Who is eating data? Xargs?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








2















I am trying to parse a recursive directory of PHP files using the built in PHP linter, which works like this:



$ php -l good.php
No syntax errors detected in good.php

$ php -l bad.php
PHP Parse error: syntax error, unexpected ''foo'' (T_CONSTANT_ENCAPSED_STRING), expecting ')' in bad.php on line 3
Errors parsing bad.php


We can see that files which pass linting output a line containing No syntax errors and those which fail linting output a line containing Errors parsing.



I see that I have 12147 PHP files recursively in the current directory, however the PHP linter is only outputting seven lines:



$ find . -name *.php -print0 | xargs -0 ls -l | wc -l
12147

$ find . -name *.php -print0 | xargs -0 php -l | wc -l
7


As there were only 7 files parsed by PHP, I can use my head with ls to find some files which have not been parsed:



$ find . -name *.php -print0 | xargs -0 ls -l | head
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 1927 Jan 13 10:13 ./bootstrap/app.php
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 1076 Jan 13 10:13 ./bootstrap/autoload.php
-rw-rw-r-- 1 dotan dotan 25620 Mar 12 12:29 ./bootstrap/cache/services.php
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 2493 Jan 13 10:13 ./bootstrap/paths.php
-rwxrwxr-x 1 dotan dotan 20008 Mar 12 12:30 ./config/app.php
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 3304 Jan 13 10:13 ./config/auth.php
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 1819 Jan 13 10:13 ./config/cache.php
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 3751 Jan 13 10:13 ./config/cartalyst.sentinel-addons.social.php
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 6849 Jan 13 10:13 ./config/cartalyst.sentinel.php
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 1020 Jan 13 10:13 ./config/compile.php
xargs: ls: terminated by signal 13

$ find . -name *.php -print0 | xargs -0 php -l
No syntax errors detected in ./bootstrap/paths.php
No syntax errors detected in ./vendor/watson/validating/src/ValidatingTrait.php
No syntax errors detected in ./vendor/giggsey/libphonenumber-for-php/src/libphonenumber/data/PhoneNumberMetadata_SI.php
No syntax errors detected in ./vendor/php-vcr/php-vcr/src/VCR/Event/BeforePlaybackEvent.php
No syntax errors detected in ./vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Support/Facades/Blade.php
No syntax errors detected in ./resources/views/emails/appointment/updated/body.blade.php
No syntax errors detected in ./app/WL/Modules/Location/Commands/RemoveClientLocationCommand.php


Yet, when I try to parse one of those files I see that it does produce the expected output (either passing or failing parsing):



$ php -l ./bootstrap/cache/services.php
No syntax errors detected in ./bootstrap/cache/services.php


I've checked that neither passing nor failing linting is printing the expected lines to stderr:



$ php -l good.php | grep rr
No syntax errors detected in good.php

$ php -l bad.php | grep rr
PHP Parse error: syntax error, unexpected ''foo'' (T_CONSTANT_ENCAPSED_STRING), expecting ')' in bad.php on line 3
Errors parsing bad.php


What should I check now? My end goal is to lint all the files, then grep for Error parsing to fix those issues.










share|improve this question

















  • 1





    Can the php -l command take multiple arguments with the syntax php -l file1 file2 file3? xargs would be passing the results of find in batches.

    – Haxiel
    Mar 12 at 13:50











  • @Haxiel: Thank you, in fact xargs was batching. Learn something every day!

    – dotancohen
    Mar 12 at 14:17

















2















I am trying to parse a recursive directory of PHP files using the built in PHP linter, which works like this:



$ php -l good.php
No syntax errors detected in good.php

$ php -l bad.php
PHP Parse error: syntax error, unexpected ''foo'' (T_CONSTANT_ENCAPSED_STRING), expecting ')' in bad.php on line 3
Errors parsing bad.php


We can see that files which pass linting output a line containing No syntax errors and those which fail linting output a line containing Errors parsing.



