Understanding a non-autonomous ODE

Multi tool use
Multi tool use

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
3
down vote

favorite
1












Consider $x'(t) = a(t)x$



a) Find a formula involving integrals for the solution of this system.
b) Prove that your formula gives the general solution of this system.



I am new to ODE's and we have gone over integrating the system...
$x'/x = a(t)$ in order to attempt to isolate x in terms of $t$. I thus get $log(x) = 0.5at^2+C ; text(a constant)$, which yields $x(t) = e^(.5at^2+C)$, not sure if I'm right here. I'm also not sure why it says "involving integrals," making it sound like the solution needs integral signs in it?



For part b, I have no idea how to even start it, not sure what I need to show.



Any help appreciated!










share|cite|improve this question



















  • 1




    The right hand side is wrong. $a(t)$ is a function of $t$, so its integral is not $0.5 at^2$ (that is the integral of $a$ times $t$).
    – rpa
    yesterday










  • I edited your question to get the $LaTeX$ working properly. Remember to enclose your math with "$" signs; thus "$ int_a^b f(t) ;dt$" produces $int_a^b f(t) ; dt$. Cheers!
    – Robert Lewis
    yesterday











  • Also, rpa is right!
    – Robert Lewis
    yesterday














up vote
3
down vote

favorite
1












Consider $x'(t) = a(t)x$



a) Find a formula involving integrals for the solution of this system.
b) Prove that your formula gives the general solution of this system.



I am new to ODE's and we have gone over integrating the system...
$x'/x = a(t)$ in order to attempt to isolate x in terms of $t$. I thus get $log(x) = 0.5at^2+C ; text(a constant)$, which yields $x(t) = e^(.5at^2+C)$, not sure if I'm right here. I'm also not sure why it says "involving integrals," making it sound like the solution needs integral signs in it?



For part b, I have no idea how to even start it, not sure what I need to show.



Any help appreciated!










share|cite|improve this question



















  • 1




    The right hand side is wrong. $a(t)$ is a function of $t$, so its integral is not $0.5 at^2$ (that is the integral of $a$ times $t$).
    – rpa
    yesterday










  • I edited your question to get the $LaTeX$ working properly. Remember to enclose your math with "$" signs; thus "$ int_a^b f(t) ;dt$" produces $int_a^b f(t) ; dt$. Cheers!
    – Robert Lewis
    yesterday











  • Also, rpa is right!
    – Robert Lewis
    yesterday












up vote
3
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
3
down vote

favorite
1






1





Consider $x'(t) = a(t)x$



a) Find a formula involving integrals for the solution of this system.
b) Prove that your formula gives the general solution of this system.



I am new to ODE's and we have gone over integrating the system...
$x'/x = a(t)$ in order to attempt to isolate x in terms of $t$. I thus get $log(x) = 0.5at^2+C ; text(a constant)$, which yields $x(t) = e^(.5at^2+C)$, not sure if I'm right here. I'm also not sure why it says "involving integrals," making it sound like the solution needs integral signs in it?



For part b, I have no idea how to even start it, not sure what I need to show.



Any help appreciated!










share|cite|improve this question















Consider $x'(t) = a(t)x$



a) Find a formula involving integrals for the solution of this system.
b) Prove that your formula gives the general solution of this system.



I am new to ODE's and we have gone over integrating the system...
$x'/x = a(t)$ in order to attempt to isolate x in terms of $t$. I thus get $log(x) = 0.5at^2+C ; text(a constant)$, which yields $x(t) = e^(.5at^2+C)$, not sure if I'm right here. I'm also not sure why it says "involving integrals," making it sound like the solution needs integral signs in it?



For part b, I have no idea how to even start it, not sure what I need to show.



