Purpose of this oscillator (74HCT14-based) on RS-232 to RS-485 converter?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
6
down vote

favorite












I am reverse engineering an RS-232 to RS-485 converter to understand how it works. I have attached the schematic that I reverse-engineered from the PCB (apologies for the hand-drawn schematic). I've checked it several times and quite certain that it is correct. The part that confuses me is the oscillator circled in red.



I recognize it as an oscillator based based around C2 & R8, and on my scope I can see it running at about 10kHz. I also see that the five parallel inverters on it's output are acting as some sort of buffer. However, what the heck is it there for?



This converter will work completely powered by RS-232 port, even if just the RX, TX, and ground lines (pins 2, 3, & 5 of the DE9) are connected. It does NOT require the +5~12V line to be connected to an external power supply.



The only theory that I have is that the oscillator is acting as some sort of charge pump to reduce the source impedances of Vcc & -Vcc (which otherwise would be limited by the source impedances of the DE9 pins, plus 4.7k for -Vcc via RN1d), but that's just a guess and I don't really see how/why that would work in practice.



So, any pointers on why that oscillator is there and how it achieves whatever it does would be appreciated!



Edit: thanks for the replies. I've done a bit more digging into RS-232. The idle state of the lines is negative, so connecting the converter will provide the negative rail, and as pointed out, the inverter circuit generates the positive rail from it. What through me off was the +5~12V supply pin on the board; It got me thinking that the positive rail was the one that was initially supplied, which of course is not correct.



[Schematic of the RS232 to RS485 converter. The section circled in red is what I am asking about.










share|improve this question























  • Are you sure that nothing else is connected to the CT3 / D6 node?
    – duskwuff
    Sep 16 at 23:39










  • This circuit is a wee bit confusing. You have 2 sources of Vcc. You have a zener diode type power supply and the 74HCT is also being used to create another Vcc. It would help if all voltage tags had a voltage value so we could see what is going on.
    – Sparky256
    Sep 16 at 23:39






  • 8




    See how the 74HCT14 positive supply (pin 14) is ground, and the negative supply (pin 7) is the negative supply rail? The outlined section is indeed a charge pump which will generate a positive supply rail from just the negative supply. Not being familiar with old school rs232 I'm unsure why exactly this is needed, but I do know that the signalling levels swing to both positive and negative voltages.
    – jms
    Sep 16 at 23:45










  • Nice neat drawing!
    – tariksbl
    Sep 20 at 0:35














up vote
6
down vote

favorite












I am reverse engineering an RS-232 to RS-485 converter to understand how it works. I have attached the schematic that I reverse-engineered from the PCB (apologies for the hand-drawn schematic). I've checked it several times and quite certain that it is correct. The part that confuses me is the oscillator circled in red.



I recognize it as an oscillator based based around C2 & R8, and on my scope I can see it running at about 10kHz. I also see that the five parallel inverters on it's output are acting as some sort of buffer. However, what the heck is it there for?



This converter will work completely powered by RS-232 port, even if just the RX, TX, and ground lines (pins 2, 3, & 5 of the DE9) are connected. It does NOT require the +5~12V line to be connected to an external power supply.



The only theory that I have is that the oscillator is acting as some sort of charge pump to reduce the source impedances of Vcc & -Vcc (which otherwise would be limited by the source impedances of the DE9 pins, plus 4.7k for -Vcc via RN1d), but that's just a guess and I don't really see how/why that would work in practice.



So, any pointers on why that oscillator is there and how it achieves whatever it does would be appreciated!



Edit: thanks for the replies. I've done a bit more digging into RS-232. The idle state of the lines is negative, so connecting the converter will provide the negative rail, and as pointed out, the inverter circuit generates the positive rail from it. What through me off was the +5~12V supply pin on the board; It got me thinking that the positive rail was the one that was initially supplied, which of course is not correct.



