MAC address is removed with tainted VirtualBox modules on Fedora 29
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
I am getting crash reports. net/mac80211/driver-ops results in drv_remove_interface. My network interface is removed and I can't connect to the WiFi.
I can recover this by shutting down or going in and out of flight mode. It looks like it crashes once I unsuspend it.
I can't report this. My kernel is tainted. It's VirtualBox modules: vboxpci, vboxnetadp, vboxnetfit and vboxdrv.
- Is VirtualBox causing the issue or is it just restricting me from sending the report?
- Do I need to reinstall VirtualBox after the upgrade?
- Is there a bug in Fedora with VirtualBox and the network interface?
- Is this message misleading and completely unrelated to VirtualBox?
Regardless, I uninstalled it. As most sites referred to the removal in lower case, I just want to highlight that it is title case in Fedora.
sudo dnf remove VirtualBox-5.2.24-1.fc29.x86_64
sudo dnf remove VirtualBox-kmodsrc-5.2.24-1.fc29.noarch
sudo dnf remove VirtualBox-server-5.2.24-1.fc29.x86_64
sudo dnf remove virtualbox-guest-additions-5.2.24-1.fc29.x86_64
fedora kernel virtualbox kernel-modules
asked Feb 8 at 3:38
cbillowescbillowes
1012
add a comment |
I am getting crash reports. net/mac80211/driver-ops results in drv_remove_interface. My network interface is removed and I can't connect to the WiFi.
I can recover this by shutting down or going in and out of flight mode. It looks like it crashes once I unsuspend it.
I can't report this. My kernel is tainted. It's VirtualBox modules: vboxpci, vboxnetadp, vboxnetfit and vboxdrv.
- Is VirtualBox causing the issue or is it just restricting me from sending the report?
- Do I need to reinstall VirtualBox after the upgrade?
- Is there a bug in Fedora with VirtualBox and the network interface?
- Is this message misleading and completely unrelated to VirtualBox?
Regardless, I uninstalled it. As most sites referred to the removal in lower case, I just want to highlight that it is title case in Fedora.
sudo dnf remove VirtualBox-5.2.24-1.fc29.x86_64
sudo dnf remove VirtualBox-kmodsrc-5.2.24-1.fc29.noarch
sudo dnf remove VirtualBox-server-5.2.24-1.fc29.x86_64
sudo dnf remove virtualbox-guest-additions-5.2.24-1.fc29.x86_64
fedora kernel virtualbox kernel-modules
asked Feb 8 at 3:38
cbillowescbillowes
1012
1
If you do not have a specific use for VirtualBox (such as bridging wireless without masquerading or something), you might could give QEMU/KVM a shot, perhaps with one of several front-ends.
– Kenneth B. Jensen
Feb 8 at 6:25
1
Thanks, much appreciated. I will look into that as an alternative.
– cbillowes
Feb 8 at 6:31
add a comment |
I am getting crash reports. net/mac80211/driver-ops results in drv_remove_interface. My network interface is removed and I can't connect to the WiFi.
I can recover this by shutting down or going in and out of flight mode. It looks like it crashes once I unsuspend it.
I can't report this. My kernel is tainted. It's VirtualBox modules: vboxpci, vboxnetadp, vboxnetfit and vboxdrv.
- Is VirtualBox causing the issue or is it just restricting me from sending the report?
- Do I need to reinstall VirtualBox after the upgrade?
- Is there a bug in Fedora with VirtualBox and the network interface?
- Is this message misleading and completely unrelated to VirtualBox?
Regardless, I uninstalled it. As most sites referred to the removal in lower case, I just want to highlight that it is title case in Fedora.
sudo dnf remove VirtualBox-5.2.24-1.fc29.x86_64
sudo dnf remove VirtualBox-kmodsrc-5.2.24-1.fc29.noarch
sudo dnf remove VirtualBox-server-5.2.24-1.fc29.x86_64
sudo dnf remove virtualbox-guest-additions-5.2.24-1.fc29.x86_64
fedora kernel virtualbox kernel-modules
asked Feb 8 at 3:38
cbillowescbillowes
1012
I am getting crash reports. net/mac80211/driver-ops results in drv_remove_interface. My network interface is removed and I can't connect to the WiFi.
I can recover this by shutting down or going in and out of flight mode. It looks like it crashes once I unsuspend it.
I can't report this. My kernel is tainted. It's VirtualBox modules: vboxpci, vboxnetadp, vboxnetfit and vboxdrv.
- Is VirtualBox causing the issue or is it just restricting me from sending the report?
- Do I need to reinstall VirtualBox after the upgrade?
- Is there a bug in Fedora with VirtualBox and the network interface?
- Is this message misleading and completely unrelated to VirtualBox?
Regardless, I uninstalled it. As most sites referred to the removal in lower case, I just want to highlight that it is title case in Fedora.
sudo dnf remove VirtualBox-5.2.24-1.fc29.x86_64
sudo dnf remove VirtualBox-kmodsrc-5.2.24-1.fc29.noarch
sudo dnf remove VirtualBox-server-5.2.24-1.fc29.x86_64
sudo dnf remove virtualbox-guest-additions-5.2.24-1.fc29.x86_64
fedora kernel virtualbox kernel-modules
fedora kernel virtualbox kernel-modules
asked Feb 8 at 3:38
cbillowescbillowes
1012
asked Feb 8 at 3:38
cbillowescbillowes
1012
asked Feb 8 at 3:38
cbillowescbillowes
1012
asked Feb 8 at 3:38
cbillowescbillowes
1012
asked Feb 8 at 3:38
cbillowescbillowes
1012
1012
1
If you do not have a specific use for VirtualBox (such as bridging wireless without masquerading or something), you might could give QEMU/KVM a shot, perhaps with one of several front-ends.
– Kenneth B. Jensen
Feb 8 at 6:25
1
Thanks, much appreciated. I will look into that as an alternative.
– cbillowes
Feb 8 at 6:31
add a comment |
1
If you do not have a specific use for VirtualBox (such as bridging wireless without masquerading or something), you might could give QEMU/KVM a shot, perhaps with one of several front-ends.
– Kenneth B. Jensen
Feb 8 at 6:25
1
Thanks, much appreciated. I will look into that as an alternative.
– cbillowes
Feb 8 at 6:31
1
1
If you do not have a specific use for VirtualBox (such as bridging wireless without masquerading or something), you might could give QEMU/KVM a shot, perhaps with one of several front-ends.
– Kenneth B. Jensen
Feb 8 at 6:25
If you do not have a specific use for VirtualBox (such as bridging wireless without masquerading or something), you might could give QEMU/KVM a shot, perhaps with one of several front-ends.
– Kenneth B. Jensen
Feb 8 at 6:25
1
1
Thanks, much appreciated. I will look into that as an alternative.
– cbillowes
Feb 8 at 6:31
Thanks, much appreciated. I will look into that as an alternative.
– cbillowes
Feb 8 at 6:31
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f499395%2fmac-address-is-removed-with-tainted-virtualbox-modules-on-fedora-29%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f499395%2fmac-address-is-removed-with-tainted-virtualbox-modules-on-fedora-29%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
If you do not have a specific use for VirtualBox (such as bridging wireless without masquerading or something), you might could give QEMU/KVM a shot, perhaps with one of several front-ends.
– Kenneth B. Jensen
Feb 8 at 6:25
1
Thanks, much appreciated. I will look into that as an alternative.
– cbillowes
Feb 8 at 6:31