Post-orbital constriction

Multi tool use
Multi tool use






























Post-orbital constriction for various hominids[1]
Increased constriction
Gorilla0.57

P. walkeri
(KNM-WT 17000)
0.57

P. boisei
(KNM-ER 406)
0.57
Intermediate

Dryopithecus
(RUD 77)
0.73

Sahelanthropus
(TM 266-01-060-1)
0.59
Australopithecus0.66
P. robustus0.70

Homo habilis
(OH 24, KNM-ER 1813)
0.72
K. rudolfensis0.70
H. ergaster0.75
Pongo0.66
Pan0.70
Reduced constriction
Praeanthropus0.80
Absolutely reduced constriction
Homo sapiens0.92

In physical anthropology, post-orbital constriction, often referred to as the post-orbital constriction index, is a narrowing of the cranium (skull) just behind the eye sockets (the orbits, hence the name), in primates — including primitive hominids. This constriction is very noticeable in non-human primates, slightly less so in Australopithecines, even less in Homo erectus and the most primitive Homo sapiens.[1] The post-orbital constriction index of archaic Homo species begins to fall within the range of modern Homo sapiens during the Mid-Pleistocene era.[2] In a departure from Homo erectus, Homo sapiens manifests a reduced post-orbital constriction due to increase in cranial capacity (about 1,350 cc), accompanied by higher cranial vaults. It completely disappears in modern Homo sapiens.[3] Thus, it is a useful, quantifiable measure of how far along the evolutionary path a hominid fossil might be placed.


In species such as baboons and African great apes, an increase in the available capacity of the infratemporal fossa is simultaneously accompanied by a constriction in the sagittal plane.[4] As such, the anterior and posterior portions of the anterior temporalis muscle are inversely correlated in size, with the anterior being larger.[4] Although the temporalis muscle is used for chewing, there is no evidence that the supraorbital structure of primates is dependent upon their respective chewing habits or dietary preferences.[5]


Post-orbital constriction is defined by either a ratio of minimum frontal breadth (MFB) behind the supraorbital torus divided by maximum upper facial breadth (bifrontomalare temporale, BFM) or as the maximum width behind the orbit of the skull.[1][6][7]



See also


  • Alveolar prognathism

  • Craniometry


Notes




  1. ^ abc Cameron 2004, pp 304-305


  2. ^ Rightmire, G. Philip (2008-02-22). "Homo in the middle pleistocene: Hypodigms, variation, and species recognition". Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews. 17 (1): 8–21. doi:10.1002/evan.20160. ISSN 1060-1538..mw-parser-output cite.citationfont-style:inherit.mw-parser-output qquotes:"""""""'""'".mw-parser-output code.cs1-codecolor:inherit;background:inherit;border:inherit;padding:inherit.mw-parser-output .cs1-lock-free abackground:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/65/Lock-green.svg/9px-Lock-green.svg.png")no-repeat;background-position:right .1em center.mw-parser-output .cs1-lock-limited a,.mw-parser-output .cs1-lock-registration abackground:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/d6/Lock-gray-alt-2.svg/9px-Lock-gray-alt-2.svg.png")no-repeat;background-position:right .1em center.mw-parser-output .cs1-lock-subscription abackground:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/aa/Lock-red-alt-2.svg/9px-Lock-red-alt-2.svg.png")no-repeat;background-position:right .1em center.mw-parser-output .cs1-subscription,.mw-parser-output .cs1-registrationcolor:#555.mw-parser-output .cs1-subscription span,.mw-parser-output .cs1-registration spanborder-bottom:1px dotted;cursor:help.mw-parser-output .cs1-hidden-errordisplay:none;font-size:100%.mw-parser-output .cs1-visible-errorfont-size:100%.mw-parser-output .cs1-subscription,.mw-parser-output .cs1-registration,.mw-parser-output .cs1-formatfont-size:95%.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-left,.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-wl-leftpadding-left:0.2em.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-right,.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-wl-rightpadding-right:0.2em


  3. ^ "Archaic Homo sapiens | Learn Science at Scitable". www.nature.com. Retrieved 2018-08-09.


  4. ^ ab KUBO, DAISUKE; KONO, REIKO T.; SUWA, GEN (2012). "Endocranial proportions and postorbital morphology of the Minatogawa I and IV Late Pleistocene Homo sapiens crania from Okinawa Island, Japan". Anthropological Science. 120 (2): 179–194. doi:10.1537/ase.110804. ISSN 0918-7960.


  5. ^ Picq, Pascal (1994). "Craniofacial size and proportions and the functional significance of the supraorbital region in primates". Zeitschrift für Morphologie und Anthropologie. 80 (1): 51–63.


  6. ^ Kimbel, William H.; White, Tim D.; Johanson, Donald C. (1984-08). "Cranial morphology ofAustralopithecus afarensis: A comparative study based on a composite reconstruction of the adult skull". American Journal of Physical Anthropology (in French). 64 (4): 337–388. doi:10.1002/ajpa.1330640403. ISSN 0002-9483. Check date values in: |date= (help)


  7. ^ Monson, Tesla; F. Brasil, Marianne; J. Stratford, Dominic; Hlusko, Leslea (2017-02-14). "Patterns of craniofacial variation and taxonomic diversity in the South African Cercopithecidae fossil record". Palaeontologia Electronica. 20.1.7A: 1–20. doi:10.26879/690.




References



  • Cameron, David W.; Groves, Colin P. (2004). Bones, stones, and molecules: "out of Africa" and human origins. Academic Press. ISBN 0-12-156933-0.








q,FCTJBbd6t Kk hYeivDCX0,UWrob90EH0n,SUySopOp,VFZfNgcB L,cOtWMQKy iYWS26LOKVo mFUVV k4c3,nzk9rJbh6IZ
d79RO W9powU9vkv1cq VCez,rdjOraA EyfzQrfEE7U

Popular posts from this blog

How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

How many registers does an x86_64 CPU actually have?

Displaying single band from multi-band raster using QGIS