du disk usage and apparent size huge difference (Terabytes vs Kilobytes)
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I know that when using du utility, disk usage is bigger than apparent size because of the blocks that are not fully used. But here there is something else. On a particular folder, du without apparent-size returns 97T, with the flag, 24K. Nothing particularly interesting on that folder tho
root@ubuntu1604:/usr/share/icons/hicolor/symbolic/apps# ls -lha
total 97T
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4.0K Sep 8 06:30 .
drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4.0K Dec 2 2016 ..
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1.9K Apr 4 2016 cheese-symbolic.svg
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3.6K Sep 6 05:35 firefox-symbolic.svg
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 5.5K Nov 12 2015 gnome-aisleriot-symbolic.svg
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2.3K Nov 4 2015 gnome-power-statistics-symbolic.svg
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1.6K Apr 8 2016 orca-symbolic.svg
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1.7K Sep 14 2016 org.gnome.Calendar-symbolic.svg
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1.7K Oct 27 2015 seahorse-symbolic.svg
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1.4K Aug 22 2016 session-properties-symbolic.svg
root@ubuntu1604:/usr/share/icons/hicolor/symbolic/apps# du -h
97T .
root@ubuntu1604:/usr/share/icons/hicolor/symbolic/apps# du -h --apparent-size
24K .
root@ubuntu1604:/usr/share/icons/hicolor/symbolic/apps# du -b
23935 .
root@ubuntu1604:/usr/share/icons/hicolor/symbolic/apps# uname -a
Linux ubuntu1604 4.4.0-134-generic #160-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 15 14:58:00 UTC 2018 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
root@ubuntu1604:/usr/share/icons/hicolor/symbolic/apps# df -h | grep "/$"
/dev/sda2 218G 188G 19G 92% /
Why is this happening? (This is a VM on a ESXi server)
virtual-machine disk-usage
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I know that when using du utility, disk usage is bigger than apparent size because of the blocks that are not fully used. But here there is something else. On a particular folder, du without apparent-size returns 97T, with the flag, 24K. Nothing particularly interesting on that folder tho
root@ubuntu1604:/usr/share/icons/hicolor/symbolic/apps# ls -lha
total 97T
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4.0K Sep 8 06:30 .
drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4.0K Dec 2 2016 ..
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1.9K Apr 4 2016 cheese-symbolic.svg
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3.6K Sep 6 05:35 firefox-symbolic.svg
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 5.5K Nov 12 2015 gnome-aisleriot-symbolic.svg
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2.3K Nov 4 2015 gnome-power-statistics-symbolic.svg
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1.6K Apr 8 2016 orca-symbolic.svg
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1.7K Sep 14 2016 org.gnome.Calendar-symbolic.svg
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1.7K Oct 27 2015 seahorse-symbolic.svg
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1.4K Aug 22 2016 session-properties-symbolic.svg
root@ubuntu1604:/usr/share/icons/hicolor/symbolic/apps# du -h
97T .
root@ubuntu1604:/usr/share/icons/hicolor/symbolic/apps# du -h --apparent-size
24K .
root@ubuntu1604:/usr/share/icons/hicolor/symbolic/apps# du -b
23935 .
root@ubuntu1604:/usr/share/icons/hicolor/symbolic/apps# uname -a
Linux ubuntu1604 4.4.0-134-generic #160-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 15 14:58:00 UTC 2018 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
root@ubuntu1604:/usr/share/icons/hicolor/symbolic/apps# df -h | grep "/$"
/dev/sda2 218G 188G 19G 92% /
Why is this happening? (This is a VM on a ESXi server)
virtual-machine disk-usage
The output of the commanddu -h
are the sizes for every directory and subdirectory. How you gott97T
?
â Goro
Sep 13 at 14:23
What doesfsck
say about this filesystem? (I'm going to bet that it will find some errors!)
â ErikF
Sep 13 at 15:52
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I know that when using du utility, disk usage is bigger than apparent size because of the blocks that are not fully used. But here there is something else. On a particular folder, du without apparent-size returns 97T, with the flag, 24K. Nothing particularly interesting on that folder tho
root@ubuntu1604:/usr/share/icons/hicolor/symbolic/apps# ls -lha
total 97T
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4.0K Sep 8 06:30 .
drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4.0K Dec 2 2016 ..
