Kernel and image of matrix: What are they? Why do they exist?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP












2












$begingroup$


I've been trying to get an understanding of the Kernel of image of matrices. I'm studying them in college right now, but the problem is, while I can find a ton of resources on how to find them given a matrix by following steps, I haven't been able to find anything that explains what they are intuitively. Also why have them in the first place?



I hope someone who understands these concepts better can help me.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Usually, we say the "Null space" of matrix, rather than the "Kernel" of matrix. Also the "Column space" of matrix rather than "Image" of matrix. Kernel and Image are using while talking linear transformation.
    $endgroup$
    – Jade Pang
    Feb 25 at 6:58















2












$begingroup$


I've been trying to get an understanding of the Kernel of image of matrices. I'm studying them in college right now, but the problem is, while I can find a ton of resources on how to find them given a matrix by following steps, I haven't been able to find anything that explains what they are intuitively. Also why have them in the first place?



I hope someone who understands these concepts better can help me.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Usually, we say the "Null space" of matrix, rather than the "Kernel" of matrix. Also the "Column space" of matrix rather than "Image" of matrix. Kernel and Image are using while talking linear transformation.
    $endgroup$
    – Jade Pang
    Feb 25 at 6:58













2












2








2


1



$begingroup$


I've been trying to get an understanding of the Kernel of image of matrices. I'm studying them in college right now, but the problem is, while I can find a ton of resources on how to find them given a matrix by following steps, I haven't been able to find anything that explains what they are intuitively. Also why have them in the first place?



I hope someone who understands these concepts better can help me.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I've been trying to get an understanding of the Kernel of image of matrices. I'm studying them in college right now, but the problem is, while I can find a ton of resources on how to find them given a matrix by following steps, I haven't been able to find anything that explains what they are intuitively. Also why have them in the first place?



I hope someone who understands these concepts better can help me.







linear-algebra matrices definition intuition motivation






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Feb 25 at 6:56









GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會

14k82650




14k82650










asked Feb 25 at 6:51









EliorElior

153




153







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Usually, we say the "Null space" of matrix, rather than the "Kernel" of matrix. Also the "Column space" of matrix rather than "Image" of matrix. Kernel and Image are using while talking linear transformation.
    $endgroup$
    – Jade Pang
    Feb 25 at 6:58












  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Usually, we say the "Null space" of matrix, rather than the "Kernel" of matrix. Also the "Column space" of matrix rather than "Image" of matrix. Kernel and Image are using while talking linear transformation.
    $endgroup$
    – Jade Pang
    Feb 25 at 6:58







2




2




$begingroup$
Usually, we say the "Null space" of matrix, rather than the "Kernel" of matrix. Also the "Column space" of matrix rather than "Image" of matrix. Kernel and Image are using while talking linear transformation.
$endgroup$
– Jade Pang
Feb 25 at 6:58




$begingroup$
Usually, we say the "Null space" of matrix, rather than the "Kernel" of matrix. Also the "Column space" of matrix rather than "Image" of matrix. Kernel and Image are using while talking linear transformation.
$endgroup$
– Jade Pang
Feb 25 at 6:58










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















4












$begingroup$

The matrix corresponds to a linear function. Generally speaking, for a function $f:Xto Y$, the kernel of $f$ is $f^-1(0)$ and the image is $f(X)$.



Here $Y$ is a group, ring, field, vector space etc so it has a zero element $0in Y$.



Note the kernel $f^-1(0)$ is a subspace (subgroup, etc) of $X$ and the image $f(X)$ is a subspace of $Y$.



There is a nice sequence of maps
$$0toker fto Xto operatornameim fto Y.$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    So the kernel would be the whatever you need to input to 'f' in order to get 0 (or 0 vector)?
    $endgroup$
    – Elior
    Feb 25 at 7:06










  • $begingroup$
    @Elior : Precisely. It’s everything that gets mapped to zero.
    $endgroup$
    – MPW
    Feb 25 at 7:08










  • $begingroup$
    That makes sense. I'm a little confused by the sequence of maps at the end of you question (I may be interpreting it wrong). Is that showing the relationship between 0 and the ker(f), and then the ker(f) being part of the domain X, then same for im(f) being part of codomain. Why is there an arrow from X to im(f)? How does the domain relate to the image?
    $endgroup$
    – Elior
    Feb 25 at 7:14










  • $begingroup$
    The arrow you mention is the action of the map $f$ of $X$ onto its image. The arrows before and after that can be thought of as simple inclusion maps. Try googling “exact sequence” for more info.
    $endgroup$
    – MPW
    Feb 25 at 7:18


















0












$begingroup$

Well they exist because they kind of define the output given the input or if there is a unique solution of an inverse problem etc.