Any help appreciated!







differential-equations






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited yesterday









Robert Lewis

40k22459




40k22459










asked 2 days ago









MathGuyForLife

484




484







  • 1




    The right hand side is wrong. $a(t)$ is a function of $t$, so its integral is not $0.5 at^2$ (that is the integral of $a$ times $t$).
    – rpa
    yesterday










  • I edited your question to get the $LaTeX$ working properly. Remember to enclose your math with "$" signs; thus "$ int_a^b f(t) ;dt$" produces $int_a^b f(t) ; dt$. Cheers!
    – Robert Lewis
    yesterday











  • Also, rpa is right!
    – Robert Lewis
    yesterday












  • 1




    The right hand side is wrong. $a(t)$ is a function of $t$, so its integral is not $0.5 at^2$ (that is the integral of $a$ times $t$).
    – rpa
    yesterday










  • I edited your question to get the $LaTeX$ working properly. Remember to enclose your math with "$" signs; thus "$ int_a^b f(t) ;dt$" produces $int_a^b f(t) ; dt$. Cheers!
    – Robert Lewis
    yesterday











  • Also, rpa is right!
    – Robert Lewis
    yesterday







1




1




The right hand side is wrong. $a(t)$ is a function of $t$, so its integral is not $0.5 at^2$ (that is the integral of $a$ times $t$).
– rpa
yesterday




The right hand side is wrong. $a(t)$ is a function of $t$, so its integral is not $0.5 at^2$ (that is the integral of $a$ times $t$).
– rpa
yesterday












I edited your question to get the $LaTeX$ working properly. Remember to enclose your math with "$" signs; thus "$ int_a^b f(t) ;dt$" produces $int_a^b f(t) ; dt$. Cheers!
– Robert Lewis
yesterday





I edited your question to get the $LaTeX$ working properly. Remember to enclose your math with "$" signs; thus "$ int_a^b f(t) ;dt$" produces $int_a^b f(t) ; dt$. Cheers!
– Robert Lewis
yesterday













Also, rpa is right!
– Robert Lewis
yesterday




Also, rpa is right!
– Robert Lewis
yesterday










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
4
down vote



accepted










From



$x'(t) = a(t)x(t) tag 1$



we write



$(ln x(t))' = dfracx'(t)x(t) = a(t); tag 2$



whence



$ln left ( dfracx(t)x(t_0) right ) = ln x(t) - ln x(t_0) = displaystyle int_t_0^t dfracx'(t)x(t) ; dt = int_t_0^t a(t) ; dt, tag 3$



or



$dfracx(t)x(t_0) = exp left ( displaystyle int_t_0^t a(t) ; dt right ), tag 4$



or



$x(t) = x(t_0) exp left ( displaystyle int_t_0^t a(t) ; dt right ), tag 5$



which solves part (a).



We note that the division by $x(t)$ occurring in (2) is legitimate when $x(t) ne 0$. If $x(t_0) = 0$ for some $t_0$, then $x(t) = 0$ is the unique solution to (1) with $x(t_0) = 0$. Therefore a solution initialized with $x(t_0) > 0$ will remain positive for all $t$; likewise a solution with $x(t_0) < 0$ will remain negative, and thus step (2) is valid, as is corroborated by equation (5).



For part (b) We have shown that $x(t)$ satisfying (1) with $x(t_0) ne 0$ at some $t$ must be of the form (5); (5) is a necessary condition for (1) to apply. Therefore, (5), being the only solution, is completely general in the sense that it binds for any initial condition $x(t_0)$; it is as general as one could wish.






share|cite|improve this answer



























    up vote
    2
    down vote













    If you have $$x'(t) = a(t),x(t)$$ then
    $$fracx'(t)x(t)=a(t)$$
    $$intfracx'(t)x(t),dt=int a(t),dt implies log (|x(t)|)=int a(t),dt+Cimplies x(t)=C , e^int a(t),dt $$






    share|cite|improve this answer




















      Your Answer




      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      );
      );
      , "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: false,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













       

      draft saved


      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2945222%2funderstanding-a-non-autonomous-ode%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest






























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes








      up vote
      4
      down vote



      accepted










      From



      $x'(t) = a(t)x(t) tag 1$



      we write



      $(ln x(t))' = dfracx'(t)x(t) = a(t); tag 2$



      whence



      $ln left ( dfracx(t)x(t_0) right ) = ln x(t) - ln x(t_0) = displaystyle int_t_0^t dfracx'(t)x(t) ; dt = int_t_0^t a(t) ; dt, tag 3$



      or



      $dfracx(t)x(t_0) = exp left ( displaystyle int_t_0^t a(t) ; dt right ), tag 4$



      or



      $x(t) = x(t_0) exp left ( displaystyle int_t_0^t a(t) ; dt right ), tag 5$



      which solves part (a).



