Centering, linebreaks and raggedright in underbrace text in mathmode

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP












4















I want the text under an underbrace in mathmode to
1. Have linebreaks.
2. Be raggedright
3. Remain centered with respect to the midpoint of the underbrace.



I have tried with the two methods in the following code, but without success:



documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
newcommandsometextGiven the conditions we impose

begindocument
With textbackslash mbox:
beginequationnonumber
x
underbrace=_%
mbox%
parbox[c]2cm%
raggedright
scriptsize
sometext



y
endequation
With amsmath textbackslash text:
beginequationnonumber
x
underbrace=_%
text%
parbox[c]2cm%
raggedright
sometext



y
endequation
enddocument


enter image description here










share|improve this question



















  • 1





    In order for the parbox to know how to break lines, a width is necessary. Therefore, the moment you set it to 2cm, the boxes' width becomes that and the whole box (white space included) is centered with respect to the underbrace (change mbox for fbox to see the idea). You can avoid this in two ways. 1. Avoid the parbox and break lines on your own, like suggested below. 2. Choose and appropiate size for each case. 1.28cm or 1.66cm seem to give a nicer picture.

    – mendus
    Feb 19 at 12:34












  • Ok. I see. Could the margins of the mbox and fbox be set to zero, or at least to be symmetric to the left and right?

    – Rasmus
    Feb 19 at 15:02












  • As @mendus (and, implictly, Steven, in his answer) has already remarked, the problem is (almost) trivial if you accept the condition that all line breaks be specified manually; it becomes significantly tougher if you insist on automatic line-breaking. Before posting a long and complicated answer, I’d like to know if the requirement that line breaks are automatically found by TeX is really an esential part of your question.

    – GuM
    Feb 19 at 15:48











  • I'm not gonna use this extensively, so I can define the line breaks manually. I find it unsatisfying, though, that it seems complicated to get this done automatically :-)

    – Rasmus
    Feb 19 at 17:25











  • @Rasmus As far as I understand, the white space are not margins. If you want it ragged right, the space will be on the right. If you want to automate it, I would suggest centering the text and removing the width of the box with makebox[0pt]<center aligned parbox>

    – mendus
    Feb 20 at 8:22
















4















I want the text under an underbrace in mathmode to
1. Have linebreaks.
2. Be raggedright
3. Remain centered with respect to the midpoint of the underbrace.



I have tried with the two methods in the following code, but without success:



documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
newcommandsometextGiven the conditions we impose

begindocument
With textbackslash mbox:
beginequationnonumber
x
underbrace=_%
mbox%
parbox[c]2cm%
raggedright
scriptsize
sometext



y
endequation
With amsmath textbackslash text:
beginequationnonumber
x
underbrace=_%
text%
parbox[c]2cm%
raggedright
sometext



y
endequation
enddocument


enter image description here










share|improve this question



















  • 1





    In order for the parbox to know how to break lines, a width is necessary. Therefore, the moment you set it to 2cm, the boxes' width becomes that and the whole box (white space included) is centered with respect to the underbrace (change mbox for fbox to see the idea). You can avoid this in two ways. 1. Avoid the parbox and break lines on your own, like suggested below. 2. Choose and appropiate size for each case. 1.28cm or 1.66cm seem to give a nicer picture.

    – mendus
    Feb 19 at 12:34












  • Ok. I see. Could the margins of the mbox and fbox be set to zero, or at least to be symmetric to the left and right?

    – Rasmus
    Feb 19 at 15:02












  • As @mendus (and, implictly, Steven, in his answer) has already remarked, the problem is (almost) trivial if you accept the condition that all line breaks be specified manually; it becomes significantly tougher if you insist on automatic line-breaking. Before posting a long and complicated answer, I’d like to know if the requirement that line breaks are automatically found by TeX is really an esential part of your question.

    – GuM
    Feb 19 at 15:48











  • I'm not gonna use this extensively, so I can define the line breaks manually. I find it unsatisfying, though, that it seems complicated to get this done automatically :-)

    – Rasmus
    Feb 19 at 17:25











  • @Rasmus As far as I understand, the white space are not margins. If you want it ragged right, the space will be on the right. If you want to automate it, I would suggest centering the text and removing the width of the box with makebox[0pt]<center aligned parbox>

    – mendus
    Feb 20 at 8:22














4












4








4








I want the text under an underbrace in mathmode to
1. Have linebreaks.
2. Be raggedright
3. Remain centered with respect to the midpoint of the underbrace.



I have tried with the two methods in the following code, but without success:



documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
newcommandsometextGiven the conditions we impose

begindocument
With textbackslash mbox:
beginequationnonumber
x
underbrace=_%
mbox%
parbox[c]2cm%
raggedright
scriptsize
sometext



y
endequation
With amsmath textbackslash text:
beginequationnonumber
x
underbrace=_%
text%
parbox[c]2cm%
raggedright
sometext



y
endequation
enddocument


enter image description here










share|improve this question
















I want the text under an underbrace in mathmode to
1. Have linebreaks.
2. Be raggedright
3. Remain centered with respect to the midpoint of the underbrace.



I have tried with the two methods in the following code, but without success:



documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
newcommandsometextGiven the conditions we impose

begindocument
With textbackslash mbox:
beginequationnonumber
x
underbrace=_%
mbox%
parbox[c]2cm%
raggedright
scriptsize
sometext



y
endequation
With amsmath textbackslash text:
beginequationnonumber
x
underbrace=_%
text%
parbox[c]2cm%
raggedright
sometext



y
endequation
enddocument


enter image description here







horizontal-alignment underbrace






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Feb 19 at 12:17









Steven B. Segletes

158k9204411




158k9204411










asked Feb 19 at 12:05









RasmusRasmus

715




715







  • 1





    In order for the parbox to know how to break lines, a width is necessary. Therefore, the moment you set it to 2cm, the boxes' width becomes that and the whole box (white space included) is centered with respect to the underbrace (change mbox for fbox to see the idea). You can avoid this in two ways. 1. Avoid the parbox and break lines on your own, like suggested below. 2. Choose and appropiate size for each case. 1.28cm or 1.66cm seem to give a nicer picture.

    – mendus
    Feb 19 at 12:34












  • Ok. I see. Could the margins of the mbox and fbox be set to zero, or at least to be symmetric to the left and right?

    – Rasmus
    Feb 19 at 15:02












  • As @mendus (and, implictly, Steven, in his answer) has already remarked, the problem is (almost) trivial if you accept the condition that all line breaks be specified manually; it becomes significantly tougher if you insist on automatic line-breaking. Before posting a long and complicated answer, I’d like to know if the requirement that line breaks are automatically found by TeX is really an esential part of your question.

    – GuM
    Feb 19 at 15:48











  • I'm not gonna use this extensively, so I can define the line breaks manually. I find it unsatisfying, though, that it seems complicated to get this done automatically :-)

    – Rasmus
    Feb 19 at 17:25











  • @Rasmus As far as I understand, the white space are not margins. If you want it ragged right, the space will be on the right. If you want to automate it, I would suggest centering the text and removing the width of the box with makebox[0pt]<center aligned parbox>

    – mendus
    Feb 20 at 8:22













  • 1





    In order for the parbox to know how to break lines, a width is necessary. Therefore, the moment you set it to 2cm, the boxes' width becomes that and the whole box (white space included) is centered with respect to the underbrace (change mbox for fbox to see the idea). You can avoid this in two ways. 1. Avoid the parbox and break lines on your own, like suggested below. 2. Choose and appropiate size for each case. 1.28cm or 1.66cm seem to give a nicer picture.

    – mendus
    Feb 19 at 12:34












  • Ok. I see. Could the margins of the mbox and fbox be set to zero, or at least to be symmetric to the left and right?

    – Rasmus
    Feb 19 at 15:02












  • As @mendus (and, implictly, Steven, in his answer) has already remarked, the problem is (almost) trivial if you accept the condition that all line breaks be specified manually; it becomes significantly tougher if you insist on automatic line-breaking. Before posting a long and complicated answer, I’d like to know if the requirement that line breaks are automatically found by TeX is really an esential part of your question.

    – GuM
    Feb 19 at 15:48











  • I'm not gonna use this extensively, so I can define the line breaks manually. I find it unsatisfying, though, that it seems complicated to get this done automatically :-)

    – Rasmus
    Feb 19 at 17:25











  • @Rasmus As far as I understand, the white space are not margins. If you want it ragged right, the space will be on the right. If you want to automate it, I would suggest centering the text and removing the width of the box with makebox[0pt]<center aligned parbox>

    – mendus
    Feb 20 at 8:22








1




1





In order for the parbox to know how to break lines, a width is necessary. Therefore, the moment you set it to 2cm, the boxes' width becomes that and the whole box (white space included) is centered with respect to the underbrace (change mbox for fbox to see the idea). You can avoid this in two ways. 1. Avoid the parbox and break lines on your own, like suggested below. 2. Choose and appropiate size for each case. 1.28cm or 1.66cm seem to give a nicer picture.

– mendus
Feb 19 at 12:34






In order for the parbox to know how to break lines, a width is necessary. Therefore, the moment you set it to 2cm, the boxes' width becomes that and the whole box (white space included) is centered with respect to the underbrace (change mbox for fbox to see the idea). You can avoid this in two ways. 1. Avoid the parbox and break lines on your own, like suggested below. 2. Choose and appropiate size for each case. 1.28cm or 1.66cm seem to give a nicer picture.

