Alternative source of fuel instead of wood

Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
16
down vote
favorite
In my world, humans live on an island. The island is not real big, there is a volcano, a river around which is a marsh.The forest on the island is sacred for them so they cannot enter it and cannot harvest any trees.
They use mud for construction but I can't figure out what would they use as fuel
I was thinking of palm wood but there would have to be quite a lot of these I guess. And I forgot to mention that they are bronze age.
Any tips or suggestions?
natural-resources fuels
 |Â
show 8 more comments
up vote
16
down vote
favorite
In my world, humans live on an island. The island is not real big, there is a volcano, a river around which is a marsh.The forest on the island is sacred for them so they cannot enter it and cannot harvest any trees.
They use mud for construction but I can't figure out what would they use as fuel
I was thinking of palm wood but there would have to be quite a lot of these I guess. And I forgot to mention that they are bronze age.
Any tips or suggestions?
natural-resources fuels
4
Can they use driftwood on the beach? Do they have large ungulates that leave big plops around?
â user535733
Sep 21 at 19:12
1
This seems like a hard site to make duplicates for, but someone asked something very similar a month or so ago - worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/121075
â HammerN'Songs
Sep 21 at 20:43
1
Without burning wood, they don't make it into a bronze age, sorry. Not going to happen.
â Karl
Sep 21 at 23:44
2
bronze age but do they actually have bronze, that is extremely unlikely on an island. You really need to define what other resources are available, "on an island" is unhelpful.
â John
Sep 23 at 2:46
1
@John It's not really about the bronze, I just wrote that to establish that they are not a modern society and do not have a super advanced technology. And as for defining other resources, I just wanted ideas. It's not like i can't add them copper and tin deposits, or a volcano if I like some of the ideas. I didn't want to restrict the question so much that's why I just said: "on an island".
â Asganius
Sep 24 at 4:14
 |Â
show 8 more comments
up vote
16
down vote
favorite
up vote
16
down vote
favorite
In my world, humans live on an island. The island is not real big, there is a volcano, a river around which is a marsh.The forest on the island is sacred for them so they cannot enter it and cannot harvest any trees.
They use mud for construction but I can't figure out what would they use as fuel
I was thinking of palm wood but there would have to be quite a lot of these I guess. And I forgot to mention that they are bronze age.
Any tips or suggestions?
natural-resources fuels
In my world, humans live on an island. The island is not real big, there is a volcano, a river around which is a marsh.The forest on the island is sacred for them so they cannot enter it and cannot harvest any trees.
They use mud for construction but I can't figure out what would they use as fuel
I was thinking of palm wood but there would have to be quite a lot of these I guess. And I forgot to mention that they are bronze age.
Any tips or suggestions?
natural-resources fuels
natural-resources fuels
edited Sep 26 at 9:06
asked Sep 21 at 17:13
Asganius
500139
500139
4
Can they use driftwood on the beach? Do they have large ungulates that leave big plops around?
â user535733
Sep 21 at 19:12
1
This seems like a hard site to make duplicates for, but someone asked something very similar a month or so ago - worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/121075
â HammerN'Songs
Sep 21 at 20:43
1
Without burning wood, they don't make it into a bronze age, sorry. Not going to happen.
â Karl
Sep 21 at 23:44
2
bronze age but do they actually have bronze, that is extremely unlikely on an island. You really need to define what other resources are available, "on an island" is unhelpful.
â John
Sep 23 at 2:46
1
@John It's not really about the bronze, I just wrote that to establish that they are not a modern society and do not have a super advanced technology. And as for defining other resources, I just wanted ideas. It's not like i can't add them copper and tin deposits, or a volcano if I like some of the ideas. I didn't want to restrict the question so much that's why I just said: "on an island".
â Asganius
Sep 24 at 4:14
 |Â
show 8 more comments
4
Can they use driftwood on the beach? Do they have large ungulates that leave big plops around?
â user535733
Sep 21 at 19:12
1
This seems like a hard site to make duplicates for, but someone asked something very similar a month or so ago - worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/121075
â HammerN'Songs
Sep 21 at 20:43
1
Without burning wood, they don't make it into a bronze age, sorry. Not going to happen.
â Karl
Sep 21 at 23:44
2
bronze age but do they actually have bronze, that is extremely unlikely on an island. You really need to define what other resources are available, "on an island" is unhelpful.
â John
Sep 23 at 2:46
1
@John It's not really about the bronze, I just wrote that to establish that they are not a modern society and do not have a super advanced technology. And as for defining other resources, I just wanted ideas. It's not like i can't add them copper and tin deposits, or a volcano if I like some of the ideas. I didn't want to restrict the question so much that's why I just said: "on an island".
â Asganius
Sep 24 at 4:14
4
4
Can they use driftwood on the beach? Do they have large ungulates that leave big plops around?
â user535733
Sep 21 at 19:12
Can they use driftwood on the beach? Do they have large ungulates that leave big plops around?
â user535733
Sep 21 at 19:12
1
1
This seems like a hard site to make duplicates for, but someone asked something very similar a month or so ago - worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/121075
â HammerN'Songs
Sep 21 at 20:43
This seems like a hard site to make duplicates for, but someone asked something very similar a month or so ago - worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/121075
â HammerN'Songs
Sep 21 at 20:43
1
1
Without burning wood, they don't make it into a bronze age, sorry. Not going to happen.
â Karl
Sep 21 at 23:44
Without burning wood, they don't make it into a bronze age, sorry. Not going to happen.
â Karl
Sep 21 at 23:44
2
2
bronze age but do they actually have bronze, that is extremely unlikely on an island. You really need to define what other resources are available, "on an island" is unhelpful.
â John
Sep 23 at 2:46
bronze age but do they actually have bronze, that is extremely unlikely on an island. You really need to define what other resources are available, "on an island" is unhelpful.
â John
Sep 23 at 2:46
1
1
@John It's not really about the bronze, I just wrote that to establish that they are not a modern society and do not have a super advanced technology. And as for defining other resources, I just wanted ideas. It's not like i can't add them copper and tin deposits, or a volcano if I like some of the ideas. I didn't want to restrict the question so much that's why I just said: "on an island".
â Asganius
Sep 24 at 4:14
@John It's not really about the bronze, I just wrote that to establish that they are not a modern society and do not have a super advanced technology. And as for defining other resources, I just wanted ideas. It's not like i can't add them copper and tin deposits, or a volcano if I like some of the ideas. I didn't want to restrict the question so much that's why I just said: "on an island".
â Asganius
Sep 24 at 4:14
 |Â
show 8 more comments
14 Answers
14
active
oldest
votes
up vote
28
down vote
Fish and whale oils
They have been commonly used by many cultures across history for many purposes. If your people live on an island, I would be inclined to think that they would have access to fish as a food source.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oil_lamp
Sources of fuel for oil lamps ... Also widely used were animal fats
(butter, fish oil, shark liver, whale blubber, seals).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whale_oil#Source_and_use
Whale oil was used as a cheap illuminant, though it gave off a strong
odor when burnt and was not very popular.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kudlik
This characteristic type of oil lamp provided warmth and light in the
harsh Arctic environment where there was no wood and where the sparse
inhabitants relied almost entirely on seal oil or on whale blubber.
2
Yes, sea animals fats were used for light, but NEVER was used for heating or even for cooking. They should have some special sea animal on the planet for that.
â Gangnus
Sep 23 at 19:46
And on all Arctic coast there is wood - thrown out by the Ocean.
â Gangnus
Sep 27 at 16:10
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Driftwood
â Gangnus
Sep 27 at 16:39
add a comment |Â
up vote
27
down vote
Fallen tree limbs, dry leaves, pine cones, twigs -- "woody debris" in general. If they aren't managing their forests, they're going to be full of debris which will just pile up and make the place susceptible to forest fire. So perhaps it's part of their cult devotion that they gather the dead material up in order to tend to the living trees.
You could take it one step further and decide that it's not the entire forest that's sacred, but only a subset of the trees: say, all of the oaks, or all of the trees over 100 years old, or something. A forest in which everything is allowed to grow without maintenance is going to be an unattractive, tangled, mess. But a well-tended, managed forest could be full of pleasant groves and charming walking paths. It takes a lot of work, though. Foresters would cut down junk trees, bushes, shrubs, and prune the good trees to help them grow healthier, yielding plenty of burnable material as waste.
On the other hand, you could just give them peat or coal or petroleum on the island.
3
"A forest in which everything is allowed to grow without maintenance is going to be an unattractive..." - On the contrary, the true ancient equatorial forest is almost clean of undergrowth. Only at the holes in the dense crown cover some shrubs and smaller trees can grow. And everything fallen becomes turf in practically no time. Here on the Earth such forests are extremely rare now. But ancient sacred forest can be true.
â Gangnus
Sep 23 at 19:53
2
@Gangnus That only works for huge equatorial forests, though. The OP has the freedom to put their island wherever they want, and as large as makes sense. I doubt you'd get an undergrowth-less forest on an island smaller than Madagascar (indeed, even the unmanaged forests on Madagascar have huge amounts of undergrowth, though I'm not sure if/when those were managed in the past). Temperate/tundra forests are also going to have tons of undergrowth. It depends on the rainfall, average temperatures, area... not every forest is the Amazon :P
â Luaan
Sep 24 at 7:25
3
@Gangnus I'm not sure that's true. The "old growth" forests that European explorers discovered in the New World and may have presumed were natural, were in fact managed for millennia by the Indians, who would regularly burn the forests for one reason or another -- to drive wildlife into the open, to clear fields, etc. The truth is we don't really know what an ancient, untended forest would look like, because humans are everywhere.
â Joe
Sep 24 at 12:57
@Luaan " That only works for huge equatorial forests" - Not only equatorial. But all real old forest with natural flora and fauna. Don't forget, that 95% of forests on the planet now are either planted or temporary ones, quickly grown instead of real forests. As for taiga, it ALL appeared instead of cold steppe, covered by moss and trees, after killing off all Pleistocene megafauna. (google at references about Pleistocene Parks )
â Gangnus
Sep 27 at 12:35
1
@Joe NA forests mostly were NOT natural already. Indians already destroyed old natural fauna. BTW, the first proven species genocide by man was in NA. (Horses, mastodons) Google Pleistocene park theme. And Equatorial forest Indians, Pygmys and Papuans did NOT destroyed their landscape.
â Gangnus
Sep 27 at 12:38
add a comment |Â
up vote
22
down vote
Do they have grasslands?
Then animal dung is used in a number of locations around the world. According to wiki, the places it has been used are: Asia, Europe, and the Americas.
add a comment |Â
up vote
16
down vote
If you're on the island of Ireland, the answer is peat. Many parts of Britain used it as fuel too. Of course this requires the landscape to be substantially peat bog rather than all forest, but if it's a large enough island then this shouldn't be a problem.
North Germany was also using it really heavily for a long long time, so it's pretty widespread, and with the right ground can be done for generations on end
â Hobbamok
Sep 24 at 9:45
@Hobbamok Thanks for the extra info. Yes, I'm sure it's in more widespread use than just the British Isles, but I know less about other places.
â Graham
Sep 24 at 12:51
add a comment |Â
up vote
13
down vote
Coal
Have them use coal. The Aztecs used it, the ancient Chinese used it, the Romans used it. They can find surface deposits or dig rudimentary bell pits. Bronze Age tech is more than enough to mine ore deposits: thatâÂÂs where they get the ores they need to make bronze in the first place.
Someone did say that about 3 hours before you did... ;-)
â Fabby
Sep 22 at 2:35
2
I feel this is the only serious answer. Oils may make lamps and natural substances could be used, but making hot, bronze smelting fires takes something like charcoal. The carbon content from the other stuff probably just wouldn't cut it for smelting.
â theREALyumdub
Sep 22 at 2:45
2
@Fabby Good catch, I missed that bit at the end. Talk about burying the lede.
â Daniel B
Sep 22 at 4:51
The problem is that open coal mining destroys forests much worse than, for example, collecting fallen branches or even partly woodcutting. Only mines!
â Gangnus
Sep 23 at 19:56
2
@theREALyumdub Most copper smelting doesn't require carbon at all; all you need is the heat (a pottery kiln is quite enough). Copper ores (especially sulfides) react readily with atmospheric oxygen. Tin is even easier - you can smelt the ore in a campfire. You need carbon for iron, which is a lot harder to smelt (you need the carbon monoxide produced by partial burning of carbon feedstock to liberate the oxygen from the iron oxide ores) and the right amount of carbon impurities produces far better iron/steel.
â Luaan
Sep 24 at 7:36
 |Â
show 2 more comments
up vote
9
down vote
Who needs fuel?
Bronze-age peoples made mirrors, so the real question is whether or not there's a bit-o'-metal on the island or even a hugely oiled and polished piece of hardwood that could be used to reflect light. Circle a pot-sized stone with such reflectors and you have a (believably) hot stone and plenty of heat to cook. It's not beyond the imagination that they would discover the value of making concave mirrors to focus the reflected light.
You also have a reasonably good defensive weapon â people will think twice after charging toward a bunch of reflectors (they have the sun god on their side!).
Could they smelt bronze with bronze mirrors, though? Sounds tricky- but even if they do figure it out, where did the bronze for the first smelter-mirror come from?
