What is this airplane I saw with propellers behind the engine and canards on the top of the plane?

Multi tool use
Multi tool use

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
4
down vote

favorite












While playing Pokémon GO, I saw a plane with:



  • Propellers behind the engine.

  • Canards at the tip of the plane.

  • Normal-looking tail with a flat wing at the end of the upright bit.

I know these are probably not the correct terms, but I'm not sure what else to call those components.






aircraft-identification







share|improve this question























  • Could it be a VariEze? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rutan_VariEze
    – copper.hat
    Aug 13 at 15:57










  • The terms you're looking for: "Propellers behind the engine": this is a pusher configuration. "Normal looking tail with a flat wing at the end of the upright bit": this sounds like a T-tail.
    – Mark
    Aug 13 at 21:21















up vote
4
down vote

favorite












While playing Pokémon GO, I saw a plane with:



  • Propellers behind the engine.

  • Canards at the tip of the plane.

  • Normal-looking tail with a flat wing at the end of the upright bit.

I know these are probably not the correct terms, but I'm not sure what else to call those components.






aircraft-identification







share|improve this question























  • Could it be a VariEze? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rutan_VariEze
    – copper.hat
    Aug 13 at 15:57










  • The terms you're looking for: "Propellers behind the engine": this is a pusher configuration. "Normal looking tail with a flat wing at the end of the upright bit": this sounds like a T-tail.
    – Mark
    Aug 13 at 21:21













up vote
4
down vote

favorite









up vote
4
down vote

favorite











While playing Pokémon GO, I saw a plane with:



  • Propellers behind the engine.

  • Canards at the tip of the plane.

  • Normal-looking tail with a flat wing at the end of the upright bit.

I know these are probably not the correct terms, but I'm not sure what else to call those components.






aircraft-identification







share|improve this question















While playing Pokémon GO, I saw a plane with:



  • Propellers behind the engine.

  • Canards at the tip of the plane.

  • Normal-looking tail with a flat wing at the end of the upright bit.

I know these are probably not the correct terms, but I'm not sure what else to call those components.






aircraft-identification




aircraft-identification






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Aug 14 at 8:26









Rodrigo de Azevedo

6741519




6741519










asked Aug 13 at 8:52









Pureferret

331212




331212











  • Could it be a VariEze? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rutan_VariEze
    – copper.hat
    Aug 13 at 15:57










  • The terms you're looking for: "Propellers behind the engine": this is a pusher configuration. "Normal looking tail with a flat wing at the end of the upright bit": this sounds like a T-tail.
    – Mark
    Aug 13 at 21:21

















  • Could it be a VariEze? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rutan_VariEze
    – copper.hat
    Aug 13 at 15:57










  • The terms you're looking for: "Propellers behind the engine": this is a pusher configuration. "Normal looking tail with a flat wing at the end of the upright bit": this sounds like a T-tail.
    – Mark
    Aug 13 at 21:21
















Could it be a VariEze? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rutan_VariEze
– copper.hat
Aug 13 at 15:57




Could it be a VariEze? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rutan_VariEze
– copper.hat
Aug 13 at 15:57












The terms you're looking for: "Propellers behind the engine": this is a pusher configuration. "Normal looking tail with a flat wing at the end of the upright bit": this sounds like a T-tail.
– Mark
Aug 13 at 21:21





The terms you're looking for: "Propellers behind the engine": this is a pusher configuration. "Normal looking tail with a flat wing at the end of the upright bit": this sounds like a T-tail.
– Mark
Aug 13 at 21:21











1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
22
down vote













The "propellers behind the engine" is called a "push configuration". One you look through aircraft that are private business planes, the Piaggio P.180 Avanti comes up as a likely contender.



the p.180 Avanti banking on a turn






share|improve this answer


















  • 3




    The stabilizer arrangement here is usually called a "three-surface" -- both canard and conventional stabilizer in addition to the main wing. There are a number of current and next generation jet fighters with this layout, as well, though of course they don't have pusher propellers.
    – Zeiss Ikon
    Aug 13 at 11:05






  • 2




    Could have been a Beechcraft Starship too, I don't have a picture on hand. Large plane or small?
    – CrossRoads
    Aug 13 at 15:16






