Does SQL Server 2017, including older versions, support 8k disk sector sizes?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
Disk (loosely worded to include not only rotational media but non-rotational media [SSD, NVMe, etc.]) drives are continuing to evolve in their underlying formats and hardware. Part of this was an "enhancement" from 512 byte physical sector sizes to 4k physical sector sizes, which changes the on disk layout (512n, 512e, 4kn).
This next evolution is in using 8k physical sector sizes, which some manufacturers are starting to produce and setup in production. Given this next step, is the 8k sector size disk supported in Windows? Does SQL Server care about sector sizes?
sql-server hardware
edited Feb 28 at 18:55
Josh Darnell
7,22522141
asked Feb 28 at 16:28
Sean GallardySean Gallardy
16.9k22654
add a comment |
Disk (loosely worded to include not only rotational media but non-rotational media [SSD, NVMe, etc.]) drives are continuing to evolve in their underlying formats and hardware. Part of this was an "enhancement" from 512 byte physical sector sizes to 4k physical sector sizes, which changes the on disk layout (512n, 512e, 4kn).
This next evolution is in using 8k physical sector sizes, which some manufacturers are starting to produce and setup in production. Given this next step, is the 8k sector size disk supported in Windows? Does SQL Server care about sector sizes?
sql-server hardware
edited Feb 28 at 18:55
Josh Darnell
7,22522141
asked Feb 28 at 16:28
Sean GallardySean Gallardy
16.9k22654
add a comment |
Disk (loosely worded to include not only rotational media but non-rotational media [SSD, NVMe, etc.]) drives are continuing to evolve in their underlying formats and hardware. Part of this was an "enhancement" from 512 byte physical sector sizes to 4k physical sector sizes, which changes the on disk layout (512n, 512e, 4kn).
This next evolution is in using 8k physical sector sizes, which some manufacturers are starting to produce and setup in production. Given this next step, is the 8k sector size disk supported in Windows? Does SQL Server care about sector sizes?
sql-server hardware
edited Feb 28 at 18:55
Josh Darnell
7,22522141
asked Feb 28 at 16:28
Sean GallardySean Gallardy
16.9k22654
Disk (loosely worded to include not only rotational media but non-rotational media [SSD, NVMe, etc.]) drives are continuing to evolve in their underlying formats and hardware. Part of this was an "enhancement" from 512 byte physical sector sizes to 4k physical sector sizes, which changes the on disk layout (512n, 512e, 4kn).
This next evolution is in using 8k physical sector sizes, which some manufacturers are starting to produce and setup in production. Given this next step, is the 8k sector size disk supported in Windows? Does SQL Server care about sector sizes?
sql-server hardware
sql-server hardware
edited Feb 28 at 18:55
Josh Darnell
7,22522141
asked Feb 28 at 16:28
Sean GallardySean Gallardy
16.9k22654
edited Feb 28 at 18:55
Josh Darnell
7,22522141
asked Feb 28 at 16:28
Sean GallardySean Gallardy
16.9k22654
edited Feb 28 at 18:55
Josh Darnell
7,22522141
edited Feb 28 at 18:55
Josh Darnell
7,22522141
edited Feb 28 at 18:55
Josh Darnell
7,22522141
7,22522141
asked Feb 28 at 16:28
Sean GallardySean Gallardy
16.9k22654
asked Feb 28 at 16:28
Sean GallardySean Gallardy
16.9k22654
asked Feb 28 at 16:28
Sean GallardySean Gallardy
16.9k22654
16.9k22654
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Is the 8k sector size disk supported in Windows?
Currently, no, it is not supported by Windows and has been documented.
Does SQL Server care about sector sizes?
Yes, SQL Server does care about sector sizes. In fact, SQL Server checks the underlying physical disk information as it has data structures and algorithms that work with current disk sector sizes for various reasons (data integrity, optimizations, etc.).
If you attempt to use a physical sector size above 4k (4096) you'll receive an error:
Msg 5179, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
Cannot use file 'S:FolderTestDB.mdf ', because it is on a volume with sector size 8192.
SQL Server supports a maximum sector size of 4096 bytes.
Move the file to a volume with a compatible sector size.
In this case, you can see that the error message is specifically telling you that the maximum sector size is 4096 (4k). This means that volume can't be used for SQL Server, and as noted above it wouldn't be supported in Windows either.
Solution
If you're receiving this error/issue, unfortunately you'll need to use a supported disk sector size such as 512 bytes or 4k. Other formats are unsupported and can't be used. You'll need to contact your hardware vendor for the Disk subsystem used and ask if there are any other options.
As eckes mentioned in a comment, on Linux you can emulate a 8k drive with the new logical blocksize option of losetup -b with 4.14 kernels.
edited Mar 2 at 5:13
Paul White♦
53.8k14286459
answered Feb 28 at 16:28
Sean GallardySean Gallardy
16.9k22654
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "182"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f230973%2fdoes-sql-server-2017-including-older-versions-support-8k-disk-sector-sizes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Is the 8k sector size disk supported in Windows?
Currently, no, it is not supported by Windows and has been documented.
Does SQL Server care about sector sizes?
Yes, SQL Server does care about sector sizes. In fact, SQL Server checks the underlying physical disk information as it has data structures and algorithms that work with current disk sector sizes for various reasons (data integrity, optimizations, etc.).
If you attempt to use a physical sector size above 4k (4096) you'll receive an error:
Msg 5179, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
Cannot use file 'S:FolderTestDB.mdf ', because it is on a volume with sector size 8192.
SQL Server supports a maximum sector size of 4096 bytes.
