Increase the space between numerator and denominator
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
I have created two fractions (see example below), but the denominator is a little too close to the division bar. Can I change this somehow?
documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
begindocument
Combining two Gaussians with mean $mu_1, mu_2$ and variance $sigma_1^2, sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian with mean $mu = fracsigma_2^2 mu_1 + sigma_1^2 mu_2sigma_1^2 + sigma_2^2$ and variance $sigma^2 = frac1frac1sigma_1^2 + frac1sigma_2^2$
enddocument
fractions
add a comment |
I have created two fractions (see example below), but the denominator is a little too close to the division bar. Can I change this somehow?
documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
begindocument
Combining two Gaussians with mean $mu_1, mu_2$ and variance $sigma_1^2, sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian with mean $mu = fracsigma_2^2 mu_1 + sigma_1^2 mu_2sigma_1^2 + sigma_2^2$ and variance $sigma^2 = frac1frac1sigma_1^2 + frac1sigma_2^2$
enddocument
fractions
3
Usedfrac
instead offrac
.
– JouleV
Mar 8 at 11:02
You could add avphantom
command (for examlevphantomA^A^A
) in the beginning of each problematic dominator, and keep the style as inline math.
– koleygr
Mar 8 at 11:06
add a comment |
I have created two fractions (see example below), but the denominator is a little too close to the division bar. Can I change this somehow?
documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
begindocument
Combining two Gaussians with mean $mu_1, mu_2$ and variance $sigma_1^2, sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian with mean $mu = fracsigma_2^2 mu_1 + sigma_1^2 mu_2sigma_1^2 + sigma_2^2$ and variance $sigma^2 = frac1frac1sigma_1^2 + frac1sigma_2^2$
enddocument
fractions
I have created two fractions (see example below), but the denominator is a little too close to the division bar. Can I change this somehow?
documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
begindocument
Combining two Gaussians with mean $mu_1, mu_2$ and variance $sigma_1^2, sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian with mean $mu = fracsigma_2^2 mu_1 + sigma_1^2 mu_2sigma_1^2 + sigma_2^2$ and variance $sigma^2 = frac1frac1sigma_1^2 + frac1sigma_2^2$
enddocument
fractions
fractions
asked Mar 8 at 10:59
user503842user503842
1206
1206
3
Usedfrac
instead offrac
.
– JouleV
Mar 8 at 11:02
You could add avphantom
command (for examlevphantomA^A^A
) in the beginning of each problematic dominator, and keep the style as inline math.
– koleygr
Mar 8 at 11:06
add a comment |
3
Usedfrac
instead offrac
.
– JouleV
Mar 8 at 11:02
You could add avphantom
command (for examlevphantomA^A^A
) in the beginning of each problematic dominator, and keep the style as inline math.
– koleygr
Mar 8 at 11:06
3
3
Use
dfrac
instead of frac
.– JouleV
Mar 8 at 11:02
Use
dfrac
instead of frac
.– JouleV
Mar 8 at 11:02
You could add a
vphantom
command (for examle vphantomA^A^A
) in the beginning of each problematic dominator, and keep the style as inline math.– koleygr
Mar 8 at 11:06
You could add a
vphantom
command (for examle vphantomA^A^A
) in the beginning of each problematic dominator, and keep the style as inline math.– koleygr
Mar 8 at 11:06
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
You have two main options:
Switch from
frac......
-notation to inline-fraction notationSwitch to display math to typeset the formulas for
mu
andsigma^2
.
documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath % for "text" macro
begindocument
noindent
1. OP's original version:
Combining two Gaussians with mean $mu_1, mu_2$ and variance $sigma_1^2, sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian with mean $mu = fracsigma_2^2 mu_1 + sigma_1^2 mu_2sigma_1^2 + sigma_2^2$ and variance $sigma^2 = frac1frac1sigma_1^2 + frac1sigma_2^2$.
medskipnoindent
2. Partial switch to inline-math notation
Combining two Gaussians with mean $mu_1, mu_2$ and variance
$sigma_1^2, sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian with mean
$mu = fracsigma_2^2 mu_1 + sigma_1^2 mu_2sigma_1^2 + sigma_2^2$
and variance $sigma^2 = frac11/sigma_1^2 + 1/sigma_2^2$.
medskipnoindent
3. Full switch to inline math notation
Combining two Gaussians with means $mu_1$ and $mu_2$ and
variances $sigma_1^2$ and $sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian
with mean $mu = (sigma_2^2 mu_1 + sigma_1^2 mu_2)/(sigma_1^2 +
sigma_2^2)$ and variance $sigma^2 = 1/(1/sigma_1^2 + 1/sigma_2^2)$.
medskipnoindent
4. Switch to display math
Combining two Gaussians with means $mu_1$ and $mu_2$ and
variances $sigma_1^2$ and $sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian
with mean $mu$ and variance $sigma^2$ given by
[
mu=fracsigma_2^2 mu_1 + sigma_1^2 mu_2sigma_1^2 + sigma_2^2
quadtextandquad
sigma^2 = frac11/sigma_1^2 + 1/sigma_2^2,.
