nofiles parameter in limits.conf is not reflecting in the process running under the user

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












nofiles parameter in limits.conf is not reflecting in the process running under the user



Following is the ulimit output



ulimit -a



core file size (blocks, -c) 0



data seg size (kbytes, -d) unlimited



scheduling priority (-e) 0



file size (blocks, -f) unlimited



pending signals (-i) 128308



max locked memory (kbytes, -l) 64



max memory size (kbytes, -m) unlimited
open files (-n) 65536



pipe size (512 bytes, -p) 8



POSIX message queues (bytes, -q) 819200



Following is the output of a process running under same user



cat /proc/53879/limits



Limit Soft Limit Hard Limit Units



Max processes 128308 128308 processes



Max open files 4096 4096 files



Max locked memory 65536 65536 bytes



so actually max open files is set to 65536 but process took 4096, what am I missing why is this process not coming with 65536






linux bash rhel kernel






share

























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    nofiles parameter in limits.conf is not reflecting in the process running under the user



    Following is the ulimit output



    ulimit -a



    core file size (blocks, -c) 0



    data seg size (kbytes, -d) unlimited



    scheduling priority (-e) 0



    file size (blocks, -f) unlimited



    pending signals (-i) 128308



    max locked memory (kbytes, -l) 64



    max memory size (kbytes, -m) unlimited
    open files (-n) 65536



    pipe size (512 bytes, -p) 8



    POSIX message queues (bytes, -q) 819200



    Following is the output of a process running under same user



    cat /proc/53879/limits



    Limit Soft Limit Hard Limit Units



    Max processes 128308 128308 processes



    Max open files 4096 4096 files



    Max locked memory 65536 65536 bytes



    so actually max open files is set to 65536 but process took 4096, what am I missing why is this process not coming with 65536






    linux bash rhel kernel






    share























      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      nofiles parameter in limits.conf is not reflecting in the process running under the user



      Following is the ulimit output



      ulimit -a



      core file size (blocks, -c) 0



      data seg size (kbytes, -d) unlimited



      scheduling priority (-e) 0



      file size (blocks, -f) unlimited



      pending signals (-i) 128308



      max locked memory (kbytes, -l) 64



      max memory size (kbytes, -m) unlimited
      open files (-n) 65536



      pipe size (512 bytes, -p) 8



      POSIX message queues (bytes, -q) 819200



      Following is the output of a process running under same user



      cat /proc/53879/limits



      Limit Soft Limit Hard Limit Units



      Max processes 128308 128308 processes



      Max open files 4096 4096 files



      Max locked memory 65536 65536 bytes



      so actually max open files is set to 65536 but process took 4096, what am I missing why is this process not coming with 65536






      linux bash rhel kernel






      share













      nofiles parameter in limits.conf is not reflecting in the process running under the user



      Following is the ulimit output



      ulimit -a



      core file size (blocks, -c) 0



      data seg size (kbytes, -d) unlimited



      scheduling priority (-e) 0



      file size (blocks, -f) unlimited



      pending signals (-i) 128308



      max locked memory (kbytes, -l) 64



      max memory size (kbytes, -m) unlimited
      open files (-n) 65536



      pipe size (512 bytes, -p) 8



      POSIX message queues (bytes, -q) 819200



      Following is the output of a process running under same user



      cat /proc/53879/limits



      Limit Soft Limit Hard Limit Units



      Max processes 128308 128308 processes



      Max open files 4096 4096 files



      Max locked memory 65536 65536 bytes



      so actually max open files is set to 65536 but process took 4096, what am I missing why is this process not coming with 65536






      linux bash rhel kernel




      linux bash rhel kernel





      share












      share










      share



      share










      asked 4 mins ago









      chaitanya gudur

      275




      275

























          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "106"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: false,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "",
          contentPolicyHtml: "",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f478764%2fnofiles-parameter-in-limits-conf-is-not-reflecting-in-the-process-running-under%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest






















          active

          oldest

          votes













          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes















           

          draft saved


          draft discarded















































           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f478764%2fnofiles-parameter-in-limits-conf-is-not-reflecting-in-the-process-running-under%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest
































































          -

          Popular posts from this blog

          How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

          Image
          Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 1 down vote favorite I'm using WordPress 4.9.8, CiviCRM to 5.5.1, I usually send email to contact by Search> Find contacts View contact details Action> Send email Send email ok, Contact received mail ok like picture But status only Email sent though contact read email or not. So, can CiviCRM can change status to Email read when contact read email? wordpress email share | improve this question asked Sep 26 at 0:12 ToanLuong 49 9 add a comment  |  up vote 1 down vote favorite I'm using WordPress 4.9.8, CiviCRM to 5.5.1, I usually send email to contact by Search> Find contacts View contact details Action> Send email Send email ok, Contact received mail ok like picture But status only Email sent though contact read email or not. So, can CiviCRM can change status to Email read when contact read email? wordpress email share | improve this questi...
          Read more

          Displaying single band from multi-band raster using QGIS

          Image
          Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP 1 How can I extract a single band from multi-band raster in QGIS? I have an remote sensed image which has 6 bands (including NDVI band), I want to display each band separately, but have no idea how to do. I have seen some questions similar here but none worked for me. The original image (has 6 bands) is: I want to display the band 6 which should be like this: But I tried gdal_translate, and couldn't get the correct result. What I have got is: qgis raster multi-band share | improve this question edited Mar 5 at 0:53 Summer asked Mar 4 at 6:42 Summer Summer 23 6 Is this any help gis.stackexchange.com/questions/220658/… ? if not gis.stackexchange.com/questions/62133/… might help. – Michael Stimson Mar 4 at 6:46 Thanks for answering but when I used gdal_translate, qgis showed that 'Error 4: Kayena.tif: No such file or directory". Would you know how to fi...
          Read more

          How many registers does an x86_64 CPU actually have?

          Image
          Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 2 down vote favorite I am currently learning reverse engineering and am studying the flags register. I had in my mind that rflags was just another name for one of the 16 general purpose registers, for example rax or rbx . But it looks like rflags is actually an additional register. So that makes 17 registers in total... how many more could there be? I have spent at least an hour on this and found numerous different answers. The best answer so far is this, which says that there are 40 registers in total. 16 General Purpose Registers 2 Status Registers 6 Code Segment Registers 16 SSE Registers 8 FPU/MMX Registers But if I add that up, I get 48. Could anybody provide an official answer on how many registers an x86_64 CPU has (e.g. an Intel i7). Additionally, I have seen references to 'hardware' and 'architectural' registers. What are those registers and how many are there? register x86-64 share | improve this...
          Read more