What is meant by “infinitely often” in this problem on Borel sets?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
2
down vote

favorite












As the title suggests, I am having some trouble understanding an exercise regarding Borel sets. In particular I am trying to




Show that the set of real numbers that have a decimal expansion with
the digit $5$ appearing infinitely often is a Borel set.




My question here is what is meant by the phrase "infinitely often" in this case? I have never seen this phrase before in a formal context. This attempt of mine is horrific so don't butcher me, but I tried starting out in the following way:




Let $mathcalA_5$ denote the set of real numbers that have a decimal expansion with the digit $5$ appearing infinitely often, i.e. every $ainmathcalA_5$ can be written as $$a=ldots+ 5cdot10^n+5cdot10^n-1+ldots+5cdot 10 +5+5cdot10^-1+ldots 5cdot10^-m-1+5cdot10^-m+ldots$$




Am I interpreting "infinitely often" correct here? If not, what is it trying to say?










share|cite|improve this question

























    up vote
    2
    down vote

    favorite












    As the title suggests, I am having some trouble understanding an exercise regarding Borel sets. In particular I am trying to




    Show that the set of real numbers that have a decimal expansion with
    the digit $5$ appearing infinitely often is a Borel set.




    My question here is what is meant by the phrase "infinitely often" in this case? I have never seen this phrase before in a formal context. This attempt of mine is horrific so don't butcher me, but I tried starting out in the following way:




    Let $mathcalA_5$ denote the set of real numbers that have a decimal expansion with the digit $5$ appearing infinitely often, i.e. every $ainmathcalA_5$ can be written as $$a=ldots+ 5cdot10^n+5cdot10^n-1+ldots+5cdot 10 +5+5cdot10^-1+ldots 5cdot10^-m-1+5cdot10^-m+ldots$$




    Am I interpreting "infinitely often" correct here? If not, what is it trying to say?










    share|cite|improve this question























      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite











      As the title suggests, I am having some trouble understanding an exercise regarding Borel sets. In particular I am trying to




      Show that the set of real numbers that have a decimal expansion with
      the digit $5$ appearing infinitely often is a Borel set.




      My question here is what is meant by the phrase "infinitely often" in this case? I have never seen this phrase before in a formal context. This attempt of mine is horrific so don't butcher me, but I tried starting out in the following way:




      Let $mathcalA_5$ denote the set of real numbers that have a decimal expansion with the digit $5$ appearing infinitely often, i.e. every $ainmathcalA_5$ can be written as $$a=ldots+ 5cdot10^n+5cdot10^n-1+ldots+5cdot 10 +5+5cdot10^-1+ldots 5cdot10^-m-1+5cdot10^-m+ldots$$




      Am I interpreting "infinitely often" correct here? If not, what is it trying to say?










      share|cite|improve this question













      As the title suggests, I am having some trouble understanding an exercise regarding Borel sets. In particular I am trying to




      Show that the set of real numbers that have a decimal expansion with
      the digit $5$ appearing infinitely often is a Borel set.




      My question here is what is meant by the phrase "infinitely often" in this case? I have never seen this phrase before in a formal context. This attempt of mine is horrific so don't butcher me, but I tried starting out in the following way:




      Let $mathcalA_5$ denote the set of real numbers that have a decimal expansion with the digit $5$ appearing infinitely often, i.e. every $ainmathcalA_5$ can be written as $$a=ldots+ 5cdot10^n+5cdot10^n-1+ldots+5cdot 10 +5+5cdot10^-1+ldots 5cdot10^-m-1+5cdot10^-m+ldots$$




      Am I interpreting "infinitely often" correct here? If not, what is it trying to say?







      real-analysis measure-theory borel-sets






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Sep 22 at 4:54









      Thy Art is Math

      402211




      402211




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          4
          down vote



          accepted










          The phrase means just this; if $$a_k 10^k + a_k-1 10^k-1 + dots + a_0 + a_-1 10^-1 + a_-2 10^-2 + cdots$$
          is the decimal expansion of a real number, then the set
          $$
          n : a_n = 5, -infty < n leq k
          $$

          is an infinite set.




