What senses are available to a corpse subjected to a Speak with Dead spell?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
$begingroup$
When someone uses Speak with Dead on a corpse, the spell says that you can ask the corpse up to five questions. Asking implies that the corpse can hear you.
What I want to know is whether or not the corpse's other senses are intact?
Could I show the corpse a picture and ask them to describe it?
Could I put a flower to a corpses nose and ask them to tell me what
they smell?Could I write down the five questions and get the corpse to read
them?
The reason I am asking is because, during a session I was DMing, I ruled that the corpse could not read the scroll that the party was showing them. But after the session, the ruling I made felt unfinished. I need to make sure I took everything into account and didn't flub the ruling.
dnd-5e spells
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
When someone uses Speak with Dead on a corpse, the spell says that you can ask the corpse up to five questions. Asking implies that the corpse can hear you.
What I want to know is whether or not the corpse's other senses are intact?
Could I show the corpse a picture and ask them to describe it?
Could I put a flower to a corpses nose and ask them to tell me what
they smell?Could I write down the five questions and get the corpse to read
them?
The reason I am asking is because, during a session I was DMing, I ruled that the corpse could not read the scroll that the party was showing them. But after the session, the ruling I made felt unfinished. I need to make sure I took everything into account and didn't flub the ruling.
dnd-5e spells
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
When someone uses Speak with Dead on a corpse, the spell says that you can ask the corpse up to five questions. Asking implies that the corpse can hear you.
What I want to know is whether or not the corpse's other senses are intact?
Could I show the corpse a picture and ask them to describe it?
Could I put a flower to a corpses nose and ask them to tell me what
they smell?Could I write down the five questions and get the corpse to read
them?
The reason I am asking is because, during a session I was DMing, I ruled that the corpse could not read the scroll that the party was showing them. But after the session, the ruling I made felt unfinished. I need to make sure I took everything into account and didn't flub the ruling.
dnd-5e spells
$endgroup$
When someone uses Speak with Dead on a corpse, the spell says that you can ask the corpse up to five questions. Asking implies that the corpse can hear you.
What I want to know is whether or not the corpse's other senses are intact?
Could I show the corpse a picture and ask them to describe it?
Could I put a flower to a corpses nose and ask them to tell me what
they smell?Could I write down the five questions and get the corpse to read
them?
The reason I am asking is because, during a session I was DMing, I ruled that the corpse could not read the scroll that the party was showing them. But after the session, the ruling I made felt unfinished. I need to make sure I took everything into account and didn't flub the ruling.
dnd-5e spells
dnd-5e spells
edited Feb 25 at 18:12
Rubiksmoose
59.2k10287439
59.2k10287439
asked Feb 25 at 17:45
fiendfiend
1,709733
1,709733
add a comment |
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The rules don't specify operating senses
This is a decent case for relying on "spells do what they say they do" and keeping the interaction simple. Here is what the spell will do.
You grant the semblance of life and Intelligence to a corpse of your
choice within range, allowing it to answer the questions you pose. The
corpse must still have a mouth and can’t be Undead. The spell fails if
the corpse was the target of this spell within the last 10 days. (Basic Rules, p. 105)
The corpse is not alive, it has "the semblance of life" and Intelligence. Intelligence is described as being the key attribute for memory.
The corpse knows only what it knew in life, including the languages
it knew.
Memory being required to recall what it knew in life fits Intelligence being magically activated.
Intelligence Measures: Mental acuity, information recall, analytical
skill (Basic Rules, p. 10)
Intelligence, measuring reasoning and memory(Basic Rules, p. 60)
bolding mine
The magic allows the otherwise dead corpse to answer your questions. Beyond that, the spell description doesn't activate, nor reanimate, anything else.
Your ruling was correct
You are the DM (per your comment). You ruled that the corpse could not read the scroll; your ruling captured the spell's powers correctly. If you want go beyond that at your table, it's your call.
Rules as Fun...
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I am the DM, and during the session I ruled that the corpse could not read the scroll that the party was showing them. But after the session, the ruling I made felt unfinished. I need to make sure I took everything into account and didn't flub the ruling.
$endgroup$
– fiend
Feb 25 at 18:08
$begingroup$
@fiend OK, I'll remove that part.
$endgroup$
– KorvinStarmast
Feb 25 at 18:09
$begingroup$
The spell also mentions the target "recognizing you as an enemy," but doesn't go into the specifics (Sight? Sound? Language? Universal magic name tag?). How you rule on its ability to decipher photographs will tie in to how enemy recognition works.