They both defines sets. Kernel defines a set of vectors such that take one of them and multiply it with your vector, you end up with 0 vector. Image on the other hand defines a "target set". Take any vector that can be multiplied with your matrix and multiply them. You cannot end up with a vector that does not belong to the image of your matrix.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    What is an example of a use for the kernel (in mathematics or any other field)?
    $endgroup$
    – Elior
    Feb 25 at 7:05










  • $begingroup$
    @Elior: First isomorphism theorem.
    $endgroup$
    – user21820
    Feb 25 at 9:47










Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3125714%2fkernel-and-image-of-matrix-what-are-they-why-do-they-exist%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









4












$begingroup$

The matrix corresponds to a linear function. Generally speaking, for a function $f:Xto Y$, the kernel of $f$ is $f^-1(0)$ and the image is $f(X)$.



Here $Y$ is a group, ring, field, vector space etc so it has a zero element $0in Y$.



Note the kernel $f^-1(0)$ is a subspace (subgroup, etc) of $X$ and the image $f(X)$ is a subspace of $Y$.



There is a nice sequence of maps
$$0toker fto Xto operatornameim fto Y.$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    So the kernel would be the whatever you need to input to 'f' in order to get 0 (or 0 vector)?
    $endgroup$
    – Elior
    Feb 25 at 7:06










  • $begingroup$
    @Elior : Precisely. It’s everything that gets mapped to zero.
    $endgroup$
    – MPW
    Feb 25 at 7:08










  • $begingroup$
    That makes sense. I'm a little confused by the sequence of maps at the end of you question (I may be interpreting it wrong). Is that showing the relationship between 0 and the ker(f), and then the ker(f) being part of the domain X, then same for im(f) being part of codomain. Why is there an arrow from X to im(f)? How does the domain relate to the image?
    $endgroup$
    – Elior
    Feb 25 at 7:14










  • $begingroup$
    The arrow you mention is the action of the map $f$ of $X$ onto its image. The arrows before and after that can be thought of as simple inclusion maps. Try googling “exact sequence” for more info.
    $endgroup$
    – MPW
    Feb 25 at 7:18















4












$begingroup$

The matrix corresponds to a linear function. Generally speaking, for a function $f:Xto Y$, the kernel of $f$ is $f^-1(0)$ and the image is $f(X)$.



Here $Y$ is a group, ring, field, vector space etc so it has a zero element $0in Y$.



Note the kernel $f^-1(0)$ is a subspace (subgroup, etc) of $X$ and the image $f(X)$ is a subspace of $Y$.



There is a nice sequence of maps
$$0toker fto Xto operatornameim fto Y.$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    So the kernel would be the whatever you need to input to 'f' in order to get 0 (or 0 vector)?
    $endgroup$
    – Elior
    Feb 25 at 7:06










  • $begingroup$
    @Elior : Precisely. It’s everything that gets mapped to zero.
    $endgroup$
    – MPW
    Feb 25 at 7:08










  • $begingroup$
    That makes sense. I'm a little confused by the sequence of maps at the end of you question (I may be interpreting it wrong). Is that showing the relationship between 0 and the ker(f), and then the ker(f) being part of the domain X, then same for im(f) being part of codomain. Why is there an arrow from X to im(f)? How does the domain relate to the image?
    $endgroup$
    – Elior
    Feb 25 at 7:14










  • $begingroup$
    The arrow you mention is the action of the map $f$ of $X$ onto its image. The arrows before and after that can be thought of as simple inclusion maps. Try googling “exact sequence” for more info.
    $endgroup$
    – MPW
    Feb 25 at 7:18













4












4








4





$begingroup$

The matrix corresponds to a linear function. Generally speaking, for a function $f:Xto Y$, the kernel of $f$ is $f^-1(0)$ and the image is $f(X)$.



