Double summation with improper integral

Multi tool use
Multi tool use

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
24
down vote

favorite
9












So my friend sent me this really interesting problem. It goes:



Evaluate the following expression:



$$ sum_a=2^infty sum_b=1^infty int_0^infty fracx^be^ax b! dx .$$



Here is my approach:



First evaluate the integral:



$$ frac1b! int_0^infty fracx^be^ax dx.$$



This can be done using integration by parts and we get:



$$ frac1b! fracba int_0^infty fracx^b-1e^ax dx.$$



We can do this $ b $ times until we get:



$$ frac1b! frac(b)(b-a).....(b-b+1)a^b int_0^infty fracx^b-be^ax dx.$$



and hence we end up with:



$$ frac1b! fracb!a^bqquadleft(frac-1 e^-axaBig|_0^inftyright) = frac1a^b+1.$$



Now we can apply the sum of GP to infinity formula and we get:



$$ sum_a=2^infty sum_b=1^infty frac1a^b+1 = sum_a=2^infty fracfrac1a^21-frac1a.$$



This is a telescoping series and we end up with $$ frac1a-1 = frac12-1 = 1.$$



Do you guys have any other ways of solving this problem? Please do share it here.










share|cite|improve this question



















  • 1




    I think this is the simplest way have you done!
    – Nosrati
    Oct 1 at 9:39






  • 6




    One approach: interchange summations and integration (allowed by Tonelli's theorem) and perform the sum's ($e^x$ and geometrical series) to end up with a simple integral.
    – Winther
    Oct 1 at 9:58














up vote
24
down vote

favorite
9












So my friend sent me this really interesting problem. It goes:



Evaluate the following expression:



$$ sum_a=2^infty sum_b=1^infty int_0^infty fracx^be^ax b! dx .$$



Here is my approach:



First evaluate the integral:



$$ frac1b! int_0^infty fracx^be^ax dx.$$



This can be done using integration by parts and we get:



$$ frac1b! fracba int_0^infty fracx^b-1e^ax dx.$$



We can do this $ b $ times until we get:



$$ frac1b! frac(b)(b-a).....(b-b+1)a^b int_0^infty fracx^b-be^ax dx.$$



and hence we end up with:



$$ frac1b! fracb!a^bqquadleft(frac-1 e^-axaBig|_0^inftyright) = frac1a^b+1.$$



Now we can apply the sum of GP to infinity formula and we get:



$$ sum_a=2^infty sum_b=1^infty frac1a^b+1 = sum_a=2^infty fracfrac1a^21-frac1a.$$



This is a telescoping series and we end up with $$ frac1a-1 = frac12-1 = 1.$$



Do you guys have any other ways of solving this problem? Please do share it here.










share|cite|improve this question



















  • 1




    I think this is the simplest way have you done!
    – Nosrati
    Oct 1 at 9:39






  • 6




    One approach: interchange summations and integration (allowed by Tonelli's theorem) and perform the sum's ($e^x$ and geometrical series) to end up with a simple integral.
    – Winther
    Oct 1 at 9:58












up vote
24
down vote

favorite
9









up vote
24
down vote

favorite
9






9





So my friend sent me this really interesting problem. It goes:



Evaluate the following expression:



$$ sum_a=2^infty sum_b=1^infty int_0^infty fracx^be^ax b! dx .$$



Here is my approach:



First evaluate the integral:



$$ frac1b! int_0^infty fracx^be^ax dx.$$



This can be done using integration by parts and we get:



$$ frac1b! fracba int_0^infty fracx^b-1e^ax dx.$$



We can do this $ b $ times until we get:



$$ frac1b! frac(b)(b-a).....(b-b+1)a^b int_0^infty fracx^b-be^ax dx.$$



and hence we end up with:



$$ frac1b! fracb!a^bqquadleft(frac-1 e^-axaBig|_0^inftyright) = frac1a^b+1.$$



Now we can apply the sum of GP to infinity formula and we get:



$$ sum_a=2^infty sum_b=1^infty frac1a^b+1 = sum_a=2^infty fracfrac1a^21-frac1a.$$



This is a telescoping series and we end up with $$ frac1a-1 = frac12-1 = 1.$$



Do you guys have any other ways of solving this problem? Please do share it here.










share|cite|improve this question















So my friend sent me this really interesting problem. It goes:



Evaluate the following expression:



$$ sum_a=2^infty sum_b=1^infty int_0^infty fracx^be^ax b! dx .$$



Here is my approach:



First evaluate the integral:



$$ frac1b! int_0^infty fracx^be^ax dx.$$



This can be done using integration by parts and we get:



$$ frac1b! fracba int_0^infty fracx^b-1e^ax dx.$$



We can do this $ b $ times until we get:



$$ frac1b! frac(b)(b-a).....(b-b+1)a^b int_0^infty fracx^b-be^ax dx.$$



and hence we end up with:



$$ frac1b! fracb!a^bqquadleft(frac-1 e^-axaBig|_0^inftyright) = frac1a^b+1.$$



Now we can apply the sum of GP to infinity formula and we get:



$$ sum_a=2^infty sum_b=1^infty frac1a^b+1 = sum_a=2^infty fracfrac1a^21-frac1a.$$



This is a telescoping series and we end up with $$ frac1a-1 = frac12-1 = 1.$$



Do you guys have any other ways of solving this problem? Please do share it here.







integration summation geometric-progressions






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Oct 2 at 6:41









manooooh

484315




484315










asked Oct 1 at 9:18









Tusky

530315




530315







  • 1




    I think this is the simplest way have you done!
    – Nosrati
    Oct 1 at 9:39






  • 6




    One approach: interchange summations and integration (allowed by Tonelli's theorem) and perform the sum's ($e^x$ and geometrical series) to end up with a simple integral.
    – Winther
    Oct 1 at 9:58












  • 1




    I think this is the simplest way have you done!
    – Nosrati
    Oct 1 at 9:39






  • 6




    One approach: interchange summations and integration (allowed by Tonelli's theorem) and perform the sum's ($e^x$ and geometrical series) to end up with a simple integral.
    – Winther
    Oct 1 at 9:58







1




1




I think this is the simplest way have you done!
– Nosrati
Oct 1 at 9:39




I think this is the simplest way have you done!
– Nosrati
Oct 1 at 9:39




6




6




One approach: interchange summations and integration (allowed by Tonelli's theorem) and perform the sum's ($e^x$ and geometrical series) to end up with a simple integral.
– Winther
Oct 1 at 9:58




One approach: interchange summations and integration (allowed by Tonelli's theorem) and perform the sum's ($e^x$ and geometrical series) to end up with a simple integral.
– Winther
Oct 1 at 9:58










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
40
down vote



accepted










since $fracx^be^ax b!$ is non-negative, Tonelli's theorem for iterated integrals/sums allows us to interchange integrals and sums without worry. Then:
beginalign
&sum_a=2^infty sum_b=1^infty int_0^infty fracx^be^ax b! dx \
&=int_0^infty sum_a=2^infty e^-ax sum_b=1^infty fracx^b b! dx \
&= int_0^infty underbraceleft(sum_a=2^infty (e^-x)^aright)_textgeometric series overbraceleft(sum_b=0^infty fracx^b b!-1right)^textseries definition of $e^x$ dx \
&= int_0^infty frac1e^x(e^x-1)(e^x-1)dx \
&= int_0^infty e^-x dx \&= 1.endalign






share|cite|improve this answer





























    up vote
    11
    down vote













    The integral is of the Gamma type,



    $$int_0^infty fracx^be^ax dx=frac1a^b+1int_0^infty t^be^-t dx =fracb!a^b+1.$$



    Then



    $$sum_a=2^infty sum_b=1^inftyfrac1a^b+1=sum_a=2^infty frac1a^2left(1-dfrac1aright)=sum_a=2^infty frac1a(a-1)$$ is indeed a telescoping sum, giving



    $$frac12-1.$$






    share|cite|improve this answer
















    • 1




      Ah, it's interesting how you were able to link the integral to the gamma function.
      – Tusky
      Oct 1 at 12:23






    • 2




      @Tusky: this is actually how the Gamma function is defined.
      – Yves Daoust
      Oct 1 at 12:27

















    up vote
    8
    down vote













    For the first part I often use the Laplace transform:
    $$frac1b! int_0^infty fracx^be^ax dx = frac1b! int_0^infty x^be^-ax dx = frac1b! cal L(x^b)Big|_s=a = frac1b! fracb!a^b+1 = frac1a^b+1$$
    this make it easier.






    share|cite|improve this answer
















    • 3




      And how do you evaluate the Laplace transform? I don't see how it's easier unless you 'cheat' and look up the result in a table.
      – Winther
      Oct 1 at 9:52






    • 4




      Laplace transform is a tool. We use it's formulas whatever we want!
      – Nosrati
      Oct 1 at 10:01










    • @Winther: there's actually a lot of ways to evaluate that. Integration by parts, differentiation under the integral sign (probably the easiest one), induction etc.
      – edmz
      Oct 1 at 18:26

















    up vote
    3
    down vote













    Also note:
    $$S=sum_a=2^inftysum_b=1^inftyint_0^inftyfracx^be^axb!dx=sum_a=2^inftysum_b=1^inftyfrac1b!int_0^infty x^be^-axdx$$
    now let:
    $$u=ax$$
    $$dx=fracdua$$
    so:
    $$S=sum_a=2^inftysum_b=1^inftyfrac1a*b!int_0^infty left(fracuaright)^be^-udu=sum_a=2^inftysum_b=1^inftyfraca^-(b+1)b!int_0^infty u^be^-udu$$
    and we know that:
    $$(n-1)!=Gamma(n)=int_0^infty e^-tt^n-1dt$$
    so our summation now simplifies to:
    $$S=sum_a=2^inftysum_b=1^inftyfraca^-(b+1)b!b!=sum_a=2^inftysum_b=1^inftyfrac1a^b+1=sum_a=2^inftysum_c=2^inftyfrac1a^c=sum_a=2^inftyleft(sum_c=1^inftyfrac1a^c-frac1aright)=sum_a=2^inftysum_c=1^inftyfrac1a^c-sum_a=2^inftyfrac1a$$
    I know this is correct up to the second summation on the final line but after this I am not sure.






    share|cite|improve this answer
















    • 1




      You definitely don't want to pull out $sum_2^infty frac1a = infty$; note that the converse of $$sum a_n < infty , sum b_n < infty implies sum (a_n + b_n) < infty$$ does not hold. Luckily you don't need to split the sum in $a$, since $$ sum_c=1^infty frac1a^c = frac1a-1 $$ so you have a telescoping sum, giving the result.
      – Calvin Khor
      Oct 2 at 20:34











    Your Answer




    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2937751%2fdouble-summation-with-improper-integral%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes








    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    40
    down vote



    accepted










    since $fracx^be^ax b!$ is non-negative, Tonelli's theorem for iterated integrals/sums allows us to interchange integrals and sums without worry. Then:
    beginalign
    &sum_a=2^infty sum_b=1^infty int_0^infty fracx^be^ax b! dx \
    &=int_0^infty sum_a=2^infty e^-ax sum_b=1^infty fracx^b b! dx \
    &= int_0^infty underbraceleft(sum_a=2^infty (e^-x)^aright)_textgeometric series overbraceleft(sum_b=0^infty fracx^b b!-1right)^textseries definition of $e^x$ dx \
    &= int_0^infty frac1e^x(e^x-1)(e^x-1)dx \
    &= int_0^infty e^-x dx \&= 1.endalign






    share|cite|improve this answer


























      up vote
      40
      down vote



      accepted










      since $fracx^be^ax b!$ is non-negative, Tonelli's theorem for iterated integrals/sums allows us to interchange integrals and sums without worry. Then:
      beginalign
      &sum_a=2^infty sum_b=1^infty int_0^infty fracx^be^ax b! dx \
      &=int_0^infty sum_a=2^infty e^-ax sum_b=1^infty fracx^b b! dx \
      &= int_0^infty underbraceleft(sum_a=2^infty (e^-x)^aright)_textgeometric series overbraceleft(sum_b=0^infty fracx^b b!-1right)^textseries definition of $e^x$ dx \
      &= int_0^infty frac1e^x(e^x-1)(e^x-1)dx \
      &= int_0^infty e^-x dx \&= 1.endalign






      share|cite|improve this answer
























        up vote
        40
        down vote



        accepted







        up vote
        40
        down vote



        accepted






        since $fracx^be^ax b!$ is non-negative, Tonelli's theorem for iterated integrals/sums allows us to interchange integrals and sums without worry. Then:
        beginalign
        &sum_a=2^infty sum_b=1^infty int_0^infty fracx^be^ax b! dx \
        &=int_0^infty sum_a=2^infty e^-ax sum_b=1^infty fracx^b b! dx \
        &= int_0^infty underbraceleft(sum_a=2^infty (e^-x)^aright)_textgeometric series overbraceleft(sum_b=0^infty fracx^b b!-1right)^textseries definition of $e^x$ dx \
        &= int_0^infty frac1e^x(e^x-1)(e^x-1)dx \
        &= int_0^infty e^-x dx \&= 1.endalign