]
enddocument
everymathdisplaystyle
would be an additional option (Just in case that the document can afford such thing.) Of course I would not use it often, but have used in special cases that looked ok. (+1)
– koleygr
Mar 8 at 11:23
1
@koleygr - Unless the paragraph in question is double-spaced (and hence already damaged beyond repair, typographically speaking), typesetting adfrac
expression in running text must surely be a high crime against all known forms of decent typography. :-) If you doubt this claim, just look at the outputs of Sebastiano's and Steven's solutions...
– Mico
Mar 8 at 11:27
1
Thanks for the info, I also didn't like these kind of solutions but just added the comment in order to propose a more general answer for every case. But of course you are right!
– koleygr
Mar 8 at 11:30
1
went for the last option. Thx, Mico!
– user503842
Mar 8 at 11:38
add a comment |
Here, I preserve the fraction in its native textstyle
, but add a (default) 1pt buffer above and below the numerator and denominator of each fraction, which can be changed with an optional argument. I call it qfrac
. The MWE shows before and after.
documentclassarticle
usepackagestackengine,scalerel
stackMath
newcommandqfrac[3][1pt]frac%
ThisStyleaddstackgap[#1]SavedStyle#2%
ThisStyleaddstackgap[#1]SavedStyle#3%
usepackageamsmath
begindocument
Combining two Gaussians with mean $mu_1, mu_2$ and variance $sigma_1^2,
sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian with mean $mu = fracsigma_2^2 mu_1 +
sigma_1^2 mu_2sigma_1^2 + sigma_2^2$ and variance $sigma^2 =
frac1frac1sigma_1^2 + frac1sigma_2^2$
Combining two Gaussians with mean $mu_1, mu_2$ and variance $sigma_1^2,
sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian with mean $mu = qfracsigma_2^2 mu_1 +
sigma_1^2 mu_2sigma_1^2 + sigma_2^2$ and variance $sigma^2 =
qfrac[.5pt]1qfrac1sigma_1^2 + qfrac1sigma_2^2$
enddocument
1
(+1)... I would add your "1pt" inside an extra optional argument of the command.
– koleygr
Mar 8 at 11:18
@koleygr Excellent idea. Thanks
– Steven B. Segletes
Mar 8 at 11:19
Nice answer... Straightforward to the OP's problem. Welcome.
– koleygr
Mar 8 at 11:21
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f478396%2fincrease-the-space-between-numerator-and-denominator%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
You have two main options:
Switch from
frac......
-notation to inline-fraction notationSwitch to display math to typeset the formulas for
mu
andsigma^2
.
documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath % for "text" macro
begindocument
noindent
1. OP's original version:
Combining two Gaussians with mean $mu_1, mu_2$ and variance $sigma_1^2, sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian with mean $mu = fracsigma_2^2 mu_1 + sigma_1^2 mu_2sigma_1^2 + sigma_2^2$ and variance $sigma^2 = frac1frac1sigma_1^2 + frac1sigma_2^2$.
medskipnoindent
2. Partial switch to inline-math notation
Combining two Gaussians with mean $mu_1, mu_2$ and variance
$sigma_1^2, sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian with mean
$mu = fracsigma_2^2 mu_1 + sigma_1^2 mu_2sigma_1^2 + sigma_2^2$
and variance $sigma^2 = frac11/sigma_1^2 + 1/sigma_2^2$.
medskipnoindent
3. Full switch to inline math notation
Combining two Gaussians with means $mu_1$ and $mu_2$ and
variances $sigma_1^2$ and $sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian
with mean $mu = (sigma_2^2 mu_1 + sigma_1^2 mu_2)/(sigma_1^2 +
sigma_2^2)$ and variance $sigma^2 = 1/(1/sigma_1^2 + 1/sigma_2^2)$.
medskipnoindent
4. Switch to display math
Combining two Gaussians with means $mu_1$ and $mu_2$ and
variances $sigma_1^2$ and $sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian
with mean $mu$ and variance $sigma^2$ given by
[
mu=fracsigma_2^2 mu_1 + sigma_1^2 mu_2sigma_1^2 + sigma_2^2
quadtextandquad
sigma^2 = frac11/sigma_1^2 + 1/sigma_2^2,.