[Schematic of the RS232 to RS485 converter. The section circled in red is what I am asking about.










share|improve this question























  • Are you sure that nothing else is connected to the CT3 / D6 node?
    – duskwuff
    Sep 16 at 23:39










  • This circuit is a wee bit confusing. You have 2 sources of Vcc. You have a zener diode type power supply and the 74HCT is also being used to create another Vcc. It would help if all voltage tags had a voltage value so we could see what is going on.
    – Sparky256
    Sep 16 at 23:39






  • 8




    See how the 74HCT14 positive supply (pin 14) is ground, and the negative supply (pin 7) is the negative supply rail? The outlined section is indeed a charge pump which will generate a positive supply rail from just the negative supply. Not being familiar with old school rs232 I'm unsure why exactly this is needed, but I do know that the signalling levels swing to both positive and negative voltages.
    – jms
    Sep 16 at 23:45










  • Nice neat drawing!
    – tariksbl
    Sep 20 at 0:35












up vote
6
down vote

favorite









up vote
6
down vote

favorite











I am reverse engineering an RS-232 to RS-485 converter to understand how it works. I have attached the schematic that I reverse-engineered from the PCB (apologies for the hand-drawn schematic). I've checked it several times and quite certain that it is correct. The part that confuses me is the oscillator circled in red.



I recognize it as an oscillator based based around C2 & R8, and on my scope I can see it running at about 10kHz. I also see that the five parallel inverters on it's output are acting as some sort of buffer. However, what the heck is it there for?



This converter will work completely powered by RS-232 port, even if just the RX, TX, and ground lines (pins 2, 3, & 5 of the DE9) are connected. It does NOT require the +5~12V line to be connected to an external power supply.



The only theory that I have is that the oscillator is acting as some sort of charge pump to reduce the source impedances of Vcc & -Vcc (which otherwise would be limited by the source impedances of the DE9 pins, plus 4.7k for -Vcc via RN1d), but that's just a guess and I don't really see how/why that would work in practice.



So, any pointers on why that oscillator is there and how it achieves whatever it does would be appreciated!



Edit: thanks for the replies. I've done a bit more digging into RS-232. The idle state of the lines is negative, so connecting the converter will provide the negative rail, and as pointed out, the inverter circuit generates the positive rail from it. What through me off was the +5~12V supply pin on the board; It got me thinking that the positive rail was the one that was initially supplied, which of course is not correct.



[Schematic of the RS232 to RS485 converter. The section circled in red is what I am asking about.










share|improve this question















I am reverse engineering an RS-232 to RS-485 converter to understand how it works. I have attached the schematic that I reverse-engineered from the PCB (apologies for the hand-drawn schematic). I've checked it several times and quite certain that it is correct. The part that confuses me is the oscillator circled in red.



I recognize it as an oscillator based based around C2 & R8, and on my scope I can see it running at about 10kHz. I also see that the five parallel inverters on it's output are acting as some sort of buffer. However, what the heck is it there for?



This converter will work completely powered by RS-232 port, even if just the RX, TX, and ground lines (pins 2, 3, & 5 of the DE9) are connected. It does NOT require the +5~12V line to be connected to an external power supply.



The only theory that I have is that the oscillator is acting as some sort of charge pump to reduce the source impedances of Vcc & -Vcc (which otherwise would be limited by the source impedances of the DE9 pins, plus 4.7k for -Vcc via RN1d), but that's just a guess and I don't really see how/why that would work in practice.



So, any pointers on why that oscillator is there and how it achieves whatever it does would be appreciated!



Edit: thanks for the replies. I've done a bit more digging into RS-232. The idle state of the lines is negative, so connecting the converter will provide the negative rail, and as pointed out, the inverter circuit generates the positive rail from it. What through me off was the +5~12V supply pin on the board; It got me thinking that the positive rail was the one that was initially supplied, which of course is not correct.



