Is it possible that a question has only two answers?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
□ yes □ no
"no" implies that a closed system with only two options like the one above is impossible. If you accept that such a system is possible by the way, it generates paradoxical results, since if the answer is "no" it's possible that a question has only two answers.
"yes" implies that in a two-option system like the one above I can't give another answer, like: to leave the boxes blank, to fill both, to jump to my feet, etc.
Edit after getting the answer: My question plays with the ambiguity of ‘question’. If the rule is that you have to choose just two option, the answer is yes. I’m interested about the possibility to change/reinterpret the rules with a reaction that I state as an answer, an option that is always possibile for every answer. But it’s another problem: When a reaction out of the rules becomes an answer? Can an answer change the rules of a question?
logic philosophy-of-language paradox
asked Mar 10 at 15:30
Francesco D'IsaFrancesco D'Isa
695214
|
show 4 more comments
□ yes □ no
"no" implies that a closed system with only two options like the one above is impossible. If you accept that such a system is possible by the way, it generates paradoxical results, since if the answer is "no" it's possible that a question has only two answers.
"yes" implies that in a two-option system like the one above I can't give another answer, like: to leave the boxes blank, to fill both, to jump to my feet, etc.
Edit after getting the answer: My question plays with the ambiguity of ‘question’. If the rule is that you have to choose just two option, the answer is yes. I’m interested about the possibility to change/reinterpret the rules with a reaction that I state as an answer, an option that is always possibile for every answer. But it’s another problem: When a reaction out of the rules becomes an answer? Can an answer change the rules of a question?
logic philosophy-of-language paradox
asked Mar 10 at 15:30
Francesco D'IsaFrancesco D'Isa
695214
3
Sorry but I don't see the paradox.
– William Cullerne Bown
Mar 10 at 15:41
Why does ‘yes’ lead to a paradoxical result?
– Eliran
Mar 10 at 15:46
1
It seems to me that very few questions may be answered so simply by either yes or no.
– Bread
Mar 10 at 16:18
1
@Eliran. I had not read your comments when I wrote my answer. I agree with them entirely. The coincidence of language is just that, a coincidence of two people thinking alike. I have made mention of you in my (revised) answer, which should direct readers to your other comments. It was a slip on my part not to read the comments before writing. Apologies - Geoffrey
– Geoffrey Thomas♦
Mar 10 at 19:00
1
@Eliran I thought about it and I agree with you, my question plays with the ambiguity of ‘question’. If the rule is that you have to choose just two option, the answer is yes. I’m interested about the possibility to change/reinterpret the rules with a reaction that I state as an answer, an option that is always possibile for every answer. But it’s another problem.
– Francesco D'Isa
Mar 10 at 19:47
|
show 4 more comments
□ yes □ no
"no" implies that a closed system with only two options like the one above is impossible. If you accept that such a system is possible by the way, it generates paradoxical results, since if the answer is "no" it's possible that a question has only two answers.
"yes" implies that in a two-option system like the one above I can't give another answer, like: to leave the boxes blank, to fill both, to jump to my feet, etc.
Edit after getting the answer: My question plays with the ambiguity of ‘question’. If the rule is that you have to choose just two option, the answer is yes. I’m interested about the possibility to change/reinterpret the rules with a reaction that I state as an answer, an option that is always possibile for every answer. But it’s another problem: When a reaction out of the rules becomes an answer? Can an answer change the rules of a question?
logic philosophy-of-language paradox
asked Mar 10 at 15:30
Francesco D'IsaFrancesco D'Isa
695214
□ yes □ no
"no" implies that a closed system with only two options like the one above is impossible. If you accept that such a system is possible by the way, it generates paradoxical results, since if the answer is "no" it's possible that a question has only two answers.
"yes" implies that in a two-option system like the one above I can't give another answer, like: to leave the boxes blank, to fill both, to jump to my feet, etc.
Edit after getting the answer: My question plays with the ambiguity of ‘question’. If the rule is that you have to choose just two option, the answer is yes. I’m interested about the possibility to change/reinterpret the rules with a reaction that I state as an answer, an option that is always possibile for every answer. But it’s another problem: When a reaction out of the rules becomes an answer? Can an answer change the rules of a question?
logic philosophy-of-language paradox
logic philosophy-of-language paradox
asked Mar 10 at 15:30
Francesco D'IsaFrancesco D'Isa
695214
asked Mar 10 at 15:30
Francesco D'IsaFrancesco D'Isa
695214
edited Mar 11 at 9:23
Francesco D'Isa
asked Mar 10 at 15:30
Francesco D'IsaFrancesco D'Isa
695214
asked Mar 10 at 15:30
Francesco D'IsaFrancesco D'Isa
695214
asked Mar 10 at 15:30
Francesco D'IsaFrancesco D'Isa
695214
695214
3
Sorry but I don't see the paradox.