]
enddocument
everymathdisplaystyle
would be an additional option (Just in case that the document can afford such thing.) Of course I would not use it often, but have used in special cases that looked ok. (+1)
– koleygr
Mar 8 at 11:23
1
@koleygr - Unless the paragraph in question is double-spaced (and hence already damaged beyond repair, typographically speaking), typesetting adfrac
expression in running text must surely be a high crime against all known forms of decent typography. :-) If you doubt this claim, just look at the outputs of Sebastiano's and Steven's solutions...
– Mico
Mar 8 at 11:27
1
Thanks for the info, I also didn't like these kind of solutions but just added the comment in order to propose a more general answer for every case. But of course you are right!
– koleygr
Mar 8 at 11:30
1
went for the last option. Thx, Mico!
– user503842
Mar 8 at 11:38
add a comment |
You have two main options:
Switch from
frac......
-notation to inline-fraction notationSwitch to display math to typeset the formulas for
mu
andsigma^2
.
documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath % for "text" macro
begindocument
noindent
1. OP's original version:
Combining two Gaussians with mean $mu_1, mu_2$ and variance $sigma_1^2, sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian with mean $mu = fracsigma_2^2 mu_1 + sigma_1^2 mu_2sigma_1^2 + sigma_2^2$ and variance $sigma^2 = frac1frac1sigma_1^2 + frac1sigma_2^2$.
medskipnoindent
2. Partial switch to inline-math notation
Combining two Gaussians with mean $mu_1, mu_2$ and variance
$sigma_1^2, sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian with mean
$mu = fracsigma_2^2 mu_1 + sigma_1^2 mu_2sigma_1^2 + sigma_2^2$
and variance $sigma^2 = frac11/sigma_1^2 + 1/sigma_2^2$.
medskipnoindent
3. Full switch to inline math notation
Combining two Gaussians with means $mu_1$ and $mu_2$ and
variances $sigma_1^2$ and $sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian
with mean $mu = (sigma_2^2 mu_1 + sigma_1^2 mu_2)/(sigma_1^2 +
sigma_2^2)$ and variance $sigma^2 = 1/(1/sigma_1^2 + 1/sigma_2^2)$.
medskipnoindent
4. Switch to display math
Combining two Gaussians with means $mu_1$ and $mu_2$ and
variances $sigma_1^2$ and $sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian
with mean $mu$ and variance $sigma^2$ given by
[
mu=fracsigma_2^2 mu_1 + sigma_1^2 mu_2sigma_1^2 + sigma_2^2
quadtextandquad
sigma^2 = frac11/sigma_1^2 + 1/sigma_2^2,.
]
enddocument
everymathdisplaystyle
would be an additional option (Just in case that the document can afford such thing.) Of course I would not use it often, but have used in special cases that looked ok. (+1)
– koleygr
Mar 8 at 11:23
1
@koleygr - Unless the paragraph in question is double-spaced (and hence already damaged beyond repair, typographically speaking), typesetting adfrac
expression in running text must surely be a high crime against all known forms of decent typography. :-) If you doubt this claim, just look at the outputs of Sebastiano's and Steven's solutions...
– Mico
Mar 8 at 11:27
1
Thanks for the info, I also didn't like these kind of solutions but just added the comment in order to propose a more general answer for every case. But of course you are right!
– koleygr
Mar 8 at 11:30
1
went for the last option. Thx, Mico!
– user503842
Mar 8 at 11:38
add a comment |
You have two main options:
Switch from
frac......
-notation to inline-fraction notationSwitch to display math to typeset the formulas for
mu
andsigma^2
.
documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath % for "text" macro
begindocument
noindent
1. OP's original version:
Combining two Gaussians with mean $mu_1, mu_2$ and variance $sigma_1^2, sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian with mean $mu = fracsigma_2^2 mu_1 + sigma_1^2 mu_2sigma_1^2 + sigma_2^2$ and variance $sigma^2 = frac1frac1sigma_1^2 + frac1sigma_2^2$.
