How to get all substrings (contiguous subsequences) of my JavaScript array?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
15
down vote

favorite
2












My task is to split the given array into smaller arrays using JavaScript. For example [1, 2, 3, 4] should be split to [1] [1, 2] [1, 2, 3] [1, 2, 3, 4] [2] [2, 3] [2, 3, 4] [3] [3, 4] [4].



I am using this code:






let arr = [1, 2, 3, 4];

for (let i = 1; i <= arr.length; i++)
let a = ;
for (let j = 0; j < arr.length; j++)
a.push(arr[j]);
if (a.length === i)
break;


console.log(a);





And I get the following result: [1] [1, 2] [1, 2, 3] [1, 2, 3, 4] undefined



What am I missing/doing wrong?










share|improve this question























  • I think you should set j=i in begin loop
    – Alexandr Kudryashov
    Sep 17 at 8:14










  • @AlexandrKudryashov I have tried. It is not correct
    – TeodorKolev
    Sep 17 at 8:15










  • set j=i and remove the if condition in the nested loop
    – rock star
    Sep 17 at 8:16










  • init i with 0 and remove the = symbol in the corresponding condition
    – rock star
    Sep 17 at 8:17






  • 1




    @rockstar nope, it is not correct
    – TeodorKolev
    Sep 17 at 8:17














up vote
15
down vote

favorite
2












My task is to split the given array into smaller arrays using JavaScript. For example [1, 2, 3, 4] should be split to [1] [1, 2] [1, 2, 3] [1, 2, 3, 4] [2] [2, 3] [2, 3, 4] [3] [3, 4] [4].



I am using this code:






let arr = [1, 2, 3, 4];

for (let i = 1; i <= arr.length; i++)
let a = ;
for (let j = 0; j < arr.length; j++)
a.push(arr[j]);
if (a.length === i)
break;


console.log(a);





And I get the following result: [1] [1, 2] [1, 2, 3] [1, 2, 3, 4] undefined



What am I missing/doing wrong?










share|improve this question























  • I think you should set j=i in begin loop
    – Alexandr Kudryashov
    Sep 17 at 8:14










  • @AlexandrKudryashov I have tried. It is not correct
    – TeodorKolev
    Sep 17 at 8:15










  • set j=i and remove the if condition in the nested loop
    – rock star
    Sep 17 at 8:16










  • init i with 0 and remove the = symbol in the corresponding condition
    – rock star
    Sep 17 at 8:17






  • 1




    @rockstar nope, it is not correct
    – TeodorKolev
    Sep 17 at 8:17












up vote
15
down vote

favorite
2









up vote
15
down vote

favorite
2






2





My task is to split the given array into smaller arrays using JavaScript. For example [1, 2, 3, 4] should be split to [1] [1, 2] [1, 2, 3] [1, 2, 3, 4] [2] [2, 3] [2, 3, 4] [3] [3, 4] [4].



I am using this code:






let arr = [1, 2, 3, 4];

for (let i = 1; i <= arr.length; i++)
let a = ;
for (let j = 0; j < arr.length; j++)
a.push(arr[j]);
if (a.length === i)
break;


console.log(a);





And I get the following result: [1] [1, 2] [1, 2, 3] [1, 2, 3, 4] undefined



What am I missing/doing wrong?










share|improve this question















My task is to split the given array into smaller arrays using JavaScript. For example [1, 2, 3, 4] should be split to [1] [1, 2] [1, 2, 3] [1, 2, 3, 4] [2] [2, 3] [2, 3, 4] [3] [3, 4] [4].



I am using this code:






let arr = [1, 2, 3, 4];

for (let i = 1; i <= arr.length; i++)
let a = ;
for (let j = 0; j < arr.length; j++)
a.push(arr[j]);
if (a.length === i)
break;


console.log(a);





And I get the following result: [1] [1, 2] [1, 2, 3] [1, 2, 3, 4] undefined



What am I missing/doing wrong?






let arr = [1, 2, 3, 4];

for (let i = 1; i <= arr.length; i++)
let a = ;
for (let j = 0; j < arr.length; j++)
a.push(arr[j]);
if (a.length === i)
break;


console.log(a);





let arr = [1, 2, 3, 4];

for (let i = 1; i <= arr.length; i++)
let a = ;
for (let j = 0; j < arr.length; j++)
a.push(arr[j]);
if (a.length === i)
break;


console.log(a);






javascript arrays substring






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Sep 17 at 10:06









Bergi

349k54509833




349k54509833










asked Sep 17 at 8:10









TeodorKolev

1,02052045




1,02052045











  • I think you should set j=i in begin loop
    – Alexandr Kudryashov
    Sep 17 at 8:14