$endgroup$
– AceCalhoon
Feb 25 at 20:06
1
$begingroup$
@AceCalhoon You've definitely got a question in there...:)
$endgroup$
– NautArch
Feb 25 at 21:58
2
$begingroup$
I've chosen this answer as it lines up best with how I ruled and interpreted the spell during my game. I think the handavy "magic" stuff makes the most sense, especially when you throw in the stuff about recognizing the caster as an enemy, it leads to the conclusion that the "magic" of the spell just establishes a connection to the corpse and the corpse is aware of who and what the caster is.
$endgroup$
– fiend
Feb 26 at 13:29
|
show 5 more comments
$begingroup$
None
The corpse has no access to senses, including hearing. The caster magically has interactive access to its memories, but it has no access to its environment at all.
Speak with dead magically asks the questions of the corpse. It makes it seem alive again, but it says this is only a cosmetic seeming, not real (“the semblance of life and intelligence”). It doesn’t grant implied hearing—if it granted hearing it would say so explicitly, with something like, “restores hearing to the corpse for the duration”.
The spell lets the caster ask questions and get answers that the corpse knew in life. They can’t add anything to its knowledge and then ask it questions about what was(n’t) just added: it can’t be taught new things.
It is explicitly unaware of what’s happening during the spell:
the corpse can't learn new information, doesn't comprehend anything that has happened since it died
… including during the spell.
Only the magic of the spell allows the questions—only the questions—to penetrate. The spell basically magically extracts existing information from the corpse using an intuitive voice-activated interface, not actually allows the caster to deal with a thinking creature.
So:
The caster can ask it to describe a picture it knew in life. They can’t show it something it hasn’t seen before and ask questions about it.
The caster can ask what it remembers roses smell like. They can’t place a new flower under its dead nose and ask it questions about the new flower.
The caster can ask it what was written on a paper it knew in life. They can’t show it a new paper and ask questions about the new thing.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Ask the DM
The spell description indicates that the corpse can speak. All other details are up to the DM. The fact that you can ask the corpse questions arguably implies that the corpse can hear (or that the spell allows you to transmit questions to it in some other way), but even this is up to interpretation.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Where does it say the corpse can hear?
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
Feb 25 at 18:28
$begingroup$
I suppose even that is up to interpretation, but you can ask it questions.
$endgroup$
– Harris M Snyder
Feb 25 at 18:30
$begingroup$
Answer updated to clarify.
$endgroup$
– Harris M Snyder
Feb 25 at 18:32
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It can if it can see and knows the language
If the corpse still has it's eyes it should be able to see as the spell gives it a semblance of life and intelligence. If the scroll is written in a language that the creature knew in life it will be able to read it since that is knowledge it had in life.
The corpse not being able to learn won't prevent it from being able to read the contents of a scroll. It just won't be able to learn from the information in the scroll. For example if the scroll contains the BBEG's plans to retreat to their hidden base, you can't ask the corpse to guess where the base might be given the contents of the scroll. It can only tell you what it actually knew in life.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f141914%2fwhat-senses-are-available-to-a-corpse-subjected-to-a-speak-with-dead-spell%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The rules don't specify operating senses
This is a decent case for relying on "spells do what they say they do" and keeping the interaction simple. Here is what the spell will do.
You grant the semblance of life and Intelligence to a corpse of your
choice within range, allowing it to answer the questions you pose. The
corpse must still have a mouth and can’t be Undead. The spell fails if
the corpse was the target of this spell within the last 10 days. (Basic Rules, p. 105)
The corpse is not alive, it has "the semblance of life" and Intelligence. Intelligence is described as being the key attribute for memory.
The corpse knows only what it knew in life, including the languages
it knew.
Memory being required to recall what it knew in life fits Intelligence being magically activated.
Intelligence Measures: Mental acuity, information recall, analytical
skill (Basic Rules, p. 10)
Intelligence, measuring reasoning and memory(Basic Rules, p. 60)
bolding mine
The magic allows the otherwise dead corpse to answer your questions. Beyond that, the spell description doesn't activate, nor reanimate, anything else.
Your ruling was correct
You are the DM (per your comment). You ruled that the corpse could not read the scroll; your ruling captured the spell's powers correctly. If you want go beyond that at your table, it's your call.
