Increase the space between numerator and denominator

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP












4















I have created two fractions (see example below), but the denominator is a little too close to the division bar. Can I change this somehow?



documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath

begindocument
Combining two Gaussians with mean $mu_1, mu_2$ and variance $sigma_1^2, sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian with mean $mu = fracsigma_2^2 mu_1 + sigma_1^2 mu_2sigma_1^2 + sigma_2^2$ and variance $sigma^2 = frac1frac1sigma_1^2 + frac1sigma_2^2$
enddocument









share|improve this question

















  • 3





    Use dfrac instead of frac.

    – JouleV
    Mar 8 at 11:02











  • You could add a vphantom command (for examle vphantomA^A^A) in the beginning of each problematic dominator, and keep the style as inline math.

    – koleygr
    Mar 8 at 11:06
















4















I have created two fractions (see example below), but the denominator is a little too close to the division bar. Can I change this somehow?



documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath

begindocument
Combining two Gaussians with mean $mu_1, mu_2$ and variance $sigma_1^2, sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian with mean $mu = fracsigma_2^2 mu_1 + sigma_1^2 mu_2sigma_1^2 + sigma_2^2$ and variance $sigma^2 = frac1frac1sigma_1^2 + frac1sigma_2^2$
enddocument









share|improve this question

















  • 3





    Use dfrac instead of frac.

    – JouleV
    Mar 8 at 11:02











  • You could add a vphantom command (for examle vphantomA^A^A) in the beginning of each problematic dominator, and keep the style as inline math.

    – koleygr
    Mar 8 at 11:06














4












4








4








I have created two fractions (see example below), but the denominator is a little too close to the division bar. Can I change this somehow?



documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath

begindocument
Combining two Gaussians with mean $mu_1, mu_2$ and variance $sigma_1^2, sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian with mean $mu = fracsigma_2^2 mu_1 + sigma_1^2 mu_2sigma_1^2 + sigma_2^2$ and variance $sigma^2 = frac1frac1sigma_1^2 + frac1sigma_2^2$
enddocument









share|improve this question














I have created two fractions (see example below), but the denominator is a little too close to the division bar. Can I change this somehow?



documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath

begindocument
Combining two Gaussians with mean $mu_1, mu_2$ and variance $sigma_1^2, sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian with mean $mu = fracsigma_2^2 mu_1 + sigma_1^2 mu_2sigma_1^2 + sigma_2^2$ and variance $sigma^2 = frac1frac1sigma_1^2 + frac1sigma_2^2$
enddocument






fractions






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Mar 8 at 10:59









user503842user503842

1206




1206







  • 3





    Use dfrac instead of frac.

    – JouleV
    Mar 8 at 11:02











  • You could add a vphantom command (for examle vphantomA^A^A) in the beginning of each problematic dominator, and keep the style as inline math.

    – koleygr
    Mar 8 at 11:06













  • 3





    Use dfrac instead of frac.

    – JouleV
    Mar 8 at 11:02











  • You could add a vphantom command (for examle vphantomA^A^A) in the beginning of each problematic dominator, and keep the style as inline math.

    – koleygr
    Mar 8 at 11:06








3




3





Use dfrac instead of frac.

– JouleV
Mar 8 at 11:02





Use dfrac instead of frac.

– JouleV
Mar 8 at 11:02













You could add a vphantom command (for examle vphantomA^A^A) in the beginning of each problematic dominator, and keep the style as inline math.

– koleygr
Mar 8 at 11:06






You could add a vphantom command (for examle vphantomA^A^A) in the beginning of each problematic dominator, and keep the style as inline math.