â Someone Else 37
Sep 27 at 2:03
@SomeoneElse37, Your point is well taken, but it's not part of the OP's question. My answer assumes he's willing to put the necessary metals on the island.
â JBH
Sep 27 at 2:55
The OP did mention that the islanders are in the Bronze Age. I suppose that doesn't rule out bootstrapping a solar-smelter industry using a mirror made from native gold, though, and if a polished bronze mirror can be reflective enough to smelt and alloy copper and tin, then it should be no problem for a gold mirror. Not sure if it can be made to work with wood, though- even the shiniest finishes are pretty transparent, allowing the wood itself to scatter a lot of light. Unless these islanders manage to make some kind of silver paint.
â Someone Else 37
Sep 27 at 17:34
And, of course, the OP might decide to just use bronze mirrors, and leave how the industry was bootstrapped a mystery. That could be interesting too.
â Someone Else 37
Sep 27 at 17:36
add a comment |Â
up vote
9
down vote
Natural Petroleum Seeps?
There are plenty of natural seeps of petroleum, essentially places where crude oil actually rises to the surface and forms puddles. These could be useful for fuel.
What if there are no natural seeps?
If there are no seeps, then perhaps you can have your people naturally discover underground petroleum. Many settlers in America encountered crude oil while drilling for brine.
As for the drilling part, simple cable-tool drilling doesn't require especially advanced tools, but does require a skilled operator (perhaps the art of making holes and bringing fire-sludge to the earthen world could become an art.)
What if they don't drill for oil?
In that case, there is still the possibility of coal. Coal is readily combustible, and finding it underground may involve some troubles (but nothing a little slave labor can't solve!)
What if they can't find coal?
If your people can't find coal, either, there are still a host of things they can burn. Whale oil is one; before the settlers of America discovered crude oil, whales were hunted, so that their copious amounts of blubber could be used as heating oil.
What if they can't kill a whale?
In any case, if there are other animals (terrestrial or marine alike), there is sure to be some fats on their body.
What if they're vegetarian?
There are still a host of things they can burn. These involve driftwood, grass, peat, dried kelp, and dried dung. These all burn to a satisfactory degree, although the dung source, collection, and preparation may be of questionable sanitary standards.
What if they just don't like fire?
If your natives are scared of fire, then mirrors are the solution. Bronze-age people made mirrors, but if they can't make mirrors, a simple transparent bag (jellyfish?) filled with water can act as a makeshift lens and heat things up.
Of course, a large parabolic mirror has frightening burning abilities, and if you were to ask me, I would stick with the fire.
1
I doubt a culture that can produce bronze would be scared of fire :P
â Luaan
Sep 24 at 7:37
add a comment |Â
up vote
6
down vote
Dry Dung Fuel
Essentially you take poop, dry it and then burn it later. This is a cheap and efficient fuel for homes and cooking that has been used throughout history and is still used today.
It works with both farm animal poop or human poop, so your villagers do not need to change much in order to use it, the only processing is to dry the fuel which can be done with just the sun.
There is a known issue with air quality when it is used to much but anything burned will have air quality issues. Assuming it is the bronze age it should almost be a non-factor.
2
(Also mentioned in @ShadoCat's answer)
â Qami
Sep 21 at 20:01
add a comment |Â
up vote
6
down vote
Not only dry dung, but any dry organics is OK. If people are on the island, dry seaweeds are the best. You have heaps of them on the beach, and you even needn't enter the sacred inner land to collect them.
And you can play with strange stuffs that can be contained by the weeds and can influence something ( be a medicine, slow poison, a light drug)
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
Bronze Age means long distance trade
Making bronze requires smelting ores of (at least) two metals: copper and tin. Usable copper ores are much less common than iron, but they aren't extremely rare. Tin, on the other hand, is rare. Not as rare as the precious metals, but not all that far from it. China and Southeast Asia had (and still have) the most abundant sources of tin; Europe very few; and most of the rest of the world, practically none. Furthermore, in Europe tin ores were mainly found as pegmatitic "hard rock mining" -- especially granite, one of the hardest stones. (Asia had another advantage here: the deposits in Southeast Asia are alluvial. That is, the tin ores have been released from hard rock by erosion, and ended up in riverbeds, concentrated by their high density.)
That meant that the Bronze Age coincided with the development of long distance trading networks and the large scale stable empires that could support them; and that tin mining coincided with the development of serious masonry engineering.
So, does your island contain tin deposits?
No, this island does not mine tin. Fuel is only one of their problems. Being on an island, they will especially want timber for boats. With a need to import expensive tin, a shortage of boats, as well as fuel restrictions, you will need some way to explain how this culture could survive as a Bronze Age civilisation. It's not impossible, but they will probably need some other valuable export to explain how they fit in the trading network. Without naval power to protect it, you will also need to explain why others can't just take control of this resource.
No, this island does not mine tin, and it also isn't an economic power. Sorry, with all its disadvantages, I don't believe it is likely for your island to achieve Bronze Age technology.
Yes, it has significant tin deposits. You don't really need to worry about fuel; your island is the industrial heartland of a wealthy empire. Their trading network can supply them with fuel, food, and any other commodities they require. They also are probably building with granite masonry, not mud. However if the tin reserves are depleted, they will quickly collapse. Retaining control over this valuable resource will probably require serious military strength.
Wait, what about the fuel?
OK, I rabbited on about other issues without answering your actual question -- although others have answered it pretty well. Different cultures at different times have used a range of fuels for cooking and industry, and any of them might suit. Coal is probably the best, but it really isn't that big an issue. The one thing for which wood is absolutely irreplaceable for a Bronze Age civilisation is not fuel, but boats. Sure, you can make kayaks and coracles from animal skin, but you aren't going to haul tons of tin from Cornwall to Cyprus in a coracle.
With no timber, the only fishing will be casting nets from the shore, which for an island people means a serious reduction in resources, especially protein supply. There will be no trade, no cultural exchange. There will be no navy.
You also need to consider the impact of no land clearing. Sure, excessive land clearing will damage their environment; but having none at all will make it hard to grow crops, or pasture for livestock. Minimal fishing, no livestock, no trade, subsistence cropping between trees; your islanders will be desperately poor, and a few bad years could exterminate them.
Actually, it's thought that bronze was originally made with copper and arsenic, rather than tin. Arsenic is a rather common impurity in copper ores. The first bronze-makers pretty much had "bronze ore" to work with. Even the much later discovery (about 2000 years later, as far as we can tell) of copper+tin = bronze seems to have been the same way - tin impurities in copper ore. However, people somehow very quickly learned to mine tin separately and add it to copper to make bronze - and that's where trade networks necessarily come in.
â Luaan
Sep 24 at 7:41
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
Lava
Maybe there is volcano on the islan and there is hot lava inside - then you have as much heat, as you need.
If there is small, but stable lava stream going to sea (as infinite sink - at least for few decades, but even milenia, long enough to grow some technology around), the better - you can cook in the watter near it, use boulders to place there and then move elsewhere to provide temporary heat source, you can even make small side streams by blocking the main one, (until it overflows the sides at weekened points and then again stop, as the blocking boulder are melt and washed away) which can double for metal melting with some preparation, having sized peaces of metal, you can heat them over lava and then hammered (blacksmiths) to any form needed.
Also having lava drips somewhere could make for stone rods, which (after some manufacturing - stone-age techniques) may be of different use - from harpoon spikes, to maybe axis for wheels ...
Even some simple (stationary) steam engines can be build and filled with watter regularry to do some work - or just cooking, desinfection ...
Maybe there would be even some sources of sulphur (for basic alchemy) and watter plants, which are not sancted, so after drying could be used as fuel source as well as source of "wooden coal", so even black powder is not out of reach ...
Pushing wet trees of water plants to the lava and fast removing them can even provides some stone pipes (with burned watter plant inside, but with good training and practice it could be possible make some - then improve it by using these watter plants and sand to make them somehow regular for various use :)
Molten rock gives off quite a bit of radiative heat. I doubt you'd be able to get close enough to a surface lava flow to cook anything. Dwarf Fortress isn't the most realistic depiction of the world :P Subterranean flows heating the rock above isn't without trouble either - you'd need some sort of isolation to make sure you can reach the cooking spot safely - but it might be doable.
â Luaan
Sep 24 at 7:46
Peoples on volcanic islands, such as the Polynesians, tended to favor wooden sources of heat because lava is very to difficult to contain and use properly and consistently, so saying that that could function as the basis for all their infrastructure is a bit of a stretch.
â Bewilderer
Sep 24 at 14:47
Well, I agree, but the OP stated clearly, that wood is sacred and out of limits. So I recomend lava as heat source, as it allows at least somehow get heat (even when hard to manage and a lot of preparations needs to be done to approch lava safely) as other sources (like coal, grass ... ) was mentioned in other answers. It is no way perfect, but sometimes may be better than nothing.
â gilhad
Sep 24 at 16:11
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
In addition to animal oils, fossil fuels are always an option. Easily tappable crude oil, coal deposits, etc.
This does not provide an answer to the question. To critique or request clarification from an author, leave a comment below their post. - From Review
â L.Dutchâ¦
Sep 22 at 14:26
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
What they need is energy/fuel for fire. So they can:
1. Bake/cook/roast food
2. Have light in the night
3. Have a source of heat (for cold nights?)
4. Work on metal/forging
That can be replaced with:
1. Mirrored and centred light for heating a pot.
2. Have oil lights or have light bug pets in a cage
3. Use better clothing in the night
4. Hard... more mirrors?, but since the form is changing its had to focus the light on the metal, at this point coal isn't bad
In the ends they could also harvest organic material an collect and compress the decay gases, to make a gas grill
;)
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
Geothermal energy ?
The romans used to heat their houses with hypocausts :
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypocaust
Using extremely hot water from hot springs could be used instead of fire.
Then you could use alternative ressources for other uses, but you can save a lot on heating fuel ressources.
1
Hypocaust was not geothermal energy. Somebody had to lit a fire to heat up the floor.
â L.Dutchâ¦
Sep 26 at 11:40
I know, but you could probably make the same system using a hot spring.
â Aël
Sep 26 at 15:44
add a comment |Â
14 Answers
14
active
oldest
votes
14 Answers
14
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
28
down vote
Fish and whale oils
They have been commonly used by many cultures across history for many purposes. If your people live on an island, I would be inclined to think that they would have access to fish as a food source.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oil_lamp
Sources of fuel for oil lamps ... Also widely used were animal fats
(butter, fish oil, shark liver, whale blubber, seals).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whale_oil#Source_and_use
Whale oil was used as a cheap illuminant, though it gave off a strong
odor when burnt and was not very popular.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kudlik
This characteristic type of oil lamp provided warmth and light in the
harsh Arctic environment where there was no wood and where the sparse
inhabitants relied almost entirely on seal oil or on whale blubber.
2
Yes, sea animals fats were used for light, but NEVER was used for heating or even for cooking. They should have some special sea animal on the planet for that.
â Gangnus
Sep 23 at 19:46
And on all Arctic coast there is wood - thrown out by the Ocean.
â Gangnus
Sep 27 at 16:10
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Driftwood
â Gangnus
Sep 27 at 16:39
add a comment |Â
up vote
28
down vote
Fish and whale oils
They have been commonly used by many cultures across history for many purposes. If your people live on an island, I would be inclined to think that they would have access to fish as a food source.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oil_lamp
Sources of fuel for oil lamps ... Also widely used were animal fats
(butter, fish oil, shark liver, whale blubber, seals).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whale_oil#Source_and_use
Whale oil was used as a cheap illuminant, though it gave off a strong
odor when burnt and was not very popular.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kudlik
This characteristic type of oil lamp provided warmth and light in the
harsh Arctic environment where there was no wood and where the sparse
inhabitants relied almost entirely on seal oil or on whale blubber.
2
Yes, sea animals fats were used for light, but NEVER was used for heating or even for cooking. They should have some special sea animal on the planet for that.
â Gangnus
Sep 23 at 19:46
And on all Arctic coast there is wood - thrown out by the Ocean.
â Gangnus
Sep 27 at 16:10
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Driftwood
â Gangnus
Sep 27 at 16:39
add a comment |Â
up vote
28
down vote
up vote
28
down vote
Fish and whale oils
They have been commonly used by many cultures across history for many purposes. If your people live on an island, I would be inclined to think that they would have access to fish as a food source.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oil_lamp
Sources of fuel for oil lamps ... Also widely used were animal fats
(butter, fish oil, shark liver, whale blubber, seals).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whale_oil#Source_and_use
Whale oil was used as a cheap illuminant, though it gave off a strong
odor when burnt and was not very popular.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kudlik
This characteristic type of oil lamp provided warmth and light in the
harsh Arctic environment where there was no wood and where the sparse
inhabitants relied almost entirely on seal oil or on whale blubber.
Fish and whale oils
They have been commonly used by many cultures across history for many purposes. If your people live on an island, I would be inclined to think that they would have access to fish as a food source.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oil_lamp
Sources of fuel for oil lamps ... Also widely used were animal fats
(butter, fish oil, shark liver, whale blubber, seals).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whale_oil#Source_and_use
Whale oil was used as a cheap illuminant, though it gave off a strong
odor when burnt and was not very popular.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kudlik
This characteristic type of oil lamp provided warmth and light in the
harsh Arctic environment where there was no wood and where the sparse
inhabitants relied almost entirely on seal oil or on whale blubber.
edited Sep 21 at 17:23
answered Sep 21 at 17:17
Qami
2,087417
2,087417
2
Yes, sea animals fats were used for light, but NEVER was used for heating or even for cooking. They should have some special sea animal on the planet for that.