        share|cite|improve this answer














        since $fracx^be^ax b!$ is non-negative, Tonelli's theorem for iterated integrals/sums allows us to interchange integrals and sums without worry. Then:
        beginalign
        &sum_a=2^infty sum_b=1^infty int_0^infty fracx^be^ax b! dx \
        &=int_0^infty sum_a=2^infty e^-ax sum_b=1^infty fracx^b b! dx \
        &= int_0^infty underbraceleft(sum_a=2^infty (e^-x)^aright)_textgeometric series overbraceleft(sum_b=0^infty fracx^b b!-1right)^textseries definition of $e^x$ dx \
        &= int_0^infty frac1e^x(e^x-1)(e^x-1)dx \
        &= int_0^infty e^-x dx \&= 1.endalign







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Oct 1 at 10:08

























        answered Oct 1 at 10:01









        Calvin Khor

        9,79521434




        9,79521434




















            up vote
            11
            down vote













            The integral is of the Gamma type,



            $$int_0^infty fracx^be^ax dx=frac1a^b+1int_0^infty t^be^-t dx =fracb!a^b+1.$$



            Then



            $$sum_a=2^infty sum_b=1^inftyfrac1a^b+1=sum_a=2^infty frac1a^2left(1-dfrac1aright)=sum_a=2^infty frac1a(a-1)$$ is indeed a telescoping sum, giving



            $$frac12-1.$$






            share|cite|improve this answer
















            • 1




              Ah, it's interesting how you were able to link the integral to the gamma function.
              – Tusky
              Oct 1 at 12:23






            • 2




              @Tusky: this is actually how the Gamma function is defined.
              – Yves Daoust
              Oct 1 at 12:27














            up vote
            11
            down vote













            The integral is of the Gamma type,



            $$int_0^infty fracx^be^ax dx=frac1a^b+1int_0^infty t^be^-t dx =fracb!a^b+1.$$



            Then



            $$sum_a=2^infty sum_b=1^inftyfrac1a^b+1=sum_a=2^infty frac1a^2left(1-dfrac1aright)=sum_a=2^infty frac1a(a-1)$$ is indeed a telescoping sum, giving



            $$frac12-1.$$






            share|cite|improve this answer
















            • 1




              Ah, it's interesting how you were able to link the integral to the gamma function.
              – Tusky
              Oct 1 at 12:23






            • 2




              @Tusky: this is actually how the Gamma function is defined.
              – Yves Daoust
              Oct 1 at 12:27












            up vote
            11
            down vote










            up vote
            11
            down vote









            The integral is of the Gamma type,



            $$int_0^infty fracx^be^ax dx=frac1a^b+1int_0^infty t^be^-t dx =fracb!a^b+1.$$



            Then



            $$sum_a=2^infty sum_b=1^inftyfrac1a^b+1=sum_a=2^infty frac1a^2left(1-dfrac1aright)=sum_a=2^infty frac1a(a-1)$$ is indeed a telescoping sum, giving



            $$frac12-1.$$






            share|cite|improve this answer












            The integral is of the Gamma type,



            $$int_0^infty fracx^be^ax dx=frac1a^b+1int_0^infty t^be^-t dx =fracb!a^b+1.$$



            Then



            $$sum_a=2^infty sum_b=1^inftyfrac1a^b+1=sum_a=2^infty frac1a^2left(1-dfrac1aright)=sum_a=2^infty frac1a(a-1)$$ is indeed a telescoping sum, giving



            $$frac12-1.$$







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Oct 1 at 10:28









            Yves Daoust

            117k667213




            117k667213







            • 1




              Ah, it's interesting how you were able to link the integral to the gamma function.
              – Tusky
              Oct 1 at 12:23






            • 2




              @Tusky: this is actually how the Gamma function is defined.
              – Yves Daoust
              Oct 1 at 12:27












            • 1




              Ah, it's interesting how you were able to link the integral to the gamma function.
              – Tusky
              Oct 1 at 12:23






            • 2




              @Tusky: this is actually how the Gamma function is defined.
              – Yves Daoust
              Oct 1 at 12:27







            1




            1




            Ah, it's interesting how you were able to link the integral to the gamma function.
            – Tusky
            Oct 1 at 12:23




            Ah, it's interesting how you were able to link the integral to the gamma function.
            – Tusky
            Oct 1 at 12:23




            2




            2




            @Tusky: this is actually how the Gamma function is defined.
            – Yves Daoust
            Oct 1 at 12:27




            @Tusky: this is actually how the Gamma function is defined.
            – Yves Daoust
            Oct 1 at 12:27










            up vote
            8
            down vote













            For the first part I often use the Laplace transform:
            $$frac1b! int_0^infty fracx^be^ax dx = frac1b! int_0^infty x^be^-ax dx = frac1b! cal L(x^b)Big|_s=a = frac1b! fracb!a^b+1 = frac1a^b+1$$
            this make it easier.






            share|cite|improve this answer
















            • 3




              And how do you evaluate the Laplace transform? I don't see how it's easier unless you 'cheat' and look up the result in a table.
              – Winther
              Oct 1 at 9:52






            • 4




              Laplace transform is a tool. We use it's formulas whatever we want!
              – Nosrati
              Oct 1 at 10:01










            • @Winther: there's actually a lot of ways to evaluate that. Integration by parts, differentiation under the integral sign (probably the easiest one), induction etc.
              – edmz
              Oct 1 at 18:26














            up vote
            8
            down vote













            For the first part I often use the Laplace transform:
            $$frac1b! int_0^infty fracx^be^ax dx = frac1b! int_0^infty x^be^-ax dx = frac1b! cal L(x^b)Big|_s=a = frac1b! fracb!a^b+1 = frac1a^b+1$$
            this make it easier.






            share|cite|improve this answer
















            • 3




              And how do you evaluate the Laplace transform? I don't see how it's easier unless you 'cheat' and look up the result in a table.
              – Winther
              Oct 1 at 9:52






            • 4




              Laplace transform is a tool. We use it's formulas whatever we want!
              – Nosrati
              Oct 1 at 10:01










            • @Winther: there's actually a lot of ways to evaluate that. Integration by parts, differentiation under the integral sign (probably the easiest one), induction etc.
              – edmz
              Oct 1 at 18:26












            up vote
            8
            down vote










            up vote
            8
            down vote









            For the first part I often use the Laplace transform:
            $$frac1b! int_0^infty fracx^be^ax dx = frac1b! int_0^infty x^be^-ax dx = frac1b! cal L(x^b)Big|_s=a = frac1b! fracb!a^b+1 = frac1a^b+1$$
            this make it easier.






            share|cite|improve this answer












            For the first part I often use the Laplace transform:
            $$frac1b! int_0^infty fracx^be^ax dx = frac1b! int_0^infty x^be^-ax dx = frac1b! cal L(x^b)Big|_s=a = frac1b! fracb!a^b+1 = frac1a^b+1$$
            this make it easier.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Oct 1 at 9:50









            Nosrati

            23.7k61952




            23.7k61952







            • 3




              And how do you evaluate the Laplace transform? I don't see how it's easier unless you 'cheat' and look up the result in a table.
              – Winther
              Oct 1 at 9:52






            • 4




              Laplace transform is a tool. We use it's formulas whatever we want!
              – Nosrati
              Oct 1 at 10:01










            • @Winther: there's actually a lot of ways to evaluate that. Integration by parts, differentiation under the integral sign (probably the easiest one), induction etc.
              – edmz
              Oct 1 at 18:26












            • 3




              And how do you evaluate the Laplace transform? I don't see how it's easier unless you 'cheat' and look up the result in a table.
              – Winther
              Oct 1 at 9:52






            • 4




              Laplace transform is a tool. We use it's formulas whatever we want!
              – Nosrati
              Oct 1 at 10:01










            • @Winther: there's actually a lot of ways to evaluate that. Integration by parts, differentiation under the integral sign (probably the easiest one), induction etc.
              – edmz
              Oct 1 at 18:26







            3




            3




            And how do you evaluate the Laplace transform? I don't see how it's easier unless you 'cheat' and look up the result in a table.
            – Winther
            Oct 1 at 9:52




            And how do you evaluate the Laplace transform? I don't see how it's easier unless you 'cheat' and look up the result in a table.
            – Winther
            Oct 1 at 9:52




            4




            4




            Laplace transform is a tool. We use it's formulas whatever we want!
            – Nosrati
            Oct 1 at 10:01




