Multi-line long equation vanishes few brackets

up vote
5
down vote

favorite

begineqnarray* 
M to P_j: & left left( n_1,n_2,left( profile,N_i,N_ileft( mathop leftrightarrow limits^K_S^i right)P_j,\ & # left( N_ileft( mathop leftrightarrow limits^K_S^i right)P_j right) right)_K_P^j right)_K_P^j,left( n_0,n_1,left( profile,N_i,N_i \ &left( mathop leftrightarrow limits^K_S^i right)P_j,# left( N_ileft( mathop leftrightarrow limits^K_S^i right)P_j right) right)_K_P^j,N_ileft( mathop leftrightarrow limits^K_S^i right)P_j, \ &# left( N_ileft( mathop leftrightarrow limits^K_S^i right)P_j right),N_imathop leftrightarrow limits^n_S^i M right)_K_TS^i = Hleft( K_p^j oplus n_S^i right) right
endeqnarray*

To split my long equation I used beginequation beginsplit, begineqnarray*,and beginmultline etc. But all the time few brackets from equation just disapear as shown in figure below.

enter image description here

The correct equation is given below and I want to split it into 4 lines

enter image description here

edited Sep 13 at 7:22

Mico

264k30355733

asked Sep 13 at 5:57

MBK

1262

1

(1) Never use eqnarray it is broken in many ways and only kept for backwards compatability. Use the macros from amsmath. (2) You cannot!!! break a left ... right construction across lines, you need to scale these manuallt. From the last image you post, you can clearly see that those fences are way too large, and the readability would benefit greatly by manual scaling. (3) Use a better construction to write above leftrightarrow, for example load the mathtools package, it provides the missing xleftrightarrow... that is missing from amsmath.
â€“Â daleif
Sep 13 at 7:33

1

(4) Also you cannot have \ inside a ... group, so you'll need to clean that up as well.
â€“Â daleif
Sep 13 at 7:36

add a commentÂ |Â

up vote
5
down vote

favorite

begineqnarray* 
M to P_j: & left left( n_1,n_2,left( profile,N_i,N_ileft( mathop leftrightarrow limits^K_S^i right)P_j,\ & # left( N_ileft( mathop leftrightarrow limits^K_S^i right)P_j right) right)_K_P^j right)_K_P^j,left( n_0,n_1,left( profile,N_i,N_i \ &left( mathop leftrightarrow limits^K_S^i right)P_j,# left( N_ileft( mathop leftrightarrow limits^K_S^i right)P_j right) right)_K_P^j,N_ileft( mathop leftrightarrow limits^K_S^i right)P_j, \ &# left( N_ileft( mathop leftrightarrow limits^K_S^i right)P_j right),N_imathop leftrightarrow limits^n_S^i M right)_K_TS^i = Hleft( K_p^j oplus n_S^i right) right
endeqnarray*

To split my long equation I used beginequation beginsplit, begineqnarray*,and beginmultline etc. But all the time few brackets from equation just disapear as shown in figure below.

enter image description here

The correct equation is given below and I want to split it into 4 lines

enter image description here

edited Sep 13 at 7:22

Mico

264k30355733

asked Sep 13 at 5:57

MBK

1262

1

(1) Never use eqnarray it is broken in many ways and only kept for backwards compatability. Use the macros from amsmath. (2) You cannot!!! break a left ... right construction across lines, you need to scale these manuallt. From the last image you post, you can clearly see that those fences are way too large, and the readability would benefit greatly by manual scaling. (3) Use a better construction to write above leftrightarrow, for example load the mathtools package, it provides the missing xleftrightarrow... that is missing from amsmath.
â€“Â daleif
Sep 13 at 7:33