[Schematic of the RS232 to RS485 converter. The section circled in red is what I am asking about.







converter rs232 rs485






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Sep 17 at 19:04

























asked Sep 16 at 22:57









Chris

334




334











  • Are you sure that nothing else is connected to the CT3 / D6 node?
    – duskwuff
    Sep 16 at 23:39










  • This circuit is a wee bit confusing. You have 2 sources of Vcc. You have a zener diode type power supply and the 74HCT is also being used to create another Vcc. It would help if all voltage tags had a voltage value so we could see what is going on.
    – Sparky256
    Sep 16 at 23:39






  • 8




    See how the 74HCT14 positive supply (pin 14) is ground, and the negative supply (pin 7) is the negative supply rail? The outlined section is indeed a charge pump which will generate a positive supply rail from just the negative supply. Not being familiar with old school rs232 I'm unsure why exactly this is needed, but I do know that the signalling levels swing to both positive and negative voltages.
    – jms
    Sep 16 at 23:45










  • Nice neat drawing!
    – tariksbl
    Sep 20 at 0:35
















  • Are you sure that nothing else is connected to the CT3 / D6 node?
    – duskwuff
    Sep 16 at 23:39










  • This circuit is a wee bit confusing. You have 2 sources of Vcc. You have a zener diode type power supply and the 74HCT is also being used to create another Vcc. It would help if all voltage tags had a voltage value so we could see what is going on.
    – Sparky256
    Sep 16 at 23:39






  • 8




    See how the 74HCT14 positive supply (pin 14) is ground, and the negative supply (pin 7) is the negative supply rail? The outlined section is indeed a charge pump which will generate a positive supply rail from just the negative supply. Not being familiar with old school rs232 I'm unsure why exactly this is needed, but I do know that the signalling levels swing to both positive and negative voltages.
    – jms
    Sep 16 at 23:45










  • Nice neat drawing!
    – tariksbl
    Sep 20 at 0:35















Are you sure that nothing else is connected to the CT3 / D6 node?
– duskwuff
Sep 16 at 23:39




Are you sure that nothing else is connected to the CT3 / D6 node?
– duskwuff
Sep 16 at 23:39












This circuit is a wee bit confusing. You have 2 sources of Vcc. You have a zener diode type power supply and the 74HCT is also being used to create another Vcc. It would help if all voltage tags had a voltage value so we could see what is going on.
– Sparky256
Sep 16 at 23:39




This circuit is a wee bit confusing. You have 2 sources of Vcc. You have a zener diode type power supply and the 74HCT is also being used to create another Vcc. It would help if all voltage tags had a voltage value so we could see what is going on.
– Sparky256
Sep 16 at 23:39




8




8




See how the 74HCT14 positive supply (pin 14) is ground, and the negative supply (pin 7) is the negative supply rail? The outlined section is indeed a charge pump which will generate a positive supply rail from just the negative supply. Not being familiar with old school rs232 I'm unsure why exactly this is needed, but I do know that the signalling levels swing to both positive and negative voltages.
– jms
Sep 16 at 23:45




See how the 74HCT14 positive supply (pin 14) is ground, and the negative supply (pin 7) is the negative supply rail? The outlined section is indeed a charge pump which will generate a positive supply rail from just the negative supply. Not being familiar with old school rs232 I'm unsure why exactly this is needed, but I do know that the signalling levels swing to both positive and negative voltages.
– jms
Sep 16 at 23:45












Nice neat drawing!
– tariksbl
Sep 20 at 0:35




Nice neat drawing!
– tariksbl
Sep 20 at 0:35










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
5
down vote



accepted










Two members claim opposite things, one in a comment and one in an answer. User jms has got it right. The oscillator generates +Vcc if -Vcc happens to be available as a signal in the connected RS232 port. The diodes connect possibly available -Vcc to the oscillator IC. The oscillator charges CT3 from -Vcc and the charge is pushed to maintain +Vcc. That pumping is really needed, if -Vcc happens to be the only available voltage via the RS232 port.



If the port happens to output (through a diode) +Vcc, it's used directly and the voltage minus Vcc is not absolutely needed, altough it helps the stability of the +Vcc voltage.