Move the file to a volume with a compatible sector size.
In this case, you can see that the error message is specifically telling you that the maximum sector size is 4096 (4k). This means that volume can't be used for SQL Server, and as noted above it wouldn't be supported in Windows either.
Solution
If you're receiving this error/issue, unfortunately you'll need to use a supported disk sector size such as 512 bytes or 4k. Other formats are unsupported and can't be used. You'll need to contact your hardware vendor for the Disk subsystem used and ask if there are any other options.
As eckes mentioned in a comment, on Linux you can emulate a 8k drive with the new logical blocksize option of losetup -b with 4.14 kernels.
edited Mar 2 at 5:13
Paul White♦
53.8k14286459
answered Feb 28 at 16:28
Sean GallardySean Gallardy
16.9k22654
add a comment |
Is the 8k sector size disk supported in Windows?
Currently, no, it is not supported by Windows and has been documented.
Does SQL Server care about sector sizes?
Yes, SQL Server does care about sector sizes. In fact, SQL Server checks the underlying physical disk information as it has data structures and algorithms that work with current disk sector sizes for various reasons (data integrity, optimizations, etc.).
If you attempt to use a physical sector size above 4k (4096) you'll receive an error:
Msg 5179, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
Cannot use file 'S:FolderTestDB.mdf ', because it is on a volume with sector size 8192.
SQL Server supports a maximum sector size of 4096 bytes.
Move the file to a volume with a compatible sector size.
In this case, you can see that the error message is specifically telling you that the maximum sector size is 4096 (4k). This means that volume can't be used for SQL Server, and as noted above it wouldn't be supported in Windows either.
Solution
If you're receiving this error/issue, unfortunately you'll need to use a supported disk sector size such as 512 bytes or 4k. Other formats are unsupported and can't be used. You'll need to contact your hardware vendor for the Disk subsystem used and ask if there are any other options.
As eckes mentioned in a comment, on Linux you can emulate a 8k drive with the new logical blocksize option of losetup -b with 4.14 kernels.
edited Mar 2 at 5:13
Paul White♦
53.8k14286459
answered Feb 28 at 16:28
Sean GallardySean Gallardy
16.9k22654
add a comment |
Is the 8k sector size disk supported in Windows?
Currently, no, it is not supported by Windows and has been documented.
Does SQL Server care about sector sizes?
Yes, SQL Server does care about sector sizes. In fact, SQL Server checks the underlying physical disk information as it has data structures and algorithms that work with current disk sector sizes for various reasons (data integrity, optimizations, etc.).
If you attempt to use a physical sector size above 4k (4096) you'll receive an error:
Msg 5179, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
Cannot use file 'S:FolderTestDB.mdf ', because it is on a volume with sector size 8192.
SQL Server supports a maximum sector size of 4096 bytes.
Move the file to a volume with a compatible sector size.
In this case, you can see that the error message is specifically telling you that the maximum sector size is 4096 (4k). This means that volume can't be used for SQL Server, and as noted above it wouldn't be supported in Windows either.
Solution
If you're receiving this error/issue, unfortunately you'll need to use a supported disk sector size such as 512 bytes or 4k. Other formats are unsupported and can't be used. You'll need to contact your hardware vendor for the Disk subsystem used and ask if there are any other options.
As eckes mentioned in a comment, on Linux you can emulate a 8k drive with the new logical blocksize option of losetup -b with 4.14 kernels.
edited Mar 2 at 5:13
Paul White♦
53.8k14286459
answered Feb 28 at 16:28
Sean GallardySean Gallardy
16.9k22654
Is the 8k sector size disk supported in Windows?
Currently, no, it is not supported by Windows and has been documented.
Does SQL Server care about sector sizes?
Yes, SQL Server does care about sector sizes. In fact, SQL Server checks the underlying physical disk information as it has data structures and algorithms that work with current disk sector sizes for various reasons (data integrity, optimizations, etc.).
If you attempt to use a physical sector size above 4k (4096) you'll receive an error:
Msg 5179, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
Cannot use file 'S:FolderTestDB.mdf ', because it is on a volume with sector size 8192.
SQL Server supports a maximum sector size of 4096 bytes.
Move the file to a volume with a compatible sector size.
In this case, you can see that the error message is specifically telling you that the maximum sector size is 4096 (4k). This means that volume can't be used for SQL Server, and as noted above it wouldn't be supported in Windows either.
Solution
If you're receiving this error/issue, unfortunately you'll need to use a supported disk sector size such as 512 bytes or 4k. Other formats are unsupported and can't be used. You'll need to contact your hardware vendor for the Disk subsystem used and ask if there are any other options.
As eckes mentioned in a comment, on Linux you can emulate a 8k drive with the new logical blocksize option of losetup -b with 4.14 kernels.
edited Mar 2 at 5:13
Paul White♦
53.8k14286459
answered Feb 28 at 16:28
Sean GallardySean Gallardy
16.9k22654
edited Mar 2 at 5:13
Paul White♦
53.8k14286459
edited Mar 2 at 5:13
Paul White♦
53.8k14286459
edited Mar 2 at 5:13
Paul White♦
53.8k14286459
53.8k14286459
answered Feb 28 at 16:28
Sean GallardySean Gallardy
16.9k22654
answered Feb 28 at 16:28
Sean GallardySean Gallardy
16.9k22654
answered Feb 28 at 16:28
Sean GallardySean Gallardy
16.9k22654
16.9k22654
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Database Administrators Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f230973%2fdoes-sql-server-2017-including-older-versions-support-8k-disk-sector-sizes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