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1.9K Apr 4 2016 cheese-symbolic.svg
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3.6K Sep 6 05:35 firefox-symbolic.svg
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 5.5K Nov 12 2015 gnome-aisleriot-symbolic.svg
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2.3K Nov 4 2015 gnome-power-statistics-symbolic.svg
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1.6K Apr 8 2016 orca-symbolic.svg
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1.7K Sep 14 2016 org.gnome.Calendar-symbolic.svg
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1.7K Oct 27 2015 seahorse-symbolic.svg
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1.4K Aug 22 2016 session-properties-symbolic.svg
root@ubuntu1604:/usr/share/icons/hicolor/symbolic/apps# du -h
97T .
root@ubuntu1604:/usr/share/icons/hicolor/symbolic/apps# du -h --apparent-size
24K .
root@ubuntu1604:/usr/share/icons/hicolor/symbolic/apps# du -b
23935 .
root@ubuntu1604:/usr/share/icons/hicolor/symbolic/apps# uname -a
Linux ubuntu1604 4.4.0-134-generic #160-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 15 14:58:00 UTC 2018 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
root@ubuntu1604:/usr/share/icons/hicolor/symbolic/apps# df -h | grep "/$"
/dev/sda2 218G 188G 19G 92% /
Why is this happening? (This is a VM on a ESXi server)
virtual-machine disk-usage
I know that when using du utility, disk usage is bigger than apparent size because of the blocks that are not fully used. But here there is something else. On a particular folder, du without apparent-size returns 97T, with the flag, 24K. Nothing particularly interesting on that folder tho
root@ubuntu1604:/usr/share/icons/hicolor/symbolic/apps# ls -lha
total 97T
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4.0K Sep 8 06:30 .
drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4.0K Dec 2 2016 ..
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1.9K Apr 4 2016 cheese-symbolic.svg
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3.6K Sep 6 05:35 firefox-symbolic.svg
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 5.5K Nov 12 2015 gnome-aisleriot-symbolic.svg
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2.3K Nov 4 2015 gnome-power-statistics-symbolic.svg
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1.6K Apr 8 2016 orca-symbolic.svg
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1.7K Sep 14 2016 org.gnome.Calendar-symbolic.svg
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1.7K Oct 27 2015 seahorse-symbolic.svg
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1.4K Aug 22 2016 session-properties-symbolic.svg
root@ubuntu1604:/usr/share/icons/hicolor/symbolic/apps# du -h
97T .
root@ubuntu1604:/usr/share/icons/hicolor/symbolic/apps# du -h --apparent-size
24K .
root@ubuntu1604:/usr/share/icons/hicolor/symbolic/apps# du -b
23935 .
root@ubuntu1604:/usr/share/icons/hicolor/symbolic/apps# uname -a
Linux ubuntu1604 4.4.0-134-generic #160-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 15 14:58:00 UTC 2018 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
root@ubuntu1604:/usr/share/icons/hicolor/symbolic/apps# df -h | grep "/$"
/dev/sda2 218G 188G 19G 92% /
Why is this happening? (This is a VM on a ESXi server)
virtual-machine disk-usage
virtual-machine disk-usage
asked Sep 13 at 14:01
J Placeholder
1
1
The output of the commanddu -h
are the sizes for every directory and subdirectory. How you gott97T
?
â Goro
Sep 13 at 14:23
What doesfsck
say about this filesystem? (I'm going to bet that it will find some errors!)
â ErikF
Sep 13 at 15:52
add a comment |Â
The output of the commanddu -h
are the sizes for every directory and subdirectory. How you gott97T
?
â Goro
Sep 13 at 14:23
What doesfsck
say about this filesystem? (I'm going to bet that it will find some errors!)
â ErikF
Sep 13 at 15:52
The output of the command
du -h
are the sizes for every directory and subdirectory. How you gott 97T
?â Goro
Sep 13 at 14:23
The output of the command
du -h
are the sizes for every directory and subdirectory. How you gott 97T
?â Goro
Sep 13 at 14:23
What does
fsck
say about this filesystem? (I'm going to bet that it will find some errors!)â ErikF
Sep 13 at 15:52
What does
fsck
say about this filesystem? (I'm going to bet that it will find some errors!)â ErikF
Sep 13 at 15:52
add a comment |Â
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f468802%2fdu-disk-usage-and-apparent-size-huge-difference-terabytes-vs-kilobytes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
The output of the command
du -h
are the sizes for every directory and subdirectory. How you gott97T
?â Goro
Sep 13 at 14:23
What does
fsck
say about this filesystem? (I'm going to bet that it will find some errors!)â ErikF
Sep 13 at 15:52