The design assumes that at least one of voltages -Vcc and +Vcc is available from the RS232 port. RS485 circuit needs only the positive one.






share|improve this answer





























    up vote
    -1
    down vote













    Plan B Analysis



    Since Tx on RS232 is idle at -V -5V ~ -15Vtyp and then clamped and rectified to -6V by zener. So -Vcc is always there with the 10kHz charge pump creating +Vcc. It might get weaker with continuous data. The charge pump uses 10uF series with 10uF load to the charge pump delivers 50%V- with the 5 buffers reducing the output Z to 10 Ohms or so thus 100us=RC. However the RS232 driver impedance is higher so -Vcc is slower to start first followed by +Vcc. D6 charges the series cap with negative pulses to Gnd thus raising the clock above ground and then charging +Vcc thru D6 to CT2.



    I attempted to sketch the current path of the -Vcc startup current. +Vcc is similar above gnd.
    enter image description here



    Any questions?



    old analysis



    The other answer descriptions may seem correct, but the analysis of the schematic appears to be incorrect.



    enter image description here



    This is how I believe it must work.



    But then again it could be charging -Vcc from Tx data on RS232 being -V on idle and start bits being +V then using an inverting charge pump to create +Vcc






    share|improve this answer






















    • Is it arrogance, ignorance or laziness that people vote -1 without comments. Either way useless trolls.
      – Tony EE rocketscientist
      Sep 17 at 2:43







    • 2




      I never downvote answers. But you redesigned the circuit. How can you be sure that there's no wire between 14/U2 and GND? The questioner has the real circuit in his hands.
      – user287001
      Sep 17 at 11:58










    Your Answer




    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("schematics", function ()
    StackExchange.schematics.init();
    );
    , "cicuitlab");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "135"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f396418%2fpurpose-of-this-oscillator-74hct14-based-on-rs-232-to-rs-485-converter%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    5
    down vote



    accepted










    Two members claim opposite things, one in a comment and one in an answer. User jms has got it right. The oscillator generates +Vcc if -Vcc happens to be available as a signal in the connected RS232 port. The diodes connect possibly available -Vcc to the oscillator IC. The oscillator charges CT3 from -Vcc and the charge is pushed to maintain +Vcc. That pumping is really needed, if -Vcc happens to be the only available voltage via the RS232 port.



    If the port happens to output (through a diode) +Vcc, it's used directly and the voltage minus Vcc is not absolutely needed, altough it helps the stability of the +Vcc voltage.



    The design assumes that at least one of voltages -Vcc and +Vcc is available from the RS232 port. RS485 circuit needs only the positive one.






    share|improve this answer


























      up vote
      5
      down vote



      accepted










      Two members claim opposite things, one in a comment and one in an answer. User jms has got it right. The oscillator generates +Vcc if -Vcc happens to be available as a signal in the connected RS232 port. The diodes connect possibly available -Vcc to the oscillator IC. The oscillator charges CT3 from -Vcc and the charge is pushed to maintain +Vcc. That pumping is really needed, if -Vcc happens to be the only available voltage via the RS232 port.



      If the port happens to output (through a diode) +Vcc, it's used directly and the voltage minus Vcc is not absolutely needed, altough it helps the stability of the +Vcc voltage.



      The design assumes that at least one of voltages -Vcc and +Vcc is available from the RS232 port. RS485 circuit needs only the positive one.






      share|improve this answer
























        up vote
        5
        down vote



        accepted







        up vote
        5
        down vote



        accepted






        Two members claim opposite things, one in a comment and one in an answer. User jms has got it right. The oscillator generates +Vcc if -Vcc happens to be available as a signal in the connected RS232 port. The diodes connect possibly available -Vcc to the oscillator IC. The oscillator charges CT3 from -Vcc and the charge is pushed to maintain +Vcc. That pumping is really needed, if -Vcc happens to be the only available voltage via the RS232 port.



        If the port happens to output (through a diode) +Vcc, it's used directly and the voltage minus Vcc is not absolutely needed, altough it helps the stability of the +Vcc voltage.



