Understanding a non-autonomous ODE

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
3
down vote

favorite
1












Consider $x'(t) = a(t)x$



a) Find a formula involving integrals for the solution of this system.
b) Prove that your formula gives the general solution of this system.



I am new to ODE's and we have gone over integrating the system...
$x'/x = a(t)$ in order to attempt to isolate x in terms of $t$. I thus get $log(x) = 0.5at^2+C ; text(a constant)$, which yields $x(t) = e^(.5at^2+C)$, not sure if I'm right here. I'm also not sure why it says "involving integrals," making it sound like the solution needs integral signs in it?



For part b, I have no idea how to even start it, not sure what I need to show.



Any help appreciated!










share|cite|improve this question



















  • 1




    The right hand side is wrong. $a(t)$ is a function of $t$, so its integral is not $0.5 at^2$ (that is the integral of $a$ times $t$).
    – rpa
    yesterday










  • I edited your question to get the $LaTeX$ working properly. Remember to enclose your math with "$" signs; thus "$ int_a^b f(t) ;dt$" produces $int_a^b f(t) ; dt$. Cheers!
    – Robert Lewis
    yesterday











  • Also, rpa is right!
    – Robert Lewis
    yesterday














up vote
3
down vote

favorite
1












Consider $x'(t) = a(t)x$



a) Find a formula involving integrals for the solution of this system.
b) Prove that your formula gives the general solution of this system.



I am new to ODE's and we have gone over integrating the system...
$x'/x = a(t)$ in order to attempt to isolate x in terms of $t$. I thus get $log(x) = 0.5at^2+C ; text(a constant)$, which yields $x(t) = e^(.5at^2+C)$, not sure if I'm right here. I'm also not sure why it says "involving integrals," making it sound like the solution needs integral signs in it?



For part b, I have no idea how to even start it, not sure what I need to show.



Any help appreciated!










share|cite|improve this question



















  • 1




    The right hand side is wrong. $a(t)$ is a function of $t$, so its integral is not $0.5 at^2$ (that is the integral of $a$ times $t$).
    – rpa
    yesterday










  • I edited your question to get the $LaTeX$ working properly. Remember to enclose your math with "$" signs; thus "$ int_a^b f(t) ;dt$" produces $int_a^b f(t) ; dt$. Cheers!
    – Robert Lewis
    yesterday











  • Also, rpa is right!
    – Robert Lewis
    yesterday












up vote
3
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
3
down vote

favorite
1






1





Consider $x'(t) = a(t)x$



a) Find a formula involving integrals for the solution of this system.
b) Prove that your formula gives the general solution of this system.



I am new to ODE's and we have gone over integrating the system...
$x'/x = a(t)$ in order to attempt to isolate x in terms of $t$. I thus get $log(x) = 0.5at^2+C ; text(a constant)$, which yields $x(t) = e^(.5at^2+C)$, not sure if I'm right here. I'm also not sure why it says "involving integrals," making it sound like the solution needs integral signs in it?



For part b, I have no idea how to even start it, not sure what I need to show.



Any help appreciated!










share|cite|improve this question















Consider $x'(t) = a(t)x$



a) Find a formula involving integrals for the solution of this system.
b) Prove that your formula gives the general solution of this system.



I am new to ODE's and we have gone over integrating the system...
$x'/x = a(t)$ in order to attempt to isolate x in terms of $t$. I thus get $log(x) = 0.5at^2+C ; text(a constant)$, which yields $x(t) = e^(.5at^2+C)$, not sure if I'm right here. I'm also not sure why it says "involving integrals," making it sound like the solution needs integral signs in it?



For part b, I have no idea how to even start it, not sure what I need to show.