  • 2




    The Starship does not have a "normal looking tail", though.
    – Skyler
    Aug 13 at 16:50










  • @CrossRoads I'm begining to wonder if that was it? Picture.
    – Pureferret
    Aug 14 at 8:25











Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "528"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f54240%2fwhat-is-this-airplane-i-saw-with-propellers-behind-the-engine-and-canards-on-the%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest

















1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
22
down vote













The "propellers behind the engine" is called a "push configuration". One you look through aircraft that are private business planes, the Piaggio P.180 Avanti comes up as a likely contender.



the p.180 Avanti banking on a turn






share|improve this answer


















  • 3




    The stabilizer arrangement here is usually called a "three-surface" -- both canard and conventional stabilizer in addition to the main wing. There are a number of current and next generation jet fighters with this layout, as well, though of course they don't have pusher propellers.
    – Zeiss Ikon
    Aug 13 at 11:05






  • 2




    Could have been a Beechcraft Starship too, I don't have a picture on hand. Large plane or small?
    – CrossRoads
    Aug 13 at 15:16






  • 2




    The Starship does not have a "normal looking tail", though.
    – Skyler
    Aug 13 at 16:50










  • @CrossRoads I'm begining to wonder if that was it? Picture.
    – Pureferret
    Aug 14 at 8:25















up vote
22
down vote













The "propellers behind the engine" is called a "push configuration". One you look through aircraft that are private business planes, the Piaggio P.180 Avanti comes up as a likely contender.



the p.180 Avanti banking on a turn






share|improve this answer


















  • 3




    The stabilizer arrangement here is usually called a "three-surface" -- both canard and conventional stabilizer in addition to the main wing. There are a number of current and next generation jet fighters with this layout, as well, though of course they don't have pusher propellers.
    – Zeiss Ikon
    Aug 13 at 11:05






  • 2




    Could have been a Beechcraft Starship too, I don't have a picture on hand. Large plane or small?
    – CrossRoads
    Aug 13 at 15:16






  • 2




    The Starship does not have a "normal looking tail", though.
    – Skyler
    Aug 13 at 16:50










  • @CrossRoads I'm begining to wonder if that was it? Picture.
    – Pureferret
    Aug 14 at 8:25













up vote
22
down vote










up vote
22
down vote









The "propellers behind the engine" is called a "push configuration". One you look through aircraft that are private business planes, the Piaggio P.180 Avanti comes up as a likely contender.



the p.180 Avanti banking on a turn






share|improve this answer














The "propellers behind the engine" is called a "push configuration". One you look through aircraft that are private business planes, the Piaggio P.180 Avanti comes up as a likely contender.



the p.180 Avanti banking on a turn







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Aug 13 at 10:05

























answered Aug 13 at 8:52









Pureferret

331212




331212







  • 3




    The stabilizer arrangement here is usually called a "three-surface" -- both canard and conventional stabilizer in addition to the main wing. There are a number of current and next generation jet fighters with this layout, as well, though of course they don't have pusher propellers.
    – Zeiss Ikon
    Aug 13 at 11:05






  • 2




    Could have been a Beechcraft Starship too, I don't have a picture on hand. Large plane or small?
    – CrossRoads
    Aug 13 at 15:16






  • 2




    The Starship does not have a "normal looking tail", though.
    – Skyler
    Aug 13 at 16:50










  • @CrossRoads I'm begining to wonder if that was it? Picture.
    – Pureferret
    Aug 14 at 8:25













  • 3




    The stabilizer arrangement here is usually called a "three-surface" -- both canard and conventional stabilizer in addition to the main wing. There are a number of current and next generation jet fighters with this layout, as well, though of course they don't have pusher propellers.
    – Zeiss Ikon
    Aug 13 at 11:05






  • 2




    Could have been a Beechcraft Starship too, I don't have a picture on hand. Large plane or small?
    – CrossRoads
    Aug 13 at 15:16






  • 2




    The Starship does not have a "normal looking tail", though.
    – Skyler
    Aug 13 at 16:50










  • @CrossRoads I'm begining to wonder if that was it? Picture.
    – Pureferret
    Aug 14 at 8:25








