What is this effect and how can I remove it?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












As you have deduced from the title, there's a strange ghosting effect in this photo (actually quite a few of my recent photos), when I used built-in camera flash.
Is it caused just by a slow shutter speed?



EXIF: f/5.6, ISO 400 and 1/60 sec.



enter image description here






effect







share|improve this question

























    up vote
    1
    down vote

    favorite












    As you have deduced from the title, there's a strange ghosting effect in this photo (actually quite a few of my recent photos), when I used built-in camera flash.
    Is it caused just by a slow shutter speed?



    EXIF: f/5.6, ISO 400 and 1/60 sec.



    enter image description here






    effect







    share|improve this question























      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite











      As you have deduced from the title, there's a strange ghosting effect in this photo (actually quite a few of my recent photos), when I used built-in camera flash.
      Is it caused just by a slow shutter speed?



      EXIF: f/5.6, ISO 400 and 1/60 sec.



      enter image description here






      effect







      share|improve this question













      As you have deduced from the title, there's a strange ghosting effect in this photo (actually quite a few of my recent photos), when I used built-in camera flash.
      Is it caused just by a slow shutter speed?



      EXIF: f/5.6, ISO 400 and 1/60 sec.



      enter image description here






      effect




      effect






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 1 hour ago









      bearmohawk

      378117




      378117




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted










          For me this is motion blur. And because is the same on all the objects edges it is caused by slow shutter speed. Try to use 1/100, 1/160.



          Also you should know internal flash usually have very limited power and range. So the other advice I can give you (if you often take photos in low light) is to invest in external flashlight.






          share|improve this answer
















          • 1




            thanks! I thought that was it.
            – bearmohawk
            58 mins ago

















          up vote
          2
          down vote













          To be a bit more specific, this is the superposition of



          • a very short exposure with flash, the clear sharp part

          • overlaid by an underexposed long exposure shot (the blurry part)

          However, the amount of motion blur for a 1/60 shot is unusually large, so you likely took the picture from far away. This would also explain why the blurred part is so visible, your flash was too far from the subject and didn't make much difference with the ambient light.






          share|improve this answer




















            Your Answer







            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "61"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: false,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphoto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f102155%2fwhat-is-this-effect-and-how-can-i-remove-it%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest

















            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            2
            down vote



            accepted










            For me this is motion blur. And because is the same on all the objects edges it is caused by slow shutter speed. Try to use 1/100, 1/160.



            Also you should know internal flash usually have very limited power and range. So the other advice I can give you (if you often take photos in low light) is to invest in external flashlight.






            share|improve this answer
















            • 1




              thanks! I thought that was it.
              – bearmohawk
              58 mins ago














            up vote
            2
            down vote



            accepted










            For me this is motion blur. And because is the same on all the objects edges it is caused by slow shutter speed. Try to use 1/100, 1/160.



            Also you should know internal flash usually have very limited power and range. So the other advice I can give you (if you often take photos in low light) is to invest in external flashlight.






            share|improve this answer
















            • 1




              thanks! I thought that was it.
              – bearmohawk
              58 mins ago












            up vote
            2
            down vote



            accepted







            up vote
            2
            down vote



            accepted






            For me this is motion blur. And because is the same on all the objects edges it is caused by slow shutter speed. Try to use 1/100, 1/160.



            Also you should know internal flash usually have very limited power and range. So the other advice I can give you (if you often take photos in low light) is to invest in external flashlight.






            share|improve this answer












            For me this is motion blur. And because is the same on all the objects edges it is caused by slow shutter speed. Try to use 1/100, 1/160.



            Also you should know internal flash usually have very limited power and range. So the other advice I can give you (if you often take photos in low light) is to invest in external flashlight.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 58 mins ago









            Romeo Ninov

            2,85521123




            2,85521123







            • 1




              thanks! I thought that was it.
              – bearmohawk
              58 mins ago












            • 1




              thanks! I thought that was it.
              – bearmohawk
              58 mins ago







            1




            1




            thanks! I thought that was it.
            – bearmohawk
            58 mins ago




            thanks! I thought that was it.
            – bearmohawk
            58 mins ago












            up vote
            2
            down vote













            To be a bit more specific, this is the superposition of



            • a very short exposure with flash, the clear sharp part

            • overlaid by an underexposed long exposure shot (the blurry part)

