Issue with loopback devices in Docker

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP












0















I'm trying to build a virtual disk image in Docker.
I'm able to create my empty file with dd and create the partitions with parted but once I try to make my filesystem it fails saying the device could not be found. In the Docker container I'm running as root and I've passed --privileged=true to docker run.



This works outside of docker and works in Docker on my local machine. It's only failing on my build server (AWS elastic agent).



Here is a section of the output showing that the block device exist before the call to make the filesystem.



28-Feb-2019 10:39:33 +./scripts/make.sh:105> ls -l /dev/loop2 /dev/loop2p1 /dev/loop2p2
28-Feb-2019 10:39:33 brwxrwxrwx 1 root disk 7, 2 Feb 28 15:39 /dev/loop2
28-Feb-2019 10:39:33 brwxrwxrwx 1 root disk 259, 8 Feb 28 15:39 /dev/loop2p1
28-Feb-2019 10:39:33 brwxrwxrwx 1 root disk 259, 9 Feb 28 15:39 /dev/loop2p2
28-Feb-2019 10:39:33 +./scripts/make.sh:108> mkfs.vfat -n boot /dev/loop2p1
28-Feb-2019 10:39:33 mkfs.fat 3.0.28 (2015-05-16)
28-Feb-2019 10:39:33 /dev/loop2p1: No such device or address


And the section of the script:



## Create zero'd file
dd if=/dev/zero of=disk.img bs=1M count=400

## Find next available loop device
local lodev=$(losetup -f)

## Have flat file look like a block device
ls -l $lodev*
losetup $lodev disk.img

## Create partition table and partition
parted -s -a optimal $lodev mklabel msdos
parted -s -a optimal -- $lodev unit compact mkpart primary "10" "20"
parted -s -a optimal -- $lodev unit compact mkpart primary "21" "-1"
parted -s $lodev set 1 boot on
ls -l $lodev*

## Create filesystem
mkfs.vfat -n boot $lodevp1
mkfs.ext3 -L rootfs $lodevp2


Any ideas why mkfs.fat thinks the block device does not exist when it looks like it does?










share|improve this question






















  • You don't need --privileged you can use --device mapping. See docs.docker.com/storage/storagedriver/device-mapper-driver

    – ctrl-alt-delor
    Feb 28 at 16:42











  • This would require the devices to be created and setup before entering the container, which is half of what this script does when creating the virtual image.

    – dangeroushobo
    Feb 28 at 18:09















0















I'm trying to build a virtual disk image in Docker.
I'm able to create my empty file with dd and create the partitions with parted but once I try to make my filesystem it fails saying the device could not be found. In the Docker container I'm running as root and I've passed --privileged=true to docker run.



This works outside of docker and works in Docker on my local machine. It's only failing on my build server (AWS elastic agent).



Here is a section of the output showing that the block device exist before the call to make the filesystem.



28-Feb-2019 10:39:33 +./scripts/make.sh:105> ls -l /dev/loop2 /dev/loop2p1 /dev/loop2p2
28-Feb-2019 10:39:33 brwxrwxrwx 1 root disk 7, 2 Feb 28 15:39 /dev/loop2
28-Feb-2019 10:39:33 brwxrwxrwx 1 root disk 259, 8 Feb 28 15:39 /dev/loop2p1
28-Feb-2019 10:39:33 brwxrwxrwx 1 root disk 259, 9 Feb 28 15:39 /dev/loop2p2
28-Feb-2019 10:39:33 +./scripts/make.sh:108> mkfs.vfat -n boot /dev/loop2p1
28-Feb-2019 10:39:33 mkfs.fat 3.0.28 (2015-05-16)
28-Feb-2019 10:39:33 /dev/loop2p1: No such device or address


And the section of the script:



## Create zero'd file
dd if=/dev/zero of=disk.img bs=1M count=400

## Find next available loop device
local lodev=$(losetup -f)

## Have flat file look like a block device
ls -l $lodev*
losetup $lodev disk.img

## Create partition table and partition
parted -s -a optimal $lodev mklabel msdos
parted -s -a optimal -- $lodev unit compact mkpart primary "10" "20"
parted -s -a optimal -- $lodev unit compact mkpart primary "21" "-1"
parted -s $lodev set 1 boot on
ls -l $lodev*

## Create filesystem
mkfs.vfat -n boot $lodevp1
mkfs.ext3 -L rootfs $lodevp2


Any ideas why mkfs.fat thinks the block device does not exist when it looks like it does?










share|improve this question






















  • You don't need --privileged you can use --device mapping. See docs.docker.com/storage/storagedriver/device-mapper-driver

    – ctrl-alt-delor
    Feb 28 at 16:42











  • This would require the devices to be created and setup before entering the container, which is half of what this script does when creating the virtual image.

    – dangeroushobo
    Feb 28 at 18:09













0












0








0








I'm trying to build a virtual disk image in Docker.
I'm able to create my empty file with dd and create the partitions with parted but once I try to make my filesystem it fails saying the device could not be found. In the Docker container I'm running as root and I've passed --privileged=true to docker run.



This works outside of docker and works in Docker on my local machine. It's only failing on my build server (AWS elastic agent).



Here is a section of the output showing that the block device exist before the call to make the filesystem.



