run a script in multiple folders in parallel

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
5
down vote

favorite












I have several sub-directories within on high level directory. Each sub-directory has several files and a for loop shell script. The same for loop script is present in each sub-directory. I want to go into each sub-directory and run the for loop script in parallel in several terminals.
I tried this but it seems to do serially (one after another) but I want run all of them in parallel.



find dir_* -type f -execdir sh for_loop.sh ;









share|improve this question



























    up vote
    5
    down vote

    favorite












    I have several sub-directories within on high level directory. Each sub-directory has several files and a for loop shell script. The same for loop script is present in each sub-directory. I want to go into each sub-directory and run the for loop script in parallel in several terminals.
    I tried this but it seems to do serially (one after another) but I want run all of them in parallel.



    find dir_* -type f -execdir sh for_loop.sh ;









    share|improve this question

























      up vote
      5
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      5
      down vote

      favorite











      I have several sub-directories within on high level directory. Each sub-directory has several files and a for loop shell script. The same for loop script is present in each sub-directory. I want to go into each sub-directory and run the for loop script in parallel in several terminals.
      I tried this but it seems to do serially (one after another) but I want run all of them in parallel.



      find dir_* -type f -execdir sh for_loop.sh ;









      share|improve this question















      I have several sub-directories within on high level directory. Each sub-directory has several files and a for loop shell script. The same for loop script is present in each sub-directory. I want to go into each sub-directory and run the for loop script in parallel in several terminals.
      I tried this but it seems to do serially (one after another) but I want run all of them in parallel.



      find dir_* -type f -execdir sh for_loop.sh ;






      bash shell-script files parallelism






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited May 29 '17 at 23:03









      Gilles

      512k12010151547




      512k12010151547










      asked May 29 '17 at 7:07









      user233520

      262




      262




















          5 Answers
          5






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          4
          down vote













          Probably the perfect tool for this is GNU Parallel:



          parallel ::: dir_*/for_loop.sh


          GNU Parallel not only runs each job in parallel, but also it demultiplexes their output so they won't interfere with each other.



          From its man page:




          GNU parallel is a shell tool for executing jobs in parallel using one or more computers. A job can be a single command or a small script that has to be run for each of the lines in the input. The typical input is a list of files, a list of hosts, a list of users, a list of URLs, or a list of tables. A job can also be a command that reads from a pipe. GNU parallel can then split the input into blocks and pipe a block into each command in parallel.



          If you use xargs and tee today you will find GNU parallel very easy to use as GNU parallel is written to have the same options as xargs. If you write loops in shell, you will find GNU parallel may be able to replace most of the loops and make them run faster by running several jobs in parallel.



          GNU parallel makes sure output from the commands is the same output as you would get had you run the commands sequentially. This makes it possible to use output from GNU parallel as input for other programs.







          share|improve this answer





























            up vote
            3
            down vote













            find won't do that for you.



            create a skript, locate your for_loop.sh scripts and execute them, like so:



            #!/bin/bash

            for theScript in $(find dir_* -name for_loop.sh); do
            "$theScript" &
            done


            if the script has to be run inside the sub-dir, try to cd into before, maybe like cd $(dirname "$theScript") && . $(basename "$theScript").



            my examples are not tested in detail and not error-tolerant ...



            Edit 1:



            As Sato Katsura commented correctly, the script above breaks if there are spaces in the directory name.



            So I changed to loop to read:



            #!/bin/bash
            find dir_* -name for_loop.sh | while IFS= read -r theScript; do
            "$theScript" &
            done





            share|improve this answer






















            • This breaks if you have spaces in the names of a directories.
              – Satō Katsura
              May 29 '17 at 8:01











            • It would still break on spaces. You need IFS= in the while read. And filenames with newlines are still not handled properly.
              – user218374
              May 29 '17 at 9:56











            • You are right, but please notice the answer points to the concrete question to execute the script for_loop.sh inside each directory in parrallel, not to handle each file. The file handling inside the directories is up to the corresponding script. But thanks for editing anyway.
              – ChristophS
              May 29 '17 at 10:12











            • I vote up for this answer because it does not require anything and is more complete than mine
              – M4rty
              May 29 '17 at 20:22

















            up vote
            2
            down vote













            You should be passing on find's output to xargs, running in parallel mode:



            find dir_*/ -type f -name for_loop.sh -print0 | xargs -0 -r -n 1 -P 3 -t sh


            We are asking find here to find all files with names of for_loop.sh recursively under the directories beginning with the names dir_ and pass them on to xargs, a file at a time, in parallel mode of running no more than 3 processes at any given time.