Here $Y$ is a group, ring, field, vector space etc so it has a zero element $0in Y$.



Note the kernel $f^-1(0)$ is a subspace (subgroup, etc) of $X$ and the image $f(X)$ is a subspace of $Y$.



There is a nice sequence of maps
$$0toker fto Xto operatornameim fto Y.$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



The matrix corresponds to a linear function. Generally speaking, for a function $f:Xto Y$, the kernel of $f$ is $f^-1(0)$ and the image is $f(X)$.



Here $Y$ is a group, ring, field, vector space etc so it has a zero element $0in Y$.



Note the kernel $f^-1(0)$ is a subspace (subgroup, etc) of $X$ and the image $f(X)$ is a subspace of $Y$.



There is a nice sequence of maps
$$0toker fto Xto operatornameim fto Y.$$







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Feb 25 at 7:04

























answered Feb 25 at 6:55









MPWMPW

30.9k12157




30.9k12157











  • $begingroup$
    So the kernel would be the whatever you need to input to 'f' in order to get 0 (or 0 vector)?
    $endgroup$
    – Elior
    Feb 25 at 7:06










  • $begingroup$
    @Elior : Precisely. It’s everything that gets mapped to zero.
    $endgroup$
    – MPW
    Feb 25 at 7:08










  • $begingroup$
    That makes sense. I'm a little confused by the sequence of maps at the end of you question (I may be interpreting it wrong). Is that showing the relationship between 0 and the ker(f), and then the ker(f) being part of the domain X, then same for im(f) being part of codomain. Why is there an arrow from X to im(f)? How does the domain relate to the image?
    $endgroup$
    – Elior
    Feb 25 at 7:14










  • $begingroup$
    The arrow you mention is the action of the map $f$ of $X$ onto its image. The arrows before and after that can be thought of as simple inclusion maps. Try googling “exact sequence” for more info.
    $endgroup$
    – MPW
    Feb 25 at 7:18
















  • $begingroup$
    So the kernel would be the whatever you need to input to 'f' in order to get 0 (or 0 vector)?
    $endgroup$
    – Elior
    Feb 25 at 7:06










  • $begingroup$
    @Elior : Precisely. It’s everything that gets mapped to zero.
    $endgroup$
    – MPW
    Feb 25 at 7:08










  • $begingroup$
    That makes sense. I'm a little confused by the sequence of maps at the end of you question (I may be interpreting it wrong). Is that showing the relationship between 0 and the ker(f), and then the ker(f) being part of the domain X, then same for im(f) being part of codomain. Why is there an arrow from X to im(f)? How does the domain relate to the image?
    $endgroup$
    – Elior
    Feb 25 at 7:14










  • $begingroup$
    The arrow you mention is the action of the map $f$ of $X$ onto its image. The arrows before and after that can be thought of as simple inclusion maps. Try googling “exact sequence” for more info.
    $endgroup$
    – MPW
    Feb 25 at 7:18















$begingroup$
So the kernel would be the whatever you need to input to 'f' in order to get 0 (or 0 vector)?
$endgroup$
– Elior
Feb 25 at 7:06




$begingroup$
So the kernel would be the whatever you need to input to 'f' in order to get 0 (or 0 vector)?
$endgroup$
– Elior
Feb 25 at 7:06












$begingroup$
@Elior : Precisely. It’s everything that gets mapped to zero.
$endgroup$
– MPW
Feb 25 at 7:08




$begingroup$
@Elior : Precisely. It’s everything that gets mapped to zero.
$endgroup$
– MPW
Feb 25 at 7:08












$begingroup$
That makes sense. I'm a little confused by the sequence of maps at the end of you question (I may be interpreting it wrong). Is that showing the relationship between 0 and the ker(f), and then the ker(f) being part of the domain X, then same for im(f) being part of codomain. Why is there an arrow from X to im(f)? How does the domain relate to the image?
$endgroup$
– Elior
Feb 25 at 7:14




