Linking with GCC doesn't detect -fPIC flag

Multi tool use
Multi tool use

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I am trying to link some files. Here is my command: 



gcc -T linker.ld -o Stack Berry.bin -ffreestanding -O2 -nostlib kernel.o boot.o -fPIC -lgcc


How ever, I get this error:



/usr/bin/ld: boot.o: relocation R_X86_64_32 against `.multiboot' can not be used when making a PIE object; recompile with -fPIC
/usr/bin/ld: final link failed: Nonrepresentable section on output


I have included the -fPIC argument, have I just put it in the wrong place? I haven't been able to find any thing for the syntax for this flag. Thanks!






ld multiboot







share|improve this question







New contributor




Milo Banks is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.















  • 1




    The -fPIC option must be applied during the compile phase (the command that generates the object files) I think - rather than the link phase, as you are showing
    – steeldriver
    21 hours ago










  • faceplam. Thanks. Let me try it.
    – Milo Banks
    21 hours ago










  • It doesn't seem to work. I tried it on compiling the GAS code (not a arg), and the command that generates the object file. It does not seem to work. gcc -fPIC -c kernel.c -o kernel.o -std=gnu99 -ffreestanding -O2 -Wall -Wextra
    – Milo Banks
    21 hours ago










  • (1) My first guess (and it is only a guess) was that it’s a command-line order problem. Have you tried changing the order of the command line? (2) Actually reading the “recompile with -fPIC” error make me doubt my first guess and believe that @steeldriver has the right idea. … (Cont’d)
    – Scott
    20 hours ago











  • (Cont’d) …  (3) People will say that this question is off-topic here, and belongs on Stack Overflow. I believe that it’s on-topic here, but I agree that it is likely to get answered more quickly and accurately on Stack Overflow. If you don’t get an answer here, and the question doesn’t get migrated, I suggest that you flag it and ask to have it moved. Please don’t just repost the question.
    – Scott
    20 hours ago














up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I am trying to link some files. Here is my command: 



gcc -T linker.ld -o Stack Berry.bin -ffreestanding -O2 -nostlib kernel.o boot.o -fPIC -lgcc


How ever, I get this error:



/usr/bin/ld: boot.o: relocation R_X86_64_32 against `.multiboot' can not be used when making a PIE object; recompile with -fPIC
/usr/bin/ld: final link failed: Nonrepresentable section on output


I have included the -fPIC argument, have I just put it in the wrong place? I haven't been able to find any thing for the syntax for this flag. Thanks!






ld multiboot







share|improve this question







New contributor




Milo Banks is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.















  • 1




    The -fPIC option must be applied during the compile phase (the command that generates the object files) I think - rather than the link phase, as you are showing
    – steeldriver
    21 hours ago










  • faceplam. Thanks. Let me try it.
    – Milo Banks
    21 hours ago










  • It doesn't seem to work. I tried it on compiling the GAS code (not a arg), and the command that generates the object file. It does not seem to work. gcc -fPIC -c kernel.c -o kernel.o -std=gnu99 -ffreestanding -O2 -Wall -Wextra
    – Milo Banks
    21 hours ago










  • (1) My first guess (and it is only a guess) was that it’s a command-line order problem. Have you tried changing the order of the command line? (2) Actually reading the “recompile with -fPIC” error make me doubt my first guess and believe that @steeldriver has the right idea. … (Cont’d)
    – Scott
    20 hours ago











  • (Cont’d) …  (3) People will say that this question is off-topic here, and belongs on Stack Overflow. I believe that it’s on-topic here, but I agree that it is likely to get answered more quickly and accurately on Stack Overflow. If you don’t get an answer here, and the question doesn’t get migrated, I suggest that you flag it and ask to have it moved. Please don’t just repost the question.
    – Scott
    20 hours ago












up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











I am trying to link some files. Here is my command: 



gcc -T linker.ld -o Stack Berry.bin -ffreestanding -O2 -nostlib kernel.o boot.o -fPIC -lgcc


How ever, I get this error:



/usr/bin/ld: boot.o: relocation R_X86_64_32 against `.multiboot' can not be used when making a PIE object; recompile with -fPIC
/usr/bin/ld: final link failed: Nonrepresentable section on output