â Gangnus
Sep 23 at 19:46
And on all Arctic coast there is wood - thrown out by the Ocean.
â Gangnus
Sep 27 at 16:10
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Driftwood
â Gangnus
Sep 27 at 16:39
add a comment |Â
2
Yes, sea animals fats were used for light, but NEVER was used for heating or even for cooking. They should have some special sea animal on the planet for that.
â Gangnus
Sep 23 at 19:46
And on all Arctic coast there is wood - thrown out by the Ocean.
â Gangnus
Sep 27 at 16:10
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Driftwood
â Gangnus
Sep 27 at 16:39
2
2
Yes, sea animals fats were used for light, but NEVER was used for heating or even for cooking. They should have some special sea animal on the planet for that.
â Gangnus
Sep 23 at 19:46
Yes, sea animals fats were used for light, but NEVER was used for heating or even for cooking. They should have some special sea animal on the planet for that.
â Gangnus
Sep 23 at 19:46
And on all Arctic coast there is wood - thrown out by the Ocean.
â Gangnus
Sep 27 at 16:10
And on all Arctic coast there is wood - thrown out by the Ocean.
â Gangnus
Sep 27 at 16:10
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Driftwood
â Gangnus
Sep 27 at 16:39
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Driftwood
â Gangnus
Sep 27 at 16:39
add a comment |Â
up vote
27
down vote
Fallen tree limbs, dry leaves, pine cones, twigs -- "woody debris" in general. If they aren't managing their forests, they're going to be full of debris which will just pile up and make the place susceptible to forest fire. So perhaps it's part of their cult devotion that they gather the dead material up in order to tend to the living trees.
You could take it one step further and decide that it's not the entire forest that's sacred, but only a subset of the trees: say, all of the oaks, or all of the trees over 100 years old, or something. A forest in which everything is allowed to grow without maintenance is going to be an unattractive, tangled, mess. But a well-tended, managed forest could be full of pleasant groves and charming walking paths. It takes a lot of work, though. Foresters would cut down junk trees, bushes, shrubs, and prune the good trees to help them grow healthier, yielding plenty of burnable material as waste.
On the other hand, you could just give them peat or coal or petroleum on the island.
3
"A forest in which everything is allowed to grow without maintenance is going to be an unattractive..." - On the contrary, the true ancient equatorial forest is almost clean of undergrowth. Only at the holes in the dense crown cover some shrubs and smaller trees can grow. And everything fallen becomes turf in practically no time. Here on the Earth such forests are extremely rare now. But ancient sacred forest can be true.
â Gangnus
Sep 23 at 19:53
2
@Gangnus That only works for huge equatorial forests, though. The OP has the freedom to put their island wherever they want, and as large as makes sense. I doubt you'd get an undergrowth-less forest on an island smaller than Madagascar (indeed, even the unmanaged forests on Madagascar have huge amounts of undergrowth, though I'm not sure if/when those were managed in the past). Temperate/tundra forests are also going to have tons of undergrowth. It depends on the rainfall, average temperatures, area... not every forest is the Amazon :P
â Luaan
Sep 24 at 7:25
3
@Gangnus I'm not sure that's true. The "old growth" forests that European explorers discovered in the New World and may have presumed were natural, were in fact managed for millennia by the Indians, who would regularly burn the forests for one reason or another -- to drive wildlife into the open, to clear fields, etc. The truth is we don't really know what an ancient, untended forest would look like, because humans are everywhere.
â Joe
Sep 24 at 12:57
@Luaan " That only works for huge equatorial forests" - Not only equatorial. But all real old forest with natural flora and fauna. Don't forget, that 95% of forests on the planet now are either planted or temporary ones, quickly grown instead of real forests. As for taiga, it ALL appeared instead of cold steppe, covered by moss and trees, after killing off all Pleistocene megafauna. (google at references about Pleistocene Parks )
â Gangnus
Sep 27 at 12:35
1
@Joe NA forests mostly were NOT natural already. Indians already destroyed old natural fauna. BTW, the first proven species genocide by man was in NA. (Horses, mastodons) Google Pleistocene park theme. And Equatorial forest Indians, Pygmys and Papuans did NOT destroyed their landscape.
â Gangnus
Sep 27 at 12:38
add a comment |Â
up vote
27
down vote
Fallen tree limbs, dry leaves, pine cones, twigs -- "woody debris" in general. If they aren't managing their forests, they're going to be full of debris which will just pile up and make the place susceptible to forest fire. So perhaps it's part of their cult devotion that they gather the dead material up in order to tend to the living trees.
You could take it one step further and decide that it's not the entire forest that's sacred, but only a subset of the trees: say, all of the oaks, or all of the trees over 100 years old, or something. A forest in which everything is allowed to grow without maintenance is going to be an unattractive, tangled, mess. But a well-tended, managed forest could be full of pleasant groves and charming walking paths. It takes a lot of work, though. Foresters would cut down junk trees, bushes, shrubs, and prune the good trees to help them grow healthier, yielding plenty of burnable material as waste.
On the other hand, you could just give them peat or coal or petroleum on the island.
3
"A forest in which everything is allowed to grow without maintenance is going to be an unattractive..." - On the contrary, the true ancient equatorial forest is almost clean of undergrowth. Only at the holes in the dense crown cover some shrubs and smaller trees can grow. And everything fallen becomes turf in practically no time. Here on the Earth such forests are extremely rare now. But ancient sacred forest can be true.
â Gangnus
Sep 23 at 19:53
2
@Gangnus That only works for huge equatorial forests, though. The OP has the freedom to put their island wherever they want, and as large as makes sense. I doubt you'd get an undergrowth-less forest on an island smaller than Madagascar (indeed, even the unmanaged forests on Madagascar have huge amounts of undergrowth, though I'm not sure if/when those were managed in the past). Temperate/tundra forests are also going to have tons of undergrowth. It depends on the rainfall, average temperatures, area... not every forest is the Amazon :P
â Luaan
Sep 24 at 7:25
3
@Gangnus I'm not sure that's true. The "old growth" forests that European explorers discovered in the New World and may have presumed were natural, were in fact managed for millennia by the Indians, who would regularly burn the forests for one reason or another -- to drive wildlife into the open, to clear fields, etc. The truth is we don't really know what an ancient, untended forest would look like, because humans are everywhere.
â Joe
Sep 24 at 12:57
@Luaan " That only works for huge equatorial forests" - Not only equatorial. But all real old forest with natural flora and fauna. Don't forget, that 95% of forests on the planet now are either planted or temporary ones, quickly grown instead of real forests. As for taiga, it ALL appeared instead of cold steppe, covered by moss and trees, after killing off all Pleistocene megafauna. (google at references about Pleistocene Parks )
â Gangnus
Sep 27 at 12:35
1
@Joe NA forests mostly were NOT natural already. Indians already destroyed old natural fauna. BTW, the first proven species genocide by man was in NA. (Horses, mastodons) Google Pleistocene park theme. And Equatorial forest Indians, Pygmys and Papuans did NOT destroyed their landscape.
â Gangnus
Sep 27 at 12:38
add a comment |Â
up vote
27
down vote
up vote
27
down vote
Fallen tree limbs, dry leaves, pine cones, twigs -- "woody debris" in general. If they aren't managing their forests, they're going to be full of debris which will just pile up and make the place susceptible to forest fire. So perhaps it's part of their cult devotion that they gather the dead material up in order to tend to the living trees.
You could take it one step further and decide that it's not the entire forest that's sacred, but only a subset of the trees: say, all of the oaks, or all of the trees over 100 years old, or something. A forest in which everything is allowed to grow without maintenance is going to be an unattractive, tangled, mess. But a well-tended, managed forest could be full of pleasant groves and charming walking paths. It takes a lot of work, though. Foresters would cut down junk trees, bushes, shrubs, and prune the good trees to help them grow healthier, yielding plenty of burnable material as waste.
On the other hand, you could just give them peat or coal or petroleum on the island.
Fallen tree limbs, dry leaves, pine cones, twigs -- "woody debris" in general. If they aren't managing their forests, they're going to be full of debris which will just pile up and make the place susceptible to forest fire. So perhaps it's part of their cult devotion that they gather the dead material up in order to tend to the living trees.
You could take it one step further and decide that it's not the entire forest that's sacred, but only a subset of the trees: say, all of the oaks, or all of the trees over 100 years old, or something. A forest in which everything is allowed to grow without maintenance is going to be an unattractive, tangled, mess. But a well-tended, managed forest could be full of pleasant groves and charming walking paths. It takes a lot of work, though. Foresters would cut down junk trees, bushes, shrubs, and prune the good trees to help them grow healthier, yielding plenty of burnable material as waste.
On the other hand, you could just give them peat or coal or petroleum on the island.
answered Sep 21 at 18:46
Joe
3,1931821
3,1931821
3
"A forest in which everything is allowed to grow without maintenance is going to be an unattractive..." - On the contrary, the true ancient equatorial forest is almost clean of undergrowth. Only at the holes in the dense crown cover some shrubs and smaller trees can grow. And everything fallen becomes turf in practically no time. Here on the Earth such forests are extremely rare now. But ancient sacred forest can be true.
â Gangnus
Sep 23 at 19:53
2
@Gangnus That only works for huge equatorial forests, though. The OP has the freedom to put their island wherever they want, and as large as makes sense. I doubt you'd get an undergrowth-less forest on an island smaller than Madagascar (indeed, even the unmanaged forests on Madagascar have huge amounts of undergrowth, though I'm not sure if/when those were managed in the past). Temperate/tundra forests are also going to have tons of undergrowth. It depends on the rainfall, average temperatures, area... not every forest is the Amazon :P
â Luaan
Sep 24 at 7:25
3
@Gangnus I'm not sure that's true. The "old growth" forests that European explorers discovered in the New World and may have presumed were natural, were in fact managed for millennia by the Indians, who would regularly burn the forests for one reason or another -- to drive wildlife into the open, to clear fields, etc. The truth is we don't really know what an ancient, untended forest would look like, because humans are everywhere.
â Joe
Sep 24 at 12:57
@Luaan " That only works for huge equatorial forests" - Not only equatorial. But all real old forest with natural flora and fauna. Don't forget, that 95% of forests on the planet now are either planted or temporary ones, quickly grown instead of real forests. As for taiga, it ALL appeared instead of cold steppe, covered by moss and trees, after killing off all Pleistocene megafauna. (google at references about Pleistocene Parks )
â Gangnus
Sep 27 at 12:35
1
@Joe NA forests mostly were NOT natural already. Indians already destroyed old natural fauna. BTW, the first proven species genocide by man was in NA. (Horses, mastodons) Google Pleistocene park theme. And Equatorial forest Indians, Pygmys and Papuans did NOT destroyed their landscape.
â Gangnus
Sep 27 at 12:38
add a comment |Â
3
"A forest in which everything is allowed to grow without maintenance is going to be an unattractive..." - On the contrary, the true ancient equatorial forest is almost clean of undergrowth. Only at the holes in the dense crown cover some shrubs and smaller trees can grow. And everything fallen becomes turf in practically no time. Here on the Earth such forests are extremely rare now. But ancient sacred forest can be true.
â Gangnus
Sep 23 at 19:53
2
@Gangnus That only works for huge equatorial forests, though. The OP has the freedom to put their island wherever they want, and as large as makes sense. I doubt you'd get an undergrowth-less forest on an island smaller than Madagascar (indeed, even the unmanaged forests on Madagascar have huge amounts of undergrowth, though I'm not sure if/when those were managed in the past). Temperate/tundra forests are also going to have tons of undergrowth. It depends on the rainfall, average temperatures, area... not every forest is the Amazon :P
â Luaan
Sep 24 at 7:25
3
@Gangnus I'm not sure that's true. The "old growth" forests that European explorers discovered in the New World and may have presumed were natural, were in fact managed for millennia by the Indians, who would regularly burn the forests for one reason or another -- to drive wildlife into the open, to clear fields, etc. The truth is we don't really know what an ancient, untended forest would look like, because humans are everywhere.
â Joe
Sep 24 at 12:57
@Luaan " That only works for huge equatorial forests" - Not only equatorial. But all real old forest with natural flora and fauna. Don't forget, that 95% of forests on the planet now are either planted or temporary ones, quickly grown instead of real forests. As for taiga, it ALL appeared instead of cold steppe, covered by moss and trees, after killing off all Pleistocene megafauna. (google at references about Pleistocene Parks )
â Gangnus
Sep 27 at 12:35
1
@Joe NA forests mostly were NOT natural already. Indians already destroyed old natural fauna. BTW, the first proven species genocide by man was in NA. (Horses, mastodons) Google Pleistocene park theme. And Equatorial forest Indians, Pygmys and Papuans did NOT destroyed their landscape.
â Gangnus
Sep 27 at 12:38
3
3
"A forest in which everything is allowed to grow without maintenance is going to be an unattractive..." - On the contrary, the true ancient equatorial forest is almost clean of undergrowth. Only at the holes in the dense crown cover some shrubs and smaller trees can grow. And everything fallen becomes turf in practically no time. Here on the Earth such forests are extremely rare now. But ancient sacred forest can be true.
