Fantastic nervous systems and what powers them

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Nearly all living creatures on this planet have one form or another of a nervous system that transmits sensory data to the creature's brain.



What's really interesting to me is that this data is transmitted with electronic signals. So, my question is if our bodies use electricity to power our nervous systems, then do we naturally generate electricity?



It would be fascinating if I could understand how we naturally harness this power. I can only imagine what leaps our species could make with bioelectric power generators and circuitry.










share|improve this question







New contributor




Austin Trigloff is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.



















  • "Data is transmitted with electronic signals": no it isn't. The nervous systems of living creatures on Earth work mainly with chemical neurotransmitters; the electric signals measured by electrocardiograms and encephalograms are side-effects. Even the propagation of nervous impulses along the axons of neurons is electrochemical. (This is why the speed of nervous impulses is so low, on the order of 20 meters/second at best; electric signals would travel very very much faster.)
    – AlexP
    51 mins ago











  • Thanks for the correction. I
    – Austin Trigloff
    33 mins ago














up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Nearly all living creatures on this planet have one form or another of a nervous system that transmits sensory data to the creature's brain.



What's really interesting to me is that this data is transmitted with electronic signals. So, my question is if our bodies use electricity to power our nervous systems, then do we naturally generate electricity?



It would be fascinating if I could understand how we naturally harness this power. I can only imagine what leaps our species could make with bioelectric power generators and circuitry.










share|improve this question







New contributor




Austin Trigloff is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.



















  • "Data is transmitted with electronic signals": no it isn't. The nervous systems of living creatures on Earth work mainly with chemical neurotransmitters; the electric signals measured by electrocardiograms and encephalograms are side-effects. Even the propagation of nervous impulses along the axons of neurons is electrochemical. (This is why the speed of nervous impulses is so low, on the order of 20 meters/second at best; electric signals would travel very very much faster.)
    – AlexP
    51 mins ago











  • Thanks for the correction. I
    – Austin Trigloff
    33 mins ago












up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











Nearly all living creatures on this planet have one form or another of a nervous system that transmits sensory data to the creature's brain.



What's really interesting to me is that this data is transmitted with electronic signals. So, my question is if our bodies use electricity to power our nervous systems, then do we naturally generate electricity?



It would be fascinating if I could understand how we naturally harness this power. I can only imagine what leaps our species could make with bioelectric power generators and circuitry.










share|improve this question







New contributor




Austin Trigloff is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











Nearly all living creatures on this planet have one form or another of a nervous system that transmits sensory data to the creature's brain.



What's really interesting to me is that this data is transmitted with electronic signals. So, my question is if our bodies use electricity to power our nervous systems, then do we naturally generate electricity?



It would be fascinating if I could understand how we naturally harness this power. I can only imagine what leaps our species could make with bioelectric power generators and circuitry.







biology electricity






share|improve this question







New contributor




Austin Trigloff is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question







New contributor




Austin Trigloff is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor




Austin Trigloff is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 1 hour ago









Austin Trigloff

295




295




New contributor




Austin Trigloff is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Austin Trigloff is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Austin Trigloff is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











  • "Data is transmitted with electronic signals": no it isn't. The nervous systems of living creatures on Earth work mainly with chemical neurotransmitters; the electric signals measured by electrocardiograms and encephalograms are side-effects. Even the propagation of nervous impulses along the axons of neurons is electrochemical. (This is why the speed of nervous impulses is so low, on the order of 20 meters/second at best; electric signals would travel very very much faster.)
    – AlexP
    51 mins ago











  • Thanks for the correction. I
    – Austin Trigloff
    33 mins ago
















  • "Data is transmitted with electronic signals": no it isn't. The nervous systems of living creatures on Earth work mainly with chemical neurotransmitters; the electric signals measured by electrocardiograms and encephalograms are side-effects. Even the propagation of nervous impulses along the axons of neurons is electrochemical. (This is why the speed of nervous impulses is so low, on the order of 20 meters/second at best; electric signals would travel very very much faster.)
    – AlexP
    51 mins ago











  • Thanks for the correction. I
    – Austin Trigloff
    33 mins ago















"Data is transmitted with electronic signals": no it isn't. The nervous systems of living creatures on Earth work mainly with chemical neurotransmitters; the electric signals measured by electrocardiograms and encephalograms are side-effects. Even the propagation of nervous impulses along the axons of neurons is electrochemical. (This is why the speed of nervous impulses is so low, on the order of 20 meters/second at best; electric signals would travel very very much faster.)
– AlexP
51 mins ago





"Data is transmitted with electronic signals": no it isn't. The nervous systems of living creatures on Earth work mainly with chemical neurotransmitters; the electric signals measured by electrocardiograms and encephalograms are side-effects. Even the propagation of nervous impulses along the axons of neurons is electrochemical. (This is why the speed of nervous impulses is so low, on the order of 20 meters/second at best; electric signals would travel very very much faster.)
– AlexP
51 mins ago













Thanks for the correction. I
– Austin Trigloff
33 mins ago




Thanks for the correction. I
– Austin Trigloff
33 mins ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
3
down vote













We do indeed generate electricity, though it is a tiny amount. The electrical energy available from neurons firing is somewhere around 85mW. There's plenty of power going around through the brain. The brain consumes 20W of power in the form of sugars, but most of it does not go to the electrical impulses.



For some points of reference, a USB device is allowed to draw up to 2500mW (2.5W), and that can go up to 10W with some negotiations. A hairdryer may consume 1000W and the Nisan Leaf comes with a 80,000W engine!



We generate electricity by ion pumps. These are small molecular structures on the surface of neurons which use energy (in the form of ATP) to create an electrical potential. If the neuron fires, this potential changes rapidly, propagating a tiny electric charge.



The power of the body is not in its electrical subsystem. The power of the body is in its ability to carry fuel (glucose) and oxidizer (oxygen) to all the cells in the body. If the body wants to transmit power, it uses these tools rather than electricity. Your muscles are stimulated by electrical impulses, but the brute lifting is done purely chemically.



We have looked at harnessing that bioelectric energy. There have been efforts to make blood sugar meters that are embedded under your skin without batteries. They rely on blood sugar and blood oxygen to react within a fuel-cell, generating the power to manage the meter!






share|improve this answer




















  • Fascinating. I had no idea the body uses sugars to this extent.
    – Austin Trigloff
    30 mins ago

















up vote
1
down vote













According to this article our brain generates only 0.085 Watts. And about leaps. Suppose you have a modern processor and supply it with significantly more volts. Will the processor work faster? There is a thin area for overclocking but generally it will be destroyed by high voltage. I suppose the brain has the same problem. It just has a specific voltage and current with which it works, but it won't work with higher parameters.



And the human brain is currently a black box. No one knows how we do 1+1=2. So adding additional circuits does not really make sense.



I think the idea of Elon Musk of a direct interface of a human brain and a computer is much more promising than changing the brain itself. A direct interface allows us to be better at the following tasks:



  1. Perfect memory

  2. Fast mathematical computations

  3. Better remote communication. Communication may even be better than oral.

  4. Adding additional sensors (night vision, radiation measurements)

And the interface does not need to understand how the brain works. It only needs to be able to communicate with it.






share|improve this answer




















    Your Answer




    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "579"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );






    Austin Trigloff is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f128713%2ffantastic-nervous-systems-and-what-powers-them%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    3
    down vote













    We do indeed generate electricity, though it is a tiny amount. The electrical energy available from neurons firing is somewhere around 85mW. There's plenty of power going around through the brain. The brain consumes 20W of power in the form of sugars, but most of it does not go to the electrical impulses.



    For some points of reference, a USB device is allowed to draw up to 2500mW (2.5W), and that can go up to 10W with some negotiations. A hairdryer may consume 1000W and the Nisan Leaf comes with a 80,000W engine!



    We generate electricity by ion pumps. These are small molecular structures on the surface of neurons which use energy (in the form of ATP) to create an electrical potential. If the neuron fires, this potential changes rapidly, propagating a tiny electric charge.



    The power of the body is not in its electrical subsystem. The power of the body is in its ability to carry fuel (glucose) and oxidizer (oxygen) to all the cells in the body. If the body wants to transmit power, it uses these tools rather than electricity. Your muscles are stimulated by electrical impulses, but the brute lifting is done purely chemically.



    We have looked at harnessing that bioelectric energy. There have been efforts to make blood sugar meters that are embedded under your skin without batteries. They rely on blood sugar and blood oxygen to react within a fuel-cell, generating the power to manage the meter!






    share|improve this answer




















    • Fascinating. I had no idea the body uses sugars to this extent.
      – Austin Trigloff
      30 mins ago














    up vote
    3
    down vote













    We do indeed generate electricity, though it is a tiny amount. The electrical energy available from neurons firing is somewhere around 85mW. There's plenty of power going around through the brain. The brain consumes 20W of power in the form of sugars, but most of it does not go to the electrical impulses.



    For some points of reference, a USB device is allowed to draw up to 2500mW (2.5W), and that can go up to 10W with some negotiations. A hairdryer may consume 1000W and the Nisan Leaf comes with a 80,000W engine!



    We generate electricity by ion pumps. These are small molecular structures on the surface of neurons which use energy (in the form of ATP) to create an electrical potential. If the neuron fires, this potential changes rapidly, propagating a tiny electric charge.



    The power of the body is not in its electrical subsystem. The power of the body is in its ability to carry fuel (glucose) and oxidizer (oxygen) to all the cells in the body. If the body wants to transmit power, it uses these tools rather than electricity. Your muscles are stimulated by electrical impulses, but the brute lifting is done purely chemically.



    We have looked at harnessing that bioelectric energy. There have been efforts to make blood sugar meters that are embedded under your skin without batteries. They rely on blood sugar and blood oxygen to react within a fuel-cell, generating the power to manage the meter!






    share|improve this answer




















    • Fascinating. I had no idea the body uses sugars to this extent.
      – Austin Trigloff
      30 mins ago












    up vote
    3
    down vote










    up vote
    3
    down vote









    We do indeed generate electricity, though it is a tiny amount. The electrical energy available from neurons firing is somewhere around 85mW. There's plenty of power going around through the brain. The brain consumes 20W of power in the form of sugars, but most of it does not go to the electrical impulses.



    For some points of reference, a USB device is allowed to draw up to 2500mW (2.5W), and that can go up to 10W with some negotiations. A hairdryer may consume 1000W and the Nisan Leaf comes with a 80,000W engine!



    We generate electricity by ion pumps. These are small molecular structures on the surface of neurons which use energy (in the form of ATP) to create an electrical potential. If the neuron fires, this potential changes rapidly, propagating a tiny electric charge.



    The power of the body is not in its electrical subsystem. The power of the body is in its ability to carry fuel (glucose) and oxidizer (oxygen) to all the cells in the body. If the body wants to transmit power, it uses these tools rather than electricity. Your muscles are stimulated by electrical impulses, but the brute lifting is done purely chemically.



    We have looked at harnessing that bioelectric energy. There have been efforts to make blood sugar meters that are embedded under your skin without batteries. They rely on blood sugar and blood oxygen to react within a fuel-cell, generating the power to manage the meter!






    share|improve this answer












    We do indeed generate electricity, though it is a tiny amount. The electrical energy available from neurons firing is somewhere around 85mW. There's plenty of power going around through the brain. The brain consumes 20W of power in the form of sugars, but most of it does not go to the electrical impulses.



    For some points of reference, a USB device is allowed to draw up to 2500mW (2.5W), and that can go up to 10W with some negotiations. A hairdryer may consume 1000W and the Nisan Leaf comes with a 80,000W engine!



    We generate electricity by ion pumps. These are small molecular structures on the surface of neurons which use energy (in the form of ATP) to create an electrical potential. If the neuron fires, this potential changes rapidly, propagating a tiny electric charge.



    The power of the body is not in its electrical subsystem. The power of the body is in its ability to carry fuel (glucose) and oxidizer (oxygen) to all the cells in the body. If the body wants to transmit power, it uses these tools rather than electricity. Your muscles are stimulated by electrical impulses, but the brute lifting is done purely chemically.



    We have looked at harnessing that bioelectric energy. There have been efforts to make blood sugar meters that are embedded under your skin without batteries. They rely on blood sugar and blood oxygen to react within a fuel-cell, generating the power to manage the meter!







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered 52 mins ago









    Cort Ammon

    103k15180367




    103k15180367











    • Fascinating. I had no idea the body uses sugars to this extent.
      – Austin Trigloff
      30 mins ago
















    • Fascinating. I had no idea the body uses sugars to this extent.
      – Austin Trigloff
      30 mins ago















    Fascinating. I had no idea the body uses sugars to this extent.
    – Austin Trigloff
    30 mins ago




    Fascinating. I had no idea the body uses sugars to this extent.
    – Austin Trigloff
    30 mins ago










    up vote
    1
    down vote













    According to this article our brain generates only 0.085 Watts. And about leaps. Suppose you have a modern processor and supply it with significantly more volts. Will the processor work faster? There is a thin area for overclocking but generally it will be destroyed by high voltage. I suppose the brain has the same problem. It just has a specific voltage and current with which it works, but it won't work with higher parameters.



    And the human brain is currently a black box. No one knows how we do 1+1=2. So adding additional circuits does not really make sense.



    I think the idea of Elon Musk of a direct interface of a human brain and a computer is much more promising than changing the brain itself. A direct interface allows us to be better at the following tasks:



    1. Perfect memory

    2. Fast mathematical computations

    3. Better remote communication. Communication may even be better than oral.

    4. Adding additional sensors (night vision, radiation measurements)

    And the interface does not need to understand how the brain works. It only needs to be able to communicate with it.






    share|improve this answer
























      up vote
      1
      down vote













      According to this article our brain generates only 0.085 Watts. And about leaps. Suppose you have a modern processor and supply it with significantly more volts. Will the processor work faster? There is a thin area for overclocking but generally it will be destroyed by high voltage. I suppose the brain has the same problem. It just has a specific voltage and current with which it works, but it won't work with higher parameters.



      And the human brain is currently a black box. No one knows how we do 1+1=2. So adding additional circuits does not really make sense.



      I think the idea of Elon Musk of a direct interface of a human brain and a computer is much more promising than changing the brain itself. A direct interface allows us to be better at the following tasks:



      1. Perfect memory

      2. Fast mathematical computations

      3. Better remote communication. Communication may even be better than oral.

      4. Adding additional sensors (night vision, radiation measurements)

      And the interface does not need to understand how the brain works. It only needs to be able to communicate with it.






      share|improve this answer






















        up vote
        1
        down vote










        up vote
        1
        down vote









        According to this article our brain generates only 0.085 Watts. And about leaps. Suppose you have a modern processor and supply it with significantly more volts. Will the processor work faster? There is a thin area for overclocking but generally it will be destroyed by high voltage. I suppose the brain has the same problem. It just has a specific voltage and current with which it works, but it won't work with higher parameters.



        And the human brain is currently a black box. No one knows how we do 1+1=2. So adding additional circuits does not really make sense.



        I think the idea of Elon Musk of a direct interface of a human brain and a computer is much more promising than changing the brain itself. A direct interface allows us to be better at the following tasks:



        1. Perfect memory

        2. Fast mathematical computations

        3. Better remote communication. Communication may even be better than oral.

        4. Adding additional sensors (night vision, radiation measurements)

        And the interface does not need to understand how the brain works. It only needs to be able to communicate with it.






        share|improve this answer












        According to this article our brain generates only 0.085 Watts. And about leaps. Suppose you have a modern processor and supply it with significantly more volts. Will the processor work faster? There is a thin area for overclocking but generally it will be destroyed by high voltage. I suppose the brain has the same problem. It just has a specific voltage and current with which it works, but it won't work with higher parameters.



        And the human brain is currently a black box. No one knows how we do 1+1=2. So adding additional circuits does not really make sense.



        I think the idea of Elon Musk of a direct interface of a human brain and a computer is much more promising than changing the brain itself. A direct interface allows us to be better at the following tasks:



        1. Perfect memory

        2. Fast mathematical computations

        3. Better remote communication. Communication may even be better than oral.

        4. Adding additional sensors (night vision, radiation measurements)

        And the interface does not need to understand how the brain works. It only needs to be able to communicate with it.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 40 mins ago









        keiv.fly

        43415




        43415




















            Austin Trigloff is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            Austin Trigloff is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            Austin Trigloff is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











            Austin Trigloff is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f128713%2ffantastic-nervous-systems-and-what-powers-them%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest













































































            Popular posts from this blog

            How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

            Displaying single band from multi-band raster using QGIS

            How many registers does an x86_64 CPU actually have?