Why don't the fuse connections in programmable ROM cause the whole matrix to be shorted together?

Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
$begingroup$
If the rationale of using diodes in ROM (rather than simple wires) is to prevent the matrix being shorted together, then why does shorting not occur for programmable ROM - which has blowable fuse connections?
Apologies if should not be starting a new thread for this; please note that the question is inspired by an answer here What is the rationale of using diode matrix in ROM , but I don't have sufficient 'rep' to comment my question there.
rom
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If the rationale of using diodes in ROM (rather than simple wires) is to prevent the matrix being shorted together, then why does shorting not occur for programmable ROM - which has blowable fuse connections?
Apologies if should not be starting a new thread for this; please note that the question is inspired by an answer here What is the rationale of using diode matrix in ROM , but I don't have sufficient 'rep' to comment my question there.
rom
$endgroup$
4
$begingroup$
Asking a new question and cross-referencing to the old one is the correct procedure on this site. +1.
$endgroup$
– Transistor
Feb 19 at 7:13
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If the rationale of using diodes in ROM (rather than simple wires) is to prevent the matrix being shorted together, then why does shorting not occur for programmable ROM - which has blowable fuse connections?
Apologies if should not be starting a new thread for this; please note that the question is inspired by an answer here What is the rationale of using diode matrix in ROM , but I don't have sufficient 'rep' to comment my question there.
rom
$endgroup$
If the rationale of using diodes in ROM (rather than simple wires) is to prevent the matrix being shorted together, then why does shorting not occur for programmable ROM - which has blowable fuse connections?
Apologies if should not be starting a new thread for this; please note that the question is inspired by an answer here What is the rationale of using diode matrix in ROM , but I don't have sufficient 'rep' to comment my question there.
rom
rom
asked Feb 19 at 6:45
dmacdmac
687
687
4
$begingroup$
Asking a new question and cross-referencing to the old one is the correct procedure on this site. +1.
$endgroup$
– Transistor
Feb 19 at 7:13
add a comment |
4
$begingroup$
Asking a new question and cross-referencing to the old one is the correct procedure on this site. +1.
$endgroup$
– Transistor
Feb 19 at 7:13
4
4
$begingroup$
Asking a new question and cross-referencing to the old one is the correct procedure on this site. +1.
$endgroup$
– Transistor
Feb 19 at 7:13
$begingroup$
Asking a new question and cross-referencing to the old one is the correct procedure on this site. +1.
$endgroup$
– Transistor
Feb 19 at 7:13
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Fuse-programmable ROM is not a simple wired XY matrix, with fuses at each intersection. That wouldn't work, for the reasons you give.
Typically, transistors are used at each intersection, like this.

Image from here, worth visiting if you're interested in other types of ROM.
Conceptually, something as simple as a diode in series with each fuse would serve to both allow reading, and selection of the appropriate fuse to blow. However, there's a lot of development and technology between the basic idea, and a commercial product. Interestingly, many fuse ROMS use 'anti-fuses'. In the right process, high voltage can punch through the dielectric layer of a capacitor and make it fail short more reliably and cheaply than high current can open a fuse.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("schematics", function ()
StackExchange.schematics.init();
);
, "cicuitlab");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "135"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f423131%2fwhy-dont-the-fuse-connections-in-programmable-rom-cause-the-whole-matrix-to-be%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Fuse-programmable ROM is not a simple wired XY matrix, with fuses at each intersection. That wouldn't work, for the reasons you give.
Typically, transistors are used at each intersection, like this.

Image from here, worth visiting if you're interested in other types of ROM.
Conceptually, something as simple as a diode in series with each fuse would serve to both allow reading, and selection of the appropriate fuse to blow. However, there's a lot of development and technology between the basic idea, and a commercial product. Interestingly, many fuse ROMS use 'anti-fuses'. In the right process, high voltage can punch through the dielectric layer of a capacitor and make it fail short more reliably and cheaply than high current can open a fuse.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Fuse-programmable ROM is not a simple wired XY matrix, with fuses at each intersection. That wouldn't work, for the reasons you give.
Typically, transistors are used at each intersection, like this.

Image from here, worth visiting if you're interested in other types of ROM.
Conceptually, something as simple as a diode in series with each fuse would serve to both allow reading, and selection of the appropriate fuse to blow. However, there's a lot of development and technology between the basic idea, and a commercial product. Interestingly, many fuse ROMS use 'anti-fuses'. In the right process, high voltage can punch through the dielectric layer of a capacitor and make it fail short more reliably and cheaply than high current can open a fuse.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Fuse-programmable ROM is not a simple wired XY matrix, with fuses at each intersection. That wouldn't work, for the reasons you give.
Typically, transistors are used at each intersection, like this.

Image from here, worth visiting if you're interested in other types of ROM.
Conceptually, something as simple as a diode in series with each fuse would serve to both allow reading, and selection of the appropriate fuse to blow. However, there's a lot of development and technology between the basic idea, and a commercial product. Interestingly, many fuse ROMS use 'anti-fuses'. In the right process, high voltage can punch through the dielectric layer of a capacitor and make it fail short more reliably and cheaply than high current can open a fuse.
$endgroup$
Fuse-programmable ROM is not a simple wired XY matrix, with fuses at each intersection. That wouldn't work, for the reasons you give.
Typically, transistors are used at each intersection, like this.

Image from here, worth visiting if you're interested in other types of ROM.
Conceptually, something as simple as a diode in series with each fuse would serve to both allow reading, and selection of the appropriate fuse to blow. However, there's a lot of development and technology between the basic idea, and a commercial product. Interestingly, many fuse ROMS use 'anti-fuses'. In the right process, high voltage can punch through the dielectric layer of a capacitor and make it fail short more reliably and cheaply than high current can open a fuse.
edited Feb 19 at 16:07
answered Feb 19 at 8:52
Neil_UKNeil_UK
77.6k284177
77.6k284177
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Electrical Engineering Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f423131%2fwhy-dont-the-fuse-connections-in-programmable-rom-cause-the-whole-matrix-to-be%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
4
$begingroup$
Asking a new question and cross-referencing to the old one is the correct procedure on this site. +1.
$endgroup$
– Transistor
Feb 19 at 7:13