â Gangnus
Sep 23 at 19:53
"A forest in which everything is allowed to grow without maintenance is going to be an unattractive..." - On the contrary, the true ancient equatorial forest is almost clean of undergrowth. Only at the holes in the dense crown cover some shrubs and smaller trees can grow. And everything fallen becomes turf in practically no time. Here on the Earth such forests are extremely rare now. But ancient sacred forest can be true.
â Gangnus
Sep 23 at 19:53
2
2
@Gangnus That only works for huge equatorial forests, though. The OP has the freedom to put their island wherever they want, and as large as makes sense. I doubt you'd get an undergrowth-less forest on an island smaller than Madagascar (indeed, even the unmanaged forests on Madagascar have huge amounts of undergrowth, though I'm not sure if/when those were managed in the past). Temperate/tundra forests are also going to have tons of undergrowth. It depends on the rainfall, average temperatures, area... not every forest is the Amazon :P
â Luaan
Sep 24 at 7:25
@Gangnus That only works for huge equatorial forests, though. The OP has the freedom to put their island wherever they want, and as large as makes sense. I doubt you'd get an undergrowth-less forest on an island smaller than Madagascar (indeed, even the unmanaged forests on Madagascar have huge amounts of undergrowth, though I'm not sure if/when those were managed in the past). Temperate/tundra forests are also going to have tons of undergrowth. It depends on the rainfall, average temperatures, area... not every forest is the Amazon :P
â Luaan
Sep 24 at 7:25
3
3
@Gangnus I'm not sure that's true. The "old growth" forests that European explorers discovered in the New World and may have presumed were natural, were in fact managed for millennia by the Indians, who would regularly burn the forests for one reason or another -- to drive wildlife into the open, to clear fields, etc. The truth is we don't really know what an ancient, untended forest would look like, because humans are everywhere.
â Joe
Sep 24 at 12:57
@Gangnus I'm not sure that's true. The "old growth" forests that European explorers discovered in the New World and may have presumed were natural, were in fact managed for millennia by the Indians, who would regularly burn the forests for one reason or another -- to drive wildlife into the open, to clear fields, etc. The truth is we don't really know what an ancient, untended forest would look like, because humans are everywhere.
â Joe
Sep 24 at 12:57
@Luaan " That only works for huge equatorial forests" - Not only equatorial. But all real old forest with natural flora and fauna. Don't forget, that 95% of forests on the planet now are either planted or temporary ones, quickly grown instead of real forests. As for taiga, it ALL appeared instead of cold steppe, covered by moss and trees, after killing off all Pleistocene megafauna. (google at references about Pleistocene Parks )
â Gangnus
Sep 27 at 12:35
@Luaan " That only works for huge equatorial forests" - Not only equatorial. But all real old forest with natural flora and fauna. Don't forget, that 95% of forests on the planet now are either planted or temporary ones, quickly grown instead of real forests. As for taiga, it ALL appeared instead of cold steppe, covered by moss and trees, after killing off all Pleistocene megafauna. (google at references about Pleistocene Parks )
â Gangnus
Sep 27 at 12:35
1
1
@Joe NA forests mostly were NOT natural already. Indians already destroyed old natural fauna. BTW, the first proven species genocide by man was in NA. (Horses, mastodons) Google Pleistocene park theme. And Equatorial forest Indians, Pygmys and Papuans did NOT destroyed their landscape.
â Gangnus
Sep 27 at 12:38
@Joe NA forests mostly were NOT natural already. Indians already destroyed old natural fauna. BTW, the first proven species genocide by man was in NA. (Horses, mastodons) Google Pleistocene park theme. And Equatorial forest Indians, Pygmys and Papuans did NOT destroyed their landscape.
â Gangnus
Sep 27 at 12:38
add a comment |Â
up vote
22
down vote
Do they have grasslands?
Then animal dung is used in a number of locations around the world. According to wiki, the places it has been used are: Asia, Europe, and the Americas.
add a comment |Â
up vote
22
down vote
Do they have grasslands?
Then animal dung is used in a number of locations around the world. According to wiki, the places it has been used are: Asia, Europe, and the Americas.
add a comment |Â
up vote
22
down vote
up vote
22
down vote
Do they have grasslands?
Then animal dung is used in a number of locations around the world. According to wiki, the places it has been used are: Asia, Europe, and the Americas.
Do they have grasslands?
Then animal dung is used in a number of locations around the world. According to wiki, the places it has been used are: Asia, Europe, and the Americas.
answered Sep 21 at 17:23
ShadoCat
13.9k1849
13.9k1849
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
16
down vote
If you're on the island of Ireland, the answer is peat. Many parts of Britain used it as fuel too. Of course this requires the landscape to be substantially peat bog rather than all forest, but if it's a large enough island then this shouldn't be a problem.
North Germany was also using it really heavily for a long long time, so it's pretty widespread, and with the right ground can be done for generations on end
â Hobbamok
Sep 24 at 9:45
@Hobbamok Thanks for the extra info. Yes, I'm sure it's in more widespread use than just the British Isles, but I know less about other places.
â Graham
Sep 24 at 12:51
add a comment |Â
up vote
16
down vote
If you're on the island of Ireland, the answer is peat. Many parts of Britain used it as fuel too. Of course this requires the landscape to be substantially peat bog rather than all forest, but if it's a large enough island then this shouldn't be a problem.
North Germany was also using it really heavily for a long long time, so it's pretty widespread, and with the right ground can be done for generations on end
â Hobbamok
Sep 24 at 9:45
@Hobbamok Thanks for the extra info. Yes, I'm sure it's in more widespread use than just the British Isles, but I know less about other places.
â Graham
Sep 24 at 12:51
add a comment |Â
up vote
16
down vote
up vote
16
down vote
If you're on the island of Ireland, the answer is peat. Many parts of Britain used it as fuel too. Of course this requires the landscape to be substantially peat bog rather than all forest, but if it's a large enough island then this shouldn't be a problem.
If you're on the island of Ireland, the answer is peat. Many parts of Britain used it as fuel too. Of course this requires the landscape to be substantially peat bog rather than all forest, but if it's a large enough island then this shouldn't be a problem.
answered Sep 21 at 22:12
Graham
9,8961251
9,8961251
North Germany was also using it really heavily for a long long time, so it's pretty widespread, and with the right ground can be done for generations on end
â Hobbamok
Sep 24 at 9:45
@Hobbamok Thanks for the extra info. Yes, I'm sure it's in more widespread use than just the British Isles, but I know less about other places.
â Graham
Sep 24 at 12:51
add a comment |Â
North Germany was also using it really heavily for a long long time, so it's pretty widespread, and with the right ground can be done for generations on end
â Hobbamok
Sep 24 at 9:45
@Hobbamok Thanks for the extra info. Yes, I'm sure it's in more widespread use than just the British Isles, but I know less about other places.
â Graham
Sep 24 at 12:51
North Germany was also using it really heavily for a long long time, so it's pretty widespread, and with the right ground can be done for generations on end
â Hobbamok
Sep 24 at 9:45
North Germany was also using it really heavily for a long long time, so it's pretty widespread, and with the right ground can be done for generations on end
â Hobbamok
Sep 24 at 9:45
@Hobbamok Thanks for the extra info. Yes, I'm sure it's in more widespread use than just the British Isles, but I know less about other places.
â Graham
Sep 24 at 12:51
@Hobbamok Thanks for the extra info. Yes, I'm sure it's in more widespread use than just the British Isles, but I know less about other places.
â Graham
Sep 24 at 12:51
add a comment |Â
up vote
13
down vote
Coal
Have them use coal. The Aztecs used it, the ancient Chinese used it, the Romans used it. They can find surface deposits or dig rudimentary bell pits. Bronze Age tech is more than enough to mine ore deposits: thatâÂÂs where they get the ores they need to make bronze in the first place.
Someone did say that about 3 hours before you did... ;-)
â Fabby
Sep 22 at 2:35
2
I feel this is the only serious answer. Oils may make lamps and natural substances could be used, but making hot, bronze smelting fires takes something like charcoal. The carbon content from the other stuff probably just wouldn't cut it for smelting.
â theREALyumdub
Sep 22 at 2:45
2
@Fabby Good catch, I missed that bit at the end. Talk about burying the lede.
â Daniel B
Sep 22 at 4:51
The problem is that open coal mining destroys forests much worse than, for example, collecting fallen branches or even partly woodcutting. Only mines!
â Gangnus
Sep 23 at 19:56
2
@theREALyumdub Most copper smelting doesn't require carbon at all; all you need is the heat (a pottery kiln is quite enough). Copper ores (especially sulfides) react readily with atmospheric oxygen. Tin is even easier - you can smelt the ore in a campfire. You need carbon for iron, which is a lot harder to smelt (you need the carbon monoxide produced by partial burning of carbon feedstock to liberate the oxygen from the iron oxide ores) and the right amount of carbon impurities produces far better iron/steel.
â Luaan
Sep 24 at 7:36
 |Â
show 2 more comments
up vote
13
down vote
Coal
Have them use coal. The Aztecs used it, the ancient Chinese used it, the Romans used it. They can find surface deposits or dig rudimentary bell pits. Bronze Age tech is more than enough to mine ore deposits: thatâÂÂs where they get the ores they need to make bronze in the first place.
Someone did say that about 3 hours before you did... ;-)
â Fabby
Sep 22 at 2:35
2
I feel this is the only serious answer. Oils may make lamps and natural substances could be used, but making hot, bronze smelting fires takes something like charcoal. The carbon content from the other stuff probably just wouldn't cut it for smelting.
â theREALyumdub
Sep 22 at 2:45
2
@Fabby Good catch, I missed that bit at the end. Talk about burying the lede.
â Daniel B
Sep 22 at 4:51
The problem is that open coal mining destroys forests much worse than, for example, collecting fallen branches or even partly woodcutting. Only mines!
â Gangnus
Sep 23 at 19:56
2
@theREALyumdub Most copper smelting doesn't require carbon at all; all you need is the heat (a pottery kiln is quite enough). Copper ores (especially sulfides) react readily with atmospheric oxygen. Tin is even easier - you can smelt the ore in a campfire. You need carbon for iron, which is a lot harder to smelt (you need the carbon monoxide produced by partial burning of carbon feedstock to liberate the oxygen from the iron oxide ores) and the right amount of carbon impurities produces far better iron/steel.
â Luaan
Sep 24 at 7:36
 |Â
show 2 more comments
up vote
13
down vote
up vote
13
down vote
Coal
Have them use coal. The Aztecs used it, the ancient Chinese used it, the Romans used it. They can find surface deposits or dig rudimentary bell pits. Bronze Age tech is more than enough to mine ore deposits: thatâÂÂs where they get the ores they need to make bronze in the first place.
Coal
Have them use coal. The Aztecs used it, the ancient Chinese used it, the Romans used it. They can find surface deposits or dig rudimentary bell pits. Bronze Age tech is more than enough to mine ore deposits: thatâÂÂs where they get the ores they need to make bronze in the first place.
edited Sep 23 at 2:19
answered Sep 21 at 21:55
Daniel B
3,2291518
3,2291518
Someone did say that about 3 hours before you did... ;-)
â Fabby
Sep 22 at 2:35
2
I feel this is the only serious answer. Oils may make lamps and natural substances could be used, but making hot, bronze smelting fires takes something like charcoal. The carbon content from the other stuff probably just wouldn't cut it for smelting.
â theREALyumdub
Sep 22 at 2:45
2
@Fabby Good catch, I missed that bit at the end. Talk about burying the lede.
â Daniel B
Sep 22 at 4:51
The problem is that open coal mining destroys forests much worse than, for example, collecting fallen branches or even partly woodcutting. Only mines!
â Gangnus
Sep 23 at 19:56
2
@theREALyumdub Most copper smelting doesn't require carbon at all; all you need is the heat (a pottery kiln is quite enough). Copper ores (especially sulfides) react readily with atmospheric oxygen. Tin is even easier - you can smelt the ore in a campfire. You need carbon for iron, which is a lot harder to smelt (you need the carbon monoxide produced by partial burning of carbon feedstock to liberate the oxygen from the iron oxide ores) and the right amount of carbon impurities produces far better iron/steel.
â Luaan
Sep 24 at 7:36
 |Â
show 2 more comments
Someone did say that about 3 hours before you did... ;-)
â Fabby
Sep 22 at 2:35
2
I feel this is the only serious answer. Oils may make lamps and natural substances could be used, but making hot, bronze smelting fires takes something like charcoal. The carbon content from the other stuff probably just wouldn't cut it for smelting.
â theREALyumdub
Sep 22 at 2:45
2
@Fabby Good catch, I missed that bit at the end. Talk about burying the lede.
â Daniel B
Sep 22 at 4:51
The problem is that open coal mining destroys forests much worse than, for example, collecting fallen branches or even partly woodcutting. Only mines!
â Gangnus
Sep 23 at 19:56
2
@theREALyumdub Most copper smelting doesn't require carbon at all; all you need is the heat (a pottery kiln is quite enough). Copper ores (especially sulfides) react readily with atmospheric oxygen. Tin is even easier - you can smelt the ore in a campfire. You need carbon for iron, which is a lot harder to smelt (you need the carbon monoxide produced by partial burning of carbon feedstock to liberate the oxygen from the iron oxide ores) and the right amount of carbon impurities produces far better iron/steel.
