Clues on how to solve these types of problems within 2-3 minutes for competitive exams

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP












12












$begingroup$


$$int_0^102left(prod_k=1^100(x-k)right)left(sum_k=1^100frac1x-kright),dx$$



I've tried solving this problem but only thing that comes to my mind is the manual integration by multiplication of the expressions which will literally take much longer than the allotted time for competitive exams Now this is a homework and exercises problem but I'd be glad if I could get some clues on how to solve this problem.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    My guess is the integrand is anti-symmetric about $x=51$ so that the integral is zero.
    $endgroup$
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Feb 27 at 6:59










  • $begingroup$
    The answer given is 101!-100! but no solutions also i can't find such problem online to learn
    $endgroup$
    – HOME WORK AND EXERCISES
    Feb 27 at 7:05










  • $begingroup$
    How about using the reverse product rule?
    $endgroup$
    – Paras Khosla
    Feb 27 at 7:08






  • 10




    $begingroup$
    As a problem solving tip, always write out the first few terms of the series, make observations and hypothesize a probable path to the solution.
    $endgroup$
    – Paras Khosla
    Feb 27 at 8:58







  • 7




    $begingroup$
    Anybody gives me such an exercise, I start by replacing 100 by 3 (or even 2), this gives something which is far more easy to handle, and I have something I can learn from.
    $endgroup$
    – Dominique
    Feb 27 at 14:20















12












$begingroup$


$$int_0^102left(prod_k=1^100(x-k)right)left(sum_k=1^100frac1x-kright),dx$$



I've tried solving this problem but only thing that comes to my mind is the manual integration by multiplication of the expressions which will literally take much longer than the allotted time for competitive exams Now this is a homework and exercises problem but I'd be glad if I could get some clues on how to solve this problem.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    My guess is the integrand is anti-symmetric about $x=51$ so that the integral is zero.
    $endgroup$
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Feb 27 at 6:59










  • $begingroup$
    The answer given is 101!-100! but no solutions also i can't find such problem online to learn
    $endgroup$
    – HOME WORK AND EXERCISES
    Feb 27 at 7:05










  • $begingroup$
    How about using the reverse product rule?
    $endgroup$
    – Paras Khosla
    Feb 27 at 7:08






  • 10




    $begingroup$
    As a problem solving tip, always write out the first few terms of the series, make observations and hypothesize a probable path to the solution.
    $endgroup$
    – Paras Khosla
    Feb 27 at 8:58







  • 7




    $begingroup$
    Anybody gives me such an exercise, I start by replacing 100 by 3 (or even 2), this gives something which is far more easy to handle, and I have something I can learn from.
    $endgroup$
    – Dominique
    Feb 27 at 14:20













12












12








12


2



$begingroup$


$$int_0^102left(prod_k=1^100(x-k)right)left(sum_k=1^100frac1x-kright),dx$$



I've tried solving this problem but only thing that comes to my mind is the manual integration by multiplication of the expressions which will literally take much longer than the allotted time for competitive exams Now this is a homework and exercises problem but I'd be glad if I could get some clues on how to solve this problem.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




$$int_0^102left(prod_k=1^100(x-k)right)left(sum_k=1^100frac1x-kright),dx$$



I've tried solving this problem but only thing that comes to my mind is the manual integration by multiplication of the expressions which will literally take much longer than the allotted time for competitive exams Now this is a homework and exercises problem but I'd be glad if I could get some clues on how to solve this problem.







integration derivatives definite-integrals






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Feb 27 at 9:09









Paras Khosla

2,663323




2,663323










asked Feb 27 at 6:50









HOME WORK AND EXERCISESHOME WORK AND EXERCISES

999




999







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    My guess is the integrand is anti-symmetric about $x=51$ so that the integral is zero.
    $endgroup$
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Feb 27 at 6:59










  • $begingroup$
    The answer given is 101!-100! but no solutions also i can't find such problem online to learn
    $endgroup$
    – HOME WORK AND EXERCISES
    Feb 27 at 7:05










  • $begingroup$
    How about using the reverse product rule?
    $endgroup$
    – Paras Khosla
    Feb 27 at 7:08






  • 10




    $begingroup$
    As a problem solving tip, always write out the first few terms of the series, make observations and hypothesize a probable path to the solution.
    $endgroup$
    – Paras Khosla
    Feb 27 at 8:58







