What is the experimental evidence that the nucleons are made up of three quarks?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
2
down vote

favorite












What is the experimental evidence that the nucleons are made up of three quarks? What is the point of saying that nucleons are made of quarks when there are also gluons inside it?










share|cite|improve this question

























    up vote
    2
    down vote

    favorite












    What is the experimental evidence that the nucleons are made up of three quarks? What is the point of saying that nucleons are made of quarks when there are also gluons inside it?










    share|cite|improve this question























      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite











      What is the experimental evidence that the nucleons are made up of three quarks? What is the point of saying that nucleons are made of quarks when there are also gluons inside it?










      share|cite|improve this question













      What is the experimental evidence that the nucleons are made up of three quarks? What is the point of saying that nucleons are made of quarks when there are also gluons inside it?







      particle-physics nuclear-physics quantum-chromodynamics quarks protons






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked 1 hour ago









      mithusengupta123

      1,19111130




      1,19111130




















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          2
          down vote














          What is the experimental evidence that the nucleons are made up of
          three quarks?




          Some strong pieces of evidence for the quark model of the proton and the neutron, not stated in another answer, are the magnetic moment of the proton and the magnetic moment of the neutron, which are consistent with the quark model and are inconsistent with the magnetic moment that would be predicted by quantum electrodynamics in a point particle model.




          What is the point of saying that nucleons are made of quarks when
          there are also gluons inside it?




          The reasons this is done is called in the field of science communication "lies to children".



          Complex topics are often initially taught in a manner the oversimplifies the reality in order to develop key salient points.



          Emphasizing the quark composition of the nucleons while ignoring the gluon contribution allows one to explain many key conclusions of the quark-gluon model including:



          • The charge of all of the hadrons


          • Beta decay


          • The list of all possible baryons and of all possible pseudoscalar and vector mesons


          • The full list of Standard Model fermions


          • The magnetic moment of hadrons


          • Deep inelastic scatter of hadrons


          • A formula for hadron spin


          The existence of gluons as a constituent doesn't have to be explained in detail to reach these results.



          Also, while the valence quark content of a hadron is specific to a particular kind of quark, the gluon content of a hadron is not useful for hadron taxonomy.






          share|cite|improve this answer



























            up vote
            1
            down vote













            The process that was first used to resolve the internal structure of the proton and neutron is called deep inelastic scattering. Basically, you hit the target hadron with enough energy that the probing particle's wavelength is short enough to make out the details of the internal structure of the proton or neutron.



            You are right to question the idea that a proton is "made up of three quarks" when there are gluons inside as well. The gluons are of course force-carrying particles which mediate the strong force and keep the quarks bound to one another, but because the gluons carry color charge themselves, they couple in strongly non-linear ways. The upshot is that most of the mass of a proton comes from the interaction energy of the gluons.






            share|cite|improve this answer



























              up vote
              1
              down vote













              When I was in university, sitting on my dinosaur, one of my profs mentioned he worked on a neutron polarization system on a particle accelerator at Chalk River.



              I had to ask how you polarized a neutral particle with a magnet, still thinking in terms of classical particles and charges. He explained that since there's an internal quark structure, even though the outside looks neutral there's enough asymmetry for you to work with.



              It was not until much later that I read how these actually work, there's complexity of course, but the basics are there.






              share|cite|improve this answer




















                Your Answer




                StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
                return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
                StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
                StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
                );
                );
                , "mathjax-editing");

                StackExchange.ready(function()
                var channelOptions =
                tags: "".split(" "),
                id: "151"
                ;
                initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

                StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
                // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
                if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
                StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
                createEditor();
                );

                else
                createEditor();

                );

                function createEditor()
                StackExchange.prepareEditor(
                heartbeatType: 'answer',
                convertImagesToLinks: false,
                noModals: false,
                showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
                reputationToPostImages: null,
                bindNavPrevention: true,
                postfix: "",
                noCode: true, onDemand: true,
                discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
                ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
                );



                );













                 

                draft saved


                draft discarded


















                StackExchange.ready(
                function ()
                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f434985%2fwhat-is-the-experimental-evidence-that-the-nucleons-are-made-up-of-three-quarks%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                );

                Post as a guest






























                3 Answers
                3






                active

                oldest

                votes








                3 Answers
                3






                active

                oldest

                votes









                active

                oldest

                votes






                active

                oldest

                votes








                up vote
                2
                down vote














                What is the experimental evidence that the nucleons are made up of
                three quarks?




                Some strong pieces of evidence for the quark model of the proton and the neutron, not stated in another answer, are the magnetic moment of the proton and the magnetic moment of the neutron, which are consistent with the quark model and are inconsistent with the magnetic moment that would be predicted by quantum electrodynamics in a point particle model.




                What is the point of saying that nucleons are made of quarks when
                there are also gluons inside it?




                The reasons this is done is called in the field of science communication "lies to children".



                Complex topics are often initially taught in a manner the oversimplifies the reality in order to develop key salient points.