â Luaan
Sep 24 at 7:36
Someone did say that about 3 hours before you did... ;-)
â Fabby
Sep 22 at 2:35
Someone did say that about 3 hours before you did... ;-)
â Fabby
Sep 22 at 2:35
2
2
I feel this is the only serious answer. Oils may make lamps and natural substances could be used, but making hot, bronze smelting fires takes something like charcoal. The carbon content from the other stuff probably just wouldn't cut it for smelting.
â theREALyumdub
Sep 22 at 2:45
I feel this is the only serious answer. Oils may make lamps and natural substances could be used, but making hot, bronze smelting fires takes something like charcoal. The carbon content from the other stuff probably just wouldn't cut it for smelting.
â theREALyumdub
Sep 22 at 2:45
2
2
@Fabby Good catch, I missed that bit at the end. Talk about burying the lede.
â Daniel B
Sep 22 at 4:51
@Fabby Good catch, I missed that bit at the end. Talk about burying the lede.
â Daniel B
Sep 22 at 4:51
The problem is that open coal mining destroys forests much worse than, for example, collecting fallen branches or even partly woodcutting. Only mines!
â Gangnus
Sep 23 at 19:56
The problem is that open coal mining destroys forests much worse than, for example, collecting fallen branches or even partly woodcutting. Only mines!
â Gangnus
Sep 23 at 19:56
2
2
@theREALyumdub Most copper smelting doesn't require carbon at all; all you need is the heat (a pottery kiln is quite enough). Copper ores (especially sulfides) react readily with atmospheric oxygen. Tin is even easier - you can smelt the ore in a campfire. You need carbon for iron, which is a lot harder to smelt (you need the carbon monoxide produced by partial burning of carbon feedstock to liberate the oxygen from the iron oxide ores) and the right amount of carbon impurities produces far better iron/steel.
â Luaan
Sep 24 at 7:36
@theREALyumdub Most copper smelting doesn't require carbon at all; all you need is the heat (a pottery kiln is quite enough). Copper ores (especially sulfides) react readily with atmospheric oxygen. Tin is even easier - you can smelt the ore in a campfire. You need carbon for iron, which is a lot harder to smelt (you need the carbon monoxide produced by partial burning of carbon feedstock to liberate the oxygen from the iron oxide ores) and the right amount of carbon impurities produces far better iron/steel.
â Luaan
Sep 24 at 7:36
 |Â
show 2 more comments
up vote
9
down vote
Who needs fuel?
Bronze-age peoples made mirrors, so the real question is whether or not there's a bit-o'-metal on the island or even a hugely oiled and polished piece of hardwood that could be used to reflect light. Circle a pot-sized stone with such reflectors and you have a (believably) hot stone and plenty of heat to cook. It's not beyond the imagination that they would discover the value of making concave mirrors to focus the reflected light.
You also have a reasonably good defensive weapon â people will think twice after charging toward a bunch of reflectors (they have the sun god on their side!).
Could they smelt bronze with bronze mirrors, though? Sounds tricky- but even if they do figure it out, where did the bronze for the first smelter-mirror come from?
â Someone Else 37
Sep 27 at 2:03
@SomeoneElse37, Your point is well taken, but it's not part of the OP's question. My answer assumes he's willing to put the necessary metals on the island.
â JBH
Sep 27 at 2:55
The OP did mention that the islanders are in the Bronze Age. I suppose that doesn't rule out bootstrapping a solar-smelter industry using a mirror made from native gold, though, and if a polished bronze mirror can be reflective enough to smelt and alloy copper and tin, then it should be no problem for a gold mirror. Not sure if it can be made to work with wood, though- even the shiniest finishes are pretty transparent, allowing the wood itself to scatter a lot of light. Unless these islanders manage to make some kind of silver paint.
â Someone Else 37
Sep 27 at 17:34
And, of course, the OP might decide to just use bronze mirrors, and leave how the industry was bootstrapped a mystery. That could be interesting too.
â Someone Else 37
Sep 27 at 17:36
add a comment |Â
up vote
9
down vote
Who needs fuel?
Bronze-age peoples made mirrors, so the real question is whether or not there's a bit-o'-metal on the island or even a hugely oiled and polished piece of hardwood that could be used to reflect light. Circle a pot-sized stone with such reflectors and you have a (believably) hot stone and plenty of heat to cook. It's not beyond the imagination that they would discover the value of making concave mirrors to focus the reflected light.
You also have a reasonably good defensive weapon â people will think twice after charging toward a bunch of reflectors (they have the sun god on their side!).
Could they smelt bronze with bronze mirrors, though? Sounds tricky- but even if they do figure it out, where did the bronze for the first smelter-mirror come from?
â Someone Else 37
Sep 27 at 2:03
@SomeoneElse37, Your point is well taken, but it's not part of the OP's question. My answer assumes he's willing to put the necessary metals on the island.
â JBH
Sep 27 at 2:55
The OP did mention that the islanders are in the Bronze Age. I suppose that doesn't rule out bootstrapping a solar-smelter industry using a mirror made from native gold, though, and if a polished bronze mirror can be reflective enough to smelt and alloy copper and tin, then it should be no problem for a gold mirror. Not sure if it can be made to work with wood, though- even the shiniest finishes are pretty transparent, allowing the wood itself to scatter a lot of light. Unless these islanders manage to make some kind of silver paint.
â Someone Else 37
Sep 27 at 17:34
And, of course, the OP might decide to just use bronze mirrors, and leave how the industry was bootstrapped a mystery. That could be interesting too.
â Someone Else 37
Sep 27 at 17:36
add a comment |Â
up vote
9
down vote
up vote
9
down vote
Who needs fuel?
Bronze-age peoples made mirrors, so the real question is whether or not there's a bit-o'-metal on the island or even a hugely oiled and polished piece of hardwood that could be used to reflect light. Circle a pot-sized stone with such reflectors and you have a (believably) hot stone and plenty of heat to cook. It's not beyond the imagination that they would discover the value of making concave mirrors to focus the reflected light.
You also have a reasonably good defensive weapon â people will think twice after charging toward a bunch of reflectors (they have the sun god on their side!).
Who needs fuel?
Bronze-age peoples made mirrors, so the real question is whether or not there's a bit-o'-metal on the island or even a hugely oiled and polished piece of hardwood that could be used to reflect light. Circle a pot-sized stone with such reflectors and you have a (believably) hot stone and plenty of heat to cook. It's not beyond the imagination that they would discover the value of making concave mirrors to focus the reflected light.
You also have a reasonably good defensive weapon â people will think twice after charging toward a bunch of reflectors (they have the sun god on their side!).
answered Sep 21 at 19:15
JBH
35.4k582168
35.4k582168
Could they smelt bronze with bronze mirrors, though? Sounds tricky- but even if they do figure it out, where did the bronze for the first smelter-mirror come from?
â Someone Else 37
Sep 27 at 2:03
@SomeoneElse37, Your point is well taken, but it's not part of the OP's question. My answer assumes he's willing to put the necessary metals on the island.
â JBH
Sep 27 at 2:55
The OP did mention that the islanders are in the Bronze Age. I suppose that doesn't rule out bootstrapping a solar-smelter industry using a mirror made from native gold, though, and if a polished bronze mirror can be reflective enough to smelt and alloy copper and tin, then it should be no problem for a gold mirror. Not sure if it can be made to work with wood, though- even the shiniest finishes are pretty transparent, allowing the wood itself to scatter a lot of light. Unless these islanders manage to make some kind of silver paint.
â Someone Else 37
Sep 27 at 17:34
And, of course, the OP might decide to just use bronze mirrors, and leave how the industry was bootstrapped a mystery. That could be interesting too.
â Someone Else 37
Sep 27 at 17:36
add a comment |Â
Could they smelt bronze with bronze mirrors, though? Sounds tricky- but even if they do figure it out, where did the bronze for the first smelter-mirror come from?
â Someone Else 37
Sep 27 at 2:03
@SomeoneElse37, Your point is well taken, but it's not part of the OP's question. My answer assumes he's willing to put the necessary metals on the island.
â JBH
Sep 27 at 2:55
The OP did mention that the islanders are in the Bronze Age. I suppose that doesn't rule out bootstrapping a solar-smelter industry using a mirror made from native gold, though, and if a polished bronze mirror can be reflective enough to smelt and alloy copper and tin, then it should be no problem for a gold mirror. Not sure if it can be made to work with wood, though- even the shiniest finishes are pretty transparent, allowing the wood itself to scatter a lot of light. Unless these islanders manage to make some kind of silver paint.
â Someone Else 37
Sep 27 at 17:34
And, of course, the OP might decide to just use bronze mirrors, and leave how the industry was bootstrapped a mystery. That could be interesting too.
â Someone Else 37
Sep 27 at 17:36
Could they smelt bronze with bronze mirrors, though? Sounds tricky- but even if they do figure it out, where did the bronze for the first smelter-mirror come from?
â Someone Else 37
Sep 27 at 2:03
Could they smelt bronze with bronze mirrors, though? Sounds tricky- but even if they do figure it out, where did the bronze for the first smelter-mirror come from?
â Someone Else 37
Sep 27 at 2:03
@SomeoneElse37, Your point is well taken, but it's not part of the OP's question. My answer assumes he's willing to put the necessary metals on the island.
â JBH
Sep 27 at 2:55
@SomeoneElse37, Your point is well taken, but it's not part of the OP's question. My answer assumes he's willing to put the necessary metals on the island.
â JBH
Sep 27 at 2:55
The OP did mention that the islanders are in the Bronze Age. I suppose that doesn't rule out bootstrapping a solar-smelter industry using a mirror made from native gold, though, and if a polished bronze mirror can be reflective enough to smelt and alloy copper and tin, then it should be no problem for a gold mirror. Not sure if it can be made to work with wood, though- even the shiniest finishes are pretty transparent, allowing the wood itself to scatter a lot of light. Unless these islanders manage to make some kind of silver paint.
â Someone Else 37
Sep 27 at 17:34
The OP did mention that the islanders are in the Bronze Age. I suppose that doesn't rule out bootstrapping a solar-smelter industry using a mirror made from native gold, though, and if a polished bronze mirror can be reflective enough to smelt and alloy copper and tin, then it should be no problem for a gold mirror. Not sure if it can be made to work with wood, though- even the shiniest finishes are pretty transparent, allowing the wood itself to scatter a lot of light. Unless these islanders manage to make some kind of silver paint.
â Someone Else 37
Sep 27 at 17:34
And, of course, the OP might decide to just use bronze mirrors, and leave how the industry was bootstrapped a mystery. That could be interesting too.
â Someone Else 37
Sep 27 at 17:36
And, of course, the OP might decide to just use bronze mirrors, and leave how the industry was bootstrapped a mystery. That could be interesting too.
â Someone Else 37
Sep 27 at 17:36
add a comment |Â
up vote
9
down vote
Natural Petroleum Seeps?
There are plenty of natural seeps of petroleum, essentially places where crude oil actually rises to the surface and forms puddles. These could be useful for fuel.
What if there are no natural seeps?
If there are no seeps, then perhaps you can have your people naturally discover underground petroleum. Many settlers in America encountered crude oil while drilling for brine.
As for the drilling part, simple cable-tool drilling doesn't require especially advanced tools, but does require a skilled operator (perhaps the art of making holes and bringing fire-sludge to the earthen world could become an art.)
What if they don't drill for oil?
In that case, there is still the possibility of coal. Coal is readily combustible, and finding it underground may involve some troubles (but nothing a little slave labor can't solve!)
What if they can't find coal?
If your people can't find coal, either, there are still a host of things they can burn. Whale oil is one; before the settlers of America discovered crude oil, whales were hunted, so that their copious amounts of blubber could be used as heating oil.
What if they can't kill a whale?
In any case, if there are other animals (terrestrial or marine alike), there is sure to be some fats on their body.
What if they're vegetarian?
There are still a host of things they can burn. These involve driftwood, grass, peat, dried kelp, and dried dung. These all burn to a satisfactory degree, although the dung source, collection, and preparation may be of questionable sanitary standards.
What if they just don't like fire?
If your natives are scared of fire, then mirrors are the solution. Bronze-age people made mirrors, but if they can't make mirrors, a simple transparent bag (jellyfish?) filled with water can act as a makeshift lens and heat things up.
Of course, a large parabolic mirror has frightening burning abilities, and if you were to ask me, I would stick with the fire.
1
I doubt a culture that can produce bronze would be scared of fire :P
â Luaan
Sep 24 at 7:37
add a comment |Â
up vote
9
down vote
Natural Petroleum Seeps?
There are plenty of natural seeps of petroleum, essentially places where crude oil actually rises to the surface and forms puddles. These could be useful for fuel.
What if there are no natural seeps?
If there are no seeps, then perhaps you can have your people naturally discover underground petroleum. Many settlers in America encountered crude oil while drilling for brine.
As for the drilling part, simple cable-tool drilling doesn't require especially advanced tools, but does require a skilled operator (perhaps the art of making holes and bringing fire-sludge to the earthen world could become an art.)
What if they don't drill for oil?
In that case, there is still the possibility of coal. Coal is readily combustible, and finding it underground may involve some troubles (but nothing a little slave labor can't solve!)
What if they can't find coal?
If your people can't find coal, either, there are still a host of things they can burn. Whale oil is one; before the settlers of America discovered crude oil, whales were hunted, so that their copious amounts of blubber could be used as heating oil.
What if they can't kill a whale?
In any case, if there are other animals (terrestrial or marine alike), there is sure to be some fats on their body.
What if they're vegetarian?
There are still a host of things they can burn. These involve driftwood, grass, peat, dried kelp, and dried dung. These all burn to a satisfactory degree, although the dung source, collection, and preparation may be of questionable sanitary standards.
What if they just don't like fire?
If your natives are scared of fire, then mirrors are the solution. Bronze-age people made mirrors, but if they can't make mirrors, a simple transparent bag (jellyfish?) filled with water can act as a makeshift lens and heat things up.
Of course, a large parabolic mirror has frightening burning abilities, and if you were to ask me, I would stick with the fire.
1
I doubt a culture that can produce bronze would be scared of fire :P
â Luaan
Sep 24 at 7:37
add a comment |Â
up vote
9
down vote
up vote
9
down vote
Natural Petroleum Seeps?
There are plenty of natural seeps of petroleum, essentially places where crude oil actually rises to the surface and forms puddles. These could be useful for fuel.
What if there are no natural seeps?
If there are no seeps, then perhaps you can have your people naturally discover underground petroleum. Many settlers in America encountered crude oil while drilling for brine.
As for the drilling part, simple cable-tool drilling doesn't require especially advanced tools, but does require a skilled operator (perhaps the art of making holes and bringing fire-sludge to the earthen world could become an art.)
What if they don't drill for oil?
In that case, there is still the possibility of coal. Coal is readily combustible, and finding it underground may involve some troubles (but nothing a little slave labor can't solve!)
What if they can't find coal?
If your people can't find coal, either, there are still a host of things they can burn. Whale oil is one; before the settlers of America discovered crude oil, whales were hunted, so that their copious amounts of blubber could be used as heating oil.
What if they can't kill a whale?
In any case, if there are other animals (terrestrial or marine alike), there is sure to be some fats on their body.
What if they're vegetarian?
There are still a host of things they can burn. These involve driftwood, grass, peat, dried kelp, and dried dung. These all burn to a satisfactory degree, although the dung source, collection, and preparation may be of questionable sanitary standards.
What if they just don't like fire?
If your natives are scared of fire, then mirrors are the solution. Bronze-age people made mirrors, but if they can't make mirrors, a simple transparent bag (jellyfish?) filled with water can act as a makeshift lens and heat things up.
Of course, a large parabolic mirror has frightening burning abilities, and if you were to ask me, I would stick with the fire.
Natural Petroleum Seeps?
There are plenty of natural seeps of petroleum, essentially places where crude oil actually rises to the surface and forms puddles. These could be useful for fuel.
What if there are no natural seeps?
If there are no seeps, then perhaps you can have your people naturally discover underground petroleum. Many settlers in America encountered crude oil while drilling for brine.
As for the drilling part, simple cable-tool drilling doesn't require especially advanced tools, but does require a skilled operator (perhaps the art of making holes and bringing fire-sludge to the earthen world could become an art.)
What if they don't drill for oil?
In that case, there is still the possibility of coal. Coal is readily combustible, and finding it underground may involve some troubles (but nothing a little slave labor can't solve!)
What if they can't find coal?
If your people can't find coal, either, there are still a host of things they can burn. Whale oil is one; before the settlers of America discovered crude oil, whales were hunted, so that their copious amounts of blubber could be used as heating oil.
What if they can't kill a whale?
In any case, if there are other animals (terrestrial or marine alike), there is sure to be some fats on their body.
What if they're vegetarian?
There are still a host of things they can burn. These involve driftwood, grass, peat, dried kelp, and dried dung. These all burn to a satisfactory degree, although the dung source, collection, and preparation may be of questionable sanitary standards.
What if they just don't like fire?
If your natives are scared of fire, then mirrors are the solution. Bronze-age people made mirrors, but if they can't make mirrors, a simple transparent bag (jellyfish?) filled with water can act as a makeshift lens and heat things up.
Of course, a large parabolic mirror has frightening burning abilities, and if you were to ask me, I would stick with the fire.
answered Sep 22 at 2:59
Adrian Zhang
536311
536311
1
I doubt a culture that can produce bronze would be scared of fire :P
â Luaan
Sep 24 at 7:37
add a comment |Â
1
I doubt a culture that can produce bronze would be scared of fire :P
â Luaan
Sep 24 at 7:37
1
1
I doubt a culture that can produce bronze would be scared of fire :P
â Luaan
Sep 24 at 7:37
I doubt a culture that can produce bronze would be scared of fire :P
â Luaan
Sep 24 at 7:37
add a comment |Â
up vote
6
down vote
Dry Dung Fuel
Essentially you take poop, dry it and then burn it later. This is a cheap and efficient fuel for homes and cooking that has been used throughout history and is still used today.
It works with both farm animal poop or human poop, so your villagers do not need to change much in order to use it, the only processing is to dry the fuel which can be done with just the sun.
There is a known issue with air quality when it is used to much but anything burned will have air quality issues. Assuming it is the bronze age it should almost be a non-factor.
2
(Also mentioned in @ShadoCat's answer)
â Qami
Sep 21 at 20:01
add a comment |Â
up vote
6
down vote
Dry Dung Fuel
Essentially you take poop, dry it and then burn it later. This is a cheap and efficient fuel for homes and cooking that has been used throughout history and is still used today.
It works with both farm animal poop or human poop, so your villagers do not need to change much in order to use it, the only processing is to dry the fuel which can be done with just the sun.
There is a known issue with air quality when it is used to much but anything burned will have air quality issues. Assuming it is the bronze age it should almost be a non-factor.
2
(Also mentioned in @ShadoCat's answer)
â Qami
Sep 21 at 20:01
add a comment |Â
up vote
6
down vote
up vote
6
down vote
Dry Dung Fuel
Essentially you take poop, dry it and then burn it later. This is a cheap and efficient fuel for homes and cooking that has been used throughout history and is still used today.
It works with both farm animal poop or human poop, so your villagers do not need to change much in order to use it, the only processing is to dry the fuel which can be done with just the sun.
There is a known issue with air quality when it is used to much but anything burned will have air quality issues. Assuming it is the bronze age it should almost be a non-factor.
Dry Dung Fuel
Essentially you take poop, dry it and then burn it later. This is a cheap and efficient fuel for homes and cooking that has been used throughout history and is still used today.
It works with both farm animal poop or human poop, so your villagers do not need to change much in order to use it, the only processing is to dry the fuel which can be done with just the sun.
There is a known issue with air quality when it is used to much but anything burned will have air quality issues. Assuming it is the bronze age it should almost be a non-factor.
answered Sep 21 at 19:31
Reed
1,612411
1,612411
2
(Also mentioned in @ShadoCat's answer)
â Qami
Sep 21 at 20:01
add a comment |Â
2
(Also mentioned in @ShadoCat's answer)
â Qami
Sep 21 at 20:01
2
2
(Also mentioned in @ShadoCat's answer)
â Qami
Sep 21 at 20:01
(Also mentioned in @ShadoCat's answer)
â Qami
Sep 21 at 20:01
add a comment |Â
up vote
6
down vote
Not only dry dung, but any dry organics is OK. If people are on the island, dry seaweeds are the best. You have heaps of them on the beach, and you even needn't enter the sacred inner land to collect them.
And you can play with strange stuffs that can be contained by the weeds and can influence something ( be a medicine, slow poison, a light drug)
add a comment |Â
up vote
6
down vote
Not only dry dung, but any dry organics is OK. If people are on the island, dry seaweeds are the best. You have heaps of them on the beach, and you even needn't enter the sacred inner land to collect them.
And you can play with strange stuffs that can be contained by the weeds and can influence something ( be a medicine, slow poison, a light drug)
add a comment |Â
up vote
6
down vote
up vote
6
down vote
Not only dry dung, but any dry organics is OK. If people are on the island, dry seaweeds are the best. You have heaps of them on the beach, and you even needn't enter the sacred inner land to collect them.
And you can play with strange stuffs that can be contained by the weeds and can influence something ( be a medicine, slow poison, a light drug)
Not only dry dung, but any dry organics is OK. If people are on the island, dry seaweeds are the best. You have heaps of them on the beach, and you even needn't enter the sacred inner land to collect them.
And you can play with strange stuffs that can be contained by the weeds and can influence something ( be a medicine, slow poison, a light drug)
answered Sep 21 at 21:34
Gangnus
1,51139
1,51139
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
Bronze Age means long distance trade
Making bronze requires smelting ores of (at least) two metals: copper and tin. Usable copper ores are much less common than iron, but they aren't extremely rare. Tin, on the other hand, is rare. Not as rare as the precious metals, but not all that far from it. China and Southeast Asia had (and still have) the most abundant sources of tin; Europe very few; and most of the rest of the world, practically none. Furthermore, in Europe tin ores were mainly found as pegmatitic "hard rock mining" -- especially granite, one of the hardest stones. (Asia had another advantage here: the deposits in Southeast Asia are alluvial. That is, the tin ores have been released from hard rock by erosion, and ended up in riverbeds, concentrated by their high density.)
That meant that the Bronze Age coincided with the development of long distance trading networks and the large scale stable empires that could support them; and that tin mining coincided with the development of serious masonry engineering.
So, does your island contain tin deposits?
No, this island does not mine tin. Fuel is only one of their problems. Being on an island, they will especially want timber for boats. With a need to import expensive tin, a shortage of boats, as well as fuel restrictions, you will need some way to explain how this culture could survive as a Bronze Age civilisation. It's not impossible, but they will probably need some other valuable export to explain how they fit in the trading network. Without naval power to protect it, you will also need to explain why others can't just take control of this resource.
No, this island does not mine tin, and it also isn't an economic power. Sorry, with all its disadvantages, I don't believe it is likely for your island to achieve Bronze Age technology.
Yes, it has significant tin deposits. You don't really need to worry about fuel; your island is the industrial heartland of a wealthy empire. Their trading network can supply them with fuel, food, and any other commodities they require. They also are probably building with granite masonry, not mud. However if the tin reserves are depleted, they will quickly collapse. Retaining control over this valuable resource will probably require serious military strength.
Wait, what about the fuel?
OK, I rabbited on about other issues without answering your actual question -- although others have answered it pretty well. Different cultures at different times have used a range of fuels for cooking and industry, and any of them might suit. Coal is probably the best, but it really isn't that big an issue. The one thing for which wood is absolutely irreplaceable for a Bronze Age civilisation is not fuel, but boats. Sure, you can make kayaks and coracles from animal skin, but you aren't going to haul tons of tin from Cornwall to Cyprus in a coracle.
With no timber, the only fishing will be casting nets from the shore, which for an island people means a serious reduction in resources, especially protein supply. There will be no trade, no cultural exchange. There will be no navy.
You also need to consider the impact of no land clearing. Sure, excessive land clearing will damage their environment; but having none at all will make it hard to grow crops, or pasture for livestock. Minimal fishing, no livestock, no trade, subsistence cropping between trees; your islanders will be desperately poor, and a few bad years could exterminate them.
Actually, it's thought that bronze was originally made with copper and arsenic, rather than tin. Arsenic is a rather common impurity in copper ores. The first bronze-makers pretty much had "bronze ore" to work with. Even the much later discovery (about 2000 years later, as far as we can tell) of copper+tin = bronze seems to have been the same way - tin impurities in copper ore. However, people somehow very quickly learned to mine tin separately and add it to copper to make bronze - and that's where trade networks necessarily come in.
â Luaan
Sep 24 at 7:41
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
Bronze Age means long distance trade
Making bronze requires smelting ores of (at least) two metals: copper and tin. Usable copper ores are much less common than iron, but they aren't extremely rare. Tin, on the other hand, is rare. Not as rare as the precious metals, but not all that far from it. China and Southeast Asia had (and still have) the most abundant sources of tin; Europe very few; and most of the rest of the world, practically none. Furthermore, in Europe tin ores were mainly found as pegmatitic "hard rock mining" -- especially granite, one of the hardest stones. (Asia had another advantage here: the deposits in Southeast Asia are alluvial. That is, the tin ores have been released from hard rock by erosion, and ended up in riverbeds, concentrated by their high density.)
That meant that the Bronze Age coincided with the development of long distance trading networks and the large scale stable empires that could support them; and that tin mining coincided with the development of serious masonry engineering.
So, does your island contain tin deposits?
No, this island does not mine tin. Fuel is only one of their problems. Being on an island, they will especially want timber for boats. With a need to import expensive tin, a shortage of boats, as well as fuel restrictions, you will need some way to explain how this culture could survive as a Bronze Age civilisation. It's not impossible, but they will probably need some other valuable export to explain how they fit in the trading network. Without naval power to protect it, you will also need to explain why others can't just take control of this resource.
No, this island does not mine tin, and it also isn't an economic power. Sorry, with all its disadvantages, I don't believe it is likely for your island to achieve Bronze Age technology.
Yes, it has significant tin deposits. You don't really need to worry about fuel; your island is the industrial heartland of a wealthy empire. Their trading network can supply them with fuel, food, and any other commodities they require. They also are probably building with granite masonry, not mud. However if the tin reserves are depleted, they will quickly collapse. Retaining control over this valuable resource will probably require serious military strength.