  • 7




    $begingroup$
    Anybody gives me such an exercise, I start by replacing 100 by 3 (or even 2), this gives something which is far more easy to handle, and I have something I can learn from.
    $endgroup$
    – Dominique
    Feb 27 at 14:20












  • 2




    $begingroup$
    My guess is the integrand is anti-symmetric about $x=51$ so that the integral is zero.
    $endgroup$
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Feb 27 at 6:59










  • $begingroup$
    The answer given is 101!-100! but no solutions also i can't find such problem online to learn
    $endgroup$
    – HOME WORK AND EXERCISES
    Feb 27 at 7:05










  • $begingroup$
    How about using the reverse product rule?
    $endgroup$
    – Paras Khosla
    Feb 27 at 7:08






  • 10




    $begingroup$
    As a problem solving tip, always write out the first few terms of the series, make observations and hypothesize a probable path to the solution.
    $endgroup$
    – Paras Khosla
    Feb 27 at 8:58







  • 7




    $begingroup$
    Anybody gives me such an exercise, I start by replacing 100 by 3 (or even 2), this gives something which is far more easy to handle, and I have something I can learn from.
    $endgroup$
    – Dominique
    Feb 27 at 14:20







2




2




$begingroup$
My guess is the integrand is anti-symmetric about $x=51$ so that the integral is zero.
$endgroup$
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Feb 27 at 6:59




$begingroup$
My guess is the integrand is anti-symmetric about $x=51$ so that the integral is zero.
$endgroup$
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Feb 27 at 6:59












$begingroup$
The answer given is 101!-100! but no solutions also i can't find such problem online to learn
$endgroup$
– HOME WORK AND EXERCISES
Feb 27 at 7:05




$begingroup$
The answer given is 101!-100! but no solutions also i can't find such problem online to learn
$endgroup$
– HOME WORK AND EXERCISES
Feb 27 at 7:05












$begingroup$
How about using the reverse product rule?
$endgroup$
– Paras Khosla
Feb 27 at 7:08




$begingroup$
How about using the reverse product rule?
$endgroup$
– Paras Khosla
Feb 27 at 7:08




10




10




$begingroup$
As a problem solving tip, always write out the first few terms of the series, make observations and hypothesize a probable path to the solution.
$endgroup$
– Paras Khosla
Feb 27 at 8:58





$begingroup$
As a problem solving tip, always write out the first few terms of the series, make observations and hypothesize a probable path to the solution.
$endgroup$
– Paras Khosla
Feb 27 at 8:58





7




7




$begingroup$
Anybody gives me such an exercise, I start by replacing 100 by 3 (or even 2), this gives something which is far more easy to handle, and I have something I can learn from.
$endgroup$
– Dominique
Feb 27 at 14:20




$begingroup$
Anybody gives me such an exercise, I start by replacing 100 by 3 (or even 2), this gives something which is far more easy to handle, and I have something I can learn from.
$endgroup$
– Dominique
Feb 27 at 14:20










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















21












$begingroup$

Hint:



By the product rule you have the following result:



$$dfracmathrm dmathrm dxprod_k=1^100(x-k)=left(prod_k=1^100(x-k)right)left(sum_k=1^100dfrac1(x-k)right)$$



Integrate both sides from $0$ to $102$, use the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and you'll be done in no time.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
    $endgroup$
    – quid
    Feb 28 at 8:49


















10












$begingroup$

Here's a quick hint: if you differentiate the product in the integrand, you get the entire integrand so by the fundamental theorem of calculus you can evaluate this very fast.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    So how do i diffrentiate it? would'nt it take longer? I might sound stupid to you but I am new to these
    $endgroup$
    – HOME WORK AND EXERCISES
    Feb 27 at 7:09






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I think Paras said it--the product rule gives it to you.
    $endgroup$
    – Jonathan Levy
    Feb 27 at 7:13










Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3128507%2fclues-on-how-to-solve-these-types-of-problems-within-2-3-minutes-for-competitive%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









21












$begingroup$

Hint:



By the product rule you have the following result:



$$dfracmathrm dmathrm dxprod_k=1^100(x-k)=left(prod_k=1^100(x-k)right)left(sum_k=1^100dfrac1(x-k)right)$$



Integrate both sides from $0$ to $102$, use the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and you'll be done in no time.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
    $endgroup$
    – quid
    Feb 28 at 8:49















21












$begingroup$

Hint:



By the product rule you have the following result:



$$dfracmathrm dmathrm dxprod_k=1^100(x-k)=left(prod_k=1^100(x-k)right)left(sum_k=1^100dfrac1(x-k)right)$$



Integrate both sides from $0$ to $102$, use the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and you'll be done in no time.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
    $endgroup$
    – quid
    Feb 28 at 8:49













21












21








21





$begingroup$

Hint:



By the product rule you have the following result:



$$dfracmathrm dmathrm dxprod_k=1^100(x-k)=left(prod_k=1^100(x-k)right)left(sum_k=1^100dfrac1(x-k)right)$$



Integrate both sides from $0$ to $102$, use the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and you'll be done in no time.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Hint:



By the product rule you have the following result:



$$dfracmathrm dmathrm dxprod_k=1^100(x-k)=left(prod_k=1^100(x-k)right)left(sum_k=1^100dfrac1(x-k)right)$$



Integrate both sides from $0$ to $102$, use the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and you'll be done in no time.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Feb 27 at 10:14









Community

1




1










answered Feb 27 at 7:10









Paras KhoslaParas Khosla

2,663323




2,663323











  • $begingroup$
    Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
    $endgroup$
    – quid
    Feb 28 at 8:49
















  • $begingroup$
    Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
    $endgroup$
    – quid
    Feb 28 at 8:49















$begingroup$
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
$endgroup$
– quid
Feb 28 at 8:49




$begingroup$
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
$endgroup$
– quid
Feb 28 at 8:49











10












$begingroup$

Here's a quick hint: if you differentiate the product in the integrand, you get the entire integrand so by the fundamental theorem of calculus you can evaluate this very fast.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    So how do i diffrentiate it? would'nt it take longer? I might sound stupid to you but I am new to these
    $endgroup$
    – HOME WORK AND EXERCISES
    Feb 27 at 7:09






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I think Paras said it--the product rule gives it to you.
    $endgroup$
    – Jonathan Levy
    Feb 27 at 7:13















10












$begingroup$

Here's a quick hint: if you differentiate the product in the integrand, you get the entire integrand so by the fundamental theorem of calculus you can evaluate this very fast.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    So how do i diffrentiate it? would'nt it take longer? I might sound stupid to you but I am new to these
    $endgroup$
    – HOME WORK AND EXERCISES
    Feb 27 at 7:09






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I think Paras said it--the product rule gives it to you.
    $endgroup$
    – Jonathan Levy
    Feb 27 at 7:13













10












10








10





$begingroup$

Here's a quick hint: if you differentiate the product in the integrand, you get the entire integrand so by the fundamental theorem of calculus you can evaluate this very fast.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Here's a quick hint: if you differentiate the product in the integrand, you get the entire integrand so by the fundamental theorem of calculus you can evaluate this very fast.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Feb 27 at 7:01









Jonathan LevyJonathan Levy

1796




1796











  • $begingroup$
    So how do i diffrentiate it? would'nt it take longer? I might sound stupid to you but I am new to these
    $endgroup$
    – HOME WORK AND EXERCISES
    Feb 27 at 7:09






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I think Paras said it--the product rule gives it to you.
    $endgroup$
    – Jonathan Levy
    Feb 27 at 7:13
















  • $begingroup$
    So how do i diffrentiate it? would'nt it take longer? I might sound stupid to you but I am new to these
    $endgroup$
    – HOME WORK AND EXERCISES
    Feb 27 at 7:09






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I think Paras said it--the product rule gives it to you.
    $endgroup$
    – Jonathan Levy
    Feb 27 at 7:13















$begingroup$
So how do i diffrentiate it? would'nt it take longer? I might sound stupid to you but I am new to these
$endgroup$
– HOME WORK AND EXERCISES
Feb 27 at 7:09




$begingroup$
So how do i diffrentiate it? would'nt it take longer? I might sound stupid to you but I am new to these
$endgroup$
– HOME WORK AND EXERCISES
Feb 27 at 7:09




2




2




$begingroup$
I think Paras said it--the product rule gives it to you.
$endgroup$
– Jonathan Levy
Feb 27 at 7:13




$begingroup$
I think Paras said it--the product rule gives it to you.
$endgroup$
– Jonathan Levy
Feb 27 at 7:13

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3128507%2fclues-on-how-to-solve-these-types-of-problems-within-2-3-minutes-for-competitive%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown






Popular posts from this blog

Peggy Mitchell

Palaiologos

The Forum (Inglewood, California)