Killed Backup in Rollback State for Days

Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
I killed a backup job of an 80 MB database which has been rolling back for days...
I tried to take the database into single user mode, but that too hung in rollback state.
I tried killing all sessions connected to the database, but still cannot drop it. I used this script to do the kill:
DECLARE @kill varchar(8000) = ''; SELECT @kill = @kill + 'kill ' +
CONVERT(varchar(5), session_id) + ';'
FROM sys.dm_exec_sessions
WHERE database_id = db_id('fpddev92')
exec(@kill)
The task's most recent wait type is CMEMTHREAD. I cannot restore the database with a different name since there is an application using it that has a hard-coded database name within the app.
I am allowed to drop and restore the database if need be. How do I solve this issue??? It is suspended. No blocking.
I'm afraid if I restart the service it will simply pickup the rollback upon startup.
Any help is greatly appreciated! I have never seen anything like this in my life...
sql-server sql-server-2012
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
I killed a backup job of an 80 MB database which has been rolling back for days...
I tried to take the database into single user mode, but that too hung in rollback state.
I tried killing all sessions connected to the database, but still cannot drop it. I used this script to do the kill:
DECLARE @kill varchar(8000) = ''; SELECT @kill = @kill + 'kill ' +
CONVERT(varchar(5), session_id) + ';'
FROM sys.dm_exec_sessions
WHERE database_id = db_id('fpddev92')
exec(@kill)
The task's most recent wait type is CMEMTHREAD. I cannot restore the database with a different name since there is an application using it that has a hard-coded database name within the app.
I am allowed to drop and restore the database if need be. How do I solve this issue??? It is suspended. No blocking.
I'm afraid if I restart the service it will simply pickup the rollback upon startup.
Any help is greatly appreciated! I have never seen anything like this in my life...
sql-server sql-server-2012
Are you the same user who posted the previous question from 8 days ago? If yes, you may want to ask to merge your accounts.
– Max Vernon
6 hours ago
1
Yeah that query is unreliable precisely because if a query has locks on DB1 and DB2, sys.dm_exec_sessions can only show one of them. It may not be the one that matters. In the future, avoidKILL, always useALTER DATABASE dbname SET SINGLE_USER WITH ROLLBACK IMMEDIATE;
– Aaron Bertrand♦
5 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
I killed a backup job of an 80 MB database which has been rolling back for days...
I tried to take the database into single user mode, but that too hung in rollback state.
I tried killing all sessions connected to the database, but still cannot drop it. I used this script to do the kill:
DECLARE @kill varchar(8000) = ''; SELECT @kill = @kill + 'kill ' +
CONVERT(varchar(5), session_id) + ';'
FROM sys.dm_exec_sessions
WHERE database_id = db_id('fpddev92')
exec(@kill)
The task's most recent wait type is CMEMTHREAD. I cannot restore the database with a different name since there is an application using it that has a hard-coded database name within the app.
I am allowed to drop and restore the database if need be. How do I solve this issue??? It is suspended. No blocking.
I'm afraid if I restart the service it will simply pickup the rollback upon startup.
Any help is greatly appreciated! I have never seen anything like this in my life...
sql-server sql-server-2012
I killed a backup job of an 80 MB database which has been rolling back for days...
I tried to take the database into single user mode, but that too hung in rollback state.
I tried killing all sessions connected to the database, but still cannot drop it. I used this script to do the kill:
DECLARE @kill varchar(8000) = ''; SELECT @kill = @kill + 'kill ' +
CONVERT(varchar(5), session_id) + ';'
FROM sys.dm_exec_sessions
WHERE database_id = db_id('fpddev92')
exec(@kill)
The task's most recent wait type is CMEMTHREAD. I cannot restore the database with a different name since there is an application using it that has a hard-coded database name within the app.
I am allowed to drop and restore the database if need be. How do I solve this issue??? It is suspended. No blocking.
I'm afraid if I restart the service it will simply pickup the rollback upon startup.
Any help is greatly appreciated! I have never seen anything like this in my life...
sql-server sql-server-2012
sql-server sql-server-2012
edited 4 hours ago
Max Vernon
49.8k13110214
49.8k13110214
asked 6 hours ago
SQLOakland
261
261
Are you the same user who posted the previous question from 8 days ago? If yes, you may want to ask to merge your accounts.
– Max Vernon
6 hours ago
1
Yeah that query is unreliable precisely because if a query has locks on DB1 and DB2, sys.dm_exec_sessions can only show one of them. It may not be the one that matters. In the future, avoidKILL, always useALTER DATABASE dbname SET SINGLE_USER WITH ROLLBACK IMMEDIATE;
– Aaron Bertrand♦
5 hours ago
add a comment |
Are you the same user who posted the previous question from 8 days ago? If yes, you may want to ask to merge your accounts.
– Max Vernon
6 hours ago
1
Yeah that query is unreliable precisely because if a query has locks on DB1 and DB2, sys.dm_exec_sessions can only show one of them. It may not be the one that matters. In the future, avoidKILL, always useALTER DATABASE dbname SET SINGLE_USER WITH ROLLBACK IMMEDIATE;
– Aaron Bertrand♦
5 hours ago
Are you the same user who posted the previous question from 8 days ago? If yes, you may want to ask to merge your accounts.
– Max Vernon
6 hours ago
Are you the same user who posted the previous question from 8 days ago? If yes, you may want to ask to merge your accounts.
