Pushdown Terminal Output

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
14
down vote

favorite
6












Is there a standard way to reverse the output order of a terminal output, ie:



~/Developer $ command0 
-bash: comman0: command not found
~/Developer $ command2
-bash: command2: command not found
~/Developer $ command3
-bash: command3: command not found
~/Developer $


would be displayed as:



~/Developer $ 
-bash: command3: command not found
~/Developer $ command3
-bash: command2: command not found
~/Developer $ command2
-bash: comman0: command not found
~/Developer $ comman0


I feel always having your prompt at the bottom is counter intuitive a more effective way of presenting the output woud be to reverse the output order. How might I go about implementing this? Specifically where output portion of the OSX terminal program defined?










share|improve this question





















  • This would confuse me, but I applaud your efforts. On of linux/unix/open source major lesssons is that One Size Does Not Fit All.
    – Bruce Ediger
    Apr 3 '12 at 17:18










  • I think this is not possible at all unless you change the source code of the shell (e.g. bash).
    – Renan
    Apr 3 '12 at 17:20






  • 4




    You'd need to hack more than just the shell. Terminals have been scrolling this way since they were electromechanical. At the very least, I'd say you'd need to hack a terminal emulator, maybe also a shell.
    – Alexios
    Apr 3 '12 at 17:31










  • This is actually counter intuitive. Have you noticed the ENTER key arrow? It points to the line below, not above.
    – dresende
    Apr 3 '12 at 18:07










  • Is there a way to grab the items of out put from a terminal, my thought is to create some sort of wrapper which grabs each of these output items, treats each of them similar to how tweets are posted with the newest always apear on top and sticking the input prompt at the top of the Wrapper UI.
    – rudolph9
    Apr 3 '12 at 21:13














up vote
14
down vote

favorite
6












Is there a standard way to reverse the output order of a terminal output, ie:



~/Developer $ command0 
-bash: comman0: command not found
~/Developer $ command2
-bash: command2: command not found
~/Developer $ command3
-bash: command3: command not found
~/Developer $


would be displayed as:



~/Developer $ 
-bash: command3: command not found
~/Developer $ command3
-bash: command2: command not found
~/Developer $ command2
-bash: comman0: command not found
~/Developer $ comman0


I feel always having your prompt at the bottom is counter intuitive a more effective way of presenting the output woud be to reverse the output order. How might I go about implementing this? Specifically where output portion of the OSX terminal program defined?










share|improve this question





















  • This would confuse me, but I applaud your efforts. On of linux/unix/open source major lesssons is that One Size Does Not Fit All.
    – Bruce Ediger
    Apr 3 '12 at 17:18










  • I think this is not possible at all unless you change the source code of the shell (e.g. bash).
    – Renan
    Apr 3 '12 at 17:20






  • 4




    You'd need to hack more than just the shell. Terminals have been scrolling this way since they were electromechanical. At the very least, I'd say you'd need to hack a terminal emulator, maybe also a shell.
    – Alexios
    Apr 3 '12 at 17:31










  • This is actually counter intuitive. Have you noticed the ENTER key arrow? It points to the line below, not above.
    – dresende
    Apr 3 '12 at 18:07










  • Is there a way to grab the items of out put from a terminal, my thought is to create some sort of wrapper which grabs each of these output items, treats each of them similar to how tweets are posted with the newest always apear on top and sticking the input prompt at the top of the Wrapper UI.
    – rudolph9
    Apr 3 '12 at 21:13












up vote
14
down vote

favorite
6









up vote
14
down vote

favorite
6






6





Is there a standard way to reverse the output order of a terminal output, ie:



~/Developer $ command0 
-bash: comman0: command not found
~/Developer $ command2
-bash: command2: command not found
~/Developer $ command3
-bash: command3: command not found
~/Developer $


would be displayed as:



~/Developer $ 
-bash: command3: command not found
~/Developer $ command3
-bash: command2: command not found
~/Developer $ command2
-bash: comman0: command not found
~/Developer $ comman0


I feel always having your prompt at the bottom is counter intuitive a more effective way of presenting the output woud be to reverse the output order. How might I go about implementing this? Specifically where output portion of the OSX terminal program defined?










share|improve this question













Is there a standard way to reverse the output order of a terminal output, ie:



~/Developer $ command0 
-bash: comman0: command not found
~/Developer $ command2
-bash: command2: command not found
~/Developer $ command3
-bash: command3: command not found
~/Developer $


would be displayed as:



~/Developer $ 
-bash: command3: command not found
~/Developer $ command3
-bash: command2: command not found
~/Developer $ command2
-bash: comman0: command not found
~/Developer $ comman0


I feel always having your prompt at the bottom is counter intuitive a more effective way of presenting the output woud be to reverse the output order. How might I go about implementing this? Specifically where output portion of the OSX terminal program defined?







terminal






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Apr 3 '12 at 17:16









rudolph9

6351123




6351123











  • This would confuse me, but I applaud your efforts. On of linux/unix/open source major lesssons is that One Size Does Not Fit All.
    – Bruce Ediger
    Apr 3 '12 at 17:18










  • I think this is not possible at all unless you change the source code of the shell (e.g. bash).
    – Renan
    Apr 3 '12 at 17:20






  • 4




    You'd need to hack more than just the shell. Terminals have been scrolling this way since they were electromechanical. At the very least, I'd say you'd need to hack a terminal emulator, maybe also a shell.
    – Alexios
    Apr 3 '12 at 17:31










  • This is actually counter intuitive. Have you noticed the ENTER key arrow? It points to the line below, not above.
    – dresende
    Apr 3 '12 at 18:07










  • Is there a way to grab the items of out put from a terminal, my thought is to create some sort of wrapper which grabs each of these output items, treats each of them similar to how tweets are posted with the newest always apear on top and sticking the input prompt at the top of the Wrapper UI.
    – rudolph9
    Apr 3 '12 at 21:13
















  • This would confuse me, but I applaud your efforts. On of linux/unix/open source major lesssons is that One Size Does Not Fit All.
    – Bruce Ediger
    Apr 3 '12 at 17:18










  • I think this is not possible at all unless you change the source code of the shell (e.g. bash).
    – Renan
    Apr 3 '12 at 17:20






  • 4




    You'd need to hack more than just the shell. Terminals have been scrolling this way since they were electromechanical. At the very least, I'd say you'd need to hack a terminal emulator, maybe also a shell.
    – Alexios
    Apr 3 '12 at 17:31










  • This is actually counter intuitive. Have you noticed the ENTER key arrow? It points to the line below, not above.
    – dresende
    Apr 3 '12 at 18:07










  • Is there a way to grab the items of out put from a terminal, my thought is to create some sort of wrapper which grabs each of these output items, treats each of them similar to how tweets are posted with the newest always apear on top and sticking the input prompt at the top of the Wrapper UI.
    – rudolph9
    Apr 3 '12 at 21:13















This would confuse me, but I applaud your efforts. On of linux/unix/open source major lesssons is that One Size Does Not Fit All.
– Bruce Ediger
Apr 3 '12 at 17:18




This would confuse me, but I applaud your efforts. On of linux/unix/open source major lesssons is that One Size Does Not Fit All.
– Bruce Ediger
Apr 3 '12 at 17:18












I think this is not possible at all unless you change the source code of the shell (e.g. bash).
– Renan
Apr 3 '12 at 17:20




I think this is not possible at all unless you change the source code of the shell (e.g. bash).
– Renan
Apr 3 '12 at 17:20




4




4




You'd need to hack more than just the shell. Terminals have been scrolling this way since they were electromechanical. At the very least, I'd say you'd need to hack a terminal emulator, maybe also a shell.
– Alexios
Apr 3 '12 at 17:31




You'd need to hack more than just the shell. Terminals have been scrolling this way since they were electromechanical. At the very least, I'd say you'd need to hack a terminal emulator, maybe also a shell.
– Alexios
Apr 3 '12 at 17:31












This is actually counter intuitive. Have you noticed the ENTER key arrow? It points to the line below, not above.
– dresende
Apr 3 '12 at 18:07




This is actually counter intuitive. Have you noticed the ENTER key arrow? It points to the line below, not above.
– dresende
Apr 3 '12 at 18:07












Is there a way to grab the items of out put from a terminal, my thought is to create some sort of wrapper which grabs each of these output items, treats each of them similar to how tweets are posted with the newest always apear on top and sticking the input prompt at the top of the Wrapper UI.
– rudolph9
Apr 3 '12 at 21:13




Is there a way to grab the items of out put from a terminal, my thought is to create some sort of wrapper which grabs each of these output items, treats each of them similar to how tweets are posted with the newest always apear on top and sticking the input prompt at the top of the Wrapper UI.
– rudolph9
Apr 3 '12 at 21:13










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
5
down vote













In bash this will display the current prompt/command at the top, and its output below, but with no scrolling or previous commands:



PROMPT_COMMAND='tput cup 0 0; tput el; tput el1'


This function will put previous commands below, but you have to pipe each and every command to it individually. Unfortunately, exec > >(f) can't help with this as it redirects the whole of bash, not individual commands. Here's the function:



f () xargs expr 1 + 


Then run every command like:



command args |f


It saves the output, creates a number of blank lines equal to length+1, then puts the output back in. You can tag a line on at the end that will display a fake prompt or horizontal rule if you like. E.g.



printf '%*s' $COLUMNS | tr ' ' _;


As a crap but automatic alternative to this whole function thing, we can add a command to the end of our earlier $PROMPT_COMMAND that clears a somewhat arbitrary 11 lines:



PROMPT_COMMAND='tput cup 0 0; tput el; tput el1; tput il 11'


You can also use tput -S to avoid multiple binary calls.




I got the $PROMPT_COMMAND from https://github.com/swirepe/alwaysontop .






share|improve this answer





























    up vote
    5
    down vote













    Unfortunately, this will be fairly difficult. The protocol between the applications and the OS-X terminal is a variant of the VT100 / ANSI terminal control protocol, specifically the XTerm protocol.



    That includes a bunch of assumptions about screen position, etc, that would be challenging to remap to a world where the display was reversed.



    Even worse, all your terminal emulator gets is a string of "put this character at this position" type commands. There is no distinction made between the command prompt and the output of a command run by it, so you can't do one thing for both parts - at least, not without cooperation from the shell underneath.



    The shell, and the programs, assume that the screen proceeds upwards - new data at the bottom, and carries on downward forever.



    You could, at least theoretically, have your terminal emulator modified so that it displayed lines in reverse order - the "bottom" line first, and so on up to the "top" line at the bottom of the screen.



    That would reverse the order of lines in command output, though, so the rest of the content would pop out backwards too. If you wanted the commands (eg: ls, cat) to run "down" but prompts to move "up" life is harder.



    I don't know any software that implements this. (...but see JdeBD's comment to this for a link to one.) :)






    share|improve this answer






















    • I do. (-:
      – JdeBP
      Aug 27 at 19:54

















    up vote
    4
    down vote













    Although this won't exactly reverse output, it will keep your prompt at the top:



    https://github.com/swirepe/alwaysontop



    To use it run:



    git clone https://github.com/swirepe/alwaysontop.git
    cd alwaysontop/
    source alwaysontop.sh


    If you decide you like it just source it in your .bash_profile with something like:



    echo "source ~/alwaysontop/alwaysontop.sh" >> ~/.bash_profile


    Hope that helps!






    share|improve this answer




















    • This is a bit buggy (e.g. with tab-autocomplete and history) but it's a very good demo of what this UI might feel like if it was implemented properly. I think it's valuable for that - to help people know if they'd want it or not!
      – scipilot
      Apr 27 '17 at 4:34










    Your Answer







    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "106"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f35627%2fpushdown-terminal-output%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    5
    down vote













    In bash this will display the current prompt/command at the top, and its output below, but with no scrolling or previous commands:



    PROMPT_COMMAND='tput cup 0 0; tput el; tput el1'


    This function will put previous commands below, but you have to pipe each and every command to it individually. Unfortunately, exec > >(f) can't help with this as it redirects the whole of bash, not individual commands. Here's the function:



    f () xargs expr 1 + 


    Then run every command like:



    command args |f


    It saves the output, creates a number of blank lines equal to length+1, then puts the output back in. You can tag a line on at the end that will display a fake prompt or horizontal rule if you like. E.g.



    printf '%*s' $COLUMNS | tr ' ' _;


    As a crap but automatic alternative to this whole function thing, we can add a command to the end of our earlier $PROMPT_COMMAND that clears a somewhat arbitrary 11 lines:



    PROMPT_COMMAND='tput cup 0 0; tput el; tput el1; tput il 11'


    You can also use tput -S to avoid multiple binary calls.




    I got the $PROMPT_COMMAND from https://github.com/swirepe/alwaysontop .






    share|improve this answer


























      up vote
      5
      down vote













      In bash this will display the current prompt/command at the top, and its output below, but with no scrolling or previous commands:



      PROMPT_COMMAND='tput cup 0 0; tput el; tput el1'


      This function will put previous commands below, but you have to pipe each and every command to it individually. Unfortunately, exec > >(f) can't help with this as it redirects the whole of bash, not individual commands. Here's the function:



      f () xargs expr 1 + 


      Then run every command like:



      command args |f


      It saves the output, creates a number of blank lines equal to length+1, then puts the output back in. You can tag a line on at the end that will display a fake prompt or horizontal rule if you like. E.g.



      printf '%*s' $COLUMNS | tr ' ' _;


      As a crap but automatic alternative to this whole function thing, we can add a command to the end of our earlier $PROMPT_COMMAND that clears a somewhat arbitrary 11 lines:



      PROMPT_COMMAND='tput cup 0 0; tput el; tput el1; tput il 11'


      You can also use tput -S to avoid multiple binary calls.




      I got the $PROMPT_COMMAND from https://github.com/swirepe/alwaysontop .






      share|improve this answer
























        up vote
        5
        down vote










        up vote
        5
        down vote









        In bash this will display the current prompt/command at the top, and its output below, but with no scrolling or previous commands:



        PROMPT_COMMAND='tput cup 0 0; tput el; tput el1'


        This function will put previous commands below, but you have to pipe each and every command to it individually. Unfortunately, exec > >(f) can't help with this as it redirects the whole of bash, not individual commands. Here's the function:



        f () xargs expr 1 + 


        Then run every command like:



        command args |f


        It saves the output, creates a number of blank lines equal to length+1, then puts the output back in. You can tag a line on at the end that will display a fake prompt or horizontal rule if you like. E.g.



        printf '%*s' $COLUMNS | tr ' ' _;


        As a crap but automatic alternative to this whole function thing, we can add a command to the end of our earlier $PROMPT_COMMAND that clears a somewhat arbitrary 11 lines:



        PROMPT_COMMAND='tput cup 0 0; tput el; tput el1; tput il 11'


        You can also use tput -S to avoid multiple binary calls.




        I got the $PROMPT_COMMAND from https://github.com/swirepe/alwaysontop .






        share|improve this answer














        In bash this will display the current prompt/command at the top, and its output below, but with no scrolling or previous commands:



        PROMPT_COMMAND='tput cup 0 0; tput el; tput el1'


        This function will put previous commands below, but you have to pipe each and every command to it individually. Unfortunately, exec > >(f) can't help with this as it redirects the whole of bash, not individual commands. Here's the function:



        f () xargs expr 1 + 


        Then run every command like:



        command args |f


        It saves the output, creates a number of blank lines equal to length+1, then puts the output back in. You can tag a line on at the end that will display a fake prompt or horizontal rule if you like. E.g.



        printf '%*s' $COLUMNS | tr ' ' _;


        As a crap but automatic alternative to this whole function thing, we can add a command to the end of our earlier $PROMPT_COMMAND that clears a somewhat arbitrary 11 lines:



        PROMPT_COMMAND='tput cup 0 0; tput el; tput el1; tput il 11'


        You can also use tput -S to avoid multiple binary calls.




        I got the $PROMPT_COMMAND from https://github.com/swirepe/alwaysontop .







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Oct 14 '13 at 5:15

























        answered Oct 14 '13 at 4:44









        Tommy Jollyboat

        5112




        5112






















            up vote
            5
            down vote













            Unfortunately, this will be fairly difficult. The protocol between the applications and the OS-X terminal is a variant of the VT100 / ANSI terminal control protocol, specifically the XTerm protocol.



            That includes a bunch of assumptions about screen position, etc, that would be challenging to remap to a world where the display was reversed.



            Even worse, all your terminal emulator gets is a string of "put this character at this position" type commands. There is no distinction made between the command prompt and the output of a command run by it, so you can't do one thing for both parts - at least, not without cooperation from the shell underneath.



            The shell, and the programs, assume that the screen proceeds upwards - new data at the bottom, and carries on downward forever.



            You could, at least theoretically, have your terminal emulator modified so that it displayed lines in reverse order - the "bottom" line first, and so on up to the "top" line at the bottom of the screen.



            That would reverse the order of lines in command output, though, so the rest of the content would pop out backwards too. If you wanted the commands (eg: ls, cat) to run "down" but prompts to move "up" life is harder.



            I don't know any software that implements this. (...but see JdeBD's comment to this for a link to one.) :)






            share|improve this answer






















            • I do. (-:
              – JdeBP
              Aug 27 at 19:54














            up vote
            5
            down vote













            Unfortunately, this will be fairly difficult. The protocol between the applications and the OS-X terminal is a variant of the VT100 / ANSI terminal control protocol, specifically the XTerm protocol.



            That includes a bunch of assumptions about screen position, etc, that would be challenging to remap to a world where the display was reversed.



            Even worse, all your terminal emulator gets is a string of "put this character at this position" type commands. There is no distinction made between the command prompt and the output of a command run by it, so you can't do one thing for both parts - at least, not without cooperation from the shell underneath.



            The shell, and the programs, assume that the screen proceeds upwards - new data at the bottom, and carries on downward forever.



            You could, at least theoretically, have your terminal emulator modified so that it displayed lines in reverse order - the "bottom" line first, and so on up to the "top" line at the bottom of the screen.



            That would reverse the order of lines in command output, though, so the rest of the content would pop out backwards too. If you wanted the commands (eg: ls, cat) to run "down" but prompts to move "up" life is harder.



            I don't know any software that implements this. (...but see JdeBD's comment to this for a link to one.) :)






            share|improve this answer






















            • I do. (-:
              – JdeBP
              Aug 27 at 19:54












            up vote
            5
            down vote










            up vote
            5
            down vote









            Unfortunately, this will be fairly difficult. The protocol between the applications and the OS-X terminal is a variant of the VT100 / ANSI terminal control protocol, specifically the XTerm protocol.



            That includes a bunch of assumptions about screen position, etc, that would be challenging to remap to a world where the display was reversed.



            Even worse, all your terminal emulator gets is a string of "put this character at this position" type commands. There is no distinction made between the command prompt and the output of a command run by it, so you can't do one thing for both parts - at least, not without cooperation from the shell underneath.



            The shell, and the programs, assume that the screen proceeds upwards - new data at the bottom, and carries on downward forever.



            You could, at least theoretically, have your terminal emulator modified so that it displayed lines in reverse order - the "bottom" line first, and so on up to the "top" line at the bottom of the screen.



            That would reverse the order of lines in command output, though, so the rest of the content would pop out backwards too. If you wanted the commands (eg: ls, cat) to run "down" but prompts to move "up" life is harder.



            I don't know any software that implements this. (...but see JdeBD's comment to this for a link to one.) :)






            share|improve this answer














            Unfortunately, this will be fairly difficult. The protocol between the applications and the OS-X terminal is a variant of the VT100 / ANSI terminal control protocol, specifically the XTerm protocol.



            That includes a bunch of assumptions about screen position, etc, that would be challenging to remap to a world where the display was reversed.



            Even worse, all your terminal emulator gets is a string of "put this character at this position" type commands. There is no distinction made between the command prompt and the output of a command run by it, so you can't do one thing for both parts - at least, not without cooperation from the shell underneath.



            The shell, and the programs, assume that the screen proceeds upwards - new data at the bottom, and carries on downward forever.



            You could, at least theoretically, have your terminal emulator modified so that it displayed lines in reverse order - the "bottom" line first, and so on up to the "top" line at the bottom of the screen.



            That would reverse the order of lines in command output, though, so the rest of the content would pop out backwards too. If you wanted the commands (eg: ls, cat) to run "down" but prompts to move "up" life is harder.



            I don't know any software that implements this. (...but see JdeBD's comment to this for a link to one.) :)







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited Aug 31 at 17:12

























            answered Apr 3 '12 at 17:28









            Daniel Pittman

            5,17012116




            5,17012116











            • I do. (-:
              – JdeBP
              Aug 27 at 19:54
















            • I do. (-:
              – JdeBP
              Aug 27 at 19:54















            I do. (-:
            – JdeBP
            Aug 27 at 19:54




            I do. (-:
            – JdeBP
            Aug 27 at 19:54










            up vote
            4
            down vote













            Although this won't exactly reverse output, it will keep your prompt at the top:



            https://github.com/swirepe/alwaysontop



            To use it run:



            git clone https://github.com/swirepe/alwaysontop.git
            cd alwaysontop/
            source alwaysontop.sh


            If you decide you like it just source it in your .bash_profile with something like:



            echo "source ~/alwaysontop/alwaysontop.sh" >> ~/.bash_profile


            Hope that helps!






            share|improve this answer




















            • This is a bit buggy (e.g. with tab-autocomplete and history) but it's a very good demo of what this UI might feel like if it was implemented properly. I think it's valuable for that - to help people know if they'd want it or not!
              – scipilot
              Apr 27 '17 at 4:34














            up vote
            4
            down vote













            Although this won't exactly reverse output, it will keep your prompt at the top:



            https://github.com/swirepe/alwaysontop



            To use it run:



            git clone https://github.com/swirepe/alwaysontop.git
            cd alwaysontop/
            source alwaysontop.sh


            If you decide you like it just source it in your .bash_profile with something like:



            echo "source ~/alwaysontop/alwaysontop.sh" >> ~/.bash_profile


            Hope that helps!






            share|improve this answer




















            • This is a bit buggy (e.g. with tab-autocomplete and history) but it's a very good demo of what this UI might feel like if it was implemented properly. I think it's valuable for that - to help people know if they'd want it or not!
              – scipilot
              Apr 27 '17 at 4:34












            up vote
            4
            down vote










            up vote
            4
            down vote









            Although this won't exactly reverse output, it will keep your prompt at the top:



            https://github.com/swirepe/alwaysontop



            To use it run:



            git clone https://github.com/swirepe/alwaysontop.git
            cd alwaysontop/
            source alwaysontop.sh


            If you decide you like it just source it in your .bash_profile with something like:



            echo "source ~/alwaysontop/alwaysontop.sh" >> ~/.bash_profile


            Hope that helps!






            share|improve this answer












            Although this won't exactly reverse output, it will keep your prompt at the top:



            https://github.com/swirepe/alwaysontop



            To use it run:



            git clone https://github.com/swirepe/alwaysontop.git
            cd alwaysontop/
            source alwaysontop.sh


            If you decide you like it just source it in your .bash_profile with something like:



            echo "source ~/alwaysontop/alwaysontop.sh" >> ~/.bash_profile


            Hope that helps!







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered Oct 10 '14 at 23:05









            ryanpcmcquen

            1515




            1515











            • This is a bit buggy (e.g. with tab-autocomplete and history) but it's a very good demo of what this UI might feel like if it was implemented properly. I think it's valuable for that - to help people know if they'd want it or not!
              – scipilot
              Apr 27 '17 at 4:34
















            • This is a bit buggy (e.g. with tab-autocomplete and history) but it's a very good demo of what this UI might feel like if it was implemented properly. I think it's valuable for that - to help people know if they'd want it or not!
              – scipilot
              Apr 27 '17 at 4:34















            This is a bit buggy (e.g. with tab-autocomplete and history) but it's a very good demo of what this UI might feel like if it was implemented properly. I think it's valuable for that - to help people know if they'd want it or not!
            – scipilot
            Apr 27 '17 at 4:34




            This is a bit buggy (e.g. with tab-autocomplete and history) but it's a very good demo of what this UI might feel like if it was implemented properly. I think it's valuable for that - to help people know if they'd want it or not!
            – scipilot
            Apr 27 '17 at 4:34

















             

            draft saved


            draft discarded















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f35627%2fpushdown-terminal-output%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest













































































            Popular posts from this blog

            How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

            Displaying single band from multi-band raster using QGIS

            How many registers does an x86_64 CPU actually have?