=== not working properly [closed]

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP












2












$begingroup$


I've been trying to check the identity using wolfram Mathematica and I've found the following



ppo = Plus[Times[Rational[1,6],Power[a,2],Plus[1,Subscript[i,3]],Plus[2,Subscript[i,3]],Plus[6,Times[-3,s],Times[2,Subscript[i,3]]]],Times[Rational[1,2],Plus[1,Subscript[i,3]],Plus[2,Subscript[i,3]],Plus[6,Times[-5,s],Power[s,2],Times[Plus[5,Times[-2,s]],Subscript[i,3]],Power[Subscript[i,3],2]],Power[Superscript[a,0],2]]]

ppn = Plus[Times[Rational[-1,6],Power[a,2],Plus[-6,Times[3,s],Times[-2,Subscript[i,3]]],Plus[2,Times[3,Subscript[i,3]],Power[Subscript[i,3],2]]],Times[Rational[1,2],Plus[2,Times[3,Subscript[i,3]],Power[Subscript[i,3],2]],Plus[6,Times[-5,s],Power[s,2],Times[Plus[5,Times[-2,s]],Subscript[i,3]],Power[Subscript[i,3],2]],Power[Superscript[a,0],2]]]


And when I try to compare these two expressions with



ppo === ppn


It returns False



But this is actually an identity
enter image description here



So what's the problem here? Am I getting something wrong?






inequalities operators







share|improve this question









$endgroup$



closed as off-topic by m_goldberg, Anton Antonov, march, MarcoB, AccidentalFourierTransform Jan 31 at 0:10


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question arises due to a simple mistake such as a trivial syntax error, incorrect capitalization, spelling mistake, or other typographical error and is unlikely to help any future visitors, or else it is easily found in the documentation." – m_goldberg, Anton Antonov, march, MarcoB, AccidentalFourierTransform
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.















  • $begingroup$
    Simplify[ppn == ppo] gives True. Don't use ===. Your ideas about its semantics are wrong.
    $endgroup$
    – m_goldberg
    Jan 30 at 17:27







  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Expand[ppo] === Expand[ppn] works as well, but the point is that ppo and ppn are not structurally equivalent expressions.
    $endgroup$
    – Jason B.
    Jan 30 at 17:28















2












$begingroup$


I've been trying to check the identity using wolfram Mathematica and I've found the following



ppo = Plus[Times[Rational[1,6],Power[a,2],Plus[1,Subscript[i,3]],Plus[2,Subscript[i,3]],Plus[6,Times[-3,s],Times[2,Subscript[i,3]]]],Times[Rational[1,2],Plus[1,Subscript[i,3]],Plus[2,Subscript[i,3]],Plus[6,Times[-5,s],Power[s,2],Times[Plus[5,Times[-2,s]],Subscript[i,3]],Power[Subscript[i,3],2]],Power[Superscript[a,0],2]]]

ppn = Plus[Times[Rational[-1,6],Power[a,2],Plus[-6,Times[3,s],Times[-2,Subscript[i,3]]],Plus[2,Times[3,Subscript[i,3]],Power[Subscript[i,3],2]]],Times[Rational[1,2],Plus[2,Times[3,Subscript[i,3]],Power[Subscript[i,3],2]],Plus[6,Times[-5,s],Power[s,2],Times[Plus[5,Times[-2,s]],Subscript[i,3]],Power[Subscript[i,3],2]],Power[Superscript[a,0],2]]]


And when I try to compare these two expressions with



ppo === ppn


It returns False



But this is actually an identity
enter image description here



So what's the problem here? Am I getting something wrong?






inequalities operators







share|improve this question









$endgroup$



closed as off-topic by m_goldberg, Anton Antonov, march, MarcoB, AccidentalFourierTransform Jan 31 at 0:10


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question arises due to a simple mistake such as a trivial syntax error, incorrect capitalization, spelling mistake, or other typographical error and is unlikely to help any future visitors, or else it is easily found in the documentation." – m_goldberg, Anton Antonov, march, MarcoB, AccidentalFourierTransform
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.















  • $begingroup$
    Simplify[ppn == ppo] gives True. Don't use ===. Your ideas about its semantics are wrong.
    $endgroup$
    – m_goldberg
    Jan 30 at 17:27







  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Expand[ppo] === Expand[ppn] works as well, but the point is that ppo and ppn are not structurally equivalent expressions.
    $endgroup$
    – Jason B.
    Jan 30 at 17:28