Any help appreciated!







differential-equations






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited yesterday









Robert Lewis

40k22459




40k22459










asked 2 days ago









MathGuyForLife

484




484







  • 1




    The right hand side is wrong. $a(t)$ is a function of $t$, so its integral is not $0.5 at^2$ (that is the integral of $a$ times $t$).
    – rpa
    yesterday










  • I edited your question to get the $LaTeX$ working properly. Remember to enclose your math with "$" signs; thus "$ int_a^b f(t) ;dt$" produces $int_a^b f(t) ; dt$. Cheers!
    – Robert Lewis
    yesterday











  • Also, rpa is right!
    – Robert Lewis
    yesterday












  • 1




    The right hand side is wrong. $a(t)$ is a function of $t$, so its integral is not $0.5 at^2$ (that is the integral of $a$ times $t$).
    – rpa
    yesterday










  • I edited your question to get the $LaTeX$ working properly. Remember to enclose your math with "$" signs; thus "$ int_a^b f(t) ;dt$" produces $int_a^b f(t) ; dt$. Cheers!
    – Robert Lewis
    yesterday











  • Also, rpa is right!
    – Robert Lewis
    yesterday







1




1




The right hand side is wrong. $a(t)$ is a function of $t$, so its integral is not $0.5 at^2$ (that is the integral of $a$ times $t$).
– rpa
yesterday




The right hand side is wrong. $a(t)$ is a function of $t$, so its integral is not $0.5 at^2$ (that is the integral of $a$ times $t$).
– rpa
yesterday












I edited your question to get the $LaTeX$ working properly. Remember to enclose your math with "$" signs; thus "$ int_a^b f(t) ;dt$" produces $int_a^b f(t) ; dt$. Cheers!
– Robert Lewis
yesterday





I edited your question to get the $LaTeX$ working properly. Remember to enclose your math with "$" signs; thus "$ int_a^b f(t) ;dt$" produces $int_a^b f(t) ; dt$. Cheers!
– Robert Lewis
yesterday













Also, rpa is right!
– Robert Lewis
yesterday




Also, rpa is right!
– Robert Lewis
yesterday










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
4
down vote



accepted










From



$x'(t) = a(t)x(t) tag 1$



we write



$(ln x(t))' = dfracx'(t)x(t) = a(t); tag 2$



whence



$ln left ( dfracx(t)x(t_0) right ) = ln x(t) - ln x(t_0) = displaystyle int_t_0^t dfracx'(t)x(t) ; dt = int_t_0^t a(t) ; dt, tag 3$



or



$dfracx(t)x(t_0) = exp left ( displaystyle int_t_0^t a(t) ; dt right ), tag 4$



or



$x(t) = x(t_0) exp left ( displaystyle int_t_0^t a(t) ; dt right ), tag 5$



which solves part (a).



We note that the division by $x(t)$ occurring in (2) is legitimate when $x(t) ne 0$. If $x(t_0) = 0$ for some $t_0$, then $x(t) = 0$ is the unique solution to (1) with $x(t_0) = 0$. Therefore a solution initialized with $x(t_0) > 0$ will remain positive for all $t$; likewise a solution with $x(t_0) < 0$ will remain negative, and thus step (2) is valid, as is corroborated by equation (5).



For part (b) We have shown that $x(t)$ satisfying (1) with $x(t_0) ne 0$ at some $t$ must be of the form (5); (5) is a necessary condition for (1) to apply. Therefore, (5), being the only solution, is completely general in the sense that it binds for any initial condition $x(t_0)$; it is as general as one could wish.






share|cite|improve this answer



























    up vote
    2
    down vote













    If you have $$x'(t) = a(t),x(t)$$ then
    $$fracx'(t)x(t)=a(t)$$
    $$intfracx'(t)x(t),dt=int a(t),dt implies log (|x(t)|)=int a(t),dt+Cimplies x(t)=C , e^int a(t),dt $$






    share|cite|improve this answer




















      Your Answer




      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      );
      );
      , "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: false,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













       

      draft saved


      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2945222%2funderstanding-a-non-autonomous-ode%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest






