medskipnoindent
2. Partial switch to inline-math notation
Combining two Gaussians with mean $mu_1, mu_2$ and variance
$sigma_1^2, sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian with mean
$mu = fracsigma_2^2 mu_1 + sigma_1^2 mu_2sigma_1^2 + sigma_2^2$
and variance $sigma^2 = frac11/sigma_1^2 + 1/sigma_2^2$.
medskipnoindent
3. Full switch to inline math notation
Combining two Gaussians with means $mu_1$ and $mu_2$ and
variances $sigma_1^2$ and $sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian
with mean $mu = (sigma_2^2 mu_1 + sigma_1^2 mu_2)/(sigma_1^2 +
sigma_2^2)$ and variance $sigma^2 = 1/(1/sigma_1^2 + 1/sigma_2^2)$.
medskipnoindent
4. Switch to display math
Combining two Gaussians with means $mu_1$ and $mu_2$ and
variances $sigma_1^2$ and $sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian
with mean $mu$ and variance $sigma^2$ given by
[
mu=fracsigma_2^2 mu_1 + sigma_1^2 mu_2sigma_1^2 + sigma_2^2
quadtextandquad
sigma^2 = frac11/sigma_1^2 + 1/sigma_2^2,.
]
enddocument
You have two main options:
Switch from
frac......
-notation to inline-fraction notationSwitch to display math to typeset the formulas for
mu
andsigma^2
.
documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath % for "text" macro
begindocument
noindent
1. OP's original version:
Combining two Gaussians with mean $mu_1, mu_2$ and variance $sigma_1^2, sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian with mean $mu = fracsigma_2^2 mu_1 + sigma_1^2 mu_2sigma_1^2 + sigma_2^2$ and variance $sigma^2 = frac1frac1sigma_1^2 + frac1sigma_2^2$.
medskipnoindent
2. Partial switch to inline-math notation
Combining two Gaussians with mean $mu_1, mu_2$ and variance
$sigma_1^2, sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian with mean
$mu = fracsigma_2^2 mu_1 + sigma_1^2 mu_2sigma_1^2 + sigma_2^2$
and variance $sigma^2 = frac11/sigma_1^2 + 1/sigma_2^2$.
medskipnoindent
3. Full switch to inline math notation
Combining two Gaussians with means $mu_1$ and $mu_2$ and
variances $sigma_1^2$ and $sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian
with mean $mu = (sigma_2^2 mu_1 + sigma_1^2 mu_2)/(sigma_1^2 +
sigma_2^2)$ and variance $sigma^2 = 1/(1/sigma_1^2 + 1/sigma_2^2)$.
medskipnoindent
4. Switch to display math
Combining two Gaussians with means $mu_1$ and $mu_2$ and
variances $sigma_1^2$ and $sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian
with mean $mu$ and variance $sigma^2$ given by
[
mu=fracsigma_2^2 mu_1 + sigma_1^2 mu_2sigma_1^2 + sigma_2^2
quadtextandquad
sigma^2 = frac11/sigma_1^2 + 1/sigma_2^2,.
]
enddocument
edited Mar 8 at 22:20
answered Mar 8 at 11:17
MicoMico
285k31388778
285k31388778
everymathdisplaystyle
would be an additional option (Just in case that the document can afford such thing.) Of course I would not use it often, but have used in special cases that looked ok. (+1)
– koleygr
Mar 8 at 11:23
1
@koleygr - Unless the paragraph in question is double-spaced (and hence already damaged beyond repair, typographically speaking), typesetting adfrac
expression in running text must surely be a high crime against all known forms of decent typography. :-) If you doubt this claim, just look at the outputs of Sebastiano's and Steven's solutions...
– Mico
Mar 8 at 11:27
1
Thanks for the info, I also didn't like these kind of solutions but just added the comment in order to propose a more general answer for every case. But of course you are right!
– koleygr
Mar 8 at 11:30
1
went for the last option. Thx, Mico!
– user503842
Mar 8 at 11:38
add a comment |
everymathdisplaystyle
would be an additional option (Just in case that the document can afford such thing.) Of course I would not use it often, but have used in special cases that looked ok. (+1)
– koleygr
Mar 8 at 11:23
1
@koleygr - Unless the paragraph in question is double-spaced (and hence already damaged beyond repair, typographically speaking), typesetting adfrac
expression in running text must surely be a high crime against all known forms of decent typography. :-) If you doubt this claim, just look at the outputs of Sebastiano's and Steven's solutions...
– Mico
Mar 8 at 11:27
1
Thanks for the info, I also didn't like these kind of solutions but just added the comment in order to propose a more general answer for every case. But of course you are right!
– koleygr
Mar 8 at 11:30
1
went for the last option. Thx, Mico!
– user503842
Mar 8 at 11:38
everymathdisplaystyle
would be an additional option (Just in case that the document can afford such thing.) Of course I would not use it often, but have used in special cases that looked ok. (+1)– koleygr
Mar 8 at 11:23
everymathdisplaystyle
would be an additional option (Just in case that the document can afford such thing.) Of course I would not use it often, but have used in special cases that looked ok. (+1)– koleygr
Mar 8 at 11:23
1
1
@koleygr - Unless the paragraph in question is double-spaced (and hence already damaged beyond repair, typographically speaking), typesetting a
dfrac
expression in running text must surely be a high crime against all known forms of decent typography. :-) If you doubt this claim, just look at the outputs of Sebastiano's and Steven's solutions...– Mico
Mar 8 at 11:27
@koleygr - Unless the paragraph in question is double-spaced (and hence already damaged beyond repair, typographically speaking), typesetting a
dfrac
expression in running text must surely be a high crime against all known forms of decent typography. :-) If you doubt this claim, just look at the outputs of Sebastiano's and Steven's solutions...– Mico
Mar 8 at 11:27
1
1
Thanks for the info, I also didn't like these kind of solutions but just added the comment in order to propose a more general answer for every case. But of course you are right!
– koleygr
Mar 8 at 11:30
Thanks for the info, I also didn't like these kind of solutions but just added the comment in order to propose a more general answer for every case. But of course you are right!
– koleygr
Mar 8 at 11:30
1
1
went for the last option. Thx, Mico!
– user503842
Mar 8 at 11:38
went for the last option. Thx, Mico!
– user503842
Mar 8 at 11:38
add a comment |
Here, I preserve the fraction in its native textstyle
, but add a (default) 1pt buffer above and below the numerator and denominator of each fraction, which can be changed with an optional argument. I call it qfrac
. The MWE shows before and after.
documentclassarticle
usepackagestackengine,scalerel
stackMath
newcommandqfrac[3][1pt]frac%
ThisStyleaddstackgap[#1]SavedStyle#2%
ThisStyleaddstackgap[#1]SavedStyle#3%
usepackageamsmath
begindocument
Combining two Gaussians with mean $mu_1, mu_2$ and variance $sigma_1^2,
sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian with mean $mu = fracsigma_2^2 mu_1 +
sigma_1^2 mu_2sigma_1^2 + sigma_2^2$ and variance $sigma^2 =
frac1frac1sigma_1^2 + frac1sigma_2^2$
Combining two Gaussians with mean $mu_1, mu_2$ and variance $sigma_1^2,
sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian with mean $mu = qfracsigma_2^2 mu_1 +
sigma_1^2 mu_2sigma_1^2 + sigma_2^2$ and variance $sigma^2 =
qfrac[.5pt]1qfrac1sigma_1^2 + qfrac1sigma_2^2$
enddocument
1
(+1)... I would add your "1pt" inside an extra optional argument of the command.
– koleygr
Mar 8 at 11:18
@koleygr Excellent idea. Thanks
– Steven B. Segletes
Mar 8 at 11:19
Nice answer... Straightforward to the OP's problem. Welcome.
– koleygr
Mar 8 at 11:21
add a comment |
Here, I preserve the fraction in its native textstyle
, but add a (default) 1pt buffer above and below the numerator and denominator of each fraction, which can be changed with an optional argument. I call it qfrac
. The MWE shows before and after.
documentclassarticle
usepackagestackengine,scalerel
stackMath
newcommandqfrac[3][1pt]frac%
ThisStyleaddstackgap[#1]SavedStyle#2%
ThisStyleaddstackgap[#1]SavedStyle#3%
usepackageamsmath
begindocument
Combining two Gaussians with mean $mu_1, mu_2$ and variance $sigma_1^2,
sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian with mean $mu = fracsigma_2^2 mu_1 +
sigma_1^2 mu_2sigma_1^2 + sigma_2^2$ and variance $sigma^2 =
frac1frac1sigma_1^2 + frac1sigma_2^2$
Combining two Gaussians with mean $mu_1, mu_2$ and variance $sigma_1^2,
sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian with mean $mu = qfracsigma_2^2 mu_1 +
sigma_1^2 mu_2sigma_1^2 + sigma_2^2$ and variance $sigma^2 =
qfrac[.5pt]1qfrac1sigma_1^2 + qfrac1sigma_2^2$
enddocument
1
(+1)... I would add your "1pt" inside an extra optional argument of the command.