  • @AlexandrKudryashov I have tried. It is not correct
    – TeodorKolev
    Sep 17 at 8:15










  • set j=i and remove the if condition in the nested loop
    – rock star
    Sep 17 at 8:16










  • init i with 0 and remove the = symbol in the corresponding condition
    – rock star
    Sep 17 at 8:17






  • 1




    @rockstar nope, it is not correct
    – TeodorKolev
    Sep 17 at 8:17
















  • I think you should set j=i in begin loop
    – Alexandr Kudryashov
    Sep 17 at 8:14










  • @AlexandrKudryashov I have tried. It is not correct
    – TeodorKolev
    Sep 17 at 8:15










  • set j=i and remove the if condition in the nested loop
    – rock star
    Sep 17 at 8:16










  • init i with 0 and remove the = symbol in the corresponding condition
    – rock star
    Sep 17 at 8:17






  • 1




    @rockstar nope, it is not correct
    – TeodorKolev
    Sep 17 at 8:17















I think you should set j=i in begin loop
– Alexandr Kudryashov
Sep 17 at 8:14




I think you should set j=i in begin loop
– Alexandr Kudryashov
Sep 17 at 8:14












@AlexandrKudryashov I have tried. It is not correct
– TeodorKolev
Sep 17 at 8:15




@AlexandrKudryashov I have tried. It is not correct
– TeodorKolev
Sep 17 at 8:15












set j=i and remove the if condition in the nested loop
– rock star
Sep 17 at 8:16




set j=i and remove the if condition in the nested loop
– rock star
Sep 17 at 8:16












init i with 0 and remove the = symbol in the corresponding condition
– rock star
Sep 17 at 8:17




init i with 0 and remove the = symbol in the corresponding condition
– rock star
Sep 17 at 8:17




1




1




@rockstar nope, it is not correct
– TeodorKolev
Sep 17 at 8:17




@rockstar nope, it is not correct
– TeodorKolev
Sep 17 at 8:17












6 Answers
6






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
11
down vote



accepted










You have two issues in your code:



  1. You need to have loop to initialize with the value of i for the inner loop so that it consider the next index for new iteration of i

  2. You need to remove that break on the length which you have in inner loop.




let arr = [1, 2, 3, 4];
for (let i = 0; i <= arr.length; i++)
let a = ;
for (let j = i; j < arr.length; j++)
a.push(arr[j]);
console.log(a);









share|improve this answer




















  • It might be worth noting that this code is logging the same array a to the console on successive iterations of the inner loop, and modifying it in between. Admittedly, this is what the OP's code does, too, but it's likely to surprise anyone who tries to naively modify this code e.g. to collect all the subsequences in a single array and return it. Nina Scholz's answer provides a more easily generalizable solution using .slice().
    – Ilmari Karonen
    Sep 17 at 15:31







  • 1




    Outer loop should use < instead of <=. It currently does an extra iteration only to be broken on the next line where you check j < arr.length.
    – Salman A
    Sep 20 at 0:45

















up vote
16
down vote













For the inner array, you could just start with the index of the outer array.






var array = [1, 2, 3, 4],
i, j, l = array.length,
result = ;

for (i = 0; i < l; i++)
for (j = i; j < l; j++)
result.push(array.slice(i, j + 1));


console.log(result.map(a => a.join(' ')));

.as-console-wrapper max-height: 100% !important; top: 0; 








share|improve this answer


















  • 2




    I was expecting answer from you :)
    – Ankit Agarwal
    Sep 17 at 8:18










  • This do one big array. Target is to create small arrays
    – TeodorKolev
    Sep 17 at 8:19










  • what do you want with small arrays? instead of pushing, you could display the sub array.
    – Nina Scholz
    Sep 17 at 8:22










  • Like! +1, for SO console style's hack :D
    – l2aelba
    Sep 17 at 13:24


















up vote
2
down vote













Try this






 let arr = [1, 2, 3, 4];
for (let i = 0; i <= arr.length; i++)
let a = ;
for (let j = i; j < arr.length; j++)
a.push(arr[j]);
console.log(a);









share|improve this answer


















  • 4




    Why do you need the tmp variable?
    – Jenny O'Reilly
    Sep 17 at 8:22










  • you can do it without tmp variable=)
    – Alexandr Kudryashov
    Sep 17 at 8:23

















up vote
0
down vote













If you don't want to mutate your array.