– koleygr
Mar 8 at 11:06











2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















6














You have two main options:



  • Switch from frac......-notation to inline-fraction notation


  • Switch to display math to typeset the formulas for mu and sigma^2.


enter image description here



documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath % for "text" macro
begindocument

noindent
1. OP's original version:

Combining two Gaussians with mean $mu_1, mu_2$ and variance $sigma_1^2, sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian with mean $mu = fracsigma_2^2 mu_1 + sigma_1^2 mu_2sigma_1^2 + sigma_2^2$ and variance $sigma^2 = frac1frac1sigma_1^2 + frac1sigma_2^2$.

medskipnoindent
2. Partial switch to inline-math notation

Combining two Gaussians with mean $mu_1, mu_2$ and variance
$sigma_1^2, sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian with mean
$mu = fracsigma_2^2 mu_1 + sigma_1^2 mu_2sigma_1^2 + sigma_2^2$
and variance $sigma^2 = frac11/sigma_1^2 + 1/sigma_2^2$.

medskipnoindent
3. Full switch to inline math notation

Combining two Gaussians with means $mu_1$ and $mu_2$ and
variances $sigma_1^2$ and $sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian
with mean $mu = (sigma_2^2 mu_1 + sigma_1^2 mu_2)/(sigma_1^2 +
sigma_2^2)$ and variance $sigma^2 = 1/(1/sigma_1^2 + 1/sigma_2^2)$.

medskipnoindent
4. Switch to display math

Combining two Gaussians with means $mu_1$ and $mu_2$ and
variances $sigma_1^2$ and $sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian
with mean $mu$ and variance $sigma^2$ given by
[
mu=fracsigma_2^2 mu_1 + sigma_1^2 mu_2sigma_1^2 + sigma_2^2
quadtextandquad
sigma^2 = frac11/sigma_1^2 + 1/sigma_2^2,.
]

enddocument





share|improve this answer

























  • everymathdisplaystyle would be an additional option (Just in case that the document can afford such thing.) Of course I would not use it often, but have used in special cases that looked ok. (+1)

    – koleygr
    Mar 8 at 11:23







  • 1





    @koleygr - Unless the paragraph in question is double-spaced (and hence already damaged beyond repair, typographically speaking), typesetting a dfrac expression in running text must surely be a high crime against all known forms of decent typography. :-) If you doubt this claim, just look at the outputs of Sebastiano's and Steven's solutions...

    – Mico
    Mar 8 at 11:27






  • 1





    Thanks for the info, I also didn't like these kind of solutions but just added the comment in order to propose a more general answer for every case. But of course you are right!

    – koleygr
    Mar 8 at 11:30






  • 1





    went for the last option. Thx, Mico!

    – user503842
    Mar 8 at 11:38


















4














Here, I preserve the fraction in its native textstyle, but add a (default) 1pt buffer above and below the numerator and denominator of each fraction, which can be changed with an optional argument. I call it qfrac. The MWE shows before and after.



documentclassarticle
usepackagestackengine,scalerel
stackMath
newcommandqfrac[3][1pt]frac%
ThisStyleaddstackgap[#1]SavedStyle#2%
ThisStyleaddstackgap[#1]SavedStyle#3%

usepackageamsmath

begindocument
Combining two Gaussians with mean $mu_1, mu_2$ and variance $sigma_1^2,
sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian with mean $mu = fracsigma_2^2 mu_1 +
sigma_1^2 mu_2sigma_1^2 + sigma_2^2$ and variance $sigma^2 =
frac1frac1sigma_1^2 + frac1sigma_2^2$

Combining two Gaussians with mean $mu_1, mu_2$ and variance $sigma_1^2,
sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian with mean $mu = qfracsigma_2^2 mu_1 +
sigma_1^2 mu_2sigma_1^2 + sigma_2^2$ and variance $sigma^2 =
qfrac[.5pt]1qfrac1sigma_1^2 + qfrac1sigma_2^2$
enddocument


enter image description here






share|improve this answer




















  • 1





    (+1)... I would add your "1pt" inside an extra optional argument of the command.

    – koleygr
    Mar 8 at 11:18











  • @koleygr Excellent idea. Thanks

    – Steven B. Segletes
    Mar 8 at 11:19












  • Nice answer... Straightforward to the OP's problem. Welcome.