Wait, what about the fuel?
OK, I rabbited on about other issues without answering your actual question -- although others have answered it pretty well. Different cultures at different times have used a range of fuels for cooking and industry, and any of them might suit. Coal is probably the best, but it really isn't that big an issue. The one thing for which wood is absolutely irreplaceable for a Bronze Age civilisation is not fuel, but boats. Sure, you can make kayaks and coracles from animal skin, but you aren't going to haul tons of tin from Cornwall to Cyprus in a coracle.
With no timber, the only fishing will be casting nets from the shore, which for an island people means a serious reduction in resources, especially protein supply. There will be no trade, no cultural exchange. There will be no navy.
You also need to consider the impact of no land clearing. Sure, excessive land clearing will damage their environment; but having none at all will make it hard to grow crops, or pasture for livestock. Minimal fishing, no livestock, no trade, subsistence cropping between trees; your islanders will be desperately poor, and a few bad years could exterminate them.
Actually, it's thought that bronze was originally made with copper and arsenic, rather than tin. Arsenic is a rather common impurity in copper ores. The first bronze-makers pretty much had "bronze ore" to work with. Even the much later discovery (about 2000 years later, as far as we can tell) of copper+tin = bronze seems to have been the same way - tin impurities in copper ore. However, people somehow very quickly learned to mine tin separately and add it to copper to make bronze - and that's where trade networks necessarily come in.
â Luaan
Sep 24 at 7:41
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
up vote
3
down vote
Bronze Age means long distance trade
Making bronze requires smelting ores of (at least) two metals: copper and tin. Usable copper ores are much less common than iron, but they aren't extremely rare. Tin, on the other hand, is rare. Not as rare as the precious metals, but not all that far from it. China and Southeast Asia had (and still have) the most abundant sources of tin; Europe very few; and most of the rest of the world, practically none. Furthermore, in Europe tin ores were mainly found as pegmatitic "hard rock mining" -- especially granite, one of the hardest stones. (Asia had another advantage here: the deposits in Southeast Asia are alluvial. That is, the tin ores have been released from hard rock by erosion, and ended up in riverbeds, concentrated by their high density.)
That meant that the Bronze Age coincided with the development of long distance trading networks and the large scale stable empires that could support them; and that tin mining coincided with the development of serious masonry engineering.
So, does your island contain tin deposits?
No, this island does not mine tin. Fuel is only one of their problems. Being on an island, they will especially want timber for boats. With a need to import expensive tin, a shortage of boats, as well as fuel restrictions, you will need some way to explain how this culture could survive as a Bronze Age civilisation. It's not impossible, but they will probably need some other valuable export to explain how they fit in the trading network. Without naval power to protect it, you will also need to explain why others can't just take control of this resource.
No, this island does not mine tin, and it also isn't an economic power. Sorry, with all its disadvantages, I don't believe it is likely for your island to achieve Bronze Age technology.
Yes, it has significant tin deposits. You don't really need to worry about fuel; your island is the industrial heartland of a wealthy empire. Their trading network can supply them with fuel, food, and any other commodities they require. They also are probably building with granite masonry, not mud. However if the tin reserves are depleted, they will quickly collapse. Retaining control over this valuable resource will probably require serious military strength.
Wait, what about the fuel?
OK, I rabbited on about other issues without answering your actual question -- although others have answered it pretty well. Different cultures at different times have used a range of fuels for cooking and industry, and any of them might suit. Coal is probably the best, but it really isn't that big an issue. The one thing for which wood is absolutely irreplaceable for a Bronze Age civilisation is not fuel, but boats. Sure, you can make kayaks and coracles from animal skin, but you aren't going to haul tons of tin from Cornwall to Cyprus in a coracle.
With no timber, the only fishing will be casting nets from the shore, which for an island people means a serious reduction in resources, especially protein supply. There will be no trade, no cultural exchange. There will be no navy.
You also need to consider the impact of no land clearing. Sure, excessive land clearing will damage their environment; but having none at all will make it hard to grow crops, or pasture for livestock. Minimal fishing, no livestock, no trade, subsistence cropping between trees; your islanders will be desperately poor, and a few bad years could exterminate them.
Bronze Age means long distance trade
Making bronze requires smelting ores of (at least) two metals: copper and tin. Usable copper ores are much less common than iron, but they aren't extremely rare. Tin, on the other hand, is rare. Not as rare as the precious metals, but not all that far from it. China and Southeast Asia had (and still have) the most abundant sources of tin; Europe very few; and most of the rest of the world, practically none. Furthermore, in Europe tin ores were mainly found as pegmatitic "hard rock mining" -- especially granite, one of the hardest stones. (Asia had another advantage here: the deposits in Southeast Asia are alluvial. That is, the tin ores have been released from hard rock by erosion, and ended up in riverbeds, concentrated by their high density.)
That meant that the Bronze Age coincided with the development of long distance trading networks and the large scale stable empires that could support them; and that tin mining coincided with the development of serious masonry engineering.
So, does your island contain tin deposits?
No, this island does not mine tin. Fuel is only one of their problems. Being on an island, they will especially want timber for boats. With a need to import expensive tin, a shortage of boats, as well as fuel restrictions, you will need some way to explain how this culture could survive as a Bronze Age civilisation. It's not impossible, but they will probably need some other valuable export to explain how they fit in the trading network. Without naval power to protect it, you will also need to explain why others can't just take control of this resource.
No, this island does not mine tin, and it also isn't an economic power. Sorry, with all its disadvantages, I don't believe it is likely for your island to achieve Bronze Age technology.
Yes, it has significant tin deposits. You don't really need to worry about fuel; your island is the industrial heartland of a wealthy empire. Their trading network can supply them with fuel, food, and any other commodities they require. They also are probably building with granite masonry, not mud. However if the tin reserves are depleted, they will quickly collapse. Retaining control over this valuable resource will probably require serious military strength.
Wait, what about the fuel?
OK, I rabbited on about other issues without answering your actual question -- although others have answered it pretty well. Different cultures at different times have used a range of fuels for cooking and industry, and any of them might suit. Coal is probably the best, but it really isn't that big an issue. The one thing for which wood is absolutely irreplaceable for a Bronze Age civilisation is not fuel, but boats. Sure, you can make kayaks and coracles from animal skin, but you aren't going to haul tons of tin from Cornwall to Cyprus in a coracle.
With no timber, the only fishing will be casting nets from the shore, which for an island people means a serious reduction in resources, especially protein supply. There will be no trade, no cultural exchange. There will be no navy.
You also need to consider the impact of no land clearing. Sure, excessive land clearing will damage their environment; but having none at all will make it hard to grow crops, or pasture for livestock. Minimal fishing, no livestock, no trade, subsistence cropping between trees; your islanders will be desperately poor, and a few bad years could exterminate them.
answered Sep 23 at 8:30
Securiger
2,327138
2,327138
Actually, it's thought that bronze was originally made with copper and arsenic, rather than tin. Arsenic is a rather common impurity in copper ores. The first bronze-makers pretty much had "bronze ore" to work with. Even the much later discovery (about 2000 years later, as far as we can tell) of copper+tin = bronze seems to have been the same way - tin impurities in copper ore. However, people somehow very quickly learned to mine tin separately and add it to copper to make bronze - and that's where trade networks necessarily come in.
â Luaan
Sep 24 at 7:41
add a comment |Â
Actually, it's thought that bronze was originally made with copper and arsenic, rather than tin. Arsenic is a rather common impurity in copper ores. The first bronze-makers pretty much had "bronze ore" to work with. Even the much later discovery (about 2000 years later, as far as we can tell) of copper+tin = bronze seems to have been the same way - tin impurities in copper ore. However, people somehow very quickly learned to mine tin separately and add it to copper to make bronze - and that's where trade networks necessarily come in.
â Luaan
Sep 24 at 7:41
Actually, it's thought that bronze was originally made with copper and arsenic, rather than tin. Arsenic is a rather common impurity in copper ores. The first bronze-makers pretty much had "bronze ore" to work with. Even the much later discovery (about 2000 years later, as far as we can tell) of copper+tin = bronze seems to have been the same way - tin impurities in copper ore. However, people somehow very quickly learned to mine tin separately and add it to copper to make bronze - and that's where trade networks necessarily come in.
â Luaan
Sep 24 at 7:41
Actually, it's thought that bronze was originally made with copper and arsenic, rather than tin. Arsenic is a rather common impurity in copper ores. The first bronze-makers pretty much had "bronze ore" to work with. Even the much later discovery (about 2000 years later, as far as we can tell) of copper+tin = bronze seems to have been the same way - tin impurities in copper ore. However, people somehow very quickly learned to mine tin separately and add it to copper to make bronze - and that's where trade networks necessarily come in.
â Luaan
Sep 24 at 7:41
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
Lava
Maybe there is volcano on the islan and there is hot lava inside - then you have as much heat, as you need.
If there is small, but stable lava stream going to sea (as infinite sink - at least for few decades, but even milenia, long enough to grow some technology around), the better - you can cook in the watter near it, use boulders to place there and then move elsewhere to provide temporary heat source, you can even make small side streams by blocking the main one, (until it overflows the sides at weekened points and then again stop, as the blocking boulder are melt and washed away) which can double for metal melting with some preparation, having sized peaces of metal, you can heat them over lava and then hammered (blacksmiths) to any form needed.
Also having lava drips somewhere could make for stone rods, which (after some manufacturing - stone-age techniques) may be of different use - from harpoon spikes, to maybe axis for wheels ...
Even some simple (stationary) steam engines can be build and filled with watter regularry to do some work - or just cooking, desinfection ...
Maybe there would be even some sources of sulphur (for basic alchemy) and watter plants, which are not sancted, so after drying could be used as fuel source as well as source of "wooden coal", so even black powder is not out of reach ...
Pushing wet trees of water plants to the lava and fast removing them can even provides some stone pipes (with burned watter plant inside, but with good training and practice it could be possible make some - then improve it by using these watter plants and sand to make them somehow regular for various use :)
Molten rock gives off quite a bit of radiative heat. I doubt you'd be able to get close enough to a surface lava flow to cook anything. Dwarf Fortress isn't the most realistic depiction of the world :P Subterranean flows heating the rock above isn't without trouble either - you'd need some sort of isolation to make sure you can reach the cooking spot safely - but it might be doable.
â Luaan
Sep 24 at 7:46
Peoples on volcanic islands, such as the Polynesians, tended to favor wooden sources of heat because lava is very to difficult to contain and use properly and consistently, so saying that that could function as the basis for all their infrastructure is a bit of a stretch.
â Bewilderer
Sep 24 at 14:47
Well, I agree, but the OP stated clearly, that wood is sacred and out of limits. So I recomend lava as heat source, as it allows at least somehow get heat (even when hard to manage and a lot of preparations needs to be done to approch lava safely) as other sources (like coal, grass ... ) was mentioned in other answers. It is no way perfect, but sometimes may be better than nothing.
â gilhad
Sep 24 at 16:11
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
Lava
Maybe there is volcano on the islan and there is hot lava inside - then you have as much heat, as you need.
If there is small, but stable lava stream going to sea (as infinite sink - at least for few decades, but even milenia, long enough to grow some technology around), the better - you can cook in the watter near it, use boulders to place there and then move elsewhere to provide temporary heat source, you can even make small side streams by blocking the main one, (until it overflows the sides at weekened points and then again stop, as the blocking boulder are melt and washed away) which can double for metal melting with some preparation, having sized peaces of metal, you can heat them over lava and then hammered (blacksmiths) to any form needed.
Also having lava drips somewhere could make for stone rods, which (after some manufacturing - stone-age techniques) may be of different use - from harpoon spikes, to maybe axis for wheels ...
Even some simple (stationary) steam engines can be build and filled with watter regularry to do some work - or just cooking, desinfection ...
Maybe there would be even some sources of sulphur (for basic alchemy) and watter plants, which are not sancted, so after drying could be used as fuel source as well as source of "wooden coal", so even black powder is not out of reach ...
Pushing wet trees of water plants to the lava and fast removing them can even provides some stone pipes (with burned watter plant inside, but with good training and practice it could be possible make some - then improve it by using these watter plants and sand to make them somehow regular for various use :)
Molten rock gives off quite a bit of radiative heat. I doubt you'd be able to get close enough to a surface lava flow to cook anything. Dwarf Fortress isn't the most realistic depiction of the world :P Subterranean flows heating the rock above isn't without trouble either - you'd need some sort of isolation to make sure you can reach the cooking spot safely - but it might be doable.
â Luaan
Sep 24 at 7:46
Peoples on volcanic islands, such as the Polynesians, tended to favor wooden sources of heat because lava is very to difficult to contain and use properly and consistently, so saying that that could function as the basis for all their infrastructure is a bit of a stretch.
â Bewilderer
Sep 24 at 14:47
Well, I agree, but the OP stated clearly, that wood is sacred and out of limits. So I recomend lava as heat source, as it allows at least somehow get heat (even when hard to manage and a lot of preparations needs to be done to approch lava safely) as other sources (like coal, grass ... ) was mentioned in other answers. It is no way perfect, but sometimes may be better than nothing.
â gilhad
Sep 24 at 16:11
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
Lava
Maybe there is volcano on the islan and there is hot lava inside - then you have as much heat, as you need.
If there is small, but stable lava stream going to sea (as infinite sink - at least for few decades, but even milenia, long enough to grow some technology around), the better - you can cook in the watter near it, use boulders to place there and then move elsewhere to provide temporary heat source, you can even make small side streams by blocking the main one, (until it overflows the sides at weekened points and then again stop, as the blocking boulder are melt and washed away) which can double for metal melting with some preparation, having sized peaces of metal, you can heat them over lava and then hammered (blacksmiths) to any form needed.
Also having lava drips somewhere could make for stone rods, which (after some manufacturing - stone-age techniques) may be of different use - from harpoon spikes, to maybe axis for wheels ...
Even some simple (stationary) steam engines can be build and filled with watter regularry to do some work - or just cooking, desinfection ...
Maybe there would be even some sources of sulphur (for basic alchemy) and watter plants, which are not sancted, so after drying could be used as fuel source as well as source of "wooden coal", so even black powder is not out of reach ...
Pushing wet trees of water plants to the lava and fast removing them can even provides some stone pipes (with burned watter plant inside, but with good training and practice it could be possible make some - then improve it by using these watter plants and sand to make them somehow regular for various use :)
Lava
Maybe there is volcano on the islan and there is hot lava inside - then you have as much heat, as you need.
If there is small, but stable lava stream going to sea (as infinite sink - at least for few decades, but even milenia, long enough to grow some technology around), the better - you can cook in the watter near it, use boulders to place there and then move elsewhere to provide temporary heat source, you can even make small side streams by blocking the main one, (until it overflows the sides at weekened points and then again stop, as the blocking boulder are melt and washed away) which can double for metal melting with some preparation, having sized peaces of metal, you can heat them over lava and then hammered (blacksmiths) to any form needed.
Also having lava drips somewhere could make for stone rods, which (after some manufacturing - stone-age techniques) may be of different use - from harpoon spikes, to maybe axis for wheels ...
Even some simple (stationary) steam engines can be build and filled with watter regularry to do some work - or just cooking, desinfection ...
Maybe there would be even some sources of sulphur (for basic alchemy) and watter plants, which are not sancted, so after drying could be used as fuel source as well as source of "wooden coal", so even black powder is not out of reach ...
Pushing wet trees of water plants to the lava and fast removing them can even provides some stone pipes (with burned watter plant inside, but with good training and practice it could be possible make some - then improve it by using these watter plants and sand to make them somehow regular for various use :)
answered Sep 22 at 14:02
gilhad
92648
92648
Molten rock gives off quite a bit of radiative heat. I doubt you'd be able to get close enough to a surface lava flow to cook anything. Dwarf Fortress isn't the most realistic depiction of the world :P Subterranean flows heating the rock above isn't without trouble either - you'd need some sort of isolation to make sure you can reach the cooking spot safely - but it might be doable.
â Luaan
Sep 24 at 7:46
Peoples on volcanic islands, such as the Polynesians, tended to favor wooden sources of heat because lava is very to difficult to contain and use properly and consistently, so saying that that could function as the basis for all their infrastructure is a bit of a stretch.
â Bewilderer
Sep 24 at 14:47
Well, I agree, but the OP stated clearly, that wood is sacred and out of limits. So I recomend lava as heat source, as it allows at least somehow get heat (even when hard to manage and a lot of preparations needs to be done to approch lava safely) as other sources (like coal, grass ... ) was mentioned in other answers. It is no way perfect, but sometimes may be better than nothing.
â gilhad
Sep 24 at 16:11
add a comment |Â
Molten rock gives off quite a bit of radiative heat. I doubt you'd be able to get close enough to a surface lava flow to cook anything. Dwarf Fortress isn't the most realistic depiction of the world :P Subterranean flows heating the rock above isn't without trouble either - you'd need some sort of isolation to make sure you can reach the cooking spot safely - but it might be doable.
â Luaan
Sep 24 at 7:46
Peoples on volcanic islands, such as the Polynesians, tended to favor wooden sources of heat because lava is very to difficult to contain and use properly and consistently, so saying that that could function as the basis for all their infrastructure is a bit of a stretch.
â Bewilderer
Sep 24 at 14:47
Well, I agree, but the OP stated clearly, that wood is sacred and out of limits. So I recomend lava as heat source, as it allows at least somehow get heat (even when hard to manage and a lot of preparations needs to be done to approch lava safely) as other sources (like coal, grass ... ) was mentioned in other answers. It is no way perfect, but sometimes may be better than nothing.
â gilhad
Sep 24 at 16:11
Molten rock gives off quite a bit of radiative heat. I doubt you'd be able to get close enough to a surface lava flow to cook anything. Dwarf Fortress isn't the most realistic depiction of the world :P Subterranean flows heating the rock above isn't without trouble either - you'd need some sort of isolation to make sure you can reach the cooking spot safely - but it might be doable.
â Luaan
Sep 24 at 7:46
Molten rock gives off quite a bit of radiative heat. I doubt you'd be able to get close enough to a surface lava flow to cook anything. Dwarf Fortress isn't the most realistic depiction of the world :P Subterranean flows heating the rock above isn't without trouble either - you'd need some sort of isolation to make sure you can reach the cooking spot safely - but it might be doable.
â Luaan
Sep 24 at 7:46
Peoples on volcanic islands, such as the Polynesians, tended to favor wooden sources of heat because lava is very to difficult to contain and use properly and consistently, so saying that that could function as the basis for all their infrastructure is a bit of a stretch.
â Bewilderer
Sep 24 at 14:47
Peoples on volcanic islands, such as the Polynesians, tended to favor wooden sources of heat because lava is very to difficult to contain and use properly and consistently, so saying that that could function as the basis for all their infrastructure is a bit of a stretch.
â Bewilderer
Sep 24 at 14:47
Well, I agree, but the OP stated clearly, that wood is sacred and out of limits. So I recomend lava as heat source, as it allows at least somehow get heat (even when hard to manage and a lot of preparations needs to be done to approch lava safely) as other sources (like coal, grass ... ) was mentioned in other answers. It is no way perfect, but sometimes may be better than nothing.
â gilhad
Sep 24 at 16:11
Well, I agree, but the OP stated clearly, that wood is sacred and out of limits. So I recomend lava as heat source, as it allows at least somehow get heat (even when hard to manage and a lot of preparations needs to be done to approch lava safely) as other sources (like coal, grass ... ) was mentioned in other answers. It is no way perfect, but sometimes may be better than nothing.
â gilhad
Sep 24 at 16:11
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
In addition to animal oils, fossil fuels are always an option. Easily tappable crude oil, coal deposits, etc.
This does not provide an answer to the question. To critique or request clarification from an author, leave a comment below their post. - From Review
â L.Dutchâ¦
Sep 22 at 14:26
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
In addition to animal oils, fossil fuels are always an option. Easily tappable crude oil, coal deposits, etc.
This does not provide an answer to the question. To critique or request clarification from an author, leave a comment below their post. - From Review
â L.Dutchâ¦
Sep 22 at 14:26
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
In addition to animal oils, fossil fuels are always an option. Easily tappable crude oil, coal deposits, etc.
In addition to animal oils, fossil fuels are always an option. Easily tappable crude oil, coal deposits, etc.
answered Sep 21 at 17:21
Gene
3795
3795
This does not provide an answer to the question. To critique or request clarification from an author, leave a comment below their post. - From Review
â L.Dutchâ¦
Sep 22 at 14:26
add a comment |Â
This does not provide an answer to the question. To critique or request clarification from an author, leave a comment below their post. - From Review
â L.Dutchâ¦
Sep 22 at 14:26
This does not provide an answer to the question. To critique or request clarification from an author, leave a comment below their post. - From Review
â L.Dutchâ¦
Sep 22 at 14:26
This does not provide an answer to the question. To critique or request clarification from an author, leave a comment below their post. - From Review
â L.Dutchâ¦
Sep 22 at 14:26
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
What they need is energy/fuel for fire. So they can:
1. Bake/cook/roast food
2. Have light in the night
3. Have a source of heat (for cold nights?)
4. Work on metal/forging
That can be replaced with:
1. Mirrored and centred light for heating a pot.
2. Have oil lights or have light bug pets in a cage
3. Use better clothing in the night
4. Hard... more mirrors?, but since the form is changing its had to focus the light on the metal, at this point coal isn't bad
In the ends they could also harvest organic material an collect and compress the decay gases, to make a gas grill
;)
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
What they need is energy/fuel for fire. So they can:
1. Bake/cook/roast food
2. Have light in the night
3. Have a source of heat (for cold nights?)
4. Work on metal/forging
That can be replaced with:
1. Mirrored and centred light for heating a pot.
2. Have oil lights or have light bug pets in a cage
3. Use better clothing in the night
4. Hard... more mirrors?, but since the form is changing its had to focus the light on the metal, at this point coal isn't bad
In the ends they could also harvest organic material an collect and compress the decay gases, to make a gas grill
;)
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
What they need is energy/fuel for fire. So they can:
1. Bake/cook/roast food
2. Have light in the night
3. Have a source of heat (for cold nights?)
4. Work on metal/forging
That can be replaced with:
1. Mirrored and centred light for heating a pot.
2. Have oil lights or have light bug pets in a cage
3. Use better clothing in the night
4. Hard... more mirrors?, but since the form is changing its had to focus the light on the metal, at this point coal isn't bad
In the ends they could also harvest organic material an collect and compress the decay gases, to make a gas grill
;)
What they need is energy/fuel for fire. So they can:
1. Bake/cook/roast food
2. Have light in the night
3. Have a source of heat (for cold nights?)
4. Work on metal/forging
That can be replaced with:
1. Mirrored and centred light for heating a pot.
2. Have oil lights or have light bug pets in a cage
3. Use better clothing in the night
4. Hard... more mirrors?, but since the form is changing its had to focus the light on the metal, at this point coal isn't bad
In the ends they could also harvest organic material an collect and compress the decay gases, to make a gas grill
;)
answered Sep 24 at 10:43
Jannis
35610
35610
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
Geothermal energy ?
The romans used to heat their houses with hypocausts :
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypocaust
Using extremely hot water from hot springs could be used instead of fire.
Then you could use alternative ressources for other uses, but you can save a lot on heating fuel ressources.
1
Hypocaust was not geothermal energy. Somebody had to lit a fire to heat up the floor.
â L.Dutchâ¦
Sep 26 at 11:40
I know, but you could probably make the same system using a hot spring.
â Aël
Sep 26 at 15:44
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
Geothermal energy ?
The romans used to heat their houses with hypocausts :
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypocaust
Using extremely hot water from hot springs could be used instead of fire.
Then you could use alternative ressources for other uses, but you can save a lot on heating fuel ressources.
1
Hypocaust was not geothermal energy. Somebody had to lit a fire to heat up the floor.
â L.Dutchâ¦
Sep 26 at 11:40
I know, but you could probably make the same system using a hot spring.
â Aël
Sep 26 at 15:44
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
Geothermal energy ?
The romans used to heat their houses with hypocausts :
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypocaust
Using extremely hot water from hot springs could be used instead of fire.
Then you could use alternative ressources for other uses, but you can save a lot on heating fuel ressources.
Geothermal energy ?
The romans used to heat their houses with hypocausts :
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypocaust
Using extremely hot water from hot springs could be used instead of fire.
Then you could use alternative ressources for other uses, but you can save a lot on heating fuel ressources.
answered Sep 26 at 11:31
Aël
1
1
1
Hypocaust was not geothermal energy. Somebody had to lit a fire to heat up the floor.
â L.Dutchâ¦
Sep 26 at 11:40
I know, but you could probably make the same system using a hot spring.
â Aël
Sep 26 at 15:44
add a comment |Â
1
Hypocaust was not geothermal energy. Somebody had to lit a fire to heat up the floor.
â L.Dutchâ¦
Sep 26 at 11:40
I know, but you could probably make the same system using a hot spring.
â Aël
Sep 26 at 15:44
1
1
Hypocaust was not geothermal energy. Somebody had to lit a fire to heat up the floor.
â L.Dutchâ¦
Sep 26 at 11:40
Hypocaust was not geothermal energy. Somebody had to lit a fire to heat up the floor.
â L.Dutchâ¦
Sep 26 at 11:40
I know, but you could probably make the same system using a hot spring.
â Aël
Sep 26 at 15:44
I know, but you could probably make the same system using a hot spring.
â Aël
Sep 26 at 15:44
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f125697%2falternative-source-of-fuel-instead-of-wood%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
4
Can they use driftwood on the beach? Do they have large ungulates that leave big plops around?
â user535733
Sep 21 at 19:12
1
This seems like a hard site to make duplicates for, but someone asked something very similar a month or so ago - worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/121075
â HammerN'Songs
Sep 21 at 20:43
1
Without burning wood, they don't make it into a bronze age, sorry. Not going to happen.
â Karl
Sep 21 at 23:44
2
bronze age but do they actually have bronze, that is extremely unlikely on an island. You really need to define what other resources are available, "on an island" is unhelpful.
â John
Sep 23 at 2:46
1
@John It's not really about the bronze, I just wrote that to establish that they are not a modern society and do not have a super advanced technology. And as for defining other resources, I just wanted ideas. It's not like i can't add them copper and tin deposits, or a volcano if I like some of the ideas. I didn't want to restrict the question so much that's why I just said: "on an island".
â Asganius
Sep 24 at 4:14