Rules as Fun...
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I am the DM, and during the session I ruled that the corpse could not read the scroll that the party was showing them. But after the session, the ruling I made felt unfinished. I need to make sure I took everything into account and didn't flub the ruling.
$endgroup$
– fiend
Feb 25 at 18:08
$begingroup$
@fiend OK, I'll remove that part.
$endgroup$
– KorvinStarmast
Feb 25 at 18:09
$begingroup$
The spell also mentions the target "recognizing you as an enemy," but doesn't go into the specifics (Sight? Sound? Language? Universal magic name tag?). How you rule on its ability to decipher photographs will tie in to how enemy recognition works.
$endgroup$
– AceCalhoon
Feb 25 at 20:06
1
$begingroup$
@AceCalhoon You've definitely got a question in there...:)
$endgroup$
– NautArch
Feb 25 at 21:58
2
$begingroup$
I've chosen this answer as it lines up best with how I ruled and interpreted the spell during my game. I think the handavy "magic" stuff makes the most sense, especially when you throw in the stuff about recognizing the caster as an enemy, it leads to the conclusion that the "magic" of the spell just establishes a connection to the corpse and the corpse is aware of who and what the caster is.
$endgroup$
– fiend
Feb 26 at 13:29
|
show 5 more comments
$begingroup$
The rules don't specify operating senses
This is a decent case for relying on "spells do what they say they do" and keeping the interaction simple. Here is what the spell will do.
You grant the semblance of life and Intelligence to a corpse of your
choice within range, allowing it to answer the questions you pose. The
corpse must still have a mouth and can’t be Undead. The spell fails if
the corpse was the target of this spell within the last 10 days. (Basic Rules, p. 105)
The corpse is not alive, it has "the semblance of life" and Intelligence. Intelligence is described as being the key attribute for memory.
The corpse knows only what it knew in life, including the languages
it knew.
Memory being required to recall what it knew in life fits Intelligence being magically activated.
Intelligence Measures: Mental acuity, information recall, analytical
skill (Basic Rules, p. 10)
Intelligence, measuring reasoning and memory(Basic Rules, p. 60)
bolding mine
The magic allows the otherwise dead corpse to answer your questions. Beyond that, the spell description doesn't activate, nor reanimate, anything else.
Your ruling was correct
You are the DM (per your comment). You ruled that the corpse could not read the scroll; your ruling captured the spell's powers correctly. If you want go beyond that at your table, it's your call.
Rules as Fun...
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I am the DM, and during the session I ruled that the corpse could not read the scroll that the party was showing them. But after the session, the ruling I made felt unfinished. I need to make sure I took everything into account and didn't flub the ruling.
$endgroup$
– fiend
Feb 25 at 18:08
$begingroup$
@fiend OK, I'll remove that part.
$endgroup$
– KorvinStarmast
Feb 25 at 18:09
$begingroup$
The spell also mentions the target "recognizing you as an enemy," but doesn't go into the specifics (Sight? Sound? Language? Universal magic name tag?). How you rule on its ability to decipher photographs will tie in to how enemy recognition works.
$endgroup$
– AceCalhoon
Feb 25 at 20:06
1
$begingroup$
@AceCalhoon You've definitely got a question in there...:)
$endgroup$
– NautArch
Feb 25 at 21:58
2
$begingroup$
I've chosen this answer as it lines up best with how I ruled and interpreted the spell during my game. I think the handavy "magic" stuff makes the most sense, especially when you throw in the stuff about recognizing the caster as an enemy, it leads to the conclusion that the "magic" of the spell just establishes a connection to the corpse and the corpse is aware of who and what the caster is.
$endgroup$
– fiend
Feb 26 at 13:29
|
show 5 more comments
$begingroup$
The rules don't specify operating senses
This is a decent case for relying on "spells do what they say they do" and keeping the interaction simple. Here is what the spell will do.
You grant the semblance of life and Intelligence to a corpse of your
choice within range, allowing it to answer the questions you pose. The
corpse must still have a mouth and can’t be Undead. The spell fails if
the corpse was the target of this spell within the last 10 days. (Basic Rules, p. 105)
The corpse is not alive, it has "the semblance of life" and Intelligence. Intelligence is described as being the key attribute for memory.
The corpse knows only what it knew in life, including the languages
it knew.
Memory being required to recall what it knew in life fits Intelligence being magically activated.
