What are the differences between qperf and ping test latency results?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I am wondering what are the differences between qperf and ping tests latency results. In terms of measuring latency between two servers which tool result could be considered more accurate?
ping:
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9002ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.187/0.308/0.730/0.144 ms
qperf:
tcp_lat:
latency = 55.5 us
msg_rate = 18 K/sec
loc_send_bytes = 18 KB
loc_recv_bytes = 18 KB
loc_send_msgs = 18,031
loc_recv_msgs = 18,030
rem_send_bytes = 18 KB
rem_recv_bytes = 18 KB
rem_send_msgs = 18,031
rem_recv_msgs = 18,031
linux networking performance latency
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I am wondering what are the differences between qperf and ping tests latency results. In terms of measuring latency between two servers which tool result could be considered more accurate?
ping:
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9002ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.187/0.308/0.730/0.144 ms
qperf:
tcp_lat:
latency = 55.5 us
msg_rate = 18 K/sec
loc_send_bytes = 18 KB
loc_recv_bytes = 18 KB
loc_send_msgs = 18,031
loc_recv_msgs = 18,030
rem_send_bytes = 18 KB
rem_recv_bytes = 18 KB
rem_send_msgs = 18,031
rem_recv_msgs = 18,031
linux networking performance latency
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I am wondering what are the differences between qperf and ping tests latency results. In terms of measuring latency between two servers which tool result could be considered more accurate?
ping:
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9002ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.187/0.308/0.730/0.144 ms
qperf:
tcp_lat:
latency = 55.5 us
msg_rate = 18 K/sec
loc_send_bytes = 18 KB
loc_recv_bytes = 18 KB
loc_send_msgs = 18,031
loc_recv_msgs = 18,030
rem_send_bytes = 18 KB
rem_recv_bytes = 18 KB
rem_send_msgs = 18,031
rem_recv_msgs = 18,031
linux networking performance latency
I am wondering what are the differences between qperf and ping tests latency results. In terms of measuring latency between two servers which tool result could be considered more accurate?
ping:
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9002ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.187/0.308/0.730/0.144 ms
qperf:
tcp_lat:
latency = 55.5 us
msg_rate = 18 K/sec
loc_send_bytes = 18 KB
loc_recv_bytes = 18 KB
loc_send_msgs = 18,031
loc_recv_msgs = 18,030
rem_send_bytes = 18 KB
rem_recv_bytes = 18 KB
rem_send_msgs = 18,031
rem_recv_msgs = 18,031
linux networking performance latency
linux networking performance latency
edited yesterday
Rui F Ribeiro
37k1273117
37k1273117
asked yesterday
Bustam
183
183
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f473730%2fwhat-are-the-differences-between-qperf-and-ping-test-latency-results%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password