    – koleygr
    Mar 8 at 11:21












Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f478396%2fincrease-the-space-between-numerator-and-denominator%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









6














You have two main options:



  • Switch from frac......-notation to inline-fraction notation


  • Switch to display math to typeset the formulas for mu and sigma^2.


enter image description here



documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath % for "text" macro
begindocument

noindent
1. OP's original version:

Combining two Gaussians with mean $mu_1, mu_2$ and variance $sigma_1^2, sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian with mean $mu = fracsigma_2^2 mu_1 + sigma_1^2 mu_2sigma_1^2 + sigma_2^2$ and variance $sigma^2 = frac1frac1sigma_1^2 + frac1sigma_2^2$.

medskipnoindent
2. Partial switch to inline-math notation

Combining two Gaussians with mean $mu_1, mu_2$ and variance
$sigma_1^2, sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian with mean
$mu = fracsigma_2^2 mu_1 + sigma_1^2 mu_2sigma_1^2 + sigma_2^2$
and variance $sigma^2 = frac11/sigma_1^2 + 1/sigma_2^2$.

medskipnoindent
3. Full switch to inline math notation

Combining two Gaussians with means $mu_1$ and $mu_2$ and
variances $sigma_1^2$ and $sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian
with mean $mu = (sigma_2^2 mu_1 + sigma_1^2 mu_2)/(sigma_1^2 +
sigma_2^2)$ and variance $sigma^2 = 1/(1/sigma_1^2 + 1/sigma_2^2)$.

medskipnoindent
4. Switch to display math

Combining two Gaussians with means $mu_1$ and $mu_2$ and
variances $sigma_1^2$ and $sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian
with mean $mu$ and variance $sigma^2$ given by
[
mu=fracsigma_2^2 mu_1 + sigma_1^2 mu_2sigma_1^2 + sigma_2^2
quadtextandquad
sigma^2 = frac11/sigma_1^2 + 1/sigma_2^2,.
]

enddocument





share|improve this answer

























  • everymathdisplaystyle would be an additional option (Just in case that the document can afford such thing.) Of course I would not use it often, but have used in special cases that looked ok. (+1)

    – koleygr
    Mar 8 at 11:23







  • 1





    @koleygr - Unless the paragraph in question is double-spaced (and hence already damaged beyond repair, typographically speaking), typesetting a dfrac expression in running text must surely be a high crime against all known forms of decent typography. :-) If you doubt this claim, just look at the outputs of Sebastiano's and Steven's solutions...

    – Mico
    Mar 8 at 11:27






  • 1





    Thanks for the info, I also didn't like these kind of solutions but just added the comment in order to propose a more general answer for every case. But of course you are right!

    – koleygr
    Mar 8 at 11:30






  • 1





    went for the last option. Thx, Mico!

    – user503842
    Mar 8 at 11:38















6














You have two main options:



  • Switch from frac......-notation to inline-fraction notation


  • Switch to display math to typeset the formulas for mu and sigma^2.


enter image description here



documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath % for "text" macro
begindocument

noindent
1. OP's original version:

Combining two Gaussians with mean $mu_1, mu_2$ and variance $sigma_1^2, sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian with mean $mu = fracsigma_2^2 mu_1 + sigma_1^2 mu_2sigma_1^2 + sigma_2^2$ and variance $sigma^2 = frac1frac1sigma_1^2 + frac1sigma_2^2$.

medskipnoindent
2. Partial switch to inline-math notation

Combining two Gaussians with mean $mu_1, mu_2$ and variance
$sigma_1^2, sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian with mean
$mu = fracsigma_2^2 mu_1 + sigma_1^2 mu_2sigma_1^2 + sigma_2^2$
and variance $sigma^2 = frac11/sigma_1^2 + 1/sigma_2^2$.

medskipnoindent
3. Full switch to inline math notation

Combining two Gaussians with means $mu_1$ and $mu_2$ and
variances $sigma_1^2$ and $sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian
with mean $mu = (sigma_2^2 mu_1 + sigma_1^2 mu_2)/(sigma_1^2 +
sigma_2^2)$ and variance $sigma^2 = 1/(1/sigma_1^2 + 1/sigma_2^2)$.