$begingroup$
That makes sense. I'm a little confused by the sequence of maps at the end of you question (I may be interpreting it wrong). Is that showing the relationship between 0 and the ker(f), and then the ker(f) being part of the domain X, then same for im(f) being part of codomain. Why is there an arrow from X to im(f)? How does the domain relate to the image?
$endgroup$
– Elior
Feb 25 at 7:14












$begingroup$
The arrow you mention is the action of the map $f$ of $X$ onto its image. The arrows before and after that can be thought of as simple inclusion maps. Try googling “exact sequence” for more info.
$endgroup$
– MPW
Feb 25 at 7:18




$begingroup$
The arrow you mention is the action of the map $f$ of $X$ onto its image. The arrows before and after that can be thought of as simple inclusion maps. Try googling “exact sequence” for more info.
$endgroup$
– MPW
Feb 25 at 7:18











0












$begingroup$

Well they exist because they kind of define the output given the input or if there is a unique solution of an inverse problem etc.



They both defines sets. Kernel defines a set of vectors such that take one of them and multiply it with your vector, you end up with 0 vector. Image on the other hand defines a "target set". Take any vector that can be multiplied with your matrix and multiply them. You cannot end up with a vector that does not belong to the image of your matrix.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    What is an example of a use for the kernel (in mathematics or any other field)?
    $endgroup$
    – Elior
    Feb 25 at 7:05










  • $begingroup$
    @Elior: First isomorphism theorem.
    $endgroup$
    – user21820
    Feb 25 at 9:47















0












$begingroup$

Well they exist because they kind of define the output given the input or if there is a unique solution of an inverse problem etc.



They both defines sets. Kernel defines a set of vectors such that take one of them and multiply it with your vector, you end up with 0 vector. Image on the other hand defines a "target set". Take any vector that can be multiplied with your matrix and multiply them. You cannot end up with a vector that does not belong to the image of your matrix.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    What is an example of a use for the kernel (in mathematics or any other field)?
    $endgroup$
    – Elior
    Feb 25 at 7:05










  • $begingroup$
    @Elior: First isomorphism theorem.
    $endgroup$
    – user21820
    Feb 25 at 9:47













0












0








0





$begingroup$

Well they exist because they kind of define the output given the input or if there is a unique solution of an inverse problem etc.



They both defines sets. Kernel defines a set of vectors such that take one of them and multiply it with your vector, you end up with 0 vector. Image on the other hand defines a "target set". Take any vector that can be multiplied with your matrix and multiply them. You cannot end up with a vector that does not belong to the image of your matrix.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Well they exist because they kind of define the output given the input or if there is a unique solution of an inverse problem etc.



They both defines sets. Kernel defines a set of vectors such that take one of them and multiply it with your vector, you end up with 0 vector. Image on the other hand defines a "target set". Take any vector that can be multiplied with your matrix and multiply them. You cannot end up with a vector that does not belong to the image of your matrix.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Feb 25 at 7:00









starhdstarhd

11




11











  • $begingroup$
    What is an example of a use for the kernel (in mathematics or any other field)?
    $endgroup$
    – Elior
    Feb 25 at 7:05










  • $begingroup$
    @Elior: First isomorphism theorem.
    $endgroup$
    – user21820
    Feb 25 at 9:47
















  • $begingroup$
    What is an example of a use for the kernel (in mathematics or any other field)?
    $endgroup$
    – Elior
    Feb 25 at 7:05










  • $begingroup$
    @Elior: First isomorphism theorem.
    $endgroup$
    – user21820
    Feb 25 at 9:47















$begingroup$
What is an example of a use for the kernel (in mathematics or any other field)?
$endgroup$
– Elior
Feb 25 at 7:05




$begingroup$
What is an example of a use for the kernel (in mathematics or any other field)?
$endgroup$
– Elior
Feb 25 at 7:05












$begingroup$
@Elior: First isomorphism theorem.
$endgroup$
– user21820
Feb 25 at 9:47




$begingroup$
@Elior: First isomorphism theorem.
$endgroup$
– user21820
Feb 25 at 9:47

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3125714%2fkernel-and-image-of-matrix-what-are-they-why-do-they-exist%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown






Popular posts from this blog

How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

Bahrain

Postfix configuration issue with fips on centos 7; mailgun relay