If the square of every element of a ring is in the center, must the ring be commutative?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
8
down vote
favorite
Let $R$ be a ring with identity such that the square of any element belongs to the center of $R$. Is it necessary true that $R$ is commutative?
(I can show that for any $x,yin R$, $2(xy-yx) =0 $ but I cannot prove commutativity of $R$.)
abstract-algebra ring-theory
add a comment |
up vote
8
down vote
favorite
Let $R$ be a ring with identity such that the square of any element belongs to the center of $R$. Is it necessary true that $R$ is commutative?
(I can show that for any $x,yin R$, $2(xy-yx) =0 $ but I cannot prove commutativity of $R$.)
abstract-algebra ring-theory
add a comment |
up vote
8
down vote
favorite
up vote
8
down vote
favorite
Let $R$ be a ring with identity such that the square of any element belongs to the center of $R$. Is it necessary true that $R$ is commutative?
(I can show that for any $x,yin R$, $2(xy-yx) =0 $ but I cannot prove commutativity of $R$.)
abstract-algebra ring-theory
Let $R$ be a ring with identity such that the square of any element belongs to the center of $R$. Is it necessary true that $R$ is commutative?
(I can show that for any $x,yin R$, $2(xy-yx) =0 $ but I cannot prove commutativity of $R$.)
abstract-algebra ring-theory
abstract-algebra ring-theory
edited Dec 8 at 7:36
Eric Wofsey
178k12202328
178k12202328
asked Dec 8 at 7:15
Sara.T
1449
1449
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
7
down vote
accepted
Here's a counterexample. Consider the $mathbbF_2$-algebra $R$ generated by two elements $x,y$ modulo relations that $x^2=y^2=0$ and every word of length $3$ formed by $x$ and $y$ is $0$. Explicitly, $R$ has $1,x,y,xy,yx$ as a basis and any product of basis elements that would give a word not in this set is $0$. Since $xyneq yx$, $R$ is not commutative.
I now claim that the square of every element of $R$ is central. Indeed, for an element $r=a+bx+cy+dxy+eyxin R$ ($a,b,c,d,einmathbbF_2$) we have
$$r^2 = a^2 + bcxy + bcyx.$$ To show that such an element is central, it suffices to show that $xy+yx$ is central. But this is trivial, since $xy+yx$ annihilates both $x$ and $y$ on both sides.
Since you are giving a specific example, I'm assuming that the answer is no, it doesn't have to be commutative?
– Ovi
Dec 8 at 7:34
Ok just got that it's not commutative from your edit, was confused on that before lol since I thought it was commutative.
– Ovi
Dec 8 at 7:36
Thanks, Out of curiosity, is there a matrix representation for your algebra ? I mean an explicit matrix ring example.
– Sara.T
Dec 8 at 7:45
1
@Sara.T: Well, you can just let it act on itself by left multiplication to get a representation by $5times 5$ matrices. If you further mod out $yx$ there is a nice representation by $3times 3$ matrices though, with $x$ being $beginpmatrix 0 & 1 & 0 \ 0 & 0 & 0 \ 0 & 0 & 0endpmatrix$ and $y$ being $beginpmatrix 0 & 0 & 0 \ 0 & 0 & 1 \ 0 & 0 & 0endpmatrix$. They generate the ring of upper-triangular $3times 3$ matrices with constant diagonal.
– Eric Wofsey
Dec 8 at 8:11
@EricWofsey thanks, I like that.
– Sara.T
Dec 8 at 8:24
|
show 2 more comments
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3030793%2fif-the-square-of-every-element-of-a-ring-is-in-the-center-must-the-ring-be-comm%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
7
down vote
accepted
Here's a counterexample. Consider the $mathbbF_2$-algebra $R$ generated by two elements $x,y$ modulo relations that $x^2=y^2=0$ and every word of length $3$ formed by $x$ and $y$ is $0$. Explicitly, $R$ has $1,x,y,xy,yx$ as a basis and any product of basis elements that would give a word not in this set is $0$. Since $xyneq yx$, $R$ is not commutative.
I now claim that the square of every element of $R$ is central. Indeed, for an element $r=a+bx+cy+dxy+eyxin R$ ($a,b,c,d,einmathbbF_2$) we have
$$r^2 = a^2 + bcxy + bcyx.$$ To show that such an element is central, it suffices to show that $xy+yx$ is central. But this is trivial, since $xy+yx$ annihilates both $x$ and $y$ on both sides.
Since you are giving a specific example, I'm assuming that the answer is no, it doesn't have to be commutative?
– Ovi
Dec 8 at 7:34
Ok just got that it's not commutative from your edit, was confused on that before lol since I thought it was commutative.