medskipnoindent
4. Switch to display math

Combining two Gaussians with means $mu_1$ and $mu_2$ and
variances $sigma_1^2$ and $sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian
with mean $mu$ and variance $sigma^2$ given by
[
mu=fracsigma_2^2 mu_1 + sigma_1^2 mu_2sigma_1^2 + sigma_2^2
quadtextandquad
sigma^2 = frac11/sigma_1^2 + 1/sigma_2^2,.
]

enddocument





share|improve this answer

























  • everymathdisplaystyle would be an additional option (Just in case that the document can afford such thing.) Of course I would not use it often, but have used in special cases that looked ok. (+1)

    – koleygr
    Mar 8 at 11:23







  • 1





    @koleygr - Unless the paragraph in question is double-spaced (and hence already damaged beyond repair, typographically speaking), typesetting a dfrac expression in running text must surely be a high crime against all known forms of decent typography. :-) If you doubt this claim, just look at the outputs of Sebastiano's and Steven's solutions...

    – Mico
    Mar 8 at 11:27






  • 1





    Thanks for the info, I also didn't like these kind of solutions but just added the comment in order to propose a more general answer for every case. But of course you are right!

    – koleygr
    Mar 8 at 11:30






  • 1





    went for the last option. Thx, Mico!

    – user503842
    Mar 8 at 11:38













6












6








6







You have two main options:



  • Switch from frac......-notation to inline-fraction notation


  • Switch to display math to typeset the formulas for mu and sigma^2.


enter image description here



documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath % for "text" macro
begindocument

noindent
1. OP's original version:

Combining two Gaussians with mean $mu_1, mu_2$ and variance $sigma_1^2, sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian with mean $mu = fracsigma_2^2 mu_1 + sigma_1^2 mu_2sigma_1^2 + sigma_2^2$ and variance $sigma^2 = frac1frac1sigma_1^2 + frac1sigma_2^2$.

medskipnoindent
2. Partial switch to inline-math notation

Combining two Gaussians with mean $mu_1, mu_2$ and variance
$sigma_1^2, sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian with mean
$mu = fracsigma_2^2 mu_1 + sigma_1^2 mu_2sigma_1^2 + sigma_2^2$
and variance $sigma^2 = frac11/sigma_1^2 + 1/sigma_2^2$.

medskipnoindent
3. Full switch to inline math notation

Combining two Gaussians with means $mu_1$ and $mu_2$ and
variances $sigma_1^2$ and $sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian
with mean $mu = (sigma_2^2 mu_1 + sigma_1^2 mu_2)/(sigma_1^2 +
sigma_2^2)$ and variance $sigma^2 = 1/(1/sigma_1^2 + 1/sigma_2^2)$.

medskipnoindent
4. Switch to display math

Combining two Gaussians with means $mu_1$ and $mu_2$ and
variances $sigma_1^2$ and $sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian
with mean $mu$ and variance $sigma^2$ given by
[
mu=fracsigma_2^2 mu_1 + sigma_1^2 mu_2sigma_1^2 + sigma_2^2
quadtextandquad
sigma^2 = frac11/sigma_1^2 + 1/sigma_2^2,.
]

enddocument





share|improve this answer















You have two main options:



  • Switch from frac......-notation to inline-fraction notation


  • Switch to display math to typeset the formulas for mu and sigma^2.


enter image description here



documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath % for "text" macro
begindocument

noindent
1. OP's original version:

Combining two Gaussians with mean $mu_1, mu_2$ and variance $sigma_1^2, sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian with mean $mu = fracsigma_2^2 mu_1 + sigma_1^2 mu_2sigma_1^2 + sigma_2^2$ and variance $sigma^2 = frac1frac1sigma_1^2 + frac1sigma_2^2$.

