Computing Cardinality of Sumsets using Convolutions and FFT
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
$begingroup$
I read somewhere that you can compute the cardinality of sumsets by computing the convolutions of the characteristic vectors of the given sets, and that this can be done efficiently using Fast Fourier Transform. How would this work?
algorithms
asked Feb 25 at 4:28
Arnaud AvondetArnaud Avondet
83
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I read somewhere that you can compute the cardinality of sumsets by computing the convolutions of the characteristic vectors of the given sets, and that this can be done efficiently using Fast Fourier Transform. How would this work?
algorithms
asked Feb 25 at 4:28
Arnaud AvondetArnaud Avondet
83
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I read somewhere that you can compute the cardinality of sumsets by computing the convolutions of the characteristic vectors of the given sets, and that this can be done efficiently using Fast Fourier Transform. How would this work?
algorithms
asked Feb 25 at 4:28
Arnaud AvondetArnaud Avondet
83
$endgroup$
I read somewhere that you can compute the cardinality of sumsets by computing the convolutions of the characteristic vectors of the given sets, and that this can be done efficiently using Fast Fourier Transform. How would this work?
algorithms
algorithms
asked Feb 25 at 4:28
Arnaud AvondetArnaud Avondet
83
asked Feb 25 at 4:28
Arnaud AvondetArnaud Avondet
83
asked Feb 25 at 4:28
Arnaud AvondetArnaud Avondet
83
asked Feb 25 at 4:28
Arnaud AvondetArnaud Avondet
83
asked Feb 25 at 4:28
Arnaud AvondetArnaud Avondet
83
83
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Here is a sketch of the main ideas. Let $S,T subseteq mathbbN$ be two multisets of non-negative integers, and define $S+T$ to be the multiset
$$S+T = s+t mid s in S, t in T.$$
Let $chi_S$ represent the characteristic vector of a set $S$. Then
$$chi_S+T = chi_S * chi_T,$$
where $*$ is a convolution operator.
The Fourier transform $mathcalF$ has the property that
$$mathcalF(f*g) = mathcalF(f) times mathcalF(g),$$
where $times$ represents pointwise multiplication of functions. Therefore,
$$mathcalF(chi_S+T) = mathcalF(chi_S) times mathcalF(chi_T),$$
and in particular,
$$chi_S+T = mathcalF^-1(mathcalF(chi_S) times mathcalF(chi_T)).$$
This gives us a method to compute $S+T$. We can compute the characteristic vector $chi_S+T$ for the multiset $S+T$ by computing $mathcalF(chi_S)$, the Fourier transform of the characteristic vector for $S$, and $mathcalF(g)$; multiplying them; and then applying the inverse Fourier transform to the result. Each of these steps can be implemented efficiently using the Fast Fourier transform. The end result will be $chi_S+T$, from which we can reconstruct $S+T$ or its cardinality.
The overall running time will be $O(n log n)$, where $n$ is an upper bound on the largest element of $S,T$.
answered Feb 25 at 5:52
D.W.♦D.W.
102k12127291
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "419"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcs.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f104817%2fcomputing-cardinality-of-sumsets-using-convolutions-and-fft%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Here is a sketch of the main ideas. Let $S,T subseteq mathbbN$ be two multisets of non-negative integers, and define $S+T$ to be the multiset
$$S+T = s+t mid s in S, t in T.$$
Let $chi_S$ represent the characteristic vector of a set $S$. Then
$$chi_S+T = chi_S * chi_T,$$
where $*$ is a convolution operator.
The Fourier transform $mathcalF$ has the property that
$$mathcalF(f*g) = mathcalF(f) times mathcalF(g),$$
where $times$ represents pointwise multiplication of functions. Therefore,
$$mathcalF(chi_S+T) = mathcalF(chi_S) times mathcalF(chi_T),$$
and in particular,
$$chi_S+T = mathcalF^-1(mathcalF(chi_S) times mathcalF(chi_T)).$$
This gives us a method to compute $S+T$. We can compute the characteristic vector $chi_S+T$ for the multiset $S+T$ by computing $mathcalF(chi_S)$, the Fourier transform of the characteristic vector for $S$, and $mathcalF(g)$; multiplying them; and then applying the inverse Fourier transform to the result. Each of these steps can be implemented efficiently using the Fast Fourier transform. The end result will be $chi_S+T$, from which we can reconstruct $S+T$ or its cardinality.
The overall running time will be $O(n log n)$, where $n$ is an upper bound on the largest element of $S,T$.
answered Feb 25 at 5:52
D.W.♦D.W.
