Constructing a ring with a given spectrum

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
3
down vote

favorite












A DVR necessarily has spectrum $ 0, mathfrakm $, but a DVR is also necessarily noetherian. Can we find an example of a non-noetherian (thus non DVR) ring, say $R$, with the spectrum $ 0, mathfrakm ?$



Clearly we need $R$ a domain since the zero ideal is in the spec. We also have $mathfrakm neq 0$ since then $R$ would be a field, thus noetherian but even if it didn’t follow that $mathfrakm neq 0$ I would require this so it’s interesting. Also, krull dimension is obviously 1 since we have one chain of prime ideals of height 1.



I have tried the standard non-noetherian things like starting with a polynomial ring in countably many variables and quotienting and localizing, but so far no luck. I always accidentally land on a field instead of a 2 point spectrum. I also haven’t been able to come up with a way to see this from an algebro-geometric side of things.



My commutative algebra skills are moderate, I went about halfway through Atiyah Macdonald. I’m sure someone with stronger comm alg intuition will see an easy construction?










share|cite|improve this question



























    up vote
    3
    down vote

    favorite












    A DVR necessarily has spectrum $ 0, mathfrakm $, but a DVR is also necessarily noetherian. Can we find an example of a non-noetherian (thus non DVR) ring, say $R$, with the spectrum $ 0, mathfrakm ?$



    Clearly we need $R$ a domain since the zero ideal is in the spec. We also have $mathfrakm neq 0$ since then $R$ would be a field, thus noetherian but even if it didn’t follow that $mathfrakm neq 0$ I would require this so it’s interesting. Also, krull dimension is obviously 1 since we have one chain of prime ideals of height 1.



    I have tried the standard non-noetherian things like starting with a polynomial ring in countably many variables and quotienting and localizing, but so far no luck. I always accidentally land on a field instead of a 2 point spectrum. I also haven’t been able to come up with a way to see this from an algebro-geometric side of things.



    My commutative algebra skills are moderate, I went about halfway through Atiyah Macdonald. I’m sure someone with stronger comm alg intuition will see an easy construction?










    share|cite|improve this question

























      up vote
      3
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      3
      down vote

      favorite











      A DVR necessarily has spectrum $ 0, mathfrakm $, but a DVR is also necessarily noetherian. Can we find an example of a non-noetherian (thus non DVR) ring, say $R$, with the spectrum $ 0, mathfrakm ?$



      Clearly we need $R$ a domain since the zero ideal is in the spec. We also have $mathfrakm neq 0$ since then $R$ would be a field, thus noetherian but even if it didn’t follow that $mathfrakm neq 0$ I would require this so it’s interesting. Also, krull dimension is obviously 1 since we have one chain of prime ideals of height 1.



      I have tried the standard non-noetherian things like starting with a polynomial ring in countably many variables and quotienting and localizing, but so far no luck. I always accidentally land on a field instead of a 2 point spectrum. I also haven’t been able to come up with a way to see this from an algebro-geometric side of things.



      My commutative algebra skills are moderate, I went about halfway through Atiyah Macdonald. I’m sure someone with stronger comm alg intuition will see an easy construction?










      share|cite|improve this question















      A DVR necessarily has spectrum $ 0, mathfrakm $, but a DVR is also necessarily noetherian. Can we find an example of a non-noetherian (thus non DVR) ring, say $R$, with the spectrum $ 0, mathfrakm ?$



      Clearly we need $R$ a domain since the zero ideal is in the spec. We also have $mathfrakm neq 0$ since then $R$ would be a field, thus noetherian but even if it didn’t follow that $mathfrakm neq 0$ I would require this so it’s interesting. Also, krull dimension is obviously 1 since we have one chain of prime ideals of height 1.



      I have tried the standard non-noetherian things like starting with a polynomial ring in countably many variables and quotienting and localizing, but so far no luck. I always accidentally land on a field instead of a 2 point spectrum. I also haven’t been able to come up with a way to see this from an algebro-geometric side of things.