– Ovi
Dec 8 at 7:36
Thanks, Out of curiosity, is there a matrix representation for your algebra ? I mean an explicit matrix ring example.
– Sara.T
Dec 8 at 7:45
1
@Sara.T: Well, you can just let it act on itself by left multiplication to get a representation by $5times 5$ matrices. If you further mod out $yx$ there is a nice representation by $3times 3$ matrices though, with $x$ being $beginpmatrix 0 & 1 & 0 \ 0 & 0 & 0 \ 0 & 0 & 0endpmatrix$ and $y$ being $beginpmatrix 0 & 0 & 0 \ 0 & 0 & 1 \ 0 & 0 & 0endpmatrix$. They generate the ring of upper-triangular $3times 3$ matrices with constant diagonal.
– Eric Wofsey
Dec 8 at 8:11
@EricWofsey thanks, I like that.
– Sara.T
Dec 8 at 8:24
|
show 2 more comments
up vote
7
down vote
accepted
Here's a counterexample. Consider the $mathbbF_2$-algebra $R$ generated by two elements $x,y$ modulo relations that $x^2=y^2=0$ and every word of length $3$ formed by $x$ and $y$ is $0$. Explicitly, $R$ has $1,x,y,xy,yx$ as a basis and any product of basis elements that would give a word not in this set is $0$. Since $xyneq yx$, $R$ is not commutative.
I now claim that the square of every element of $R$ is central. Indeed, for an element $r=a+bx+cy+dxy+eyxin R$ ($a,b,c,d,einmathbbF_2$) we have
$$r^2 = a^2 + bcxy + bcyx.$$ To show that such an element is central, it suffices to show that $xy+yx$ is central. But this is trivial, since $xy+yx$ annihilates both $x$ and $y$ on both sides.
Since you are giving a specific example, I'm assuming that the answer is no, it doesn't have to be commutative?
– Ovi
Dec 8 at 7:34
Ok just got that it's not commutative from your edit, was confused on that before lol since I thought it was commutative.
– Ovi
Dec 8 at 7:36
Thanks, Out of curiosity, is there a matrix representation for your algebra ? I mean an explicit matrix ring example.
– Sara.T
Dec 8 at 7:45
1
@Sara.T: Well, you can just let it act on itself by left multiplication to get a representation by $5times 5$ matrices. If you further mod out $yx$ there is a nice representation by $3times 3$ matrices though, with $x$ being $beginpmatrix 0 & 1 & 0 \ 0 & 0 & 0 \ 0 & 0 & 0endpmatrix$ and $y$ being $beginpmatrix 0 & 0 & 0 \ 0 & 0 & 1 \ 0 & 0 & 0endpmatrix$. They generate the ring of upper-triangular $3times 3$ matrices with constant diagonal.
– Eric Wofsey
Dec 8 at 8:11
@EricWofsey thanks, I like that.
– Sara.T
Dec 8 at 8:24
|
show 2 more comments
up vote
7
down vote
accepted
up vote
7
down vote
accepted
Here's a counterexample. Consider the $mathbbF_2$-algebra $R$ generated by two elements $x,y$ modulo relations that $x^2=y^2=0$ and every word of length $3$ formed by $x$ and $y$ is $0$. Explicitly, $R$ has $1,x,y,xy,yx$ as a basis and any product of basis elements that would give a word not in this set is $0$. Since $xyneq yx$, $R$ is not commutative.
I now claim that the square of every element of $R$ is central. Indeed, for an element $r=a+bx+cy+dxy+eyxin R$ ($a,b,c,d,einmathbbF_2$) we have
$$r^2 = a^2 + bcxy + bcyx.$$ To show that such an element is central, it suffices to show that $xy+yx$ is central. But this is trivial, since $xy+yx$ annihilates both $x$ and $y$ on both sides.
Here's a counterexample. Consider the $mathbbF_2$-algebra $R$ generated by two elements $x,y$ modulo relations that $x^2=y^2=0$ and every word of length $3$ formed by $x$ and $y$ is $0$. Explicitly, $R$ has $1,x,y,xy,yx$ as a basis and any product of basis elements that would give a word not in this set is $0$. Since $xyneq yx$, $R$ is not commutative.
I now claim that the square of every element of $R$ is central. Indeed, for an element $r=a+bx+cy+dxy+eyxin R$ ($a,b,c,d,einmathbbF_2$) we have
$$r^2 = a^2 + bcxy + bcyx.$$ To show that such an element is central, it suffices to show that $xy+yx$ is central. But this is trivial, since $xy+yx$ annihilates both $x$ and $y$ on both sides.
edited Dec 8 at 7:35
answered Dec 8 at 7:29
Eric Wofsey
178k12202328
178k12202328
Since you are giving a specific example, I'm assuming that the answer is no, it doesn't have to be commutative?