102k12127291
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here is a sketch of the main ideas. Let $S,T subseteq mathbbN$ be two multisets of non-negative integers, and define $S+T$ to be the multiset
$$S+T = s+t mid s in S, t in T.$$
Let $chi_S$ represent the characteristic vector of a set $S$. Then
$$chi_S+T = chi_S * chi_T,$$
where $*$ is a convolution operator.
The Fourier transform $mathcalF$ has the property that
$$mathcalF(f*g) = mathcalF(f) times mathcalF(g),$$
where $times$ represents pointwise multiplication of functions. Therefore,
$$mathcalF(chi_S+T) = mathcalF(chi_S) times mathcalF(chi_T),$$
and in particular,
$$chi_S+T = mathcalF^-1(mathcalF(chi_S) times mathcalF(chi_T)).$$
This gives us a method to compute $S+T$. We can compute the characteristic vector $chi_S+T$ for the multiset $S+T$ by computing $mathcalF(chi_S)$, the Fourier transform of the characteristic vector for $S$, and $mathcalF(g)$; multiplying them; and then applying the inverse Fourier transform to the result. Each of these steps can be implemented efficiently using the Fast Fourier transform. The end result will be $chi_S+T$, from which we can reconstruct $S+T$ or its cardinality.
The overall running time will be $O(n log n)$, where $n$ is an upper bound on the largest element of $S,T$.
answered Feb 25 at 5:52
D.W.♦D.W.
102k12127291
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here is a sketch of the main ideas. Let $S,T subseteq mathbbN$ be two multisets of non-negative integers, and define $S+T$ to be the multiset
$$S+T = s+t mid s in S, t in T.$$
Let $chi_S$ represent the characteristic vector of a set $S$. Then
$$chi_S+T = chi_S * chi_T,$$
where $*$ is a convolution operator.
The Fourier transform $mathcalF$ has the property that
$$mathcalF(f*g) = mathcalF(f) times mathcalF(g),$$
where $times$ represents pointwise multiplication of functions. Therefore,
$$mathcalF(chi_S+T) = mathcalF(chi_S) times mathcalF(chi_T),$$
and in particular,
$$chi_S+T = mathcalF^-1(mathcalF(chi_S) times mathcalF(chi_T)).$$
This gives us a method to compute $S+T$. We can compute the characteristic vector $chi_S+T$ for the multiset $S+T$ by computing $mathcalF(chi_S)$, the Fourier transform of the characteristic vector for $S$, and $mathcalF(g)$; multiplying them; and then applying the inverse Fourier transform to the result. Each of these steps can be implemented efficiently using the Fast Fourier transform. The end result will be $chi_S+T$, from which we can reconstruct $S+T$ or its cardinality.
The overall running time will be $O(n log n)$, where $n$ is an upper bound on the largest element of $S,T$.
answered Feb 25 at 5:52
D.W.♦D.W.
102k12127291
$endgroup$
Here is a sketch of the main ideas. Let $S,T subseteq mathbbN$ be two multisets of non-negative integers, and define $S+T$ to be the multiset
$$S+T = s+t mid s in S, t in T.$$
Let $chi_S$ represent the characteristic vector of a set $S$. Then
$$chi_S+T = chi_S * chi_T,$$
where $*$ is a convolution operator.
The Fourier transform $mathcalF$ has the property that
$$mathcalF(f*g) = mathcalF(f) times mathcalF(g),$$
where $times$ represents pointwise multiplication of functions. Therefore,
$$mathcalF(chi_S+T) = mathcalF(chi_S) times mathcalF(chi_T),$$
and in particular,
$$chi_S+T = mathcalF^-1(mathcalF(chi_S) times mathcalF(chi_T)).$$
This gives us a method to compute $S+T$. We can compute the characteristic vector $chi_S+T$ for the multiset $S+T$ by computing $mathcalF(chi_S)$, the Fourier transform of the characteristic vector for $S$, and $mathcalF(g)$; multiplying them; and then applying the inverse Fourier transform to the result. Each of these steps can be implemented efficiently using the Fast Fourier transform. The end result will be $chi_S+T$, from which we can reconstruct $S+T$ or its cardinality.
The overall running time will be $O(n log n)$, where $n$ is an upper bound on the largest element of $S,T$.
answered Feb 25 at 5:52
D.W.♦D.W.
102k12127291
answered Feb 25 at 5:52
D.W.♦D.W.
102k12127291
answered Feb 25 at 5:52
D.W.♦D.W.
102k12127291
answered Feb 25 at 5:52
D.W.♦D.W.
102k12127291
102k12127291
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Computer Science Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcs.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f104817%2fcomputing-cardinality-of-sumsets-using-convolutions-and-fft%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
