What is this airplane I saw with propellers behind the engine and canards on the top of the plane?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
While playing Pokémon GO, I saw a plane with:
- Propellers behind the engine.
- Canards at the tip of the plane.
- Normal-looking tail with a flat wing at the end of the upright bit.
I know these are probably not the correct terms, but I'm not sure what else to call those components.
aircraft-identification
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
While playing Pokémon GO, I saw a plane with:
- Propellers behind the engine.
- Canards at the tip of the plane.
- Normal-looking tail with a flat wing at the end of the upright bit.
I know these are probably not the correct terms, but I'm not sure what else to call those components.
aircraft-identification
Could it be a VariEze? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rutan_VariEze
â copper.hat
Aug 13 at 15:57
The terms you're looking for: "Propellers behind the engine": this is a pusher configuration. "Normal looking tail with a flat wing at the end of the upright bit": this sounds like a T-tail.
â Mark
Aug 13 at 21:21
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
While playing Pokémon GO, I saw a plane with:
- Propellers behind the engine.
- Canards at the tip of the plane.
- Normal-looking tail with a flat wing at the end of the upright bit.
I know these are probably not the correct terms, but I'm not sure what else to call those components.
aircraft-identification
While playing Pokémon GO, I saw a plane with:
- Propellers behind the engine.
- Canards at the tip of the plane.
- Normal-looking tail with a flat wing at the end of the upright bit.
I know these are probably not the correct terms, but I'm not sure what else to call those components.
aircraft-identification
aircraft-identification
edited Aug 14 at 8:26
Rodrigo de Azevedo
6741519
6741519
asked Aug 13 at 8:52
Pureferret
331212
331212
Could it be a VariEze? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rutan_VariEze
â copper.hat
Aug 13 at 15:57
The terms you're looking for: "Propellers behind the engine": this is a pusher configuration. "Normal looking tail with a flat wing at the end of the upright bit": this sounds like a T-tail.
â Mark
Aug 13 at 21:21
add a comment |Â
Could it be a VariEze? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rutan_VariEze
â copper.hat
Aug 13 at 15:57
The terms you're looking for: "Propellers behind the engine": this is a pusher configuration. "Normal looking tail with a flat wing at the end of the upright bit": this sounds like a T-tail.
â Mark
Aug 13 at 21:21
Could it be a VariEze? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rutan_VariEze
â copper.hat
Aug 13 at 15:57
Could it be a VariEze? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rutan_VariEze
â copper.hat
Aug 13 at 15:57
The terms you're looking for: "Propellers behind the engine": this is a pusher configuration. "Normal looking tail with a flat wing at the end of the upright bit": this sounds like a T-tail.
â Mark
Aug 13 at 21:21
The terms you're looking for: "Propellers behind the engine": this is a pusher configuration. "Normal looking tail with a flat wing at the end of the upright bit": this sounds like a T-tail.
â Mark
Aug 13 at 21:21
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
22
down vote
The "propellers behind the engine" is called a "push configuration". One you look through aircraft that are private business planes, the Piaggio P.180 Avanti comes up as a likely contender.
3
The stabilizer arrangement here is usually called a "three-surface" -- both canard and conventional stabilizer in addition to the main wing. There are a number of current and next generation jet fighters with this layout, as well, though of course they don't have pusher propellers.
â Zeiss Ikon
Aug 13 at 11:05
2
Could have been a Beechcraft Starship too, I don't have a picture on hand. Large plane or small?
â CrossRoads
Aug 13 at 15:16
2
The Starship does not have a "normal looking tail", though.
â Skyler
Aug 13 at 16:50
@CrossRoads I'm begining to wonder if that was it? Picture.
â Pureferret
Aug 14 at 8:25
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
22
down vote
The "propellers behind the engine" is called a "push configuration". One you look through aircraft that are private business planes, the Piaggio P.180 Avanti comes up as a likely contender.
3
The stabilizer arrangement here is usually called a "three-surface" -- both canard and conventional stabilizer in addition to the main wing. There are a number of current and next generation jet fighters with this layout, as well, though of course they don't have pusher propellers.
â Zeiss Ikon
Aug 13 at 11:05
2
Could have been a Beechcraft Starship too, I don't have a picture on hand. Large plane or small?
â CrossRoads
Aug 13 at 15:16
2
The Starship does not have a "normal looking tail", though.
