All possible A of Ax=b with constraints on A

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP












5












$begingroup$


I have a linear problem that I want to solve but the method is quite different from normal, the problem is still Ax=b. However,
in this instant I have A being unknown, apart from the fact that each entry in A can only be zero or 1. Further I have x being known and fixed, the same holds for b.



My question, is it a easy method for getting mathematica to spit out all possible A such that Ax=b given conditions on A.



I tried doing a number of for loops etc, however, I have completely given up after number of hours and the expectation that my effort is incorrect.










share|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    You should be able to use Tuples + Partition (after perhaps filtering out nonsingular candidates).
    $endgroup$
    – J. M. is slightly pensive
    Mar 5 at 12:13










  • $begingroup$
    Please post a concrete example. Also note this is essentially the same as this recent MSE question
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Lichtblau
    Mar 5 at 16:13















5












$begingroup$


I have a linear problem that I want to solve but the method is quite different from normal, the problem is still Ax=b. However,
in this instant I have A being unknown, apart from the fact that each entry in A can only be zero or 1. Further I have x being known and fixed, the same holds for b.



My question, is it a easy method for getting mathematica to spit out all possible A such that Ax=b given conditions on A.



I tried doing a number of for loops etc, however, I have completely given up after number of hours and the expectation that my effort is incorrect.










share|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    You should be able to use Tuples + Partition (after perhaps filtering out nonsingular candidates).
    $endgroup$
    – J. M. is slightly pensive
    Mar 5 at 12:13










  • $begingroup$
    Please post a concrete example. Also note this is essentially the same as this recent MSE question
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Lichtblau
    Mar 5 at 16:13













5












5








5





$begingroup$


I have a linear problem that I want to solve but the method is quite different from normal, the problem is still Ax=b. However,
in this instant I have A being unknown, apart from the fact that each entry in A can only be zero or 1. Further I have x being known and fixed, the same holds for b.



My question, is it a easy method for getting mathematica to spit out all possible A such that Ax=b given conditions on A.



I tried doing a number of for loops etc, however, I have completely given up after number of hours and the expectation that my effort is incorrect.










share|improve this question









$endgroup$




I have a linear problem that I want to solve but the method is quite different from normal, the problem is still Ax=b. However,
in this instant I have A being unknown, apart from the fact that each entry in A can only be zero or 1. Further I have x being known and fixed, the same holds for b.



My question, is it a easy method for getting mathematica to spit out all possible A such that Ax=b given conditions on A.



I tried doing a number of for loops etc, however, I have completely given up after number of hours and the expectation that my effort is incorrect.







probability-or-statistics linear-algebra






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Mar 5 at 11:49









ALEXANDERALEXANDER

634518




634518











  • $begingroup$
    You should be able to use Tuples + Partition (after perhaps filtering out nonsingular candidates).
    $endgroup$
    – J. M. is slightly pensive
    Mar 5 at 12:13










  • $begingroup$
    Please post a concrete example. Also note this is essentially the same as this recent MSE question
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Lichtblau
    Mar 5 at 16:13
















  • $begingroup$
    You should be able to use Tuples + Partition (after perhaps filtering out nonsingular candidates).
    $endgroup$
    – J. M. is slightly pensive
    Mar 5 at 12:13










  • $begingroup$
    Please post a concrete example. Also note this is essentially the same as this recent MSE question
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Lichtblau
    Mar 5 at 16:13















$begingroup$
You should be able to use Tuples + Partition (after perhaps filtering out nonsingular candidates).
$endgroup$
– J. M. is slightly pensive
Mar 5 at 12:13




$begingroup$
You should be able to use Tuples + Partition (after perhaps filtering out nonsingular candidates).
$endgroup$
– J. M. is slightly pensive
Mar 5 at 12:13












$begingroup$
Please post a concrete example. Also note this is essentially the same as this recent MSE question
$endgroup$
– Daniel Lichtblau
Mar 5 at 16:13




$begingroup$
Please post a concrete example. Also note this is essentially the same as this recent MSE question
$endgroup$
– Daniel Lichtblau
Mar 5 at 16:13










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















6












$begingroup$

Here's a way to code up your problem with Solve automatically:



x = 1, 2, 3;
b = Reverse[x];
sol[x_List, b_List] /; Length[x] === Length[b] := Module[mat, vars,
mat = Array[[FormalM], Length[x]*1, 1]; (* construct a matrix of variables*)
vars = Flatten[mat];
mat /.
Solve[And @@ Thread[mat.x == b] (* Construct the equations *)
&& vars ∈ Integers && And @@ Thread[0 <= vars <= 1] (* constraints *),
vars
]
];
matrixSolutions = sol[x, b]



0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0




As you can see, 2 solutions were found. Check that the residuals of the solutions are zero vectors:



#.x - b & /@ matrixSolutions



0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0




It works, but I don't know how scalable this approach is. Instead of Solve, you can also use NSolve and/or FindInstance (you can just replace Solve with any of those two functions in the code above).






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$




















    1












    $begingroup$

    Pretty much the same questions as



    FrobeniusSolve with solutions only being 0 or 1 being acceptable



    Using @Sjoerd's problem



    x = 1, 2, 3;
    b = Reverse[x];


    Can write solution as



    res = Tuples@(Select[FrobeniusSolve[x, #], Max@# <= 1 &] & /@ b)

    (* 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0,
    1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0 *)





    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      );
      );
      , "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "387"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f192643%2fall-possible-a-of-ax-b-with-constraints-on-a%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      6












      $begingroup$

      Here's a way to code up your problem with Solve automatically:



      x = 1, 2, 3;
      b = Reverse[x];
      sol[x_List, b_List] /; Length[x] === Length[b] := Module[mat, vars,
      mat = Array[[FormalM], Length[x]*1, 1]; (* construct a matrix of variables*)
      vars = Flatten[mat];
      mat /.
      Solve[And @@ Thread[mat.x == b] (* Construct the equations *)
      && vars ∈ Integers && And @@ Thread[0 <= vars <= 1] (* constraints *),
      vars
      ]
      ];
      matrixSolutions = sol[x, b]



      0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0




      As you can see, 2 solutions were found. Check that the residuals of the solutions are zero vectors:



      #.x - b & /@ matrixSolutions



      0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0




      It works, but I don't know how scalable this approach is. Instead of Solve, you can also use NSolve and/or FindInstance (you can just replace Solve with any of those two functions in the code above).






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$

















        6












        $begingroup$

        Here's a way to code up your problem with Solve automatically:



        x = 1, 2, 3;
        b = Reverse[x];
        sol[x_List, b_List] /; Length[x] === Length[b] := Module[mat, vars,
        mat = Array[[FormalM], Length[x]*1, 1]; (* construct a matrix of variables*)
        vars = Flatten[mat];
        mat /.
        Solve[And @@ Thread[mat.x == b] (* Construct the equations *)
        && vars ∈ Integers && And @@ Thread[0 <= vars <= 1] (* constraints *),
        vars
        ]
        ];
        matrixSolutions = sol[x, b]



        0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0




        As you can see, 2 solutions were found. Check that the residuals of the solutions are zero vectors:



        #.x - b & /@ matrixSolutions



        0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0




        It works, but I don't know how scalable this approach is. Instead of Solve, you can also use NSolve and/or FindInstance (you can just replace Solve with any of those two functions in the code above).






        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$















          6












          6








          6





          $begingroup$

          Here's a way to code up your problem with Solve automatically:



          x = 1, 2, 3;
          b = Reverse[x];
          sol[x_List, b_List] /; Length[x] === Length[b] := Module[mat, vars,
          mat = Array[[FormalM], Length[x]*1, 1]; (* construct a matrix of variables*)
          vars = Flatten[mat];
          mat /.
          Solve[And @@ Thread[mat.x == b] (* Construct the equations *)
          && vars ∈ Integers && And @@ Thread[0 <= vars <= 1] (* constraints *),
          vars
          ]
          ];
          matrixSolutions = sol[x, b]



          0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0




          As you can see, 2 solutions were found. Check that the residuals of the solutions are zero vectors:



          #.x - b & /@ matrixSolutions



          0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0




          It works, but I don't know how scalable this approach is. Instead of Solve, you can also use NSolve and/or FindInstance (you can just replace Solve with any of those two functions in the code above).






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          Here's a way to code up your problem with Solve automatically:



          x = 1, 2, 3;
          b = Reverse[x];
          sol[x_List, b_List] /; Length[x] === Length[b] := Module[mat, vars,
          mat = Array[[FormalM], Length[x]*1, 1]; (* construct a matrix of variables*)
          vars = Flatten[mat];
          mat /.
          Solve[And @@ Thread[mat.x == b] (* Construct the equations *)
          && vars ∈ Integers && And @@ Thread[0 <= vars <= 1] (* constraints *),
          vars
          ]
          ];
          matrixSolutions = sol[x, b]



          0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0




          As you can see, 2 solutions were found. Check that the residuals of the solutions are zero vectors:



          #.x - b & /@ matrixSolutions



          0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0




          It works, but I don't know how scalable this approach is. Instead of Solve, you can also use NSolve and/or FindInstance (you can just replace Solve with any of those two functions in the code above).







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Mar 5 at 17:09









          MarcoB

          38.4k557115




          38.4k557115










          answered Mar 5 at 12:38









          Sjoerd SmitSjoerd Smit

          4,255816




          4,255816





















              1












              $begingroup$

              Pretty much the same questions as



              FrobeniusSolve with solutions only being 0 or 1 being acceptable



              Using @Sjoerd's problem



              x = 1, 2, 3;
              b = Reverse[x];


              Can write solution as



              res = Tuples@(Select[FrobeniusSolve[x, #], Max@# <= 1 &] & /@ b)

              (* 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0,
              1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0 *)





              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$

















                1












                $begingroup$

                Pretty much the same questions as



                FrobeniusSolve with solutions only being 0 or 1 being acceptable



                Using @Sjoerd's problem



                x = 1, 2, 3;
                b = Reverse[x];


                Can write solution as



                res = Tuples@(Select[FrobeniusSolve[x, #], Max@# <= 1 &] & /@ b)

                (* 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0,
                1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0 *)





                share|improve this answer











                $endgroup$















                  1












                  1








                  1





                  $begingroup$

                  Pretty much the same questions as



                  FrobeniusSolve with solutions only being 0 or 1 being acceptable



                  Using @Sjoerd's problem



                  x = 1, 2, 3;
                  b = Reverse[x];


                  Can write solution as



                  res = Tuples@(Select[FrobeniusSolve[x, #], Max@# <= 1 &] & /@ b)

                  (* 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0,
                  1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0 *)





                  share|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$



                  Pretty much the same questions as



                  FrobeniusSolve with solutions only being 0 or 1 being acceptable



                  Using @Sjoerd's problem



                  x = 1, 2, 3;
                  b = Reverse[x];


                  Can write solution as



                  res = Tuples@(Select[FrobeniusSolve[x, #], Max@# <= 1 &] & /@ b)

                  (* 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0,
                  1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0 *)






                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited Mar 5 at 18:25

























                  answered Mar 5 at 18:20









                  MikeYMikeY

                  3,758916




                  3,758916



























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded
















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematica Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f192643%2fall-possible-a-of-ax-b-with-constraints-on-a%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown






                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Peggy Mitchell

                      Palaiologos

                      The Forum (Inglewood, California)