1

(4) Also you cannot have \ inside a ... group, so you'll need to clean that up as well.
â€“Â daleif
Sep 13 at 7:36

add a commentÂ |Â

up vote
5
down vote

favorite

begineqnarray* 
M to P_j: & left left( n_1,n_2,left( profile,N_i,N_ileft( mathop leftrightarrow limits^K_S^i right)P_j,\ & # left( N_ileft( mathop leftrightarrow limits^K_S^i right)P_j right) right)_K_P^j right)_K_P^j,left( n_0,n_1,left( profile,N_i,N_i \ &left( mathop leftrightarrow limits^K_S^i right)P_j,# left( N_ileft( mathop leftrightarrow limits^K_S^i right)P_j right) right)_K_P^j,N_ileft( mathop leftrightarrow limits^K_S^i right)P_j, \ &# left( N_ileft( mathop leftrightarrow limits^K_S^i right)P_j right),N_imathop leftrightarrow limits^n_S^i M right)_K_TS^i = Hleft( K_p^j oplus n_S^i right) right
endeqnarray*

To split my long equation I used beginequation beginsplit, begineqnarray*,and beginmultline etc. But all the time few brackets from equation just disapear as shown in figure below.

enter image description here

The correct equation is given below and I want to split it into 4 lines

enter image description here

edited Sep 13 at 7:22

Mico

264k30355733

asked Sep 13 at 5:57

MBK

1262

begineqnarray* 
M to P_j: & left left( n_1,n_2,left( profile,N_i,N_ileft( mathop leftrightarrow limits^K_S^i right)P_j,\ & # left( N_ileft( mathop leftrightarrow limits^K_S^i right)P_j right) right)_K_P^j right)_K_P^j,left( n_0,n_1,left( profile,N_i,N_i \ &left( mathop leftrightarrow limits^K_S^i right)P_j,# left( N_ileft( mathop leftrightarrow limits^K_S^i right)P_j right) right)_K_P^j,N_ileft( mathop leftrightarrow limits^K_S^i right)P_j, \ &# left( N_ileft( mathop leftrightarrow limits^K_S^i right)P_j right),N_imathop leftrightarrow limits^n_S^i M right)_K_TS^i = Hleft( K_p^j oplus n_S^i right) right
endeqnarray*

To split my long equation I used beginequation beginsplit, begineqnarray*,and beginmultline etc. But all the time few brackets from equation just disapear as shown in figure below.

enter image description here

The correct equation is given below and I want to split it into 4 lines

enter image description here

equations split eqnarray

edited Sep 13 at 7:22

Mico

264k30355733

asked Sep 13 at 5:57

MBK

1262

edited Sep 13 at 7:22

Mico

264k30355733

asked Sep 13 at 5:57

MBK

1262

edited Sep 13 at 7:22

Mico

264k30355733

edited Sep 13 at 7:22

Mico

264k30355733

edited Sep 13 at 7:22

Mico

264k30355733

asked Sep 13 at 5:57

MBK

1262

asked Sep 13 at 5:57

MBK

1262

asked Sep 13 at 5:57

MBK

1262

1

(1) Never use eqnarray it is broken in many ways and only kept for backwards compatability. Use the macros from amsmath. (2) You cannot!!! break a left ... right construction across lines, you need to scale these manuallt. From the last image you post, you can clearly see that those fences are way too large, and the readability would benefit greatly by manual scaling. (3) Use a better construction to write above leftrightarrow, for example load the mathtools package, it provides the missing xleftrightarrow... that is missing from amsmath.
â€“Â daleif
Sep 13 at 7:33

1

(4) Also you cannot have \ inside a ... group, so you'll need to clean that up as well.
â€“Â daleif
Sep 13 at 7:36

add a commentÂ |Â

1

(1) Never use eqnarray it is broken in many ways and only kept for backwards compatability. Use the macros from amsmath. (2) You cannot!!! break a left ... right construction across lines, you need to scale these manuallt. From the last image you post, you can clearly see that those fences are way too large, and the readability would benefit greatly by manual scaling. (3) Use a better construction to write above leftrightarrow, for example load the mathtools package, it provides the missing xleftrightarrow... that is missing from amsmath.
â€“Â daleif
Sep 13 at 7:33

1

(4) Also you cannot have \ inside a ... group, so you'll need to clean that up as well.
â€“Â daleif
Sep 13 at 7:36

