis see itself orthonormal, because in it's point of view the base vectors in it are normal (unit lenght) and orthogonal to each other!
                  Maybe it's some strange but for understanding that you can think about seeing object from a magnifying-glass!






                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  You can state all of the vectors in a plane by just two none-zeeo vectors in different directions. The set of these two vectors is called a basis for plane vector space. As you see, there are infinite bases for a plane!
                  Orthogonality and orthonormality can be difined only after defining norms. Otherwise each basis see itself orthonormal, because in it's point of view the base vectors in it are normal (unit lenght) and orthogonal to each other!
                  Maybe it's some strange but for understanding that you can think about seeing object from a magnifying-glass!







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered 2 days ago









                  Hossein Sharif

                  314




                  314












                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Peggy Mitchell

                      Palaiologos

                      The Forum (Inglewood, California)