medskipnoindent
2. Partial switch to inline-math notation

Combining two Gaussians with mean $mu_1, mu_2$ and variance
$sigma_1^2, sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian with mean
$mu = fracsigma_2^2 mu_1 + sigma_1^2 mu_2sigma_1^2 + sigma_2^2$
and variance $sigma^2 = frac11/sigma_1^2 + 1/sigma_2^2$.

medskipnoindent
3. Full switch to inline math notation

Combining two Gaussians with means $mu_1$ and $mu_2$ and
variances $sigma_1^2$ and $sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian
with mean $mu = (sigma_2^2 mu_1 + sigma_1^2 mu_2)/(sigma_1^2 +
sigma_2^2)$ and variance $sigma^2 = 1/(1/sigma_1^2 + 1/sigma_2^2)$.

medskipnoindent
4. Switch to display math

Combining two Gaussians with means $mu_1$ and $mu_2$ and
variances $sigma_1^2$ and $sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian
with mean $mu$ and variance $sigma^2$ given by
[
mu=fracsigma_2^2 mu_1 + sigma_1^2 mu_2sigma_1^2 + sigma_2^2
quadtextandquad
sigma^2 = frac11/sigma_1^2 + 1/sigma_2^2,.
]

enddocument






share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Mar 8 at 22:20

























answered Mar 8 at 11:17









MicoMico

285k31388778




285k31388778












  • everymathdisplaystyle would be an additional option (Just in case that the document can afford such thing.) Of course I would not use it often, but have used in special cases that looked ok. (+1)

    – koleygr
    Mar 8 at 11:23







  • 1





    @koleygr - Unless the paragraph in question is double-spaced (and hence already damaged beyond repair, typographically speaking), typesetting a dfrac expression in running text must surely be a high crime against all known forms of decent typography. :-) If you doubt this claim, just look at the outputs of Sebastiano's and Steven's solutions...

    – Mico
    Mar 8 at 11:27






  • 1





    Thanks for the info, I also didn't like these kind of solutions but just added the comment in order to propose a more general answer for every case. But of course you are right!

    – koleygr
    Mar 8 at 11:30






  • 1





    went for the last option. Thx, Mico!

    – user503842
    Mar 8 at 11:38

















  • everymathdisplaystyle would be an additional option (Just in case that the document can afford such thing.) Of course I would not use it often, but have used in special cases that looked ok. (+1)

    – koleygr
    Mar 8 at 11:23







  • 1





    @koleygr - Unless the paragraph in question is double-spaced (and hence already damaged beyond repair, typographically speaking), typesetting a dfrac expression in running text must surely be a high crime against all known forms of decent typography. :-) If you doubt this claim, just look at the outputs of Sebastiano's and Steven's solutions...

    – Mico
    Mar 8 at 11:27






  • 1





    Thanks for the info, I also didn't like these kind of solutions but just added the comment in order to propose a more general answer for every case. But of course you are right!

    – koleygr
    Mar 8 at 11:30






  • 1





    went for the last option. Thx, Mico!

    – user503842
    Mar 8 at 11:38
















everymathdisplaystyle would be an additional option (Just in case that the document can afford such thing.) Of course I would not use it often, but have used in special cases that looked ok. (+1)

– koleygr
Mar 8 at 11:23






everymathdisplaystyle would be an additional option (Just in case that the document can afford such thing.) Of course I would not use it often, but have used in special cases that looked ok. (+1)

– koleygr
Mar 8 at 11:23





1




1





@koleygr - Unless the paragraph in question is double-spaced (and hence already damaged beyond repair, typographically speaking), typesetting a dfrac expression in running text must surely be a high crime against all known forms of decent typography. :-) If you doubt this claim, just look at the outputs of Sebastiano's and Steven's solutions...

– Mico
Mar 8 at 11:27





@koleygr - Unless the paragraph in question is double-spaced (and hence already damaged beyond repair, typographically speaking), typesetting a dfrac expression in running text must surely be a high crime against all known forms of decent typography. :-) If you doubt this claim, just look at the outputs of Sebastiano's and Steven's solutions...