– koleygr
Mar 8 at 11:18
@koleygr Excellent idea. Thanks
– Steven B. Segletes
Mar 8 at 11:19
Nice answer... Straightforward to the OP's problem. Welcome.
– koleygr
Mar 8 at 11:21
add a comment |
Here, I preserve the fraction in its native textstyle
, but add a (default) 1pt buffer above and below the numerator and denominator of each fraction, which can be changed with an optional argument. I call it qfrac
. The MWE shows before and after.
documentclassarticle
usepackagestackengine,scalerel
stackMath
newcommandqfrac[3][1pt]frac%
ThisStyleaddstackgap[#1]SavedStyle#2%
ThisStyleaddstackgap[#1]SavedStyle#3%
usepackageamsmath
begindocument
Combining two Gaussians with mean $mu_1, mu_2$ and variance $sigma_1^2,
sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian with mean $mu = fracsigma_2^2 mu_1 +
sigma_1^2 mu_2sigma_1^2 + sigma_2^2$ and variance $sigma^2 =
frac1frac1sigma_1^2 + frac1sigma_2^2$
Combining two Gaussians with mean $mu_1, mu_2$ and variance $sigma_1^2,
sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian with mean $mu = qfracsigma_2^2 mu_1 +
sigma_1^2 mu_2sigma_1^2 + sigma_2^2$ and variance $sigma^2 =
qfrac[.5pt]1qfrac1sigma_1^2 + qfrac1sigma_2^2$
enddocument
Here, I preserve the fraction in its native textstyle
, but add a (default) 1pt buffer above and below the numerator and denominator of each fraction, which can be changed with an optional argument. I call it qfrac
. The MWE shows before and after.
documentclassarticle
usepackagestackengine,scalerel
stackMath
newcommandqfrac[3][1pt]frac%
ThisStyleaddstackgap[#1]SavedStyle#2%
ThisStyleaddstackgap[#1]SavedStyle#3%
usepackageamsmath
begindocument
Combining two Gaussians with mean $mu_1, mu_2$ and variance $sigma_1^2,
sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian with mean $mu = fracsigma_2^2 mu_1 +
sigma_1^2 mu_2sigma_1^2 + sigma_2^2$ and variance $sigma^2 =
frac1frac1sigma_1^2 + frac1sigma_2^2$
Combining two Gaussians with mean $mu_1, mu_2$ and variance $sigma_1^2,
sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian with mean $mu = qfracsigma_2^2 mu_1 +
sigma_1^2 mu_2sigma_1^2 + sigma_2^2$ and variance $sigma^2 =
qfrac[.5pt]1qfrac1sigma_1^2 + qfrac1sigma_2^2$
enddocument
edited Mar 8 at 11:22
answered Mar 8 at 11:16
Steven B. SegletesSteven B. Segletes
161k9205416
161k9205416
1
(+1)... I would add your "1pt" inside an extra optional argument of the command.
– koleygr
Mar 8 at 11:18
@koleygr Excellent idea. Thanks
– Steven B. Segletes
Mar 8 at 11:19
Nice answer... Straightforward to the OP's problem. Welcome.
– koleygr
Mar 8 at 11:21
add a comment |
1
(+1)... I would add your "1pt" inside an extra optional argument of the command.
– koleygr
Mar 8 at 11:18
@koleygr Excellent idea. Thanks
– Steven B. Segletes
Mar 8 at 11:19
Nice answer... Straightforward to the OP's problem. Welcome.
– koleygr
Mar 8 at 11:21
1
1
(+1)... I would add your "1pt" inside an extra optional argument of the command.
– koleygr
Mar 8 at 11:18
(+1)... I would add your "1pt" inside an extra optional argument of the command.
– koleygr
Mar 8 at 11:18
@koleygr Excellent idea. Thanks
– Steven B. Segletes
Mar 8 at 11:19
@koleygr Excellent idea. Thanks
– Steven B. Segletes
Mar 8 at 11:19
Nice answer... Straightforward to the OP's problem. Welcome.
– koleygr
Mar 8 at 11:21
Nice answer... Straightforward to the OP's problem. Welcome.
– koleygr
Mar 8 at 11:21
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f478396%2fincrease-the-space-between-numerator-and-denominator%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
Use
dfrac
instead offrac
.– JouleV
Mar 8 at 11:02
You could add a
vphantom
command (for examlevphantomA^A^A
) in the beginning of each problematic dominator, and keep the style as inline math.– koleygr
Mar 8 at 11:06