– Ovi
Dec 8 at 7:34
Ok just got that it's not commutative from your edit, was confused on that before lol since I thought it was commutative.
– Ovi
Dec 8 at 7:36
Thanks, Out of curiosity, is there a matrix representation for your algebra ? I mean an explicit matrix ring example.
– Sara.T
Dec 8 at 7:45
1
@Sara.T: Well, you can just let it act on itself by left multiplication to get a representation by $5times 5$ matrices. If you further mod out $yx$ there is a nice representation by $3times 3$ matrices though, with $x$ being $beginpmatrix 0 & 1 & 0 \ 0 & 0 & 0 \ 0 & 0 & 0endpmatrix$ and $y$ being $beginpmatrix 0 & 0 & 0 \ 0 & 0 & 1 \ 0 & 0 & 0endpmatrix$. They generate the ring of upper-triangular $3times 3$ matrices with constant diagonal.
– Eric Wofsey
Dec 8 at 8:11
@EricWofsey thanks, I like that.
– Sara.T
Dec 8 at 8:24
|
show 2 more comments
Since you are giving a specific example, I'm assuming that the answer is no, it doesn't have to be commutative?
– Ovi
Dec 8 at 7:34
Ok just got that it's not commutative from your edit, was confused on that before lol since I thought it was commutative.
– Ovi
Dec 8 at 7:36
Thanks, Out of curiosity, is there a matrix representation for your algebra ? I mean an explicit matrix ring example.
– Sara.T
Dec 8 at 7:45
1
@Sara.T: Well, you can just let it act on itself by left multiplication to get a representation by $5times 5$ matrices. If you further mod out $yx$ there is a nice representation by $3times 3$ matrices though, with $x$ being $beginpmatrix 0 & 1 & 0 \ 0 & 0 & 0 \ 0 & 0 & 0endpmatrix$ and $y$ being $beginpmatrix 0 & 0 & 0 \ 0 & 0 & 1 \ 0 & 0 & 0endpmatrix$. They generate the ring of upper-triangular $3times 3$ matrices with constant diagonal.
– Eric Wofsey
Dec 8 at 8:11
@EricWofsey thanks, I like that.
– Sara.T
Dec 8 at 8:24
Since you are giving a specific example, I'm assuming that the answer is no, it doesn't have to be commutative?
– Ovi
Dec 8 at 7:34
Since you are giving a specific example, I'm assuming that the answer is no, it doesn't have to be commutative?
– Ovi
Dec 8 at 7:34
Ok just got that it's not commutative from your edit, was confused on that before lol since I thought it was commutative.
– Ovi
Dec 8 at 7:36
Ok just got that it's not commutative from your edit, was confused on that before lol since I thought it was commutative.
– Ovi
Dec 8 at 7:36
Thanks, Out of curiosity, is there a matrix representation for your algebra ? I mean an explicit matrix ring example.
– Sara.T
Dec 8 at 7:45
Thanks, Out of curiosity, is there a matrix representation for your algebra ? I mean an explicit matrix ring example.
– Sara.T
Dec 8 at 7:45
1
1
@Sara.T: Well, you can just let it act on itself by left multiplication to get a representation by $5times 5$ matrices. If you further mod out $yx$ there is a nice representation by $3times 3$ matrices though, with $x$ being $beginpmatrix 0 & 1 & 0 \ 0 & 0 & 0 \ 0 & 0 & 0endpmatrix$ and $y$ being $beginpmatrix 0 & 0 & 0 \ 0 & 0 & 1 \ 0 & 0 & 0endpmatrix$. They generate the ring of upper-triangular $3times 3$ matrices with constant diagonal.
– Eric Wofsey
Dec 8 at 8:11
@Sara.T: Well, you can just let it act on itself by left multiplication to get a representation by $5times 5$ matrices. If you further mod out $yx$ there is a nice representation by $3times 3$ matrices though, with $x$ being $beginpmatrix 0 & 1 & 0 \ 0 & 0 & 0 \ 0 & 0 & 0endpmatrix$ and $y$ being $beginpmatrix 0 & 0 & 0 \ 0 & 0 & 1 \ 0 & 0 & 0endpmatrix$. They generate the ring of upper-triangular $3times 3$ matrices with constant diagonal.
– Eric Wofsey
Dec 8 at 8:11
@EricWofsey thanks, I like that.
– Sara.T
Dec 8 at 8:24
@EricWofsey thanks, I like that.
– Sara.T
Dec 8 at 8:24
|
show 2 more comments
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3030793%2fif-the-square-of-every-element-of-a-ring-is-in-the-center-must-the-ring-be-comm%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown