Filter out items that belong to the Source Packages
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
0
Here I have a Manifest of Ubuntu
I would like to list out only the Source Packages and not the containing items.
binutils 2.31.1-6ubuntu1
binutils-common:amd64 2.31.1-6ubuntu1
binutils-x86-64-linux-gnu 2.31.1-6ubuntu1
The result I would like to see:
binutils 2.31.1-6ubuntu1
Additionally, short information about each source package would be as well a nice thing.
binutils 2.31.1-6ubuntu1 The GNU Binutils are a collection of binary tools.
What are the most simple ways to achieve this using Bash, GNU Coreutils anything else?
ubuntu package-management coreutils
asked Mar 12 at 11:12
user3789797user3789797
12
|
show 1 more comment
0
Here I have a Manifest of Ubuntu
I would like to list out only the Source Packages and not the containing items.
binutils 2.31.1-6ubuntu1
binutils-common:amd64 2.31.1-6ubuntu1
binutils-x86-64-linux-gnu 2.31.1-6ubuntu1
The result I would like to see:
binutils 2.31.1-6ubuntu1
Additionally, short information about each source package would be as well a nice thing.
binutils 2.31.1-6ubuntu1 The GNU Binutils are a collection of binary tools.
What are the most simple ways to achieve this using Bash, GNU Coreutils anything else?
ubuntu package-management coreutils
asked Mar 12 at 11:12
user3789797user3789797
12
3
I don't have an Ubuntu system at-hand, but aren't those individual, separate (if related) packages?
– Jeff Schaller♦
Mar 12 at 11:17
2
These are not containing items. These are packages. Actually in Ubuntu, a package depends on multiple other packages. So, they are separate package on which binutils depends. These packages are separated since they may satisfy dependency of some other packages too.
– Kulfy
Mar 12 at 11:19
Hmm, it could be that I'm wrong, look at the manifest I linked. But they all belong to the same binutils, as they start with binutils-*. I kind of need help to rephrase my question. If they are seperate packages, but related to one another, then how should I call them?
– user3789797
Mar 12 at 11:20
The term you’re looking for is probably “source package”. The three listedbinutilspackages all come from thebinutilssource package.
– Stephen Kitt
Mar 12 at 12:23
That is probably it, official definition of the Source Package: wiki.debian.org/Packaging/SourcePackage
– user3789797
Mar 12 at 13:29
|
show 1 more comment
0
0
0
1
Here I have a Manifest of Ubuntu
I would like to list out only the Source Packages and not the containing items.
binutils 2.31.1-6ubuntu1
binutils-common:amd64 2.31.1-6ubuntu1
binutils-x86-64-linux-gnu 2.31.1-6ubuntu1
The result I would like to see:
binutils 2.31.1-6ubuntu1
Additionally, short information about each source package would be as well a nice thing.
binutils 2.31.1-6ubuntu1 The GNU Binutils are a collection of binary tools.
What are the most simple ways to achieve this using Bash, GNU Coreutils anything else?
ubuntu package-management coreutils
asked Mar 12 at 11:12
user3789797user3789797
12
Here I have a Manifest of Ubuntu
I would like to list out only the Source Packages and not the containing items.
binutils 2.31.1-6ubuntu1
binutils-common:amd64 2.31.1-6ubuntu1
binutils-x86-64-linux-gnu 2.31.1-6ubuntu1
The result I would like to see:
binutils 2.31.1-6ubuntu1
Additionally, short information about each source package would be as well a nice thing.
binutils 2.31.1-6ubuntu1 The GNU Binutils are a collection of binary tools.
What are the most simple ways to achieve this using Bash, GNU Coreutils anything else?
ubuntu package-management coreutils
ubuntu package-management coreutils
asked Mar 12 at 11:12
user3789797user3789797
12
asked Mar 12 at 11:12
user3789797user3789797
12
edited Mar 12 at 13:25
user3789797
asked Mar 12 at 11:12
user3789797user3789797
12
asked Mar 12 at 11:12
user3789797user3789797
12
asked Mar 12 at 11:12
user3789797user3789797
12
12
3
I don't have an Ubuntu system at-hand, but aren't those individual, separate (if related) packages?
– Jeff Schaller♦
Mar 12 at 11:17
2
These are not containing items. These are packages. Actually in Ubuntu, a package depends on multiple other packages. So, they are separate package on which binutils depends. These packages are separated since they may satisfy dependency of some other packages too.
– Kulfy
Mar 12 at 11:19
Hmm, it could be that I'm wrong, look at the manifest I linked. But they all belong to the same binutils, as they start with binutils-*. I kind of need help to rephrase my question. If they are seperate packages, but related to one another, then how should I call them?
– user3789797
Mar 12 at 11:20
The term you’re looking for is probably “source package”. The three listedbinutilspackages all come from thebinutilssource package.
– Stephen Kitt
Mar 12 at 12:23
That is probably it, official definition of the Source Package: wiki.debian.org/Packaging/SourcePackage
– user3789797
Mar 12 at 13:29
|
show 1 more comment
3
I don't have an Ubuntu system at-hand, but aren't those individual, separate (if related) packages?
– Jeff Schaller♦
Mar 12 at 11:17
2
These are not containing items. These are packages. Actually in Ubuntu, a package depends on multiple other packages. So, they are separate package on which binutils depends. These packages are separated since they may satisfy dependency of some other packages too.
– Kulfy
Mar 12 at 11:19
Hmm, it could be that I'm wrong, look at the manifest I linked. But they all belong to the same binutils, as they start with binutils-*. I kind of need help to rephrase my question. If they are seperate packages, but related to one another, then how should I call them?
– user3789797
Mar 12 at 11:20
The term you’re looking for is probably “source package”. The three listedbinutilspackages all come from thebinutilssource package.
– Stephen Kitt
Mar 12 at 12:23
That is probably it, official definition of the Source Package: wiki.debian.org/Packaging/SourcePackage
– user3789797
Mar 12 at 13:29
3
3
I don't have an Ubuntu system at-hand, but aren't those individual, separate (if related) packages?
– Jeff Schaller♦
Mar 12 at 11:17
I don't have an Ubuntu system at-hand, but aren't those individual, separate (if related) packages?
– Jeff Schaller♦
Mar 12 at 11:17
2
2
These are not containing items. These are packages. Actually in Ubuntu, a package depends on multiple other packages. So, they are separate package on which binutils depends. These packages are separated since they may satisfy dependency of some other packages too.
– Kulfy
Mar 12 at 11:19
These are not containing items. These are packages. Actually in Ubuntu, a package depends on multiple other packages. So, they are separate package on which binutils depends. These packages are separated since they may satisfy dependency of some other packages too.
– Kulfy
Mar 12 at 11:19
Hmm, it could be that I'm wrong, look at the manifest I linked. But they all belong to the same binutils, as they start with binutils-*. I kind of need help to rephrase my question. If they are seperate packages, but related to one another, then how should I call them?
– user3789797
Mar 12 at 11:20
Hmm, it could be that I'm wrong, look at the manifest I linked. But they all belong to the same binutils, as they start with binutils-*. I kind of need help to rephrase my question. If they are seperate packages, but related to one another, then how should I call them?
– user3789797
Mar 12 at 11:20
The term you’re looking for is probably “source package”. The three listed
binutils packages all come from the binutils source package.– Stephen Kitt
Mar 12 at 12:23
The term you’re looking for is probably “source package”. The three listed
binutils packages all come from the binutils source package.– Stephen Kitt
Mar 12 at 12:23
That is probably it, official definition of the Source Package: wiki.debian.org/Packaging/SourcePackage
– user3789797
Mar 12 at 13:29
That is probably it, official definition of the Source Package: wiki.debian.org/Packaging/SourcePackage
– user3789797
Mar 12 at 13:29
|
show 1 more comment
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f505850%2ffilter-out-items-that-belong-to-the-source-packages%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
draft saved
draft discarded
Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f505850%2ffilter-out-items-that-belong-to-the-source-packages%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
I don't have an Ubuntu system at-hand, but aren't those individual, separate (if related) packages?
– Jeff Schaller♦
Mar 12 at 11:17
2
These are not containing items. These are packages. Actually in Ubuntu, a package depends on multiple other packages. So, they are separate package on which binutils depends. These packages are separated since they may satisfy dependency of some other packages too.
– Kulfy
Mar 12 at 11:19
Hmm, it could be that I'm wrong, look at the manifest I linked. But they all belong to the same binutils, as they start with binutils-*. I kind of need help to rephrase my question. If they are seperate packages, but related to one another, then how should I call them?
– user3789797
Mar 12 at 11:20
The term you’re looking for is probably “source package”. The three listed
binutilspackages all come from thebinutilssource package.– Stephen Kitt
Mar 12 at 12:23
That is probably it, official definition of the Source Package: wiki.debian.org/Packaging/SourcePackage
– user3789797
Mar 12 at 13:29