How to make a thesis that can be read from both sides?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP












7















Soon I will have to hand in my thesis for my PhD. For my thesis I want to make a book that consists of two parts. You open on one side and you read the first part and turn it over to read the other part. Does anyone know how to make this in LateX? Is there a package for this?



Thanks!










share|improve this question

















  • 16





    Welcome to TeX.SE. Are your sure the PhD commission or your supversor(s) will appreciate such a style? or do you just want to annoy them? ;-)

    – Christian Hupfer
    Jan 2 at 16:46






  • 1





    How much textual/typesetting interdependency is there between the two parts — e.g. will they have a single shared bibliography, or two separate bibliographies? If the two parts are mostly independent, then it might be easiest to typeset them separately with LaTeX, and then stitch the pdf’s together afterwards with a pdf editing tool.

    – Peter LeFanu Lumsdaine
    Jan 2 at 16:47






  • 4





    Would be funny to see how this works with requirements like "first page must contain foo, last page must be bar"

    – samcarter
    Jan 2 at 16:48











  • Oooops.... supversor should read supervisor of course... Sorry...

    – Christian Hupfer
    Jan 2 at 22:20











  • Thank you guys for the comments! @ChristianHupfer: The final printed version would be like that, not the electronic version because that is really annoying indeed.

    – physicist
    Jan 3 at 10:52















7















Soon I will have to hand in my thesis for my PhD. For my thesis I want to make a book that consists of two parts. You open on one side and you read the first part and turn it over to read the other part. Does anyone know how to make this in LateX? Is there a package for this?



Thanks!










share|improve this question

















  • 16





    Welcome to TeX.SE. Are your sure the PhD commission or your supversor(s) will appreciate such a style? or do you just want to annoy them? ;-)

    – Christian Hupfer
    Jan 2 at 16:46






  • 1





    How much textual/typesetting interdependency is there between the two parts — e.g. will they have a single shared bibliography, or two separate bibliographies? If the two parts are mostly independent, then it might be easiest to typeset them separately with LaTeX, and then stitch the pdf’s together afterwards with a pdf editing tool.

    – Peter LeFanu Lumsdaine
    Jan 2 at 16:47






  • 4





    Would be funny to see how this works with requirements like "first page must contain foo, last page must be bar"

    – samcarter
    Jan 2 at 16:48











  • Oooops.... supversor should read supervisor of course... Sorry...

    – Christian Hupfer
    Jan 2 at 22:20











  • Thank you guys for the comments! @ChristianHupfer: The final printed version would be like that, not the electronic version because that is really annoying indeed.

    – physicist
    Jan 3 at 10:52













7












7








7








Soon I will have to hand in my thesis for my PhD. For my thesis I want to make a book that consists of two parts. You open on one side and you read the first part and turn it over to read the other part. Does anyone know how to make this in LateX? Is there a package for this?



Thanks!










share|improve this question














Soon I will have to hand in my thesis for my PhD. For my thesis I want to make a book that consists of two parts. You open on one side and you read the first part and turn it over to read the other part. Does anyone know how to make this in LateX? Is there a package for this?



Thanks!







thesis






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Jan 2 at 16:41









physicistphysicist

361




361







  • 16





    Welcome to TeX.SE. Are your sure the PhD commission or your supversor(s) will appreciate such a style? or do you just want to annoy them? ;-)

    – Christian Hupfer
    Jan 2 at 16:46






  • 1





    How much textual/typesetting interdependency is there between the two parts — e.g. will they have a single shared bibliography, or two separate bibliographies? If the two parts are mostly independent, then it might be easiest to typeset them separately with LaTeX, and then stitch the pdf’s together afterwards with a pdf editing tool.

    – Peter LeFanu Lumsdaine
    Jan 2 at 16:47






  • 4





    Would be funny to see how this works with requirements like "first page must contain foo, last page must be bar"

    – samcarter
    Jan 2 at 16:48











  • Oooops.... supversor should read supervisor of course... Sorry...

    – Christian Hupfer
    Jan 2 at 22:20











  • Thank you guys for the comments! @ChristianHupfer: The final printed version would be like that, not the electronic version because that is really annoying indeed.

    – physicist
    Jan 3 at 10:52












  • 16





    Welcome to TeX.SE. Are your sure the PhD commission or your supversor(s) will appreciate such a style? or do you just want to annoy them? ;-)

    – Christian Hupfer
    Jan 2 at 16:46






  • 1





    How much textual/typesetting interdependency is there between the two parts — e.g. will they have a single shared bibliography, or two separate bibliographies? If the two parts are mostly independent, then it might be easiest to typeset them separately with LaTeX, and then stitch the pdf’s together afterwards with a pdf editing tool.