            Use is made of the null delimiter in printing filenames by find and splitting them on nulls by xargs.






            share|improve this answer



























              up vote
              2
              down vote













              Assuming this does the right thing - only in serial:



              find dir_* -type f -execdir sh for_loop.sh ;


              Then you should be able to replace that with:



              find dir_* -type f | parallel 'cd // && sh for_loop.sh '


              To run it in multiple terminals GNU Parallel supports tmux to run each command in its own tmux pane:



              find dir_* -type f | parallel --tmuxpane 'cd // && sh for_loop.sh '


              It defaults to one job per CPU core. In your case you might want to run one more job than you have cores:



               find dir_* -type f | parallel -j+1 --tmuxpane 'cd // && sh for_loop.sh '


              GNU Parallel is a general parallelizer and makes is easy to run jobs in parallel on the same machine or on multiple machines you have ssh access to.



              If you have 32 different jobs you want to run on 4 CPUs, a straight forward way to parallelize is to run 8 jobs on each CPU:



              Simple scheduling



              GNU Parallel instead spawns a new process when one finishes - keeping the CPUs active and thus saving time:



              GNU Parallel scheduling



              Installation



              For security reasons you should install GNU Parallel with your package manager, but if GNU Parallel is not packaged for your distribution, you can do a personal installation, which does not require root access. It can be done in 10 seconds by doing this:



              (wget -O - pi.dk/3 || curl pi.dk/3/ || fetch -o - http://pi.dk/3) | bash


              For other installation options see http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/parallel.git/tree/README



              Learn more



              See more examples: http://www.gnu.org/software/parallel/man.html



              Watch the intro videos: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL284C9FF2488BC6D1



              Walk through the tutorial: http://www.gnu.org/software/parallel/parallel_tutorial.html



              Sign up for the email list to get support: https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/parallel






              share|improve this answer




















              • Off-topic: how did you produce the graphics?
                – Nikos Alexandris
                Aug 17 '17 at 18:23










              • LibreOffice Draw.
                – Ole Tange
                Aug 18 '17 at 5:53

















              up vote
              0
              down vote













              you can do from your top level directory



              for D in `find . -type d -maxdepth 1`
              do
              $D/<yourScriptName>.sh &
              done


              the "&" is to run them in the background






              share|improve this answer
















              • 1




                Like the similar answer by ChristophS, this breaks if the output from find contains whitespace or shell wildcard characters which end up not matching themselves and only themselves.
                – tripleee
                May 29 '17 at 13:06










              Your Answer







              StackExchange.ready(function()
              var channelOptions =
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "106"
              ;
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
              createEditor();
              );

              else
              createEditor();

              );

              function createEditor()
              StackExchange.prepareEditor(
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              convertImagesToLinks: false,
              noModals: false,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: null,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              );



              );













               

              draft saved


              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function ()
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f367838%2frun-a-script-in-multiple-folders-in-parallel%23new-answer', 'question_page');

              );

              Post as a guest






























              5 Answers
              5






              active

              oldest

              votes








              5 Answers
              5






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes








              up vote
              4
              down vote













              Probably the perfect tool for this is GNU Parallel:



              parallel ::: dir_*/for_loop.sh


              GNU Parallel not only runs each job in parallel, but also it demultiplexes their output so they won't interfere with each other.



              From its man page:




              GNU parallel is a shell tool for executing jobs in parallel using one or more computers. A job can be a single command or a small script that has to be run for each of the lines in the input. The typical input is a list of files, a list of hosts, a list of users, a list of URLs, or a list of tables. A job can also be a command that reads from a pipe. GNU parallel can then split the input into blocks and pipe a block into each command in parallel.



              If you use xargs and tee today you will find GNU parallel very easy to use as GNU parallel is written to have the same options as xargs. If you write loops in shell, you will find GNU parallel may be able to replace most of the loops and make them run faster by running several jobs in parallel.



              GNU parallel makes sure output from the commands is the same output as you would get had you run the commands sequentially. This makes it possible to use output from GNU parallel as input for other programs.







              share|improve this answer


























                up vote
                4
                down vote













                Probably the perfect tool for this is GNU Parallel:



                parallel ::: dir_*/for_loop.sh


                GNU Parallel not only runs each job in parallel, but also it demultiplexes their output so they won't interfere with each other.



                From its man page:




                GNU parallel is a shell tool for executing jobs in parallel using one or more computers. A job can be a single command or a small script that has to be run for each of the lines in the input. The typical input is a list of files, a list of hosts, a list of users, a list of URLs, or a list of tables. A job can also be a command that reads from a pipe. GNU parallel can then split the input into blocks and pipe a block into each command in parallel.



                If you use xargs and tee today you will find GNU parallel very easy to use as GNU parallel is written to have the same options as xargs. If you write loops in shell, you will find GNU parallel may be able to replace most of the loops and make them run faster by running several jobs in parallel.



                GNU parallel makes sure output from the commands is the same output as you would get had you run the commands sequentially. This makes it possible to use output from GNU parallel as input for other programs.







                share|improve this answer
























                  up vote
                  4
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  4
                  down vote









                  Probably the perfect tool for this is GNU Parallel:



                  parallel ::: dir_*/for_loop.sh


                  GNU Parallel not only runs each job in parallel, but also it demultiplexes their output so they won't interfere with each other.



                  From its man page:




                  GNU parallel is a shell tool for executing jobs in parallel using one or more computers. A job can be a single command or a small script that has to be run for each of the lines in the input. The typical input is a list of files, a list of hosts, a list of users, a list of URLs, or a list of tables. A job can also be a command that reads from a pipe. GNU parallel can then split the input into blocks and pipe a block into each command in parallel.



                  If you use xargs and tee today you will find GNU parallel very easy to use as GNU parallel is written to have the same options as xargs. If you write loops in shell, you will find GNU parallel may be able to replace most of the loops and make them run faster by running several jobs in parallel.



                  GNU parallel makes sure output from the commands is the same output as you would get had you run the commands sequentially. This makes it possible to use output from GNU parallel as input for other programs.







                  share|improve this answer














                  Probably the perfect tool for this is GNU Parallel:



                  parallel ::: dir_*/for_loop.sh


                  GNU Parallel not only runs each job in parallel, but also it demultiplexes their output so they won't interfere with each other.



                  From its man page:




                  GNU parallel is a shell tool for executing jobs in parallel using one or more computers. A job can be a single command or a small script that has to be run for each of the lines in the input. The typical input is a list of files, a list of hosts, a list of users, a list of URLs, or a list of tables. A job can also be a command that reads from a pipe. GNU parallel can then split the input into blocks and pipe a block into each command in parallel.



                  If you use xargs and tee today you will find GNU parallel very easy to use as GNU parallel is written to have the same options as xargs. If you write loops in shell, you will find GNU parallel may be able to replace most of the loops and make them run faster by running several jobs in parallel.



                  GNU parallel makes sure output from the commands is the same output as you would get had you run the commands sequentially. This makes it possible to use output from GNU parallel as input for other programs.








                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited Oct 1 at 13:28









                  Ole Tange

                  11.6k1446103




                  11.6k1446103










                  answered May 29 '17 at 8:47









                  dr01

                  15.4k114869




                  15.4k114869






















                      up vote
                      3
                      down vote













                      find won't do that for you.



                      create a skript, locate your for_loop.sh scripts and execute them, like so:



                      #!/bin/bash

                      for theScript in $(find dir_* -name for_loop.sh); do
                      "$theScript" &
                      done


                      if the script has to be run inside the sub-dir, try to cd into before, maybe like cd $(dirname "$theScript") && . $(basename "$theScript").



                      my examples are not tested in detail and not error-tolerant ...



