=== not working properly [closed]

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP












2












$begingroup$


I've been trying to check the identity using wolfram Mathematica and I've found the following



ppo = Plus[Times[Rational[1,6],Power[a,2],Plus[1,Subscript[i,3]],Plus[2,Subscript[i,3]],Plus[6,Times[-3,s],Times[2,Subscript[i,3]]]],Times[Rational[1,2],Plus[1,Subscript[i,3]],Plus[2,Subscript[i,3]],Plus[6,Times[-5,s],Power[s,2],Times[Plus[5,Times[-2,s]],Subscript[i,3]],Power[Subscript[i,3],2]],Power[Superscript[a,0],2]]]

ppn = Plus[Times[Rational[-1,6],Power[a,2],Plus[-6,Times[3,s],Times[-2,Subscript[i,3]]],Plus[2,Times[3,Subscript[i,3]],Power[Subscript[i,3],2]]],Times[Rational[1,2],Plus[2,Times[3,Subscript[i,3]],Power[Subscript[i,3],2]],Plus[6,Times[-5,s],Power[s,2],Times[Plus[5,Times[-2,s]],Subscript[i,3]],Power[Subscript[i,3],2]],Power[Superscript[a,0],2]]]


And when I try to compare these two expressions with



ppo === ppn


It returns False



But this is actually an identity
enter image description here



So what's the problem here? Am I getting something wrong?






inequalities operators







share|improve this question









$endgroup$



closed as off-topic by m_goldberg, Anton Antonov, march, MarcoB, AccidentalFourierTransform Jan 31 at 0:10


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question arises due to a simple mistake such as a trivial syntax error, incorrect capitalization, spelling mistake, or other typographical error and is unlikely to help any future visitors, or else it is easily found in the documentation." – m_goldberg, Anton Antonov, march, MarcoB, AccidentalFourierTransform
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.















  • $begingroup$
    Simplify[ppn == ppo] gives True. Don't use ===. Your ideas about its semantics are wrong.
    $endgroup$
    – m_goldberg
    Jan 30 at 17:27







  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Expand[ppo] === Expand[ppn] works as well, but the point is that ppo and ppn are not structurally equivalent expressions.
    $endgroup$
    – Jason B.
    Jan 30 at 17:28















2












$begingroup$


I've been trying to check the identity using wolfram Mathematica and I've found the following



ppo = Plus[Times[Rational[1,6],Power[a,2],Plus[1,Subscript[i,3]],Plus[2,Subscript[i,3]],Plus[6,Times[-3,s],Times[2,Subscript[i,3]]]],Times[Rational[1,2],Plus[1,Subscript[i,3]],Plus[2,Subscript[i,3]],Plus[6,Times[-5,s],Power[s,2],Times[Plus[5,Times[-2,s]],Subscript[i,3]],Power[Subscript[i,3],2]],Power[Superscript[a,0],2]]]

ppn = Plus[Times[Rational[-1,6],Power[a,2],Plus[-6,Times[3,s],Times[-2,Subscript[i,3]]],Plus[2,Times[3,Subscript[i,3]],Power[Subscript[i,3],2]]],Times[Rational[1,2],Plus[2,Times[3,Subscript[i,3]],Power[Subscript[i,3],2]],Plus[6,Times[-5,s],Power[s,2],Times[Plus[5,Times[-2,s]],Subscript[i,3]],Power[Subscript[i,3],2]],Power[Superscript[a,0],2]]]


And when I try to compare these two expressions with



ppo === ppn


It returns False



But this is actually an identity
enter image description here



So what's the problem here? Am I getting something wrong?






inequalities operators







share|improve this question









$endgroup$



closed as off-topic by m_goldberg, Anton Antonov, march, MarcoB, AccidentalFourierTransform Jan 31 at 0:10


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question arises due to a simple mistake such as a trivial syntax error, incorrect capitalization, spelling mistake, or other typographical error and is unlikely to help any future visitors, or else it is easily found in the documentation." – m_goldberg, Anton Antonov, march, MarcoB, AccidentalFourierTransform
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.















  • $begingroup$
    Simplify[ppn == ppo] gives True. Don't use ===. Your ideas about its semantics are wrong.
    $endgroup$
    – m_goldberg
    Jan 30 at 17:27







  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Expand[ppo] === Expand[ppn] works as well, but the point is that ppo and ppn are not structurally equivalent expressions.
    $endgroup$
    – Jason B.
    Jan 30 at 17:28













2












2








2





$begingroup$


I've been trying to check the identity using wolfram Mathematica and I've found the following



ppo = Plus[Times[Rational[1,6],Power[a,2],Plus[1,Subscript[i,3]],Plus[2,Subscript[i,3]],Plus[6,Times[-3,s],Times[2,Subscript[i,3]]]],Times[Rational[1,2],Plus[1,Subscript[i,3]],Plus[2,Subscript[i,3]],Plus[6,Times[-5,s],Power[s,2],Times[Plus[5,Times[-2,s]],Subscript[i,3]],Power[Subscript[i,3],2]],Power[Superscript[a,0],2]]]

ppn = Plus[Times[Rational[-1,6],Power[a,2],Plus[-6,Times[3,s],Times[-2,Subscript[i,3]]],Plus[2,Times[3,Subscript[i,3]],Power[Subscript[i,3],2]]],Times[Rational[1,2],Plus[2,Times[3,Subscript[i,3]],Power[Subscript[i,3],2]],Plus[6,Times[-5,s],Power[s,2],Times[Plus[5,Times[-2,s]],Subscript[i,3]],Power[Subscript[i,3],2]],Power[Superscript[a,0],2]]]


And when I try to compare these two expressions with



ppo === ppn


It returns False



But this is actually an identity
enter image description here



So what's the problem here? Am I getting something wrong?






inequalities operators







share|improve this question









$endgroup$




I've been trying to check the identity using wolfram Mathematica and I've found the following



ppo = Plus[Times[Rational[1,6],Power[a,2],Plus[1,Subscript[i,3]],Plus[2,Subscript[i,3]],Plus[6,Times[-3,s],Times[2,Subscript[i,3]]]],Times[Rational[1,2],Plus[1,Subscript[i,3]],Plus[2,Subscript[i,3]],Plus[6,Times[-5,s],Power[s,2],Times[Plus[5,Times[-2,s]],Subscript[i,3]],Power[Subscript[i,3],2]],Power[Superscript[a,0],2]]]

ppn = Plus[Times[Rational[-1,6],Power[a,2],Plus[-6,Times[3,s],Times[-2,Subscript[i,3]]],Plus[2,Times[3,Subscript[i,3]],Power[Subscript[i,3],2]]],Times[Rational[1,2],Plus[2,Times[3,Subscript[i,3]],Power[Subscript[i,3],2]],Plus[6,Times[-5,s],Power[s,2],Times[Plus[5,Times[-2,s]],Subscript[i,3]],Power[Subscript[i,3],2]],Power[Superscript[a,0],2]]]


And when I try to compare these two expressions with



ppo === ppn


It returns False



But this is actually an identity
enter image description here



So what's the problem here? Am I getting something wrong?






inequalities operators




inequalities operators






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Jan 30 at 17:20









Melik KarapetyanMelik Karapetyan

135




135




closed as off-topic by m_goldberg, Anton Antonov, march, MarcoB, AccidentalFourierTransform Jan 31 at 0:10


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question arises due to a simple mistake such as a trivial syntax error, incorrect capitalization, spelling mistake, or other typographical error and is unlikely to help any future visitors, or else it is easily found in the documentation." – m_goldberg, Anton Antonov, march, MarcoB, AccidentalFourierTransform
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.







closed as off-topic by m_goldberg, Anton Antonov, march, MarcoB, AccidentalFourierTransform Jan 31 at 0:10


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question arises due to a simple mistake such as a trivial syntax error, incorrect capitalization, spelling mistake, or other typographical error and is unlikely to help any future visitors, or else it is easily found in the documentation." – m_goldberg, Anton Antonov, march, MarcoB, AccidentalFourierTransform
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.











  • $begingroup$
    Simplify[ppn == ppo] gives True. Don't use ===. Your ideas about its semantics are wrong.
    $endgroup$
    – m_goldberg
    Jan 30 at 17:27







  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Expand[ppo] === Expand[ppn] works as well, but the point is that ppo and ppn are not structurally equivalent expressions.
    $endgroup$
    – Jason B.
    Jan 30 at 17:28
















  • $begingroup$
    Simplify[ppn == ppo] gives True. Don't use ===. Your ideas about its semantics are wrong.
    $endgroup$
    – m_goldberg
    Jan 30 at 17:27







  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Expand[ppo] === Expand[ppn] works as well, but the point is that ppo and ppn are not structurally equivalent expressions.
    $endgroup$
    – Jason B.
    Jan 30 at 17:28















$begingroup$
Simplify[ppn == ppo] gives True. Don't use ===. Your ideas about its semantics are wrong.
$endgroup$
– m_goldberg
Jan 30 at 17:27





$begingroup$
Simplify[ppn == ppo] gives True. Don't use ===. Your ideas about its semantics are wrong.
$endgroup$
– m_goldberg
Jan 30 at 17:27





4




4




$begingroup$
Expand[ppo] === Expand[ppn] works as well, but the point is that ppo and ppn are not structurally equivalent expressions.
$endgroup$
– Jason B.
Jan 30 at 17:28




$begingroup$
Expand[ppo] === Expand[ppn] works as well, but the point is that ppo and ppn are not structurally equivalent expressions.
$endgroup$
– Jason B.
Jan 30 at 17:28










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















4












$begingroup$

SameQ (===) is working as expected.



