yum list-security no longer reports package as needing security update

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP












2















We have an audit system that, daily, tracks packages in need of a security update using:



yum list-security --security -q 2


For better or worse, some machines are not patched timely or missed, or are offline for some time. Many machines, to minimize possible issues, will just get security patches applied and this is where things go off the rails a bit.



It seems if there is a newer release of a package that is no longer attached to a security bulletin, packages are not getting updated, when doing a yum update-minimal --security



clamav-0.99.4-1.el7 - installed
clamav-0.100.2-2.el7 - yum list-security (around 11/2018):
clam-0.101.1-1.el7 - current available (not shown in yum list-security)


Am I missing something, or should yum list-security still show this as a package in need of a security update? Or is this just a limitation of how yum list-security works and our auditing is more correct than the package manager?










share|improve this question
























  • The man pages don't seem to have any info for list-security, but it does have info on --security which is what I have always used. Try yum check-update --security for a list of packages that report they are security-related updates. Be warned, the output is quite extensive, but the summary at the end is the number of updates that comply with the --security query, out of the total available, and a list of the actual security updates in question.

    – 0xSheepdog
    Feb 11 at 22:14















2















We have an audit system that, daily, tracks packages in need of a security update using:



yum list-security --security -q 2


For better or worse, some machines are not patched timely or missed, or are offline for some time. Many machines, to minimize possible issues, will just get security patches applied and this is where things go off the rails a bit.



It seems if there is a newer release of a package that is no longer attached to a security bulletin, packages are not getting updated, when doing a yum update-minimal --security



clamav-0.99.4-1.el7 - installed
clamav-0.100.2-2.el7 - yum list-security (around 11/2018):
clam-0.101.1-1.el7 - current available (not shown in yum list-security)


Am I missing something, or should yum list-security still show this as a package in need of a security update? Or is this just a limitation of how yum list-security works and our auditing is more correct than the package manager?










share|improve this question
























  • The man pages don't seem to have any info for list-security, but it does have info on --security which is what I have always used. Try yum check-update --security for a list of packages that report they are security-related updates. Be warned, the output is quite extensive, but the summary at the end is the number of updates that comply with the --security query, out of the total available, and a list of the actual security updates in question.

    – 0xSheepdog
    Feb 11 at 22:14













2












2








2


1






We have an audit system that, daily, tracks packages in need of a security update using:



yum list-security --security -q 2


For better or worse, some machines are not patched timely or missed, or are offline for some time. Many machines, to minimize possible issues, will just get security patches applied and this is where things go off the rails a bit.



It seems if there is a newer release of a package that is no longer attached to a security bulletin, packages are not getting updated, when doing a yum update-minimal --security



clamav-0.99.4-1.el7 - installed
clamav-0.100.2-2.el7 - yum list-security (around 11/2018):
clam-0.101.1-1.el7 - current available (not shown in yum list-security)


Am I missing something, or should yum list-security still show this as a package in need of a security update? Or is this just a limitation of how yum list-security works and our auditing is more correct than the package manager?










share|improve this question
















We have an audit system that, daily, tracks packages in need of a security update using:



yum list-security --security -q 2


For better or worse, some machines are not patched timely or missed, or are offline for some time. Many machines, to minimize possible issues, will just get security patches applied and this is where things go off the rails a bit.



It seems if there is a newer release of a package that is no longer attached to a security bulletin, packages are not getting updated, when doing a yum update-minimal --security



clamav-0.99.4-1.el7 - installed
clamav-0.100.2-2.el7 - yum list-security (around 11/2018):
clam-0.101.1-1.el7 - current available (not shown in yum list-security)


Am I missing something, or should yum list-security still show this as a package in need of a security update? Or is this just a limitation of how yum list-security works and our auditing is more correct than the package manager?







security yum






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Feb 11 at 18:21









Jeff Schaller

42.9k1159137




42.9k1159137










asked Feb 11 at 18:15









Byron70Byron70

111




111












  • The man pages don't seem to have any info for list-security, but it does have info on --security which is what I have always used. Try yum check-update --security for a list of packages that report they are security-related updates. Be warned, the output is quite extensive, but the summary at the end is the number of updates that comply with the --security query, out of the total available, and a list of the actual security updates in question.

    – 0xSheepdog
    Feb 11 at 22:14

















  • The man pages don't seem to have any info for list-security, but it does have info on --security which is what I have always used. Try yum check-update --security for a list of packages that report they are security-related updates. Be warned, the output is quite extensive, but the summary at the end is the number of updates that comply with the --security query, out of the total available, and a list of the actual security updates in question.

    – 0xSheepdog
    Feb 11 at 22:14
















The man pages don't seem to have any info for list-security, but it does have info on --security which is what I have always used. Try yum check-update --security for a list of packages that report they are security-related updates. Be warned, the output is quite extensive, but the summary at the end is the number of updates that comply with the --security query, out of the total available, and a list of the actual security updates in question.

– 0xSheepdog
Feb 11 at 22:14





The man pages don't seem to have any info for list-security, but it does have info on --security which is what I have always used. Try yum check-update --security for a list of packages that report they are security-related updates. Be warned, the output is quite extensive, but the summary at the end is the number of updates that comply with the --security query, out of the total available, and a list of the actual security updates in question.

– 0xSheepdog
Feb 11 at 22:14










0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f500003%2fyum-list-security-no-longer-reports-package-as-needing-security-update%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f500003%2fyum-list-security-no-longer-reports-package-as-needing-security-update%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown






Popular posts from this blog

How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

Bahrain

Postfix configuration issue with fips on centos 7; mailgun relay