                      Edit 1:



                      As Sato Katsura commented correctly, the script above breaks if there are spaces in the directory name.



                      So I changed to loop to read:



                      #!/bin/bash
                      find dir_* -name for_loop.sh | while IFS= read -r theScript; do
                      "$theScript" &
                      done





                      share|improve this answer






















                      • This breaks if you have spaces in the names of a directories.
                        – Satō Katsura
                        May 29 '17 at 8:01











                      • It would still break on spaces. You need IFS= in the while read. And filenames with newlines are still not handled properly.
                        – user218374
                        May 29 '17 at 9:56











                      • You are right, but please notice the answer points to the concrete question to execute the script for_loop.sh inside each directory in parrallel, not to handle each file. The file handling inside the directories is up to the corresponding script. But thanks for editing anyway.
                        – ChristophS
                        May 29 '17 at 10:12











                      • I vote up for this answer because it does not require anything and is more complete than mine
                        – M4rty
                        May 29 '17 at 20:22














                      up vote
                      3
                      down vote













                      find won't do that for you.



                      create a skript, locate your for_loop.sh scripts and execute them, like so:



                      #!/bin/bash

                      for theScript in $(find dir_* -name for_loop.sh); do
                      "$theScript" &
                      done


                      if the script has to be run inside the sub-dir, try to cd into before, maybe like cd $(dirname "$theScript") && . $(basename "$theScript").



                      my examples are not tested in detail and not error-tolerant ...



                      Edit 1:



                      As Sato Katsura commented correctly, the script above breaks if there are spaces in the directory name.



                      So I changed to loop to read:



                      #!/bin/bash
                      find dir_* -name for_loop.sh | while IFS= read -r theScript; do
                      "$theScript" &
                      done





                      share|improve this answer






















                      • This breaks if you have spaces in the names of a directories.
                        – Satō Katsura
                        May 29 '17 at 8:01











                      • It would still break on spaces. You need IFS= in the while read. And filenames with newlines are still not handled properly.
                        – user218374
                        May 29 '17 at 9:56











                      • You are right, but please notice the answer points to the concrete question to execute the script for_loop.sh inside each directory in parrallel, not to handle each file. The file handling inside the directories is up to the corresponding script. But thanks for editing anyway.
                        – ChristophS
                        May 29 '17 at 10:12











                      • I vote up for this answer because it does not require anything and is more complete than mine
                        – M4rty
                        May 29 '17 at 20:22












                      up vote
                      3
                      down vote










                      up vote
                      3
                      down vote









                      find won't do that for you.



                      create a skript, locate your for_loop.sh scripts and execute them, like so:



                      #!/bin/bash

                      for theScript in $(find dir_* -name for_loop.sh); do
                      "$theScript" &
                      done


                      if the script has to be run inside the sub-dir, try to cd into before, maybe like cd $(dirname "$theScript") && . $(basename "$theScript").



                      my examples are not tested in detail and not error-tolerant ...



                      Edit 1:



                      As Sato Katsura commented correctly, the script above breaks if there are spaces in the directory name.



                      So I changed to loop to read:



                      #!/bin/bash
                      find dir_* -name for_loop.sh | while IFS= read -r theScript; do
                      "$theScript" &
                      done





                      share|improve this answer














                      find won't do that for you.



                      create a skript, locate your for_loop.sh scripts and execute them, like so:



                      #!/bin/bash

                      for theScript in $(find dir_* -name for_loop.sh); do
                      "$theScript" &
                      done


                      if the script has to be run inside the sub-dir, try to cd into before, maybe like cd $(dirname "$theScript") && . $(basename "$theScript").



                      my examples are not tested in detail and not error-tolerant ...



                      Edit 1:



                      As Sato Katsura commented correctly, the script above breaks if there are spaces in the directory name.



