Buffering issue when looking at netcat output
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I have problem I am trying to understand:
I am sending some UDP data to local host. It is a simple UDP packet with a counter. It counts up to 16 (0xF) and stops. When I grep the received data on the output, and grep only shows up to packet 11 (0xB) received. All the packets are actually received, but either grep or xxd is buffering. I have sent the data to a file to check if all is received, and the data is coming through.
[testuser %] netcat -l 127.0.0.1 -u -p 8777 | xxd -e -u | grep DEAD
00000000: 00000000 DEADBEEF FFFFFFFF DEADBEEF ................
00000400: 00000001 DEADBEEF FFFFFFFF DEADBEEF ................
00000800: 00000002 DEADBEEF FFFFFFFF DEADBEEF ................
00000c00: 00000003 DEADBEEF FFFFFFFF DEADBEEF ................
00001000: 00000004 DEADBEEF FFFFFFFF DEADBEEF ................
00001400: 00000005 DEADBEEF FFFFFFFF DEADBEEF ................
00001800: 00000006 DEADBEEF FFFFFFFF DEADBEEF ................
00001c00: 00000007 DEADBEEF FFFFFFFF DEADBEEF ................
00002000: 00000008 DEADBEEF FFFFFFFF DEADBEEF ................
00002400: 00000009 DEADBEEF FFFFFFFF DEADBEEF ................
00002800: 0000000A DEADBEEF FFFFFFFF DEADBEEF ................
00002c00: 0000000B DEADBEEF FFFFFFFF DEADBEEF ................
I suspect this is a buffering problem ... I used od (Octal dump) and I could see the full sequence, but I like the xxd output better and would like it to work.
grep pipe netcat buffer xxd
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I have problem I am trying to understand:
I am sending some UDP data to local host. It is a simple UDP packet with a counter. It counts up to 16 (0xF) and stops. When I grep the received data on the output, and grep only shows up to packet 11 (0xB) received. All the packets are actually received, but either grep or xxd is buffering. I have sent the data to a file to check if all is received, and the data is coming through.
[testuser %] netcat -l 127.0.0.1 -u -p 8777 | xxd -e -u | grep DEAD
00000000: 00000000 DEADBEEF FFFFFFFF DEADBEEF ................
00000400: 00000001 DEADBEEF FFFFFFFF DEADBEEF ................
00000800: 00000002 DEADBEEF FFFFFFFF DEADBEEF ................
00000c00: 00000003 DEADBEEF FFFFFFFF DEADBEEF ................
00001000: 00000004 DEADBEEF FFFFFFFF DEADBEEF ................
00001400: 00000005 DEADBEEF FFFFFFFF DEADBEEF ................
00001800: 00000006 DEADBEEF FFFFFFFF DEADBEEF ................
00001c00: 00000007 DEADBEEF FFFFFFFF DEADBEEF ................
00002000: 00000008 DEADBEEF FFFFFFFF DEADBEEF ................
00002400: 00000009 DEADBEEF FFFFFFFF DEADBEEF ................
00002800: 0000000A DEADBEEF FFFFFFFF DEADBEEF ................
00002c00: 0000000B DEADBEEF FFFFFFFF DEADBEEF ................
I suspect this is a buffering problem ... I used od (Octal dump) and I could see the full sequence, but I like the xxd output better and would like it to work.
grep pipe netcat buffer xxd
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I have problem I am trying to understand:
I am sending some UDP data to local host. It is a simple UDP packet with a counter. It counts up to 16 (0xF) and stops. When I grep the received data on the output, and grep only shows up to packet 11 (0xB) received. All the packets are actually received, but either grep or xxd is buffering. I have sent the data to a file to check if all is received, and the data is coming through.
[testuser %] netcat -l 127.0.0.1 -u -p 8777 | xxd -e -u | grep DEAD
00000000: 00000000 DEADBEEF FFFFFFFF DEADBEEF ................
00000400: 00000001 DEADBEEF FFFFFFFF DEADBEEF ................
00000800: 00000002 DEADBEEF FFFFFFFF DEADBEEF ................
00000c00: 00000003 DEADBEEF FFFFFFFF DEADBEEF ................
00001000: 00000004 DEADBEEF FFFFFFFF DEADBEEF ................
00001400: 00000005 DEADBEEF FFFFFFFF DEADBEEF ................
00001800: 00000006 DEADBEEF FFFFFFFF DEADBEEF ................
00001c00: 00000007 DEADBEEF FFFFFFFF DEADBEEF ................
00002000: 00000008 DEADBEEF FFFFFFFF DEADBEEF ................
00002400: 00000009 DEADBEEF FFFFFFFF DEADBEEF ................
00002800: 0000000A DEADBEEF FFFFFFFF DEADBEEF ................
00002c00: 0000000B DEADBEEF FFFFFFFF DEADBEEF ................
I suspect this is a buffering problem ... I used od (Octal dump) and I could see the full sequence, but I like the xxd output better and would like it to work.
grep pipe netcat buffer xxd
I have problem I am trying to understand:
I am sending some UDP data to local host. It is a simple UDP packet with a counter. It counts up to 16 (0xF) and stops. When I grep the received data on the output, and grep only shows up to packet 11 (0xB) received. All the packets are actually received, but either grep or xxd is buffering. I have sent the data to a file to check if all is received, and the data is coming through.
[testuser %] netcat -l 127.0.0.1 -u -p 8777 | xxd -e -u | grep DEAD
00000000: 00000000 DEADBEEF FFFFFFFF DEADBEEF ................
00000400: 00000001 DEADBEEF FFFFFFFF DEADBEEF ................
00000800: 00000002 DEADBEEF FFFFFFFF DEADBEEF ................
00000c00: 00000003 DEADBEEF FFFFFFFF DEADBEEF ................
00001000: 00000004 DEADBEEF FFFFFFFF DEADBEEF ................
00001400: 00000005 DEADBEEF FFFFFFFF DEADBEEF ................
00001800: 00000006 DEADBEEF FFFFFFFF DEADBEEF ................
00001c00: 00000007 DEADBEEF FFFFFFFF DEADBEEF ................
00002000: 00000008 DEADBEEF FFFFFFFF DEADBEEF ................
00002400: 00000009 DEADBEEF FFFFFFFF DEADBEEF ................
00002800: 0000000A DEADBEEF FFFFFFFF DEADBEEF ................
00002c00: 0000000B DEADBEEF FFFFFFFF DEADBEEF ................
I suspect this is a buffering problem ... I used od (Octal dump) and I could see the full sequence, but I like the xxd output better and would like it to work.
grep pipe netcat buffer xxd
grep pipe netcat buffer xxd
edited Dec 8 at 3:49
Jeff Schaller
38k1053123
38k1053123
asked Dec 8 at 3:21
Xofo
2331313
2331313
add a comment |
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f486709%2fbuffering-issue-when-looking-at-netcat-output%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f486709%2fbuffering-issue-when-looking-at-netcat-output%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown