Post Tax 401k or Taxable Brokerage Account?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;







up vote
3
down vote

favorite












I max out my pre-tax 401k, HSA, and do a roth IRA or backdoor Roth IRA.



With my additional savings is there any reason i would want to do a post-tax 401k instead of keeping it in a regular taxable brokerage account? Right now I have always been doing a brokerage account because I never considered the after-tax 401k.



Pros of post-tax 401k

- no capital gains

- dividends not taxed



Pros of Brokerage account.

- I can withdraw the money to invest in buy & hold real estate or other asset classes

- It can be withdrawn without penalties (but with taxes) for expenses outside of what an emergency fund would cover.










share|improve this question























  • Note that for your "pros", dividends and capital gains are tax deferred, not tax free.
    – D Stanley
    yesterday










  • Thank you will update great point
    – Frank Visaggio
    yesterday










  • I think by post-tax 401k you mean a traditional IRA where contributions are not deductible. If that is the case, it would be helpful if you could update your question.
    – Jeff O'Neill
    8 hours ago










  • @JeffO'Neill a non-deferred 401(k) is a real thing and is often referred to as a post-tax or after tax 401(k). It's not an IRA (but the same answer would apply if it were).
    – stannius
    3 hours ago











  • i need to look at my fidelity and see what exactly this post tax money is going into. It just has a % deducted and then when you go over the 19k limit for pre tax 401k it puts it somewhere else. I need to confirm where its actually goes.
    – Frank Visaggio
    3 hours ago
















up vote
3
down vote

favorite












I max out my pre-tax 401k, HSA, and do a roth IRA or backdoor Roth IRA.



With my additional savings is there any reason i would want to do a post-tax 401k instead of keeping it in a regular taxable brokerage account? Right now I have always been doing a brokerage account because I never considered the after-tax 401k.



Pros of post-tax 401k

- no capital gains

- dividends not taxed



Pros of Brokerage account.

- I can withdraw the money to invest in buy & hold real estate or other asset classes

- It can be withdrawn without penalties (but with taxes) for expenses outside of what an emergency fund would cover.










share|improve this question























  • Note that for your "pros", dividends and capital gains are tax deferred, not tax free.
    – D Stanley
    yesterday










  • Thank you will update great point
    – Frank Visaggio
    yesterday










  • I think by post-tax 401k you mean a traditional IRA where contributions are not deductible. If that is the case, it would be helpful if you could update your question.
    – Jeff O'Neill
    8 hours ago










  • @JeffO'Neill a non-deferred 401(k) is a real thing and is often referred to as a post-tax or after tax 401(k). It's not an IRA (but the same answer would apply if it were).
    – stannius
    3 hours ago











  • i need to look at my fidelity and see what exactly this post tax money is going into. It just has a % deducted and then when you go over the 19k limit for pre tax 401k it puts it somewhere else. I need to confirm where its actually goes.
    – Frank Visaggio
    3 hours ago












up vote
3
down vote

favorite









up vote
3
down vote

favorite











I max out my pre-tax 401k, HSA, and do a roth IRA or backdoor Roth IRA.



With my additional savings is there any reason i would want to do a post-tax 401k instead of keeping it in a regular taxable brokerage account? Right now I have always been doing a brokerage account because I never considered the after-tax 401k.



Pros of post-tax 401k

- no capital gains

- dividends not taxed



Pros of Brokerage account.

- I can withdraw the money to invest in buy & hold real estate or other asset classes

- It can be withdrawn without penalties (but with taxes) for expenses outside of what an emergency fund would cover.










share|improve this question















I max out my pre-tax 401k, HSA, and do a roth IRA or backdoor Roth IRA.



With my additional savings is there any reason i would want to do a post-tax 401k instead of keeping it in a regular taxable brokerage account? Right now I have always been doing a brokerage account because I never considered the after-tax 401k.



Pros of post-tax 401k

- no capital gains

- dividends not taxed



Pros of Brokerage account.