          Pulled up from the comments below: to elaborate, the given condition means that there is some infinite subsequence of $5$'s in the sequence $( a_n )$.



          Take care that it does not mean that all $a_n$'s are $5$, or that all $a_n$'s after a certain point are $5$. For example, you could have that $a_n = 5$ whenever $n$ is even and $a_n = 7$ whenever $n$ is odd. This is a number whose decimal expansion contains infinitely many $5$'s, but it also contains infinitely many non-$5$'s.






          share|cite|improve this answer






















          • So, in other words, there is some infinite "string" of $5$'s in each number in this set of real numbers?
            – Thy Art is Math
            Sep 22 at 5:09







          • 1




            @ThyArtisMath Yes, there is some infinite string in the sequence $( a_n )$. Take care that it does not mean that all $a_n$'s are $5$, or that all $a_n$'s after a certain point are $5$. For example, you could have that $a_n = 5$ whenever $n$ is even and $a_n = 7$ whenever $n$ is odd. This is a number whose decimal expansion contains infinitely many $5$'s, but it also contains infinitely many non-$5$'s.
            – Brahadeesh
            Sep 22 at 5:13











          • Got it! Thank you for the example -- that makes sense to me now!
            – Thy Art is Math
            Sep 22 at 5:15






          • 1




            @ThyArtisMath Glad to be of help. :)
            – Brahadeesh
            Sep 22 at 5:18

















          up vote
          3
          down vote













          "Infinitely often" means "infinitely many times". In other words, of all of the digits in the decimal expansion of your number, infinitely many of them are $5$. It doesn't mean that all of them are $5$, or even that "most" of them are $5$ in any sense, just that there are infinitely many $5$s.






          share|cite|improve this answer




















          • Ah, that makes sense. Thank you for the clarification. Would you happen to have any suggestions for a way in which I can explicitly write such a number mathematically? Or do you think that writing that out would be unhelpful in this case?
            – Thy Art is Math
            Sep 22 at 5:05






          • 1




            I doubt such a representation would be helpful. That would be essentially writing your set as the image of some function, but that is not likely to be helpful for showing it is Borel since an image of a Borel set under a Borel function need not be Borel
            – Eric Wofsey
            Sep 22 at 5:08










          • Ah ok, I did not know that. Thanks for your feedback!
            – Thy Art is Math
            Sep 22 at 5:13










          Your Answer




          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: false,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2926196%2fwhat-is-meant-by-infinitely-often-in-this-problem-on-borel-sets%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest






























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          4
          down vote



          accepted










          The phrase means just this; if $$a_k 10^k + a_k-1 10^k-1 + dots + a_0 + a_-1 10^-1 + a_-2 10^-2 + cdots$$
          is the decimal expansion of a real number, then the set
          $$
          n : a_n = 5, -infty < n leq k
          $$

          is an infinite set.




          Pulled up from the comments below: to elaborate, the given condition means that there is some infinite subsequence of $5$'s in the sequence $( a_n )$.



          Take care that it does not mean that all $a_n$'s are $5$, or that all $a_n$'s after a certain point are $5$. For example, you could have that $a_n = 5$ whenever $n$ is even and $a_n = 7$ whenever $n$ is odd. This is a number whose decimal expansion contains infinitely many $5$'s, but it also contains infinitely many non-$5$'s.






          share|cite|improve this answer






















          • So, in other words, there is some infinite "string" of $5$'s in each number in this set of real numbers?
            – Thy Art is Math
            Sep 22 at 5:09







          • 1




            @ThyArtisMath Yes, there is some infinite string in the sequence $( a_n )$. Take care that it does not mean that all $a_n$'s are $5$, or that all $a_n$'s after a certain point are $5$. For example, you could have that $a_n = 5$ whenever $n$ is even and $a_n = 7$ whenever $n$ is odd. This is a number whose decimal expansion contains infinitely many $5$'s, but it also contains infinitely many non-$5$'s.
            – Brahadeesh
            Sep 22 at 5:13











          • Got it! Thank you for the example -- that makes sense to me now!
            – Thy Art is Math
            Sep 22 at 5:15






          • 1




            @ThyArtisMath Glad to be of help. :)
            – Brahadeesh
            Sep 22 at 5:18














          up vote
          4
          down vote



          accepted










          The phrase means just this; if $$a_k 10^k + a_k-1 10^k-1 + dots + a_0 + a_-1 10^-1 + a_-2 10^-2 + cdots$$
          is the decimal expansion of a real number, then the set
          $$
          n : a_n = 5, -infty < n leq k
          $$

          is an infinite set.