(1) Never use eqnarray it is broken in many ways and only kept for backwards compatability. Use the macros from amsmath. (2) You cannot!!! break a left ... right construction across lines, you need to scale these manuallt. From the last image you post, you can clearly see that those fences are way too large, and the readability would benefit greatly by manual scaling. (3) Use a better construction to write above leftrightarrow, for example load the mathtools package, it provides the missing xleftrightarrow... that is missing from amsmath.
â€“Â daleif
Sep 13 at 7:33

(4) Also you cannot have \ inside a ... group, so you'll need to clean that up as well.
â€“Â daleif
Sep 13 at 7:36

add a commentÂ |Â

1 Answer
1

active

oldest

votes

up vote
7
down vote

Some suggestions:

Don't overuse curly braces to group math elements. A proliferation of and symbols makes the code nearly unreadable -- while doing absolutely nothing for TeX's ability to actually typeset the mess.

As @daleif has already pointed out in a comment, do not use eqnarray: It is seriously deprecated. Use align instead. When using align, use & only to indicate alignment points. Don't forget to terminate lines with \ (double backslash).

Don't use left and right for this multiline equation. It can't work. Instead, use big, Big, bigg and Bigg sizing directives.

Since there are quite a few parenthetic expressions, consider using square brackets instead of round parentheses for some of them.

Optional: Use ! ("negative thinspace") directives to "snug up" subscript terms.

Finally, again as @daleif has pointed out, load the mathtools package and use the xleftrightarrow macro instead of mathopleftrightarrowlimits. (At any rate, limits isn't needed.)

With these observations in mind, I think it's possible to display the equation across three, rather than four, rows.

enter image description here

documentclassarticle
usepackagemathtools % for 'xleftrightarrow' macro
begindocument
beginalign*
M to P_jcolon 
Biggl 
&biggl[ n_1, n_2, Bigl( 
 textprofile, N_i,
 N_i(xleftrightarrowK_S^i)P_j,
 # bigl( N_i(xleftrightarrowK_S^i) P_j bigr) 
 Bigr)_!K_!P^j 
 biggr]_K_!P^j, \
&biggl[ n_0, n_1, Bigl( 
 textprofile, N_i,
 N_i(xleftrightarrowK_S^i)P_j,
 # bigl( N_i(xleftrightarrowK_S^i)P_j bigr)
 Bigr)_!K_!P^j, \
&quad 
 N_i(xleftrightarrowK_S^i)P_j,
 # bigl( N_i(xleftrightarrowK_S^i)P_j bigr),
 N_ixleftrightarrown_S^iM 
 biggr]_K_mathitTS^i = H(K_!P^j oplus n_S^i)
Biggr
endalign*
enddocument

edited Sep 13 at 12:20

answered Sep 13 at 8:23

Mico

264k30355733

you're right of course, I'll delete my comment
â€“Â daleif
Sep 13 at 8:59

add a commentÂ |Â

Your Answer

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);

);

draft saved

draft discarded

StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f450662%2fmulti-line-long-equation-vanishes-few-brackets%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest

Name

1 Answer
1

active

oldest

votes

1 Answer
1

active

oldest

votes

up vote
7
down vote

Some suggestions:

Don't overuse curly braces to group math elements. A proliferation of and symbols makes the code nearly unreadable -- while doing absolutely nothing for TeX's ability to actually typeset the mess.

As @daleif has already pointed out in a comment, do not use eqnarray: It is seriously deprecated. Use align instead. When using align, use & only to indicate alignment points. Don't forget to terminate lines with \ (double backslash).

Don't use left and right for this multiline equation. It can't work. Instead, use big, Big, bigg and Bigg sizing directives.

Since there are quite a few parenthetic expressions, consider using square brackets instead of round parentheses for some of them.

Optional: Use ! ("negative thinspace") directives to "snug up" subscript terms.

Finally, again as @daleif has pointed out, load the mathtools package and use the xleftrightarrow macro instead of mathopleftrightarrowlimits. (At any rate, limits isn't needed.)

With these observations in mind, I think it's possible to display the equation across three, rather than four, rows.

enter image description here

documentclassarticle
usepackagemathtools % for 'xleftrightarrow' macro
begindocument
beginalign*
M to P_jcolon 
Biggl 
&biggl[ n_1, n_2, Bigl( 
 textprofile, N_i,
 N_i(xleftrightarrowK_S^i)P_j,
 # bigl( N_i(xleftrightarrowK_S^i) P_j bigr) 
 Bigr)_!K_!P^j 
 biggr]_K_!P^j, \
&biggl[ n_0, n_1, Bigl( 
 textprofile, N_i,
 N_i(xleftrightarrowK_S^i)P_j,
 # bigl( N_i(xleftrightarrowK_S^i)P_j bigr)
 Bigr)_!K_!P^j, \
&quad 
 N_i(xleftrightarrowK_S^i)P_j,
 # bigl( N_i(xleftrightarrowK_S^i)P_j bigr),
 N_ixleftrightarrown_S^iM 
 biggr]_K_mathitTS^i = H(K_!P^j oplus n_S^i)
Biggr
endalign*
enddocument

edited Sep 13 at 12:20

answered Sep 13 at 8:23

Mico

264k30355733

you're right of course, I'll delete my comment
â€“Â daleif
Sep 13 at 8:59

add a commentÂ |Â

up vote
7
down vote

Some suggestions:

Don't overuse curly braces to group math elements. A proliferation of and symbols makes the code nearly unreadable -- while doing absolutely nothing for TeX's ability to actually typeset the mess.

As @daleif has already pointed out in a comment, do not use eqnarray: It is seriously deprecated. Use align instead. When using align, use & only to indicate alignment points. Don't forget to terminate lines with \ (double backslash).

Don't use left and right for this multiline equation. It can't work. Instead, use big, Big, bigg and Bigg sizing directives.

Since there are quite a few parenthetic expressions, consider using square brackets instead of round parentheses for some of them.

Optional: Use ! ("negative thinspace") directives to "snug up" subscript terms.

Finally, again as @daleif has pointed out, load the mathtools package and use the xleftrightarrow macro instead of mathopleftrightarrowlimits. (At any rate, limits isn't needed.)

With these observations in mind, I think it's possible to display the equation across three, rather than four, rows.

enter image description here

documentclassarticle
usepackagemathtools % for 'xleftrightarrow' macro
begindocument
beginalign*
M to P_jcolon 
Biggl 
&biggl[ n_1, n_2, Bigl( 
 textprofile, N_i,
 N_i(xleftrightarrowK_S^i)P_j,
 # bigl( N_i(xleftrightarrowK_S^i) P_j bigr) 
 Bigr)_!K_!P^j 
 biggr]_K_!P^j, \
&biggl[ n_0, n_1, Bigl( 
 textprofile, N_i,
 N_i(xleftrightarrowK_S^i)P_j,
 # bigl( N_i(xleftrightarrowK_S^i)P_j bigr)
 Bigr)_!K_!P^j, \
&quad 
 N_i(xleftrightarrowK_S^i)P_j,
 # bigl( N_i(xleftrightarrowK_S^i)P_j bigr),
 N_ixleftrightarrown_S^iM 
 biggr]_K_mathitTS^i = H(K_!P^j oplus n_S^i)
Biggr
endalign*
enddocument

edited Sep 13 at 12:20

answered Sep 13 at 8:23

Mico

264k30355733

you're right of course, I'll delete my comment
â€“Â daleif
Sep 13 at 8:59

add a commentÂ |Â

up vote
7
down vote

Some suggestions:

Don't overuse curly braces to group math elements. A proliferation of and symbols makes the code nearly unreadable -- while doing absolutely nothing for TeX's ability to actually typeset the mess.

As @daleif has already pointed out in a comment, do not use eqnarray: It is seriously deprecated. Use align instead. When using align, use & only to indicate alignment points. Don't forget to terminate lines with \ (double backslash).

Don't use left and right for this multiline equation. It can't work. Instead, use big, Big, bigg and Bigg sizing directives.

Since there are quite a few parenthetic expressions, consider using square brackets instead of round parentheses for some of them.

Optional: Use ! ("negative thinspace") directives to "snug up" subscript terms.