- I can withdraw the money to invest in buy & hold real estate or other asset classes

- It can be withdrawn without penalties (but with taxes) for expenses outside of what an emergency fund would cover.







united-states taxes 401k asset-allocation roth-401k






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 22 hours ago









Chris W. Rea

26.3k1586174




26.3k1586174










asked yesterday









Frank Visaggio

311313




311313











  • Note that for your "pros", dividends and capital gains are tax deferred, not tax free.
    – D Stanley
    yesterday










  • Thank you will update great point
    – Frank Visaggio
    yesterday










  • I think by post-tax 401k you mean a traditional IRA where contributions are not deductible. If that is the case, it would be helpful if you could update your question.
    – Jeff O'Neill
    8 hours ago










  • @JeffO'Neill a non-deferred 401(k) is a real thing and is often referred to as a post-tax or after tax 401(k). It's not an IRA (but the same answer would apply if it were).
    – stannius
    3 hours ago











  • i need to look at my fidelity and see what exactly this post tax money is going into. It just has a % deducted and then when you go over the 19k limit for pre tax 401k it puts it somewhere else. I need to confirm where its actually goes.
    – Frank Visaggio
    3 hours ago
















  • Note that for your "pros", dividends and capital gains are tax deferred, not tax free.
    – D Stanley
    yesterday










  • Thank you will update great point
    – Frank Visaggio
    yesterday










  • I think by post-tax 401k you mean a traditional IRA where contributions are not deductible. If that is the case, it would be helpful if you could update your question.
    – Jeff O'Neill
    8 hours ago










  • @JeffO'Neill a non-deferred 401(k) is a real thing and is often referred to as a post-tax or after tax 401(k). It's not an IRA (but the same answer would apply if it were).
    – stannius
    3 hours ago











  • i need to look at my fidelity and see what exactly this post tax money is going into. It just has a % deducted and then when you go over the 19k limit for pre tax 401k it puts it somewhere else. I need to confirm where its actually goes.
    – Frank Visaggio
    3 hours ago















Note that for your "pros", dividends and capital gains are tax deferred, not tax free.
– D Stanley
yesterday




Note that for your "pros", dividends and capital gains are tax deferred, not tax free.
– D Stanley
yesterday












Thank you will update great point
– Frank Visaggio
yesterday




Thank you will update great point
– Frank Visaggio
yesterday












I think by post-tax 401k you mean a traditional IRA where contributions are not deductible. If that is the case, it would be helpful if you could update your question.
– Jeff O'Neill
8 hours ago




I think by post-tax 401k you mean a traditional IRA where contributions are not deductible. If that is the case, it would be helpful if you could update your question.
– Jeff O'Neill
8 hours ago












@JeffO'Neill a non-deferred 401(k) is a real thing and is often referred to as a post-tax or after tax 401(k). It's not an IRA (but the same answer would apply if it were).
– stannius
3 hours ago





@JeffO'Neill a non-deferred 401(k) is a real thing and is often referred to as a post-tax or after tax 401(k). It's not an IRA (but the same answer would apply if it were).
– stannius
3 hours ago













i need to look at my fidelity and see what exactly this post tax money is going into. It just has a % deducted and then when you go over the 19k limit for pre tax 401k it puts it somewhere else. I need to confirm where its actually goes.
– Frank Visaggio
3 hours ago




i need to look at my fidelity and see what exactly this post tax money is going into. It just has a % deducted and then when you go over the 19k limit for pre tax 401k it puts it somewhere else. I need to confirm where its actually goes.
– Frank Visaggio
3 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
5
down vote













A post-tax IRA is not a very good deal. You don't save any taxes now. When you take the money out, you pay ordinary income tax rates on the gains.



If you invest in a brokerage account instead, you pay capital gains taxes when you sell. I don't have a reference but I don't think the long-term capital gains rate has ever been higher than the ordinary income rate in the same bracket, and for as long as I can remember, it has often been a lot lower. Short term capital gains are at worst taxed at ordinary income rates. Dividends are taxed either at ordinary income tax rates or at capital gains rates.



One small advantage of a taxable 401(k) is that you don't have to pay taxes as you go. Dividends are taxable when you receive them, even if you reinvest them. You have some control over when you realize capital gains, but if you invest in a mutual fund, it may distribute capital gains against your will. If you do trade a lot in your taxable 401(k), the deferral could be a benefit. But you probably shouldn't be trading a lot in a retirement account.



A 401(k) has better protection from lawsuits. You can get that protection with insurance, including umbrella insurance.



Personally, I would never invest in a taxable 401(k). You give up too much flexibility for too little tax deferral.






share|improve this answer





























    up vote
    2
    down vote














    With my additional savings is there any reason i would want to do a post-tax 401k instead of keeping it in a regular taxable brokerage account?




    Let's clarify what you mean by "post-tax 401k".