 let arr = [1, 2, 3, 4];
let res = ;
for (let i = 0; i <= arr.length; i++)
let a = ;
for (let j = i; j < arr.length; j++)
a = [...a, arr[j]];
res = [...res, a];


console.log(res);





share|improve this answer





























    up vote
    0
    down vote













    i have prepare stackblitz for this case.



    let source = [1,2,3,4];
    const output = ;
    const arrayMultiplier = (source) =>
    const eachValueArray = ;
    source.forEach((item, index) =>
    // Will push new array who will be sliced source array.
    eachValueArray.push(source.slice(0, source.length - index));
    );
    //We reverse array to have right order.
    return eachValueArray.reverse();
    ;

    for(let i = 0; i <= source.length; i++)
    output.push(...arrayMultiplier(source));
    source.shift(); // Will recraft source array by removing first index.

    //Don't forget last item.
    output.push(source);
    console.log(output);


    Is not the most shorten solution but do the job



    == update after code review ==



    // [...]
    const arrayMultiplier = (source) =>
    // Will push new array who will be sliced source array.
    // We reverse array to have right order.
    return source.map((item, index) => source.slice(0, source.length - index)).reverse();
    ;
    // [...]





    share|improve this answer






















    • Avoid forEach + push, use map instead
      – Bergi
      Sep 17 at 10:02










    • yes si true @Bergi
      – Yanis-git
      Sep 17 at 10:50

















    up vote
    0
    down vote













    Use two iteration



    1. get slice array based on loop index.

    2. use sliced array and combine array element.




     var arr = [1, 2, 3, 4];
    let newArra =;
    arr.map((x,i)=>
    let remainArr = arr.slice(i);
    return remainArr.forEach((y, r) => newArra.push(remainArr.slice(0, r+1)))
    )
    newArra.forEach(x=> console.log(x))








    share|improve this answer


















    • 1




      @EricDuminil Thanks, Made the required changes.
      – Anoop
      Sep 17 at 12:06










    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
    StackExchange.snippets.init();
    );
    );
    , "code-snippets");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "1"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f52363370%2fhow-to-get-all-substrings-contiguous-subsequences-of-my-javascript-array%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    6 Answers
    6






    active

    oldest

    votes








    6 Answers
    6






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    11
    down vote



    accepted










    You have two issues in your code:



    1. You need to have loop to initialize with the value of i for the inner loop so that it consider the next index for new iteration of i

    2. You need to remove that break on the length which you have in inner loop.




    let arr = [1, 2, 3, 4];
    for (let i = 0; i <= arr.length; i++)
    let a = ;
    for (let j = i; j < arr.length; j++)
    a.push(arr[j]);
    console.log(a);









    share|improve this answer




















    • It might be worth noting that this code is logging the same array a to the console on successive iterations of the inner loop, and modifying it in between. Admittedly, this is what the OP's code does, too, but it's likely to surprise anyone who tries to naively modify this code e.g. to collect all the subsequences in a single array and return it. Nina Scholz's answer provides a more easily generalizable solution using .slice().
      – Ilmari Karonen
      Sep 17 at 15:31







    • 1




      Outer loop should use < instead of <=. It currently does an extra iteration only to be broken on the next line where you check j < arr.length.
      – Salman A
      Sep 20 at 0:45














    up vote
    11
    down vote



    accepted










    You have two issues in your code:



    1. You need to have loop to initialize with the value of i for the inner loop so that it consider the next index for new iteration of i

    2. You need to remove that break on the length which you have in inner loop.




    let arr = [1, 2, 3, 4];
    for (let i = 0; i <= arr.length; i++)
    let a = ;
    for (let j = i; j < arr.length; j++)
    a.push(arr[j]);
    console.log(a);









    share|improve this answer




















    • It might be worth noting that this code is logging the same array a to the console on successive iterations of the inner loop, and modifying it in between. Admittedly, this is what the OP's code does, too, but it's likely to surprise anyone who tries to naively modify this code e.g. to collect all the subsequences in a single array and return it. Nina Scholz's answer provides a more easily generalizable solution using .slice().
      – Ilmari Karonen
      Sep 17 at 15:31







