Double summation with improper integral
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
24
down vote
favorite
So my friend sent me this really interesting problem. It goes:
Evaluate the following expression:
$$ sum_a=2^infty sum_b=1^infty int_0^infty fracx^be^ax b! dx .$$
Here is my approach:
First evaluate the integral:
$$ frac1b! int_0^infty fracx^be^ax dx.$$
This can be done using integration by parts and we get:
$$ frac1b! fracba int_0^infty fracx^b-1e^ax dx.$$
We can do this $ b $ times until we get:
$$ frac1b! frac(b)(b-a).....(b-b+1)a^b int_0^infty fracx^b-be^ax dx.$$
and hence we end up with:
$$ frac1b! fracb!a^bqquadleft(frac-1 e^-axaBig|_0^inftyright) = frac1a^b+1.$$
Now we can apply the sum of GP to infinity formula and we get:
$$ sum_a=2^infty sum_b=1^infty frac1a^b+1 = sum_a=2^infty fracfrac1a^21-frac1a.$$
This is a telescoping series and we end up with $$ frac1a-1 = frac12-1 = 1.$$
Do you guys have any other ways of solving this problem? Please do share it here.
integration summation geometric-progressions
add a comment |Â
up vote
24
down vote
favorite
So my friend sent me this really interesting problem. It goes:
Evaluate the following expression:
$$ sum_a=2^infty sum_b=1^infty int_0^infty fracx^be^ax b! dx .$$
Here is my approach:
First evaluate the integral:
$$ frac1b! int_0^infty fracx^be^ax dx.$$
This can be done using integration by parts and we get:
$$ frac1b! fracba int_0^infty fracx^b-1e^ax dx.$$
We can do this $ b $ times until we get:
$$ frac1b! frac(b)(b-a).....(b-b+1)a^b int_0^infty fracx^b-be^ax dx.$$
and hence we end up with:
$$ frac1b! fracb!a^bqquadleft(frac-1 e^-axaBig|_0^inftyright) = frac1a^b+1.$$
Now we can apply the sum of GP to infinity formula and we get:
$$ sum_a=2^infty sum_b=1^infty frac1a^b+1 = sum_a=2^infty fracfrac1a^21-frac1a.$$
This is a telescoping series and we end up with $$ frac1a-1 = frac12-1 = 1.$$
Do you guys have any other ways of solving this problem? Please do share it here.
integration summation geometric-progressions
1
I think this is the simplest way have you done!
â Nosrati
Oct 1 at 9:39
6
One approach: interchange summations and integration (allowed by Tonelli's theorem) and perform the sum's ($e^x$ and geometrical series) to end up with a simple integral.
â Winther
Oct 1 at 9:58
add a comment |Â
up vote
24
down vote
favorite
up vote
24
down vote
favorite
So my friend sent me this really interesting problem. It goes:
Evaluate the following expression:
$$ sum_a=2^infty sum_b=1^infty int_0^infty fracx^be^ax b! dx .$$
Here is my approach:
First evaluate the integral:
$$ frac1b! int_0^infty fracx^be^ax dx.$$
This can be done using integration by parts and we get:
$$ frac1b! fracba int_0^infty fracx^b-1e^ax dx.$$
We can do this $ b $ times until we get:
$$ frac1b! frac(b)(b-a).....(b-b+1)a^b int_0^infty fracx^b-be^ax dx.$$
and hence we end up with:
$$ frac1b! fracb!a^bqquadleft(frac-1 e^-axaBig|_0^inftyright) = frac1a^b+1.$$
Now we can apply the sum of GP to infinity formula and we get:
$$ sum_a=2^infty sum_b=1^infty frac1a^b+1 = sum_a=2^infty fracfrac1a^21-frac1a.$$
This is a telescoping series and we end up with $$ frac1a-1 = frac12-1 = 1.$$
Do you guys have any other ways of solving this problem? Please do share it here.
integration summation geometric-progressions
So my friend sent me this really interesting problem. It goes:
Evaluate the following expression:
$$ sum_a=2^infty sum_b=1^infty int_0^infty fracx^be^ax b! dx .$$
Here is my approach:
First evaluate the integral:
$$ frac1b! int_0^infty fracx^be^ax dx.$$
This can be done using integration by parts and we get:
$$ frac1b! fracba int_0^infty fracx^b-1e^ax dx.$$
We can do this $ b $ times until we get:
$$ frac1b! frac(b)(b-a).....(b-b+1)a^b int_0^infty fracx^b-be^ax dx.$$
and hence we end up with:
$$ frac1b! fracb!a^bqquadleft(frac-1 e^-axaBig|_0^inftyright) = frac1a^b+1.$$
Now we can apply the sum of GP to infinity formula and we get:
$$ sum_a=2^infty sum_b=1^infty frac1a^b+1 = sum_a=2^infty fracfrac1a^21-frac1a.$$
This is a telescoping series and we end up with $$ frac1a-1 = frac12-1 = 1.$$
Do you guys have any other ways of solving this problem? Please do share it here.
integration summation geometric-progressions
integration summation geometric-progressions
edited Oct 2 at 6:41
manooooh
484315
484315
asked Oct 1 at 9:18
Tusky
530315
530315
1
I think this is the simplest way have you done!
â Nosrati
Oct 1 at 9:39
6
One approach: interchange summations and integration (allowed by Tonelli's theorem) and perform the sum's ($e^x$ and geometrical series) to end up with a simple integral.
â Winther
Oct 1 at 9:58
add a comment |Â
1
I think this is the simplest way have you done!
â Nosrati
Oct 1 at 9:39
6
One approach: interchange summations and integration (allowed by Tonelli's theorem) and perform the sum's ($e^x$ and geometrical series) to end up with a simple integral.
â Winther
Oct 1 at 9:58
1
1
I think this is the simplest way have you done!
â Nosrati
Oct 1 at 9:39
I think this is the simplest way have you done!
â Nosrati
Oct 1 at 9:39
6
6
One approach: interchange summations and integration (allowed by Tonelli's theorem) and perform the sum's ($e^x$ and geometrical series) to end up with a simple integral.
â Winther
Oct 1 at 9:58
One approach: interchange summations and integration (allowed by Tonelli's theorem) and perform the sum's ($e^x$ and geometrical series) to end up with a simple integral.
â Winther
Oct 1 at 9:58
add a comment |Â
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
up vote
40
down vote
accepted
since $fracx^be^ax b!$ is non-negative, Tonelli's theorem for iterated integrals/sums allows us to interchange integrals and sums without worry. Then:
beginalign
&sum_a=2^infty sum_b=1^infty int_0^infty fracx^be^ax b! dx \
&=int_0^infty sum_a=2^infty e^-ax sum_b=1^infty fracx^b b! dx \
&= int_0^infty underbraceleft(sum_a=2^infty (e^-x)^aright)_textgeometric series overbraceleft(sum_b=0^infty fracx^b b!-1right)^textseries definition of $e^x$ dx \
&= int_0^infty frac1e^x(e^x-1)(e^x-1)dx \
&= int_0^infty e^-x dx \&= 1.endalign
add a comment |Â
up vote
11
down vote
The integral is of the Gamma type,
$$int_0^infty fracx^be^ax dx=frac1a^b+1int_0^infty t^be^-t dx =fracb!a^b+1.$$
Then
$$sum_a=2^infty sum_b=1^inftyfrac1a^b+1=sum_a=2^infty frac1a^2left(1-dfrac1aright)=sum_a=2^infty frac1a(a-1)$$ is indeed a telescoping sum, giving
$$frac12-1.$$
1
Ah, it's interesting how you were able to link the integral to the gamma function.
â Tusky
Oct 1 at 12:23
2
@Tusky: this is actually how the Gamma function is defined.
â Yves Daoust
Oct 1 at 12:27
add a comment |Â
up vote
8
down vote
For the first part I often use the Laplace transform:
$$frac1b! int_0^infty fracx^be^ax dx = frac1b! int_0^infty x^be^-ax dx = frac1b! cal L(x^b)Big|_s=a = frac1b! fracb!a^b+1 = frac1a^b+1$$
this make it easier.
3
And how do you evaluate the Laplace transform? I don't see how it's easier unless you 'cheat' and look up the result in a table.
â Winther
Oct 1 at 9:52
4
Laplace transform is a tool. We use it's formulas whatever we want!
â Nosrati
Oct 1 at 10:01
@Winther: there's actually a lot of ways to evaluate that. Integration by parts, differentiation under the integral sign (probably the easiest one), induction etc.
â edmz
Oct 1 at 18:26
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
Also note:
$$S=sum_a=2^inftysum_b=1^inftyint_0^inftyfracx^be^axb!dx=sum_a=2^inftysum_b=1^inftyfrac1b!int_0^infty x^be^-axdx$$
now let:
$$u=ax$$
$$dx=fracdua$$
so:
$$S=sum_a=2^inftysum_b=1^inftyfrac1a*b!int_0^infty left(fracuaright)^be^-udu=sum_a=2^inftysum_b=1^inftyfraca^-(b+1)b!int_0^infty u^be^-udu$$
and we know that:
$$(n-1)!=Gamma(n)=int_0^infty e^-tt^n-1dt$$
so our summation now simplifies to:
$$S=sum_a=2^inftysum_b=1^inftyfraca^-(b+1)b!b!=sum_a=2^inftysum_b=1^inftyfrac1a^b+1=sum_a=2^inftysum_c=2^inftyfrac1a^c=sum_a=2^inftyleft(sum_c=1^inftyfrac1a^c-frac1aright)=sum_a=2^inftysum_c=1^inftyfrac1a^c-sum_a=2^inftyfrac1a$$
I know this is correct up to the second summation on the final line but after this I am not sure.
1
You definitely don't want to pull out $sum_2^infty frac1a = infty$; note that the converse of $$sum a_n < infty , sum b_n < infty implies sum (a_n + b_n) < infty$$ does not hold. Luckily you don't need to split the sum in $a$, since $$ sum_c=1^infty frac1a^c = frac1a-1 $$ so you have a telescoping sum, giving the result.
â Calvin Khor
Oct 2 at 20:34
add a comment |Â
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
40
down vote
accepted
since $fracx^be^ax b!$ is non-negative, Tonelli's theorem for iterated integrals/sums allows us to interchange integrals and sums without worry. Then:
beginalign
&sum_a=2^infty sum_b=1^infty int_0^infty fracx^be^ax b! dx \
&=int_0^infty sum_a=2^infty e^-ax sum_b=1^infty fracx^b b! dx \
&= int_0^infty underbraceleft(sum_a=2^infty (e^-x)^aright)_textgeometric series overbraceleft(sum_b=0^infty fracx^b b!-1right)^textseries definition of $e^x$ dx \
&= int_0^infty frac1e^x(e^x-1)(e^x-1)dx \
&= int_0^infty e^-x dx \&= 1.endalign
add a comment |Â
up vote
40
down vote
accepted
since $fracx^be^ax b!$ is non-negative, Tonelli's theorem for iterated integrals/sums allows us to interchange integrals and sums without worry. Then:
beginalign
&sum_a=2^infty sum_b=1^infty int_0^infty fracx^be^ax b! dx \
&=int_0^infty sum_a=2^infty e^-ax sum_b=1^infty fracx^b b! dx \
&= int_0^infty underbraceleft(sum_a=2^infty (e^-x)^aright)_textgeometric series overbraceleft(sum_b=0^infty fracx^b b!-1right)^textseries definition of $e^x$ dx \
&= int_0^infty frac1e^x(e^x-1)(e^x-1)dx \
&= int_0^infty e^-x dx \&= 1.endalign
add a comment |Â
up vote
40
down vote
accepted
up vote
40
down vote
accepted
since $fracx^be^ax b!$ is non-negative, Tonelli's theorem for iterated integrals/sums allows us to interchange integrals and sums without worry. Then:
beginalign
&sum_a=2^infty sum_b=1^infty int_0^infty fracx^be^ax b! dx \
&=int_0^infty sum_a=2^infty e^-ax sum_b=1^infty fracx^b b! dx \