          Pulled up from the comments below: to elaborate, the given condition means that there is some infinite subsequence of $5$'s in the sequence $( a_n )$.



          Take care that it does not mean that all $a_n$'s are $5$, or that all $a_n$'s after a certain point are $5$. For example, you could have that $a_n = 5$ whenever $n$ is even and $a_n = 7$ whenever $n$ is odd. This is a number whose decimal expansion contains infinitely many $5$'s, but it also contains infinitely many non-$5$'s.






          share|cite|improve this answer






















          • So, in other words, there is some infinite "string" of $5$'s in each number in this set of real numbers?
            – Thy Art is Math
            Sep 22 at 5:09







          • 1




            @ThyArtisMath Yes, there is some infinite string in the sequence $( a_n )$. Take care that it does not mean that all $a_n$'s are $5$, or that all $a_n$'s after a certain point are $5$. For example, you could have that $a_n = 5$ whenever $n$ is even and $a_n = 7$ whenever $n$ is odd. This is a number whose decimal expansion contains infinitely many $5$'s, but it also contains infinitely many non-$5$'s.
            – Brahadeesh
            Sep 22 at 5:13











          • Got it! Thank you for the example -- that makes sense to me now!
            – Thy Art is Math
            Sep 22 at 5:15






          • 1




            @ThyArtisMath Glad to be of help. :)
            – Brahadeesh
            Sep 22 at 5:18












          up vote
          4
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          4
          down vote



          accepted






          The phrase means just this; if $$a_k 10^k + a_k-1 10^k-1 + dots + a_0 + a_-1 10^-1 + a_-2 10^-2 + cdots$$
          is the decimal expansion of a real number, then the set
          $$
          n : a_n = 5, -infty < n leq k
          $$

          is an infinite set.




          Pulled up from the comments below: to elaborate, the given condition means that there is some infinite subsequence of $5$'s in the sequence $( a_n )$.



          Take care that it does not mean that all $a_n$'s are $5$, or that all $a_n$'s after a certain point are $5$. For example, you could have that $a_n = 5$ whenever $n$ is even and $a_n = 7$ whenever $n$ is odd. This is a number whose decimal expansion contains infinitely many $5$'s, but it also contains infinitely many non-$5$'s.






          share|cite|improve this answer














          The phrase means just this; if $$a_k 10^k + a_k-1 10^k-1 + dots + a_0 + a_-1 10^-1 + a_-2 10^-2 + cdots$$
          is the decimal expansion of a real number, then the set
          $$
          n : a_n = 5, -infty < n leq k
          $$

          is an infinite set.




          Pulled up from the comments below: to elaborate, the given condition means that there is some infinite subsequence of $5$'s in the sequence $( a_n )$.



          Take care that it does not mean that all $a_n$'s are $5$, or that all $a_n$'s after a certain point are $5$. For example, you could have that $a_n = 5$ whenever $n$ is even and $a_n = 7$ whenever $n$ is odd. This is a number whose decimal expansion contains infinitely many $5$'s, but it also contains infinitely many non-$5$'s.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Sep 22 at 5:17

























          answered Sep 22 at 5:06









          Brahadeesh

          4,73431853




          4,73431853











          • So, in other words, there is some infinite "string" of $5$'s in each number in this set of real numbers?
            – Thy Art is Math
            Sep 22 at 5:09







          • 1




            @ThyArtisMath Yes, there is some infinite string in the sequence $( a_n )$. Take care that it does not mean that all $a_n$'s are $5$, or that all $a_n$'s after a certain point are $5$. For example, you could have that $a_n = 5$ whenever $n$ is even and $a_n = 7$ whenever $n$ is odd. This is a number whose decimal expansion contains infinitely many $5$'s, but it also contains infinitely many non-$5$'s.
            – Brahadeesh
            Sep 22 at 5:13