2












2








2





$begingroup$


I've been trying to check the identity using wolfram Mathematica and I've found the following



ppo = Plus[Times[Rational[1,6],Power[a,2],Plus[1,Subscript[i,3]],Plus[2,Subscript[i,3]],Plus[6,Times[-3,s],Times[2,Subscript[i,3]]]],Times[Rational[1,2],Plus[1,Subscript[i,3]],Plus[2,Subscript[i,3]],Plus[6,Times[-5,s],Power[s,2],Times[Plus[5,Times[-2,s]],Subscript[i,3]],Power[Subscript[i,3],2]],Power[Superscript[a,0],2]]]

ppn = Plus[Times[Rational[-1,6],Power[a,2],Plus[-6,Times[3,s],Times[-2,Subscript[i,3]]],Plus[2,Times[3,Subscript[i,3]],Power[Subscript[i,3],2]]],Times[Rational[1,2],Plus[2,Times[3,Subscript[i,3]],Power[Subscript[i,3],2]],Plus[6,Times[-5,s],Power[s,2],Times[Plus[5,Times[-2,s]],Subscript[i,3]],Power[Subscript[i,3],2]],Power[Superscript[a,0],2]]]


And when I try to compare these two expressions with



ppo === ppn


It returns False



But this is actually an identity
enter image description here



So what's the problem here? Am I getting something wrong?






inequalities operators







share|improve this question









$endgroup$




I've been trying to check the identity using wolfram Mathematica and I've found the following



ppo = Plus[Times[Rational[1,6],Power[a,2],Plus[1,Subscript[i,3]],Plus[2,Subscript[i,3]],Plus[6,Times[-3,s],Times[2,Subscript[i,3]]]],Times[Rational[1,2],Plus[1,Subscript[i,3]],Plus[2,Subscript[i,3]],Plus[6,Times[-5,s],Power[s,2],Times[Plus[5,Times[-2,s]],Subscript[i,3]],Power[Subscript[i,3],2]],Power[Superscript[a,0],2]]]

ppn = Plus[Times[Rational[-1,6],Power[a,2],Plus[-6,Times[3,s],Times[-2,Subscript[i,3]]],Plus[2,Times[3,Subscript[i,3]],Power[Subscript[i,3],2]]],Times[Rational[1,2],Plus[2,Times[3,Subscript[i,3]],Power[Subscript[i,3],2]],Plus[6,Times[-5,s],Power[s,2],Times[Plus[5,Times[-2,s]],Subscript[i,3]],Power[Subscript[i,3],2]],Power[Superscript[a,0],2]]]


And when I try to compare these two expressions with



ppo === ppn


It returns False



But this is actually an identity
enter image description here



So what's the problem here? Am I getting something wrong?






inequalities operators




inequalities operators






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Jan 30 at 17:20









Melik KarapetyanMelik Karapetyan

135




135




closed as off-topic by m_goldberg, Anton Antonov, march, MarcoB, AccidentalFourierTransform Jan 31 at 0:10


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question arises due to a simple mistake such as a trivial syntax error, incorrect capitalization, spelling mistake, or other typographical error and is unlikely to help any future visitors, or else it is easily found in the documentation." – m_goldberg, Anton Antonov, march, MarcoB, AccidentalFourierTransform
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.







closed as off-topic by m_goldberg, Anton Antonov, march, MarcoB, AccidentalFourierTransform Jan 31 at 0:10


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question arises due to a simple mistake such as a trivial syntax error, incorrect capitalization, spelling mistake, or other typographical error and is unlikely to help any future visitors, or else it is easily found in the documentation." – m_goldberg, Anton Antonov, march, MarcoB, AccidentalFourierTransform
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.











  • $begingroup$
    Simplify[ppn == ppo] gives True. Don't use ===. Your ideas about its semantics are wrong.
    $endgroup$
    – m_goldberg
    Jan 30 at 17:27







  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Expand[ppo] === Expand[ppn] works as well, but the point is that ppo and ppn are not structurally equivalent expressions.
    $endgroup$
    – Jason B.
    Jan 30 at 17:28
















  • $begingroup$
    Simplify[ppn == ppo] gives True. Don't use ===. Your ideas about its semantics are wrong.
    $endgroup$
    – m_goldberg
    Jan 30 at 17:27







  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Expand[ppo] === Expand[ppn] works as well, but the point is that ppo and ppn are not structurally equivalent expressions.
    $endgroup$
    – Jason B.
    Jan 30 at 17:28















$begingroup$
Simplify[ppn == ppo] gives True. Don't use ===. Your ideas about its semantics are wrong.
$endgroup$
– m_goldberg
Jan 30 at 17:27





$begingroup$
Simplify[ppn == ppo] gives True. Don't use ===. Your ideas about its semantics are wrong.
$endgroup$
– m_goldberg
Jan 30 at 17:27





4




4




$begingroup$
Expand[ppo] === Expand[ppn] works as well, but the point is that ppo and ppn are not structurally equivalent expressions.
$endgroup$
– Jason B.
Jan 30 at 17:28




$begingroup$
Expand[ppo] === Expand[ppn] works as well, but the point is that ppo and ppn are not structurally equivalent expressions.
$endgroup$
– Jason B.
Jan 30 at 17:28










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















4












$begingroup$

SameQ (===) is working as expected.