– William Cullerne Bown
Mar 10 at 15:41
Why does ‘yes’ lead to a paradoxical result?
– Eliran
Mar 10 at 15:46
1
It seems to me that very few questions may be answered so simply by either yes or no.
– Bread
Mar 10 at 16:18
1
@Eliran. I had not read your comments when I wrote my answer. I agree with them entirely. The coincidence of language is just that, a coincidence of two people thinking alike. I have made mention of you in my (revised) answer, which should direct readers to your other comments. It was a slip on my part not to read the comments before writing. Apologies - Geoffrey
– Geoffrey Thomas♦
Mar 10 at 19:00
1
@Eliran I thought about it and I agree with you, my question plays with the ambiguity of ‘question’. If the rule is that you have to choose just two option, the answer is yes. I’m interested about the possibility to change/reinterpret the rules with a reaction that I state as an answer, an option that is always possibile for every answer. But it’s another problem.
– Francesco D'Isa
Mar 10 at 19:47
|
show 4 more comments
3
Sorry but I don't see the paradox.
– William Cullerne Bown
Mar 10 at 15:41
Why does ‘yes’ lead to a paradoxical result?
– Eliran
Mar 10 at 15:46
1
It seems to me that very few questions may be answered so simply by either yes or no.
– Bread
Mar 10 at 16:18
1
@Eliran. I had not read your comments when I wrote my answer. I agree with them entirely. The coincidence of language is just that, a coincidence of two people thinking alike. I have made mention of you in my (revised) answer, which should direct readers to your other comments. It was a slip on my part not to read the comments before writing. Apologies - Geoffrey
– Geoffrey Thomas♦
Mar 10 at 19:00
1
@Eliran I thought about it and I agree with you, my question plays with the ambiguity of ‘question’. If the rule is that you have to choose just two option, the answer is yes. I’m interested about the possibility to change/reinterpret the rules with a reaction that I state as an answer, an option that is always possibile for every answer. But it’s another problem.
– Francesco D'Isa
Mar 10 at 19:47
3
3
Sorry but I don't see the paradox.
– William Cullerne Bown
Mar 10 at 15:41
Sorry but I don't see the paradox.
– William Cullerne Bown
Mar 10 at 15:41
Why does ‘yes’ lead to a paradoxical result?
– Eliran
Mar 10 at 15:46
Why does ‘yes’ lead to a paradoxical result?
– Eliran
Mar 10 at 15:46
1
1
It seems to me that very few questions may be answered so simply by either yes or no.
– Bread
Mar 10 at 16:18
It seems to me that very few questions may be answered so simply by either yes or no.
– Bread
Mar 10 at 16:18
1
1
@Eliran. I had not read your comments when I wrote my answer. I agree with them entirely. The coincidence of language is just that, a coincidence of two people thinking alike. I have made mention of you in my (revised) answer, which should direct readers to your other comments. It was a slip on my part not to read the comments before writing. Apologies - Geoffrey
– Geoffrey Thomas♦
Mar 10 at 19:00
@Eliran. I had not read your comments when I wrote my answer. I agree with them entirely. The coincidence of language is just that, a coincidence of two people thinking alike. I have made mention of you in my (revised) answer, which should direct readers to your other comments. It was a slip on my part not to read the comments before writing. Apologies - Geoffrey
– Geoffrey Thomas♦
Mar 10 at 19:00
1
1
@Eliran I thought about it and I agree with you, my question plays with the ambiguity of ‘question’. If the rule is that you have to choose just two option, the answer is yes. I’m interested about the possibility to change/reinterpret the rules with a reaction that I state as an answer, an option that is always possibile for every answer. But it’s another problem.
– Francesco D'Isa
Mar 10 at 19:47
@Eliran I thought about it and I agree with you, my question plays with the ambiguity of ‘question’. If the rule is that you have to choose just two option, the answer is yes. I’m interested about the possibility to change/reinterpret the rules with a reaction that I state as an answer, an option that is always possibile for every answer. But it’s another problem.