I have included the -fPIC argument, have I just put it in the wrong place? I haven't been able to find any thing for the syntax for this flag. Thanks!






ld multiboot







share|improve this question







New contributor




Milo Banks is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











I am trying to link some files. Here is my command: 



gcc -T linker.ld -o Stack Berry.bin -ffreestanding -O2 -nostlib kernel.o boot.o -fPIC -lgcc


How ever, I get this error:



/usr/bin/ld: boot.o: relocation R_X86_64_32 against `.multiboot' can not be used when making a PIE object; recompile with -fPIC
/usr/bin/ld: final link failed: Nonrepresentable section on output


I have included the -fPIC argument, have I just put it in the wrong place? I haven't been able to find any thing for the syntax for this flag. Thanks!






ld multiboot




ld multiboot






share|improve this question







New contributor




Milo Banks is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question







New contributor




Milo Banks is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor




Milo Banks is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 22 hours ago









Milo Banks

1




1




New contributor




Milo Banks is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Milo Banks is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Milo Banks is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







  • 1




    The -fPIC option must be applied during the compile phase (the command that generates the object files) I think - rather than the link phase, as you are showing
    – steeldriver
    21 hours ago










  • faceplam. Thanks. Let me try it.
    – Milo Banks
    21 hours ago










  • It doesn't seem to work. I tried it on compiling the GAS code (not a arg), and the command that generates the object file. It does not seem to work. gcc -fPIC -c kernel.c -o kernel.o -std=gnu99 -ffreestanding -O2 -Wall -Wextra
    – Milo Banks
    21 hours ago










  • (1) My first guess (and it is only a guess) was that it’s a command-line order problem. Have you tried changing the order of the command line? (2) Actually reading the “recompile with -fPIC” error make me doubt my first guess and believe that @steeldriver has the right idea. … (Cont’d)
    – Scott
    20 hours ago











  • (Cont’d) …  (3) People will say that this question is off-topic here, and belongs on Stack Overflow. I believe that it’s on-topic here, but I agree that it is likely to get answered more quickly and accurately on Stack Overflow. If you don’t get an answer here, and the question doesn’t get migrated, I suggest that you flag it and ask to have it moved. Please don’t just repost the question.
    – Scott
    20 hours ago












  • 1




    The -fPIC option must be applied during the compile phase (the command that generates the object files) I think - rather than the link phase, as you are showing
    – steeldriver
    21 hours ago










  • faceplam. Thanks. Let me try it.
    – Milo Banks
    21 hours ago










  • It doesn't seem to work. I tried it on compiling the GAS code (not a arg), and the command that generates the object file. It does not seem to work. gcc -fPIC -c kernel.c -o kernel.o -std=gnu99 -ffreestanding -O2 -Wall -Wextra
    – Milo Banks
    21 hours ago










  • (1) My first guess (and it is only a guess) was that it’s a command-line order problem. Have you tried changing the order of the command line? (2) Actually reading the “recompile with -fPIC” error make me doubt my first guess and believe that @steeldriver has the right idea. … (Cont’d)
    – Scott
    20 hours ago











  • (Cont’d) …  (3) People will say that this question is off-topic here, and belongs on Stack Overflow. I believe that it’s on-topic here, but I agree that it is likely to get answered more quickly and accurately on Stack Overflow. If you don’t get an answer here, and the question doesn’t get migrated, I suggest that you flag it and ask to have it moved. Please don’t just repost the question.
    – Scott
    20 hours ago







1




1




The -fPIC option must be applied during the compile phase (the command that generates the object files) I think - rather than the link phase, as you are showing
– steeldriver
21 hours ago




The -fPIC option must be applied during the compile phase (the command that generates the object files) I think - rather than the link phase, as you are showing
– steeldriver
21 hours ago












faceplam. Thanks. Let me try it.
– Milo Banks
21 hours ago




faceplam. Thanks. Let me try it.
– Milo Banks
21 hours ago












It doesn't seem to work. I tried it on compiling the GAS code (not a arg), and the command that generates the object file. It does not seem to work. gcc -fPIC -c kernel.c -o kernel.o -std=gnu99 -ffreestanding -O2 -Wall -Wextra
– Milo Banks
21 hours ago