– Mico
Mar 8 at 11:27




1




1





Thanks for the info, I also didn't like these kind of solutions but just added the comment in order to propose a more general answer for every case. But of course you are right!

– koleygr
Mar 8 at 11:30





Thanks for the info, I also didn't like these kind of solutions but just added the comment in order to propose a more general answer for every case. But of course you are right!

– koleygr
Mar 8 at 11:30




1




1





went for the last option. Thx, Mico!

– user503842
Mar 8 at 11:38





went for the last option. Thx, Mico!

– user503842
Mar 8 at 11:38











4














Here, I preserve the fraction in its native textstyle, but add a (default) 1pt buffer above and below the numerator and denominator of each fraction, which can be changed with an optional argument. I call it qfrac. The MWE shows before and after.



documentclassarticle
usepackagestackengine,scalerel
stackMath
newcommandqfrac[3][1pt]frac%
ThisStyleaddstackgap[#1]SavedStyle#2%
ThisStyleaddstackgap[#1]SavedStyle#3%

usepackageamsmath

begindocument
Combining two Gaussians with mean $mu_1, mu_2$ and variance $sigma_1^2,
sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian with mean $mu = fracsigma_2^2 mu_1 +
sigma_1^2 mu_2sigma_1^2 + sigma_2^2$ and variance $sigma^2 =
frac1frac1sigma_1^2 + frac1sigma_2^2$

Combining two Gaussians with mean $mu_1, mu_2$ and variance $sigma_1^2,
sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian with mean $mu = qfracsigma_2^2 mu_1 +
sigma_1^2 mu_2sigma_1^2 + sigma_2^2$ and variance $sigma^2 =
qfrac[.5pt]1qfrac1sigma_1^2 + qfrac1sigma_2^2$
enddocument


enter image description here






share|improve this answer




















  • 1





    (+1)... I would add your "1pt" inside an extra optional argument of the command.

    – koleygr
    Mar 8 at 11:18











  • @koleygr Excellent idea. Thanks

    – Steven B. Segletes
    Mar 8 at 11:19












  • Nice answer... Straightforward to the OP's problem. Welcome.

    – koleygr
    Mar 8 at 11:21
















4














Here, I preserve the fraction in its native textstyle, but add a (default) 1pt buffer above and below the numerator and denominator of each fraction, which can be changed with an optional argument. I call it qfrac. The MWE shows before and after.



documentclassarticle
usepackagestackengine,scalerel
stackMath
newcommandqfrac[3][1pt]frac%
ThisStyleaddstackgap[#1]SavedStyle#2%
ThisStyleaddstackgap[#1]SavedStyle#3%

usepackageamsmath

begindocument
Combining two Gaussians with mean $mu_1, mu_2$ and variance $sigma_1^2,
sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian with mean $mu = fracsigma_2^2 mu_1 +
sigma_1^2 mu_2sigma_1^2 + sigma_2^2$ and variance $sigma^2 =
frac1frac1sigma_1^2 + frac1sigma_2^2$

Combining two Gaussians with mean $mu_1, mu_2$ and variance $sigma_1^2,
sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian with mean $mu = qfracsigma_2^2 mu_1 +
sigma_1^2 mu_2sigma_1^2 + sigma_2^2$ and variance $sigma^2 =
qfrac[.5pt]1qfrac1sigma_1^2 + qfrac1sigma_2^2$
enddocument


enter image description here






share|improve this answer




















  • 1





    (+1)... I would add your "1pt" inside an extra optional argument of the command.

    – koleygr
    Mar 8 at 11:18











  • @koleygr Excellent idea. Thanks

    – Steven B. Segletes
    Mar 8 at 11:19












  • Nice answer... Straightforward to the OP's problem. Welcome.