      My commutative algebra skills are moderate, I went about halfway through Atiyah Macdonald. I’m sure someone with stronger comm alg intuition will see an easy construction?







      algebraic-geometry ring-theory commutative-algebra






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited 2 days ago

























      asked 2 days ago









      Prince M

      1,7231520




      1,7231520




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted










          To expand on Bernard's answer, let $k$ be a field and consider the ring $R = k[[x^mathbbR_ge 0]]$ of formal power series of the form $sum_r in S c_r x^r$ where $r in mathbbR_ge 0$ and $S subseteq mathbbR_ge 0$ is well-ordered (this guarantees that multiplication is well-defined). This is a valuation ring.



          For $f in R$ a nonzero power series, write $nu(f) in mathbbR_ge 0$ for the smallest exponent of a nonzero term in $f$. If $I$ is any nonzero ideal of $R$, then if some nonzero $f in I$ has valuation $nu(f)$, then multiplying by every element of $R$, and observing that nonzero every $g in R$ can be written as $x^nu(g)$ times a unit, we see that $I$ contains every element of $R$ with valuation $ge nu(f)$. So the ideals of $R$ come in two infinite families, namely



          $$I_r = f in R : nu(f) ge r , r in mathbbR_ge 0$$



          and



          $$J_r = f in R : nu(f) > r , r in mathbbR_ge 0$$



          (together with the zero ideal, which you can think of as $I_infty$). These ideals are totally ordered and in particular show that $R$ is very far from Noetherian.



          The corresponding quotients $R/I_r$ and $R/J_r$ contain nontrivial nilpotents, and hence $I_r$ and $J_r$ are not prime, except for $J_0$, which is the unique maximal ideal, and $I_0$, which is the unit ideal. So $R$ has exactly two prime ideals, $(0)$ and $J_0$, as desired.






          share|cite|improve this answer






















          • Great answer, explicit and detailed!
            – Prince M
            yesterday

















          up vote
          3
          down vote













          A non-discrete valuation ring of height $1$ is such an example.






          share|cite|improve this answer




















          • Ok give me an example verifying the existence of a non discrete valuation ring of height 1
            – Prince M
            2 days ago










          • @Prince: I construct exactly such a thing in my answer.
            – Qiaochu Yuan
            2 days ago










          • I see that! I upvoted yours and will probably accept it. I tried to comment on it and say thank you, but it said my comment was too short.
            – Prince M
            2 days ago










          • Too be honest I always avoid rings of formal power series because I never learned them so they feel uncomfortable.. I should probably get over that!
            – Prince M
            2 days ago










          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2999012%2fconstructing-a-ring-with-a-given-spectrum%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted










          To expand on Bernard's answer, let $k$ be a field and consider the ring $R = k[[x^mathbbR_ge 0]]$ of formal power series of the form $sum_r in S c_r x^r$ where $r in mathbbR_ge 0$ and $S subseteq mathbbR_ge 0$ is well-ordered (this guarantees that multiplication is well-defined). This is a valuation ring.



          For $f in R$ a nonzero power series, write $nu(f) in mathbbR_ge 0$ for the smallest exponent of a nonzero term in $f$. If $I$ is any nonzero ideal of $R$, then if some nonzero $f in I$ has valuation $nu(f)$, then multiplying by every element of $R$, and observing that nonzero every $g in R$ can be written as $x^nu(g)$ times a unit, we see that $I$ contains every element of $R$ with valuation $ge nu(f)$. So the ideals of $R$ come in two infinite families, namely



          $$I_r = f in R : nu(f) ge r , r in mathbbR_ge 0$$



          and



          $$J_r = f in R : nu(f) > r , r in mathbbR_ge 0$$



          (together with the zero ideal, which you can think of as $I_infty$). These ideals are totally ordered and in particular show that $R$ is very far from Noetherian.



          The corresponding quotients $R/I_r$ and $R/J_r$ contain nontrivial nilpotents, and hence $I_r$ and $J_r$ are not prime, except for $J_0$, which is the unique maximal ideal, and $I_0$, which is the unit ideal. So $R$ has exactly two prime ideals, $(0)$ and $J_0$, as desired.






          share|cite|improve this answer






















          • Great answer, explicit and detailed!
            – Prince M
            yesterday














          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted










          To expand on Bernard's answer, let $k$ be a field and consider the ring $R = k[[x^mathbbR_ge 0]]$ of formal power series of the form $sum_r in S c_r x^r$ where $r in mathbbR_ge 0$ and $S subseteq mathbbR_ge 0$ is well-ordered (this guarantees that multiplication is well-defined). This is a valuation ring.