It doesn't seem to work. I tried it on compiling the GAS code (not a arg), and the command that generates the object file. It does not seem to work. gcc -fPIC -c kernel.c -o kernel.o -std=gnu99 -ffreestanding -O2 -Wall -Wextra
– Milo Banks
21 hours ago












(1) My first guess (and it is only a guess) was that it’s a command-line order problem. Have you tried changing the order of the command line? (2) Actually reading the “recompile with -fPIC” error make me doubt my first guess and believe that @steeldriver has the right idea. … (Cont’d)
– Scott
20 hours ago





(1) My first guess (and it is only a guess) was that it’s a command-line order problem. Have you tried changing the order of the command line? (2) Actually reading the “recompile with -fPIC” error make me doubt my first guess and believe that @steeldriver has the right idea. … (Cont’d)
– Scott
20 hours ago













(Cont’d) …  (3) People will say that this question is off-topic here, and belongs on Stack Overflow. I believe that it’s on-topic here, but I agree that it is likely to get answered more quickly and accurately on Stack Overflow. If you don’t get an answer here, and the question doesn’t get migrated, I suggest that you flag it and ask to have it moved. Please don’t just repost the question.
– Scott
20 hours ago




(Cont’d) …  (3) People will say that this question is off-topic here, and belongs on Stack Overflow. I believe that it’s on-topic here, but I agree that it is likely to get answered more quickly and accurately on Stack Overflow. If you don’t get an answer here, and the question doesn’t get migrated, I suggest that you flag it and ask to have it moved. Please don’t just repost the question.
– Scott
20 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
0
down vote













Your boot.o has a .multiboot elf section, which is incompatible with -fPIC. You can try to compile boot.o with -fPIC but that should fail.



See https://www.gnu.org/software/grub/manual/multiboot/multiboot.html#OS-image-format for the header.



On the other hand, there's little sense in creating a bootable object with -fPIC. Even if there was a "dynamic loader", there can't be anything to dynamically link against during the boot process.






share|improve this answer




















  • I could only find info on the header and the flag value, and it matched up with my boot.s. BTW the boot.o is an object file, non-compilable, as it should be boot.s.
    – Milo Banks
    21 hours ago











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);






Milo Banks is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f481358%2flinking-with-gcc-doesnt-detect-fpic-flag%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest

















1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
0
down vote













Your boot.o has a .multiboot elf section, which is incompatible with -fPIC. You can try to compile boot.o with -fPIC but that should fail.



See https://www.gnu.org/software/grub/manual/multiboot/multiboot.html#OS-image-format for the header.



On the other hand, there's little sense in creating a bootable object with -fPIC. Even if there was a "dynamic loader", there can't be anything to dynamically link against during the boot process.






share|improve this answer




















  • I could only find info on the header and the flag value, and it matched up with my boot.s. BTW the boot.o is an object file, non-compilable, as it should be boot.s.
    – Milo Banks
    21 hours ago















up vote
0
down vote













Your boot.o has a .multiboot elf section, which is incompatible with -fPIC. You can try to compile boot.o with -fPIC but that should fail.



See https://www.gnu.org/software/grub/manual/multiboot/multiboot.html#OS-image-format for the header.



On the other hand, there's little sense in creating a bootable object with -fPIC. Even if there was a "dynamic loader", there can't be anything to dynamically link against during the boot process.






share|improve this answer




















  • I could only find info on the header and the flag value, and it matched up with my boot.s. BTW the boot.o is an object file, non-compilable, as it should be boot.s.
    – Milo Banks
    21 hours ago













up vote
0
down vote










up vote
0
down vote









Your boot.o has a .multiboot elf section, which is incompatible with -fPIC. You can try to compile boot.o with -fPIC but that should fail.



See https://www.gnu.org/software/grub/manual/multiboot/multiboot.html#OS-image-format for the header.



On the other hand, there's little sense in creating a bootable object with -fPIC. Even if there was a "dynamic loader", there can't be anything to dynamically link against during the boot process.






share|improve this answer












Your boot.o has a .multiboot elf section, which is incompatible with -fPIC. You can try to compile boot.o with -fPIC but that should fail.