&= int_0^infty underbraceleft(sum_a=2^infty (e^-x)^aright)_textgeometric series overbraceleft(sum_b=0^infty fracx^b b!-1right)^textseries definition of $e^x$ dx \
&= int_0^infty frac1e^x(e^x-1)(e^x-1)dx \
&= int_0^infty e^-x dx \&= 1.endalign
since $fracx^be^ax b!$ is non-negative, Tonelli's theorem for iterated integrals/sums allows us to interchange integrals and sums without worry. Then:
beginalign
&sum_a=2^infty sum_b=1^infty int_0^infty fracx^be^ax b! dx \
&=int_0^infty sum_a=2^infty e^-ax sum_b=1^infty fracx^b b! dx \
&= int_0^infty underbraceleft(sum_a=2^infty (e^-x)^aright)_textgeometric series overbraceleft(sum_b=0^infty fracx^b b!-1right)^textseries definition of $e^x$ dx \
&= int_0^infty frac1e^x(e^x-1)(e^x-1)dx \
&= int_0^infty e^-x dx \&= 1.endalign
edited Oct 1 at 10:08
answered Oct 1 at 10:01
Calvin Khor
9,79521434
9,79521434
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
11
down vote
The integral is of the Gamma type,
$$int_0^infty fracx^be^ax dx=frac1a^b+1int_0^infty t^be^-t dx =fracb!a^b+1.$$
Then
$$sum_a=2^infty sum_b=1^inftyfrac1a^b+1=sum_a=2^infty frac1a^2left(1-dfrac1aright)=sum_a=2^infty frac1a(a-1)$$ is indeed a telescoping sum, giving
$$frac12-1.$$
1
Ah, it's interesting how you were able to link the integral to the gamma function.
â Tusky
Oct 1 at 12:23
2
@Tusky: this is actually how the Gamma function is defined.
â Yves Daoust
Oct 1 at 12:27
add a comment |Â
up vote
11
down vote
The integral is of the Gamma type,
$$int_0^infty fracx^be^ax dx=frac1a^b+1int_0^infty t^be^-t dx =fracb!a^b+1.$$
Then
$$sum_a=2^infty sum_b=1^inftyfrac1a^b+1=sum_a=2^infty frac1a^2left(1-dfrac1aright)=sum_a=2^infty frac1a(a-1)$$ is indeed a telescoping sum, giving
$$frac12-1.$$
1
Ah, it's interesting how you were able to link the integral to the gamma function.
â Tusky
Oct 1 at 12:23
2
@Tusky: this is actually how the Gamma function is defined.
â Yves Daoust
Oct 1 at 12:27
add a comment |Â
up vote
11
down vote
up vote
11
down vote
The integral is of the Gamma type,
$$int_0^infty fracx^be^ax dx=frac1a^b+1int_0^infty t^be^-t dx =fracb!a^b+1.$$
Then
$$sum_a=2^infty sum_b=1^inftyfrac1a^b+1=sum_a=2^infty frac1a^2left(1-dfrac1aright)=sum_a=2^infty frac1a(a-1)$$ is indeed a telescoping sum, giving
$$frac12-1.$$
The integral is of the Gamma type,
$$int_0^infty fracx^be^ax dx=frac1a^b+1int_0^infty t^be^-t dx =fracb!a^b+1.$$
Then
$$sum_a=2^infty sum_b=1^inftyfrac1a^b+1=sum_a=2^infty frac1a^2left(1-dfrac1aright)=sum_a=2^infty frac1a(a-1)$$ is indeed a telescoping sum, giving
$$frac12-1.$$
answered Oct 1 at 10:28
Yves Daoust
117k667213
117k667213
1
Ah, it's interesting how you were able to link the integral to the gamma function.
â Tusky
Oct 1 at 12:23
2
@Tusky: this is actually how the Gamma function is defined.
â Yves Daoust
Oct 1 at 12:27
add a comment |Â
1
Ah, it's interesting how you were able to link the integral to the gamma function.
â Tusky
Oct 1 at 12:23
2
@Tusky: this is actually how the Gamma function is defined.
â Yves Daoust
Oct 1 at 12:27
1
1
Ah, it's interesting how you were able to link the integral to the gamma function.
â Tusky
Oct 1 at 12:23
Ah, it's interesting how you were able to link the integral to the gamma function.
â Tusky
Oct 1 at 12:23
2
2
@Tusky: this is actually how the Gamma function is defined.
â Yves Daoust
Oct 1 at 12:27
@Tusky: this is actually how the Gamma function is defined.
â Yves Daoust
Oct 1 at 12:27
add a comment |Â
up vote
8
down vote
For the first part I often use the Laplace transform:
$$frac1b! int_0^infty fracx^be^ax dx = frac1b! int_0^infty x^be^-ax dx = frac1b! cal L(x^b)Big|_s=a = frac1b! fracb!a^b+1 = frac1a^b+1$$
this make it easier.
3
And how do you evaluate the Laplace transform? I don't see how it's easier unless you 'cheat' and look up the result in a table.
â Winther
Oct 1 at 9:52
4
Laplace transform is a tool. We use it's formulas whatever we want!
â Nosrati
Oct 1 at 10:01
@Winther: there's actually a lot of ways to evaluate that. Integration by parts, differentiation under the integral sign (probably the easiest one), induction etc.
â edmz
Oct 1 at 18:26
add a comment |Â
up vote
8
down vote
For the first part I often use the Laplace transform:
$$frac1b! int_0^infty fracx^be^ax dx = frac1b! int_0^infty x^be^-ax dx = frac1b! cal L(x^b)Big|_s=a = frac1b! fracb!a^b+1 = frac1a^b+1$$
this make it easier.
3
And how do you evaluate the Laplace transform? I don't see how it's easier unless you 'cheat' and look up the result in a table.
â Winther
Oct 1 at 9:52
4
Laplace transform is a tool. We use it's formulas whatever we want!
â Nosrati
Oct 1 at 10:01
@Winther: there's actually a lot of ways to evaluate that. Integration by parts, differentiation under the integral sign (probably the easiest one), induction etc.
â edmz
Oct 1 at 18:26
add a comment |Â
up vote
8
down vote
up vote
8
down vote
For the first part I often use the Laplace transform:
$$frac1b! int_0^infty fracx^be^ax dx = frac1b! int_0^infty x^be^-ax dx = frac1b! cal L(x^b)Big|_s=a = frac1b! fracb!a^b+1 = frac1a^b+1$$
this make it easier.
For the first part I often use the Laplace transform:
$$frac1b! int_0^infty fracx^be^ax dx = frac1b! int_0^infty x^be^-ax dx = frac1b! cal L(x^b)Big|_s=a = frac1b! fracb!a^b+1 = frac1a^b+1$$
this make it easier.
answered Oct 1 at 9:50
Nosrati
23.7k61952
23.7k61952
3
And how do you evaluate the Laplace transform? I don't see how it's easier unless you 'cheat' and look up the result in a table.
â Winther
Oct 1 at 9:52
4
Laplace transform is a tool. We use it's formulas whatever we want!
â Nosrati
Oct 1 at 10:01
@Winther: there's actually a lot of ways to evaluate that. Integration by parts, differentiation under the integral sign (probably the easiest one), induction etc.
â edmz
Oct 1 at 18:26
add a comment |Â
3
And how do you evaluate the Laplace transform? I don't see how it's easier unless you 'cheat' and look up the result in a table.
â Winther
Oct 1 at 9:52
4
Laplace transform is a tool. We use it's formulas whatever we want!
â Nosrati
Oct 1 at 10:01
@Winther: there's actually a lot of ways to evaluate that. Integration by parts, differentiation under the integral sign (probably the easiest one), induction etc.
â edmz
Oct 1 at 18:26
3
3
And how do you evaluate the Laplace transform? I don't see how it's easier unless you 'cheat' and look up the result in a table.
â Winther
Oct 1 at 9:52
And how do you evaluate the Laplace transform? I don't see how it's easier unless you 'cheat' and look up the result in a table.
â Winther
Oct 1 at 9:52
4
4
Laplace transform is a tool. We use it's formulas whatever we want!
â Nosrati
Oct 1 at 10:01
Laplace transform is a tool. We use it's formulas whatever we want!
â Nosrati
Oct 1 at 10:01
@Winther: there's actually a lot of ways to evaluate that. Integration by parts, differentiation under the integral sign (probably the easiest one), induction etc.
â edmz
Oct 1 at 18:26
@Winther: there's actually a lot of ways to evaluate that. Integration by parts, differentiation under the integral sign (probably the easiest one), induction etc.
â edmz
Oct 1 at 18:26
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
Also note:
$$S=sum_a=2^inftysum_b=1^inftyint_0^inftyfracx^be^axb!dx=sum_a=2^inftysum_b=1^inftyfrac1b!int_0^infty x^be^-axdx$$
now let:
$$u=ax$$
$$dx=fracdua$$
so:
$$S=sum_a=2^inftysum_b=1^inftyfrac1a*b!int_0^infty left(fracuaright)^be^-udu=sum_a=2^inftysum_b=1^inftyfraca^-(b+1)b!int_0^infty u^be^-udu$$
and we know that:
$$(n-1)!=Gamma(n)=int_0^infty e^-tt^n-1dt$$
so our summation now simplifies to:
$$S=sum_a=2^inftysum_b=1^inftyfraca^-(b+1)b!b!=sum_a=2^inftysum_b=1^inftyfrac1a^b+1=sum_a=2^inftysum_c=2^inftyfrac1a^c=sum_a=2^inftyleft(sum_c=1^inftyfrac1a^c-frac1aright)=sum_a=2^inftysum_c=1^inftyfrac1a^c-sum_a=2^inftyfrac1a$$
I know this is correct up to the second summation on the final line but after this I am not sure.
1
You definitely don't want to pull out $sum_2^infty frac1a = infty$; note that the converse of $$sum a_n < infty , sum b_n < infty implies sum (a_n + b_n) < infty$$ does not hold. Luckily you don't need to split the sum in $a$, since $$ sum_c=1^infty frac1a^c = frac1a-1 $$ so you have a telescoping sum, giving the result.
â Calvin Khor
Oct 2 at 20:34
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
Also note:
$$S=sum_a=2^inftysum_b=1^inftyint_0^inftyfracx^be^axb!dx=sum_a=2^inftysum_b=1^inftyfrac1b!int_0^infty x^be^-axdx$$
now let:
$$u=ax$$
$$dx=fracdua$$
so:
$$S=sum_a=2^inftysum_b=1^inftyfrac1a*b!int_0^infty left(fracuaright)^be^-udu=sum_a=2^inftysum_b=1^inftyfraca^-(b+1)b!int_0^infty u^be^-udu$$
and we know that:
$$(n-1)!=Gamma(n)=int_0^infty e^-tt^n-1dt$$
so our summation now simplifies to:
$$S=sum_a=2^inftysum_b=1^inftyfraca^-(b+1)b!b!=sum_a=2^inftysum_b=1^inftyfrac1a^b+1=sum_a=2^inftysum_c=2^inftyfrac1a^c=sum_a=2^inftyleft(sum_c=1^inftyfrac1a^c-frac1aright)=sum_a=2^inftysum_c=1^inftyfrac1a^c-sum_a=2^inftyfrac1a$$
I know this is correct up to the second summation on the final line but after this I am not sure.
1
You definitely don't want to pull out $sum_2^infty frac1a = infty$; note that the converse of $$sum a_n < infty , sum b_n < infty implies sum (a_n + b_n) < infty$$ does not hold. Luckily you don't need to split the sum in $a$, since $$ sum_c=1^infty frac1a^c = frac1a-1 $$ so you have a telescoping sum, giving the result.
â Calvin Khor
Oct 2 at 20:34
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
up vote
3
down vote
Also note:
$$S=sum_a=2^inftysum_b=1^inftyint_0^inftyfracx^be^axb!dx=sum_a=2^inftysum_b=1^inftyfrac1b!int_0^infty x^be^-axdx$$
now let:
$$u=ax$$
$$dx=fracdua$$
so:
$$S=sum_a=2^inftysum_b=1^inftyfrac1a*b!int_0^infty left(fracuaright)^be^-udu=sum_a=2^inftysum_b=1^inftyfraca^-(b+1)b!int_0^infty u^be^-udu$$
and we know that:
$$(n-1)!=Gamma(n)=int_0^infty e^-tt^n-1dt$$
so our summation now simplifies to:
$$S=sum_a=2^inftysum_b=1^inftyfraca^-(b+1)b!b!=sum_a=2^inftysum_b=1^inftyfrac1a^b+1=sum_a=2^inftysum_c=2^inftyfrac1a^c=sum_a=2^inftyleft(sum_c=1^inftyfrac1a^c-frac1aright)=sum_a=2^inftysum_c=1^inftyfrac1a^c-sum_a=2^inftyfrac1a$$
I know this is correct up to the second summation on the final line but after this I am not sure.
Also note:
$$S=sum_a=2^inftysum_b=1^inftyint_0^inftyfracx^be^axb!dx=sum_a=2^inftysum_b=1^inftyfrac1b!int_0^infty x^be^-axdx$$
now let:
$$u=ax$$
$$dx=fracdua$$
so:
$$S=sum_a=2^inftysum_b=1^inftyfrac1a*b!int_0^infty left(fracuaright)^be^-udu=sum_a=2^inftysum_b=1^inftyfraca^-(b+1)b!int_0^infty u^be^-udu$$
and we know that:
$$(n-1)!=Gamma(n)=int_0^infty e^-tt^n-1dt$$
so our summation now simplifies to:
$$S=sum_a=2^inftysum_b=1^inftyfraca^-(b+1)b!b!=sum_a=2^inftysum_b=1^inftyfrac1a^b+1=sum_a=2^inftysum_c=2^inftyfrac1a^c=sum_a=2^inftyleft(sum_c=1^inftyfrac1a^c-frac1aright)=sum_a=2^inftysum_c=1^inftyfrac1a^c-sum_a=2^inftyfrac1a$$
I know this is correct up to the second summation on the final line but after this I am not sure.
answered Oct 1 at 23:55
Henry Lee
1,08815
1,08815
1
You definitely don't want to pull out $sum_2^infty frac1a = infty$; note that the converse of $$sum a_n < infty , sum b_n < infty implies sum (a_n + b_n) < infty$$ does not hold. Luckily you don't need to split the sum in $a$, since $$ sum_c=1^infty frac1a^c = frac1a-1 $$ so you have a telescoping sum, giving the result.
â Calvin Khor
Oct 2 at 20:34
add a comment |Â
1
You definitely don't want to pull out $sum_2^infty frac1a = infty$; note that the converse of $$sum a_n < infty , sum b_n < infty implies sum (a_n + b_n) < infty$$ does not hold. Luckily you don't need to split the sum in $a$, since $$ sum_c=1^infty frac1a^c = frac1a-1 $$ so you have a telescoping sum, giving the result.
â Calvin Khor
Oct 2 at 20:34
1
1
You definitely don't want to pull out $sum_2^infty frac1a = infty$; note that the converse of $$sum a_n < infty , sum b_n < infty implies sum (a_n + b_n) < infty$$ does not hold. Luckily you don't need to split the sum in $a$, since $$ sum_c=1^infty frac1a^c = frac1a-1 $$ so you have a telescoping sum, giving the result.
â Calvin Khor
Oct 2 at 20:34
You definitely don't want to pull out $sum_2^infty frac1a = infty$; note that the converse of $$sum a_n < infty , sum b_n < infty implies sum (a_n + b_n) < infty$$ does not hold. Luckily you don't need to split the sum in $a$, since $$ sum_c=1^infty frac1a^c = frac1a-1 $$ so you have a telescoping sum, giving the result.
â Calvin Khor
Oct 2 at 20:34
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2937751%2fdouble-summation-with-improper-integral%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
1
I think this is the simplest way have you done!
â Nosrati
Oct 1 at 9:39
6
One approach: interchange summations and integration (allowed by Tonelli's theorem) and perform the sum's ($e^x$ and geometrical series) to end up with a simple integral.
â Winther
Oct 1 at 9:58