Multiple network shares to single mount point?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
How would I mount multiple network shares to single mount point?
Example
//10.50.154.6/data 42T 22T 21T 51% /mnt/data6
//10.50.154.7/data 8.1T 6.2T 1.9T 77% /mnt/data7
//10.50.154.8/data 33T 29T 4.6T 87% /mnt/data8
etc
These would be mounted or bound together:/mnt/data6, /mnt/data7, /mnt/data8 etc.. to /mnt/dataALL.
There are no directories with same name in network shares, but subdirs have identical names. So, I think there should be no conflicting over names.
What is the best practice for this kind of unified or layered configuration?
centos filesystems mount partition bind-mount
edited Jul 14 at 2:23
user2066657
379110
asked Jul 12 at 15:07
Resolved
61
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
How would I mount multiple network shares to single mount point?
Example
//10.50.154.6/data 42T 22T 21T 51% /mnt/data6
//10.50.154.7/data 8.1T 6.2T 1.9T 77% /mnt/data7
//10.50.154.8/data 33T 29T 4.6T 87% /mnt/data8
etc
These would be mounted or bound together:/mnt/data6, /mnt/data7, /mnt/data8 etc.. to /mnt/dataALL.
There are no directories with same name in network shares, but subdirs have identical names. So, I think there should be no conflicting over names.
What is the best practice for this kind of unified or layered configuration?
centos filesystems mount partition bind-mount
edited Jul 14 at 2:23
user2066657
379110
asked Jul 12 at 15:07
Resolved
61
2
Have a look at UnionFS.
– dirkt
Jul 12 at 15:12
The example shows different mount-points:/mnt/data6,/mnt/data7and/mnt/data8.
– ctrl-alt-delor
Jul 13 at 6:25
Thank you! After some time on google checking unionfs, and some other similar options. unionfs-fuse works great for ubuntu 16.04 and centos 6.1
– Resolved
Jul 13 at 17:37
@dirkt, you should rewrite your answer as an answer.
– user2066657
Jul 14 at 0:23
@user2066657: I think that standards for an answer here would demand I explain how to use UnionsFS etc., and I was too lazy for that. If you (or the asker) would like to write a more detailed answer, please do so.
– dirkt
Jul 14 at 7:36
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
How would I mount multiple network shares to single mount point?
Example
//10.50.154.6/data 42T 22T 21T 51% /mnt/data6
//10.50.154.7/data 8.1T 6.2T 1.9T 77% /mnt/data7
//10.50.154.8/data 33T 29T 4.6T 87% /mnt/data8
etc
These would be mounted or bound together:/mnt/data6, /mnt/data7, /mnt/data8 etc.. to /mnt/dataALL.
There are no directories with same name in network shares, but subdirs have identical names. So, I think there should be no conflicting over names.
What is the best practice for this kind of unified or layered configuration?
centos filesystems mount partition bind-mount
edited Jul 14 at 2:23
user2066657
379110
asked Jul 12 at 15:07
Resolved
61
How would I mount multiple network shares to single mount point?
Example
//10.50.154.6/data 42T 22T 21T 51% /mnt/data6
//10.50.154.7/data 8.1T 6.2T 1.9T 77% /mnt/data7
//10.50.154.8/data 33T 29T 4.6T 87% /mnt/data8
etc
These would be mounted or bound together:/mnt/data6, /mnt/data7, /mnt/data8 etc.. to /mnt/dataALL.
There are no directories with same name in network shares, but subdirs have identical names. So, I think there should be no conflicting over names.
What is the best practice for this kind of unified or layered configuration?
centos filesystems mount partition bind-mount
edited Jul 14 at 2:23
user2066657
379110
asked Jul 12 at 15:07
Resolved
61
edited Jul 14 at 2:23
user2066657
379110
edited Jul 14 at 2:23
user2066657
379110
edited Jul 14 at 2:23
user2066657
379110
379110
asked Jul 12 at 15:07
Resolved
61
asked Jul 12 at 15:07
Resolved
61
asked Jul 12 at 15:07
Resolved
61
61
2
Have a look at UnionFS.
– dirkt
Jul 12 at 15:12
The example shows different mount-points:/mnt/data6,/mnt/data7and/mnt/data8.
– ctrl-alt-delor
Jul 13 at 6:25
Thank you! After some time on google checking unionfs, and some other similar options. unionfs-fuse works great for ubuntu 16.04 and centos 6.1
– Resolved
Jul 13 at 17:37
@dirkt, you should rewrite your answer as an answer.
– user2066657
Jul 14 at 0:23
@user2066657: I think that standards for an answer here would demand I explain how to use UnionsFS etc., and I was too lazy for that. If you (or the asker) would like to write a more detailed answer, please do so.
– dirkt
Jul 14 at 7:36
add a comment |Â
2
Have a look at UnionFS.
– dirkt
Jul 12 at 15:12
The example shows different mount-points:/mnt/data6,/mnt/data7and/mnt/data8.
– ctrl-alt-delor
Jul 13 at 6:25
Thank you! After some time on google checking unionfs, and some other similar options. unionfs-fuse works great for ubuntu 16.04 and centos 6.1
– Resolved
Jul 13 at 17:37
@dirkt, you should rewrite your answer as an answer.
– user2066657
Jul 14 at 0:23
@user2066657: I think that standards for an answer here would demand I explain how to use UnionsFS etc., and I was too lazy for that. If you (or the asker) would like to write a more detailed answer, please do so.
– dirkt
Jul 14 at 7:36
2
2
Have a look at UnionFS.
– dirkt
Jul 12 at 15:12
Have a look at UnionFS.
– dirkt
Jul 12 at 15:12
The example shows different mount-points:
/mnt/data6, /mnt/data7 and /mnt/data8.– ctrl-alt-delor
Jul 13 at 6:25
The example shows different mount-points:
/mnt/data6, /mnt/data7 and /mnt/data8.– ctrl-alt-delor
Jul 13 at 6:25
Thank you! After some time on google checking unionfs, and some other similar options. unionfs-fuse works great for ubuntu 16.04 and centos 6.1
– Resolved
Jul 13 at 17:37
Thank you! After some time on google checking unionfs, and some other similar options. unionfs-fuse works great for ubuntu 16.04 and centos 6.1
– Resolved
Jul 13 at 17:37
@dirkt, you should rewrite your answer as an answer.
– user2066657
Jul 14 at 0:23
@dirkt, you should rewrite your answer as an answer.
– user2066657
Jul 14 at 0:23
@user2066657: I think that standards for an answer here would demand I explain how to use UnionsFS etc., and I was too lazy for that. If you (or the asker) would like to write a more detailed answer, please do so.
– dirkt
Jul 14 at 7:36
@user2066657: I think that standards for an answer here would demand I explain how to use UnionsFS etc., and I was too lazy for that. If you (or the asker) would like to write a more detailed answer, please do so.
– dirkt
Jul 14 at 7:36
add a comment |Â
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f454926%2fmultiple-network-shares-to-single-mount-point%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
2
Have a look at UnionFS.
– dirkt
Jul 12 at 15:12
The example shows different mount-points:
/mnt/data6,/mnt/data7and/mnt/data8.– ctrl-alt-delor
Jul 13 at 6:25
Thank you! After some time on google checking unionfs, and some other similar options. unionfs-fuse works great for ubuntu 16.04 and centos 6.1
– Resolved
Jul 13 at 17:37
@dirkt, you should rewrite your answer as an answer.
– user2066657
Jul 14 at 0:23
@user2066657: I think that standards for an answer here would demand I explain how to use UnionsFS etc., and I was too lazy for that. If you (or the asker) would like to write a more detailed answer, please do so.
– dirkt
Jul 14 at 7:36