See the evaluation trace result:



FullSimplify[ppo === ppn] // Trace


enter image description here



Now see this result:



FullSimplify[ppo] === FullSimplify[ppn]

(* True *)


enter image description here






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    3












    $begingroup$

    ppo and ppn may be mathematically identical, but they are not the same structurally. Thus, === returns False. Use ==, and coax it to do the work with Simplify.



    Simplify[ppo == ppn]
    (* True *)





    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      What do you mean by saying "same structurally"?
      $endgroup$
      – Melik Karapetyan
      Jan 30 at 18:15






    • 3




      $begingroup$
      Look at x (y + 1) // TreeForm and x y + x // TreeForm. Do you see the difference? === effectively compares FullForm, of the expressions, and TreeForm is just a visualization of that.
      $endgroup$
      – John Doty
      Jan 30 at 18:36










    • $begingroup$
      Wow, thank you a lot.
      $endgroup$
      – Melik Karapetyan
      Feb 9 at 23:38

















    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    4












    $begingroup$

    SameQ (===) is working as expected.



    See the evaluation trace result:



    FullSimplify[ppo === ppn] // Trace


    enter image description here



    Now see this result:



    FullSimplify[ppo] === FullSimplify[ppn]

    (* True *)


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      4












      $begingroup$

      SameQ (===) is working as expected.



      See the evaluation trace result:



      FullSimplify[ppo === ppn] // Trace


      enter image description here



      Now see this result:



      FullSimplify[ppo] === FullSimplify[ppn]

      (* True *)


      enter image description here






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        4












        4








        4





        $begingroup$

        SameQ (===) is working as expected.



        See the evaluation trace result:



        FullSimplify[ppo === ppn] // Trace


        enter image description here



        Now see this result:



        FullSimplify[ppo] === FullSimplify[ppn]

        (* True *)


        enter image description here






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        SameQ (===) is working as expected.



        See the evaluation trace result:



        FullSimplify[ppo === ppn] // Trace


        enter image description here



        Now see this result:



        FullSimplify[ppo] === FullSimplify[ppn]

        (* True *)


        enter image description here







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Jan 30 at 17:30









        Anton AntonovAnton Antonov

        23.8k167114




        23.8k167114





















            3












            $begingroup$

            ppo and ppn may be mathematically identical, but they are not the same structurally. Thus, === returns False. Use ==, and coax it to do the work with Simplify.



            Simplify[ppo == ppn]
            (* True *)





            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              What do you mean by saying "same structurally"?
              $endgroup$
              – Melik Karapetyan
              Jan 30 at 18:15






            • 3




              $begingroup$
              Look at x (y + 1) // TreeForm and x y + x // TreeForm. Do you see the difference? === effectively compares FullForm, of the expressions, and TreeForm is just a visualization of that.
              $endgroup$
              – John Doty
              Jan 30 at 18:36










            • $begingroup$
              Wow, thank you a lot.
              $endgroup$
              – Melik Karapetyan
              Feb 9 at 23:38















            3












            $begingroup$

            ppo and ppn may be mathematically identical, but they are not the same structurally. Thus, === returns False. Use ==, and coax it to do the work with Simplify.



            Simplify[ppo == ppn]
            (* True *)





            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              What do you mean by saying "same structurally"?
              $endgroup$
              – Melik Karapetyan
              Jan 30 at 18:15






            • 3




              $begingroup$
              Look at x (y + 1) // TreeForm and x y + x // TreeForm. Do you see the difference? === effectively compares FullForm, of the expressions, and TreeForm is just a visualization of that.
              $endgroup$
              – John Doty
              Jan 30 at 18:36










            • $begingroup$
              Wow, thank you a lot.
              $endgroup$
              – Melik Karapetyan
              Feb 9 at 23:38













            3












            3








            3





            $begingroup$

            ppo and ppn may be mathematically identical, but they are not the same structurally. Thus, === returns False. Use ==, and coax it to do the work with Simplify.



            Simplify[ppo == ppn]
            (* True *)





            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            ppo and ppn may be mathematically identical, but they are not the same structurally. Thus, === returns False. Use ==, and coax it to do the work with Simplify.



            Simplify[ppo == ppn]
            (* True *)






            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered Jan 30 at 17:30









            John DotyJohn Doty

            7,11811024




            7,11811024











            • $begingroup$
              What do you mean by saying "same structurally"?
              $endgroup$
              – Melik Karapetyan
              Jan 30 at 18:15






            • 3




              $begingroup$
              Look at x (y + 1) // TreeForm and x y + x // TreeForm. Do you see the difference? === effectively compares FullForm, of the expressions, and TreeForm is just a visualization of that.
              $endgroup$
              – John Doty
              Jan 30 at 18:36










            • $begingroup$
              Wow, thank you a lot.
              $endgroup$
              – Melik Karapetyan
              Feb 9 at 23:38
















            • $begingroup$
              What do you mean by saying "same structurally"?
              $endgroup$
              – Melik Karapetyan
              Jan 30 at 18:15






            • 3




              $begingroup$
              Look at x (y + 1) // TreeForm and x y + x // TreeForm. Do you see the difference? === effectively compares FullForm, of the expressions, and TreeForm is just a visualization of that.
              $endgroup$
              – John Doty
              Jan 30 at 18:36










            • $begingroup$
              Wow, thank you a lot.
              $endgroup$
              – Melik Karapetyan
              Feb 9 at 23:38















            $begingroup$
            What do you mean by saying "same structurally"?
            $endgroup$
            – Melik Karapetyan
            Jan 30 at 18:15




            $begingroup$
            What do you mean by saying "same structurally"?
            $endgroup$
            – Melik Karapetyan
            Jan 30 at 18:15




            3




            3




            $begingroup$
            Look at x (y + 1) // TreeForm and x y + x // TreeForm. Do you see the difference? === effectively compares FullForm, of the expressions, and TreeForm is just a visualization of that.
            $endgroup$
            – John Doty
            Jan 30 at 18:36




            $begingroup$
            Look at x (y + 1) // TreeForm and x y + x // TreeForm. Do you see the difference? === effectively compares FullForm, of the expressions, and TreeForm is just a visualization of that.
            $endgroup$
            – John Doty
            Jan 30 at 18:36












            $begingroup$
            Wow, thank you a lot.
            $endgroup$
            – Melik Karapetyan
            Feb 9 at 23:38




            $begingroup$
            Wow, thank you a lot.
            $endgroup$
            – Melik Karapetyan
            Feb 9 at 23:38


            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

            Image
            Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 1 down vote favorite I'm using WordPress 4.9.8, CiviCRM to 5.5.1, I usually send email to contact by Search> Find contacts View contact details Action> Send email Send email ok, Contact received mail ok like picture But status only Email sent though contact read email or not. So, can CiviCRM can change status to Email read when contact read email? wordpress email share | improve this question asked Sep 26 at 0:12 ToanLuong 49 9 add a comment  |  up vote 1 down vote favorite I'm using WordPress 4.9.8, CiviCRM to 5.5.1, I usually send email to contact by Search> Find contacts View contact details Action> Send email Send email ok, Contact received mail ok like picture But status only Email sent though contact read email or not. So, can CiviCRM can change status to Email read when contact read email? wordpress email share | improve this question asked Se
            Read more

            Bahrain

            Image
            For other uses, see Bahrain (disambiguation). Sovereign island state in the Persian Gulf Kingdom of Bahrain مملكة البحرين   (Arabic) Mamlakat al-Baḥrayn Flag Coat of arms Anthem:  نشيد البحرين الوطني Bahrainona Our Bahrain Location of   Bahrain    (circled in red) Capital and largest city Manama 26°13′N 50°35′E  /  26.217°N 50.583°E  / 26.217; 50.583 Official languages Arabic Ethnic groups (2010 [1] ) 50.7% Arab (46% Bahrani, 4.7% other Arabs) 45.5% Asian 1% European 1.2% Others Religion Islam Demonym(s) Bahraini Government Unitary constitutional monarchy • King Hamad bin Isa Al Khalifa • Crown Prince Salman bin Hamad bin Isa Al Khalifa • Prime Minister Khalifa bin Salman Al Khalifa Legislature National Assembly • Upper house Consultative Council • Lower house Council of Representatives Independence • Declared Independence [2] 14 August 1971 • from United Kingdom [1] 15 August 1971 • Admitted to the United Nations 21 September 1971 • Kingdom of Bahrain 14 February 2002
            Read more

            Postfix configuration issue with fips on centos 7; mailgun relay

            Image
            Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 0 down vote favorite I am trying to setup postfix to relay all mail generated on the local machine via SMTP to a mailgun relay. I have used the mailgun relay before with success on an ubuntu server, but I am migrating to a Centos 7 server which I will be running in FIPS mode. There error log is below, slightly sanitized. I have a small enough network that I choose to have each machine reach out to mailgun individually (this the loopback-only, 127.0.0.0/8 restrictions) and no firewall open port allowing smtp in to the machine. I assume the FIPS mode (and with it disabling of MD5) is causing problems, but I don't know how to overcome it or if it is even possible for tls_fprint to use some supported hash such as sha256 or sha512. However, the relay=none is slightly concerning since I have relayhost set, but perhaps that is because the smtp process is failing? Any help would be appreciated! postconf -n: alias_database = hash:/etc/alia
            Read more