                Emphasizing the quark composition of the nucleons while ignoring the gluon contribution allows one to explain many key conclusions of the quark-gluon model including:



                • The charge of all of the hadrons


                • Beta decay


                • The list of all possible baryons and of all possible pseudoscalar and vector mesons


                • The full list of Standard Model fermions


                • The magnetic moment of hadrons


                • Deep inelastic scatter of hadrons


                • A formula for hadron spin


                The existence of gluons as a constituent doesn't have to be explained in detail to reach these results.



                Also, while the valence quark content of a hadron is specific to a particular kind of quark, the gluon content of a hadron is not useful for hadron taxonomy.






                share|cite|improve this answer
























                  up vote
                  2
                  down vote














                  What is the experimental evidence that the nucleons are made up of
                  three quarks?




                  Some strong pieces of evidence for the quark model of the proton and the neutron, not stated in another answer, are the magnetic moment of the proton and the magnetic moment of the neutron, which are consistent with the quark model and are inconsistent with the magnetic moment that would be predicted by quantum electrodynamics in a point particle model.




                  What is the point of saying that nucleons are made of quarks when
                  there are also gluons inside it?




                  The reasons this is done is called in the field of science communication "lies to children".



                  Complex topics are often initially taught in a manner the oversimplifies the reality in order to develop key salient points.



                  Emphasizing the quark composition of the nucleons while ignoring the gluon contribution allows one to explain many key conclusions of the quark-gluon model including:



                  • The charge of all of the hadrons


                  • Beta decay


                  • The list of all possible baryons and of all possible pseudoscalar and vector mesons


                  • The full list of Standard Model fermions


                  • The magnetic moment of hadrons


                  • Deep inelastic scatter of hadrons


                  • A formula for hadron spin


                  The existence of gluons as a constituent doesn't have to be explained in detail to reach these results.



                  Also, while the valence quark content of a hadron is specific to a particular kind of quark, the gluon content of a hadron is not useful for hadron taxonomy.






                  share|cite|improve this answer






















                    up vote
                    2
                    down vote










                    up vote
                    2
                    down vote










                    What is the experimental evidence that the nucleons are made up of
                    three quarks?




                    Some strong pieces of evidence for the quark model of the proton and the neutron, not stated in another answer, are the magnetic moment of the proton and the magnetic moment of the neutron, which are consistent with the quark model and are inconsistent with the magnetic moment that would be predicted by quantum electrodynamics in a point particle model.




                    What is the point of saying that nucleons are made of quarks when
                    there are also gluons inside it?




                    The reasons this is done is called in the field of science communication "lies to children".



                    Complex topics are often initially taught in a manner the oversimplifies the reality in order to develop key salient points.



                    Emphasizing the quark composition of the nucleons while ignoring the gluon contribution allows one to explain many key conclusions of the quark-gluon model including:



                    • The charge of all of the hadrons


                    • Beta decay


                    • The list of all possible baryons and of all possible pseudoscalar and vector mesons


                    • The full list of Standard Model fermions


                    • The magnetic moment of hadrons


                    • Deep inelastic scatter of hadrons


                    • A formula for hadron spin


                    The existence of gluons as a constituent doesn't have to be explained in detail to reach these results.



                    Also, while the valence quark content of a hadron is specific to a particular kind of quark, the gluon content of a hadron is not useful for hadron taxonomy.






                    share|cite|improve this answer













                    What is the experimental evidence that the nucleons are made up of
                    three quarks?




                    Some strong pieces of evidence for the quark model of the proton and the neutron, not stated in another answer, are the magnetic moment of the proton and the magnetic moment of the neutron, which are consistent with the quark model and are inconsistent with the magnetic moment that would be predicted by quantum electrodynamics in a point particle model.




                    What is the point of saying that nucleons are made of quarks when
                    there are also gluons inside it?




                    The reasons this is done is called in the field of science communication "lies to children".



                    Complex topics are often initially taught in a manner the oversimplifies the reality in order to develop key salient points.



                    Emphasizing the quark composition of the nucleons while ignoring the gluon contribution allows one to explain many key conclusions of the quark-gluon model including:



                    • The charge of all of the hadrons


                    • Beta decay


                    • The list of all possible baryons and of all possible pseudoscalar and vector mesons


                    • The full list of Standard Model fermions


                    • The magnetic moment of hadrons


                    • Deep inelastic scatter of hadrons


                    • A formula for hadron spin


                    The existence of gluons as a constituent doesn't have to be explained in detail to reach these results.



                    Also, while the valence quark content of a hadron is specific to a particular kind of quark, the gluon content of a hadron is not useful for hadron taxonomy.







                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    answered 1 hour ago









                    ohwilleke

                    1,238621




                    1,238621




















                        up vote
                        1
                        down vote













                        The process that was first used to resolve the internal structure of the proton and neutron is called deep inelastic scattering. Basically, you hit the target hadron with enough energy that the probing particle's wavelength is short enough to make out the details of the internal structure of the proton or neutron.