            Laplace transform is a tool. We use it's formulas whatever we want!
            – Nosrati
            Oct 1 at 10:01












            @Winther: there's actually a lot of ways to evaluate that. Integration by parts, differentiation under the integral sign (probably the easiest one), induction etc.
            – edmz
            Oct 1 at 18:26




            @Winther: there's actually a lot of ways to evaluate that. Integration by parts, differentiation under the integral sign (probably the easiest one), induction etc.
            – edmz
            Oct 1 at 18:26










            up vote
            3
            down vote













            Also note:
            $$S=sum_a=2^inftysum_b=1^inftyint_0^inftyfracx^be^axb!dx=sum_a=2^inftysum_b=1^inftyfrac1b!int_0^infty x^be^-axdx$$
            now let:
            $$u=ax$$
            $$dx=fracdua$$
            so:
            $$S=sum_a=2^inftysum_b=1^inftyfrac1a*b!int_0^infty left(fracuaright)^be^-udu=sum_a=2^inftysum_b=1^inftyfraca^-(b+1)b!int_0^infty u^be^-udu$$
            and we know that:
            $$(n-1)!=Gamma(n)=int_0^infty e^-tt^n-1dt$$
            so our summation now simplifies to:
            $$S=sum_a=2^inftysum_b=1^inftyfraca^-(b+1)b!b!=sum_a=2^inftysum_b=1^inftyfrac1a^b+1=sum_a=2^inftysum_c=2^inftyfrac1a^c=sum_a=2^inftyleft(sum_c=1^inftyfrac1a^c-frac1aright)=sum_a=2^inftysum_c=1^inftyfrac1a^c-sum_a=2^inftyfrac1a$$
            I know this is correct up to the second summation on the final line but after this I am not sure.






            share|cite|improve this answer
















            • 1




              You definitely don't want to pull out $sum_2^infty frac1a = infty$; note that the converse of $$sum a_n < infty , sum b_n < infty implies sum (a_n + b_n) < infty$$ does not hold. Luckily you don't need to split the sum in $a$, since $$ sum_c=1^infty frac1a^c = frac1a-1 $$ so you have a telescoping sum, giving the result.
              – Calvin Khor
              Oct 2 at 20:34















            up vote
            3
            down vote













            Also note:
            $$S=sum_a=2^inftysum_b=1^inftyint_0^inftyfracx^be^axb!dx=sum_a=2^inftysum_b=1^inftyfrac1b!int_0^infty x^be^-axdx$$
            now let:
            $$u=ax$$
            $$dx=fracdua$$
            so:
            $$S=sum_a=2^inftysum_b=1^inftyfrac1a*b!int_0^infty left(fracuaright)^be^-udu=sum_a=2^inftysum_b=1^inftyfraca^-(b+1)b!int_0^infty u^be^-udu$$
            and we know that:
            $$(n-1)!=Gamma(n)=int_0^infty e^-tt^n-1dt$$
            so our summation now simplifies to:
            $$S=sum_a=2^inftysum_b=1^inftyfraca^-(b+1)b!b!=sum_a=2^inftysum_b=1^inftyfrac1a^b+1=sum_a=2^inftysum_c=2^inftyfrac1a^c=sum_a=2^inftyleft(sum_c=1^inftyfrac1a^c-frac1aright)=sum_a=2^inftysum_c=1^inftyfrac1a^c-sum_a=2^inftyfrac1a$$
            I know this is correct up to the second summation on the final line but after this I am not sure.






            share|cite|improve this answer
















            • 1




              You definitely don't want to pull out $sum_2^infty frac1a = infty$; note that the converse of $$sum a_n < infty , sum b_n < infty implies sum (a_n + b_n) < infty$$ does not hold. Luckily you don't need to split the sum in $a$, since $$ sum_c=1^infty frac1a^c = frac1a-1 $$ so you have a telescoping sum, giving the result.
              – Calvin Khor
              Oct 2 at 20:34