– Francesco D'Isa
Mar 10 at 19:47
|
show 4 more comments
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Answer 1 - 'yes'
Suppose I ask, 'Can Tom walk ?' I am asking about the truth-value of the proposition, 'Tom can walk'. I expect the answer 'Yes' or 'No'. The answer, 'Yes', is right if Tom can walk and wrong if he can't - in which case the right answer is 'No'.
There are, of course, since we are using a natural language, indefinitely many possibilities for the actual meaning of 'Tom can walk' but this is not a wrecking problem. There is no reason in principle why we should not be able to agree on the contextual meaning of 'Tom can walk'.
Right, so I am saying 'yes', a question, this question, has only two answers. And (to work back to the terms of your heading) if the question actually only has two answers then it follows that it is possible that it has only two answers : actuality implies possibility.
You object :
"yes" implies that in a two-option system like the one above I can't give another answer, like: to leave the boxes blank, to fill both, to jump to my feet, etc.
But leaving the boxes blank, filling in both, jumping you your feet, are not answers - they are merely behavioural responses. If I ask whether you would like a cup of coffee, yes or no ?, and you throw the cup in my face, this would be an interesting response but not (without a lot of scene-setting, to which you do not appeal) an answer.
You reply to Eliran :
There's no written rule, moreover the rules could change or be differently interpreted. I understand what you mean, but what differentiates a reaction from an answer?
But you gave no indication at the start that while you were using 'question' in a standard way, no such restraint applied to your use of 'answer'. If the point of a question is to determine whether a certain proposition is true or false, your various behavioural responses - 'reactions' - determine no such thing and leave me none the wiser. Giving an answer is, of course, itself a behavioural response but the responses you list are truth-irrelevant.
Answer 2 - 'no'
If I say, 'no, it is not possible that a question has only two answers', but why should I?, what follows ?
it's possible that a question has only two answers.
I can't see how this follows. How can 'It is not possible that a question has only two answers' imply 'It is possible that a question has only two answers'.
A problem is clearly on your mind but I can't see what it is. I may well have misunderstood what's concerning you but in that case my answer may help spotlight the misconception.
answered Mar 10 at 18:44
Geoffrey Thomas♦Geoffrey Thomas
27.2k222105
Thank you for your answer, as I wrote in my comments below I agree with you
– Francesco D'Isa
Mar 10 at 19:48
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "265"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphilosophy.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f61036%2fis-it-possible-that-a-question-has-only-two-answers%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Answer 1 - 'yes'
Suppose I ask, 'Can Tom walk ?' I am asking about the truth-value of the proposition, 'Tom can walk'. I expect the answer 'Yes' or 'No'. The answer, 'Yes', is right if Tom can walk and wrong if he can't - in which case the right answer is 'No'.
There are, of course, since we are using a natural language, indefinitely many possibilities for the actual meaning of 'Tom can walk' but this is not a wrecking problem. There is no reason in principle why we should not be able to agree on the contextual meaning of 'Tom can walk'.
Right, so I am saying 'yes', a question, this question, has only two answers. And (to work back to the terms of your heading) if the question actually only has two answers then it follows that it is possible that it has only two answers : actuality implies possibility.
You object :
"yes" implies that in a two-option system like the one above I can't give another answer, like: to leave the boxes blank, to fill both, to jump to my feet, etc.
But leaving the boxes blank, filling in both, jumping you your feet, are not answers - they are merely behavioural responses. If I ask whether you would like a cup of coffee, yes or no ?, and you throw the cup in my face, this would be an interesting response but not (without a lot of scene-setting, to which you do not appeal) an answer.
You reply to Eliran :
There's no written rule, moreover the rules could change or be differently interpreted. I understand what you mean, but what differentiates a reaction from an answer?
But you gave no indication at the start that while you were using 'question' in a standard way, no such restraint applied to your use of 'answer'. If the point of a question is to determine whether a certain proposition is true or false, your various behavioural responses - 'reactions' - determine no such thing and leave me none the wiser. Giving an answer is, of course, itself a behavioural response but the responses you list are truth-irrelevant.
Answer 2 - 'no'
If I say, 'no, it is not possible that a question has only two answers', but why should I?, what follows ?
it's possible that a question has only two answers.
I can't see how this follows. How can 'It is not possible that a question has only two answers' imply 'It is possible that a question has only two answers'.
A problem is clearly on your mind but I can't see what it is. I may well have misunderstood what's concerning you but in that case my answer may help spotlight the misconception.
answered Mar 10 at 18:44
Geoffrey Thomas♦Geoffrey Thomas
27.2k222105
Thank you for your answer, as I wrote in my comments below I agree with you
– Francesco D'Isa
Mar 10 at 19:48
add a comment |
Answer 1 - 'yes'
Suppose I ask, 'Can Tom walk ?' I am asking about the truth-value of the proposition, 'Tom can walk'. I expect the answer 'Yes' or 'No'. The answer, 'Yes', is right if Tom can walk and wrong if he can't - in which case the right answer is 'No'.
There are, of course, since we are using a natural language, indefinitely many possibilities for the actual meaning of 'Tom can walk' but this is not a wrecking problem. There is no reason in principle why we should not be able to agree on the contextual meaning of 'Tom can walk'.
Right, so I am saying 'yes', a question, this question, has only two answers. And (to work back to the terms of your heading) if the question actually only has two answers then it follows that it is possible that it has only two answers : actuality implies possibility.
You object :
"yes" implies that in a two-option system like the one above I can't give another answer, like: to leave the boxes blank, to fill both, to jump to my feet, etc.
But leaving the boxes blank, filling in both, jumping you your feet, are not answers - they are merely behavioural responses. If I ask whether you would like a cup of coffee, yes or no ?, and you throw the cup in my face, this would be an interesting response but not (without a lot of scene-setting, to which you do not appeal) an answer.
You reply to Eliran :
There's no written rule, moreover the rules could change or be differently interpreted. I understand what you mean, but what differentiates a reaction from an answer?
But you gave no indication at the start that while you were using 'question' in a standard way, no such restraint applied to your use of 'answer'. If the point of a question is to determine whether a certain proposition is true or false, your various behavioural responses - 'reactions' - determine no such thing and leave me none the wiser. Giving an answer is, of course, itself a behavioural response but the responses you list are truth-irrelevant.
Answer 2 - 'no'
If I say, 'no, it is not possible that a question has only two answers', but why should I?, what follows ?
it's possible that a question has only two answers.
I can't see how this follows. How can 'It is not possible that a question has only two answers' imply 'It is possible that a question has only two answers'.
A problem is clearly on your mind but I can't see what it is. I may well have misunderstood what's concerning you but in that case my answer may help spotlight the misconception.
answered Mar 10 at 18:44
Geoffrey Thomas♦Geoffrey Thomas
27.2k222105
Thank you for your answer, as I wrote in my comments below I agree with you
– Francesco D'Isa
Mar 10 at 19:48
add a comment |
Answer 1 - 'yes'
Suppose I ask, 'Can Tom walk ?' I am asking about the truth-value of the proposition, 'Tom can walk'. I expect the answer 'Yes' or 'No'. The answer, 'Yes', is right if Tom can walk and wrong if he can't - in which case the right answer is 'No'.
There are, of course, since we are using a natural language, indefinitely many possibilities for the actual meaning of 'Tom can walk' but this is not a wrecking problem. There is no reason in principle why we should not be able to agree on the contextual meaning of 'Tom can walk'.
Right, so I am saying 'yes', a question, this question, has only two answers. And (to work back to the terms of your heading) if the question actually only has two answers then it follows that it is possible that it has only two answers : actuality implies possibility.
You object :
"yes" implies that in a two-option system like the one above I can't give another answer, like: to leave the boxes blank, to fill both, to jump to my feet, etc.
But leaving the boxes blank, filling in both, jumping you your feet, are not answers - they are merely behavioural responses. If I ask whether you would like a cup of coffee, yes or no ?, and you throw the cup in my face, this would be an interesting response but not (without a lot of scene-setting, to which you do not appeal) an answer.
You reply to Eliran :
There's no written rule, moreover the rules could change or be differently interpreted. I understand what you mean, but what differentiates a reaction from an answer?
But you gave no indication at the start that while you were using 'question' in a standard way, no such restraint applied to your use of 'answer'. If the point of a question is to determine whether a certain proposition is true or false, your various behavioural responses - 'reactions' - determine no such thing and leave me none the wiser. Giving an answer is, of course, itself a behavioural response but the responses you list are truth-irrelevant.
Answer 2 - 'no'
If I say, 'no, it is not possible that a question has only two answers', but why should I?, what follows ?
it's possible that a question has only two answers.
I can't see how this follows. How can 'It is not possible that a question has only two answers' imply 'It is possible that a question has only two answers'.