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes








      up vote
      4
      down vote



      accepted










      From



      $x'(t) = a(t)x(t) tag 1$



      we write



      $(ln x(t))' = dfracx'(t)x(t) = a(t); tag 2$



      whence



      $ln left ( dfracx(t)x(t_0) right ) = ln x(t) - ln x(t_0) = displaystyle int_t_0^t dfracx'(t)x(t) ; dt = int_t_0^t a(t) ; dt, tag 3$



      or



      $dfracx(t)x(t_0) = exp left ( displaystyle int_t_0^t a(t) ; dt right ), tag 4$



      or



      $x(t) = x(t_0) exp left ( displaystyle int_t_0^t a(t) ; dt right ), tag 5$



      which solves part (a).



      We note that the division by $x(t)$ occurring in (2) is legitimate when $x(t) ne 0$. If $x(t_0) = 0$ for some $t_0$, then $x(t) = 0$ is the unique solution to (1) with $x(t_0) = 0$. Therefore a solution initialized with $x(t_0) > 0$ will remain positive for all $t$; likewise a solution with $x(t_0) < 0$ will remain negative, and thus step (2) is valid, as is corroborated by equation (5).



      For part (b) We have shown that $x(t)$ satisfying (1) with $x(t_0) ne 0$ at some $t$ must be of the form (5); (5) is a necessary condition for (1) to apply. Therefore, (5), being the only solution, is completely general in the sense that it binds for any initial condition $x(t_0)$; it is as general as one could wish.






      share|cite|improve this answer
























        up vote
        4
        down vote



        accepted










        From



        $x'(t) = a(t)x(t) tag 1$



        we write



        $(ln x(t))' = dfracx'(t)x(t) = a(t); tag 2$



        whence



        $ln left ( dfracx(t)x(t_0) right ) = ln x(t) - ln x(t_0) = displaystyle int_t_0^t dfracx'(t)x(t) ; dt = int_t_0^t a(t) ; dt, tag 3$



        or



        $dfracx(t)x(t_0) = exp left ( displaystyle int_t_0^t a(t) ; dt right ), tag 4$



        or



        $x(t) = x(t_0) exp left ( displaystyle int_t_0^t a(t) ; dt right ), tag 5$



        which solves part (a).



        We note that the division by $x(t)$ occurring in (2) is legitimate when $x(t) ne 0$. If $x(t_0) = 0$ for some $t_0$, then $x(t) = 0$ is the unique solution to (1) with $x(t_0) = 0$. Therefore a solution initialized with $x(t_0) > 0$ will remain positive for all $t$; likewise a solution with $x(t_0) < 0$ will remain negative, and thus step (2) is valid, as is corroborated by equation (5).



        For part (b) We have shown that $x(t)$ satisfying (1) with $x(t_0) ne 0$ at some $t$ must be of the form (5); (5) is a necessary condition for (1) to apply. Therefore, (5), being the only solution, is completely general in the sense that it binds for any initial condition $x(t_0)$; it is as general as one could wish.






        share|cite|improve this answer






















          up vote
          4
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          4
          down vote



          accepted






          From



          $x'(t) = a(t)x(t) tag 1$



          we write



          $(ln x(t))' = dfracx'(t)x(t) = a(t); tag 2$



          whence



          $ln left ( dfracx(t)x(t_0) right ) = ln x(t) - ln x(t_0) = displaystyle int_t_0^t dfracx'(t)x(t) ; dt = int_t_0^t a(t) ; dt, tag 3$



          or



          $dfracx(t)x(t_0) = exp left ( displaystyle int_t_0^t a(t) ; dt right ), tag 4$



          or



          $x(t) = x(t_0) exp left ( displaystyle int_t_0^t a(t) ; dt right ), tag 5$



          which solves part (a).