See https://www.gnu.org/software/grub/manual/multiboot/multiboot.html#OS-image-format for the header.



On the other hand, there's little sense in creating a bootable object with -fPIC. Even if there was a "dynamic loader", there can't be anything to dynamically link against during the boot process.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 21 hours ago









V13

2,646613




2,646613











  • I could only find info on the header and the flag value, and it matched up with my boot.s. BTW the boot.o is an object file, non-compilable, as it should be boot.s.
    – Milo Banks
    21 hours ago

















  • I could only find info on the header and the flag value, and it matched up with my boot.s. BTW the boot.o is an object file, non-compilable, as it should be boot.s.
    – Milo Banks
    21 hours ago
















I could only find info on the header and the flag value, and it matched up with my boot.s. BTW the boot.o is an object file, non-compilable, as it should be boot.s.
– Milo Banks
21 hours ago





I could only find info on the header and the flag value, and it matched up with my boot.s. BTW the boot.o is an object file, non-compilable, as it should be boot.s.
– Milo Banks
21 hours ago











Milo Banks is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









 

draft saved


draft discarded


















Milo Banks is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












Milo Banks is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











Milo Banks is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f481358%2flinking-with-gcc-doesnt-detect-fpic-flag%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest
































































tFH 9bfJfwcIpx23jaNIAQ TWS 7Suz
-
ms 1D,qT9hqX8a9jBMeG8,xLgsOoYayAPwlHim HakSQPoBwL SO,poZtU2X 4w8q1qdKIHGhXaxw4UA2,2IqL

Popular posts from this blog

How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

Image
Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 1 down vote favorite I'm using WordPress 4.9.8, CiviCRM to 5.5.1, I usually send email to contact by Search> Find contacts View contact details Action> Send email Send email ok, Contact received mail ok like picture But status only Email sent though contact read email or not. So, can CiviCRM can change status to Email read when contact read email? wordpress email share | improve this question asked Sep 26 at 0:12 ToanLuong 49 9 add a comment  |  up vote 1 down vote favorite I'm using WordPress 4.9.8, CiviCRM to 5.5.1, I usually send email to contact by Search> Find contacts View contact details Action> Send email Send email ok, Contact received mail ok like picture But status only Email sent though contact read email or not. So, can CiviCRM can change status to Email read when contact read email? wordpress email share | improve this questi...
Read more

How many registers does an x86_64 CPU actually have?

Image
Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 2 down vote favorite I am currently learning reverse engineering and am studying the flags register. I had in my mind that rflags was just another name for one of the 16 general purpose registers, for example rax or rbx . But it looks like rflags is actually an additional register. So that makes 17 registers in total... how many more could there be? I have spent at least an hour on this and found numerous different answers. The best answer so far is this, which says that there are 40 registers in total. 16 General Purpose Registers 2 Status Registers 6 Code Segment Registers 16 SSE Registers 8 FPU/MMX Registers But if I add that up, I get 48. Could anybody provide an official answer on how many registers an x86_64 CPU has (e.g. an Intel i7). Additionally, I have seen references to 'hardware' and 'architectural' registers. What are those registers and how many are there? register x86-64 share | improve this...
Read more

Displaying single band from multi-band raster using QGIS

Image
Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP 1 How can I extract a single band from multi-band raster in QGIS? I have an remote sensed image which has 6 bands (including NDVI band), I want to display each band separately, but have no idea how to do. I have seen some questions similar here but none worked for me. The original image (has 6 bands) is: I want to display the band 6 which should be like this: But I tried gdal_translate, and couldn't get the correct result. What I have got is: qgis raster multi-band share | improve this question edited Mar 5 at 0:53 Summer asked Mar 4 at 6:42 Summer Summer 23 6 Is this any help gis.stackexchange.com/questions/220658/… ? if not gis.stackexchange.com/questions/62133/… might help. – Michael Stimson Mar 4 at 6:46 Thanks for answering but when I used gdal_translate, qgis showed that 'Error 4: Kayena.tif: No such file or directory". Would you know how to fi...
Read more