Finally, again as @daleif has pointed out, load the mathtools package and use the xleftrightarrow macro instead of mathopleftrightarrowlimits. (At any rate, limits isn't needed.)

With these observations in mind, I think it's possible to display the equation across three, rather than four, rows.

enter image description here

documentclassarticle
usepackagemathtools % for 'xleftrightarrow' macro
begindocument
beginalign*
M to P_jcolon 
Biggl 
&biggl[ n_1, n_2, Bigl( 
 textprofile, N_i,
 N_i(xleftrightarrowK_S^i)P_j,
 # bigl( N_i(xleftrightarrowK_S^i) P_j bigr) 
 Bigr)_!K_!P^j 
 biggr]_K_!P^j, \
&biggl[ n_0, n_1, Bigl( 
 textprofile, N_i,
 N_i(xleftrightarrowK_S^i)P_j,
 # bigl( N_i(xleftrightarrowK_S^i)P_j bigr)
 Bigr)_!K_!P^j, \
&quad 
 N_i(xleftrightarrowK_S^i)P_j,
 # bigl( N_i(xleftrightarrowK_S^i)P_j bigr),
 N_ixleftrightarrown_S^iM 
 biggr]_K_mathitTS^i = H(K_!P^j oplus n_S^i)
Biggr
endalign*
enddocument

edited Sep 13 at 12:20

answered Sep 13 at 8:23

Mico

264k30355733

Some suggestions:

Don't overuse curly braces to group math elements. A proliferation of and symbols makes the code nearly unreadable -- while doing absolutely nothing for TeX's ability to actually typeset the mess.

As @daleif has already pointed out in a comment, do not use eqnarray: It is seriously deprecated. Use align instead. When using align, use & only to indicate alignment points. Don't forget to terminate lines with \ (double backslash).

Don't use left and right for this multiline equation. It can't work. Instead, use big, Big, bigg and Bigg sizing directives.

Since there are quite a few parenthetic expressions, consider using square brackets instead of round parentheses for some of them.

Optional: Use ! ("negative thinspace") directives to "snug up" subscript terms.

Finally, again as @daleif has pointed out, load the mathtools package and use the xleftrightarrow macro instead of mathopleftrightarrowlimits. (At any rate, limits isn't needed.)

With these observations in mind, I think it's possible to display the equation across three, rather than four, rows.

enter image description here

documentclassarticle
usepackagemathtools % for 'xleftrightarrow' macro
begindocument
beginalign*
M to P_jcolon 
Biggl 
&biggl[ n_1, n_2, Bigl( 
 textprofile, N_i,
 N_i(xleftrightarrowK_S^i)P_j,
 # bigl( N_i(xleftrightarrowK_S^i) P_j bigr) 
 Bigr)_!K_!P^j 
 biggr]_K_!P^j, \
&biggl[ n_0, n_1, Bigl( 
 textprofile, N_i,
 N_i(xleftrightarrowK_S^i)P_j,
 # bigl( N_i(xleftrightarrowK_S^i)P_j bigr)
 Bigr)_!K_!P^j, \
&quad 
 N_i(xleftrightarrowK_S^i)P_j,
 # bigl( N_i(xleftrightarrowK_S^i)P_j bigr),
 N_ixleftrightarrown_S^iM 
 biggr]_K_mathitTS^i = H(K_!P^j oplus n_S^i)
Biggr
endalign*
enddocument

edited Sep 13 at 12:20

answered Sep 13 at 8:23

Mico

264k30355733

edited Sep 13 at 12:20

answered Sep 13 at 8:23

Mico

264k30355733

answered Sep 13 at 8:23

Mico

264k30355733

answered Sep 13 at 8:23

Mico

264k30355733

you're right of course, I'll delete my comment
â€“Â daleif
Sep 13 at 8:59

add a commentÂ |Â

you're right of course, I'll delete my comment
â€“Â daleif
Sep 13 at 8:59

you're right of course, I'll delete my comment
â€“Â daleif
Sep 13 at 8:59

add a commentÂ |Â

draft saved

draft discarded

draft saved

draft discarded

Post as a guest

Name

搜尋此網誌

mjhjmtu