Rename Files to Consecutive Integers [duplicate]

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite













This question already has an answer here:



  • Batch rename files to a sequential numbering

    5 answers



I have bunch of files in one directory, like these:



0002.b3120c4bcbf3101e661161ee7efcb8bf
0003.acfc5ad94bbd27118a0d8685d18c89dd
0004.e8d5727378ddde5c3be181df593f1712
0005.8c3b9e9c0f3f183ddaf7592a11b99957


And so on...



And I want to rename them to something easier to manipulate in a script:



2
3
4
5


And so on...



How to do it in Linux shell or script?






bash shell-script files rename







share|improve this question















marked as duplicate by Jeff Schaller, schily, Community♦ Aug 13 at 17:14


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.














  • see unix.stackexchange.com/q/7446/22142 or unix.stackexchange.com/q/420927/22142 or unix.stackexchange.com/q/281794/22142 or unix.stackexchange.com/q/26474/22142 etc
    – don_crissti
    Aug 13 at 15:37










  • "easier to manipulate in a script" may translate to wanting the files in the same order, in which case you may want leading zeroes?
    – Jeff Schaller
    Aug 13 at 15:41










  • Well, not really, they could even be shuffled, don't matter.
    – user305251
    Aug 13 at 15:43










  • are the "2 3 4 5" new filenames supposed to correspond to the leading part of the originals? or just start at 2 arbitrarily?
    – Jeff Schaller
    Aug 13 at 15:44










  • Could even start arbitrary, they will be shuffled in next stage of work anyway
    – user305251
    Aug 13 at 15:45














up vote
0
down vote

favorite













This question already has an answer here:



  • Batch rename files to a sequential numbering

    5 answers



I have bunch of files in one directory, like these:



0002.b3120c4bcbf3101e661161ee7efcb8bf
0003.acfc5ad94bbd27118a0d8685d18c89dd
0004.e8d5727378ddde5c3be181df593f1712
0005.8c3b9e9c0f3f183ddaf7592a11b99957


And so on...



And I want to rename them to something easier to manipulate in a script:



2
3
4
5


And so on...



How to do it in Linux shell or script?






bash shell-script files rename







share|improve this question















marked as duplicate by Jeff Schaller, schily, Community♦ Aug 13 at 17:14


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.














  • see unix.stackexchange.com/q/7446/22142 or unix.stackexchange.com/q/420927/22142 or unix.stackexchange.com/q/281794/22142 or unix.stackexchange.com/q/26474/22142 etc
    – don_crissti
    Aug 13 at 15:37










  • "easier to manipulate in a script" may translate to wanting the files in the same order, in which case you may want leading zeroes?
    – Jeff Schaller
    Aug 13 at 15:41










  • Well, not really, they could even be shuffled, don't matter.
    – user305251
    Aug 13 at 15:43










  • are the "2 3 4 5" new filenames supposed to correspond to the leading part of the originals? or just start at 2 arbitrarily?
    – Jeff Schaller
    Aug 13 at 15:44










  • Could even start arbitrary, they will be shuffled in next stage of work anyway
    – user305251
    Aug 13 at 15:45












up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite












This question already has an answer here:



  • Batch rename files to a sequential numbering

    5 answers



I have bunch of files in one directory, like these:



0002.b3120c4bcbf3101e661161ee7efcb8bf
0003.acfc5ad94bbd27118a0d8685d18c89dd
0004.e8d5727378ddde5c3be181df593f1712
0005.8c3b9e9c0f3f183ddaf7592a11b99957


And so on...



And I want to rename them to something easier to manipulate in a script:



2
3
4
5


And so on...



How to do it in Linux shell or script?






bash shell-script files rename







share|improve this question
















This question already has an answer here:



  • Batch rename files to a sequential numbering

    5 answers



I have bunch of files in one directory, like these:



0002.b3120c4bcbf3101e661161ee7efcb8bf
0003.acfc5ad94bbd27118a0d8685d18c89dd
0004.e8d5727378ddde5c3be181df593f1712
0005.8c3b9e9c0f3f183ddaf7592a11b99957


And so on...