3




3




The stabilizer arrangement here is usually called a "three-surface" -- both canard and conventional stabilizer in addition to the main wing. There are a number of current and next generation jet fighters with this layout, as well, though of course they don't have pusher propellers.
– Zeiss Ikon
Aug 13 at 11:05




The stabilizer arrangement here is usually called a "three-surface" -- both canard and conventional stabilizer in addition to the main wing. There are a number of current and next generation jet fighters with this layout, as well, though of course they don't have pusher propellers.
– Zeiss Ikon
Aug 13 at 11:05




2




2




Could have been a Beechcraft Starship too, I don't have a picture on hand. Large plane or small?
– CrossRoads
Aug 13 at 15:16




Could have been a Beechcraft Starship too, I don't have a picture on hand. Large plane or small?
– CrossRoads
Aug 13 at 15:16




2




2




The Starship does not have a "normal looking tail", though.
– Skyler
Aug 13 at 16:50




The Starship does not have a "normal looking tail", though.
– Skyler
Aug 13 at 16:50












@CrossRoads I'm begining to wonder if that was it? Picture.
– Pureferret
Aug 14 at 8:25





@CrossRoads I'm begining to wonder if that was it? Picture.
– Pureferret
Aug 14 at 8:25


















 

draft saved


draft discarded















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f54240%2fwhat-is-this-airplane-i-saw-with-propellers-behind-the-engine-and-canards-on-the%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest
































































A XWrq6vdcs46dV kcmjZQ6GXG3ZI hRF,HBIXJ7R0v5SgoGOIAvE,nl vTzoi Vixzo 4MXb8viKfb
-
xiqHmu8 TD2E2GcvxnbZtH7PiBofWXif7xN,6W4QC8QGgpp84RjOvpSCMxpa8nN9Z,8UYG,h,8dr3tetnr,34VwL0yKIMpMO4ZJHr4

Popular posts from this blog

How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

Image
Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 1 down vote favorite I'm using WordPress 4.9.8, CiviCRM to 5.5.1, I usually send email to contact by Search> Find contacts View contact details Action> Send email Send email ok, Contact received mail ok like picture But status only Email sent though contact read email or not. So, can CiviCRM can change status to Email read when contact read email? wordpress email share | improve this question asked Sep 26 at 0:12 ToanLuong 49 9 add a comment  |  up vote 1 down vote favorite I'm using WordPress 4.9.8, CiviCRM to 5.5.1, I usually send email to contact by Search> Find contacts View contact details Action> Send email Send email ok, Contact received mail ok like picture But status only Email sent though contact read email or not. So, can CiviCRM can change status to Email read when contact read email? wordpress email share | improve this questi...
Read more

How many registers does an x86_64 CPU actually have?

Image
Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 2 down vote favorite I am currently learning reverse engineering and am studying the flags register. I had in my mind that rflags was just another name for one of the 16 general purpose registers, for example rax or rbx . But it looks like rflags is actually an additional register. So that makes 17 registers in total... how many more could there be? I have spent at least an hour on this and found numerous different answers. The best answer so far is this, which says that there are 40 registers in total. 16 General Purpose Registers 2 Status Registers 6 Code Segment Registers 16 SSE Registers 8 FPU/MMX Registers But if I add that up, I get 48. Could anybody provide an official answer on how many registers an x86_64 CPU has (e.g. an Intel i7). Additionally, I have seen references to 'hardware' and 'architectural' registers. What are those registers and how many are there? register x86-64 share | improve this...
Read more

Displaying single band from multi-band raster using QGIS

Image
Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP 1 How can I extract a single band from multi-band raster in QGIS? I have an remote sensed image which has 6 bands (including NDVI band), I want to display each band separately, but have no idea how to do. I have seen some questions similar here but none worked for me. The original image (has 6 bands) is: I want to display the band 6 which should be like this: But I tried gdal_translate, and couldn't get the correct result. What I have got is: qgis raster multi-band share | improve this question edited Mar 5 at 0:53 Summer asked Mar 4 at 6:42 Summer Summer 23 6 Is this any help gis.stackexchange.com/questions/220658/… ? if not gis.stackexchange.com/questions/62133/… might help. – Michael Stimson Mar 4 at 6:46 Thanks for answering but when I used gdal_translate, qgis showed that 'Error 4: Kayena.tif: No such file or directory". Would you know how to fi...
Read more