Intelligence Measures: Mental acuity, information recall, analytical
skill (Basic Rules, p. 10)
Intelligence, measuring reasoning and memory(Basic Rules, p. 60)
bolding mine
The magic allows the otherwise dead corpse to answer your questions. Beyond that, the spell description doesn't activate, nor reanimate, anything else.
Your ruling was correct
You are the DM (per your comment). You ruled that the corpse could not read the scroll; your ruling captured the spell's powers correctly. If you want go beyond that at your table, it's your call.
Rules as Fun...
$endgroup$
The rules don't specify operating senses
This is a decent case for relying on "spells do what they say they do" and keeping the interaction simple. Here is what the spell will do.
You grant the semblance of life and Intelligence to a corpse of your
choice within range, allowing it to answer the questions you pose. The
corpse must still have a mouth and can’t be Undead. The spell fails if
the corpse was the target of this spell within the last 10 days. (Basic Rules, p. 105)
The corpse is not alive, it has "the semblance of life" and Intelligence. Intelligence is described as being the key attribute for memory.
The corpse knows only what it knew in life, including the languages
it knew.
Memory being required to recall what it knew in life fits Intelligence being magically activated.
Intelligence Measures: Mental acuity, information recall, analytical
skill (Basic Rules, p. 10)
Intelligence, measuring reasoning and memory(Basic Rules, p. 60)
bolding mine
The magic allows the otherwise dead corpse to answer your questions. Beyond that, the spell description doesn't activate, nor reanimate, anything else.
Your ruling was correct
You are the DM (per your comment). You ruled that the corpse could not read the scroll; your ruling captured the spell's powers correctly. If you want go beyond that at your table, it's your call.
Rules as Fun...
edited Feb 26 at 12:51
answered Feb 25 at 18:04
KorvinStarmastKorvinStarmast
82.3k19257444
82.3k19257444
$begingroup$
I am the DM, and during the session I ruled that the corpse could not read the scroll that the party was showing them. But after the session, the ruling I made felt unfinished. I need to make sure I took everything into account and didn't flub the ruling.
$endgroup$
– fiend
Feb 25 at 18:08
$begingroup$
@fiend OK, I'll remove that part.
$endgroup$
– KorvinStarmast
Feb 25 at 18:09
$begingroup$
The spell also mentions the target "recognizing you as an enemy," but doesn't go into the specifics (Sight? Sound? Language? Universal magic name tag?). How you rule on its ability to decipher photographs will tie in to how enemy recognition works.
$endgroup$
– AceCalhoon
Feb 25 at 20:06
1
$begingroup$
@AceCalhoon You've definitely got a question in there...:)
$endgroup$
– NautArch
Feb 25 at 21:58
2
$begingroup$
I've chosen this answer as it lines up best with how I ruled and interpreted the spell during my game. I think the handavy "magic" stuff makes the most sense, especially when you throw in the stuff about recognizing the caster as an enemy, it leads to the conclusion that the "magic" of the spell just establishes a connection to the corpse and the corpse is aware of who and what the caster is.
$endgroup$
– fiend
Feb 26 at 13:29
|
show 5 more comments
$begingroup$
I am the DM, and during the session I ruled that the corpse could not read the scroll that the party was showing them. But after the session, the ruling I made felt unfinished. I need to make sure I took everything into account and didn't flub the ruling.
$endgroup$
– fiend
Feb 25 at 18:08
$begingroup$
@fiend OK, I'll remove that part.
$endgroup$
– KorvinStarmast
Feb 25 at 18:09
$begingroup$
The spell also mentions the target "recognizing you as an enemy," but doesn't go into the specifics (Sight? Sound? Language? Universal magic name tag?). How you rule on its ability to decipher photographs will tie in to how enemy recognition works.
$endgroup$
– AceCalhoon
Feb 25 at 20:06
1
$begingroup$
@AceCalhoon You've definitely got a question in there...:)
$endgroup$
– NautArch
Feb 25 at 21:58
2
$begingroup$
I've chosen this answer as it lines up best with how I ruled and interpreted the spell during my game. I think the handavy "magic" stuff makes the most sense, especially when you throw in the stuff about recognizing the caster as an enemy, it leads to the conclusion that the "magic" of the spell just establishes a connection to the corpse and the corpse is aware of who and what the caster is.
$endgroup$
– fiend
Feb 26 at 13:29
$begingroup$
I am the DM, and during the session I ruled that the corpse could not read the scroll that the party was showing them. But after the session, the ruling I made felt unfinished. I need to make sure I took everything into account and didn't flub the ruling.
$endgroup$
– fiend
Feb 25 at 18:08
$begingroup$
I am the DM, and during the session I ruled that the corpse could not read the scroll that the party was showing them. But after the session, the ruling I made felt unfinished. I need to make sure I took everything into account and didn't flub the ruling.
$endgroup$
– fiend
Feb 25 at 18:08
$begingroup$
@fiend OK, I'll remove that part.
$endgroup$
– KorvinStarmast
Feb 25 at 18:09
$begingroup$
@fiend OK, I'll remove that part.
$endgroup$
– KorvinStarmast
Feb 25 at 18:09
$begingroup$
The spell also mentions the target "recognizing you as an enemy," but doesn't go into the specifics (Sight? Sound? Language? Universal magic name tag?). How you rule on its ability to decipher photographs will tie in to how enemy recognition works.
$endgroup$
– AceCalhoon
Feb 25 at 20:06
$begingroup$
The spell also mentions the target "recognizing you as an enemy," but doesn't go into the specifics (Sight? Sound? Language? Universal magic name tag?). How you rule on its ability to decipher photographs will tie in to how enemy recognition works.
$endgroup$
– AceCalhoon
Feb 25 at 20:06
1
1
$begingroup$
@AceCalhoon You've definitely got a question in there...:)
$endgroup$
– NautArch
Feb 25 at 21:58
$begingroup$
@AceCalhoon You've definitely got a question in there...:)
$endgroup$
– NautArch
Feb 25 at 21:58
2
2
$begingroup$
I've chosen this answer as it lines up best with how I ruled and interpreted the spell during my game. I think the handavy "magic" stuff makes the most sense, especially when you throw in the stuff about recognizing the caster as an enemy, it leads to the conclusion that the "magic" of the spell just establishes a connection to the corpse and the corpse is aware of who and what the caster is.
$endgroup$
– fiend
Feb 26 at 13:29
$begingroup$
I've chosen this answer as it lines up best with how I ruled and interpreted the spell during my game. I think the handavy "magic" stuff makes the most sense, especially when you throw in the stuff about recognizing the caster as an enemy, it leads to the conclusion that the "magic" of the spell just establishes a connection to the corpse and the corpse is aware of who and what the caster is.
$endgroup$
– fiend
Feb 26 at 13:29
|
show 5 more comments
$begingroup$
None
The corpse has no access to senses, including hearing. The caster magically has interactive access to its memories, but it has no access to its environment at all.
Speak with dead magically asks the questions of the corpse. It makes it seem alive again, but it says this is only a cosmetic seeming, not real (“the semblance of life and intelligence”). It doesn’t grant implied hearing—if it granted hearing it would say so explicitly, with something like, “restores hearing to the corpse for the duration”.
The spell lets the caster ask questions and get answers that the corpse knew in life. They can’t add anything to its knowledge and then ask it questions about what was(n’t) just added: it can’t be taught new things.
It is explicitly unaware of what’s happening during the spell:
the corpse can't learn new information, doesn't comprehend anything that has happened since it died
… including during the spell.
Only the magic of the spell allows the questions—only the questions—to penetrate. The spell basically magically extracts existing information from the corpse using an intuitive voice-activated interface, not actually allows the caster to deal with a thinking creature.
So:
The caster can ask it to describe a picture it knew in life. They can’t show it something it hasn’t seen before and ask questions about it.
The caster can ask what it remembers roses smell like. They can’t place a new flower under its dead nose and ask it questions about the new flower.
The caster can ask it what was written on a paper it knew in life. They can’t show it a new paper and ask questions about the new thing.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
None
The corpse has no access to senses, including hearing. The caster magically has interactive access to its memories, but it has no access to its environment at all.
Speak with dead magically asks the questions of the corpse. It makes it seem alive again, but it says this is only a cosmetic seeming, not real (“the semblance of life and intelligence”). It doesn’t grant implied hearing—if it granted hearing it would say so explicitly, with something like, “restores hearing to the corpse for the duration”.
The spell lets the caster ask questions and get answers that the corpse knew in life. They can’t add anything to its knowledge and then ask it questions about what was(n’t) just added: it can’t be taught new things.
It is explicitly unaware of what’s happening during the spell:
the corpse can't learn new information, doesn't comprehend anything that has happened since it died
… including during the spell.