– mendus
Feb 19 at 12:34














Ok. I see. Could the margins of the mbox and fbox be set to zero, or at least to be symmetric to the left and right?

– Rasmus
Feb 19 at 15:02






Ok. I see. Could the margins of the mbox and fbox be set to zero, or at least to be symmetric to the left and right?

– Rasmus
Feb 19 at 15:02














As @mendus (and, implictly, Steven, in his answer) has already remarked, the problem is (almost) trivial if you accept the condition that all line breaks be specified manually; it becomes significantly tougher if you insist on automatic line-breaking. Before posting a long and complicated answer, I’d like to know if the requirement that line breaks are automatically found by TeX is really an esential part of your question.

– GuM
Feb 19 at 15:48





As @mendus (and, implictly, Steven, in his answer) has already remarked, the problem is (almost) trivial if you accept the condition that all line breaks be specified manually; it becomes significantly tougher if you insist on automatic line-breaking. Before posting a long and complicated answer, I’d like to know if the requirement that line breaks are automatically found by TeX is really an esential part of your question.

– GuM
Feb 19 at 15:48













I'm not gonna use this extensively, so I can define the line breaks manually. I find it unsatisfying, though, that it seems complicated to get this done automatically :-)

– Rasmus
Feb 19 at 17:25





I'm not gonna use this extensively, so I can define the line breaks manually. I find it unsatisfying, though, that it seems complicated to get this done automatically :-)

– Rasmus
Feb 19 at 17:25













@Rasmus As far as I understand, the white space are not margins. If you want it ragged right, the space will be on the right. If you want to automate it, I would suggest centering the text and removing the width of the box with makebox[0pt]<center aligned parbox>

– mendus
Feb 20 at 8:22






@Rasmus As far as I understand, the white space are not margins. If you want it ragged right, the space will be on the right. If you want to automate it, I would suggest centering the text and removing the width of the box with makebox[0pt]<center aligned parbox>

– mendus
Feb 20 at 8:22











2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















5














For a column this narrow, I think manual linebreaks work better. Then you don't have to specify an arbitrary column width (such as 2cm). In addition, using a makebox[0pt] box allows for the underset text to not disturb the equation spacing (though the underbrace itself does a bit)



documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath,stackengine
setstackEOL\
newcommandsometextGiven the conditions we impose
begindocument
[
x underbrace=_%
makebox[0pt]tinyLongunderstack[l]Given the\conditions\we impose
y
]
enddocument


enter image description here



With a little more work, you could restore the natural math spacing of the = sign, though perhaps this is not important.



documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath,stackengine
setstackEOL\
newcommandundertext[3][3pt]%
mathrelstackengine#1$#2$$underbrace_%
makebox[0pt]tinyLongunderstack[l]#3$UcFTL%

begindocument
[
x undertext=Given the\conditions\we impose y
]
enddocument


enter image description here






share|improve this answer
































    3














    An approximative and rudimental solution. but it works. It is possible to fit the space between x and y fixing hspace-.5cm.



    enter image description here



    documentclassarticle
    usepackageamsmath
    begindocument
    [
    xhspace-.5cmunderbrace=_mboxtinybegintabularcc Given the\conditions\we imposeendtabularhspace-.45cmy
    ]
    enddocument





    share|improve this answer
























      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "85"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f475646%2fcentering-linebreaks-and-raggedright-in-underbrace-text-in-mathmode%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      5














      For a column this narrow, I think manual linebreaks work better. Then you don't have to specify an arbitrary column width (such as 2cm). In addition, using a makebox[0pt] box allows for the underset text to not disturb the equation spacing (though the underbrace itself does a bit)



      documentclassarticle
      usepackageamsmath,stackengine
      setstackEOL\
      newcommandsometextGiven the conditions we impose
      begindocument
      [
      x underbrace=_%
      makebox[0pt]tinyLongunderstack[l]Given the\conditions\we impose
      y
      ]
      enddocument


      enter image description here



      With a little more work, you could restore the natural math spacing of the = sign, though perhaps this is not important.



      documentclassarticle
      usepackageamsmath,stackengine
      setstackEOL\
      newcommandundertext[3][3pt]%
      mathrelstackengine#1$#2$$underbrace_%
      makebox[0pt]tinyLongunderstack[l]#3$UcFTL%

      begindocument
      [
      x undertext=Given the\conditions\we impose y
      ]
      enddocument


      enter image description here






      share|improve this answer





























        5














        For a column this narrow, I think manual linebreaks work better. Then you don't have to specify an arbitrary column width (such as 2cm). In addition, using a makebox[0pt] box allows for the underset text to not disturb the equation spacing (though the underbrace itself does a bit)



        documentclassarticle
        usepackageamsmath,stackengine
        setstackEOL\
        newcommandsometextGiven the conditions we impose
        begindocument
        [
        x underbrace=_%
        makebox[0pt]tinyLongunderstack[l]Given the\conditions\we impose
        y
        ]
        enddocument


        enter image description here



        With a little more work, you could restore the natural math spacing of the = sign, though perhaps this is not important.