                        You are right to question the idea that a proton is "made up of three quarks" when there are gluons inside as well. The gluons are of course force-carrying particles which mediate the strong force and keep the quarks bound to one another, but because the gluons carry color charge themselves, they couple in strongly non-linear ways. The upshot is that most of the mass of a proton comes from the interaction energy of the gluons.






                        share|cite|improve this answer
























                          up vote
                          1
                          down vote













                          The process that was first used to resolve the internal structure of the proton and neutron is called deep inelastic scattering. Basically, you hit the target hadron with enough energy that the probing particle's wavelength is short enough to make out the details of the internal structure of the proton or neutron.



                          You are right to question the idea that a proton is "made up of three quarks" when there are gluons inside as well. The gluons are of course force-carrying particles which mediate the strong force and keep the quarks bound to one another, but because the gluons carry color charge themselves, they couple in strongly non-linear ways. The upshot is that most of the mass of a proton comes from the interaction energy of the gluons.






                          share|cite|improve this answer






















                            up vote
                            1
                            down vote










                            up vote
                            1
                            down vote









                            The process that was first used to resolve the internal structure of the proton and neutron is called deep inelastic scattering. Basically, you hit the target hadron with enough energy that the probing particle's wavelength is short enough to make out the details of the internal structure of the proton or neutron.



                            You are right to question the idea that a proton is "made up of three quarks" when there are gluons inside as well. The gluons are of course force-carrying particles which mediate the strong force and keep the quarks bound to one another, but because the gluons carry color charge themselves, they couple in strongly non-linear ways. The upshot is that most of the mass of a proton comes from the interaction energy of the gluons.






                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            The process that was first used to resolve the internal structure of the proton and neutron is called deep inelastic scattering. Basically, you hit the target hadron with enough energy that the probing particle's wavelength is short enough to make out the details of the internal structure of the proton or neutron.



                            You are right to question the idea that a proton is "made up of three quarks" when there are gluons inside as well. The gluons are of course force-carrying particles which mediate the strong force and keep the quarks bound to one another, but because the gluons carry color charge themselves, they couple in strongly non-linear ways. The upshot is that most of the mass of a proton comes from the interaction energy of the gluons.







                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer










                            answered 1 hour ago









                            Geoffrey

                            3,52911028




                            3,52911028




















                                up vote
                                1
                                down vote













                                When I was in university, sitting on my dinosaur, one of my profs mentioned he worked on a neutron polarization system on a particle accelerator at Chalk River.



                                I had to ask how you polarized a neutral particle with a magnet, still thinking in terms of classical particles and charges. He explained that since there's an internal quark structure, even though the outside looks neutral there's enough asymmetry for you to work with.



                                It was not until much later that I read how these actually work, there's complexity of course, but the basics are there.






                                share|cite|improve this answer
























                                  up vote
                                  1
                                  down vote













                                  When I was in university, sitting on my dinosaur, one of my profs mentioned he worked on a neutron polarization system on a particle accelerator at Chalk River.



                                  I had to ask how you polarized a neutral particle with a magnet, still thinking in terms of classical particles and charges. He explained that since there's an internal quark structure, even though the outside looks neutral there's enough asymmetry for you to work with.



                                  It was not until much later that I read how these actually work, there's complexity of course, but the basics are there.






                                  share|cite|improve this answer






















                                    up vote
                                    1
                                    down vote










                                    up vote
                                    1
                                    down vote









                                    When I was in university, sitting on my dinosaur, one of my profs mentioned he worked on a neutron polarization system on a particle accelerator at Chalk River.



                                    I had to ask how you polarized a neutral particle with a magnet, still thinking in terms of classical particles and charges. He explained that since there's an internal quark structure, even though the outside looks neutral there's enough asymmetry for you to work with.



                                    It was not until much later that I read how these actually work, there's complexity of course, but the basics are there.






                                    share|cite|improve this answer












                                    When I was in university, sitting on my dinosaur, one of my profs mentioned he worked on a neutron polarization system on a particle accelerator at Chalk River.



                                    I had to ask how you polarized a neutral particle with a magnet, still thinking in terms of classical particles and charges. He explained that since there's an internal quark structure, even though the outside looks neutral there's enough asymmetry for you to work with.



                                    It was not until much later that I read how these actually work, there's complexity of course, but the basics are there.







                                    share|cite|improve this answer












                                    share|cite|improve this answer



                                    share|cite|improve this answer










                                    answered 44 mins ago









                                    Maury Markowitz

                                    2,011418




                                    2,011418



























                                         

                                        draft saved


                                        draft discarded















































                                         


                                        draft saved


                                        draft discarded














                                        StackExchange.ready(
                                        function ()
                                        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f434985%2fwhat-is-the-experimental-evidence-that-the-nucleons-are-made-up-of-three-quarks%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                        );

                                        Post as a guest













































































                                        Popular posts from this blog

                                        How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

                                        Displaying single band from multi-band raster using QGIS

                                        How many registers does an x86_64 CPU actually have?