            up vote
            3
            down vote










            up vote
            3
            down vote









            Also note:
            $$S=sum_a=2^inftysum_b=1^inftyint_0^inftyfracx^be^axb!dx=sum_a=2^inftysum_b=1^inftyfrac1b!int_0^infty x^be^-axdx$$
            now let:
            $$u=ax$$
            $$dx=fracdua$$
            so:
            $$S=sum_a=2^inftysum_b=1^inftyfrac1a*b!int_0^infty left(fracuaright)^be^-udu=sum_a=2^inftysum_b=1^inftyfraca^-(b+1)b!int_0^infty u^be^-udu$$
            and we know that:
            $$(n-1)!=Gamma(n)=int_0^infty e^-tt^n-1dt$$
            so our summation now simplifies to:
            $$S=sum_a=2^inftysum_b=1^inftyfraca^-(b+1)b!b!=sum_a=2^inftysum_b=1^inftyfrac1a^b+1=sum_a=2^inftysum_c=2^inftyfrac1a^c=sum_a=2^inftyleft(sum_c=1^inftyfrac1a^c-frac1aright)=sum_a=2^inftysum_c=1^inftyfrac1a^c-sum_a=2^inftyfrac1a$$
            I know this is correct up to the second summation on the final line but after this I am not sure.






            share|cite|improve this answer












            Also note:
            $$S=sum_a=2^inftysum_b=1^inftyint_0^inftyfracx^be^axb!dx=sum_a=2^inftysum_b=1^inftyfrac1b!int_0^infty x^be^-axdx$$
            now let:
            $$u=ax$$
            $$dx=fracdua$$
            so:
            $$S=sum_a=2^inftysum_b=1^inftyfrac1a*b!int_0^infty left(fracuaright)^be^-udu=sum_a=2^inftysum_b=1^inftyfraca^-(b+1)b!int_0^infty u^be^-udu$$
            and we know that:
            $$(n-1)!=Gamma(n)=int_0^infty e^-tt^n-1dt$$
            so our summation now simplifies to:
            $$S=sum_a=2^inftysum_b=1^inftyfraca^-(b+1)b!b!=sum_a=2^inftysum_b=1^inftyfrac1a^b+1=sum_a=2^inftysum_c=2^inftyfrac1a^c=sum_a=2^inftyleft(sum_c=1^inftyfrac1a^c-frac1aright)=sum_a=2^inftysum_c=1^inftyfrac1a^c-sum_a=2^inftyfrac1a$$
            I know this is correct up to the second summation on the final line but after this I am not sure.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Oct 1 at 23:55









            Henry Lee

            1,08815




            1,08815







            • 1




              You definitely don't want to pull out $sum_2^infty frac1a = infty$; note that the converse of $$sum a_n < infty , sum b_n < infty implies sum (a_n + b_n) < infty$$ does not hold. Luckily you don't need to split the sum in $a$, since $$ sum_c=1^infty frac1a^c = frac1a-1 $$ so you have a telescoping sum, giving the result.
              – Calvin Khor
              Oct 2 at 20:34













            • 1




              You definitely don't want to pull out $sum_2^infty frac1a = infty$; note that the converse of $$sum a_n < infty , sum b_n < infty implies sum (a_n + b_n) < infty$$ does not hold. Luckily you don't need to split the sum in $a$, since $$ sum_c=1^infty frac1a^c = frac1a-1 $$ so you have a telescoping sum, giving the result.
              – Calvin Khor
              Oct 2 at 20:34








            1




            1




            You definitely don't want to pull out $sum_2^infty frac1a = infty$; note that the converse of $$sum a_n < infty , sum b_n < infty implies sum (a_n + b_n) < infty$$ does not hold. Luckily you don't need to split the sum in $a$, since $$ sum_c=1^infty frac1a^c = frac1a-1 $$ so you have a telescoping sum, giving the result.
            – Calvin Khor
            Oct 2 at 20:34





            You definitely don't want to pull out $sum_2^infty frac1a = infty$; note that the converse of $$sum a_n < infty , sum b_n < infty implies sum (a_n + b_n) < infty$$ does not hold. Luckily you don't need to split the sum in $a$, since $$ sum_c=1^infty frac1a^c = frac1a-1 $$ so you have a telescoping sum, giving the result.
            – Calvin Khor
            Oct 2 at 20:34


















             

            draft saved


            draft discarded















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2937751%2fdouble-summation-with-improper-integral%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest













































































            vGss Kg,8laWipa4gNuKWKd u QnqG9p4 FVaktPc8is6fxb,6q0XoAt4hA
            LjDapyBnzl03 nQ7o i,B0 mG tmaaBtT

            Popular posts from this blog

            How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

            How many registers does an x86_64 CPU actually have?

            Displaying single band from multi-band raster using QGIS