        documentclassarticle
        usepackageamsmath,stackengine
        setstackEOL\
        newcommandundertext[3][3pt]%
        mathrelstackengine#1$#2$$underbrace_%
        makebox[0pt]tinyLongunderstack[l]#3$UcFTL%

        begindocument
        [
        x undertext=Given the\conditions\we impose y
        ]
        enddocument


        enter image description here






        share|improve this answer



























          5












          5








          5







          For a column this narrow, I think manual linebreaks work better. Then you don't have to specify an arbitrary column width (such as 2cm). In addition, using a makebox[0pt] box allows for the underset text to not disturb the equation spacing (though the underbrace itself does a bit)



          documentclassarticle
          usepackageamsmath,stackengine
          setstackEOL\
          newcommandsometextGiven the conditions we impose
          begindocument
          [
          x underbrace=_%
          makebox[0pt]tinyLongunderstack[l]Given the\conditions\we impose
          y
          ]
          enddocument


          enter image description here



          With a little more work, you could restore the natural math spacing of the = sign, though perhaps this is not important.



          documentclassarticle
          usepackageamsmath,stackengine
          setstackEOL\
          newcommandundertext[3][3pt]%
          mathrelstackengine#1$#2$$underbrace_%
          makebox[0pt]tinyLongunderstack[l]#3$UcFTL%

          begindocument
          [
          x undertext=Given the\conditions\we impose y
          ]
          enddocument


          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer















          For a column this narrow, I think manual linebreaks work better. Then you don't have to specify an arbitrary column width (such as 2cm). In addition, using a makebox[0pt] box allows for the underset text to not disturb the equation spacing (though the underbrace itself does a bit)



          documentclassarticle
          usepackageamsmath,stackengine
          setstackEOL\
          newcommandsometextGiven the conditions we impose
          begindocument
          [
          x underbrace=_%
          makebox[0pt]tinyLongunderstack[l]Given the\conditions\we impose
          y
          ]
          enddocument


          enter image description here



          With a little more work, you could restore the natural math spacing of the = sign, though perhaps this is not important.



          documentclassarticle
          usepackageamsmath,stackengine
          setstackEOL\
          newcommandundertext[3][3pt]%
          mathrelstackengine#1$#2$$underbrace_%
          makebox[0pt]tinyLongunderstack[l]#3$UcFTL%

          begindocument
          [
          x undertext=Given the\conditions\we impose y
          ]
          enddocument


          enter image description here







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Feb 19 at 12:59

























          answered Feb 19 at 12:14









          Steven B. SegletesSteven B. Segletes

          158k9204411




          158k9204411





















              3














              An approximative and rudimental solution. but it works. It is possible to fit the space between x and y fixing hspace-.5cm.



              enter image description here



              documentclassarticle
              usepackageamsmath
              begindocument
              [
              xhspace-.5cmunderbrace=_mboxtinybegintabularcc Given the\conditions\we imposeendtabularhspace-.45cmy
              ]
              enddocument





              share|improve this answer





























                3














                An approximative and rudimental solution. but it works. It is possible to fit the space between x and y fixing hspace-.5cm.



                enter image description here



                documentclassarticle
                usepackageamsmath
                begindocument
                [
                xhspace-.5cmunderbrace=_mboxtinybegintabularcc Given the\conditions\we imposeendtabularhspace-.45cmy
                ]
                enddocument





                share|improve this answer



























                  3












                  3








                  3







                  An approximative and rudimental solution. but it works. It is possible to fit the space between x and y fixing hspace-.5cm.



                  enter image description here



                  documentclassarticle
                  usepackageamsmath
                  begindocument
                  [
                  xhspace-.5cmunderbrace=_mboxtinybegintabularcc Given the\conditions\we imposeendtabularhspace-.45cmy
                  ]
                  enddocument





                  share|improve this answer















                  An approximative and rudimental solution. but it works. It is possible to fit the space between x and y fixing hspace-.5cm.



                  enter image description here



                  documentclassarticle
                  usepackageamsmath
                  begindocument
                  [
                  xhspace-.5cmunderbrace=_mboxtinybegintabularcc Given the\conditions\we imposeendtabularhspace-.45cmy
                  ]
                  enddocument






                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited Feb 19 at 16:21

























                  answered Feb 19 at 13:41









                  SebastianoSebastiano

                  11k42163




                  11k42163



























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded
















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f475646%2fcentering-linebreaks-and-raggedright-in-underbrace-text-in-mathmode%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown






                      Popular posts from this blog

                      How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

                      Bahrain

                      Postfix configuration issue with fips on centos 7; mailgun relay