A problem is clearly on your mind but I can't see what it is. I may well have misunderstood what's concerning you but in that case my answer may help spotlight the misconception.
answered Mar 10 at 18:44
Geoffrey Thomas♦Geoffrey Thomas
27.2k222105
Answer 1 - 'yes'
Suppose I ask, 'Can Tom walk ?' I am asking about the truth-value of the proposition, 'Tom can walk'. I expect the answer 'Yes' or 'No'. The answer, 'Yes', is right if Tom can walk and wrong if he can't - in which case the right answer is 'No'.
There are, of course, since we are using a natural language, indefinitely many possibilities for the actual meaning of 'Tom can walk' but this is not a wrecking problem. There is no reason in principle why we should not be able to agree on the contextual meaning of 'Tom can walk'.
Right, so I am saying 'yes', a question, this question, has only two answers. And (to work back to the terms of your heading) if the question actually only has two answers then it follows that it is possible that it has only two answers : actuality implies possibility.
You object :
"yes" implies that in a two-option system like the one above I can't give another answer, like: to leave the boxes blank, to fill both, to jump to my feet, etc.
But leaving the boxes blank, filling in both, jumping you your feet, are not answers - they are merely behavioural responses. If I ask whether you would like a cup of coffee, yes or no ?, and you throw the cup in my face, this would be an interesting response but not (without a lot of scene-setting, to which you do not appeal) an answer.
You reply to Eliran :
There's no written rule, moreover the rules could change or be differently interpreted. I understand what you mean, but what differentiates a reaction from an answer?
But you gave no indication at the start that while you were using 'question' in a standard way, no such restraint applied to your use of 'answer'. If the point of a question is to determine whether a certain proposition is true or false, your various behavioural responses - 'reactions' - determine no such thing and leave me none the wiser. Giving an answer is, of course, itself a behavioural response but the responses you list are truth-irrelevant.
Answer 2 - 'no'
If I say, 'no, it is not possible that a question has only two answers', but why should I?, what follows ?
it's possible that a question has only two answers.
I can't see how this follows. How can 'It is not possible that a question has only two answers' imply 'It is possible that a question has only two answers'.
A problem is clearly on your mind but I can't see what it is. I may well have misunderstood what's concerning you but in that case my answer may help spotlight the misconception.
answered Mar 10 at 18:44
Geoffrey Thomas♦Geoffrey Thomas
27.2k222105
edited Mar 10 at 19:01
answered Mar 10 at 18:44
Geoffrey Thomas♦Geoffrey Thomas
27.2k222105
answered Mar 10 at 18:44
Geoffrey Thomas♦Geoffrey Thomas
27.2k222105
answered Mar 10 at 18:44
Geoffrey Thomas♦Geoffrey Thomas
27.2k222105
27.2k222105
Thank you for your answer, as I wrote in my comments below I agree with you
– Francesco D'Isa
Mar 10 at 19:48
add a comment |
Thank you for your answer, as I wrote in my comments below I agree with you
– Francesco D'Isa
Mar 10 at 19:48
Thank you for your answer, as I wrote in my comments below I agree with you
– Francesco D'Isa
Mar 10 at 19:48
Thank you for your answer, as I wrote in my comments below I agree with you
– Francesco D'Isa
Mar 10 at 19:48
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Philosophy Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphilosophy.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f61036%2fis-it-possible-that-a-question-has-only-two-answers%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
Sorry but I don't see the paradox.
– William Cullerne Bown
Mar 10 at 15:41
Why does ‘yes’ lead to a paradoxical result?
– Eliran
Mar 10 at 15:46
1
It seems to me that very few questions may be answered so simply by either yes or no.
– Bread
Mar 10 at 16:18
1
@Eliran. I had not read your comments when I wrote my answer. I agree with them entirely. The coincidence of language is just that, a coincidence of two people thinking alike. I have made mention of you in my (revised) answer, which should direct readers to your other comments. It was a slip on my part not to read the comments before writing. Apologies - Geoffrey
– Geoffrey Thomas♦
Mar 10 at 19:00
1
@Eliran I thought about it and I agree with you, my question plays with the ambiguity of ‘question’. If the rule is that you have to choose just two option, the answer is yes. I’m interested about the possibility to change/reinterpret the rules with a reaction that I state as an answer, an option that is always possibile for every answer. But it’s another problem.
– Francesco D'Isa
Mar 10 at 19:47