See the evaluation trace result:



FullSimplify[ppo === ppn] // Trace


enter image description here



Now see this result:



FullSimplify[ppo] === FullSimplify[ppn]

(* True *)


enter image description here






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    3












    $begingroup$

    ppo and ppn may be mathematically identical, but they are not the same structurally. Thus, === returns False. Use ==, and coax it to do the work with Simplify.



    Simplify[ppo == ppn]
    (* True *)





    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      What do you mean by saying "same structurally"?
      $endgroup$
      – Melik Karapetyan
      Jan 30 at 18:15






    • 3




      $begingroup$
      Look at x (y + 1) // TreeForm and x y + x // TreeForm. Do you see the difference? === effectively compares FullForm, of the expressions, and TreeForm is just a visualization of that.
      $endgroup$
      – John Doty
      Jan 30 at 18:36










    • $begingroup$
      Wow, thank you a lot.
      $endgroup$
      – Melik Karapetyan
      Feb 9 at 23:38

















    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    4












    $begingroup$

    SameQ (===) is working as expected.



    See the evaluation trace result:



    FullSimplify[ppo === ppn] // Trace


    enter image description here



    Now see this result:



    FullSimplify[ppo] === FullSimplify[ppn]

    (* True *)


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      4












      $begingroup$

      SameQ (===) is working as expected.



      See the evaluation trace result:



      FullSimplify[ppo === ppn] // Trace


      enter image description here



      Now see this result:



      FullSimplify[ppo] === FullSimplify[ppn]

      (* True *)


      enter image description here






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        4












        4








        4





        $begingroup$

        SameQ (===) is working as expected.



        See the evaluation trace result:



        FullSimplify[ppo === ppn] // Trace


        enter image description here



        Now see this result:



        FullSimplify[ppo] === FullSimplify[ppn]

        (* True *)


        enter image description here






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        SameQ (===) is working as expected.



        See the evaluation trace result:



        FullSimplify[ppo === ppn] // Trace


        enter image description here



        Now see this result:



        FullSimplify[ppo] === FullSimplify[ppn]

        (* True *)


        enter image description here







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Jan 30 at 17:30









        Anton AntonovAnton Antonov

        23.8k167114




        23.8k167114





















            3












            $begingroup$

            ppo and ppn may be mathematically identical, but they are not the same structurally. Thus, === returns False. Use ==, and coax it to do the work with Simplify.



            Simplify[ppo == ppn]
            (* True *)





            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              What do you mean by saying "same structurally"?
              $endgroup$
              – Melik Karapetyan
              Jan 30 at 18:15






            • 3




              $begingroup$
              Look at x (y + 1) // TreeForm and x y + x // TreeForm. Do you see the difference? === effectively compares FullForm, of the expressions, and TreeForm is just a visualization of that.
              $endgroup$
              – John Doty
              Jan 30 at 18:36










            • $begingroup$
              Wow, thank you a lot.
              $endgroup$
              – Melik Karapetyan
              Feb 9 at 23:38















            3












            $begingroup$

            ppo and ppn may be mathematically identical, but they are not the same structurally. Thus, === returns False. Use ==, and coax it to do the work with Simplify.



            Simplify[ppo == ppn]
            (* True *)





            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              What do you mean by saying "same structurally"?
              $endgroup$
              – Melik Karapetyan
              Jan 30 at 18:15






            • 3




              $begingroup$
              Look at x (y + 1) // TreeForm and x y + x // TreeForm. Do you see the difference? === effectively compares FullForm, of the expressions, and TreeForm is just a visualization of that.
              $endgroup$
              – John Doty
              Jan 30 at 18:36










            • $begingroup$
              Wow, thank you a lot.
              $endgroup$
              – Melik Karapetyan
              Feb 9 at 23:38













            3












            3








            3





            $begingroup$

            ppo and ppn may be mathematically identical, but they are not the same structurally. Thus, === returns False. Use ==, and coax it to do the work with Simplify.



            Simplify[ppo == ppn]
            (* True *)





            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            ppo and ppn may be mathematically identical, but they are not the same structurally. Thus, === returns False. Use ==, and coax it to do the work with Simplify.



            Simplify[ppo == ppn]
            (* True *)






            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered Jan 30 at 17:30









            John DotyJohn Doty

            7,11811024




            7,11811024











            • $begingroup$
              What do you mean by saying "same structurally"?
              $endgroup$
              – Melik Karapetyan
              Jan 30 at 18:15






            • 3




              $begingroup$
              Look at x (y + 1) // TreeForm and x y + x // TreeForm. Do you see the difference? === effectively compares FullForm, of the expressions, and TreeForm is just a visualization of that.
              $endgroup$
              – John Doty
              Jan 30 at 18:36










            • $begingroup$
              Wow, thank you a lot.
              $endgroup$
              – Melik Karapetyan
              Feb 9 at 23:38
















            • $begingroup$
              What do you mean by saying "same structurally"?
              $endgroup$
              – Melik Karapetyan
              Jan 30 at 18:15






            • 3




              $begingroup$
              Look at x (y + 1) // TreeForm and x y + x // TreeForm. Do you see the difference? === effectively compares FullForm, of the expressions, and TreeForm is just a visualization of that.
              $endgroup$
              – John Doty
              Jan 30 at 18:36










            • $begingroup$
              Wow, thank you a lot.
              $endgroup$
              – Melik Karapetyan
              Feb 9 at 23:38















            $begingroup$
            What do you mean by saying "same structurally"?
            $endgroup$
            – Melik Karapetyan
            Jan 30 at 18:15




            $begingroup$
            What do you mean by saying "same structurally"?
            $endgroup$
            – Melik Karapetyan
            Jan 30 at 18:15




            3




            3




            $begingroup$
            Look at x (y + 1) // TreeForm and x y + x // TreeForm. Do you see the difference? === effectively compares FullForm, of the expressions, and TreeForm is just a visualization of that.
            $endgroup$
            – John Doty
            Jan 30 at 18:36




            $begingroup$
            Look at x (y + 1) // TreeForm and x y + x // TreeForm. Do you see the difference? === effectively compares FullForm, of the expressions, and TreeForm is just a visualization of that.
            $endgroup$
            – John Doty
            Jan 30 at 18:36












            $begingroup$
            Wow, thank you a lot.
            $endgroup$
            – Melik Karapetyan
            Feb 9 at 23:38




            $begingroup$
            Wow, thank you a lot.
            $endgroup$
            – Melik Karapetyan
            Feb 9 at 23:38


            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

            Image
            Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 1 down vote favorite I'm using WordPress 4.9.8, CiviCRM to 5.5.1, I usually send email to contact by Search> Find contacts View contact details Action> Send email Send email ok, Contact received mail ok like picture But status only Email sent though contact read email or not. So, can CiviCRM can change status to Email read when contact read email? wordpress email share | improve this question asked Sep 26 at 0:12 ToanLuong 49 9 add a comment  |  up vote 1 down vote favorite I'm using WordPress 4.9.8, CiviCRM to 5.5.1, I usually send email to contact by Search> Find contacts View contact details Action> Send email Send email ok, Contact received mail ok like picture But status only Email sent though contact read email or not. So, can CiviCRM can change status to Email read when contact read email? wordpress email share | improve this questi...
            Read more

            Christian Cage

            Image
            Christian Cage Christian in March 2015 Birth name William Jason Reso Born ( 1973-11-30 ) November 30, 1973 (age 45) Kitchener, Ontario, Canada Residence Tampa, Florida, United States Spouse(s) Denise Hartmann ( m.   2001 ) Children 1 Professional wrestling career Ring name(s) Christian [1] Christian Cage [2] Conquistador Dos [3] Male Nurse [4] Billed height 6 ft 1 in (1.85 m) [1] Billed weight 212 lb (96 kg) [1] Billed from Tampa, Florida (WM18, TNA) Toronto, Ontario, Canada [1] Trained by Dory Funk Jr. [2] Ron Hutchison [5] Debut 1995 [5] Retired 2014 [6] William Jason Reso (born November 30, 1973) is a Canadian actor, podcaster and retired professional wrestler best known for his time in WWE under the ring name Christian , a shortened version of his original ring name Christian Cage that was also used during his tenure in Total Nonstop Action Wrestling (TNA). Reso was trained by former professional wrestlers Ron Hutchison and Dory Funk Jr. and m...
            Read more

            Running qemu-guest-agent on windows server 2008

            Image
            Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 0 down vote favorite I know how I need to configure any linux guestvm in order to make qemu-guest-agent work. This is because there is a lot of documentation on it available, this is not the same with a windows guest. I wanted to know what steps I need to take to make qemu-GA work with a windows guest. I know I need to specify a channel type in the xml file of my windows vm, but further than that?? Does somebody has some more experience with this? Thanks. Running system: Debian 9 (on VMware) 3GB ram & 100GB DISK Running libvirt Daemon Several other guest vms running in background Windows guest: Windows server 2012 512MB RAM & 32GB DISK Virtio drivers working windows virtual-machine kvm qemu libvirtd share | improve this question asked Jan 13 at 0:02 codenerd123 1 1 add a comment  |  up vote 0 down vote favorite I know how I need to configure any linux guestvm in...
            Read more