I see that I have 12147 PHP files recursively in the current directory, however the PHP linter is only outputting seven lines:



$ find . -name *.php -print0 | xargs -0 ls -l | wc -l
12147

$ find . -name *.php -print0 | xargs -0 php -l | wc -l
7


As there were only 7 files parsed by PHP, I can use my head with ls to find some files which have not been parsed:



$ find . -name *.php -print0 | xargs -0 ls -l | head
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 1927 Jan 13 10:13 ./bootstrap/app.php
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 1076 Jan 13 10:13 ./bootstrap/autoload.php
-rw-rw-r-- 1 dotan dotan 25620 Mar 12 12:29 ./bootstrap/cache/services.php
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 2493 Jan 13 10:13 ./bootstrap/paths.php
-rwxrwxr-x 1 dotan dotan 20008 Mar 12 12:30 ./config/app.php
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 3304 Jan 13 10:13 ./config/auth.php
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 1819 Jan 13 10:13 ./config/cache.php
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 3751 Jan 13 10:13 ./config/cartalyst.sentinel-addons.social.php
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 6849 Jan 13 10:13 ./config/cartalyst.sentinel.php
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 1020 Jan 13 10:13 ./config/compile.php
xargs: ls: terminated by signal 13

$ find . -name *.php -print0 | xargs -0 php -l
No syntax errors detected in ./bootstrap/paths.php
No syntax errors detected in ./vendor/watson/validating/src/ValidatingTrait.php
No syntax errors detected in ./vendor/giggsey/libphonenumber-for-php/src/libphonenumber/data/PhoneNumberMetadata_SI.php
No syntax errors detected in ./vendor/php-vcr/php-vcr/src/VCR/Event/BeforePlaybackEvent.php
No syntax errors detected in ./vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Support/Facades/Blade.php
No syntax errors detected in ./resources/views/emails/appointment/updated/body.blade.php
No syntax errors detected in ./app/WL/Modules/Location/Commands/RemoveClientLocationCommand.php


Yet, when I try to parse one of those files I see that it does produce the expected output (either passing or failing parsing):



$ php -l ./bootstrap/cache/services.php
No syntax errors detected in ./bootstrap/cache/services.php


I've checked that neither passing nor failing linting is printing the expected lines to stderr:



$ php -l good.php | grep rr
No syntax errors detected in good.php

$ php -l bad.php | grep rr
PHP Parse error: syntax error, unexpected ''foo'' (T_CONSTANT_ENCAPSED_STRING), expecting ')' in bad.php on line 3
Errors parsing bad.php


What should I check now? My end goal is to lint all the files, then grep for Error parsing to fix those issues.










share|improve this question

















  • 1





    Can the php -l command take multiple arguments with the syntax php -l file1 file2 file3? xargs would be passing the results of find in batches.

    – Haxiel
    Mar 12 at 13:50











  • @Haxiel: Thank you, in fact xargs was batching. Learn something every day!

    – dotancohen
    Mar 12 at 14:17













2












2








2








I am trying to parse a recursive directory of PHP files using the built in PHP linter, which works like this:



$ php -l good.php
No syntax errors detected in good.php

$ php -l bad.php
PHP Parse error: syntax error, unexpected ''foo'' (T_CONSTANT_ENCAPSED_STRING), expecting ')' in bad.php on line 3
Errors parsing bad.php


We can see that files which pass linting output a line containing No syntax errors and those which fail linting output a line containing Errors parsing.



I see that I have 12147 PHP files recursively in the current directory, however the PHP linter is only outputting seven lines:



$ find . -name *.php -print0 | xargs -0 ls -l | wc -l
12147

$ find . -name *.php -print0 | xargs -0 php -l | wc -l
7


As there were only 7 files parsed by PHP, I can use my head with ls to find some files which have not been parsed:



$ find . -name *.php -print0 | xargs -0 ls -l | head
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 1927 Jan 13 10:13 ./bootstrap/app.php
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 1076 Jan 13 10:13 ./bootstrap/autoload.php
-rw-rw-r-- 1 dotan dotan 25620 Mar 12 12:29 ./bootstrap/cache/services.php
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 2493 Jan 13 10:13 ./bootstrap/paths.php
-rwxrwxr-x 1 dotan dotan 20008 Mar 12 12:30 ./config/app.php
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 3304 Jan 13 10:13 ./config/auth.php
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 1819 Jan 13 10:13 ./config/cache.php
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 3751 Jan 13 10:13 ./config/cartalyst.sentinel-addons.social.php
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 6849 Jan 13 10:13 ./config/cartalyst.sentinel.php
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 1020 Jan 13 10:13 ./config/compile.php
xargs: ls: terminated by signal 13

$ find . -name *.php -print0 | xargs -0 php -l
No syntax errors detected in ./bootstrap/paths.php
No syntax errors detected in ./vendor/watson/validating/src/ValidatingTrait.php
No syntax errors detected in ./vendor/giggsey/libphonenumber-for-php/src/libphonenumber/data/PhoneNumberMetadata_SI.php
No syntax errors detected in ./vendor/php-vcr/php-vcr/src/VCR/Event/BeforePlaybackEvent.php
No syntax errors detected in ./vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Support/Facades/Blade.php
No syntax errors detected in ./resources/views/emails/appointment/updated/body.blade.php
No syntax errors detected in ./app/WL/Modules/Location/Commands/RemoveClientLocationCommand.php


Yet, when I try to parse one of those files I see that it does produce the expected output (either passing or failing parsing):



$ php -l ./bootstrap/cache/services.php
No syntax errors detected in ./bootstrap/cache/services.php


I've checked that neither passing nor failing linting is printing the expected lines to stderr:



$ php -l good.php | grep rr
No syntax errors detected in good.php

$ php -l bad.php | grep rr
PHP Parse error: syntax error, unexpected ''foo'' (T_CONSTANT_ENCAPSED_STRING), expecting ')' in bad.php on line 3
Errors parsing bad.php


What should I check now? My end goal is to lint all the files, then grep for Error parsing to fix those issues.










share|improve this question














I am trying to parse a recursive directory of PHP files using the built in PHP linter, which works like this:



$ php -l good.php
No syntax errors detected in good.php

$ php -l bad.php
PHP Parse error: syntax error, unexpected ''foo'' (T_CONSTANT_ENCAPSED_STRING), expecting ')' in bad.php on line 3
Errors parsing bad.php


We can see that files which pass linting output a line containing No syntax errors and those which fail linting output a line containing Errors parsing.



I see that I have 12147 PHP files recursively in the current directory, however the PHP linter is only outputting seven lines:



$ find . -name *.php -print0 | xargs -0 ls -l | wc -l
12147

$ find . -name *.php -print0 | xargs -0 php -l | wc -l
7


As there were only 7 files parsed by PHP, I can use my head with ls to find some files which have not been parsed:



$ find . -name *.php -print0 | xargs -0 ls -l | head
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 1927 Jan 13 10:13 ./bootstrap/app.php
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 1076 Jan 13 10:13 ./bootstrap/autoload.php
-rw-rw-r-- 1 dotan dotan 25620 Mar 12 12:29 ./bootstrap/cache/services.php
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 2493 Jan 13 10:13 ./bootstrap/paths.php
-rwxrwxr-x 1 dotan dotan 20008 Mar 12 12:30 ./config/app.php
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 3304 Jan 13 10:13 ./config/auth.php
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 1819 Jan 13 10:13 ./config/cache.php
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 3751 Jan 13 10:13 ./config/cartalyst.sentinel-addons.social.php
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 6849 Jan 13 10:13 ./config/cartalyst.sentinel.php
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 1020 Jan 13 10:13 ./config/compile.php
xargs: ls: terminated by signal 13

$ find . -name *.php -print0 | xargs -0 php -l
No syntax errors detected in ./bootstrap/paths.php
No syntax errors detected in ./vendor/watson/validating/src/ValidatingTrait.php
No syntax errors detected in ./vendor/giggsey/libphonenumber-for-php/src/libphonenumber/data/PhoneNumberMetadata_SI.php
No syntax errors detected in ./vendor/php-vcr/php-vcr/src/VCR/Event/BeforePlaybackEvent.php
No syntax errors detected in ./vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Support/Facades/Blade.php
No syntax errors detected in ./resources/views/emails/appointment/updated/body.blade.php
No syntax errors detected in ./app/WL/Modules/Location/Commands/RemoveClientLocationCommand.php


Yet, when I try to parse one of those files I see that it does produce the expected output (either passing or failing parsing):



$ php -l ./bootstrap/cache/services.php
No syntax errors detected in ./bootstrap/cache/services.php


I've checked that neither passing nor failing linting is printing the expected lines to stderr:



$ php -l good.php | grep rr
No syntax errors detected in good.php

$ php -l bad.php | grep rr
PHP Parse error: syntax error, unexpected ''foo'' (T_CONSTANT_ENCAPSED_STRING), expecting ')' in bad.php on line 3
Errors parsing bad.php


What should I check now? My end goal is to lint all the files, then grep for Error parsing to fix those issues.







bash shell php xargs debugging






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Mar 12 at 13:42









dotancohendotancohen

6,478195997




6,478195997







  • 1





    Can the php -l command take multiple arguments with the syntax php -l file1 file2 file3? xargs would be passing the results of find in batches.

    – Haxiel
    Mar 12 at 13:50











  • @Haxiel: Thank you, in fact xargs was batching. Learn something every day!