    – koleygr
    Mar 8 at 11:21














4












4








4







Here, I preserve the fraction in its native textstyle, but add a (default) 1pt buffer above and below the numerator and denominator of each fraction, which can be changed with an optional argument. I call it qfrac. The MWE shows before and after.



documentclassarticle
usepackagestackengine,scalerel
stackMath
newcommandqfrac[3][1pt]frac%
ThisStyleaddstackgap[#1]SavedStyle#2%
ThisStyleaddstackgap[#1]SavedStyle#3%

usepackageamsmath

begindocument
Combining two Gaussians with mean $mu_1, mu_2$ and variance $sigma_1^2,
sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian with mean $mu = fracsigma_2^2 mu_1 +
sigma_1^2 mu_2sigma_1^2 + sigma_2^2$ and variance $sigma^2 =
frac1frac1sigma_1^2 + frac1sigma_2^2$

Combining two Gaussians with mean $mu_1, mu_2$ and variance $sigma_1^2,
sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian with mean $mu = qfracsigma_2^2 mu_1 +
sigma_1^2 mu_2sigma_1^2 + sigma_2^2$ and variance $sigma^2 =
qfrac[.5pt]1qfrac1sigma_1^2 + qfrac1sigma_2^2$
enddocument


enter image description here






share|improve this answer















Here, I preserve the fraction in its native textstyle, but add a (default) 1pt buffer above and below the numerator and denominator of each fraction, which can be changed with an optional argument. I call it qfrac. The MWE shows before and after.



documentclassarticle
usepackagestackengine,scalerel
stackMath
newcommandqfrac[3][1pt]frac%
ThisStyleaddstackgap[#1]SavedStyle#2%
ThisStyleaddstackgap[#1]SavedStyle#3%

usepackageamsmath

begindocument
Combining two Gaussians with mean $mu_1, mu_2$ and variance $sigma_1^2,
sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian with mean $mu = fracsigma_2^2 mu_1 +
sigma_1^2 mu_2sigma_1^2 + sigma_2^2$ and variance $sigma^2 =
frac1frac1sigma_1^2 + frac1sigma_2^2$

Combining two Gaussians with mean $mu_1, mu_2$ and variance $sigma_1^2,
sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian with mean $mu = qfracsigma_2^2 mu_1 +
sigma_1^2 mu_2sigma_1^2 + sigma_2^2$ and variance $sigma^2 =
qfrac[.5pt]1qfrac1sigma_1^2 + qfrac1sigma_2^2$
enddocument


enter image description here







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Mar 8 at 11:22

























answered Mar 8 at 11:16









Steven B. SegletesSteven B. Segletes

161k9205416




161k9205416







  • 1





    (+1)... I would add your "1pt" inside an extra optional argument of the command.

    – koleygr
    Mar 8 at 11:18











  • @koleygr Excellent idea. Thanks

    – Steven B. Segletes
    Mar 8 at 11:19












  • Nice answer... Straightforward to the OP's problem. Welcome.

    – koleygr
    Mar 8 at 11:21













  • 1





    (+1)... I would add your "1pt" inside an extra optional argument of the command.

    – koleygr
    Mar 8 at 11:18











  • @koleygr Excellent idea. Thanks

    – Steven B. Segletes
    Mar 8 at 11:19












  • Nice answer... Straightforward to the OP's problem. Welcome.

    – koleygr
    Mar 8 at 11:21








1




1





(+1)... I would add your "1pt" inside an extra optional argument of the command.

– koleygr
Mar 8 at 11:18





(+1)... I would add your "1pt" inside an extra optional argument of the command.

– koleygr
Mar 8 at 11:18













@koleygr Excellent idea. Thanks

– Steven B. Segletes
Mar 8 at 11:19






@koleygr Excellent idea. Thanks

– Steven B. Segletes
Mar 8 at 11:19














Nice answer... Straightforward to the OP's problem. Welcome.

– koleygr
Mar 8 at 11:21






Nice answer... Straightforward to the OP's problem. Welcome.

– koleygr
Mar 8 at 11:21


















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f478396%2fincrease-the-space-between-numerator-and-denominator%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown






Popular posts from this blog

How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

Displaying single band from multi-band raster using QGIS

How many registers does an x86_64 CPU actually have?