â Skyler
Aug 13 at 16:50
@CrossRoads I'm begining to wonder if that was it? Picture.
â Pureferret
Aug 14 at 8:25
add a comment |Â
up vote
22
down vote
The "propellers behind the engine" is called a "push configuration". One you look through aircraft that are private business planes, the Piaggio P.180 Avanti comes up as a likely contender.
3
The stabilizer arrangement here is usually called a "three-surface" -- both canard and conventional stabilizer in addition to the main wing. There are a number of current and next generation jet fighters with this layout, as well, though of course they don't have pusher propellers.
â Zeiss Ikon
Aug 13 at 11:05
2
Could have been a Beechcraft Starship too, I don't have a picture on hand. Large plane or small?
â CrossRoads
Aug 13 at 15:16
2
The Starship does not have a "normal looking tail", though.
â Skyler
Aug 13 at 16:50
@CrossRoads I'm begining to wonder if that was it? Picture.
â Pureferret
Aug 14 at 8:25
add a comment |Â
up vote
22
down vote
up vote
22
down vote
The "propellers behind the engine" is called a "push configuration". One you look through aircraft that are private business planes, the Piaggio P.180 Avanti comes up as a likely contender.
The "propellers behind the engine" is called a "push configuration". One you look through aircraft that are private business planes, the Piaggio P.180 Avanti comes up as a likely contender.
edited Aug 13 at 10:05
answered Aug 13 at 8:52
Pureferret
331212
331212
3
The stabilizer arrangement here is usually called a "three-surface" -- both canard and conventional stabilizer in addition to the main wing. There are a number of current and next generation jet fighters with this layout, as well, though of course they don't have pusher propellers.
â Zeiss Ikon
Aug 13 at 11:05
2
Could have been a Beechcraft Starship too, I don't have a picture on hand. Large plane or small?
â CrossRoads
Aug 13 at 15:16
2
The Starship does not have a "normal looking tail", though.
â Skyler
Aug 13 at 16:50
@CrossRoads I'm begining to wonder if that was it? Picture.
â Pureferret
Aug 14 at 8:25
add a comment |Â
3
The stabilizer arrangement here is usually called a "three-surface" -- both canard and conventional stabilizer in addition to the main wing. There are a number of current and next generation jet fighters with this layout, as well, though of course they don't have pusher propellers.
â Zeiss Ikon
Aug 13 at 11:05
2
Could have been a Beechcraft Starship too, I don't have a picture on hand. Large plane or small?
â CrossRoads
Aug 13 at 15:16
2
The Starship does not have a "normal looking tail", though.
â Skyler
Aug 13 at 16:50
@CrossRoads I'm begining to wonder if that was it? Picture.
â Pureferret
Aug 14 at 8:25
3
3
The stabilizer arrangement here is usually called a "three-surface" -- both canard and conventional stabilizer in addition to the main wing. There are a number of current and next generation jet fighters with this layout, as well, though of course they don't have pusher propellers.
â Zeiss Ikon
Aug 13 at 11:05
The stabilizer arrangement here is usually called a "three-surface" -- both canard and conventional stabilizer in addition to the main wing. There are a number of current and next generation jet fighters with this layout, as well, though of course they don't have pusher propellers.
â Zeiss Ikon
Aug 13 at 11:05
2
2
Could have been a Beechcraft Starship too, I don't have a picture on hand. Large plane or small?
â CrossRoads
Aug 13 at 15:16
Could have been a Beechcraft Starship too, I don't have a picture on hand. Large plane or small?
â CrossRoads
Aug 13 at 15:16
2
2
The Starship does not have a "normal looking tail", though.
â Skyler
Aug 13 at 16:50
The Starship does not have a "normal looking tail", though.
â Skyler
Aug 13 at 16:50
@CrossRoads I'm begining to wonder if that was it? Picture.
â Pureferret
Aug 14 at 8:25
@CrossRoads I'm begining to wonder if that was it? Picture.
â Pureferret
Aug 14 at 8:25
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f54240%2fwhat-is-this-airplane-i-saw-with-propellers-behind-the-engine-and-canards-on-the%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Could it be a VariEze? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rutan_VariEze
â copper.hat
Aug 13 at 15:57
The terms you're looking for: "Propellers behind the engine": this is a pusher configuration. "Normal looking tail with a flat wing at the end of the upright bit": this sounds like a T-tail.
â Mark
Aug 13 at 21:21