– Max Vernon
6 hours ago
1
1
Yeah that query is unreliable precisely because if a query has locks on DB1 and DB2, sys.dm_exec_sessions can only show one of them. It may not be the one that matters. In the future, avoid
KILL, always use ALTER DATABASE dbname SET SINGLE_USER WITH ROLLBACK IMMEDIATE;– Aaron Bertrand♦
5 hours ago
Yeah that query is unreliable precisely because if a query has locks on DB1 and DB2, sys.dm_exec_sessions can only show one of them. It may not be the one that matters. In the future, avoid
KILL, always use ALTER DATABASE dbname SET SINGLE_USER WITH ROLLBACK IMMEDIATE;– Aaron Bertrand♦
5 hours ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
8
down vote
Since the backup is waiting on a CMEMTHREAD, that is a critical section waiting for a memory allocation, it is likely that a restart of the service will either allow recovery to start on the database, or for the database to be marked "suspect", at which point you could drop and restore from backup. Recovery on a 70MB database, assuming the log file isn't many many gigabytes, should be nearly instantaneous.
As always, before doing anything of this nature, you need to ensure you have verified-good backups of critical databases on this instance - by "verified", I mean you've restored them onto some other server (or your workstation), to ensure you can actually perform a restore. There is nothing like getting free advice from the internet only to find you've lost everything.
As an aside, you should ensure you have the most recent service pack and cumulative update installed on your SQL Server; see SQLServerBuilds for details.
Thanks! Yes, I have tested the backup on DEV. Looks like a reboot is in order!
– SQLOakland
5 hours ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
8
down vote
Since the backup is waiting on a CMEMTHREAD, that is a critical section waiting for a memory allocation, it is likely that a restart of the service will either allow recovery to start on the database, or for the database to be marked "suspect", at which point you could drop and restore from backup. Recovery on a 70MB database, assuming the log file isn't many many gigabytes, should be nearly instantaneous.
As always, before doing anything of this nature, you need to ensure you have verified-good backups of critical databases on this instance - by "verified", I mean you've restored them onto some other server (or your workstation), to ensure you can actually perform a restore. There is nothing like getting free advice from the internet only to find you've lost everything.
As an aside, you should ensure you have the most recent service pack and cumulative update installed on your SQL Server; see SQLServerBuilds for details.
Thanks! Yes, I have tested the backup on DEV. Looks like a reboot is in order!
– SQLOakland
5 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
8
down vote
Since the backup is waiting on a CMEMTHREAD, that is a critical section waiting for a memory allocation, it is likely that a restart of the service will either allow recovery to start on the database, or for the database to be marked "suspect", at which point you could drop and restore from backup. Recovery on a 70MB database, assuming the log file isn't many many gigabytes, should be nearly instantaneous.
As always, before doing anything of this nature, you need to ensure you have verified-good backups of critical databases on this instance - by "verified", I mean you've restored them onto some other server (or your workstation), to ensure you can actually perform a restore. There is nothing like getting free advice from the internet only to find you've lost everything.
As an aside, you should ensure you have the most recent service pack and cumulative update installed on your SQL Server; see SQLServerBuilds for details.
Thanks! Yes, I have tested the backup on DEV. Looks like a reboot is in order!
– SQLOakland
5 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
8
down vote
up vote
8
down vote
Since the backup is waiting on a CMEMTHREAD, that is a critical section waiting for a memory allocation, it is likely that a restart of the service will either allow recovery to start on the database, or for the database to be marked "suspect", at which point you could drop and restore from backup. Recovery on a 70MB database, assuming the log file isn't many many gigabytes, should be nearly instantaneous.
As always, before doing anything of this nature, you need to ensure you have verified-good backups of critical databases on this instance - by "verified", I mean you've restored them onto some other server (or your workstation), to ensure you can actually perform a restore. There is nothing like getting free advice from the internet only to find you've lost everything.
As an aside, you should ensure you have the most recent service pack and cumulative update installed on your SQL Server; see SQLServerBuilds for details.
Since the backup is waiting on a CMEMTHREAD, that is a critical section waiting for a memory allocation, it is likely that a restart of the service will either allow recovery to start on the database, or for the database to be marked "suspect", at which point you could drop and restore from backup. Recovery on a 70MB database, assuming the log file isn't many many gigabytes, should be nearly instantaneous.
As always, before doing anything of this nature, you need to ensure you have verified-good backups of critical databases on this instance - by "verified", I mean you've restored them onto some other server (or your workstation), to ensure you can actually perform a restore. There is nothing like getting free advice from the internet only to find you've lost everything.
As an aside, you should ensure you have the most recent service pack and cumulative update installed on your SQL Server; see SQLServerBuilds for details.
edited 5 hours ago
answered 6 hours ago
Max Vernon
49.8k13110214
49.8k13110214
Thanks! Yes, I have tested the backup on DEV. Looks like a reboot is in order!
– SQLOakland
5 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks! Yes, I have tested the backup on DEV. Looks like a reboot is in order!
– SQLOakland
5 hours ago
Thanks! Yes, I have tested the backup on DEV. Looks like a reboot is in order!
– SQLOakland
5 hours ago
Thanks! Yes, I have tested the backup on DEV. Looks like a reboot is in order!
– SQLOakland
5 hours ago
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f222212%2fkilled-backup-in-rollback-state-for-days%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Are you the same user who posted the previous question from 8 days ago? If yes, you may want to ask to merge your accounts.
– Max Vernon
6 hours ago
1
Yeah that query is unreliable precisely because if a query has locks on DB1 and DB2, sys.dm_exec_sessions can only show one of them. It may not be the one that matters. In the future, avoid
KILL, always useALTER DATABASE dbname SET SINGLE_USER WITH ROLLBACK IMMEDIATE;– Aaron Bertrand♦
5 hours ago