28-Feb-2019 10:39:33 +./scripts/make.sh:105> ls -l /dev/loop2 /dev/loop2p1 /dev/loop2p2
28-Feb-2019 10:39:33 brwxrwxrwx 1 root disk 7, 2 Feb 28 15:39 /dev/loop2
28-Feb-2019 10:39:33 brwxrwxrwx 1 root disk 259, 8 Feb 28 15:39 /dev/loop2p1
28-Feb-2019 10:39:33 brwxrwxrwx 1 root disk 259, 9 Feb 28 15:39 /dev/loop2p2
28-Feb-2019 10:39:33 +./scripts/make.sh:108> mkfs.vfat -n boot /dev/loop2p1
28-Feb-2019 10:39:33 mkfs.fat 3.0.28 (2015-05-16)
28-Feb-2019 10:39:33 /dev/loop2p1: No such device or address


And the section of the script:



## Create zero'd file
dd if=/dev/zero of=disk.img bs=1M count=400

## Find next available loop device
local lodev=$(losetup -f)

## Have flat file look like a block device
ls -l $lodev*
losetup $lodev disk.img

## Create partition table and partition
parted -s -a optimal $lodev mklabel msdos
parted -s -a optimal -- $lodev unit compact mkpart primary "10" "20"
parted -s -a optimal -- $lodev unit compact mkpart primary "21" "-1"
parted -s $lodev set 1 boot on
ls -l $lodev*

## Create filesystem
mkfs.vfat -n boot $lodevp1
mkfs.ext3 -L rootfs $lodevp2


Any ideas why mkfs.fat thinks the block device does not exist when it looks like it does?










share|improve this question














I'm trying to build a virtual disk image in Docker.
I'm able to create my empty file with dd and create the partitions with parted but once I try to make my filesystem it fails saying the device could not be found. In the Docker container I'm running as root and I've passed --privileged=true to docker run.



This works outside of docker and works in Docker on my local machine. It's only failing on my build server (AWS elastic agent).



Here is a section of the output showing that the block device exist before the call to make the filesystem.



28-Feb-2019 10:39:33 +./scripts/make.sh:105> ls -l /dev/loop2 /dev/loop2p1 /dev/loop2p2
28-Feb-2019 10:39:33 brwxrwxrwx 1 root disk 7, 2 Feb 28 15:39 /dev/loop2
28-Feb-2019 10:39:33 brwxrwxrwx 1 root disk 259, 8 Feb 28 15:39 /dev/loop2p1
28-Feb-2019 10:39:33 brwxrwxrwx 1 root disk 259, 9 Feb 28 15:39 /dev/loop2p2
28-Feb-2019 10:39:33 +./scripts/make.sh:108> mkfs.vfat -n boot /dev/loop2p1
28-Feb-2019 10:39:33 mkfs.fat 3.0.28 (2015-05-16)
28-Feb-2019 10:39:33 /dev/loop2p1: No such device or address


And the section of the script:



## Create zero'd file
dd if=/dev/zero of=disk.img bs=1M count=400

## Find next available loop device
local lodev=$(losetup -f)

## Have flat file look like a block device
ls -l $lodev*
losetup $lodev disk.img

## Create partition table and partition
parted -s -a optimal $lodev mklabel msdos
parted -s -a optimal -- $lodev unit compact mkpart primary "10" "20"
parted -s -a optimal -- $lodev unit compact mkpart primary "21" "-1"
parted -s $lodev set 1 boot on
ls -l $lodev*

## Create filesystem
mkfs.vfat -n boot $lodevp1
mkfs.ext3 -L rootfs $lodevp2


Any ideas why mkfs.fat thinks the block device does not exist when it looks like it does?







docker loop-device






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Feb 28 at 15:56









dangeroushobodangeroushobo

151110




151110












  • You don't need --privileged you can use --device mapping. See docs.docker.com/storage/storagedriver/device-mapper-driver

    – ctrl-alt-delor
    Feb 28 at 16:42











  • This would require the devices to be created and setup before entering the container, which is half of what this script does when creating the virtual image.

    – dangeroushobo
    Feb 28 at 18:09

















  • You don't need --privileged you can use --device mapping. See docs.docker.com/storage/storagedriver/device-mapper-driver

    – ctrl-alt-delor
    Feb 28 at 16:42











  • This would require the devices to be created and setup before entering the container, which is half of what this script does when creating the virtual image.

    – dangeroushobo
    Feb 28 at 18:09
















You don't need --privileged you can use --device mapping. See docs.docker.com/storage/storagedriver/device-mapper-driver

– ctrl-alt-delor
Feb 28 at 16:42





You don't need --privileged you can use --device mapping. See docs.docker.com/storage/storagedriver/device-mapper-driver

– ctrl-alt-delor
Feb 28 at 16:42













This would require the devices to be created and setup before entering the container, which is half of what this script does when creating the virtual image.

– dangeroushobo
Feb 28 at 18:09





This would require the devices to be created and setup before entering the container, which is half of what this script does when creating the virtual image.

– dangeroushobo
Feb 28 at 18:09










0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f503578%2fissue-with-loopback-devices-in-docker%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f503578%2fissue-with-loopback-devices-in-docker%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown






Popular posts from this blog

How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

Displaying single band from multi-band raster using QGIS

How many registers does an x86_64 CPU actually have?