    • 1




      Outer loop should use < instead of <=. It currently does an extra iteration only to be broken on the next line where you check j < arr.length.
      – Salman A
      Sep 20 at 0:45












    up vote
    11
    down vote



    accepted







    up vote
    11
    down vote



    accepted






    You have two issues in your code:



    1. You need to have loop to initialize with the value of i for the inner loop so that it consider the next index for new iteration of i

    2. You need to remove that break on the length which you have in inner loop.




    let arr = [1, 2, 3, 4];
    for (let i = 0; i <= arr.length; i++)
    let a = ;
    for (let j = i; j < arr.length; j++)
    a.push(arr[j]);
    console.log(a);









    share|improve this answer












    You have two issues in your code:



    1. You need to have loop to initialize with the value of i for the inner loop so that it consider the next index for new iteration of i

    2. You need to remove that break on the length which you have in inner loop.




    let arr = [1, 2, 3, 4];
    for (let i = 0; i <= arr.length; i++)
    let a = ;
    for (let j = i; j < arr.length; j++)
    a.push(arr[j]);
    console.log(a);









    let arr = [1, 2, 3, 4];
    for (let i = 0; i <= arr.length; i++)
    let a = ;
    for (let j = i; j < arr.length; j++)
    a.push(arr[j]);
    console.log(a);






    let arr = [1, 2, 3, 4];
    for (let i = 0; i <= arr.length; i++)
    let a = ;
    for (let j = i; j < arr.length; j++)
    a.push(arr[j]);
    console.log(a);







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Sep 17 at 8:22









    Ankit Agarwal

    21.8k41841




    21.8k41841











    • It might be worth noting that this code is logging the same array a to the console on successive iterations of the inner loop, and modifying it in between. Admittedly, this is what the OP's code does, too, but it's likely to surprise anyone who tries to naively modify this code e.g. to collect all the subsequences in a single array and return it. Nina Scholz's answer provides a more easily generalizable solution using .slice().
      – Ilmari Karonen
      Sep 17 at 15:31







    • 1




      Outer loop should use < instead of <=. It currently does an extra iteration only to be broken on the next line where you check j < arr.length.
      – Salman A
      Sep 20 at 0:45
















    • It might be worth noting that this code is logging the same array a to the console on successive iterations of the inner loop, and modifying it in between. Admittedly, this is what the OP's code does, too, but it's likely to surprise anyone who tries to naively modify this code e.g. to collect all the subsequences in a single array and return it. Nina Scholz's answer provides a more easily generalizable solution using .slice().
      – Ilmari Karonen
      Sep 17 at 15:31







    • 1




      Outer loop should use < instead of <=. It currently does an extra iteration only to be broken on the next line where you check j < arr.length.
      – Salman A
      Sep 20 at 0:45















    It might be worth noting that this code is logging the same array a to the console on successive iterations of the inner loop, and modifying it in between. Admittedly, this is what the OP's code does, too, but it's likely to surprise anyone who tries to naively modify this code e.g. to collect all the subsequences in a single array and return it. Nina Scholz's answer provides a more easily generalizable solution using .slice().
    – Ilmari Karonen
    Sep 17 at 15:31





    It might be worth noting that this code is logging the same array a to the console on successive iterations of the inner loop, and modifying it in between. Admittedly, this is what the OP's code does, too, but it's likely to surprise anyone who tries to naively modify this code e.g. to collect all the subsequences in a single array and return it. Nina Scholz's answer provides a more easily generalizable solution using .slice().
    – Ilmari Karonen
    Sep 17 at 15:31





    1




    1




    Outer loop should use < instead of <=. It currently does an extra iteration only to be broken on the next line where you check j < arr.length.
    – Salman A
    Sep 20 at 0:45




    Outer loop should use < instead of <=. It currently does an extra iteration only to be broken on the next line where you check j < arr.length.
    – Salman A
    Sep 20 at 0:45












    up vote
    16
    down vote













    For the inner array, you could just start with the index of the outer array.






    var array = [1, 2, 3, 4],
    i, j, l = array.length,
    result = ;

    for (i = 0; i < l; i++)
    for (j = i; j < l; j++)
    result.push(array.slice(i, j + 1));


    console.log(result.map(a => a.join(' ')));

    .as-console-wrapper max-height: 100% !important; top: 0; 








    share|improve this answer


















    • 2




      I was expecting answer from you :)
      – Ankit Agarwal
      Sep 17 at 8:18










    • This do one big array. Target is to create small arrays
      – TeodorKolev
      Sep 17 at 8:19