      We note that the division by $x(t)$ occurring in (2) is legitimate when $x(t) ne 0$. If $x(t_0) = 0$ for some $t_0$, then $x(t) = 0$ is the unique solution to (1) with $x(t_0) = 0$. Therefore a solution initialized with $x(t_0) > 0$ will remain positive for all $t$; likewise a solution with $x(t_0) < 0$ will remain negative, and thus step (2) is valid, as is corroborated by equation (5).



      For part (b) We have shown that $x(t)$ satisfying (1) with $x(t_0) ne 0$ at some $t$ must be of the form (5); (5) is a necessary condition for (1) to apply. Therefore, (5), being the only solution, is completely general in the sense that it binds for any initial condition $x(t_0)$; it is as general as one could wish.






      share|cite|improve this answer
























        up vote
        4
        down vote



        accepted










        From



        $x'(t) = a(t)x(t) tag 1$



        we write



        $(ln x(t))' = dfracx'(t)x(t) = a(t); tag 2$



        whence



        $ln left ( dfracx(t)x(t_0) right ) = ln x(t) - ln x(t_0) = displaystyle int_t_0^t dfracx'(t)x(t) ; dt = int_t_0^t a(t) ; dt, tag 3$



        or



        $dfracx(t)x(t_0) = exp left ( displaystyle int_t_0^t a(t) ; dt right ), tag 4$



        or



        $x(t) = x(t_0) exp left ( displaystyle int_t_0^t a(t) ; dt right ), tag 5$



        which solves part (a).



        We note that the division by $x(t)$ occurring in (2) is legitimate when $x(t) ne 0$. If $x(t_0) = 0$ for some $t_0$, then $x(t) = 0$ is the unique solution to (1) with $x(t_0) = 0$. Therefore a solution initialized with $x(t_0) > 0$ will remain positive for all $t$; likewise a solution with $x(t_0) < 0$ will remain negative, and thus step (2) is valid, as is corroborated by equation (5).



        For part (b) We have shown that $x(t)$ satisfying (1) with $x(t_0) ne 0$ at some $t$ must be of the form (5); (5) is a necessary condition for (1) to apply. Therefore, (5), being the only solution, is completely general in the sense that it binds for any initial condition $x(t_0)$; it is as general as one could wish.






        share|cite|improve this answer






















          up vote
          4
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          4
          down vote



          accepted






          From



          $x'(t) = a(t)x(t) tag 1$



          we write



          $(ln x(t))' = dfracx'(t)x(t) = a(t); tag 2$



          whence



          $ln left ( dfracx(t)x(t_0) right ) = ln x(t) - ln x(t_0) = displaystyle int_t_0^t dfracx'(t)x(t) ; dt = int_t_0^t a(t) ; dt, tag 3$



          or



          $dfracx(t)x(t_0) = exp left ( displaystyle int_t_0^t a(t) ; dt right ), tag 4$



          or



          $x(t) = x(t_0) exp left ( displaystyle int_t_0^t a(t) ; dt right ), tag 5$



          which solves part (a).



          We note that the division by $x(t)$ occurring in (2) is legitimate when $x(t) ne 0$. If $x(t_0) = 0$ for some $t_0$, then $x(t) = 0$ is the unique solution to (1) with $x(t_0) = 0$. Therefore a solution initialized with $x(t_0) > 0$ will remain positive for all $t$; likewise a solution with $x(t_0) < 0$ will remain negative, and thus step (2) is valid, as is corroborated by equation (5).