                      So I changed to loop to read:



                      #!/bin/bash
                      find dir_* -name for_loop.sh | while IFS= read -r theScript; do
                      "$theScript" &
                      done






                      share|improve this answer














                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer








                      edited May 29 '17 at 9:57







                      user218374

















                      answered May 29 '17 at 7:25









                      ChristophS

                      39329




                      39329











                      • This breaks if you have spaces in the names of a directories.
                        – Satō Katsura
                        May 29 '17 at 8:01











                      • It would still break on spaces. You need IFS= in the while read. And filenames with newlines are still not handled properly.
                        – user218374
                        May 29 '17 at 9:56











                      • You are right, but please notice the answer points to the concrete question to execute the script for_loop.sh inside each directory in parrallel, not to handle each file. The file handling inside the directories is up to the corresponding script. But thanks for editing anyway.
                        – ChristophS
                        May 29 '17 at 10:12











                      • I vote up for this answer because it does not require anything and is more complete than mine
                        – M4rty
                        May 29 '17 at 20:22
















                      • This breaks if you have spaces in the names of a directories.
                        – Satō Katsura
                        May 29 '17 at 8:01











                      • It would still break on spaces. You need IFS= in the while read. And filenames with newlines are still not handled properly.
                        – user218374
                        May 29 '17 at 9:56











                      • You are right, but please notice the answer points to the concrete question to execute the script for_loop.sh inside each directory in parrallel, not to handle each file. The file handling inside the directories is up to the corresponding script. But thanks for editing anyway.
                        – ChristophS
                        May 29 '17 at 10:12











                      • I vote up for this answer because it does not require anything and is more complete than mine
                        – M4rty
                        May 29 '17 at 20:22















                      This breaks if you have spaces in the names of a directories.
                      – Satō Katsura
                      May 29 '17 at 8:01





                      This breaks if you have spaces in the names of a directories.
                      – Satō Katsura
                      May 29 '17 at 8:01













                      It would still break on spaces. You need IFS= in the while read. And filenames with newlines are still not handled properly.
                      – user218374
                      May 29 '17 at 9:56





                      It would still break on spaces. You need IFS= in the while read. And filenames with newlines are still not handled properly.
                      – user218374
                      May 29 '17 at 9:56













                      You are right, but please notice the answer points to the concrete question to execute the script for_loop.sh inside each directory in parrallel, not to handle each file. The file handling inside the directories is up to the corresponding script. But thanks for editing anyway.
                      – ChristophS
                      May 29 '17 at 10:12





                      You are right, but please notice the answer points to the concrete question to execute the script for_loop.sh inside each directory in parrallel, not to handle each file. The file handling inside the directories is up to the corresponding script. But thanks for editing anyway.
                      – ChristophS
                      May 29 '17 at 10:12













                      I vote up for this answer because it does not require anything and is more complete than mine
                      – M4rty
                      May 29 '17 at 20:22




                      I vote up for this answer because it does not require anything and is more complete than mine
                      – M4rty
                      May 29 '17 at 20:22










                      up vote
                      2
                      down vote













                      You should be passing on find's output to xargs, running in parallel mode:



                      find dir_*/ -type f -name for_loop.sh -print0 | xargs -0 -r -n 1 -P 3 -t sh


                      We are asking find here to find all files with names of for_loop.sh recursively under the directories beginning with the names dir_ and pass them on to xargs, a file at a time, in parallel mode of running no more than 3 processes at any given time.



                      Use is made of the null delimiter in printing filenames by find and splitting them on nulls by xargs.






                      share|improve this answer
























                        up vote
                        2
                        down vote













                        You should be passing on find's output to xargs, running in parallel mode:



                        find dir_*/ -type f -name for_loop.sh -print0 | xargs -0 -r -n 1 -P 3 -t sh


                        We are asking find here to find all files with names of for_loop.sh recursively under the directories beginning with the names dir_ and pass them on to xargs, a file at a time, in parallel mode of running no more than 3 processes at any given time.



                        Use is made of the null delimiter in printing filenames by find and splitting them on nulls by xargs.






                        share|improve this answer






















                          up vote
                          2
                          down vote










                          up vote
                          2
                          down vote









                          You should be passing on find's output to xargs, running in parallel mode:



                          find dir_*/ -type f -name for_loop.sh -print0 | xargs -0 -r -n 1 -P 3 -t sh


                          We are asking find here to find all files with names of for_loop.sh recursively under the directories beginning with the names dir_ and pass them on to xargs, a file at a time, in parallel mode of running no more than 3 processes at any given time.



                          Use is made of the null delimiter in printing filenames by find and splitting them on nulls by xargs.






                          share|improve this answer












                          You should be passing on find's output to xargs, running in parallel mode:



                          find dir_*/ -type f -name for_loop.sh -print0 | xargs -0 -r -n 1 -P 3 -t sh


                          We are asking find here to find all files with names of for_loop.sh recursively under the directories beginning with the names dir_ and pass them on to xargs, a file at a time, in parallel mode of running no more than 3 processes at any given time.



                          Use is made of the null delimiter in printing filenames by find and splitting them on nulls by xargs.







                          share|improve this answer












                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer










                          answered May 29 '17 at 8:07







                          user218374



























                              up vote
                              2
                              down vote













                              Assuming this does the right thing - only in serial:



                              find dir_* -type f -execdir sh for_loop.sh ;


                              Then you should be able to replace that with:



                              find dir_* -type f | parallel 'cd // && sh for_loop.sh '


                              To run it in multiple terminals GNU Parallel supports tmux to run each command in its own tmux pane:



                              find dir_* -type f | parallel --tmuxpane 'cd // && sh for_loop.sh '


                              It defaults to one job per CPU core. In your case you might want to run one more job than you have cores:



                               find dir_* -type f | parallel -j+1 --tmuxpane 'cd // && sh for_loop.sh '


                              GNU Parallel is a general parallelizer and makes is easy to run jobs in parallel on the same machine or on multiple machines you have ssh access to.



                              If you have 32 different jobs you want to run on 4 CPUs, a straight forward way to parallelize is to run 8 jobs on each CPU:



                              Simple scheduling



                              GNU Parallel instead spawns a new process when one finishes - keeping the CPUs active and thus saving time:



                              GNU Parallel scheduling



                              Installation



                              For security reasons you should install GNU Parallel with your package manager, but if GNU Parallel is not packaged for your distribution, you can do a personal installation, which does not require root access. It can be done in 10 seconds by doing this:



                              (wget -O - pi.dk/3 || curl pi.dk/3/ || fetch -o - http://pi.dk/3) | bash


                              For other installation options see http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/parallel.git/tree/README



                              Learn more



                              See more examples: http://www.gnu.org/software/parallel/man.html



                              Watch the intro videos: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL284C9FF2488BC6D1



                              Walk through the tutorial: http://www.gnu.org/software/parallel/parallel_tutorial.html



                              Sign up for the email list to get support: https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/parallel






                              share|improve this answer




















                              • Off-topic: how did you produce the graphics?
                                – Nikos Alexandris
                                Aug 17 '17 at 18:23










                              • LibreOffice Draw.
                                – Ole Tange
                                Aug 18 '17 at 5:53














                              up vote
                              2
                              down vote













                              Assuming this does the right thing - only in serial:



                              find dir_* -type f -execdir sh for_loop.sh ;


                              Then you should be able to replace that with:



                              find dir_* -type f | parallel 'cd // && sh for_loop.sh '


                              To run it in multiple terminals GNU Parallel supports tmux to run each command in its own tmux pane:



                              find dir_* -type f | parallel --tmuxpane 'cd // && sh for_loop.sh '


                              It defaults to one job per CPU core. In your case you might want to run one more job than you have cores:



                               find dir_* -type f | parallel -j+1 --tmuxpane 'cd // && sh for_loop.sh '


                              GNU Parallel is a general parallelizer and makes is easy to run jobs in parallel on the same machine or on multiple machines you have ssh access to.