    • what do you want with small arrays? instead of pushing, you could display the sub array.
      – Nina Scholz
      Sep 17 at 8:22










    • Like! +1, for SO console style's hack :D
      – l2aelba
      Sep 17 at 13:24















    up vote
    16
    down vote













    For the inner array, you could just start with the index of the outer array.






    var array = [1, 2, 3, 4],
    i, j, l = array.length,
    result = ;

    for (i = 0; i < l; i++)
    for (j = i; j < l; j++)
    result.push(array.slice(i, j + 1));


    console.log(result.map(a => a.join(' ')));

    .as-console-wrapper max-height: 100% !important; top: 0; 








    share|improve this answer


















    • 2




      I was expecting answer from you :)
      – Ankit Agarwal
      Sep 17 at 8:18










    • This do one big array. Target is to create small arrays
      – TeodorKolev
      Sep 17 at 8:19










    • what do you want with small arrays? instead of pushing, you could display the sub array.
      – Nina Scholz
      Sep 17 at 8:22










    • Like! +1, for SO console style's hack :D
      – l2aelba
      Sep 17 at 13:24













    up vote
    16
    down vote










    up vote
    16
    down vote









    For the inner array, you could just start with the index of the outer array.






    var array = [1, 2, 3, 4],
    i, j, l = array.length,
    result = ;

    for (i = 0; i < l; i++)
    for (j = i; j < l; j++)
    result.push(array.slice(i, j + 1));


    console.log(result.map(a => a.join(' ')));

    .as-console-wrapper max-height: 100% !important; top: 0; 








    share|improve this answer














    For the inner array, you could just start with the index of the outer array.






    var array = [1, 2, 3, 4],
    i, j, l = array.length,
    result = ;

    for (i = 0; i < l; i++)
    for (j = i; j < l; j++)
    result.push(array.slice(i, j + 1));


    console.log(result.map(a => a.join(' ')));

    .as-console-wrapper max-height: 100% !important; top: 0; 








    var array = [1, 2, 3, 4],
    i, j, l = array.length,
    result = ;

    for (i = 0; i < l; i++)
    for (j = i; j < l; j++)
    result.push(array.slice(i, j + 1));


    console.log(result.map(a => a.join(' ')));

    .as-console-wrapper max-height: 100% !important; top: 0; 





    var array = [1, 2, 3, 4],
    i, j, l = array.length,
    result = ;

    for (i = 0; i < l; i++)
    for (j = i; j < l; j++)
    result.push(array.slice(i, j + 1));


    console.log(result.map(a => a.join(' ')));

    .as-console-wrapper max-height: 100% !important; top: 0; 






    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Sep 17 at 20:58

























    answered Sep 17 at 8:17









    Nina Scholz

    161k1280141




    161k1280141







    • 2




      I was expecting answer from you :)
      – Ankit Agarwal
      Sep 17 at 8:18










    • This do one big array. Target is to create small arrays
      – TeodorKolev
      Sep 17 at 8:19










    • what do you want with small arrays? instead of pushing, you could display the sub array.
      – Nina Scholz
      Sep 17 at 8:22










    • Like! +1, for SO console style's hack :D
      – l2aelba
      Sep 17 at 13:24













    • 2




      I was expecting answer from you :)
      – Ankit Agarwal
      Sep 17 at 8:18










    • This do one big array. Target is to create small arrays
      – TeodorKolev
      Sep 17 at 8:19










    • what do you want with small arrays? instead of pushing, you could display the sub array.
      – Nina Scholz
      Sep 17 at 8:22










    • Like! +1, for SO console style's hack :D
      – l2aelba
      Sep 17 at 13:24








    2




    2




    I was expecting answer from you :)
    – Ankit Agarwal
    Sep 17 at 8:18




    I was expecting answer from you :)
    – Ankit Agarwal
    Sep 17 at 8:18












    This do one big array. Target is to create small arrays
    – TeodorKolev
    Sep 17 at 8:19




    This do one big array. Target is to create small arrays
    – TeodorKolev
    Sep 17 at 8:19












    what do you want with small arrays? instead of pushing, you could display the sub array.
    – Nina Scholz
    Sep 17 at 8:22




    what do you want with small arrays? instead of pushing, you could display the sub array.
    – Nina Scholz
    Sep 17 at 8:22