          For part (b) We have shown that $x(t)$ satisfying (1) with $x(t_0) ne 0$ at some $t$ must be of the form (5); (5) is a necessary condition for (1) to apply. Therefore, (5), being the only solution, is completely general in the sense that it binds for any initial condition $x(t_0)$; it is as general as one could wish.






          share|cite|improve this answer












          From



          $x'(t) = a(t)x(t) tag 1$



          we write



          $(ln x(t))' = dfracx'(t)x(t) = a(t); tag 2$



          whence



          $ln left ( dfracx(t)x(t_0) right ) = ln x(t) - ln x(t_0) = displaystyle int_t_0^t dfracx'(t)x(t) ; dt = int_t_0^t a(t) ; dt, tag 3$



          or



          $dfracx(t)x(t_0) = exp left ( displaystyle int_t_0^t a(t) ; dt right ), tag 4$



          or



          $x(t) = x(t_0) exp left ( displaystyle int_t_0^t a(t) ; dt right ), tag 5$



          which solves part (a).



          We note that the division by $x(t)$ occurring in (2) is legitimate when $x(t) ne 0$. If $x(t_0) = 0$ for some $t_0$, then $x(t) = 0$ is the unique solution to (1) with $x(t_0) = 0$. Therefore a solution initialized with $x(t_0) > 0$ will remain positive for all $t$; likewise a solution with $x(t_0) < 0$ will remain negative, and thus step (2) is valid, as is corroborated by equation (5).



          For part (b) We have shown that $x(t)$ satisfying (1) with $x(t_0) ne 0$ at some $t$ must be of the form (5); (5) is a necessary condition for (1) to apply. Therefore, (5), being the only solution, is completely general in the sense that it binds for any initial condition $x(t_0)$; it is as general as one could wish.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered yesterday









          Robert Lewis

          40k22459




          40k22459




















              up vote
              2
              down vote













              If you have $$x'(t) = a(t),x(t)$$ then
              $$fracx'(t)x(t)=a(t)$$
              $$intfracx'(t)x(t),dt=int a(t),dt implies log (|x(t)|)=int a(t),dt+Cimplies x(t)=C , e^int a(t),dt $$






              share|cite|improve this answer
























                up vote
                2
                down vote













                If you have $$x'(t) = a(t),x(t)$$ then
                $$fracx'(t)x(t)=a(t)$$
                $$intfracx'(t)x(t),dt=int a(t),dt implies log (|x(t)|)=int a(t),dt+Cimplies x(t)=C , e^int a(t),dt $$






                share|cite|improve this answer






















                  up vote
                  2
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  2
                  down vote









                  If you have $$x'(t) = a(t),x(t)$$ then
                  $$fracx'(t)x(t)=a(t)$$
                  $$intfracx'(t)x(t),dt=int a(t),dt implies log (|x(t)|)=int a(t),dt+Cimplies x(t)=C , e^int a(t),dt $$






                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  If you have $$x'(t) = a(t),x(t)$$ then
                  $$fracx'(t)x(t)=a(t)$$
                  $$intfracx'(t)x(t),dt=int a(t),dt implies log (|x(t)|)=int a(t),dt+Cimplies x(t)=C , e^int a(t),dt $$







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered yesterday









                  Claude Leibovici

                  114k1155129




                  114k1155129



























                       

                      draft saved


                      draft discarded















































                       


                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2945222%2funderstanding-a-non-autonomous-ode%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest













































































                      5ynELRqdLL8LMvJ6qPlWlx 8eBy L,spVaOMh,G,iNvXbcpfV450P193L4uMq,G,6L0Tud8keAp,EUWC,05jaeymmX8FMB5O0,M 1
                      8rAXw cCj T8DmOW4V,gejA3X37 MLpk9Pi4uwSnAB6b,U,En4n7U wm sUUdu028 uuWiCzqkB,wcyJeUJBgHAxCp7CWgkBc

                      Popular posts from this blog

                      How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

                      How many registers does an x86_64 CPU actually have?

                      Displaying single band from multi-band raster using QGIS