    – Peter LeFanu Lumsdaine
    Jan 2 at 16:47






  • 4





    Would be funny to see how this works with requirements like "first page must contain foo, last page must be bar"

    – samcarter
    Jan 2 at 16:48











  • Oooops.... supversor should read supervisor of course... Sorry...

    – Christian Hupfer
    Jan 2 at 22:20











  • Thank you guys for the comments! @ChristianHupfer: The final printed version would be like that, not the electronic version because that is really annoying indeed.

    – physicist
    Jan 3 at 10:52







16




16





Welcome to TeX.SE. Are your sure the PhD commission or your supversor(s) will appreciate such a style? or do you just want to annoy them? ;-)

– Christian Hupfer
Jan 2 at 16:46





Welcome to TeX.SE. Are your sure the PhD commission or your supversor(s) will appreciate such a style? or do you just want to annoy them? ;-)

– Christian Hupfer
Jan 2 at 16:46




1




1





How much textual/typesetting interdependency is there between the two parts — e.g. will they have a single shared bibliography, or two separate bibliographies? If the two parts are mostly independent, then it might be easiest to typeset them separately with LaTeX, and then stitch the pdf’s together afterwards with a pdf editing tool.

– Peter LeFanu Lumsdaine
Jan 2 at 16:47





How much textual/typesetting interdependency is there between the two parts — e.g. will they have a single shared bibliography, or two separate bibliographies? If the two parts are mostly independent, then it might be easiest to typeset them separately with LaTeX, and then stitch the pdf’s together afterwards with a pdf editing tool.

– Peter LeFanu Lumsdaine
Jan 2 at 16:47




4




4





Would be funny to see how this works with requirements like "first page must contain foo, last page must be bar"

– samcarter
Jan 2 at 16:48





Would be funny to see how this works with requirements like "first page must contain foo, last page must be bar"

– samcarter
Jan 2 at 16:48













Oooops.... supversor should read supervisor of course... Sorry...

– Christian Hupfer
Jan 2 at 22:20





Oooops.... supversor should read supervisor of course... Sorry...

– Christian Hupfer
Jan 2 at 22:20













Thank you guys for the comments! @ChristianHupfer: The final printed version would be like that, not the electronic version because that is really annoying indeed.

– physicist
Jan 3 at 10:52





Thank you guys for the comments! @ChristianHupfer: The final printed version would be like that, not the electronic version because that is really annoying indeed.

– physicist
Jan 3 at 10:52










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















12














Here is a 'stupid' idea:



Write two separate docs and include them as 1st part with regular order and the second one with the pages in reversed order and rotated.



Alternatively: Write one doc and choose the page range explicitly, which should go for the first part and as well for the 2nd (reversed) part.



The easiest way is includepdffrom pdfpages package -- but this will lose the cross-referencing and hyperlinks, but the later are for a printed document not really useful. ToC etc. is little bit difficult, but should be possible.



documentclassbook

usepackagepdfpages

titleHow to annoy people
authorA.U Thor
date2063/4/5

begindocument

includepdf[pages=-]dummydoc1.pdf

includepdf[pages=last-1,angle=-180]dummydoc2.pdf

enddocument


Here is dummydoc1.tex (and dummydoc2.tex is pretty much the same.)



documentclassarticle

usepackageblindtext

pagestyleempty
begindocument
sectionBeginning jobname
blindtext[50]
enddocument


enter image description hereenter image description here






share|improve this answer

























  • Great, thanks! Let me see if I can make this idea work for me :)

    – physicist
    Jan 3 at 10:54











  • @physicist: Since there are no other answers yet, consider to accept my answer, please

    – Christian Hupfer
    Jan 11 at 15:49










Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f468279%2fhow-to-make-a-thesis-that-can-be-read-from-both-sides%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









12














Here is a 'stupid' idea:



Write two separate docs and include them as 1st part with regular order and the second one with the pages in reversed order and rotated.



Alternatively: Write one doc and choose the page range explicitly, which should go for the first part and as well for the 2nd (reversed) part.



The easiest way is includepdffrom pdfpages package -- but this will lose the cross-referencing and hyperlinks, but the later are for a printed document not really useful. ToC etc. is little bit difficult, but should be possible.



documentclassbook

usepackagepdfpages

titleHow to annoy people
authorA.U Thor
date2063/4/5

begindocument

includepdf[pages=-]dummydoc1.pdf

includepdf[pages=last-1,angle=-180]dummydoc2.pdf

enddocument


Here is dummydoc1.tex (and dummydoc2.tex is pretty much the same.)



documentclassarticle

usepackageblindtext

pagestyleempty
begindocument
sectionBeginning jobname
blindtext[50]
enddocument


enter image description hereenter image description here






share|improve this answer

























  • Great, thanks! Let me see if I can make this idea work for me :)

    – physicist
    Jan 3 at 10:54











  • @physicist: Since there are no other answers yet, consider to accept my answer, please

    – Christian Hupfer
    Jan 11 at 15:49















12














Here is a 'stupid' idea:



Write two separate docs and include them as 1st part with regular order and the second one with the pages in reversed order and rotated.