    First there is the Roth 401k, which behaves like a Roth IRA -- money that you contribute is taxed, but you pay no taxes on earnings when you withdraw them in retirement. However, a Roth 401k shares the same contribution pool as a Traditional 401k, so if your goal is to invest more money, this is not helpful -- every dollar you contribute to a Roth 401k is one less dollar you can contribute to a Traditional 401k, and vice versa.



    The second is rarer, and is not offered by many 401k providers; it is called spillover contributions, spillover elections, or excess elections. In this case (which, again, most 401k providers do not currently support), you can contribute money in excess of the normal contribution limit ($18,500 in 2018, $19,000 in 2019) to a Traditional 401k; however, it is not tax-deductible like normal contributions are.



    On the face of it, this is a bad move: you would pay income taxes on any earnings, which will be more than the long term capital gains you would pay on any earnings if it was just a brokerage account.



    However, being in a 401k, it can be rolled over into a Traditional IRA (though it would have the same problem), or into a Roth IRA. Since it has already been taxed, it generates no new taxes to convert it to a Roth IRA, and now any growth will be created tax free. Since the amount of spillover contributions you're allowed is quite large (in 2018, $36,500 minus whatever employer match you may have had), it functions very, very, very much like an additional, and quite possibly very large, Roth IRA contribution. This process -- making spillover contributions, and then rolling them over into a Roth IRA -- is called the megabackdoor Roth.



    Rolling the money over into a Roth IRA does require either that your 401k provider allow in service withdrawals, or that you leave your employer, however. If your 401k provider does not allow in service withdrawals, and you plan on staying with your employer for a significant number of years to come, the megabackdoor Roth may not be an appropriate choice.



    More information on the megabackdoor Roth can be found at Bogleheads or at the Mad Fientist.




    I can withdraw the money to invest in buy & hold real estate or other asset classes
    It can be withdrawn without penalties (but with taxes) for expenses outside of what an emergency fund would cover.




    Be aware that, as with other Roth IRA conversions, five years after you convert the money to a Roth IRA (either from a Roth 401k or via the megabackdoor Roth) you can withdraw that amount (though not any earnings) at any time without penalty.






    share|improve this answer




















    • Great answer. If an employer allows both after tax 401k contributions and in-service withdrawals, then it's a no-brainer.
      – TTT
      4 hours ago










    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "93"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmoney.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f102017%2fpost-tax-401k-or-taxable-brokerage-account%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    5
    down vote













    A post-tax IRA is not a very good deal. You don't save any taxes now. When you take the money out, you pay ordinary income tax rates on the gains.



    If you invest in a brokerage account instead, you pay capital gains taxes when you sell. I don't have a reference but I don't think the long-term capital gains rate has ever been higher than the ordinary income rate in the same bracket, and for as long as I can remember, it has often been a lot lower. Short term capital gains are at worst taxed at ordinary income rates. Dividends are taxed either at ordinary income tax rates or at capital gains rates.



    One small advantage of a taxable 401(k) is that you don't have to pay taxes as you go. Dividends are taxable when you receive them, even if you reinvest them. You have some control over when you realize capital gains, but if you invest in a mutual fund, it may distribute capital gains against your will. If you do trade a lot in your taxable 401(k), the deferral could be a benefit. But you probably shouldn't be trading a lot in a retirement account.



    A 401(k) has better protection from lawsuits. You can get that protection with insurance, including umbrella insurance.



    Personally, I would never invest in a taxable 401(k). You give up too much flexibility for too little tax deferral.






    share|improve this answer


























      up vote
      5
      down vote













      A post-tax IRA is not a very good deal. You don't save any taxes now. When you take the money out, you pay ordinary income tax rates on the gains.



      If you invest in a brokerage account instead, you pay capital gains taxes when you sell. I don't have a reference but I don't think the long-term capital gains rate has ever been higher than the ordinary income rate in the same bracket, and for as long as I can remember, it has often been a lot lower. Short term capital gains are at worst taxed at ordinary income rates. Dividends are taxed either at ordinary income tax rates or at capital gains rates.



      One small advantage of a taxable 401(k) is that you don't have to pay taxes as you go. Dividends are taxable when you receive them, even if you reinvest them. You have some control over when you realize capital gains, but if you invest in a mutual fund, it may distribute capital gains against your will. If you do trade a lot in your taxable 401(k), the deferral could be a benefit. But you probably shouldn't be trading a lot in a retirement account.



      A 401(k) has better protection from lawsuits. You can get that protection with insurance, including umbrella insurance.



      Personally, I would never invest in a taxable 401(k). You give up too much flexibility for too little tax deferral.






      share|improve this answer
























        up vote
        5
        down vote










        up vote
        5
        down vote









        A post-tax IRA is not a very good deal. You don't save any taxes now. When you take the money out, you pay ordinary income tax rates on the gains.



        If you invest in a brokerage account instead, you pay capital gains taxes when you sell. I don't have a reference but I don't think the long-term capital gains rate has ever been higher than the ordinary income rate in the same bracket, and for as long as I can remember, it has often been a lot lower. Short term capital gains are at worst taxed at ordinary income rates. Dividends are taxed either at ordinary income tax rates or at capital gains rates.



        One small advantage of a taxable 401(k) is that you don't have to pay taxes as you go. Dividends are taxable when you receive them, even if you reinvest them. You have some control over when you realize capital gains, but if you invest in a mutual fund, it may distribute capital gains against your will. If you do trade a lot in your taxable 401(k), the deferral could be a benefit. But you probably shouldn't be trading a lot in a retirement account.



        A 401(k) has better protection from lawsuits. You can get that protection with insurance, including umbrella insurance.



        Personally, I would never invest in a taxable 401(k). You give up too much flexibility for too little tax deferral.






        share|improve this answer














        A post-tax IRA is not a very good deal. You don't save any taxes now. When you take the money out, you pay ordinary income tax rates on the gains.



        If you invest in a brokerage account instead, you pay capital gains taxes when you sell. I don't have a reference but I don't think the long-term capital gains rate has ever been higher than the ordinary income rate in the same bracket, and for as long as I can remember, it has often been a lot lower. Short term capital gains are at worst taxed at ordinary income rates. Dividends are taxed either at ordinary income tax rates or at capital gains rates.



        One small advantage of a taxable 401(k) is that you don't have to pay taxes as you go. Dividends are taxable when you receive them, even if you reinvest them. You have some control over when you realize capital gains, but if you invest in a mutual fund, it may distribute capital gains against your will. If you do trade a lot in your taxable 401(k), the deferral could be a benefit. But you probably shouldn't be trading a lot in a retirement account.



        A 401(k) has better protection from lawsuits. You can get that protection with insurance, including umbrella insurance.



        Personally, I would never invest in a taxable 401(k). You give up too much flexibility for too little tax deferral.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited 1 hour ago

























        answered yesterday









        stannius

        2,6621924




        2,6621924






















            up vote
            2
            down vote














            With my additional savings is there any reason i would want to do a post-tax 401k instead of keeping it in a regular taxable brokerage account?




            Let's clarify what you mean by "post-tax 401k".



            First there is the Roth 401k, which behaves like a Roth IRA -- money that you contribute is taxed, but you pay no taxes on earnings when you withdraw them in retirement. However, a Roth 401k shares the same contribution pool as a Traditional 401k, so if your goal is to invest more money, this is not helpful -- every dollar you contribute to a Roth 401k is one less dollar you can contribute to a Traditional 401k, and vice versa.



            The second is rarer, and is not offered by many 401k providers; it is called spillover contributions, spillover elections, or excess elections. In this case (which, again, most 401k providers do not currently support), you can contribute money in excess of the normal contribution limit ($18,500 in 2018, $19,000 in 2019) to a Traditional 401k; however, it is not tax-deductible like normal contributions are.



            On the face of it, this is a bad move: you would pay income taxes on any earnings, which will be more than the long term capital gains you would pay on any earnings if it was just a brokerage account.



            However, being in a 401k, it can be rolled over into a Traditional IRA (though it would have the same problem), or into a Roth IRA. Since it has already been taxed, it generates no new taxes to convert it to a Roth IRA, and now any growth will be created tax free. Since the amount of spillover contributions you're allowed is quite large (in 2018, $36,500 minus whatever employer match you may have had), it functions very, very, very much like an additional, and quite possibly very large, Roth IRA contribution. This process -- making spillover contributions, and then rolling them over into a Roth IRA -- is called the megabackdoor Roth.



            Rolling the money over into a Roth IRA does require either that your 401k provider allow in service withdrawals, or that you leave your employer, however. If your 401k provider does not allow in service withdrawals, and you plan on staying with your employer for a significant number of years to come, the megabackdoor Roth may not be an appropriate choice.



