Is the Republican party obligated to renominate Trump for Presidency in 2020?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
Presuming Donald Trump wants to become nominated for a second time, is the Republican party obligated to let him do so? Or can they out forward alternative candidates that would potentially defeat Trump in the primaries? Is there historical precedent for a party abandoning their previously elected President at the next election?
united-states republican-party
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
Presuming Donald Trump wants to become nominated for a second time, is the Republican party obligated to let him do so? Or can they out forward alternative candidates that would potentially defeat Trump in the primaries? Is there historical precedent for a party abandoning their previously elected President at the next election?
united-states republican-party
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
Presuming Donald Trump wants to become nominated for a second time, is the Republican party obligated to let him do so? Or can they out forward alternative candidates that would potentially defeat Trump in the primaries? Is there historical precedent for a party abandoning their previously elected President at the next election?
united-states republican-party
Presuming Donald Trump wants to become nominated for a second time, is the Republican party obligated to let him do so? Or can they out forward alternative candidates that would potentially defeat Trump in the primaries? Is there historical precedent for a party abandoning their previously elected President at the next election?
united-states republican-party
united-states republican-party
asked 1 hour ago
JonathanReez
11.5k1065137
11.5k1065137
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
5
down vote
Gerald Ford came close to losing to Ronald Reagan in the Republican Party presidential primaries of 1976. For a variety of reasons it could be argued that's not precedent, but it certainly shows a challenger can put up a fight.
So I'd conclude there is no obligation to renominate, or prohibition of alternate candidates.
The convention tally reported on Wikipedia was: Gerald Ford 1187, Ronald Reagan 1070, Elliot L. Richardson 1. In the general election, Jimmy Carter defeated Ford.
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
5
down vote
Gerald Ford came close to losing to Ronald Reagan in the Republican Party presidential primaries of 1976. For a variety of reasons it could be argued that's not precedent, but it certainly shows a challenger can put up a fight.
So I'd conclude there is no obligation to renominate, or prohibition of alternate candidates.
The convention tally reported on Wikipedia was: Gerald Ford 1187, Ronald Reagan 1070, Elliot L. Richardson 1. In the general election, Jimmy Carter defeated Ford.
add a comment |Â
up vote
5
down vote
Gerald Ford came close to losing to Ronald Reagan in the Republican Party presidential primaries of 1976. For a variety of reasons it could be argued that's not precedent, but it certainly shows a challenger can put up a fight.
So I'd conclude there is no obligation to renominate, or prohibition of alternate candidates.
The convention tally reported on Wikipedia was: Gerald Ford 1187, Ronald Reagan 1070, Elliot L. Richardson 1. In the general election, Jimmy Carter defeated Ford.
add a comment |Â
up vote
5
down vote
up vote
5
down vote
Gerald Ford came close to losing to Ronald Reagan in the Republican Party presidential primaries of 1976. For a variety of reasons it could be argued that's not precedent, but it certainly shows a challenger can put up a fight.
So I'd conclude there is no obligation to renominate, or prohibition of alternate candidates.
The convention tally reported on Wikipedia was: Gerald Ford 1187, Ronald Reagan 1070, Elliot L. Richardson 1. In the general election, Jimmy Carter defeated Ford.
Gerald Ford came close to losing to Ronald Reagan in the Republican Party presidential primaries of 1976. For a variety of reasons it could be argued that's not precedent, but it certainly shows a challenger can put up a fight.
So I'd conclude there is no obligation to renominate, or prohibition of alternate candidates.
The convention tally reported on Wikipedia was: Gerald Ford 1187, Ronald Reagan 1070, Elliot L. Richardson 1. In the general election, Jimmy Carter defeated Ford.
edited 58 mins ago
answered 1 hour ago
Burt_Harris
70115
70115
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpolitics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f34928%2fis-the-republican-party-obligated-to-renominate-trump-for-presidency-in-2020%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password