    Like! +1, for SO console style's hack :D
    – l2aelba
    Sep 17 at 13:24





    Like! +1, for SO console style's hack :D
    – l2aelba
    Sep 17 at 13:24











    up vote
    2
    down vote













    Try this






     let arr = [1, 2, 3, 4];
    for (let i = 0; i <= arr.length; i++)
    let a = ;
    for (let j = i; j < arr.length; j++)
    a.push(arr[j]);
    console.log(a);









    share|improve this answer


















    • 4




      Why do you need the tmp variable?
      – Jenny O'Reilly
      Sep 17 at 8:22










    • you can do it without tmp variable=)
      – Alexandr Kudryashov
      Sep 17 at 8:23














    up vote
    2
    down vote













    Try this






     let arr = [1, 2, 3, 4];
    for (let i = 0; i <= arr.length; i++)
    let a = ;
    for (let j = i; j < arr.length; j++)
    a.push(arr[j]);
    console.log(a);









    share|improve this answer


















    • 4




      Why do you need the tmp variable?
      – Jenny O'Reilly
      Sep 17 at 8:22










    • you can do it without tmp variable=)
      – Alexandr Kudryashov
      Sep 17 at 8:23












    up vote
    2
    down vote










    up vote
    2
    down vote









    Try this






     let arr = [1, 2, 3, 4];
    for (let i = 0; i <= arr.length; i++)
    let a = ;
    for (let j = i; j < arr.length; j++)
    a.push(arr[j]);
    console.log(a);









    share|improve this answer














    Try this






     let arr = [1, 2, 3, 4];
    for (let i = 0; i <= arr.length; i++)
    let a = ;
    for (let j = i; j < arr.length; j++)
    a.push(arr[j]);
    console.log(a);









     let arr = [1, 2, 3, 4];
    for (let i = 0; i <= arr.length; i++)
    let a = ;
    for (let j = i; j < arr.length; j++)
    a.push(arr[j]);
    console.log(a);






     let arr = [1, 2, 3, 4];
    for (let i = 0; i <= arr.length; i++)
    let a = ;
    for (let j = i; j < arr.length; j++)
    a.push(arr[j]);
    console.log(a);







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Sep 18 at 8:30

























    answered Sep 17 at 8:19









    Alexandr Kudryashov

    567213




    567213







    • 4




      Why do you need the tmp variable?
      – Jenny O'Reilly
      Sep 17 at 8:22










    • you can do it without tmp variable=)
      – Alexandr Kudryashov
      Sep 17 at 8:23












    • 4




      Why do you need the tmp variable?
      – Jenny O'Reilly
      Sep 17 at 8:22










    • you can do it without tmp variable=)
      – Alexandr Kudryashov
      Sep 17 at 8:23







    4




    4




    Why do you need the tmp variable?
    – Jenny O'Reilly
    Sep 17 at 8:22




    Why do you need the tmp variable?
    – Jenny O'Reilly
    Sep 17 at 8:22












    you can do it without tmp variable=)
    – Alexandr Kudryashov
    Sep 17 at 8:23




    you can do it without tmp variable=)
    – Alexandr Kudryashov
    Sep 17 at 8:23










    up vote
    0
    down vote













    If you don't want to mutate your array.

     let arr = [1, 2, 3, 4];
    let res = ;
    for (let i = 0; i <= arr.length; i++)
    let a = ;
    for (let j = i; j < arr.length; j++)
    a = [...a, arr[j]];
    res = [...res, a];


    console.log(res);





    share|improve this answer


























      up vote
      0
      down vote













      If you don't want to mutate your array.

       let arr = [1, 2, 3, 4];
      let res = ;
      for (let i = 0; i <= arr.length; i++)
      let a = ;
      for (let j = i; j < arr.length; j++)
      a = [...a, arr[j]];
      res = [...res, a];


      console.log(res);





      share|improve this answer
























        up vote
        0
        down vote










        up vote
        0
        down vote









        If you don't want to mutate your array.

         let arr = [1, 2, 3, 4];
        let res = ;
        for (let i = 0; i <= arr.length; i++)
        let a = ;
        for (let j = i; j < arr.length; j++)
        a = [...a, arr[j]];
        res = [...res, a];


        console.log(res);





        share|improve this answer














        If you don't want to mutate your array.

         let arr = [1, 2, 3, 4];
        let res = ;
        for (let i = 0; i <= arr.length; i++)
        let a = ;
        for (let j = i; j < arr.length; j++)
        a = [...a, arr[j]];
        res = [...res, a];


        console.log(res);






        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Sep 17 at 9:48









        Yanis-git

        1,4471318




        1,4471318










        answered Sep 17 at 9:32









        Varun Arya

        11




        11




















            up vote
            0
            down vote













            i have prepare stackblitz for this case.



            let source = [1,2,3,4];
            const output = ;
            const arrayMultiplier = (source) =>
            const eachValueArray = ;
            source.forEach((item, index) =>
            // Will push new array who will be sliced source array.
            eachValueArray.push(source.slice(0, source.length - index));
            );
            //We reverse array to have right order.
            return eachValueArray.reverse();
            ;

            for(let i = 0; i <= source.length; i++)
            output.push(...arrayMultiplier(source));
            source.shift(); // Will recraft source array by removing first index.

            //Don't forget last item.
            output.push(source);
            console.log(output);


            Is not the most shorten solution but do the job



            == update after code review ==



            // [...]
            const arrayMultiplier = (source) =>
            // Will push new array who will be sliced source array.
            // We reverse array to have right order.
            return source.map((item, index) => source.slice(0, source.length - index)).reverse();
            ;
            // [...]





            share|improve this answer






















            • Avoid forEach + push, use map instead
              – Bergi
              Sep 17 at 10:02










            • yes si true @Bergi
              – Yanis-git
              Sep 17 at 10:50














            up vote
            0
            down vote













            i have prepare stackblitz for this case.



            let source = [1,2,3,4];
            const output = ;
            const arrayMultiplier = (source) =>
            const eachValueArray = ;
            source.forEach((item, index) =>
            // Will push new array who will be sliced source array.
            eachValueArray.push(source.slice(0, source.length - index));
            );
            //We reverse array to have right order.
            return eachValueArray.reverse();
            ;

            for(let i = 0; i <= source.length; i++)
            output.push(...arrayMultiplier(source));
            source.shift(); // Will recraft source array by removing first index.

            //Don't forget last item.
            output.push(source);
            console.log(output);


            Is not the most shorten solution but do the job



            == update after code review ==



            // [...]
            const arrayMultiplier = (source) =>
            // Will push new array who will be sliced source array.
            // We reverse array to have right order.
            return source.map((item, index) => source.slice(0, source.length - index)).reverse();
            ;
            // [...]





            share|improve this answer






















            • Avoid forEach + push, use map instead
              – Bergi
              Sep 17 at 10:02










            • yes si true @Bergi
              – Yanis-git
              Sep 17 at 10:50












            up vote
            0
            down vote










            up vote
            0
            down vote









            i have prepare stackblitz for this case.



            let source = [1,2,3,4];
            const output = ;
            const arrayMultiplier = (source) =>
            const eachValueArray = ;
            source.forEach((item, index) =>
            // Will push new array who will be sliced source array.
            eachValueArray.push(source.slice(0, source.length - index));
            );
            //We reverse array to have right order.
            return eachValueArray.reverse();
            ;

            for(let i = 0; i <= source.length; i++)
            output.push(...arrayMultiplier(source));
            source.shift(); // Will recraft source array by removing first index.

            //Don't forget last item.
            output.push(source);
            console.log(output);


            Is not the most shorten solution but do the job



            == update after code review ==



            // [...]
            const arrayMultiplier = (source) =>
            // Will push new array who will be sliced source array.
            // We reverse array to have right order.
            return source.map((item, index) => source.slice(0, source.length - index)).reverse();
            ;
            // [...]





            share|improve this answer














            i have prepare stackblitz for this case.



            let source = [1,2,3,4];
            const output = ;
            const arrayMultiplier = (source) =>
            const eachValueArray = ;
            source.forEach((item, index) =>
            // Will push new array who will be sliced source array.
            eachValueArray.push(source.slice(0, source.length - index));
            );
            //We reverse array to have right order.
            return eachValueArray.reverse();
            ;

            for(let i = 0; i <= source.length; i++)
            output.push(...arrayMultiplier(source));
            source.shift(); // Will recraft source array by removing first index.

            //Don't forget last item.
            output.push(source);
            console.log(output);


            Is not the most shorten solution but do the job



            == update after code review ==



            // [...]
            const arrayMultiplier = (source) =>
            // Will push new array who will be sliced source array.
            // We reverse array to have right order.
            return source.map((item, index) => source.slice(0, source.length - index)).reverse();
            ;
            // [...]