        The design assumes that at least one of voltages -Vcc and +Vcc is available from the RS232 port. RS485 circuit needs only the positive one.






        share|improve this answer














        Two members claim opposite things, one in a comment and one in an answer. User jms has got it right. The oscillator generates +Vcc if -Vcc happens to be available as a signal in the connected RS232 port. The diodes connect possibly available -Vcc to the oscillator IC. The oscillator charges CT3 from -Vcc and the charge is pushed to maintain +Vcc. That pumping is really needed, if -Vcc happens to be the only available voltage via the RS232 port.



        If the port happens to output (through a diode) +Vcc, it's used directly and the voltage minus Vcc is not absolutely needed, altough it helps the stability of the +Vcc voltage.



        The design assumes that at least one of voltages -Vcc and +Vcc is available from the RS232 port. RS485 circuit needs only the positive one.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Sep 17 at 15:39

























        answered Sep 17 at 0:31









        user287001

        8,3131415




        8,3131415






















            up vote
            -1
            down vote













            Plan B Analysis



            Since Tx on RS232 is idle at -V -5V ~ -15Vtyp and then clamped and rectified to -6V by zener. So -Vcc is always there with the 10kHz charge pump creating +Vcc. It might get weaker with continuous data. The charge pump uses 10uF series with 10uF load to the charge pump delivers 50%V- with the 5 buffers reducing the output Z to 10 Ohms or so thus 100us=RC. However the RS232 driver impedance is higher so -Vcc is slower to start first followed by +Vcc. D6 charges the series cap with negative pulses to Gnd thus raising the clock above ground and then charging +Vcc thru D6 to CT2.



            I attempted to sketch the current path of the -Vcc startup current. +Vcc is similar above gnd.
            enter image description here



            Any questions?



            old analysis



            The other answer descriptions may seem correct, but the analysis of the schematic appears to be incorrect.



            enter image description here



            This is how I believe it must work.



            But then again it could be charging -Vcc from Tx data on RS232 being -V on idle and start bits being +V then using an inverting charge pump to create +Vcc






            share|improve this answer






















            • Is it arrogance, ignorance or laziness that people vote -1 without comments. Either way useless trolls.
              – Tony EE rocketscientist
              Sep 17 at 2:43







            • 2




              I never downvote answers. But you redesigned the circuit. How can you be sure that there's no wire between 14/U2 and GND? The questioner has the real circuit in his hands.
              – user287001
              Sep 17 at 11:58














            up vote
            -1
            down vote













            Plan B Analysis



            Since Tx on RS232 is idle at -V -5V ~ -15Vtyp and then clamped and rectified to -6V by zener. So -Vcc is always there with the 10kHz charge pump creating +Vcc. It might get weaker with continuous data. The charge pump uses 10uF series with 10uF load to the charge pump delivers 50%V- with the 5 buffers reducing the output Z to 10 Ohms or so thus 100us=RC. However the RS232 driver impedance is higher so -Vcc is slower to start first followed by +Vcc. D6 charges the series cap with negative pulses to Gnd thus raising the clock above ground and then charging +Vcc thru D6 to CT2.



            I attempted to sketch the current path of the -Vcc startup current. +Vcc is similar above gnd.
            enter image description here



            Any questions?



            old analysis



            The other answer descriptions may seem correct, but the analysis of the schematic appears to be incorrect.



            enter image description here



            This is how I believe it must work.



            But then again it could be charging -Vcc from Tx data on RS232 being -V on idle and start bits being +V then using an inverting charge pump to create +Vcc






            share|improve this answer






















            • Is it arrogance, ignorance or laziness that people vote -1 without comments. Either way useless trolls.
              – Tony EE rocketscientist
              Sep 17 at 2:43







            • 2




              I never downvote answers. But you redesigned the circuit. How can you be sure that there's no wire between 14/U2 and GND? The questioner has the real circuit in his hands.
              – user287001
              Sep 17 at 11:58












            up vote
            -1
            down vote










            up vote
            -1
            down vote









            Plan B Analysis



            Since Tx on RS232 is idle at -V -5V ~ -15Vtyp and then clamped and rectified to -6V by zener. So -Vcc is always there with the 10kHz charge pump creating +Vcc. It might get weaker with continuous data. The charge pump uses 10uF series with 10uF load to the charge pump delivers 50%V- with the 5 buffers reducing the output Z to 10 Ohms or so thus 100us=RC. However the RS232 driver impedance is higher so -Vcc is slower to start first followed by +Vcc. D6 charges the series cap with negative pulses to Gnd thus raising the clock above ground and then charging +Vcc thru D6 to CT2.



