Does mosh save bandwidth?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
The mobile shell claims many benefits, especially with mobile connections. Many mobile plan prices scale with the amount of data transferred. So I wonder whether I can use Mosh to cut down in data usage. A tutorial on DigitalOcean states that
Mosh [...] will only communicate changes to the currently visible screen area. This allows it to radically reduce the bandwidth [...]
But does not give any statistics on how much bandwidth is gained and whether this really weighs out the additional overhead of establishing and maintaining a connection via UDP.
Are there any tests, experiences that compare SSH to Mosh in real-world-scenarios, especially
- used with screen or tmux,
- on a mobile connection while moving between different connection modes or cell towers,
- for long-lived sessions?
ssh bandwidth mosh
edited Sep 22 at 12:32
Jeff Schaller
33.3k849111
asked Dec 3 '15 at 12:01
XZS
884520
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
The mobile shell claims many benefits, especially with mobile connections. Many mobile plan prices scale with the amount of data transferred. So I wonder whether I can use Mosh to cut down in data usage. A tutorial on DigitalOcean states that
Mosh [...] will only communicate changes to the currently visible screen area. This allows it to radically reduce the bandwidth [...]
But does not give any statistics on how much bandwidth is gained and whether this really weighs out the additional overhead of establishing and maintaining a connection via UDP.
Are there any tests, experiences that compare SSH to Mosh in real-world-scenarios, especially
- used with screen or tmux,
- on a mobile connection while moving between different connection modes or cell towers,
- for long-lived sessions?
ssh bandwidth mosh
edited Sep 22 at 12:32
Jeff Schaller
33.3k849111
asked Dec 3 '15 at 12:01
XZS
884520
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
The mobile shell claims many benefits, especially with mobile connections. Many mobile plan prices scale with the amount of data transferred. So I wonder whether I can use Mosh to cut down in data usage. A tutorial on DigitalOcean states that
Mosh [...] will only communicate changes to the currently visible screen area. This allows it to radically reduce the bandwidth [...]
But does not give any statistics on how much bandwidth is gained and whether this really weighs out the additional overhead of establishing and maintaining a connection via UDP.
Are there any tests, experiences that compare SSH to Mosh in real-world-scenarios, especially
- used with screen or tmux,
- on a mobile connection while moving between different connection modes or cell towers,
- for long-lived sessions?
ssh bandwidth mosh
edited Sep 22 at 12:32
Jeff Schaller
33.3k849111
asked Dec 3 '15 at 12:01
XZS
884520
The mobile shell claims many benefits, especially with mobile connections. Many mobile plan prices scale with the amount of data transferred. So I wonder whether I can use Mosh to cut down in data usage. A tutorial on DigitalOcean states that
Mosh [...] will only communicate changes to the currently visible screen area. This allows it to radically reduce the bandwidth [...]
But does not give any statistics on how much bandwidth is gained and whether this really weighs out the additional overhead of establishing and maintaining a connection via UDP.
Are there any tests, experiences that compare SSH to Mosh in real-world-scenarios, especially
- used with screen or tmux,
- on a mobile connection while moving between different connection modes or cell towers,
- for long-lived sessions?
ssh bandwidth mosh
ssh bandwidth mosh
edited Sep 22 at 12:32
Jeff Schaller
33.3k849111
asked Dec 3 '15 at 12:01
XZS
884520
edited Sep 22 at 12:32
Jeff Schaller
33.3k849111
asked Dec 3 '15 at 12:01
XZS
884520
edited Sep 22 at 12:32
Jeff Schaller
33.3k849111
edited Sep 22 at 12:32
Jeff Schaller
33.3k849111
edited Sep 22 at 12:32
Jeff Schaller
33.3k849111
33.3k849111
asked Dec 3 '15 at 12:01
XZS
884520
asked Dec 3 '15 at 12:01
XZS
884520
asked Dec 3 '15 at 12:01
XZS
884520
884520
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
Mosh will probably increase your data usage. It is designed to increase reliability and responsiveness, or at least the illusion of it.
From this discussion, we know that mosh's predictive capabilities actually causes an extra packet being sent per keystroke. If you are concerned about metered data usage, you might want to use the lowbandwidth branch of mosh.
answered Jun 20 '16 at 9:10
hanxue
386214
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
Mosh will probably increase your data usage. It is designed to increase reliability and responsiveness, or at least the illusion of it.
From this discussion, we know that mosh's predictive capabilities actually causes an extra packet being sent per keystroke. If you are concerned about metered data usage, you might want to use the lowbandwidth branch of mosh.
answered Jun 20 '16 at 9:10
hanxue
386214
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
Mosh will probably increase your data usage. It is designed to increase reliability and responsiveness, or at least the illusion of it.
From this discussion, we know that mosh's predictive capabilities actually causes an extra packet being sent per keystroke. If you are concerned about metered data usage, you might want to use the lowbandwidth branch of mosh.
answered Jun 20 '16 at 9:10
hanxue
386214
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
Mosh will probably increase your data usage. It is designed to increase reliability and responsiveness, or at least the illusion of it.
From this discussion, we know that mosh's predictive capabilities actually causes an extra packet being sent per keystroke. If you are concerned about metered data usage, you might want to use the lowbandwidth branch of mosh.
answered Jun 20 '16 at 9:10
hanxue
386214
Mosh will probably increase your data usage. It is designed to increase reliability and responsiveness, or at least the illusion of it.
From this discussion, we know that mosh's predictive capabilities actually causes an extra packet being sent per keystroke. If you are concerned about metered data usage, you might want to use the lowbandwidth branch of mosh.
answered Jun 20 '16 at 9:10
hanxue
386214
answered Jun 20 '16 at 9:10
hanxue
386214
answered Jun 20 '16 at 9:10
hanxue
386214
answered Jun 20 '16 at 9:10
hanxue
386214
386214
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f247109%2fdoes-mosh-save-bandwidth%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password