          For $f in R$ a nonzero power series, write $nu(f) in mathbbR_ge 0$ for the smallest exponent of a nonzero term in $f$. If $I$ is any nonzero ideal of $R$, then if some nonzero $f in I$ has valuation $nu(f)$, then multiplying by every element of $R$, and observing that nonzero every $g in R$ can be written as $x^nu(g)$ times a unit, we see that $I$ contains every element of $R$ with valuation $ge nu(f)$. So the ideals of $R$ come in two infinite families, namely



          $$I_r = f in R : nu(f) ge r , r in mathbbR_ge 0$$



          and



          $$J_r = f in R : nu(f) > r , r in mathbbR_ge 0$$



          (together with the zero ideal, which you can think of as $I_infty$). These ideals are totally ordered and in particular show that $R$ is very far from Noetherian.



          The corresponding quotients $R/I_r$ and $R/J_r$ contain nontrivial nilpotents, and hence $I_r$ and $J_r$ are not prime, except for $J_0$, which is the unique maximal ideal, and $I_0$, which is the unit ideal. So $R$ has exactly two prime ideals, $(0)$ and $J_0$, as desired.






          share|cite|improve this answer






















          • Great answer, explicit and detailed!
            – Prince M
            yesterday












          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted






          To expand on Bernard's answer, let $k$ be a field and consider the ring $R = k[[x^mathbbR_ge 0]]$ of formal power series of the form $sum_r in S c_r x^r$ where $r in mathbbR_ge 0$ and $S subseteq mathbbR_ge 0$ is well-ordered (this guarantees that multiplication is well-defined). This is a valuation ring.



          For $f in R$ a nonzero power series, write $nu(f) in mathbbR_ge 0$ for the smallest exponent of a nonzero term in $f$. If $I$ is any nonzero ideal of $R$, then if some nonzero $f in I$ has valuation $nu(f)$, then multiplying by every element of $R$, and observing that nonzero every $g in R$ can be written as $x^nu(g)$ times a unit, we see that $I$ contains every element of $R$ with valuation $ge nu(f)$. So the ideals of $R$ come in two infinite families, namely



          $$I_r = f in R : nu(f) ge r , r in mathbbR_ge 0$$



          and



          $$J_r = f in R : nu(f) > r , r in mathbbR_ge 0$$



          (together with the zero ideal, which you can think of as $I_infty$). These ideals are totally ordered and in particular show that $R$ is very far from Noetherian.



          The corresponding quotients $R/I_r$ and $R/J_r$ contain nontrivial nilpotents, and hence $I_r$ and $J_r$ are not prime, except for $J_0$, which is the unique maximal ideal, and $I_0$, which is the unit ideal. So $R$ has exactly two prime ideals, $(0)$ and $J_0$, as desired.






          share|cite|improve this answer














          To expand on Bernard's answer, let $k$ be a field and consider the ring $R = k[[x^mathbbR_ge 0]]$ of formal power series of the form $sum_r in S c_r x^r$ where $r in mathbbR_ge 0$ and $S subseteq mathbbR_ge 0$ is well-ordered (this guarantees that multiplication is well-defined). This is a valuation ring.



          For $f in R$ a nonzero power series, write $nu(f) in mathbbR_ge 0$ for the smallest exponent of a nonzero term in $f$. If $I$ is any nonzero ideal of $R$, then if some nonzero $f in I$ has valuation $nu(f)$, then multiplying by every element of $R$, and observing that nonzero every $g in R$ can be written as $x^nu(g)$ times a unit, we see that $I$ contains every element of $R$ with valuation $ge nu(f)$. So the ideals of $R$ come in two infinite families, namely



          $$I_r = f in R : nu(f) ge r , r in mathbbR_ge 0$$



          and



          $$J_r = f in R : nu(f) > r , r in mathbbR_ge 0$$



          (together with the zero ideal, which you can think of as $I_infty$). These ideals are totally ordered and in particular show that $R$ is very far from Noetherian.