            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited Sep 17 at 10:56

























            answered Sep 17 at 8:35









            Yanis-git

            1,4471318




            1,4471318











            • Avoid forEach + push, use map instead
              – Bergi
              Sep 17 at 10:02










            • yes si true @Bergi
              – Yanis-git
              Sep 17 at 10:50
















            • Avoid forEach + push, use map instead
              – Bergi
              Sep 17 at 10:02










            • yes si true @Bergi
              – Yanis-git
              Sep 17 at 10:50















            Avoid forEach + push, use map instead
            – Bergi
            Sep 17 at 10:02




            Avoid forEach + push, use map instead
            – Bergi
            Sep 17 at 10:02












            yes si true @Bergi
            – Yanis-git
            Sep 17 at 10:50




            yes si true @Bergi
            – Yanis-git
            Sep 17 at 10:50










            up vote
            0
            down vote













            Use two iteration



            1. get slice array based on loop index.

            2. use sliced array and combine array element.




             var arr = [1, 2, 3, 4];
            let newArra =;
            arr.map((x,i)=>
            let remainArr = arr.slice(i);
            return remainArr.forEach((y, r) => newArra.push(remainArr.slice(0, r+1)))
            )
            newArra.forEach(x=> console.log(x))








            share|improve this answer


















            • 1




              @EricDuminil Thanks, Made the required changes.
              – Anoop
              Sep 17 at 12:06














            up vote
            0
            down vote













            Use two iteration



            1. get slice array based on loop index.

            2. use sliced array and combine array element.




             var arr = [1, 2, 3, 4];
            let newArra =;
            arr.map((x,i)=>
            let remainArr = arr.slice(i);
            return remainArr.forEach((y, r) => newArra.push(remainArr.slice(0, r+1)))
            )
            newArra.forEach(x=> console.log(x))








            share|improve this answer


















            • 1




              @EricDuminil Thanks, Made the required changes.
              – Anoop
              Sep 17 at 12:06












            up vote
            0
            down vote










            up vote
            0
            down vote









            Use two iteration



            1. get slice array based on loop index.

            2. use sliced array and combine array element.




             var arr = [1, 2, 3, 4];
            let newArra =;
            arr.map((x,i)=>
            let remainArr = arr.slice(i);
            return remainArr.forEach((y, r) => newArra.push(remainArr.slice(0, r+1)))
            )
            newArra.forEach(x=> console.log(x))








            share|improve this answer














            Use two iteration



            1. get slice array based on loop index.

            2. use sliced array and combine array element.




             var arr = [1, 2, 3, 4];
            let newArra =;
            arr.map((x,i)=>
            let remainArr = arr.slice(i);
            return remainArr.forEach((y, r) => newArra.push(remainArr.slice(0, r+1)))
            )
            newArra.forEach(x=> console.log(x))








             var arr = [1, 2, 3, 4];
            let newArra =;
            arr.map((x,i)=>
            let remainArr = arr.slice(i);
            return remainArr.forEach((y, r) => newArra.push(remainArr.slice(0, r+1)))
            )
            newArra.forEach(x=> console.log(x))





             var arr = [1, 2, 3, 4];
            let newArra =;
            arr.map((x,i)=>
            let remainArr = arr.slice(i);
            return remainArr.forEach((y, r) => newArra.push(remainArr.slice(0, r+1)))
            )
            newArra.forEach(x=> console.log(x))






            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited Sep 17 at 12:05

























            answered Sep 17 at 8:29









            Anoop

            18.8k94568




            18.8k94568







            • 1




              @EricDuminil Thanks, Made the required changes.
              – Anoop
              Sep 17 at 12:06












            • 1




              @EricDuminil Thanks, Made the required changes.
              – Anoop
              Sep 17 at 12:06







            1




            1




            @EricDuminil Thanks, Made the required changes.
            – Anoop
            Sep 17 at 12:06




            @EricDuminil Thanks, Made the required changes.
            – Anoop
            Sep 17 at 12:06

















             

            draft saved


            draft discarded















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f52363370%2fhow-to-get-all-substrings-contiguous-subsequences-of-my-javascript-array%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest













































































            Popular posts from this blog

            How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

            Displaying single band from multi-band raster using QGIS

            How many registers does an x86_64 CPU actually have?