          • Got it! Thank you for the example -- that makes sense to me now!
            – Thy Art is Math
            Sep 22 at 5:15






          • 1




            @ThyArtisMath Glad to be of help. :)
            – Brahadeesh
            Sep 22 at 5:18
















          • So, in other words, there is some infinite "string" of $5$'s in each number in this set of real numbers?
            – Thy Art is Math
            Sep 22 at 5:09







          • 1




            @ThyArtisMath Yes, there is some infinite string in the sequence $( a_n )$. Take care that it does not mean that all $a_n$'s are $5$, or that all $a_n$'s after a certain point are $5$. For example, you could have that $a_n = 5$ whenever $n$ is even and $a_n = 7$ whenever $n$ is odd. This is a number whose decimal expansion contains infinitely many $5$'s, but it also contains infinitely many non-$5$'s.
            – Brahadeesh
            Sep 22 at 5:13











          • Got it! Thank you for the example -- that makes sense to me now!
            – Thy Art is Math
            Sep 22 at 5:15






          • 1




            @ThyArtisMath Glad to be of help. :)
            – Brahadeesh
            Sep 22 at 5:18















          So, in other words, there is some infinite "string" of $5$'s in each number in this set of real numbers?
          – Thy Art is Math
          Sep 22 at 5:09





          So, in other words, there is some infinite "string" of $5$'s in each number in this set of real numbers?
          – Thy Art is Math
          Sep 22 at 5:09





          1




          1




          @ThyArtisMath Yes, there is some infinite string in the sequence $( a_n )$. Take care that it does not mean that all $a_n$'s are $5$, or that all $a_n$'s after a certain point are $5$. For example, you could have that $a_n = 5$ whenever $n$ is even and $a_n = 7$ whenever $n$ is odd. This is a number whose decimal expansion contains infinitely many $5$'s, but it also contains infinitely many non-$5$'s.
          – Brahadeesh
          Sep 22 at 5:13





          @ThyArtisMath Yes, there is some infinite string in the sequence $( a_n )$. Take care that it does not mean that all $a_n$'s are $5$, or that all $a_n$'s after a certain point are $5$. For example, you could have that $a_n = 5$ whenever $n$ is even and $a_n = 7$ whenever $n$ is odd. This is a number whose decimal expansion contains infinitely many $5$'s, but it also contains infinitely many non-$5$'s.
          – Brahadeesh
          Sep 22 at 5:13













          Got it! Thank you for the example -- that makes sense to me now!
          – Thy Art is Math
          Sep 22 at 5:15




          Got it! Thank you for the example -- that makes sense to me now!
          – Thy Art is Math
          Sep 22 at 5:15




          1




          1




          @ThyArtisMath Glad to be of help. :)
          – Brahadeesh
          Sep 22 at 5:18




          @ThyArtisMath Glad to be of help. :)
          – Brahadeesh
          Sep 22 at 5:18










          up vote
          3
          down vote













          "Infinitely often" means "infinitely many times". In other words, of all of the digits in the decimal expansion of your number, infinitely many of them are $5$. It doesn't mean that all of them are $5$, or even that "most" of them are $5$ in any sense, just that there are infinitely many $5$s.






          share|cite|improve this answer




















          • Ah, that makes sense. Thank you for the clarification. Would you happen to have any suggestions for a way in which I can explicitly write such a number mathematically? Or do you think that writing that out would be unhelpful in this case?
            – Thy Art is Math
            Sep 22 at 5:05






          • 1




            I doubt such a representation would be helpful. That would be essentially writing your set as the image of some function, but that is not likely to be helpful for showing it is Borel since an image of a Borel set under a Borel function need not be Borel
            – Eric Wofsey
            Sep 22 at 5:08










          • Ah ok, I did not know that. Thanks for your feedback!
            – Thy Art is Math
            Sep 22 at 5:13














          up vote
          3
          down vote













          "Infinitely often" means "infinitely many times". In other words, of all of the digits in the decimal expansion of your number, infinitely many of them are $5$. It doesn't mean that all of them are $5$, or even that "most" of them are $5$ in any sense, just that there are infinitely many $5$s.






