Can you assign different DNS servers to different network interfaces?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP












0















I am trying to have my eth1 use 10.50.1.11 and 10.50.1.12 dns servers whilst my eth0 interface uses 8.8.8.8 and 8.8.4.4 dns servers.
I am running centos 7 vms within xenserver 6.5. eth1 is a closed-circuit vlan, whilst eth0 is the public network. The problem im having is that my centos
client automatically picks which dns server it uses based upon which interface comes up first. I know that when you define dns servers in
/etc/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 or /etc/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth1, it prints it out inside of /etc/resolv.conf, but i cant find a workaround for this.
Does anyone know if you can assign different DNS servers to different network interfaces?










share|improve this question



















  • 3





    DNS does not work as you think it works. It is global to the system, not based on interface.

    – Rui F Ribeiro
    Mar 5 at 17:31







  • 1





    This sounds like an XY problem. Consider asking a separate question where you explain what exactly is the end result that you want to achieve. This general question is still perfectly valid and interesting for people wondering how DNS resolution works.

    – TooTea
    Mar 5 at 18:05






  • 1





    You can use network namespaces, put eth0 and eth1 into different namespaces (or one in the main namespace, one in a new namespace). Network namespace allows different versions of resolv.conf in /etc/netns/<namespace_name>/resolv.conf, at least for sufficiently modern applications that pay attention to that.

    – dirkt
    Mar 6 at 11:08















0















I am trying to have my eth1 use 10.50.1.11 and 10.50.1.12 dns servers whilst my eth0 interface uses 8.8.8.8 and 8.8.4.4 dns servers.
I am running centos 7 vms within xenserver 6.5. eth1 is a closed-circuit vlan, whilst eth0 is the public network. The problem im having is that my centos
client automatically picks which dns server it uses based upon which interface comes up first. I know that when you define dns servers in
/etc/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 or /etc/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth1, it prints it out inside of /etc/resolv.conf, but i cant find a workaround for this.
Does anyone know if you can assign different DNS servers to different network interfaces?










share|improve this question



















  • 3





    DNS does not work as you think it works. It is global to the system, not based on interface.

    – Rui F Ribeiro
    Mar 5 at 17:31







  • 1





    This sounds like an XY problem. Consider asking a separate question where you explain what exactly is the end result that you want to achieve. This general question is still perfectly valid and interesting for people wondering how DNS resolution works.

    – TooTea
    Mar 5 at 18:05






  • 1





    You can use network namespaces, put eth0 and eth1 into different namespaces (or one in the main namespace, one in a new namespace). Network namespace allows different versions of resolv.conf in /etc/netns/<namespace_name>/resolv.conf, at least for sufficiently modern applications that pay attention to that.

    – dirkt
    Mar 6 at 11:08













0












0








0








I am trying to have my eth1 use 10.50.1.11 and 10.50.1.12 dns servers whilst my eth0 interface uses 8.8.8.8 and 8.8.4.4 dns servers.
I am running centos 7 vms within xenserver 6.5. eth1 is a closed-circuit vlan, whilst eth0 is the public network. The problem im having is that my centos
client automatically picks which dns server it uses based upon which interface comes up first. I know that when you define dns servers in
/etc/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 or /etc/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth1, it prints it out inside of /etc/resolv.conf, but i cant find a workaround for this.
Does anyone know if you can assign different DNS servers to different network interfaces?










share|improve this question
















I am trying to have my eth1 use 10.50.1.11 and 10.50.1.12 dns servers whilst my eth0 interface uses 8.8.8.8 and 8.8.4.4 dns servers.
I am running centos 7 vms within xenserver 6.5. eth1 is a closed-circuit vlan, whilst eth0 is the public network. The problem im having is that my centos
client automatically picks which dns server it uses based upon which interface comes up first. I know that when you define dns servers in
/etc/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 or /etc/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth1, it prints it out inside of /etc/resolv.conf, but i cant find a workaround for this.
Does anyone know if you can assign different DNS servers to different network interfaces?







centos networking dns network-interface xen






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Mar 5 at 17:30









Rui F Ribeiro

41.8k1483142




41.8k1483142










asked Mar 5 at 17:11









DodeDode

32




32







  • 3





    DNS does not work as you think it works. It is global to the system, not based on interface.

    – Rui F Ribeiro
    Mar 5 at 17:31







  • 1





    This sounds like an XY problem. Consider asking a separate question where you explain what exactly is the end result that you want to achieve. This general question is still perfectly valid and interesting for people wondering how DNS resolution works.

    – TooTea
    Mar 5 at 18:05






  • 1





    You can use network namespaces, put eth0 and eth1 into different namespaces (or one in the main namespace, one in a new namespace). Network namespace allows different versions of resolv.conf in /etc/netns/<namespace_name>/resolv.conf, at least for sufficiently modern applications that pay attention to that.

    – dirkt
    Mar 6 at 11:08












  • 3





    DNS does not work as you think it works. It is global to the system, not based on interface.

    – Rui F Ribeiro
    Mar 5 at 17:31







  • 1





    This sounds like an XY problem. Consider asking a separate question where you explain what exactly is the end result that you want to achieve. This general question is still perfectly valid and interesting for people wondering how DNS resolution works.

    – TooTea
    Mar 5 at 18:05






  • 1





    You can use network namespaces, put eth0 and eth1 into different namespaces (or one in the main namespace, one in a new namespace). Network namespace allows different versions of resolv.conf in /etc/netns/<namespace_name>/resolv.conf, at least for sufficiently modern applications that pay attention to that.

    – dirkt
    Mar 6 at 11:08







3




3





DNS does not work as you think it works. It is global to the system, not based on interface.

– Rui F Ribeiro
Mar 5 at 17:31






DNS does not work as you think it works. It is global to the system, not based on interface.

– Rui F Ribeiro
Mar 5 at 17:31





1




1





This sounds like an XY problem. Consider asking a separate question where you explain what exactly is the end result that you want to achieve. This general question is still perfectly valid and interesting for people wondering how DNS resolution works.

– TooTea
Mar 5 at 18:05





This sounds like an XY problem. Consider asking a separate question where you explain what exactly is the end result that you want to achieve. This general question is still perfectly valid and interesting for people wondering how DNS resolution works.

– TooTea
Mar 5 at 18:05




1




1





You can use network namespaces, put eth0 and eth1 into different namespaces (or one in the main namespace, one in a new namespace). Network namespace allows different versions of resolv.conf in /etc/netns/<namespace_name>/resolv.conf, at least for sufficiently modern applications that pay attention to that.

– dirkt
Mar 6 at 11:08





You can use network namespaces, put eth0 and eth1 into different namespaces (or one in the main namespace, one in a new namespace). Network namespace allows different versions of resolv.conf in /etc/netns/<namespace_name>/resolv.conf, at least for sufficiently modern applications that pay attention to that.

– dirkt
Mar 6 at 11:08










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1














No, that simply can't be done due to the way address resolution works.



When a process on the machine wants to connect to, say, example.com, it first calls a library routine like getaddrinfo or gethostbyname. The purpose of these routines is to translate the DNS name to an IP address. So they look into /etc/resolv.conf, read the IP address of a DNS server, send a DNS query packet to that server, receive the reply and return the resulting IP address to the caller.



At that point, the process takes the resolved IP address and passes it to a system call such as connect. This is where the kernel steps in, looks into its routing table and figures out which interface to use to connect to that address.



So in short, DNS settings simply cannot depend on the interface used for communication, because the choice of that interface itself depends on the DNS settings.






share|improve this answer























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "106"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f504547%2fcan-you-assign-different-dns-servers-to-different-network-interfaces%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1














    No, that simply can't be done due to the way address resolution works.



    When a process on the machine wants to connect to, say, example.com, it first calls a library routine like getaddrinfo or gethostbyname. The purpose of these routines is to translate the DNS name to an IP address. So they look into /etc/resolv.conf, read the IP address of a DNS server, send a DNS query packet to that server, receive the reply and return the resulting IP address to the caller.



    At that point, the process takes the resolved IP address and passes it to a system call such as connect. This is where the kernel steps in, looks into its routing table and figures out which interface to use to connect to that address.



    So in short, DNS settings simply cannot depend on the interface used for communication, because the choice of that interface itself depends on the DNS settings.






    share|improve this answer



























      1














      No, that simply can't be done due to the way address resolution works.



      When a process on the machine wants to connect to, say, example.com, it first calls a library routine like getaddrinfo or gethostbyname. The purpose of these routines is to translate the DNS name to an IP address. So they look into /etc/resolv.conf, read the IP address of a DNS server, send a DNS query packet to that server, receive the reply and return the resulting IP address to the caller.



      At that point, the process takes the resolved IP address and passes it to a system call such as connect. This is where the kernel steps in, looks into its routing table and figures out which interface to use to connect to that address.



      So in short, DNS settings simply cannot depend on the interface used for communication, because the choice of that interface itself depends on the DNS settings.






      share|improve this answer

























        1












        1








        1







        No, that simply can't be done due to the way address resolution works.



        When a process on the machine wants to connect to, say, example.com, it first calls a library routine like getaddrinfo or gethostbyname. The purpose of these routines is to translate the DNS name to an IP address. So they look into /etc/resolv.conf, read the IP address of a DNS server, send a DNS query packet to that server, receive the reply and return the resulting IP address to the caller.



        At that point, the process takes the resolved IP address and passes it to a system call such as connect. This is where the kernel steps in, looks into its routing table and figures out which interface to use to connect to that address.



        So in short, DNS settings simply cannot depend on the interface used for communication, because the choice of that interface itself depends on the DNS settings.






        share|improve this answer













        No, that simply can't be done due to the way address resolution works.



        When a process on the machine wants to connect to, say, example.com, it first calls a library routine like getaddrinfo or gethostbyname. The purpose of these routines is to translate the DNS name to an IP address. So they look into /etc/resolv.conf, read the IP address of a DNS server, send a DNS query packet to that server, receive the reply and return the resulting IP address to the caller.



        At that point, the process takes the resolved IP address and passes it to a system call such as connect. This is where the kernel steps in, looks into its routing table and figures out which interface to use to connect to that address.



        So in short, DNS settings simply cannot depend on the interface used for communication, because the choice of that interface itself depends on the DNS settings.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Mar 5 at 18:00









        TooTeaTooTea

        784211




        784211



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f504547%2fcan-you-assign-different-dns-servers-to-different-network-interfaces%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown






            Popular posts from this blog

            How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

            Bahrain

            Postfix configuration issue with fips on centos 7; mailgun relay