            I attempted to sketch the current path of the -Vcc startup current. +Vcc is similar above gnd.
            enter image description here



            Any questions?



            old analysis



            The other answer descriptions may seem correct, but the analysis of the schematic appears to be incorrect.



            enter image description here



            This is how I believe it must work.



            But then again it could be charging -Vcc from Tx data on RS232 being -V on idle and start bits being +V then using an inverting charge pump to create +Vcc






            share|improve this answer














            Plan B Analysis



            Since Tx on RS232 is idle at -V -5V ~ -15Vtyp and then clamped and rectified to -6V by zener. So -Vcc is always there with the 10kHz charge pump creating +Vcc. It might get weaker with continuous data. The charge pump uses 10uF series with 10uF load to the charge pump delivers 50%V- with the 5 buffers reducing the output Z to 10 Ohms or so thus 100us=RC. However the RS232 driver impedance is higher so -Vcc is slower to start first followed by +Vcc. D6 charges the series cap with negative pulses to Gnd thus raising the clock above ground and then charging +Vcc thru D6 to CT2.



            I attempted to sketch the current path of the -Vcc startup current. +Vcc is similar above gnd.
            enter image description here



            Any questions?



            old analysis



            The other answer descriptions may seem correct, but the analysis of the schematic appears to be incorrect.



            enter image description here



            This is how I believe it must work.



            But then again it could be charging -Vcc from Tx data on RS232 being -V on idle and start bits being +V then using an inverting charge pump to create +Vcc







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited Sep 17 at 14:49

























            answered Sep 17 at 1:41









            Tony EE rocketscientist

            59.2k22088




            59.2k22088











            • Is it arrogance, ignorance or laziness that people vote -1 without comments. Either way useless trolls.
              – Tony EE rocketscientist
              Sep 17 at 2:43







            • 2




              I never downvote answers. But you redesigned the circuit. How can you be sure that there's no wire between 14/U2 and GND? The questioner has the real circuit in his hands.
              – user287001
              Sep 17 at 11:58
















            • Is it arrogance, ignorance or laziness that people vote -1 without comments. Either way useless trolls.
              – Tony EE rocketscientist
              Sep 17 at 2:43







            • 2




              I never downvote answers. But you redesigned the circuit. How can you be sure that there's no wire between 14/U2 and GND? The questioner has the real circuit in his hands.
              – user287001
              Sep 17 at 11:58















            Is it arrogance, ignorance or laziness that people vote -1 without comments. Either way useless trolls.
            – Tony EE rocketscientist
            Sep 17 at 2:43





            Is it arrogance, ignorance or laziness that people vote -1 without comments. Either way useless trolls.
            – Tony EE rocketscientist
            Sep 17 at 2:43





            2




            2




            I never downvote answers. But you redesigned the circuit. How can you be sure that there's no wire between 14/U2 and GND? The questioner has the real circuit in his hands.
            – user287001
            Sep 17 at 11:58




            I never downvote answers. But you redesigned the circuit. How can you be sure that there's no wire between 14/U2 and GND? The questioner has the real circuit in his hands.
            – user287001
            Sep 17 at 11:58

















             

            draft saved


            draft discarded















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f396418%2fpurpose-of-this-oscillator-74hct14-based-on-rs-232-to-rs-485-converter%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest













































































            Popular posts from this blog

            How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

            Bahrain

            Postfix configuration issue with fips on centos 7; mailgun relay