Where is the idiomatic place to put source code for my projects? [closed]

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I'm a software developer and only in the last year or so have I been using Linux Mint over Windows as my working dev environment. For the last year I figured I'd do things my way and adapt as I learn the proper way to do things. So far so good. Relevant to this question, I've been putting my source code to my work and personal projects in a folder I created in my home directory: ~/src



In the last week I updated to Mint 19 and Timeshift is a front and center feature in it. I've set up my backups but noticed that my encrypted home directory is marked as an exclusion from my backups. I do use remote git repos to store my source but I would also feel a lot better if my Timeshift backups had my code as well. I could add an inclusive filter to Timeshift but I think it's time I look into where my source SHOULD be stored. A little research produced the very helpful Filesystem Hierarchy Standard (pdf) and it brought /usr/local/src to my attention but doesn't go into detail about it.



I know this question seems a little subjective but Linux has always seemed to be a developer friendly OS which makes me believe there's an idiomatic place to keep my personal source code separate from source I download/make/install.



Where does Linux intend I place my source? Or should I just add an inclusive filter to Timeshift to backup ~/src?







share|improve this question











closed as primarily opinion-based by Thomas Dickey, Rui F Ribeiro, schily, Jeff Schaller, Romeo Ninov Jul 11 at 4:04


Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.














  • Is your backup, backing up the backing store for the encrypted file-system (that is the encrypted version).
    – ctrl-alt-delor
    Jul 10 at 17:23










  • I am a fan of /opt for my source code...
    – jc__
    Jul 10 at 17:25










  • @ctrl-alt-delor Timeshift by default will not backup any home directories, encrypted or otherwise. The latest version when you tell it to backup your home directory will back up the .ecryptfs directory for your user. So I am now backing up the encrypted version of my home directory including my src.
    – Corey Ogburn
    Jul 10 at 18:00














up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I'm a software developer and only in the last year or so have I been using Linux Mint over Windows as my working dev environment. For the last year I figured I'd do things my way and adapt as I learn the proper way to do things. So far so good. Relevant to this question, I've been putting my source code to my work and personal projects in a folder I created in my home directory: ~/src



In the last week I updated to Mint 19 and Timeshift is a front and center feature in it. I've set up my backups but noticed that my encrypted home directory is marked as an exclusion from my backups. I do use remote git repos to store my source but I would also feel a lot better if my Timeshift backups had my code as well. I could add an inclusive filter to Timeshift but I think it's time I look into where my source SHOULD be stored. A little research produced the very helpful Filesystem Hierarchy Standard (pdf) and it brought /usr/local/src to my attention but doesn't go into detail about it.



I know this question seems a little subjective but Linux has always seemed to be a developer friendly OS which makes me believe there's an idiomatic place to keep my personal source code separate from source I download/make/install.



Where does Linux intend I place my source? Or should I just add an inclusive filter to Timeshift to backup ~/src?







share|improve this question











closed as primarily opinion-based by Thomas Dickey, Rui F Ribeiro, schily, Jeff Schaller, Romeo Ninov Jul 11 at 4:04


Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.














  • Is your backup, backing up the backing store for the encrypted file-system (that is the encrypted version).
    – ctrl-alt-delor
    Jul 10 at 17:23










  • I am a fan of /opt for my source code...
    – jc__
    Jul 10 at 17:25










  • @ctrl-alt-delor Timeshift by default will not backup any home directories, encrypted or otherwise. The latest version when you tell it to backup your home directory will back up the .ecryptfs directory for your user. So I am now backing up the encrypted version of my home directory including my src.
    – Corey Ogburn
    Jul 10 at 18:00












up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











I'm a software developer and only in the last year or so have I been using Linux Mint over Windows as my working dev environment. For the last year I figured I'd do things my way and adapt as I learn the proper way to do things. So far so good. Relevant to this question, I've been putting my source code to my work and personal projects in a folder I created in my home directory: ~/src



In the last week I updated to Mint 19 and Timeshift is a front and center feature in it. I've set up my backups but noticed that my encrypted home directory is marked as an exclusion from my backups. I do use remote git repos to store my source but I would also feel a lot better if my Timeshift backups had my code as well. I could add an inclusive filter to Timeshift but I think it's time I look into where my source SHOULD be stored. A little research produced the very helpful Filesystem Hierarchy Standard (pdf) and it brought /usr/local/src to my attention but doesn't go into detail about it.



I know this question seems a little subjective but Linux has always seemed to be a developer friendly OS which makes me believe there's an idiomatic place to keep my personal source code separate from source I download/make/install.



Where does Linux intend I place my source? Or should I just add an inclusive filter to Timeshift to backup ~/src?







share|improve this question











I'm a software developer and only in the last year or so have I been using Linux Mint over Windows as my working dev environment. For the last year I figured I'd do things my way and adapt as I learn the proper way to do things. So far so good. Relevant to this question, I've been putting my source code to my work and personal projects in a folder I created in my home directory: ~/src



In the last week I updated to Mint 19 and Timeshift is a front and center feature in it. I've set up my backups but noticed that my encrypted home directory is marked as an exclusion from my backups. I do use remote git repos to store my source but I would also feel a lot better if my Timeshift backups had my code as well. I could add an inclusive filter to Timeshift but I think it's time I look into where my source SHOULD be stored. A little research produced the very helpful Filesystem Hierarchy Standard (pdf) and it brought /usr/local/src to my attention but doesn't go into detail about it.



I know this question seems a little subjective but Linux has always seemed to be a developer friendly OS which makes me believe there's an idiomatic place to keep my personal source code separate from source I download/make/install.



Where does Linux intend I place my source? Or should I just add an inclusive filter to Timeshift to backup ~/src?









share|improve this question










share|improve this question




share|improve this question









asked Jul 10 at 16:45









Corey Ogburn

152110




152110




closed as primarily opinion-based by Thomas Dickey, Rui F Ribeiro, schily, Jeff Schaller, Romeo Ninov Jul 11 at 4:04


Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.






closed as primarily opinion-based by Thomas Dickey, Rui F Ribeiro, schily, Jeff Schaller, Romeo Ninov Jul 11 at 4:04


Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.













  • Is your backup, backing up the backing store for the encrypted file-system (that is the encrypted version).
    – ctrl-alt-delor
    Jul 10 at 17:23










  • I am a fan of /opt for my source code...
    – jc__
    Jul 10 at 17:25










  • @ctrl-alt-delor Timeshift by default will not backup any home directories, encrypted or otherwise. The latest version when you tell it to backup your home directory will back up the .ecryptfs directory for your user. So I am now backing up the encrypted version of my home directory including my src.
    – Corey Ogburn
    Jul 10 at 18:00
















  • Is your backup, backing up the backing store for the encrypted file-system (that is the encrypted version).
    – ctrl-alt-delor
    Jul 10 at 17:23










  • I am a fan of /opt for my source code...
    – jc__
    Jul 10 at 17:25










  • @ctrl-alt-delor Timeshift by default will not backup any home directories, encrypted or otherwise. The latest version when you tell it to backup your home directory will back up the .ecryptfs directory for your user. So I am now backing up the encrypted version of my home directory including my src.
    – Corey Ogburn
    Jul 10 at 18:00















Is your backup, backing up the backing store for the encrypted file-system (that is the encrypted version).
– ctrl-alt-delor
Jul 10 at 17:23




Is your backup, backing up the backing store for the encrypted file-system (that is the encrypted version).
– ctrl-alt-delor
Jul 10 at 17:23












I am a fan of /opt for my source code...
– jc__
Jul 10 at 17:25




I am a fan of /opt for my source code...
– jc__
Jul 10 at 17:25












@ctrl-alt-delor Timeshift by default will not backup any home directories, encrypted or otherwise. The latest version when you tell it to backup your home directory will back up the .ecryptfs directory for your user. So I am now backing up the encrypted version of my home directory including my src.
– Corey Ogburn
Jul 10 at 18:00




@ctrl-alt-delor Timeshift by default will not backup any home directories, encrypted or otherwise. The latest version when you tell it to backup your home directory will back up the .ecryptfs directory for your user. So I am now backing up the encrypted version of my home directory including my src.
– Corey Ogburn
Jul 10 at 18:00










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote



accepted










/usr/local/src is the local equivalent of /usr/src, which the FHS describes as




Source code may be place placed in this subdirectory, only for reference purposes.




Neither /usr/src or /usr/local/src are intended as working directories, especially not for a specific user. All your data is supposed to live under your home directory, and the FHS doesn’t have much to say about what you do there.



I think the appropriate solution in your case is to configure Timeshift so that it backs your source code up.






share|improve this answer




























    up vote
    1
    down vote













    First it is normal for everything to go in your home folder ~/ = $HOME usually equal to /home/$USER. If you install 3rd party stuff, it goes in /usr/local or /opt (depending on structure of the stuff).



    The main difference between the layout of a Unix users home directory, and a MS-Windows users, is:



    Traditionally on Windows/dos, one would put all of the .doc files in one place, and all of the excel files in another, and all the PDFs somewhere else etc.



    Where as on Unix you will put all of project-1's files in one directory, and all of project-2's files in another. You may create a sub-directory to put auto-created files (compiled files).






    share|improve this answer




























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes








      up vote
      2
      down vote



      accepted










      /usr/local/src is the local equivalent of /usr/src, which the FHS describes as




      Source code may be place placed in this subdirectory, only for reference purposes.




      Neither /usr/src or /usr/local/src are intended as working directories, especially not for a specific user. All your data is supposed to live under your home directory, and the FHS doesn’t have much to say about what you do there.



      I think the appropriate solution in your case is to configure Timeshift so that it backs your source code up.






      share|improve this answer

























        up vote
        2
        down vote



        accepted










        /usr/local/src is the local equivalent of /usr/src, which the FHS describes as




        Source code may be place placed in this subdirectory, only for reference purposes.




        Neither /usr/src or /usr/local/src are intended as working directories, especially not for a specific user. All your data is supposed to live under your home directory, and the FHS doesn’t have much to say about what you do there.



        I think the appropriate solution in your case is to configure Timeshift so that it backs your source code up.






        share|improve this answer























          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted






          /usr/local/src is the local equivalent of /usr/src, which the FHS describes as




          Source code may be place placed in this subdirectory, only for reference purposes.




          Neither /usr/src or /usr/local/src are intended as working directories, especially not for a specific user. All your data is supposed to live under your home directory, and the FHS doesn’t have much to say about what you do there.



          I think the appropriate solution in your case is to configure Timeshift so that it backs your source code up.






          share|improve this answer













          /usr/local/src is the local equivalent of /usr/src, which the FHS describes as




          Source code may be place placed in this subdirectory, only for reference purposes.




          Neither /usr/src or /usr/local/src are intended as working directories, especially not for a specific user. All your data is supposed to live under your home directory, and the FHS doesn’t have much to say about what you do there.



          I think the appropriate solution in your case is to configure Timeshift so that it backs your source code up.







          share|improve this answer













          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer











          answered Jul 10 at 16:49









          Stephen Kitt

          139k22296359




          139k22296359






















              up vote
              1
              down vote













              First it is normal for everything to go in your home folder ~/ = $HOME usually equal to /home/$USER. If you install 3rd party stuff, it goes in /usr/local or /opt (depending on structure of the stuff).



              The main difference between the layout of a Unix users home directory, and a MS-Windows users, is:



              Traditionally on Windows/dos, one would put all of the .doc files in one place, and all of the excel files in another, and all the PDFs somewhere else etc.



              Where as on Unix you will put all of project-1's files in one directory, and all of project-2's files in another. You may create a sub-directory to put auto-created files (compiled files).






              share|improve this answer

























                up vote
                1
                down vote













                First it is normal for everything to go in your home folder ~/ = $HOME usually equal to /home/$USER. If you install 3rd party stuff, it goes in /usr/local or /opt (depending on structure of the stuff).



                The main difference between the layout of a Unix users home directory, and a MS-Windows users, is:



                Traditionally on Windows/dos, one would put all of the .doc files in one place, and all of the excel files in another, and all the PDFs somewhere else etc.



                Where as on Unix you will put all of project-1's files in one directory, and all of project-2's files in another. You may create a sub-directory to put auto-created files (compiled files).






                share|improve this answer























                  up vote
                  1
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  1
                  down vote









                  First it is normal for everything to go in your home folder ~/ = $HOME usually equal to /home/$USER. If you install 3rd party stuff, it goes in /usr/local or /opt (depending on structure of the stuff).



                  The main difference between the layout of a Unix users home directory, and a MS-Windows users, is:



                  Traditionally on Windows/dos, one would put all of the .doc files in one place, and all of the excel files in another, and all the PDFs somewhere else etc.



                  Where as on Unix you will put all of project-1's files in one directory, and all of project-2's files in another. You may create a sub-directory to put auto-created files (compiled files).






                  share|improve this answer













                  First it is normal for everything to go in your home folder ~/ = $HOME usually equal to /home/$USER. If you install 3rd party stuff, it goes in /usr/local or /opt (depending on structure of the stuff).



                  The main difference between the layout of a Unix users home directory, and a MS-Windows users, is:



                  Traditionally on Windows/dos, one would put all of the .doc files in one place, and all of the excel files in another, and all the PDFs somewhere else etc.



                  Where as on Unix you will put all of project-1's files in one directory, and all of project-2's files in another. You may create a sub-directory to put auto-created files (compiled files).







                  share|improve this answer













                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer











                  answered Jul 10 at 17:22









                  ctrl-alt-delor

                  8,64331946




                  8,64331946












                      Popular posts from this blog

                      How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

                      Bahrain

                      Postfix configuration issue with fips on centos 7; mailgun relay