CentOS: Why So Many Redundant Folders?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
After a CentOS 7 Minimal install, and a yum update, I analyzed the folders.
/ and /usr/ and /usr/local/ all have:
bin etc lib lib64 sbin
/ and /usr/ both also have:
tmp
/usr/ and /usr/local both also have:
games include libexec share src
I've seen many other folders that also have in common:
games lib var
With all that noted, does CentOS have a good reason for having these same folder names in different locations, rather than putting all content of a similar/same kind in 1, or less than the current quantity, of locations?
centos
migrated from webmasters.stackexchange.com 41 mins ago
This question came from our site for pro webmasters.
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
After a CentOS 7 Minimal install, and a yum update, I analyzed the folders.
/ and /usr/ and /usr/local/ all have:
bin etc lib lib64 sbin
/ and /usr/ both also have:
tmp
/usr/ and /usr/local both also have:
games include libexec share src
I've seen many other folders that also have in common:
games lib var
With all that noted, does CentOS have a good reason for having these same folder names in different locations, rather than putting all content of a similar/same kind in 1, or less than the current quantity, of locations?
centos
migrated from webmasters.stackexchange.com 41 mins ago
This question came from our site for pro webmasters.
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
After a CentOS 7 Minimal install, and a yum update, I analyzed the folders.
/ and /usr/ and /usr/local/ all have:
bin etc lib lib64 sbin
/ and /usr/ both also have:
tmp
/usr/ and /usr/local both also have:
games include libexec share src
I've seen many other folders that also have in common:
games lib var
With all that noted, does CentOS have a good reason for having these same folder names in different locations, rather than putting all content of a similar/same kind in 1, or less than the current quantity, of locations?
centos
After a CentOS 7 Minimal install, and a yum update, I analyzed the folders.
/ and /usr/ and /usr/local/ all have:
bin etc lib lib64 sbin
/ and /usr/ both also have:
tmp
/usr/ and /usr/local both also have:
games include libexec share src
I've seen many other folders that also have in common:
games lib var
With all that noted, does CentOS have a good reason for having these same folder names in different locations, rather than putting all content of a similar/same kind in 1, or less than the current quantity, of locations?
centos
centos
asked 7 hours ago
abcjme
11
11
migrated from webmasters.stackexchange.com 41 mins ago
This question came from our site for pro webmasters.
migrated from webmasters.stackexchange.com 41 mins ago
This question came from our site for pro webmasters.
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f478317%2fcentos-why-so-many-redundant-folders%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password