          We note that the division by $x(t)$ occurring in (2) is legitimate when $x(t) ne 0$. If $x(t_0) = 0$ for some $t_0$, then $x(t) = 0$ is the unique solution to (1) with $x(t_0) = 0$. Therefore a solution initialized with $x(t_0) > 0$ will remain positive for all $t$; likewise a solution with $x(t_0) < 0$ will remain negative, and thus step (2) is valid, as is corroborated by equation (5).



          For part (b) We have shown that $x(t)$ satisfying (1) with $x(t_0) ne 0$ at some $t$ must be of the form (5); (5) is a necessary condition for (1) to apply. Therefore, (5), being the only solution, is completely general in the sense that it binds for any initial condition $x(t_0)$; it is as general as one could wish.






          share|cite|improve this answer












          From



          $x'(t) = a(t)x(t) tag 1$



          we write



          $(ln x(t))' = dfracx'(t)x(t) = a(t); tag 2$



          whence



          $ln left ( dfracx(t)x(t_0) right ) = ln x(t) - ln x(t_0) = displaystyle int_t_0^t dfracx'(t)x(t) ; dt = int_t_0^t a(t) ; dt, tag 3$



          or



          $dfracx(t)x(t_0) = exp left ( displaystyle int_t_0^t a(t) ; dt right ), tag 4$



          or



          $x(t) = x(t_0) exp left ( displaystyle int_t_0^t a(t) ; dt right ), tag 5$



          which solves part (a).



          We note that the division by $x(t)$ occurring in (2) is legitimate when $x(t) ne 0$. If $x(t_0) = 0$ for some $t_0$, then $x(t) = 0$ is the unique solution to (1) with $x(t_0) = 0$. Therefore a solution initialized with $x(t_0) > 0$ will remain positive for all $t$; likewise a solution with $x(t_0) < 0$ will remain negative, and thus step (2) is valid, as is corroborated by equation (5).



          For part (b) We have shown that $x(t)$ satisfying (1) with $x(t_0) ne 0$ at some $t$ must be of the form (5); (5) is a necessary condition for (1) to apply. Therefore, (5), being the only solution, is completely general in the sense that it binds for any initial condition $x(t_0)$; it is as general as one could wish.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered yesterday









          Robert Lewis

          40k22459




          40k22459




















              up vote
              2
              down vote













              If you have $$x'(t) = a(t),x(t)$$ then
              $$fracx'(t)x(t)=a(t)$$
              $$intfracx'(t)x(t),dt=int a(t),dt implies log (|x(t)|)=int a(t),dt+Cimplies x(t)=C , e^int a(t),dt $$






              share|cite|improve this answer
























                up vote
                2
                down vote













                If you have $$x'(t) = a(t),x(t)$$ then
                $$fracx'(t)x(t)=a(t)$$
                $$intfracx'(t)x(t),dt=int a(t),dt implies log (|x(t)|)=int a(t),dt+Cimplies x(t)=C , e^int a(t),dt $$






                share|cite|improve this answer






















                  up vote
                  2
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  2
                  down vote









                  If you have $$x'(t) = a(t),x(t)$$ then
                  $$fracx'(t)x(t)=a(t)$$
                  $$intfracx'(t)x(t),dt=int a(t),dt implies log (|x(t)|)=int a(t),dt+Cimplies x(t)=C , e^int a(t),dt $$






                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  If you have $$x'(t) = a(t),x(t)$$ then
                  $$fracx'(t)x(t)=a(t)$$
                  $$intfracx'(t)x(t),dt=int a(t),dt implies log (|x(t)|)=int a(t),dt+Cimplies x(t)=C , e^int a(t),dt $$







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered yesterday









                  Claude Leibovici

                  114k1155129




                  114k1155129



























                       

                      draft saved


                      draft discarded















































                       


                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2945222%2funderstanding-a-non-autonomous-ode%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest













































































                      Popular posts from this blog

                      How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

                      Displaying single band from multi-band raster using QGIS

                      How many registers does an x86_64 CPU actually have?