            More information on the megabackdoor Roth can be found at Bogleheads or at the Mad Fientist.




            I can withdraw the money to invest in buy & hold real estate or other asset classes
            It can be withdrawn without penalties (but with taxes) for expenses outside of what an emergency fund would cover.




            Be aware that, as with other Roth IRA conversions, five years after you convert the money to a Roth IRA (either from a Roth 401k or via the megabackdoor Roth) you can withdraw that amount (though not any earnings) at any time without penalty.






            share|improve this answer




















            • Great answer. If an employer allows both after tax 401k contributions and in-service withdrawals, then it's a no-brainer.
              – TTT
              4 hours ago














            up vote
            2
            down vote














            With my additional savings is there any reason i would want to do a post-tax 401k instead of keeping it in a regular taxable brokerage account?




            Let's clarify what you mean by "post-tax 401k".



            First there is the Roth 401k, which behaves like a Roth IRA -- money that you contribute is taxed, but you pay no taxes on earnings when you withdraw them in retirement. However, a Roth 401k shares the same contribution pool as a Traditional 401k, so if your goal is to invest more money, this is not helpful -- every dollar you contribute to a Roth 401k is one less dollar you can contribute to a Traditional 401k, and vice versa.



            The second is rarer, and is not offered by many 401k providers; it is called spillover contributions, spillover elections, or excess elections. In this case (which, again, most 401k providers do not currently support), you can contribute money in excess of the normal contribution limit ($18,500 in 2018, $19,000 in 2019) to a Traditional 401k; however, it is not tax-deductible like normal contributions are.



            On the face of it, this is a bad move: you would pay income taxes on any earnings, which will be more than the long term capital gains you would pay on any earnings if it was just a brokerage account.



            However, being in a 401k, it can be rolled over into a Traditional IRA (though it would have the same problem), or into a Roth IRA. Since it has already been taxed, it generates no new taxes to convert it to a Roth IRA, and now any growth will be created tax free. Since the amount of spillover contributions you're allowed is quite large (in 2018, $36,500 minus whatever employer match you may have had), it functions very, very, very much like an additional, and quite possibly very large, Roth IRA contribution. This process -- making spillover contributions, and then rolling them over into a Roth IRA -- is called the megabackdoor Roth.



            Rolling the money over into a Roth IRA does require either that your 401k provider allow in service withdrawals, or that you leave your employer, however. If your 401k provider does not allow in service withdrawals, and you plan on staying with your employer for a significant number of years to come, the megabackdoor Roth may not be an appropriate choice.



            More information on the megabackdoor Roth can be found at Bogleheads or at the Mad Fientist.




            I can withdraw the money to invest in buy & hold real estate or other asset classes
            It can be withdrawn without penalties (but with taxes) for expenses outside of what an emergency fund would cover.




            Be aware that, as with other Roth IRA conversions, five years after you convert the money to a Roth IRA (either from a Roth 401k or via the megabackdoor Roth) you can withdraw that amount (though not any earnings) at any time without penalty.






            share|improve this answer




















            • Great answer. If an employer allows both after tax 401k contributions and in-service withdrawals, then it's a no-brainer.
              – TTT
              4 hours ago












            up vote
            2
            down vote










            up vote
            2
            down vote










            With my additional savings is there any reason i would want to do a post-tax 401k instead of keeping it in a regular taxable brokerage account?




            Let's clarify what you mean by "post-tax 401k".



            First there is the Roth 401k, which behaves like a Roth IRA -- money that you contribute is taxed, but you pay no taxes on earnings when you withdraw them in retirement. However, a Roth 401k shares the same contribution pool as a Traditional 401k, so if your goal is to invest more money, this is not helpful -- every dollar you contribute to a Roth 401k is one less dollar you can contribute to a Traditional 401k, and vice versa.



            The second is rarer, and is not offered by many 401k providers; it is called spillover contributions, spillover elections, or excess elections. In this case (which, again, most 401k providers do not currently support), you can contribute money in excess of the normal contribution limit ($18,500 in 2018, $19,000 in 2019) to a Traditional 401k; however, it is not tax-deductible like normal contributions are.



            On the face of it, this is a bad move: you would pay income taxes on any earnings, which will be more than the long term capital gains you would pay on any earnings if it was just a brokerage account.