          The corresponding quotients $R/I_r$ and $R/J_r$ contain nontrivial nilpotents, and hence $I_r$ and $J_r$ are not prime, except for $J_0$, which is the unique maximal ideal, and $I_0$, which is the unit ideal. So $R$ has exactly two prime ideals, $(0)$ and $J_0$, as desired.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited yesterday

























          answered 2 days ago









          Qiaochu Yuan

          274k32578914




          274k32578914











          • Great answer, explicit and detailed!
            – Prince M
            yesterday
















          • Great answer, explicit and detailed!
            – Prince M
            yesterday















          Great answer, explicit and detailed!
          – Prince M
          yesterday




          Great answer, explicit and detailed!
          – Prince M
          yesterday










          up vote
          3
          down vote













          A non-discrete valuation ring of height $1$ is such an example.






          share|cite|improve this answer




















          • Ok give me an example verifying the existence of a non discrete valuation ring of height 1
            – Prince M
            2 days ago










          • @Prince: I construct exactly such a thing in my answer.
            – Qiaochu Yuan
            2 days ago










          • I see that! I upvoted yours and will probably accept it. I tried to comment on it and say thank you, but it said my comment was too short.
            – Prince M
            2 days ago










          • Too be honest I always avoid rings of formal power series because I never learned them so they feel uncomfortable.. I should probably get over that!
            – Prince M
            2 days ago














          up vote
          3
          down vote













          A non-discrete valuation ring of height $1$ is such an example.






          share|cite|improve this answer




















          • Ok give me an example verifying the existence of a non discrete valuation ring of height 1
            – Prince M
            2 days ago










          • @Prince: I construct exactly such a thing in my answer.
            – Qiaochu Yuan
            2 days ago










          • I see that! I upvoted yours and will probably accept it. I tried to comment on it and say thank you, but it said my comment was too short.
            – Prince M
            2 days ago










          • Too be honest I always avoid rings of formal power series because I never learned them so they feel uncomfortable.. I should probably get over that!
            – Prince M
            2 days ago












          up vote
          3
          down vote










          up vote
          3
          down vote









          A non-discrete valuation ring of height $1$ is such an example.






          share|cite|improve this answer












          A non-discrete valuation ring of height $1$ is such an example.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered 2 days ago









          Bernard

          115k637108




          115k637108











          • Ok give me an example verifying the existence of a non discrete valuation ring of height 1
            – Prince M
            2 days ago










          • @Prince: I construct exactly such a thing in my answer.
            – Qiaochu Yuan
            2 days ago










          • I see that! I upvoted yours and will probably accept it. I tried to comment on it and say thank you, but it said my comment was too short.
            – Prince M
            2 days ago










          • Too be honest I always avoid rings of formal power series because I never learned them so they feel uncomfortable.. I should probably get over that!
            – Prince M
            2 days ago
















          • Ok give me an example verifying the existence of a non discrete valuation ring of height 1
            – Prince M
            2 days ago










          • @Prince: I construct exactly such a thing in my answer.
            – Qiaochu Yuan
            2 days ago










          • I see that! I upvoted yours and will probably accept it. I tried to comment on it and say thank you, but it said my comment was too short.
            – Prince M
            2 days ago










          • Too be honest I always avoid rings of formal power series because I never learned them so they feel uncomfortable.. I should probably get over that!
            – Prince M
            2 days ago















          Ok give me an example verifying the existence of a non discrete valuation ring of height 1
          – Prince M
          2 days ago




          Ok give me an example verifying the existence of a non discrete valuation ring of height 1
          – Prince M
          2 days ago












          @Prince: I construct exactly such a thing in my answer.
          – Qiaochu Yuan
          2 days ago




          @Prince: I construct exactly such a thing in my answer.
          – Qiaochu Yuan
          2 days ago












          I see that! I upvoted yours and will probably accept it. I tried to comment on it and say thank you, but it said my comment was too short.
          – Prince M
          2 days ago




          I see that! I upvoted yours and will probably accept it. I tried to comment on it and say thank you, but it said my comment was too short.
          – Prince M
          2 days ago












          Too be honest I always avoid rings of formal power series because I never learned them so they feel uncomfortable.. I should probably get over that!
          – Prince M
          2 days ago




          Too be honest I always avoid rings of formal power series because I never learned them so they feel uncomfortable.. I should probably get over that!
          – Prince M
          2 days ago

















           

          draft saved


          draft discarded















































           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2999012%2fconstructing-a-ring-with-a-given-spectrum%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown






          Popular posts from this blog

          How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

          Bahrain

          Postfix configuration issue with fips on centos 7; mailgun relay