                              If you have 32 different jobs you want to run on 4 CPUs, a straight forward way to parallelize is to run 8 jobs on each CPU:



                              Simple scheduling



                              GNU Parallel instead spawns a new process when one finishes - keeping the CPUs active and thus saving time:



                              GNU Parallel scheduling



                              Installation



                              For security reasons you should install GNU Parallel with your package manager, but if GNU Parallel is not packaged for your distribution, you can do a personal installation, which does not require root access. It can be done in 10 seconds by doing this:



                              (wget -O - pi.dk/3 || curl pi.dk/3/ || fetch -o - http://pi.dk/3) | bash


                              For other installation options see http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/parallel.git/tree/README



                              Learn more



                              See more examples: http://www.gnu.org/software/parallel/man.html



                              Watch the intro videos: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL284C9FF2488BC6D1



                              Walk through the tutorial: http://www.gnu.org/software/parallel/parallel_tutorial.html



                              Sign up for the email list to get support: https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/parallel






                              share|improve this answer




















                              • Off-topic: how did you produce the graphics?
                                – Nikos Alexandris
                                Aug 17 '17 at 18:23










                              • LibreOffice Draw.
                                – Ole Tange
                                Aug 18 '17 at 5:53












                              up vote
                              2
                              down vote










                              up vote
                              2
                              down vote









                              Assuming this does the right thing - only in serial:



                              find dir_* -type f -execdir sh for_loop.sh ;


                              Then you should be able to replace that with:



                              find dir_* -type f | parallel 'cd // && sh for_loop.sh '


                              To run it in multiple terminals GNU Parallel supports tmux to run each command in its own tmux pane:



                              find dir_* -type f | parallel --tmuxpane 'cd // && sh for_loop.sh '


                              It defaults to one job per CPU core. In your case you might want to run one more job than you have cores:



                               find dir_* -type f | parallel -j+1 --tmuxpane 'cd // && sh for_loop.sh '


                              GNU Parallel is a general parallelizer and makes is easy to run jobs in parallel on the same machine or on multiple machines you have ssh access to.



                              If you have 32 different jobs you want to run on 4 CPUs, a straight forward way to parallelize is to run 8 jobs on each CPU:



                              Simple scheduling



                              GNU Parallel instead spawns a new process when one finishes - keeping the CPUs active and thus saving time:



                              GNU Parallel scheduling



                              Installation



                              For security reasons you should install GNU Parallel with your package manager, but if GNU Parallel is not packaged for your distribution, you can do a personal installation, which does not require root access. It can be done in 10 seconds by doing this:



                              (wget -O - pi.dk/3 || curl pi.dk/3/ || fetch -o - http://pi.dk/3) | bash


                              For other installation options see http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/parallel.git/tree/README



                              Learn more



                              See more examples: http://www.gnu.org/software/parallel/man.html



                              Watch the intro videos: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL284C9FF2488BC6D1



                              Walk through the tutorial: http://www.gnu.org/software/parallel/parallel_tutorial.html



                              Sign up for the email list to get support: https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/parallel






                              share|improve this answer












                              Assuming this does the right thing - only in serial:



                              find dir_* -type f -execdir sh for_loop.sh ;


                              Then you should be able to replace that with:



                              find dir_* -type f | parallel 'cd // && sh for_loop.sh '


                              To run it in multiple terminals GNU Parallel supports tmux to run each command in its own tmux pane:



                              find dir_* -type f | parallel --tmuxpane 'cd // && sh for_loop.sh '


                              It defaults to one job per CPU core. In your case you might want to run one more job than you have cores:



                               find dir_* -type f | parallel -j+1 --tmuxpane 'cd // && sh for_loop.sh '


                              GNU Parallel is a general parallelizer and makes is easy to run jobs in parallel on the same machine or on multiple machines you have ssh access to.



                              If you have 32 different jobs you want to run on 4 CPUs, a straight forward way to parallelize is to run 8 jobs on each CPU:



                              Simple scheduling



                              GNU Parallel instead spawns a new process when one finishes - keeping the CPUs active and thus saving time:



                              GNU Parallel scheduling



                              Installation



                              For security reasons you should install GNU Parallel with your package manager, but if GNU Parallel is not packaged for your distribution, you can do a personal installation, which does not require root access. It can be done in 10 seconds by doing this:



                              (wget -O - pi.dk/3 || curl pi.dk/3/ || fetch -o - http://pi.dk/3) | bash


                              For other installation options see http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/parallel.git/tree/README