            However, being in a 401k, it can be rolled over into a Traditional IRA (though it would have the same problem), or into a Roth IRA. Since it has already been taxed, it generates no new taxes to convert it to a Roth IRA, and now any growth will be created tax free. Since the amount of spillover contributions you're allowed is quite large (in 2018, $36,500 minus whatever employer match you may have had), it functions very, very, very much like an additional, and quite possibly very large, Roth IRA contribution. This process -- making spillover contributions, and then rolling them over into a Roth IRA -- is called the megabackdoor Roth.



            Rolling the money over into a Roth IRA does require either that your 401k provider allow in service withdrawals, or that you leave your employer, however. If your 401k provider does not allow in service withdrawals, and you plan on staying with your employer for a significant number of years to come, the megabackdoor Roth may not be an appropriate choice.



            More information on the megabackdoor Roth can be found at Bogleheads or at the Mad Fientist.




            I can withdraw the money to invest in buy & hold real estate or other asset classes
            It can be withdrawn without penalties (but with taxes) for expenses outside of what an emergency fund would cover.




            Be aware that, as with other Roth IRA conversions, five years after you convert the money to a Roth IRA (either from a Roth 401k or via the megabackdoor Roth) you can withdraw that amount (though not any earnings) at any time without penalty.






            share|improve this answer













            With my additional savings is there any reason i would want to do a post-tax 401k instead of keeping it in a regular taxable brokerage account?




            Let's clarify what you mean by "post-tax 401k".



            First there is the Roth 401k, which behaves like a Roth IRA -- money that you contribute is taxed, but you pay no taxes on earnings when you withdraw them in retirement. However, a Roth 401k shares the same contribution pool as a Traditional 401k, so if your goal is to invest more money, this is not helpful -- every dollar you contribute to a Roth 401k is one less dollar you can contribute to a Traditional 401k, and vice versa.



            The second is rarer, and is not offered by many 401k providers; it is called spillover contributions, spillover elections, or excess elections. In this case (which, again, most 401k providers do not currently support), you can contribute money in excess of the normal contribution limit ($18,500 in 2018, $19,000 in 2019) to a Traditional 401k; however, it is not tax-deductible like normal contributions are.



            On the face of it, this is a bad move: you would pay income taxes on any earnings, which will be more than the long term capital gains you would pay on any earnings if it was just a brokerage account.



            However, being in a 401k, it can be rolled over into a Traditional IRA (though it would have the same problem), or into a Roth IRA. Since it has already been taxed, it generates no new taxes to convert it to a Roth IRA, and now any growth will be created tax free. Since the amount of spillover contributions you're allowed is quite large (in 2018, $36,500 minus whatever employer match you may have had), it functions very, very, very much like an additional, and quite possibly very large, Roth IRA contribution. This process -- making spillover contributions, and then rolling them over into a Roth IRA -- is called the megabackdoor Roth.



            Rolling the money over into a Roth IRA does require either that your 401k provider allow in service withdrawals, or that you leave your employer, however. If your 401k provider does not allow in service withdrawals, and you plan on staying with your employer for a significant number of years to come, the megabackdoor Roth may not be an appropriate choice.



            More information on the megabackdoor Roth can be found at Bogleheads or at the Mad Fientist.




            I can withdraw the money to invest in buy & hold real estate or other asset classes
            It can be withdrawn without penalties (but with taxes) for expenses outside of what an emergency fund would cover.




            Be aware that, as with other Roth IRA conversions, five years after you convert the money to a Roth IRA (either from a Roth 401k or via the megabackdoor Roth) you can withdraw that amount (though not any earnings) at any time without penalty.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 5 hours ago









            Magua

            4,507722




            4,507722











            • Great answer. If an employer allows both after tax 401k contributions and in-service withdrawals, then it's a no-brainer.
              – TTT
              4 hours ago
















            • Great answer. If an employer allows both after tax 401k contributions and in-service withdrawals, then it's a no-brainer.
              – TTT
              4 hours ago















            Great answer. If an employer allows both after tax 401k contributions and in-service withdrawals, then it's a no-brainer.
            – TTT
            4 hours ago




            Great answer. If an employer allows both after tax 401k contributions and in-service withdrawals, then it's a no-brainer.
            – TTT
            4 hours ago

















             

            draft saved


            draft discarded















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmoney.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f102017%2fpost-tax-401k-or-taxable-brokerage-account%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest













































































            Popular posts from this blog

            Peggy Mitchell

            Palaiologos

            The Forum (Inglewood, California)