            However, the amount of motion blur for a 1/60 shot is unusually large, so you likely took the picture from far away. This would also explain why the blurred part is so visible, your flash was too far from the subject and didn't make much difference with the ambient light.






            share|improve this answer
























              up vote
              2
              down vote













              To be a bit more specific, this is the superposition of



              • a very short exposure with flash, the clear sharp part

              • overlaid by an underexposed long exposure shot (the blurry part)

              However, the amount of motion blur for a 1/60 shot is unusually large, so you likely took the picture from far away. This would also explain why the blurred part is so visible, your flash was too far from the subject and didn't make much difference with the ambient light.






              share|improve this answer






















                up vote
                2
                down vote










                up vote
                2
                down vote









                To be a bit more specific, this is the superposition of



                • a very short exposure with flash, the clear sharp part

                • overlaid by an underexposed long exposure shot (the blurry part)

                However, the amount of motion blur for a 1/60 shot is unusually large, so you likely took the picture from far away. This would also explain why the blurred part is so visible, your flash was too far from the subject and didn't make much difference with the ambient light.






                share|improve this answer












                To be a bit more specific, this is the superposition of



                • a very short exposure with flash, the clear sharp part

                • overlaid by an underexposed long exposure shot (the blurry part)

                However, the amount of motion blur for a 1/60 shot is unusually large, so you likely took the picture from far away. This would also explain why the blurred part is so visible, your flash was too far from the subject and didn't make much difference with the ambient light.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered 40 mins ago









                xenoid

                1,705311




                1,705311



























                     

                    draft saved


                    draft discarded















































                     


                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphoto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f102155%2fwhat-is-this-effect-and-how-can-i-remove-it%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest
































































                    -

                    Popular posts from this blog

                    How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

                    Image
                    Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 1 down vote favorite I'm using WordPress 4.9.8, CiviCRM to 5.5.1, I usually send email to contact by Search> Find contacts View contact details Action> Send email Send email ok, Contact received mail ok like picture But status only Email sent though contact read email or not. So, can CiviCRM can change status to Email read when contact read email? wordpress email share | improve this question asked Sep 26 at 0:12 ToanLuong 49 9 add a comment  |  up vote 1 down vote favorite I'm using WordPress 4.9.8, CiviCRM to 5.5.1, I usually send email to contact by Search> Find contacts View contact details Action> Send email Send email ok, Contact received mail ok like picture But status only Email sent though contact read email or not. So, can CiviCRM can change status to Email read when contact read email? wordpress email share | improve this questi...
                    Read more

                    Displaying single band from multi-band raster using QGIS

                    Image
                    Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP 1 How can I extract a single band from multi-band raster in QGIS? I have an remote sensed image which has 6 bands (including NDVI band), I want to display each band separately, but have no idea how to do. I have seen some questions similar here but none worked for me. The original image (has 6 bands) is: I want to display the band 6 which should be like this: But I tried gdal_translate, and couldn't get the correct result. What I have got is: qgis raster multi-band share | improve this question edited Mar 5 at 0:53 Summer asked Mar 4 at 6:42 Summer Summer 23 6 Is this any help gis.stackexchange.com/questions/220658/… ? if not gis.stackexchange.com/questions/62133/… might help. – Michael Stimson Mar 4 at 6:46 Thanks for answering but when I used gdal_translate, qgis showed that 'Error 4: Kayena.tif: No such file or directory". Would you know how to fi...
                    Read more

                    How many registers does an x86_64 CPU actually have?

                    Image
                    Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 2 down vote favorite I am currently learning reverse engineering and am studying the flags register. I had in my mind that rflags was just another name for one of the 16 general purpose registers, for example rax or rbx . But it looks like rflags is actually an additional register. So that makes 17 registers in total... how many more could there be? I have spent at least an hour on this and found numerous different answers. The best answer so far is this, which says that there are 40 registers in total. 16 General Purpose Registers 2 Status Registers 6 Code Segment Registers 16 SSE Registers 8 FPU/MMX Registers But if I add that up, I get 48. Could anybody provide an official answer on how many registers an x86_64 CPU has (e.g. an Intel i7). Additionally, I have seen references to 'hardware' and 'architectural' registers. What are those registers and how many are there? register x86-64 share | improve this...
                    Read more