mjhjmtu

I seem to have found something that Clang and GCC disagree on. Here's the code:

int main() 
 if constexpr (2) 

This successfully compiles with GCC 7.4.0, but it fails with Clang 7.0.0 with this error message:

test.cpp:3:17: error: constexpr if condition evaluates to 2, which cannot be narrowed to type 'bool'
 [-Wc++11-narrowing]
 if constexpr (2) 
 ^
1 error generated.

cppreference doesn't seem to mention "narrowing", so this seems like a Clang bug, but I'm not entirely certain. If this is a bug with either compiler, has it already been reported?

Clang is diagnosing under these paragraphs

[stmt.if] (emphasis mine)

2 If the if statement is of the form if constexpr, the value of
the condition shall be a contextually converted constant expression of
type bool; this form is called a constexpr if statement.

[expr.const]

4 A converted constant expression of type T is an expression,
implicitly converted to type T, where the converted expression is a
constant expression and the implicit conversion sequence contains only

• integral conversions other than narrowing conversions,

Now, when it comes to integral conversions, a conversion to bool is listed as an integral conversion. And it is narrowing, in the strictest sense of the word, since a bool cannot represent all the values of an int. So the diagnostic is not without grounds.

But I think it's also quite reasonable to consider the fact a conversion to bool is usually intended to check for "truthiness", and so the narrowing nature of it shouldn't matter. It looks like a minor bug in the standard¹, with GCC taking the common-sense route, and Clang adhering to the dry letter of the law in the strictest sense.

_{¹ - And a proposal exists to change it.}

We say it, but it's hidden. "contextually converted constant expression of type bool" is a standard term-of-art that excludes narrowing conversions.

Clang is correct.