Alternatively: Write one doc and choose the page range explicitly, which should go for the first part and as well for the 2nd (reversed) part.



The easiest way is includepdffrom pdfpages package -- but this will lose the cross-referencing and hyperlinks, but the later are for a printed document not really useful. ToC etc. is little bit difficult, but should be possible.



documentclassbook

usepackagepdfpages

titleHow to annoy people
authorA.U Thor
date2063/4/5

begindocument

includepdf[pages=-]dummydoc1.pdf

includepdf[pages=last-1,angle=-180]dummydoc2.pdf

enddocument


Here is dummydoc1.tex (and dummydoc2.tex is pretty much the same.)



documentclassarticle

usepackageblindtext

pagestyleempty
begindocument
sectionBeginning jobname
blindtext[50]
enddocument


enter image description hereenter image description here






share|improve this answer

























  • Great, thanks! Let me see if I can make this idea work for me :)

    – physicist
    Jan 3 at 10:54











  • @physicist: Since there are no other answers yet, consider to accept my answer, please

    – Christian Hupfer
    Jan 11 at 15:49













12












12








12







Here is a 'stupid' idea:



Write two separate docs and include them as 1st part with regular order and the second one with the pages in reversed order and rotated.



Alternatively: Write one doc and choose the page range explicitly, which should go for the first part and as well for the 2nd (reversed) part.



The easiest way is includepdffrom pdfpages package -- but this will lose the cross-referencing and hyperlinks, but the later are for a printed document not really useful. ToC etc. is little bit difficult, but should be possible.



documentclassbook

usepackagepdfpages

titleHow to annoy people
authorA.U Thor
date2063/4/5

begindocument

includepdf[pages=-]dummydoc1.pdf

includepdf[pages=last-1,angle=-180]dummydoc2.pdf

enddocument


Here is dummydoc1.tex (and dummydoc2.tex is pretty much the same.)



documentclassarticle

usepackageblindtext

pagestyleempty
begindocument
sectionBeginning jobname
blindtext[50]
enddocument


enter image description hereenter image description here






share|improve this answer















Here is a 'stupid' idea:



Write two separate docs and include them as 1st part with regular order and the second one with the pages in reversed order and rotated.



Alternatively: Write one doc and choose the page range explicitly, which should go for the first part and as well for the 2nd (reversed) part.



The easiest way is includepdffrom pdfpages package -- but this will lose the cross-referencing and hyperlinks, but the later are for a printed document not really useful. ToC etc. is little bit difficult, but should be possible.



documentclassbook

usepackagepdfpages

titleHow to annoy people
authorA.U Thor
date2063/4/5

begindocument

includepdf[pages=-]dummydoc1.pdf

includepdf[pages=last-1,angle=-180]dummydoc2.pdf

enddocument


Here is dummydoc1.tex (and dummydoc2.tex is pretty much the same.)



documentclassarticle

usepackageblindtext

pagestyleempty
begindocument
sectionBeginning jobname
blindtext[50]
enddocument


enter image description hereenter image description here







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Jan 2 at 17:17

























answered Jan 2 at 16:51









Christian HupferChristian Hupfer

149k14194390




149k14194390












  • Great, thanks! Let me see if I can make this idea work for me :)

    – physicist
    Jan 3 at 10:54











  • @physicist: Since there are no other answers yet, consider to accept my answer, please

    – Christian Hupfer
    Jan 11 at 15:49

















  • Great, thanks! Let me see if I can make this idea work for me :)

    – physicist
    Jan 3 at 10:54











  • @physicist: Since there are no other answers yet, consider to accept my answer, please

    – Christian Hupfer
    Jan 11 at 15:49
















Great, thanks! Let me see if I can make this idea work for me :)

– physicist
Jan 3 at 10:54





Great, thanks! Let me see if I can make this idea work for me :)

– physicist
Jan 3 at 10:54













@physicist: Since there are no other answers yet, consider to accept my answer, please

– Christian Hupfer
Jan 11 at 15:49





@physicist: Since there are no other answers yet, consider to accept my answer, please

– Christian Hupfer
Jan 11 at 15:49

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f468279%2fhow-to-make-a-thesis-that-can-be-read-from-both-sides%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown






Popular posts from this blog

How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

Bahrain

Postfix configuration issue with fips on centos 7; mailgun relay