          share|cite|improve this answer




















          • Ah, that makes sense. Thank you for the clarification. Would you happen to have any suggestions for a way in which I can explicitly write such a number mathematically? Or do you think that writing that out would be unhelpful in this case?
            – Thy Art is Math
            Sep 22 at 5:05






          • 1




            I doubt such a representation would be helpful. That would be essentially writing your set as the image of some function, but that is not likely to be helpful for showing it is Borel since an image of a Borel set under a Borel function need not be Borel
            – Eric Wofsey
            Sep 22 at 5:08










          • Ah ok, I did not know that. Thanks for your feedback!
            – Thy Art is Math
            Sep 22 at 5:13












          up vote
          3
          down vote










          up vote
          3
          down vote









          "Infinitely often" means "infinitely many times". In other words, of all of the digits in the decimal expansion of your number, infinitely many of them are $5$. It doesn't mean that all of them are $5$, or even that "most" of them are $5$ in any sense, just that there are infinitely many $5$s.






          share|cite|improve this answer












          "Infinitely often" means "infinitely many times". In other words, of all of the digits in the decimal expansion of your number, infinitely many of them are $5$. It doesn't mean that all of them are $5$, or even that "most" of them are $5$ in any sense, just that there are infinitely many $5$s.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Sep 22 at 4:59









          Eric Wofsey

          169k12196313




          169k12196313











          • Ah, that makes sense. Thank you for the clarification. Would you happen to have any suggestions for a way in which I can explicitly write such a number mathematically? Or do you think that writing that out would be unhelpful in this case?
            – Thy Art is Math
            Sep 22 at 5:05






          • 1




            I doubt such a representation would be helpful. That would be essentially writing your set as the image of some function, but that is not likely to be helpful for showing it is Borel since an image of a Borel set under a Borel function need not be Borel
            – Eric Wofsey
            Sep 22 at 5:08










          • Ah ok, I did not know that. Thanks for your feedback!
            – Thy Art is Math
            Sep 22 at 5:13
















          • Ah, that makes sense. Thank you for the clarification. Would you happen to have any suggestions for a way in which I can explicitly write such a number mathematically? Or do you think that writing that out would be unhelpful in this case?
            – Thy Art is Math
            Sep 22 at 5:05






          • 1




            I doubt such a representation would be helpful. That would be essentially writing your set as the image of some function, but that is not likely to be helpful for showing it is Borel since an image of a Borel set under a Borel function need not be Borel
            – Eric Wofsey
            Sep 22 at 5:08










          • Ah ok, I did not know that. Thanks for your feedback!
            – Thy Art is Math
            Sep 22 at 5:13















          Ah, that makes sense. Thank you for the clarification. Would you happen to have any suggestions for a way in which I can explicitly write such a number mathematically? Or do you think that writing that out would be unhelpful in this case?
          – Thy Art is Math
          Sep 22 at 5:05




          Ah, that makes sense. Thank you for the clarification. Would you happen to have any suggestions for a way in which I can explicitly write such a number mathematically? Or do you think that writing that out would be unhelpful in this case?
          – Thy Art is Math
          Sep 22 at 5:05




          1




          1




          I doubt such a representation would be helpful. That would be essentially writing your set as the image of some function, but that is not likely to be helpful for showing it is Borel since an image of a Borel set under a Borel function need not be Borel
          – Eric Wofsey
          Sep 22 at 5:08




          I doubt such a representation would be helpful. That would be essentially writing your set as the image of some function, but that is not likely to be helpful for showing it is Borel since an image of a Borel set under a Borel function need not be Borel
          – Eric Wofsey
          Sep 22 at 5:08












          Ah ok, I did not know that. Thanks for your feedback!
          – Thy Art is Math
          Sep 22 at 5:13




          Ah ok, I did not know that. Thanks for your feedback!
          – Thy Art is Math
          Sep 22 at 5:13

















           

          draft saved


          draft discarded















































           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2926196%2fwhat-is-meant-by-infinitely-often-in-this-problem-on-borel-sets%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest













































































          Popular posts from this blog

          How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

          Bahrain

          Postfix configuration issue with fips on centos 7; mailgun relay