And I want to rename them to something easier to manipulate in a script:



2
3
4
5


And so on...



How to do it in Linux shell or script?





This question already has an answer here:



  • Batch rename files to a sequential numbering

    5 answers






bash shell-script files rename




bash shell-script files rename






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Aug 13 at 15:43









Jeff Schaller

32.6k849110




32.6k849110










asked Aug 13 at 15:27









user305251

11




11




marked as duplicate by Jeff Schaller, schily, Community♦ Aug 13 at 17:14


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.






marked as duplicate by Jeff Schaller, schily, Community♦ Aug 13 at 17:14


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.













  • see unix.stackexchange.com/q/7446/22142 or unix.stackexchange.com/q/420927/22142 or unix.stackexchange.com/q/281794/22142 or unix.stackexchange.com/q/26474/22142 etc
    – don_crissti
    Aug 13 at 15:37










  • "easier to manipulate in a script" may translate to wanting the files in the same order, in which case you may want leading zeroes?
    – Jeff Schaller
    Aug 13 at 15:41










  • Well, not really, they could even be shuffled, don't matter.
    – user305251
    Aug 13 at 15:43










  • are the "2 3 4 5" new filenames supposed to correspond to the leading part of the originals? or just start at 2 arbitrarily?
    – Jeff Schaller
    Aug 13 at 15:44










  • Could even start arbitrary, they will be shuffled in next stage of work anyway
    – user305251
    Aug 13 at 15:45
















  • see unix.stackexchange.com/q/7446/22142 or unix.stackexchange.com/q/420927/22142 or unix.stackexchange.com/q/281794/22142 or unix.stackexchange.com/q/26474/22142 etc
    – don_crissti
    Aug 13 at 15:37










  • "easier to manipulate in a script" may translate to wanting the files in the same order, in which case you may want leading zeroes?
    – Jeff Schaller
    Aug 13 at 15:41










  • Well, not really, they could even be shuffled, don't matter.
    – user305251
    Aug 13 at 15:43










  • are the "2 3 4 5" new filenames supposed to correspond to the leading part of the originals? or just start at 2 arbitrarily?
    – Jeff Schaller
    Aug 13 at 15:44










  • Could even start arbitrary, they will be shuffled in next stage of work anyway
    – user305251
    Aug 13 at 15:45















see unix.stackexchange.com/q/7446/22142 or unix.stackexchange.com/q/420927/22142 or unix.stackexchange.com/q/281794/22142 or unix.stackexchange.com/q/26474/22142 etc
– don_crissti
Aug 13 at 15:37




see unix.stackexchange.com/q/7446/22142 or unix.stackexchange.com/q/420927/22142 or unix.stackexchange.com/q/281794/22142 or unix.stackexchange.com/q/26474/22142 etc
– don_crissti
Aug 13 at 15:37












"easier to manipulate in a script" may translate to wanting the files in the same order, in which case you may want leading zeroes?
– Jeff Schaller
Aug 13 at 15:41




"easier to manipulate in a script" may translate to wanting the files in the same order, in which case you may want leading zeroes?
– Jeff Schaller
Aug 13 at 15:41












Well, not really, they could even be shuffled, don't matter.
– user305251
Aug 13 at 15:43




Well, not really, they could even be shuffled, don't matter.
– user305251
Aug 13 at 15:43












are the "2 3 4 5" new filenames supposed to correspond to the leading part of the originals? or just start at 2 arbitrarily?
– Jeff Schaller
Aug 13 at 15:44




are the "2 3 4 5" new filenames supposed to correspond to the leading part of the originals? or just start at 2 arbitrarily?
– Jeff Schaller
Aug 13 at 15:44












Could even start arbitrary, they will be shuffled in next stage of work anyway
– user305251
Aug 13 at 15:45




Could even start arbitrary, they will be shuffled in next stage of work anyway
– user305251
Aug 13 at 15:45










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
-2
down vote













Thanks to the second link (Batch rename files to a sequential numbering) provided by @don_crissti in the first comment, problem solved.
Cheers.






share|improve this answer






















  • Two downgrades! LOL
    – user305251
    Aug 13 at 17:15

















1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
-2
down vote













Thanks to the second link (Batch rename files to a sequential numbering) provided by @don_crissti in the first comment, problem solved.
Cheers.






share|improve this answer






















  • Two downgrades! LOL
    – user305251
    Aug 13 at 17:15














up vote
-2
down vote













Thanks to the second link (Batch rename files to a sequential numbering) provided by @don_crissti in the first comment, problem solved.
Cheers.






share|improve this answer






















  • Two downgrades! LOL
    – user305251
    Aug 13 at 17:15












up vote
-2
down vote










up vote
-2
down vote









Thanks to the second link (Batch rename files to a sequential numbering) provided by @don_crissti in the first comment, problem solved.
Cheers.






share|improve this answer














Thanks to the second link (Batch rename files to a sequential numbering) provided by @don_crissti in the first comment, problem solved.
Cheers.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Aug 13 at 16:17

























answered Aug 13 at 16:01









user305251

11




11











  • Two downgrades! LOL
    – user305251
    Aug 13 at 17:15
















  • Two downgrades! LOL
    – user305251
    Aug 13 at 17:15















Two downgrades! LOL
– user305251
Aug 13 at 17:15




Two downgrades! LOL
– user305251
Aug 13 at 17:15


-

Popular posts from this blog

How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

Image
Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 1 down vote favorite I'm using WordPress 4.9.8, CiviCRM to 5.5.1, I usually send email to contact by Search> Find contacts View contact details Action> Send email Send email ok, Contact received mail ok like picture But status only Email sent though contact read email or not. So, can CiviCRM can change status to Email read when contact read email? wordpress email share | improve this question asked Sep 26 at 0:12 ToanLuong 49 9 add a comment  |  up vote 1 down vote favorite I'm using WordPress 4.9.8, CiviCRM to 5.5.1, I usually send email to contact by Search> Find contacts View contact details Action> Send email Send email ok, Contact received mail ok like picture But status only Email sent though contact read email or not. So, can CiviCRM can change status to Email read when contact read email? wordpress email share | improve this questi...
Read more

Displaying single band from multi-band raster using QGIS

Image
Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP 1 How can I extract a single band from multi-band raster in QGIS? I have an remote sensed image which has 6 bands (including NDVI band), I want to display each band separately, but have no idea how to do. I have seen some questions similar here but none worked for me. The original image (has 6 bands) is: I want to display the band 6 which should be like this: But I tried gdal_translate, and couldn't get the correct result. What I have got is: qgis raster multi-band share | improve this question edited Mar 5 at 0:53 Summer asked Mar 4 at 6:42 Summer Summer 23 6 Is this any help gis.stackexchange.com/questions/220658/… ? if not gis.stackexchange.com/questions/62133/… might help. – Michael Stimson Mar 4 at 6:46 Thanks for answering but when I used gdal_translate, qgis showed that 'Error 4: Kayena.tif: No such file or directory". Would you know how to fi...
Read more

How many registers does an x86_64 CPU actually have?

Image
Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 2 down vote favorite I am currently learning reverse engineering and am studying the flags register. I had in my mind that rflags was just another name for one of the 16 general purpose registers, for example rax or rbx . But it looks like rflags is actually an additional register. So that makes 17 registers in total... how many more could there be? I have spent at least an hour on this and found numerous different answers. The best answer so far is this, which says that there are 40 registers in total. 16 General Purpose Registers 2 Status Registers 6 Code Segment Registers 16 SSE Registers 8 FPU/MMX Registers But if I add that up, I get 48. Could anybody provide an official answer on how many registers an x86_64 CPU has (e.g. an Intel i7). Additionally, I have seen references to 'hardware' and 'architectural' registers. What are those registers and how many are there? register x86-64 share | improve this...
Read more