    – dotancohen
    Mar 12 at 14:17












  • 1





    Can the php -l command take multiple arguments with the syntax php -l file1 file2 file3? xargs would be passing the results of find in batches.

    – Haxiel
    Mar 12 at 13:50











  • @Haxiel: Thank you, in fact xargs was batching. Learn something every day!

    – dotancohen
    Mar 12 at 14:17







1




1





Can the php -l command take multiple arguments with the syntax php -l file1 file2 file3? xargs would be passing the results of find in batches.

– Haxiel
Mar 12 at 13:50





Can the php -l command take multiple arguments with the syntax php -l file1 file2 file3? xargs would be passing the results of find in batches.

– Haxiel
Mar 12 at 13:50













@Haxiel: Thank you, in fact xargs was batching. Learn something every day!

– dotancohen
Mar 12 at 14:17





@Haxiel: Thank you, in fact xargs was batching. Learn something every day!

– dotancohen
Mar 12 at 14:17










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















7














To see whether xargs makes a difference, run the command lines that it runs. Here are a couple of ways to see exactly what it runs, while not risking changing what it runs:



  • Write a script called php in a temporary directory and put it at the beginning of $PATH. In this script, log the arguments (and optionally run the real php afterwards).

  • Run the whole command line under a logging mechanism such as strace.

You will find that the command is something like



php -l ./bootstrap/app.php ./bootstrap/autoload.php ./bootstrap/cache/services.php …


The next step is to investigate what this command does.



I'm not familiar with php but I guess it only treats the first file name as a PHP script name, and that in lint mode it simply ignores all subsequent arguments. So you need to run php -l once for each script, 12147 times in total, instead of using xargs's grouping behavior.



The easiest way to do that is



find . -name *.php -exec php -l ;


but this command will always return 0 even if some invocations of php return a nonzero status. While find mostly doesn't need xargs in the 21st century, a benefit of xargs is that it returns a nonzero status if any invocation of the command returns a nonzero status. So run xargs, but tell it to only process one file at a time with the -n option.



find . -name *.php -print0 | xargs -0 -n 1 php -l





share|improve this answer























  • As usual, you've hit the nail right on the head. xargs was batching the arguments, and the -n 1 flag was the right solution. In fact I was using -exec to continue working while this question was being resolved, but I prefer xargs as I feel it is a more flexible solution. Thank you.

    – dotancohen
    Mar 12 at 14:15











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f505880%2fwho-is-eating-data-xargs%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









7














To see whether xargs makes a difference, run the command lines that it runs. Here are a couple of ways to see exactly what it runs, while not risking changing what it runs:



  • Write a script called php in a temporary directory and put it at the beginning of $PATH. In this script, log the arguments (and optionally run the real php afterwards).

  • Run the whole command line under a logging mechanism such as strace.

You will find that the command is something like



php -l ./bootstrap/app.php ./bootstrap/autoload.php ./bootstrap/cache/services.php …


The next step is to investigate what this command does.



I'm not familiar with php but I guess it only treats the first file name as a PHP script name, and that in lint mode it simply ignores all subsequent arguments. So you need to run php -l once for each script, 12147 times in total, instead of using xargs's grouping behavior.



The easiest way to do that is



find . -name *.php -exec php -l ;


but this command will always return 0 even if some invocations of php return a nonzero status. While find mostly doesn't need xargs in the 21st century, a benefit of xargs is that it returns a nonzero status if any invocation of the command returns a nonzero status. So run xargs, but tell it to only process one file at a time with the -n option.



find . -name *.php -print0 | xargs -0 -n 1 php -l





share|improve this answer























  • As usual, you've hit the nail right on the head. xargs was batching the arguments, and the -n 1 flag was the right solution. In fact I was using -exec to continue working while this question was being resolved, but I prefer xargs as I feel it is a more flexible solution. Thank you.

    – dotancohen
    Mar 12 at 14:15















7














To see whether xargs makes a difference, run the command lines that it runs. Here are a couple of ways to see exactly what it runs, while not risking changing what it runs:



  • Write a script called php in a temporary directory and put it at the beginning of $PATH. In this script, log the arguments (and optionally run the real php afterwards).

  • Run the whole command line under a logging mechanism such as strace.

You will find that the command is something like



php -l ./bootstrap/app.php ./bootstrap/autoload.php ./bootstrap/cache/services.php …


The next step is to investigate what this command does.



I'm not familiar with php but I guess it only treats the first file name as a PHP script name, and that in lint mode it simply ignores all subsequent arguments. So you need to run php -l once for each script, 12147 times in total, instead of using xargs's grouping behavior.



The easiest way to do that is



find . -name *.php -exec php -l ;


but this command will always return 0 even if some invocations of php return a nonzero status. While find mostly doesn't need xargs in the 21st century, a benefit of xargs is that it returns a nonzero status if any invocation of the command returns a nonzero status. So run xargs, but tell it to only process one file at a time with the -n option.



find . -name *.php -print0 | xargs -0 -n 1 php -l





share|improve this answer























  • As usual, you've hit the nail right on the head. xargs was batching the arguments, and the -n 1 flag was the right solution. In fact I was using -exec to continue working while this question was being resolved, but I prefer xargs as I feel it is a more flexible solution. Thank you.

    – dotancohen
    Mar 12 at 14:15













7












7








7







To see whether xargs makes a difference, run the command lines that it runs. Here are a couple of ways to see exactly what it runs, while not risking changing what it runs:



  • Write a script called php in a temporary directory and put it at the beginning of $PATH. In this script, log the arguments (and optionally run the real php afterwards).

  • Run the whole command line under a logging mechanism such as strace.

You will find that the command is something like



php -l ./bootstrap/app.php ./bootstrap/autoload.php ./bootstrap/cache/services.php …


The next step is to investigate what this command does.



I'm not familiar with php but I guess it only treats the first file name as a PHP script name, and that in lint mode it simply ignores all subsequent arguments. So you need to run php -l once for each script, 12147 times in total, instead of using xargs's grouping behavior.



The easiest way to do that is



find . -name *.php -exec php -l ;


but this command will always return 0 even if some invocations of php return a nonzero status. While find mostly doesn't need xargs in the 21st century, a benefit of xargs is that it returns a nonzero status if any invocation of the command returns a nonzero status. So run xargs, but tell it to only process one file at a time with the -n option.



find . -name *.php -print0 | xargs -0 -n 1 php -l





share|improve this answer













To see whether xargs makes a difference, run the command lines that it runs. Here are a couple of ways to see exactly what it runs, while not risking changing what it runs:



  • Write a script called php in a temporary directory and put it at the beginning of $PATH. In this script, log the arguments (and optionally run the real php afterwards).

  • Run the whole command line under a logging mechanism such as strace.

You will find that the command is something like



php -l ./bootstrap/app.php ./bootstrap/autoload.php ./bootstrap/cache/services.php …


The next step is to investigate what this command does.



I'm not familiar with php but I guess it only treats the first file name as a PHP script name, and that in lint mode it simply ignores all subsequent arguments. So you need to run php -l once for each script, 12147 times in total, instead of using xargs's grouping behavior.



The easiest way to do that is



find . -name *.php -exec php -l ;


but this command will always return 0 even if some invocations of php return a nonzero status. While find mostly doesn't need xargs in the 21st century, a benefit of xargs is that it returns a nonzero status if any invocation of the command returns a nonzero status. So run xargs, but tell it to only process one file at a time with the -n option.



find . -name *.php -print0 | xargs -0 -n 1 php -l






share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Mar 12 at 13:56









GillesGilles

547k13011131628




547k13011131628












  • As usual, you've hit the nail right on the head. xargs was batching the arguments, and the -n 1 flag was the right solution. In fact I was using -exec to continue working while this question was being resolved, but I prefer xargs as I feel it is a more flexible solution. Thank you.

    – dotancohen
    Mar 12 at 14:15

















  • As usual, you've hit the nail right on the head. xargs was batching the arguments, and the -n 1 flag was the right solution. In fact I was using -exec to continue working while this question was being resolved, but I prefer xargs as I feel it is a more flexible solution. Thank you.

    – dotancohen
    Mar 12 at 14:15
















As usual, you've hit the nail right on the head. xargs was batching the arguments, and the -n 1 flag was the right solution. In fact I was using -exec to continue working while this question was being resolved, but I prefer xargs as I feel it is a more flexible solution. Thank you.

– dotancohen
Mar 12 at 14:15





As usual, you've hit the nail right on the head. xargs was batching the arguments, and the -n 1 flag was the right solution. In fact I was using -exec to continue working while this question was being resolved, but I prefer xargs as I feel it is a more flexible solution. Thank you.

– dotancohen
Mar 12 at 14:15

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f505880%2fwho-is-eating-data-xargs%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown






Popular posts from this blog

How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

Bahrain

Postfix configuration issue with fips on centos 7; mailgun relay