                              Learn more



                              See more examples: http://www.gnu.org/software/parallel/man.html



                              Watch the intro videos: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL284C9FF2488BC6D1



                              Walk through the tutorial: http://www.gnu.org/software/parallel/parallel_tutorial.html



                              Sign up for the email list to get support: https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/parallel







                              share|improve this answer












                              share|improve this answer



                              share|improve this answer










                              answered May 29 '17 at 18:21









                              Ole Tange

                              11.6k1446103




                              11.6k1446103











                              • Off-topic: how did you produce the graphics?
                                – Nikos Alexandris
                                Aug 17 '17 at 18:23










                              • LibreOffice Draw.
                                – Ole Tange
                                Aug 18 '17 at 5:53
















                              • Off-topic: how did you produce the graphics?
                                – Nikos Alexandris
                                Aug 17 '17 at 18:23










                              • LibreOffice Draw.
                                – Ole Tange
                                Aug 18 '17 at 5:53















                              Off-topic: how did you produce the graphics?
                              – Nikos Alexandris
                              Aug 17 '17 at 18:23




                              Off-topic: how did you produce the graphics?
                              – Nikos Alexandris
                              Aug 17 '17 at 18:23












                              LibreOffice Draw.
                              – Ole Tange
                              Aug 18 '17 at 5:53




                              LibreOffice Draw.
                              – Ole Tange
                              Aug 18 '17 at 5:53










                              up vote
                              0
                              down vote













                              you can do from your top level directory



                              for D in `find . -type d -maxdepth 1`
                              do
                              $D/<yourScriptName>.sh &
                              done


                              the "&" is to run them in the background






                              share|improve this answer
















                              • 1




                                Like the similar answer by ChristophS, this breaks if the output from find contains whitespace or shell wildcard characters which end up not matching themselves and only themselves.
                                – tripleee
                                May 29 '17 at 13:06














                              up vote
                              0
                              down vote













                              you can do from your top level directory



                              for D in `find . -type d -maxdepth 1`
                              do
                              $D/<yourScriptName>.sh &
                              done


                              the "&" is to run them in the background






                              share|improve this answer
















                              • 1




                                Like the similar answer by ChristophS, this breaks if the output from find contains whitespace or shell wildcard characters which end up not matching themselves and only themselves.
                                – tripleee
                                May 29 '17 at 13:06












                              up vote
                              0
                              down vote










                              up vote
                              0
                              down vote









                              you can do from your top level directory



                              for D in `find . -type d -maxdepth 1`
                              do
                              $D/<yourScriptName>.sh &
                              done


                              the "&" is to run them in the background






                              share|improve this answer












                              you can do from your top level directory



                              for D in `find . -type d -maxdepth 1`
                              do
                              $D/<yourScriptName>.sh &
                              done


                              the "&" is to run them in the background







                              share|improve this answer












                              share|improve this answer



                              share|improve this answer










                              answered May 29 '17 at 7:26









                              M4rty

                              835212




                              835212







                              • 1




                                Like the similar answer by ChristophS, this breaks if the output from find contains whitespace or shell wildcard characters which end up not matching themselves and only themselves.
                                – tripleee
                                May 29 '17 at 13:06












                              • 1




                                Like the similar answer by ChristophS, this breaks if the output from find contains whitespace or shell wildcard characters which end up not matching themselves and only themselves.
                                – tripleee
                                May 29 '17 at 13:06







                              1




                              1




                              Like the similar answer by ChristophS, this breaks if the output from find contains whitespace or shell wildcard characters which end up not matching themselves and only themselves.
                              – tripleee
                              May 29 '17 at 13:06




                              Like the similar answer by ChristophS, this breaks if the output from find contains whitespace or shell wildcard characters which end up not matching themselves and only themselves.
                              – tripleee
                              May 29 '17 at 13:06

















                               

                              draft saved


                              draft discarded















































                               


                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function ()
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f367838%2frun-a-script-in-multiple-folders-in-parallel%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                              );

                              Post as a guest













































































                              Popular posts from this blog

                              How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

                              Displaying single band from multi-band raster using QGIS

                              How many registers does an x86_64 CPU actually have?