Only the magic of the spell allows the questions—only the questions—to penetrate. The spell basically magically extracts existing information from the corpse using an intuitive voice-activated interface, not actually allows the caster to deal with a thinking creature.
So:
The caster can ask it to describe a picture it knew in life. They can’t show it something it hasn’t seen before and ask questions about it.
The caster can ask what it remembers roses smell like. They can’t place a new flower under its dead nose and ask it questions about the new flower.
The caster can ask it what was written on a paper it knew in life. They can’t show it a new paper and ask questions about the new thing.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
None
The corpse has no access to senses, including hearing. The caster magically has interactive access to its memories, but it has no access to its environment at all.
Speak with dead magically asks the questions of the corpse. It makes it seem alive again, but it says this is only a cosmetic seeming, not real (“the semblance of life and intelligence”). It doesn’t grant implied hearing—if it granted hearing it would say so explicitly, with something like, “restores hearing to the corpse for the duration”.
The spell lets the caster ask questions and get answers that the corpse knew in life. They can’t add anything to its knowledge and then ask it questions about what was(n’t) just added: it can’t be taught new things.
It is explicitly unaware of what’s happening during the spell:
the corpse can't learn new information, doesn't comprehend anything that has happened since it died
… including during the spell.
Only the magic of the spell allows the questions—only the questions—to penetrate. The spell basically magically extracts existing information from the corpse using an intuitive voice-activated interface, not actually allows the caster to deal with a thinking creature.
So:
The caster can ask it to describe a picture it knew in life. They can’t show it something it hasn’t seen before and ask questions about it.
The caster can ask what it remembers roses smell like. They can’t place a new flower under its dead nose and ask it questions about the new flower.
The caster can ask it what was written on a paper it knew in life. They can’t show it a new paper and ask questions about the new thing.
$endgroup$
None
The corpse has no access to senses, including hearing. The caster magically has interactive access to its memories, but it has no access to its environment at all.
Speak with dead magically asks the questions of the corpse. It makes it seem alive again, but it says this is only a cosmetic seeming, not real (“the semblance of life and intelligence”). It doesn’t grant implied hearing—if it granted hearing it would say so explicitly, with something like, “restores hearing to the corpse for the duration”.
The spell lets the caster ask questions and get answers that the corpse knew in life. They can’t add anything to its knowledge and then ask it questions about what was(n’t) just added: it can’t be taught new things.
It is explicitly unaware of what’s happening during the spell:
the corpse can't learn new information, doesn't comprehend anything that has happened since it died
… including during the spell.
Only the magic of the spell allows the questions—only the questions—to penetrate. The spell basically magically extracts existing information from the corpse using an intuitive voice-activated interface, not actually allows the caster to deal with a thinking creature.
So:
The caster can ask it to describe a picture it knew in life. They can’t show it something it hasn’t seen before and ask questions about it.
The caster can ask what it remembers roses smell like. They can’t place a new flower under its dead nose and ask it questions about the new flower.
The caster can ask it what was written on a paper it knew in life. They can’t show it a new paper and ask questions about the new thing.
edited Feb 25 at 18:22
answered Feb 25 at 18:16
SevenSidedDie♦SevenSidedDie
209k31669949
209k31669949
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Ask the DM
The spell description indicates that the corpse can speak. All other details are up to the DM. The fact that you can ask the corpse questions arguably implies that the corpse can hear (or that the spell allows you to transmit questions to it in some other way), but even this is up to interpretation.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Where does it say the corpse can hear?
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
Feb 25 at 18:28
$begingroup$
I suppose even that is up to interpretation, but you can ask it questions.
$endgroup$
– Harris M Snyder
Feb 25 at 18:30
$begingroup$
Answer updated to clarify.
$endgroup$
– Harris M Snyder
Feb 25 at 18:32
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Ask the DM
The spell description indicates that the corpse can speak. All other details are up to the DM. The fact that you can ask the corpse questions arguably implies that the corpse can hear (or that the spell allows you to transmit questions to it in some other way), but even this is up to interpretation.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Where does it say the corpse can hear?
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
Feb 25 at 18:28
$begingroup$
I suppose even that is up to interpretation, but you can ask it questions.
$endgroup$
– Harris M Snyder
Feb 25 at 18:30
$begingroup$
Answer updated to clarify.
$endgroup$
– Harris M Snyder
Feb 25 at 18:32
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Ask the DM
The spell description indicates that the corpse can speak. All other details are up to the DM. The fact that you can ask the corpse questions arguably implies that the corpse can hear (or that the spell allows you to transmit questions to it in some other way), but even this is up to interpretation.
$endgroup$
Ask the DM
The spell description indicates that the corpse can speak. All other details are up to the DM. The fact that you can ask the corpse questions arguably implies that the corpse can hear (or that the spell allows you to transmit questions to it in some other way), but even this is up to interpretation.
edited Feb 25 at 18:32
answered Feb 25 at 18:04
Harris M SnyderHarris M Snyder
56927
56927
$begingroup$
Where does it say the corpse can hear?
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
Feb 25 at 18:28
$begingroup$
I suppose even that is up to interpretation, but you can ask it questions.
$endgroup$
– Harris M Snyder
Feb 25 at 18:30
$begingroup$
Answer updated to clarify.
$endgroup$
– Harris M Snyder
Feb 25 at 18:32
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Where does it say the corpse can hear?
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
Feb 25 at 18:28
$begingroup$
I suppose even that is up to interpretation, but you can ask it questions.
$endgroup$
– Harris M Snyder
Feb 25 at 18:30
$begingroup$
Answer updated to clarify.
$endgroup$
– Harris M Snyder
Feb 25 at 18:32
$begingroup$
Where does it say the corpse can hear?
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
Feb 25 at 18:28
$begingroup$
Where does it say the corpse can hear?
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
Feb 25 at 18:28
$begingroup$
I suppose even that is up to interpretation, but you can ask it questions.
$endgroup$
– Harris M Snyder
Feb 25 at 18:30
$begingroup$
I suppose even that is up to interpretation, but you can ask it questions.
$endgroup$
– Harris M Snyder
Feb 25 at 18:30
$begingroup$
Answer updated to clarify.
$endgroup$
– Harris M Snyder
Feb 25 at 18:32
$begingroup$
Answer updated to clarify.
$endgroup$
– Harris M Snyder
Feb 25 at 18:32
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It can if it can see and knows the language
If the corpse still has it's eyes it should be able to see as the spell gives it a semblance of life and intelligence. If the scroll is written in a language that the creature knew in life it will be able to read it since that is knowledge it had in life.
The corpse not being able to learn won't prevent it from being able to read the contents of a scroll. It just won't be able to learn from the information in the scroll. For example if the scroll contains the BBEG's plans to retreat to their hidden base, you can't ask the corpse to guess where the base might be given the contents of the scroll. It can only tell you what it actually knew in life.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It can if it can see and knows the language
If the corpse still has it's eyes it should be able to see as the spell gives it a semblance of life and intelligence. If the scroll is written in a language that the creature knew in life it will be able to read it since that is knowledge it had in life.
The corpse not being able to learn won't prevent it from being able to read the contents of a scroll. It just won't be able to learn from the information in the scroll. For example if the scroll contains the BBEG's plans to retreat to their hidden base, you can't ask the corpse to guess where the base might be given the contents of the scroll. It can only tell you what it actually knew in life.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It can if it can see and knows the language
If the corpse still has it's eyes it should be able to see as the spell gives it a semblance of life and intelligence. If the scroll is written in a language that the creature knew in life it will be able to read it since that is knowledge it had in life.
The corpse not being able to learn won't prevent it from being able to read the contents of a scroll. It just won't be able to learn from the information in the scroll. For example if the scroll contains the BBEG's plans to retreat to their hidden base, you can't ask the corpse to guess where the base might be given the contents of the scroll. It can only tell you what it actually knew in life.
$endgroup$
It can if it can see and knows the language
If the corpse still has it's eyes it should be able to see as the spell gives it a semblance of life and intelligence. If the scroll is written in a language that the creature knew in life it will be able to read it since that is knowledge it had in life.
The corpse not being able to learn won't prevent it from being able to read the contents of a scroll. It just won't be able to learn from the information in the scroll. For example if the scroll contains the BBEG's plans to retreat to their hidden base, you can't ask the corpse to guess where the base might be given the contents of the scroll. It can only tell you what it actually knew in life.
answered Feb 26 at 6:10
Allan MillsAllan Mills
1,22615
1,22615
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f141914%2fwhat-senses-are-available-to-a-corpse-subjected-to-a-speak-with-dead-spell%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown