USB g_serial bug? - loosing data in one direction

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
2
down vote

favorite












I am having some difficulties with kernel module Gadget Serial v2.4. g_serial is used on ARM machine BeagleBone Black with Arch Linux 4.6.3-1 which is communicating with host PC.



The problem was reproduced on these hosts:



  • Linux 4.2.0-23, PC x86_64,

  • Linux 3.4.43, Cubieboard2 armv7l,

  • Windows 10, PC x86_64,

and with different software:




  • Device (BeagleBone Black):



    • C++ and termios,

    • python3-pyserial.



  • Host (PC or Cubieboard2):



    • C# + .NET,

    • python3-pyserial.


Python test: https://github.com/tomasxvavra/serial_test.



The issue is that data is lost in direction device -> host. For example if device sends to ttyGS0 100 MB of data, then the host receives from ttyACM0 only 99.7 % of the data. This never happens in direction host -> device.



Amount of data which is lost is varying based on these conditions:




  • Size of data "packets" written to serial port:
    *If 100 MB is written to port at once through s.write(data) than it is much less likely to fail. Writing to port at various packet sizes results in variour error rates. For example:

    • Smaller packets <=512 B - mostly ok, sometimes fails with around 10-512 B mising.

    • Bigger packets 4096 - 32768 B: Fails more often and larger amounts of data is missing.



  • Speed of the host device - Fail rate was much higher on slower Cubieboard2 than on PC, especially with bigger packets.

Sometime it fails when sending only 1024 B, or similar sized number, usually 512 B is lost. I also tried to analyze USB packets with wireshark and there really was missing packets. But nothing else I could interpret as a anomaly.



So from my kernel point of view, it looks like some timing issue to me. Any similar experiences with g_serial? Thank you.



Edit



I found out that when the host is Cubieboard2 (2 CPUs), then the failure rate rapidly drops if I load the one cpu with



cat /dev/zero > /dev/null


But different amount of load can make it even worse. Still looking as some timing issue :/










share|improve this question



























    up vote
    2
    down vote

    favorite












    I am having some difficulties with kernel module Gadget Serial v2.4. g_serial is used on ARM machine BeagleBone Black with Arch Linux 4.6.3-1 which is communicating with host PC.



    The problem was reproduced on these hosts:



    • Linux 4.2.0-23, PC x86_64,

    • Linux 3.4.43, Cubieboard2 armv7l,

    • Windows 10, PC x86_64,

    and with different software:




    • Device (BeagleBone Black):



      • C++ and termios,

      • python3-pyserial.



    • Host (PC or Cubieboard2):



      • C# + .NET,

      • python3-pyserial.


    Python test: https://github.com/tomasxvavra/serial_test.



    The issue is that data is lost in direction device -> host. For example if device sends to ttyGS0 100 MB of data, then the host receives from ttyACM0 only 99.7 % of the data. This never happens in direction host -> device.



    Amount of data which is lost is varying based on these conditions:




    • Size of data "packets" written to serial port:
      *If 100 MB is written to port at once through s.write(data) than it is much less likely to fail. Writing to port at various packet sizes results in variour error rates. For example:

      • Smaller packets <=512 B - mostly ok, sometimes fails with around 10-512 B mising.

      • Bigger packets 4096 - 32768 B: Fails more often and larger amounts of data is missing.



    • Speed of the host device - Fail rate was much higher on slower Cubieboard2 than on PC, especially with bigger packets.

    Sometime it fails when sending only 1024 B, or similar sized number, usually 512 B is lost. I also tried to analyze USB packets with wireshark and there really was missing packets. But nothing else I could interpret as a anomaly.



    So from my kernel point of view, it looks like some timing issue to me. Any similar experiences with g_serial? Thank you.



    Edit



    I found out that when the host is Cubieboard2 (2 CPUs), then the failure rate rapidly drops if I load the one cpu with



    cat /dev/zero > /dev/null


    But different amount of load can make it even worse. Still looking as some timing issue :/










    share|improve this question

























      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite











      I am having some difficulties with kernel module Gadget Serial v2.4. g_serial is used on ARM machine BeagleBone Black with Arch Linux 4.6.3-1 which is communicating with host PC.



      The problem was reproduced on these hosts:



      • Linux 4.2.0-23, PC x86_64,

      • Linux 3.4.43, Cubieboard2 armv7l,

      • Windows 10, PC x86_64,

      and with different software:




      • Device (BeagleBone Black):



        • C++ and termios,

        • python3-pyserial.



      • Host (PC or Cubieboard2):



        • C# + .NET,

        • python3-pyserial.


      Python test: https://github.com/tomasxvavra/serial_test.



      The issue is that data is lost in direction device -> host. For example if device sends to ttyGS0 100 MB of data, then the host receives from ttyACM0 only 99.7 % of the data. This never happens in direction host -> device.



      Amount of data which is lost is varying based on these conditions:




      • Size of data "packets" written to serial port:
        *If 100 MB is written to port at once through s.write(data) than it is much less likely to fail. Writing to port at various packet sizes results in variour error rates. For example:

        • Smaller packets <=512 B - mostly ok, sometimes fails with around 10-512 B mising.

        • Bigger packets 4096 - 32768 B: Fails more often and larger amounts of data is missing.



      • Speed of the host device - Fail rate was much higher on slower Cubieboard2 than on PC, especially with bigger packets.

      Sometime it fails when sending only 1024 B, or similar sized number, usually 512 B is lost. I also tried to analyze USB packets with wireshark and there really was missing packets. But nothing else I could interpret as a anomaly.



      So from my kernel point of view, it looks like some timing issue to me. Any similar experiences with g_serial? Thank you.



      Edit



      I found out that when the host is Cubieboard2 (2 CPUs), then the failure rate rapidly drops if I load the one cpu with



      cat /dev/zero > /dev/null


      But different amount of load can make it even worse. Still looking as some timing issue :/










      share|improve this question















      I am having some difficulties with kernel module Gadget Serial v2.4. g_serial is used on ARM machine BeagleBone Black with Arch Linux 4.6.3-1 which is communicating with host PC.



      The problem was reproduced on these hosts:



      • Linux 4.2.0-23, PC x86_64,

      • Linux 3.4.43, Cubieboard2 armv7l,

      • Windows 10, PC x86_64,

      and with different software:




      • Device (BeagleBone Black):



        • C++ and termios,

        • python3-pyserial.



      • Host (PC or Cubieboard2):



        • C# + .NET,

        • python3-pyserial.


      Python test: https://github.com/tomasxvavra/serial_test.



      The issue is that data is lost in direction device -> host. For example if device sends to ttyGS0 100 MB of data, then the host receives from ttyACM0 only 99.7 % of the data. This never happens in direction host -> device.



      Amount of data which is lost is varying based on these conditions:




      • Size of data "packets" written to serial port:
        *If 100 MB is written to port at once through s.write(data) than it is much less likely to fail. Writing to port at various packet sizes results in variour error rates. For example:

        • Smaller packets <=512 B - mostly ok, sometimes fails with around 10-512 B mising.

        • Bigger packets 4096 - 32768 B: Fails more often and larger amounts of data is missing.



      • Speed of the host device - Fail rate was much higher on slower Cubieboard2 than on PC, especially with bigger packets.

      Sometime it fails when sending only 1024 B, or similar sized number, usually 512 B is lost. I also tried to analyze USB packets with wireshark and there really was missing packets. But nothing else I could interpret as a anomaly.



      So from my kernel point of view, it looks like some timing issue to me. Any similar experiences with g_serial? Thank you.



      Edit



      I found out that when the host is Cubieboard2 (2 CPUs), then the failure rate rapidly drops if I load the one cpu with



      cat /dev/zero > /dev/null


      But different amount of load can make it even worse. Still looking as some timing issue :/







      kernel bugs






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Dec 7 at 23:50









      Rui F Ribeiro

      38.7k1479128




      38.7k1479128










      asked Jul 4 '16 at 10:21









      GeraltCZ

      112




      112

























          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "106"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f293747%2fusb-g-serial-bug-loosing-data-in-one-direction%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown






























          active

          oldest

          votes













          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f293747%2fusb-g-serial-bug-loosing-data-in-one-direction%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown






          Popular posts from this blog

          How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

          Displaying single band from multi-band raster using QGIS

          How many registers does an x86_64 CPU actually have?